Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-15 Thread Matt Hogstrom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

+1 (binding)

Past the 72 hour notation below but I didn't see a final tally.

On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:

 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
 
 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, 
 I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache 
 Incubator project.
 
 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a 
 link to the document in the wiki:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207
 
 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan 
 and review the archives for this month:
 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
 
 Please cast your votes:
 
 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
 
 This vote will close 72 hours from now.
 
 - Sam Ruby
 
 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a 
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation 
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is released 
 on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with more 
 [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a mature  
 [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]]. !OpenOffice.org is 
 localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.
 
 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the 
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle, namely:
 
 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that  will 
 run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and  data 
 through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.
 
 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user facing 
 product with many existing individual and corporate users, this project will 
 also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user forums, document 
 template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to further enable 
 !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in document automation 
 scenarios.
 
 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems in 
 June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of 
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun 
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.  
 !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its most 
 recent major version, the 3.x series saw over 
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
  million downloads]] in its first year.  The 
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
  recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.
 
 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and 
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage 
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or 
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are 
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral 
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.
 
 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the 
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open 
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org 
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to 
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable 
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a 
 collaborative fashion.
 
 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org contribution, 
 providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.
 
 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS Open 
 Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and 
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related 
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the application 
 or solution that best meets their requirements.
 
 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference implementation 
 of the Open Document Format standard.
 
 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We are 
 particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal, that 
 there is a strong role for non-coders 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-15 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 6/15/2011 9:58 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
 +1 (binding)
 
 Past the 72 hour notation below but I didn't see a final tally.

Then you missed the note.

[Hint: search for the subject RESULT]
---BeginMessage---
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:

 Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members.  Quorum
 is 3 binding +1 yes votes.  Once quorum is met, if more +1 votes are
 received than -1, the vote carries.  Otherwise, the vote fails.

Vote started on Friday, June 10th at 12:02pm EDT:

  http://s.apache.org/VgS

Voting is now closed.  Quorum was achieved, and the vote passes.
Voting results:

--- Summary ---

Binding:
+1: 41
--: 1
-0: 1
-1: 5

Non-binding:
+1: 45
+0: 2
±0: 1
-0: 1
-1: 8

--- Details ---

Binding:
+1 aadamchikAndrus Adamchik
+1 adc  Alan Cabrera
+1 akarasuluAlex Karasulu
-- antelder Anthony Elder
+1 ate  Ate Douma
+1 bdelacretaz  Bertrand Delacretaz
+1 bimargulies  Benson Margulies
+1 brettBrett Porter
+1 clr  Craig Russell
+1 curcuru  Shane Curcuru
+1 danese   Danese Cooper
+1 dims Davanum Srinivas
+1 dirkxDirk-Willem van Gulik
+1 elecharnyEmmanuel Lecharny
-0 gnodet   Guillaume Nodet
+1 grobmeierChristian Grobmeier
+1 gstein   Greg Stein
+1 jim  Jim Jagielski
+1 joes Joe Schaefer
+1 jukkaJukka Zitting
+1 jvermillard  Julien Vermillard
+1 kevanKevan Lee Miller
+1 leosimonsLeo Simons
+1 lresende Luciano Resende
+1 marrsMarcel Offermans
+1 marvin   Marvin Humphrey
+1 mattmann Chris Mattmann
+1 mturkMladen Turk
-1 niallp   Niall Pemberton
+1 nick Nick Burch
-1 niclas   Par Niclas Hedhman
+1 noel Noel J. Bergman
+1 noirin   Noirin Plunkett
+1 paulsKarl Pauls
-1 psteitz  Phil Steitz
+1 rdonkin  Robert Burrell Donkin
+1 rgardler Ross Duncan Gardler
+1 rgoers   Ralph Goers
+1 rhirsch  Richard Hirsch
+1 rubysSam Ruby
-1 sanjiva  Sanjiva Weerawarana
+1 sdeboy   Scott Deboy
+1 stoddard Bill Stoddard
+1 struberg Mark Struberg
-1 twilliamsTim Williams
+1 upayaviraUpayavira
+1 wroweWilliam A. Rowe Jr.
+1 zwoopLeif Hedstrom

