Re: [Freesurfer] FW: Permutation output

2015-08-18 Thread pablo najt
Hi Doug,
I am attaching the permutation log file. 
Thanks!
Pablo

Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:15:14 -0400
From: gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FW:  Permutation output


  

  
  
Can you send me the log file from the glmdir folder? The log file
that has perm in the name?



On 8/12/15 11:33 AM, pablo najt wrote:



  
  Will do that from now on. the output is as follow:
This is the output I am getting which I believe is not what
  I need for check the permutation output

  C.dat F.mgh cnr.mgh gamma.mgh gammavar.mgh maxvox.dat sig.mgh
  

   Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:17:38 -0400

 From: gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

 To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

 Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FW: Permutation output

 

 look in the folder of one of the contrasts (eg, 

 rh-Diff-BD-HC-Intercept-sulc). Also, if you can paste
such text into the 

 email it is much more convenient for us than to sent us
a tiff

 

 On 08/12/2015 11:12 AM, pablo najt wrote:

  Dear FS exp,

  In case my message got swamped, I am reposting my
question.

  Many thanks!

  Pablo

 

 



  From: pablon...@hotmail.com

  To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

  Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:02:54 +

  Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Permutation output

 

  Thanks. Sorry but I am not being able to figure it
out yet. Basically 

  I am not getting the expected outcome.

  So I thought to give you an idea of how I am
running permutations.

 

  mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir rh_sulc_fwhm25 --sim perm
5000 1.3 perm.neg.13 

  --sim-sign neg

 

  And I am attaching a snapshot of the output files
and the log of 

  mdi_glmfit-sim.

  At this stage I am wondering whether in order to
run permutation it is 

  required use as input the output from fsgd rather
than qdec, because 

  my input is from qdec. Would this make any
difference?

  Thanks.

  Pablo

 

   Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:13:13 -0400

   From: gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

   To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

   Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Permutation output

  

   It is the same thing, but the permutation
output will have the name you

   gave the csdbase when you ran the simulation
(ie, the 4th arg to --sim)

  

   On 08/10/2015 05:54 AM, pablo najt wrote:

Thank you Doug.

I run permutations with mdi_glmfit-sim
--sim perm. Would you be able

to advice on the output and how to open
the permutation outputs? The

tutorial instructs on how to open the
*.summary file for the summary

of clusters and *.sig.cluster.mgh the
cluster corrected map, but not

the permutation output.

Thank you,

Pablo

   



 



Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:53:55 -0400

From: gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Correction for
multiple comparisons - qdec

   

You can try permutation, though it is
often more constraining than

those other two options. To do this,
you'll need to run 

  mri_glmfit-sim

from the command line using the --sim
perm option. Run it with --help

to get examples

   

On 8/7/15 6:59 AM, pablo najt wrote:

   

Dear FS experts,

I have a question about running
corrections for multiple

comparisons. I am finding a fairly large
cluster analyzing 2

groups on sulcal depth. However when I
tried FDR or cluster wise

correction the results do not seem to
survive. As the result is on

the region I was predicting I want to
make sure there are no other

options for correcting for multiple
 

Re: [Freesurfer] Trakula

2015-08-18 Thread B M
Hi Anastasia,
Please find attached the trac-all.log file. Thank you very much for your
help.
Bahram

2015-08-17 19:31 GMT+02:00 Anastasia Yendiki ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:


 Hi Bahram - Can you please send us your entire trac-all.log file? Thanks!

 a.y


 On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, B M wrote:

 Dear experts,
 I have the last version of tTrakula. i did the first step with
   trac-all -prep -c bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula/dmrirc
 This worked properly to the end as shown below:
 trac-preproc finished without error at Fri Aug 14 17:31:29 CEST 2015

 However looking at logfile i found following errors:
 flirt -in
 bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula//P01-a/dlabel/anat/aparc+aseg_mask.nii.gz
 -ref
 bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula//P01-a/dmri/lowb.nii.gz -out
 bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula//P01-a/dlabel/diff/aparc+aseg_mask.bbr.nii.gz
 -applyxfm -init
 bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula//P01-a/dmri/xfms/anat2diff.bbr.mat
 -interp nearestneighbour
 terminate called after throwing an instance of 'NEWMAT::SingularException'
 Abort (core dumped)

