Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Should we release 2.0.10?
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:15:47 +0900, Jason Dorje Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Markstedt wrote: On 6/19/08, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Many distributions are still not released version (of the distribution) which uses Freeciv 2.1 (Ubuntu Dapper Gutsy are both supported to 2009 and use Freeciv 2.0) My public 2.0 server seems to be sometimes more used than 2.1 ones. It's over year since 2.0.9 was released and many crasher bugs and security fixes has been since made to S2_0 branch. - ML I support this. Jason, are there any particular differences in creating a 2.0 release as opposed to a 2.1 one? 2.0 should be just the same release system as 2.1. Making a new 2.0.x should be rather easy. Might be a good idea to give translators the opportunity to backport any new translations though (there shouldn't really be new strings in 2.0 but trunk or 2.1 may contain expanded translations). Honestly I'd even consider a new 1.14 release. Some people really liked the 1.14 gameplay and the branch does contain some bugfixes. -jason I'm preparing changelog and news for 2.0.10. Can I tag the release at any time? ~Daniel -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Should we release 2.0.10?
Is somebody able to fix the 2.0.9 crashes reported in #39472 and #39582? I can still reproduce the crashes with current S2_0. Another reported 2.0 problem is #39757, which has a patch that hasn't been committed yet. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Should we release 2.0.10?
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:05:19 +0900, Christian Prochaska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is somebody able to fix the 2.0.9 crashes reported in #39472 and #39582? I can still reproduce the crashes with current S2_0. Another reported 2.0 problem is #39757, which has a patch that hasn't been committed yet. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev Please let me know when these issues are resolved, and I'll resume the release process. Preliminary NEWS at http://freeciv.wikia.com/wiki/NEWS-2.0.10 -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Should we release 2.0.10?
Daniel Markstedt wrote: On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:05:19 +0900, Christian Prochaska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is somebody able to fix the 2.0.9 crashes reported in #39472 and #39582? I can still reproduce the crashes with current S2_0. Another reported 2.0 problem is #39757, which has a patch that hasn't been committed yet. Please let me know when these issues are resolved, and I'll resume the release process. Preliminary NEWS at http://freeciv.wikia.com/wiki/NEWS-2.0.10 39582 and 39757 are done. 39582 I can't reproduce without more instructions. -jason ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Should we release 2.0.10?
Daniel Markstedt wrote: On 6/19/08, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Many distributions are still not released version (of the distribution) which uses Freeciv 2.1 (Ubuntu Dapper Gutsy are both supported to 2009 and use Freeciv 2.0) My public 2.0 server seems to be sometimes more used than 2.1 ones. It's over year since 2.0.9 was released and many crasher bugs and security fixes has been since made to S2_0 branch. - ML I support this. Jason, are there any particular differences in creating a 2.0 release as opposed to a 2.1 one? 2.0 should be just the same release system as 2.1. Making a new 2.0.x should be rather easy. Might be a good idea to give translators the opportunity to backport any new translations though (there shouldn't really be new strings in 2.0 but trunk or 2.1 may contain expanded translations). Honestly I'd even consider a new 1.14 release. Some people really liked the 1.14 gameplay and the branch does contain some bugfixes. -jason ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Should we release 2.0.10?
On 6/19/08, Marko Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Many distributions are still not released version (of the distribution) which uses Freeciv 2.1 (Ubuntu Dapper Gutsy are both supported to 2009 and use Freeciv 2.0) My public 2.0 server seems to be sometimes more used than 2.1 ones. It's over year since 2.0.9 was released and many crasher bugs and security fixes has been since made to S2_0 branch. - ML I support this. Jason, are there any particular differences in creating a 2.0 release as opposed to a 2.1 one? ~Daniel ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] Should we release 2.0.10?
Many distributions are still not released version (of the distribution) which uses Freeciv 2.1 (Ubuntu Dapper Gutsy are both supported to 2009 and use Freeciv 2.0) My public 2.0 server seems to be sometimes more used than 2.1 ones. It's over year since 2.0.9 was released and many crasher bugs and security fixes has been since made to S2_0 branch. - ML ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
