Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) codebase as a separate patch. So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other issues raised here, over the next release. Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more comfortable with changing your opinion\vote? +1 On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Alexander Bezzubov abezzu...@nflabs.com wrote: Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation! On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) codebase as a separate patch. So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other issues raised here, over the next release. Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more comfortable with changing your opinion\vote? Please let us know. Thanks in advance. -- Kind regards, Alexander On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that this particular contribution is covered by https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53 (as we use the code from https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution) It depends on how that original code is licensed and if you have permission to use the code from the author. I don't know the exact particulars, and it may be fine, but it seem unclear to me. This probably doesn’t have to be sorted in the this release but would need to be sorted before graduation, but other IPMC member may hold different opinions. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- -- Kind regards, Alexander. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
+1 (binding) jan i. On 22 July 2015 at 10:31, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) codebase as a separate patch. So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other issues raised here, over the next release. Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more comfortable with changing your opinion\vote? +1 On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Alexander Bezzubov abezzu...@nflabs.com wrote: Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation! On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) codebase as a separate patch. So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other issues raised here, over the next release. Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more comfortable with changing your opinion\vote? Please let us know. Thanks in advance. -- Kind regards, Alexander On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that this particular contribution is covered by https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53 (as we use the code from https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution) It depends on how that original code is licensed and if you have permission to use the code from the author. I don't know the exact particulars, and it may be fine, but it seem unclear to me. This probably doesn’t have to be sorted in the this release but would need to be sorted before graduation, but other IPMC member may hold different opinions. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- -- Kind regards, Alexander. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Hi, Vote to release Apache Zeppelin 0.5.0-incubating passed with the following results: 4 binding +1 votes, no 0 or -1 votes. IPMC binding votes were provided by: Konstantin Boudnik Justin Mclean Edward J. Yoon Jan Iversen Here's vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201507.mbox/%3CCALf24satNWiQ%3DK4jvKE%2BDtByMa1JR1d68iLG2hoXnETe_3QUfQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E Thanks to all who helped make this release possible! On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:45 PM moon soo Lee m...@apache.org wrote: Thanks all IPMC for kind assistance. I'll send vote result email and proceed next steps. Thanks, moon On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:52 AM jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 23 July 2015 at 01:49, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: Given that issues were addressed (or are work in progress) and the 72 hours window has passed (eg anyone who wanted to chime in had a chance to do it) I'd call the vote and send the official result email to this list. Then follow with the rest of required steps like moving artifacts, etc. Agree the 72 hours is the key. But please it is custom when calling a vote to set a deadline. Congrats with the release. rgds jan i. Thanks Cos On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:31PM, moon soo Lee wrote: Thanks everyone for valuable concern and comment to the first release of Apache Zeppelin (incubating). Like Alexander mentioned, community will quickly address issues raised here, over the next release. I'd like to learn more how the vote goes. While this vote has four +1, is it okay to close this vote and post result or are there more things to consider? Best, moon On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:13 AM Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: Thank you guys for resolving the raised issues so quickly! Cos On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:25PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation! On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) codebase as a separate patch. So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other issues raised here, over the next release. Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more comfortable with changing your opinion\vote? Please let us know. Thanks in advance. -- Kind regards, Alexander On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that this particular contribution is covered by https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53 (as we use the code from https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution) It depends on how that original code is licensed and if you have permission to use the code from the author. I don't know the exact particulars, and it may be fine, but it seem unclear to me. This probably doesn’t have to be sorted in the this release but would need to be sorted before graduation, but other IPMC member may hold different opinions. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- -- Kind regards, Alexander. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Thanks all IPMC for kind assistance. I'll send vote result email and proceed next steps. Thanks, moon On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:52 AM jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 23 July 2015 at 01:49, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: Given that issues were addressed (or are work in progress) and the 72 hours window has passed (eg anyone who wanted to chime in had a chance to do it) I'd call the vote and send the official result email to this list. Then follow with the rest of required steps like moving artifacts, etc. Agree the 72 hours is the key. But please it is custom when calling a vote to set a deadline. Congrats with the release. rgds jan i. Thanks Cos On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:31PM, moon soo Lee wrote: Thanks everyone for valuable concern and comment to the first release of Apache Zeppelin (incubating). Like Alexander mentioned, community will quickly address issues raised here, over the next release. I'd like to learn more how the vote goes. While this vote has four +1, is it okay to close this vote and post result or are there more things to consider? Best, moon On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:13 AM Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: Thank you guys for resolving the raised issues so quickly! Cos On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:25PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation! On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) codebase as a separate patch. So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other issues raised here, over the next release. Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more comfortable with changing your opinion\vote? Please let us know. Thanks in advance. -- Kind regards, Alexander On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that this particular contribution is covered by https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53 (as we use the code from https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution) It depends on how that original code is licensed and if you have permission to use the code from the author. I don't know the exact particulars, and it may be fine, but it seem unclear to me. This probably doesn’t have to be sorted in the this release but would need to be sorted before graduation, but other IPMC member may hold different opinions. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- -- Kind regards, Alexander. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Thank you guys for resolving the raised issues so quickly! Cos On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:25PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation! On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) codebase as a separate patch. So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other issues raised here, over the next release. Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more comfortable with changing your opinion\vote? Please let us know. Thanks in advance. -- Kind regards, Alexander On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that this particular contribution is covered by https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53 (as we use the code from https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution) It depends on how that original code is licensed and if you have permission to use the code from the author. I don't know the exact particulars, and it may be fine, but it seem unclear to me. This probably doesn’t have to be sorted in the this release but would need to be sorted before graduation, but other IPMC member may hold different opinions. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- -- Kind regards, Alexander. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Given that issues were addressed (or are work in progress) and the 72 hours window has passed (eg anyone who wanted to chime in had a chance to do it) I'd call the vote and send the official result email to this list. Then follow with the rest of required steps like moving artifacts, etc. Thanks Cos On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:31PM, moon soo Lee wrote: Thanks everyone for valuable concern and comment to the first release of Apache Zeppelin (incubating). Like Alexander mentioned, community will quickly address issues raised here, over the next release. I'd like to learn more how the vote goes. While this vote has four +1, is it okay to close this vote and post result or are there more things to consider? Best, moon On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:13 AM Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: Thank you guys for resolving the raised issues so quickly! Cos On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:25PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation! On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) codebase as a separate patch. So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other issues raised here, over the next release. Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more comfortable with changing your opinion\vote? Please let us know. Thanks in advance. -- Kind regards, Alexander On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that this particular contribution is covered by https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53 (as we use the code from https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution) It depends on how that original code is licensed and if you have permission to use the code from the author. I don't know the exact particulars, and it may be fine, but it seem unclear to me. This probably doesn’t have to be sorted in the this release but would need to be sorted before graduation, but other IPMC member may hold different opinions. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- -- Kind regards, Alexander. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