 OR

 Loading brain mask of output subject from

 /home/bm/bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula/P01-a/dlabel/mni/lowb_brain_mask.bbr.nii.gz
 niiRead(): error opening file
 /home/bm/bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula/P01-a/dlabel/mni/lowb_brain_mask.bbr.nii.gz
 ERROR: Could not read
 /home/bm/bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula/P01-a/dlabel/mni/lowb_brain_mask.bbr.nii.gz


 AND as i tried the next step i got the following error:

 bm@bm-linux:~$ trac-all -bedp -c
 bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula/dmrirc
 INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula/
 INFO: Diffusion root is bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula/
 Actual FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer
 WARN: Running FSL's bedbost locally - this might take a while
 WARN: It is recommended to run this step on a cluster
 bedpostx_mgh -n 2 bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula//P01-a/dmri
 /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/bedpostx_mgh: 131:
 /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/bedpostx_mgh: Syntax error: ( unexpected

 Could you please advise me what to do?
 Best

 Bahram


 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
 is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.


Fri Aug 14 17:22:48 CEST 2015
/home/bm
/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/trac-all
-prep -c bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula/dmrirc
Subject P01-a
SUBJECTS_DIR bmdaten/Auswertung/ALS-Review/Trakula/
FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer
build-stamp.txt: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0
bm
bm-linux
Linux bm-linux 3.11.0-26-generic #45~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 15 04:02:35 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
cputime  unlimited
filesize unlimited
datasize unlimited
stacksize8192 kbytes
coredumpsize 0 kbytes
memoryuseunlimited
vmemoryuse   unlimited
descriptors  1024 
memorylocked 64 kbytes
maxproc  256954 
maxlocks unlimited
maxsignal256954 
maxmessage   819200 
maxnice  0 
maxrtprio0 
maxrttimeunlimited

 total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:  32909372   309815561927816  0 776952   25756624
-/+ buffers/cache:4447980   28461392
Swap:124999676   9000  124990676


Program versions:
$Id: trac-all,v 1.56 2014/05/26 08:28:32 ayendiki Exp $
mri_convert --all-info 
ProgramName: mri_convert  ProgramArguments: --all-info  ProgramVersion: $Name:  $  TimeStamp: 2015/08/14-15:22:48-GMT  BuildTimeStamp: Aug 16 2014 05:13:24  CVS: $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.213 2014/07/29 19:22:31 fischl Exp $  User: bm  Machine: bm-linux  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 3.11.0-26-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 30400 
FLIRT version 6.0
$Id: bbregister,v 1.49.2.3 2013/03/25 18:04:53 greve Exp $
$Id: mri_cvs_register,v 1.15.2.12 2013/02/09 00:37:37 nicks Exp $
ProgramName: dmri_motion  ProgramArguments: --all-info  ProgramVersion: $Name:  $  TimeStamp: 2015/08/14-15:22:48-GMT  BuildTimeStamp: Feb  2 2013 22:46:06  CVS:   User: bm  Machine: bm-linux  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 3.11.0-26-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 30400 
ProgramName: dmri_train  ProgramArguments: --all-info  ProgramVersion: $Name:  $  TimeStamp: 2015/08/14-15:22:48-GMT  BuildTimeStamp: May 23 2014 05:15:35  CVS:   User: bm  Machine: bm-linux  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 3.11.0-26-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 30400 

[Freesurfer] control points from cross transferred to long

2015-08-18 Thread prasser

Hi,

On this page https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalEdits it 
mentions it is recommended to check if all CPs are accurately placed in the 
long.


I was wondering what is the best way to do this? 


I know I can type in the RAS coordinates from the control.dat file and check 
each one this way, but this seems a little tedious and prone to errors 
especially as I can't paste into tkmedit.


Also, is there a command that can get the intensity from brainmask.mgz from a 
given RAS coordinate? 




Thanks
 
P



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] license error

2015-08-18 Thread Z K
Hello,

You say the .license file is in your applications folder but it's 
supposed to be located in your /Applications/freesurfer folder.

If /Applications/freesurfer/.license does exist on your machine, than 
please make absolutely sure it exactly matches the email sent to you 
after you registered.

Lastly, if neither of the above cases solves the problem, please send me 
your .license file *TO MY DIRECT EMAIL ADDRESS* (not the freesurfer 
list!) so I may examine it. Thanks.

-Zeke



On 08/18/2015 02:51 PM, Frank Kanayet wrote:
 Hi, I just installed freesurfer on my computer and included the
 license.txt film in the applications folder but when I tried to use the
 tkmedit bert orig.mgz to test the installation I received a message
 saying that ERROR: FreeSurfer license file
 /Applications/freesurfer/license not found.

If you are outside the NMR-Martinos Center,

go to http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ to

get a valid license file (it's free).

If you are inside the NMR-Martinos Center,

make sure to source the standard environment.


 Can you help me figure out what is the mistake?


 Thanks,


 --
 **
 Frank J. Kanayet, Ph.D.
 Stanford University
 420 Jordan Hall, Room 342

 **


 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



[Freesurfer] license error

2015-08-18 Thread Frank Kanayet
Hi, I just installed freesurfer on my computer and included the license.txt
film in the applications folder but when I tried to use the tkmedit bert
orig.mgz to test the installation I received a message saying that ERROR:
FreeSurfer license file /Applications/freesurfer/.license not found.

  If you are outside the NMR-Martinos Center,

  go to http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu to

  get a valid license file (it's free).

  If you are inside the NMR-Martinos Center,

  make sure to source the standard environment.


Can you help me figure out what is the mistake?


Thanks,

-- 
**
Frank J. Kanayet, Ph.D.
Stanford University
420 Jordan Hall, Room 342

**
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] control points from cross transferred to long

2015-08-18 Thread Lee Tirrell
In the dev version of freeview, you can go to File -Load Point set, and choose 
the control point file (shoulb be subject/tmp/control.dat)


This allows you to flip through the  points by entering the control point 
number or using an arrow to go to the next/previous control point in the file. 
This moves the cursor to the control point (which shows up as a green dot by 
default).


You can also do the same thing to load them in the stable version of freeview, 
but there is no box to enter a control point number. If you move through the 
brain, you will see the control points as dots.


Best,
Lee

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, prasser wrote:



Hi,
On this page https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalEdits it mentions 
it is recommended to
check if all CPs are accurately placed in the long.

I was wondering what is the best way to do this? 

I know I can type in the RAS coordinates from the control.dat file and check 
each one this way, but this seems
a little tedious and prone to errors especially as I can't paste into tkmedit.

Also, is there a command that can get the intensity from brainmask.mgz from a 
given RAS coordinate? 


Thanks
 
P


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] Using FreeSurfer Suggested Morphometry Sequences

2015-08-18 Thread John Pyles
Hi all,

We have recently installed the FreeSurfer suggested morphometry sequences on 
our Siemens Verio 3T. Specifically, the multiecho MPRAGE (MEMPRAGE), and 
multiecho FLASH (MEFLASH). Our goal is to get the best FreeSurfer 
reconstruction results possible for use with fMRI surface analyses, diffusion 
imaging, and other purposes. For the current project, scan time is not at a 
premium since we have 60-90min budgeted for anatomical and diffusion weighted 
scans. We’re just looking for the best results.  

However, after looking through the wiki and email archives, I’m having a hard 
time figuring out what the most up to date recommendations are for what 
sequences to use and how to use them with recon-all. 

Some specific questions:

1) The original 2009 Suggested Morphometry Protocols” document, the MEFLASH 
seems to be recommended as the best sequence to use for whole-brain 
segmentation. But other more recent posts to the email list suggest using 
MEMPRAGE as the default protocol. We also have a very nice T2-SPACE protocol 
we’ve been running. What is the current recommendation?

2) Is the procedure for using MEMPRAGE with recon-all to just input the RMS 
scan and not the 4 different echos? 

3) Is it possible to use the MEFLASH scans with recon-all? If so, how are they 
input and is processing of the two different echo time scans required before 
running recon-all? The wiki entry on MEF is from 2008, so I’m not sure what’s 
happened since then.