On 23 July 2015 at 01:49, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: Given that issues were addressed (or are work in progress) and the 72 hours window has passed (eg anyone who wanted to chime in had a chance to do it) I'd call the vote and send the official result email to this list. Then follow with the rest of required steps like moving artifacts, etc. Agree the 72 hours is the key. But please it is custom when calling a vote to set a deadline. Congrats with the release. rgds jan i. Thanks Cos On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:31PM, moon soo Lee wrote: Thanks everyone for valuable concern and comment to the first release of Apache Zeppelin (incubating). Like Alexander mentioned, community will quickly address issues raised here, over the next release. I'd like to learn more how the vote goes. While this vote has four +1, is it okay to close this vote and post result or are there more things to consider? Best, moon On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:13 AM Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: Thank you guys for resolving the raised issues so quickly! Cos On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:25PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation! On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) codebase as a separate patch. So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other issues raised here, over the next release. Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more comfortable with changing your opinion\vote? Please let us know. Thanks in advance. -- Kind regards, Alexander On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that this particular contribution is covered by https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53 (as we use the code from https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution) It depends on how that original code is licensed and if you have permission to use the code from the author. I don't know the exact particulars, and it may be fine, but it seem unclear to me. This probably doesn’t have to be sorted in the this release but would need to be sorted before graduation, but other IPMC member may hold different opinions. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- -- Kind regards, Alexander. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Thanks everyone for valuable concern and comment to the first release of Apache Zeppelin (incubating). Like Alexander mentioned, community will quickly address issues raised here, over the next release. I'd like to learn more how the vote goes. While this vote has four +1, is it okay to close this vote and post result or are there more things to consider? Best, moon On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:13 AM Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: Thank you guys for resolving the raised issues so quickly! Cos On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:25PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation! On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) codebase as a separate patch. So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other issues raised here, over the next release. Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more comfortable with changing your opinion\vote? Please let us know. Thanks in advance. -- Kind regards, Alexander On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that this particular contribution is covered by https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53 (as we use the code from https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution) It depends on how that original code is licensed and if you have permission to use the code from the author. I don't know the exact particulars, and it may be fine, but it seem unclear to me. This probably doesn’t have to be sorted in the this release but would need to be sorted before graduation, but other IPMC member may hold different opinions. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- -- Kind regards, Alexander. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Got it, thank you very much, Justin, for the explanation! On behalf of the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) PPMC I have contacted the original author and he agreed to contribute this code, with the proper Apache 2.0 licence header, directly to the Apache Zeppelin (incubating) codebase as a separate patch. So it is going to be resolved completely, together with 2 other issues raised here, over the next release. Edward J. Yoon, does this explanation and actions taken make you more comfortable with changing your opinion\vote? Please let us know. Thanks in advance. -- Kind regards, Alexander On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that this particular contribution is covered by https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53 (as we use the code from https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution) It depends on how that original code is licensed and if you have permission to use the code from the author. I don't know the exact particulars, and it may be fine, but it seem unclear to me. This probably doesn’t have to be sorted in the this release but would need to be sorted before graduation, but other IPMC member may hold different opinions. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- -- Kind regards, Alexander. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Thanks to Justin for his thorough review, as always. I have pinged back the Apache Zeppelin community to see if we could quickly address the issue. - Henry On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Has the author of zeppelin-server/src/test/java/com/webautomation/ScreenCaptureHtmlUnitDriver.java signed a ICLA? It looks like came from Selenium community - https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/selenium-developers/Ivan$20Vasiliev$20%7Csort:relevance/selenium-developers/PTR_j4xLVRM/k2yVq01Fa7oJ If license header can't be attached discretionally by a third party, I don't think this can be included. -1 (binding) I think it'd be nice to fix every LICENSE and NOTICE issues. On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, +1 binding Please fix the LICENSE/NOTICE issues are fixed for next release. Given everything involved is Apache comparable it's more a documentation issue but still important to get right. If you need a hand or need it reviewed before your next release just ask. The LICENSE/NOTICE issues and missing DISCLAIMER from the binary files is more serious and IMO they shouldn’t be released but I’ll leave that up to the PMC/IPMC. I checked: - signatures and hashes good - incubating in source file - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE isn’t correct (see below) - NOTICE also has issues (see below) - All source has apache headers (except one) - No unexpected binary files - Can compile from source LICENSE and NOTICE issues - LICENSE states Copyright 2014, NFLabs inc.” when it should be ASF and specified in the NOTICE file. - NOTICE contains Font Awesome (SIL + MIT), Ace (BSD), Simple line icons (MIT) but there is no need for these to be in NOTICE [1] - LICENSE should contain things mentioned in NOTICE [1] - Has the author of zeppelin-server/src/test/java/com/webautomation/ScreenCaptureHtmlUnitDriver.java signed a ICLA? I notice it’s missing a header and it’s not 100% clear to me what it’s licensing is. For the binary release: - Missing NOTICE and DISCLAIMER from top level directory - Unadorned LICENSE and NOTICE in META_INF or jar and war so not correct, please see [2]. There's several NOTICE files in the libs jars that would have an impact on the binary NOTICE file [3] Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Hi, Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that this particular contribution is covered by https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53 (as we use the code from https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution) It depends on how that original code is licensed and if you have permission to use the code from the author. I don't know the exact particulars, and it may be fine, but it seem unclear to me. This probably doesn’t have to be sorted in the this release but would need to be sorted before graduation, but other IPMC member may hold different opinions. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Apologies for not timely response. Thank you Konstantin and Justin for your reviews - we have filed the issues to track that your feedback is going to be addressed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-174 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-175 Regarding the issue raised by Edward - we were under impression that this particular contribution is covered by https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/NOTICE#L53 (as we use the code from https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=1361 that was not merged to the selenium, keeping the attribution) Please let me know in case if that is not enough and we will be glad to address it asap to reconcile the -1. Thanks in advance! On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to Justin for his thorough review, as always. I have pinged back the Apache Zeppelin community to see if we could quickly address the issue. - Henry On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Has the author of zeppelin-server/src/test/java/com/webautomation/ScreenCaptureHtmlUnitDriver.java signed a ICLA? It looks like came from Selenium community - https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/selenium-developers/Ivan$20Vasiliev$20%7Csort:relevance/selenium-developers/PTR_j4xLVRM/k2yVq01Fa7oJ If license header can't be attached discretionally by a third party, I don't think this can be included. -1 (binding) I think it'd be nice to fix every LICENSE and NOTICE issues. On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, +1 binding Please fix the LICENSE/NOTICE issues are fixed for next release. Given everything involved is Apache comparable it's more a documentation issue but still important to get right. If you need a hand or need it reviewed before your next release just ask. The LICENSE/NOTICE issues and missing DISCLAIMER from the binary files is more serious and IMO they shouldn’t be released but I’ll leave that up to the PMC/IPMC. I checked: - signatures and hashes good - incubating in source file - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE isn’t correct (see below) - NOTICE also has issues (see below) - All source has apache headers (except one) - No unexpected binary files - Can compile from source LICENSE and NOTICE issues - LICENSE states Copyright 2014, NFLabs inc.” when it should be ASF and specified in the NOTICE file. - NOTICE contains Font Awesome (SIL + MIT), Ace (BSD), Simple line icons (MIT) but there is no need for these to be in NOTICE [1] - LICENSE should contain things mentioned in NOTICE [1] - Has the author of zeppelin-server/src/test/java/com/webautomation/ScreenCaptureHtmlUnitDriver.java signed a ICLA? I notice it’s missing a header and it’s not 100% clear to me what it’s licensing is. For the binary release: - Missing NOTICE and DISCLAIMER from top level directory - Unadorned LICENSE and NOTICE in META_INF or jar and war so not correct, please see [2]. There's several NOTICE files in the libs jars that would have an impact on the binary NOTICE file [3] Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- -- Kind regards, Alexander. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Has the author of zeppelin-server/src/test/java/com/webautomation/ScreenCaptureHtmlUnitDriver.java signed a ICLA? It looks like came from Selenium community - https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/selenium-developers/Ivan$20Vasiliev$20%7Csort:relevance/selenium-developers/PTR_j4xLVRM/k2yVq01Fa7oJ If license header can't be attached discretionally by a third party, I don't think this can be included. -1 (binding) I think it'd be nice to fix every LICENSE and NOTICE issues. On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, +1 binding Please fix the LICENSE/NOTICE issues are fixed for next release. Given everything involved is Apache comparable it's more a documentation issue but still important to get right. If you need a hand or need it reviewed before your next release just ask. The LICENSE/NOTICE issues and missing DISCLAIMER from the binary files is more serious and IMO they shouldn’t be released but I’ll leave that up to the PMC/IPMC. I checked: - signatures and hashes good - incubating in source file - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE isn’t correct (see below) - NOTICE also has issues (see below) - All source has apache headers (except one) - No unexpected binary files - Can compile from source LICENSE and NOTICE issues - LICENSE states Copyright 2014, NFLabs inc.” when it should be ASF and specified in the NOTICE file. - NOTICE contains Font Awesome (SIL + MIT), Ace (BSD), Simple line icons (MIT) but there is no need for these to be in NOTICE [1] - LICENSE should contain things mentioned in NOTICE [1] - Has the author of zeppelin-server/src/test/java/com/webautomation/ScreenCaptureHtmlUnitDriver.java signed a ICLA? I notice it’s missing a header and it’s not 100% clear to me what it’s licensing is. For the binary release: - Missing NOTICE and DISCLAIMER from top level directory - Unadorned LICENSE and NOTICE in META_INF or jar and war so not correct, please see [2]. There's several NOTICE files in the libs jars that would have an impact on the binary NOTICE file [3] Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:51PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Hi Cos, Thanks for providing a thoughtfully documented review. On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) Please consider fixing in the next release: - sha checksum is formatted in a way that makes automatic validation (with sha512sum -c ) impossible. Also, it'd be better to make sha512 suffix for the checksum file. sha is too ambiguous. - md5sum file is pretty much useless considering its weak security properties. Perhaps makes sense to get rid of it? As of a few months ago, requirements regarding cryptographic sums and signatures have been codified in a section of the Release Distribution Policy, curated by VP Infrastructure. http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums If you wanted to make a proposal regarding removal of MD5 checksums, infrastructure-dev@apache is the place to go. Ah... I've missed that part. Taking back md5sum comment. Thanks! Cos The format required by sha512sum is a bit of a pain to produce on systems where sha512sum itself is not available. For a Mac, or any other system where Perl is present, something like this will work: perl -MDigest -e '$d = Digest-new(MD5); open $fh, \ , apache-foo-1.2.3.tar.gz or die; $d-addfile($fh); \ print $d-hexdigest; print apache-foo-1.2.3.tar.gz\n' \ apache-foo-1.2.3.tar.gz.md5 I'm sure there are other hack invocations possible with other tools. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Hi, +1 binding Please fix the LICENSE/NOTICE issues are fixed for next release. Given everything involved is Apache comparable it's more a documentation issue but still important to get right. If you need a hand or need it reviewed before your next release just ask. The LICENSE/NOTICE issues and missing DISCLAIMER from the binary files is more serious and IMO they shouldn’t be released but I’ll leave that up to the PMC/IPMC. I checked: - signatures and hashes good - incubating in source file - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE isn’t correct (see below) - NOTICE also has issues (see below) - All source has apache headers (except one) - No unexpected binary files - Can compile from source LICENSE and NOTICE issues - LICENSE states Copyright 2014, NFLabs inc.” when it should be ASF and specified in the NOTICE file. - NOTICE contains Font Awesome (SIL + MIT), Ace (BSD), Simple line icons (MIT) but there is no need for these to be in NOTICE [1] - LICENSE should contain things mentioned in NOTICE [1] - Has the author of zeppelin-server/src/test/java/com/webautomation/ScreenCaptureHtmlUnitDriver.java signed a ICLA? I notice it’s missing a header and it’s not 100% clear to me what it’s licensing is. For the binary release: - Missing NOTICE and DISCLAIMER from top level directory - Unadorned LICENSE and NOTICE in META_INF or jar and war so not correct, please see [2]. There's several NOTICE files in the libs jars that would have an impact on the binary NOTICE file [3] Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Hi all, Apache Zeppelin community has voted on following RC to be releaseed as official Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating release. Since this is first release after under Apache Incubator, we would like to hear more feedback from incubator community and please help to verify and vote our release candidte. Vote on dev list: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-zeppelin-dev/201507.mbox/%3CCALf24sZYNnzyg1teG6vxT6EYMzA+Noj-Qxxg=ni46foecl2...