4) What is the current recommendation on using the -3T and -mprage flags with 
recon-all?

5) Since we are scanning on a Siemens Verio instead of the TIM Trio scanners I 
believe the sequences were developed on, we have had to modify some protocol 
parameters. If anyone has been successfully scanning MEFLASH and/or MEMPRAGE on 
a Verio or possibly Skyra and has good parameters to use that would be great. 
Our test scans look good, but there is always room for improvement.

6) Finally, is 1mm isovoxel still recommended? Or should we try to push the 
resolution below 1mm? 

Thanks so much in advance for any advice!

best regards,
John

__

John Pyles, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition
Department of Psychology
Carnegie Mellon University
email: jpy...@cmu.edu
phone: 206.552.0107
__



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] fast_selxavg3 ( ) failed\n

2015-08-18 Thread Gay,Charles Wysaw
Hi -
I've encountered an error in step 8 of the functional connectivity 
analysis.

here is some of the information requested with errors:
FREESURFER_HOME: 
/Volumes/projects/painimaging/Bishop/FreeSurfer_R01/freesurfer

Build stamp: freesurfer-Darwin-lion-stable-pub-v5.3.0

Kernel info: Darwin 14.0.0 x86_64

-
Please include the following additional information in your report:

   1) subject name: B113v1
   2) the entire command-line executed: selxavg3-sess -s B113v1 -a 
fc.linsulaseed.surf.lh   %step 7 code was: mkanalysis-sess -analysis 
fc.linsulaseed.surf.lh -surface fsaverage lh -fwhm 5 -notask -taskreg 
L_Insula.dat 1 -nuisreg vcsf.dat 5 -nuisreg wm.dat 5 -mcextreg -polyfit 
5 -nskip 4 -fsd rest -TR 2 -per-session  %which completed successfully
   3) the error message generated :Started at Wed Aug 12 12:56:41 EDT 
2015
Ended   at Wed Aug 12 13:11:49 EDT 2015
preproc-sess done
---
/Volumes/projects/painimaging/Bishop/FreeSurfer_R01/Project/B113v1
Wed Aug 12 13:11:50 EDT 2015
anadir = 
/Volumes/projects/painimaging/Bishop/FreeSurfer_R01/Project/B113v1/rest/fc.linsulaseed.surf.lh
DoGLMFit = 1
DoContrasts = 1
UpdateNeeded = 1
--
--- matlab output 
matlab: Command not found.
--
ERROR: fast_selxavg3() failed\n
   4) optionally include the subject's /script/recon-all.log: I included 
the recon-all.log and selxavg3-sees-rest-fc...log

On A previous post I saw the command which matlab was asked: below is 
the result when I entered it:which matlab
matlab: Command not found.
Thanks for assistance,
chaz


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] control points from cross transferred to long

2015-08-18 Thread Martin Reuter
Hi P,


if you want to investigate the control.dat file you can do so with freeview 
(File- Load Point Set and choose the control.dat file). In the dev version of 
Freeview there is an option to select a cp number or move through the list with 
arrows. In the stable version, there is no box, but you would still see the CP 
as white dots when scrolling through the brain. 

If you transfer the CP from cross, usually they should be accurately placed in 
the long, so a quick check is usually fine.

Best, Martin

 On Aug 18, 2015, at 8:23 AM, prasser pras...@zoho.com wrote:
 
 
 Hi,
 
 On this page https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalEdits it 
 mentions it is recommended to check if all CPs are accurately placed in the 
 long.
 
 I was wondering what is the best way to do this? 
 
 I know I can type in the RAS coordinates from the control.dat file and check 
 each one this way, but this seems a little tedious and prone to errors 
 especially as I can't paste into tkmedit.
 
 Also, is there a command that can get the intensity from brainmask.mgz from a 
 given RAS coordinate? 
 
 
 Thanks
  
 P
 
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Using FreeSurfer Suggested Morphometry Sequences

2015-08-18 Thread Bruce Fischl
no, there is a post-hoc recon-all target you can use. -T2 or -T2pial or 
something. Sorry, I don't remember, maybe someone else can fill in the 
details


Bruce

On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, John Pyles wrote:


Hi Bruce,

Thanks so much! We do have a bandwidth matched T2-space. So should that be fed 
into recon-all at the same time as the MEMPRAGE as a second series?

best,
John





On 8/18/15, at Tue,Aug 18 - 8:32:00 PM, Bruce Fischl 
fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

Hi John

the MEFLASH never achieved as good cortical contrast as the memprage, so for 
cotical stuff we still recomment memprage. And yes, feeding the RMS to 
recon-all will be fine. If you can get a readout/bandwidth matched T2-space or 
FLAIR that can be a pretty big help as well for avoiding dura

cheers
Bruce

On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, John Pyles wrote:


Hi all,

We have recently installed the FreeSurfer suggested morphometry sequences on 
our Siemens Verio 3T. Specifically, the multiecho MPRAGE (MEMPRAGE), and 
multiecho FLASH (MEFLASH). Our goal is to get the best FreeSurfer 
reconstruction results possible for use with fMRI surface analyses, diffusion 
imaging, and other purposes. For the current project, scan time is not at a 
premium since we have 60-90min budgeted for anatomical and diffusion weighted 
scans. We’re just looking for the best results.

However, after looking through the wiki and email archives, I’m having a hard 
time figuring out what the most up to date recommendations are for what 
sequences to use and how to use them with recon-all.

Some specific questions:

1) The original 2009 Suggested Morphometry Protocols” document, the MEFLASH 
seems to be recommended as the best sequence to use for whole-brain segmentation. 
But other more recent posts to the email list suggest using MEMPRAGE as the default 
protocol. We also have a very nice T2-SPACE protocol we’ve been running. What is the 
current recommendation?

2) Is the procedure for using MEMPRAGE with recon-all to just input the RMS 
scan and not the 4 different echos?

3) Is it possible to use the MEFLASH scans with recon-all? If so, how are they 
input and is processing of the two different echo time scans required before 
running recon-all? The wiki entry on MEF is from 2008, so I’m not sure what’s 
happened since then.

4) What is the current recommendation on using the -3T and -mprage flags with 
recon-all?

5) Since we are scanning on a Siemens Verio instead of the TIM Trio scanners I 
believe the sequences were developed on, we have had to modify some protocol 
parameters. If anyone has been successfully scanning MEFLASH and/or MEMPRAGE on 
a Verio or possibly Skyra and has good parameters to use that would be great. 
Our test scans look good, but there is always room for improvement.

6) Finally, is 1mm isovoxel still recommended? Or should we try to push the 
resolution below 1mm?

Thanks so much in advance for any advice!

best regards,
John

__

John Pyles, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition
Department of Psychology
Carnegie Mellon University
email: jpy...@cmu.edu
phone: 206.552.0107
__



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Using FreeSurfer Suggested Morphometry Sequences

2015-08-18 Thread John Pyles
Hi Bruce,

Thanks so much! We do have a bandwidth matched T2-space. So should that be fed 
into recon-all at the same time as the MEMPRAGE as a second series? 

best,
John




 On 8/18/15, at Tue,Aug 18 - 8:32:00 PM, Bruce Fischl 
 fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
 
 Hi John
 
 the MEFLASH never achieved as good cortical contrast as the memprage, so for 
 cotical stuff we still recomment memprage. And yes, feeding the RMS to 
 recon-all will be fine. If you can get a readout/bandwidth matched T2-space 
 or FLAIR that can be a pretty big help as well for avoiding dura
 
 cheers
 Bruce
 
 On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, John Pyles wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 We have recently installed the FreeSurfer suggested morphometry sequences on 
 our Siemens Verio 3T. Specifically, the multiecho MPRAGE (MEMPRAGE), and 
 multiecho FLASH (MEFLASH). Our goal is to get the best FreeSurfer 
 reconstruction results possible for use with fMRI surface analyses, 
 diffusion imaging, and other purposes. For the current project, scan time is 
 not at a premium since we have 60-90min budgeted for anatomical and 
 diffusion weighted scans. We’re just looking for the best results.
 
 However, after looking through the wiki and email archives, I’m having a 
 hard time figuring out what the most up to date recommendations are for what 
 sequences to use and how to use them with recon-all.
 