@mail.gmail.com%3E Result of vote on dev list: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-zeppelin-dev/201507.mbox/%3ccalf24sz9qckkn2a3e+ocxuwkakyhvrwgqbng3oenp2xjzdt...@mail.gmail.com%3E The commit id is 5f5958a045147e0cf965d8840a55415d298a4e9f: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-zeppelin.git;a=commit;h=5f5958a045147e0cf965d8840a55415d298a4e9f This corresponds to the tag: v0.5.0: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-zeppelin.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v0.5.0 The release archives (tgz), signature, and checksums are here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/zeppelin/0.5.0-incubating-rc1/ The release candidate consists of the following source distribution archive: zeppelin-0.5.0-incubating.tgz In addition, the following supplementary binary distributions are provided for user convenience at the same location: zeppelin-0.5.0-incubating-bin-spark-1.3.1_hadoop-2.3.tgz zeppelin-0.5.0-incubating-bin-spark-1.4.0_hadoop-2.3.tgz The maven artifacts are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezeppelin-1000/org/apache/zeppelin/ You can find the KEYS file here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/zeppelin/KEYS Release notes available at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316221version=12329850 Vote will be open for next 72 hours (close at 6am 20/July PDT). [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Best regards,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
Hi Cos, Thanks for providing a thoughtfully documented review. On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) Please consider fixing in the next release: - sha checksum is formatted in a way that makes automatic validation (with sha512sum -c ) impossible. Also, it'd be better to make sha512 suffix for the checksum file. sha is too ambiguous. - md5sum file is pretty much useless considering its weak security properties. Perhaps makes sense to get rid of it? As of a few months ago, requirements regarding cryptographic sums and signatures have been codified in a section of the Release Distribution Policy, curated by VP Infrastructure. http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums If you wanted to make a proposal regarding removal of MD5 checksums, infrastructure-dev@apache is the place to go. The format required by sha512sum is a bit of a pain to produce on systems where sha512sum itself is not available. For a Mac, or any other system where Perl is present, something like this will work: perl -MDigest -e '$d = Digest-new(MD5); open $fh, \ , apache-foo-1.2.3.tar.gz or die; $d-addfile($fh); \ print $d-hexdigest; print apache-foo-1.2.3.tar.gz\n' \ apache-foo-1.2.3.tar.gz.md5 I'm sure there are other hack invocations possible with other tools. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating
+1 (binding) Checked the sha checksum and the signature - Ok. Built/ran RAT check - Ok. Some tests are failing during the verify phase, but I guess it doesn't make the release invalid. Please consider fixing in the next release: - sha checksum is formatted in a way that makes automatic validation (with sha512sum -c ) impossible. Also, it'd be better to make sha512 suffix for the checksum file. sha is too ambiguous. - md5sum file is pretty much useless considering its weak security properties. Perhaps makes sense to get rid of it? - there are older release artifacts hanging in the dev branch: please get rid of the them if they were properly released - it's confusing. Thanks! Cos P.S. I am not receiving dev@ emails although I am positive I am a part of it ;( On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:38PM, moon soo Lee wrote: Hi all, Apache Zeppelin community has voted on following RC to be releaseed as official Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.0-incubating release. Since this is first release after under Apache Incubator, we would like to hear more feedback from incubator community and please help to verify and vote our release candidte. Vote on dev list: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-zeppelin-dev/201507.mbox/%3CCALf24sZYNnzyg1teG6vxT6EYMzA+Noj-Qxxg=ni46foecl2...@mail.gmail.com%3E Result of vote on dev list: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-zeppelin-dev/201507.mbox/%3ccalf24sz9qckkn2a3e+ocxuwkakyhvrwgqbng3oenp2xjzdt...@mail.gmail.com%3E The commit id is 5f5958a045147e0cf965d8840a55415d298a4e9f: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-zeppelin.git;a=commit;h=5f5958a045147e0cf965d8840a55415d298a4e9f This corresponds to the tag: v0.5.0: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-zeppelin.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v0.5.0 The release archives (tgz), signature, and checksums are here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/zeppelin/0.5.0-incubating-rc1/ The release candidate consists of the following source distribution archive: zeppelin-0.5.0-incubating.tgz In addition, the following supplementary binary distributions are provided for user convenience at the same location: zeppelin-0.5.0-incubating-bin-spark-1.3.1_hadoop-2.3.tgz zeppelin-0.5.0-incubating-bin-spark-1.4.0_hadoop-2.3.tgz The maven artifacts are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezeppelin-1000/org/apache/zeppelin/ You can find the KEYS file here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/zeppelin/KEYS Release notes available at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316221version=12329850 Vote will be open for next 72 hours (close at 6am 20/July PDT). [ ] +1 approve [ ] 0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Best regards, - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