 Some specific questions:
 
 1) The original 2009 Suggested Morphometry Protocols” document, the MEFLASH 
 seems to be recommended as the best sequence to use for whole-brain 
 segmentation. But other more recent posts to the email list suggest using 
 MEMPRAGE as the default protocol. We also have a very nice T2-SPACE protocol 
 we’ve been running. What is the current recommendation?
 
 2) Is the procedure for using MEMPRAGE with recon-all to just input the RMS 
 scan and not the 4 different echos?
 
 3) Is it possible to use the MEFLASH scans with recon-all? If so, how are 
 they input and is processing of the two different echo time scans required 
 before running recon-all? The wiki entry on MEF is from 2008, so I’m not 
 sure what’s happened since then.
 
 4) What is the current recommendation on using the -3T and -mprage flags 
 with recon-all?
 
 5) Since we are scanning on a Siemens Verio instead of the TIM Trio scanners 
 I believe the sequences were developed on, we have had to modify some 
 protocol parameters. If anyone has been successfully scanning MEFLASH and/or 
 MEMPRAGE on a Verio or possibly Skyra and has good parameters to use that 
 would be great. Our test scans look good, but there is always room for 
 improvement.
 
 6) Finally, is 1mm isovoxel still recommended? Or should we try to push the 
 resolution below 1mm?
 
 Thanks so much in advance for any advice!
 
 best regards,
 John
 
 __
 
 John Pyles, Ph.D.
 Research Scientist
 Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition
 Department of Psychology
 Carnegie Mellon University
 email: jpy...@cmu.edu
 phone: 206.552.0107
 __
 
 
 
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
 at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Using FreeSurfer Suggested Morphometry Sequences

2015-08-18 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi John

the MEFLASH never achieved as good cortical contrast as the memprage, so 
for cotical stuff we still recomment memprage. And yes, feeding the RMS to 
recon-all will be fine. If you can get a readout/bandwidth matched T2-space 
or FLAIR that can be a pretty big help as well for avoiding dura


cheers
Bruce

On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, John Pyles wrote:


Hi all,

We have recently installed the FreeSurfer suggested morphometry sequences on 
our Siemens Verio 3T. Specifically, the multiecho MPRAGE (MEMPRAGE), and 
multiecho FLASH (MEFLASH). Our goal is to get the best FreeSurfer 
reconstruction results possible for use with fMRI surface analyses, diffusion 
imaging, and other purposes. For the current project, scan time is not at a 
premium since we have 60-90min budgeted for anatomical and diffusion weighted 
scans. We’re just looking for the best results.

However, after looking through the wiki and email archives, I’m having a hard 
time figuring out what the most up to date recommendations are for what 
sequences to use and how to use them with recon-all.

Some specific questions:

1) The original 2009 Suggested Morphometry Protocols” document, the MEFLASH 
seems to be recommended as the best sequence to use for whole-brain segmentation. 
But other more recent posts to the email list suggest using MEMPRAGE as the default 
protocol. We also have a very nice T2-SPACE protocol we’ve been running. What is the 
current recommendation?

2) Is the procedure for using MEMPRAGE with recon-all to just input the RMS 
scan and not the 4 different echos?

3) Is it possible to use the MEFLASH scans with recon-all? If so, how are they 
input and is processing of the two different echo time scans required before 
running recon-all? The wiki entry on MEF is from 2008, so I’m not sure what’s 
happened since then.

4) What is the current recommendation on using the -3T and -mprage flags with 
recon-all?

5) Since we are scanning on a Siemens Verio instead of the TIM Trio scanners I 
believe the sequences were developed on, we have had to modify some protocol 
parameters. If anyone has been successfully scanning MEFLASH and/or MEMPRAGE on 
a Verio or possibly Skyra and has good parameters to use that would be great. 
Our test scans look good, but there is always room for improvement.

6) Finally, is 1mm isovoxel still recommended? Or should we try to push the 
resolution below 1mm?

Thanks so much in advance for any advice!

best regards,
John

__

John Pyles, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition
Department of Psychology
Carnegie Mellon University
email: jpy...@cmu.edu
phone: 206.552.0107
__



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] Query about transformations in the recon-all

2015-08-18 Thread chenhf_uestc
Dear Freesurfer experts,

I have some questions in the recon-all. After reading online manual and 
discussing with the experts in the maillist, I have known all the recon-all 
procedures performed in the individual native space. However, I very confuse 
that there are many transformations in the recon-all, e.g., 1. talairach 
transformation (This computes the affine transform from the orig volume to the 
MNI305 atlas using the MINC program mritotal (see Collins, et al, 1994) through 
a FreeSurfer script called talairach), why I need transform from native space 
to MNI305; 2. EM (GCA) Registration (Computes transform to align the mri/nu.mgz 
volume to the default GCA atlas found in FREESURFER_HOME/average). What is the 
GCA atlas? what is the usage of this atlas? 3. CA Register (Computes a 
nonlinear transform to align with GCA atlas. Creates the file 
mri/transform/talairach.m3z). Why we should align with GCA atlas? This 
transform is nonlinear, and what is the transform in the EM (GCA) Registration 
(Affine? 12 dof?); 4. EM Registration, with Skull (Computes transform to align 
volume mri/nu_noneck.mgz with GCA volume possessing the skull); 

Is there any detailed documentation in the online manual to introduce these 
transformation? Could anyone give me a website?

Any help would be greatly appreciate.

Best,
Feng___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Query about transformations in the recon-all

2015-08-18 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi Feng

we compute many transforms for many reasons. The em reg is computed once 
in the image with skull to help with skull stripping, then again to the GCA 
atlas to initialize the nonlinear transform for computing the aseg 
segmentation.


cheers
Bruce


On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, chenhf_uestc wrote:


Dear Freesurfer experts,
 
I have some questions in the recon-all. After reading online manual and 
discussing with the experts in
the maillist, I have known all the recon-all procedures performed in the 
individual native space.
However, I very confuse that there are many transformations in the recon-all, 
e.g., 1. talairach
transformation (This computes the affine transform from the orig volume to the 
MNI305 atlas using the
MINC program mritotal (see Collins, et al, 1994) through a FreeSurfer script 
called talairach), why I
need transform from native space to MNI305; 2. EM (GCA) Registration (Computes 
transform to align the
mri/nu.mgz volume to the default GCA atlas found in FREESURFER_HOME/average). 
What is the GCA atlas?
what is the usage of this atlas? 3. CA Register (Computes a nonlinear transform 
to align with GCA
atlas. Creates the file mri/transform/talairach.m3z). Why we should align with 
GCA atlas? This
transform is nonlinear, and what is the transform in the EM (GCA) Registration 
(Affine? 12 dof?); 4.
EM Registration, with Skull (Computes transform to align volume 
mri/nu_noneck.mgz with GCA volume
possessing the skull);
 
Is there any detailed documentation in the online manual to introduce these 
transformation? Could
anyone give me a website?
 
Any help would be greatly appreciate.
 
Best,
Feng
 

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Permutation output

2015-08-18 Thread Douglas N Greve
The log file ends abruptly. Try the following

mri_glmfit-sim --debug --glmdir rh_sulc_fwhm25 --sim perm 5000 1.3 
perm.neg.13 --sim-sign neg | tee doug.log

and send me doug.log

doug



On 08/11/2015 07:02 AM, pablo najt wrote:
 Thanks. Sorry but I am not being able to figure it out yet. Basically 
 I am not getting the expected outcome.
 So I thought to give you an idea of how I am running permutations.

 mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir rh_sulc_fwhm25 --sim perm 5000 1.3 perm.neg.13 
 --sim-sign neg

 And I am attaching a snapshot of the output files and the log of 
 mdi_glmfit-sim.
 At this stage I am wondering whether in order to run permutation it is 
 required use as input the output from fsgd rather than qdec, because 
 my input is from qdec. Would this make any difference?
 Thanks.
 Pablo

  Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:13:13 -0400
  From: gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Permutation output
 
  It is the same thing, but the permutation output will have the name you
  gave the csdbase when you ran the simulation (ie, the 4th arg to --sim)
 
  On 08/10/2015 05:54 AM, pablo najt wrote:
   Thank you Doug.
   I run permutations with mdi_glmfit-sim --sim perm. Would you be able
   to advice on the output and how to open the permutation outputs? The
   tutorial instructs on how to open the *.summary file for the summary
   of clusters and *.sig.cluster.mgh the cluster corrected map, but not
   the permutation output.
   Thank you,
   Pablo
  
   
 
   Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:53:55 -0400
   From: gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Correction for multiple comparisons - qdec
  
   You can try permutation, though it is often more constraining than
   those other two options. To do this, you'll need to run 
 mri_glmfit-sim
   from the command line using the --sim perm option. Run it with --help
   to get examples
  
   On 8/7/15 6:59 AM, pablo najt wrote:
  
   Dear FS experts,
   I have a question about running corrections for multiple
   comparisons. I am finding a fairly large cluster analyzing 2
   groups on sulcal depth. However when I tried FDR or cluster wise
   correction the results do not seem to survive. As the result is on
   the region I was predicting I want to make sure there are no other
   options for correcting for multiple comparisons. I am including a
   figure of my result to give you an idea of the size of the
   cluster. Do you have any suggestions for trying alternative ways
   of correcting?
   Thank you in advance,
   Pablo
  
  
  
   ___
   Freesurfer mailing list
   Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
  
  
  
   ___ Freesurfer mailing
   list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The
   information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
   is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and
   the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners
   Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If 
 the
   e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient
   information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the 
 e-mail.
  
  
   ___
   Freesurfer mailing list
   Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
  --
  Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
  MGH-NMR Center
  gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  Phone Number: 617-724-2358
  Fax: 617-726-7422
 
  Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
  FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
  www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
  Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] Query about transformations in the recon-all

2015-08-18 Thread chenhf_uestc
Hi, Bruce 

Thanks for your reply. Another question is 
What is talairach transformation procedure (This computes the affine transform 
from the orig volume to the MNI305 atlas using the  MINC program mritotal (see 
Collins, et al, 1994) through a FreeSurfer script called talairach). Why I need 
to transform from native space to MNI305 (We perform recon-all in the native 
space)?

Best,
Feng





发件人:Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
发送时间:2015-08-18 22:09
主题:Re: [Freesurfer] Query about transformations in the recon-all
收件人:Freesurfer support listfreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
抄送:

Hi Feng 

we compute many transforms for many reasons. The em reg is computed once  
in the image with skull to help with skull stripping, then again to the GCA  
atlas to initialize the nonlinear transform for computing the aseg  
segmentation. 

cheers 
Bruce 


On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, chenhf_uestc wrote: 

 Dear Freesurfer experts, 
   
 I have some questions in the recon-all. After reading online manual and 
 discussing with the experts in 
 the maillist, I have known all the recon-all procedures performed in the 
 individual native space. 
 However, I very confuse that there are many transformations in the recon-all, 
 e.g., 1. talairach 
 transformation (This computes the affine transform from the orig volume to 
 the MNI305 atlas using the 
 MINC program mritotal (see Collins, et al, 1994) through a FreeSurfer script 
 called talairach), why I 
 need transform from native space to MNI305; 2. EM (GCA) Registration 
 (Computes transform to align the 
 mri/nu.mgz volume to the default GCA atlas found in FREESURFER_HOME/average). 
 What is the GCA atlas? 
 what is the usage of this atlas? 3. CA Register (Computes a nonlinear 
 transform to align with GCA 
 atlas. Creates the file mri/transform/talairach.m3z). Why we should align 
 with GCA atlas? This 
 transform is nonlinear, and what is the transform in the EM (GCA) 
 Registration (Affine? 12 dof?); 4. 
 EM Registration, with Skull (Computes transform to align volume 
 mri/nu_noneck.mgz with GCA volume 
 possessing the skull); 
   
 Is there any detailed documentation in the online manual to introduce these 
 transformation? Could 
 anyone give me a website? 
   
 Any help would be greatly appreciate. 
   
 Best, 
 Feng 
   
  
 
___ 
Freesurfer mailing list 
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
at 
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error 
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
properly 
dispose of the e-mail. ___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.