Non-binding:
+1 aaf  Alexei Fedotov
+0 aku  Andreas Kuckartz
+1 asavory  Andrew Savory
+1 bayard   Henri Yandell
+1 damjan   Damjan Jovanovic (v)
+1 eric Eric Charles
+1 edwardsmjMike Edwards
+1 florent  Florent André (v)
+1 jkosin   James Kosin
-1 stevel   Steve Loughran
+1 mikemccand   Michael McCandless
-1 niq  Nick Kew
+1 ngn  Niklas Gustavsson
+1 rickhall Richard S. Hall
-0 seelmann Stefan Seelmann
+1 scottbw  Scott Wilson
+1 sgalaSantiago Gala
+1 svanderwaal  Sander van der Waal
+1 wave Dave Fisher (v)
+1 yegorYegor Kozlov (v)
+1 ---  Eric Bachard (v)
+1 ---  Mathias Bauer (v)
-1 ---  Thorsten Behrens
+1 ---  Stephan Bergmann (v)
+1 ---  Raphael Bircher (v)
+1 ---  Andy Brown (v)
+1 ---  Alexandro Colorado (v)
-1 ---  Keith Curtis
-1 ---  Florian Effenberger
+1 ---  Roman H. Gelbort (v)
+1 ---  Pedro Giffuni
+1 ---  Larry Gusaas
+1 ---  Daniel Haischt
+1 ---  Dennis E. Hamilton (v)
+1 ---  Don Harbison (v)
+1 ---  Kazunari Hirano (v)
+1 ---  Christoph Jopp
+1 ---  Steve Lee (v)
+1 ---  Dieter Loeschky (v)
+1 ---  Ian Lynch (v)
+1 ---  Carl Marcum (v)
+1 ---  Marcus
+1 ---  Ingrid von der Mehden (v)
-1 ---  Volker Merschmann
+0 ---  Cor Nouws
+1 ---  Simon Phipps
±0 ---  Manfred A. Reiter
+1 ---  Phillip Rhodes (v)
+1 ---  Andrew Rist (v)
+1 ---  Jürgen Schmidt (v)
-1 ---  André Schnabel
+1 ---  Jomar Silva (v)
+1 ---  Louis Suárez-Potts (v)
+1 ---  Malte Timmermann (v)
+1 ---  Jochen Wiedmann
+1 ---  Donald Whytock
-1 ---  Simos Xenitellis

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



---End Message---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Steve Loughran

On 10/06/11 17:02, Sam Ruby wrote:

*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.

At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here
is a link to the document in the wiki:

http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to
scan and review the archives for this month:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser


Please cast your votes:

[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation



I may have missed the vote it being over a weekend and me not checking 
my mail until work hours, but being in GMT0BST I think I'm still in 
time. I've also read through the other votes to help shape my own.


-1 (non binding)

* This may not foster an OSS community -just split a growing one in a 
way that benefits two large vendors (Oracle, IBM) rather than the world 
as a whole. In particular, a large chunk of the ongoing LibreOffice team 
are against this proposal, and I'd be happier being on good terms with 
the rest of the OSS world than with anyone else.


* A code dump without the oracle engineering team is going to be a hard 
thing to work with. If the majority of people who work on the ASF 
codebase are IBM FTEs, the knowledge of the codebase doesn't spread, and 
when IBM decide to re-assign the engineers (as has happened with Axis 
and Harmony), the knowledge of the code will go away. Sanjiva can vouch 
for that, having helped pick up the pieces of one of those projects (and 
done a good job of it :)


* It's a mass-market consumer OSS project on a par with firefox, not the 
developer-centric tooling or server-side platforms we've historically 
been involved in. If my mother has a problem with OpenOffice on her 
(Ubuntu 10.4) laptop, I can't tell her to download SVN trunk and debug 
the problem then submit a patch, as she can't even get the font settings 
right in Yahoo! mail to stop it sending emails out in Courier 36.


* Although it's key download bandwidth may be on Windows, it is the key 
office-compatible platform in the Linux world, which is why I run it on 
all my office PCs. That bandwidth doesn't get measured, as it comes from 
the RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu, SuSE and, um, Oracle repositories. Linux 
hasn't suffered by being GPL, and IBM are happy to work within that 
license constraint, so why not say you want to stay on the trunk of the 
open-office derivative works? Embrace GPL!


* I don't see why the ASF should do Oracle any favours, not given their 
past behaviour w.r.t the Java TCK, and their apparent willingness to sue 
google on what may be apparent patent issues within the Apache codebase. 
You can't sue someone over one bit of code and then at the same time say 
let's be friends, on what may be just a way to gain some tax kickback 
by donating a half-dead brand to an open source project.


* I've not been happy with some of the discussions here were some of the 
evangelists of the proposal -who have never been seen on any ASF project 
I've ever encountered- suddenly seem to be knowledgeable about Apache's 
goals and intentions that myself. I get the feeling the ASF is being 
used as one of those pawns in a technology cold war we'll trade Cuba 
for Hungary. Case in point: press releases announced this before 
anything else, implies to me a propaganda effort rather than progress.


The momentum is with TdF, that's where its home should be, and the ASF, 
Oracle and IBM should accept and acknowledge that fact.



-Steve


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Raphael Bircher

+1 (non-binding)

Greetings Raphael

Am 10.06.11 18:02, schrieb Sam Ruby:

*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be 
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept 
OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project.


At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  
Here is a link to the document in the wiki:


http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to 
scan and review the archives for this month:


http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser 



Please cast your votes:

[  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

This vote will close 72 hours from now.

- Sam Ruby

= OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
== Abstract ==
!OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity 
applications: a word processor (and its web-authoring component), 
spreadsheet, presentation graphics, drawing, equation editor, and 
database. !OpenOffice.org is released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and 
Macintosh operation systems, with more 
[[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a 
mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]]. 
!OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.


== Proposal ==
Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the 
!OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle, 
namely:


To create, as a community, the leading international office suite 
that  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all 
functionality and  data through open-component based APIs and an 
XML-based file format.


In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user 
facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this 
project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, 
user forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will 
also work to further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a 
programmable module in document automation scenarios.


== Background ==
!OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun 
Microsystems in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed 
under the name of StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which 
was acquired by Sun Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open 
source in 2000.  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to 
MS-Office available.  Its most recent major version, the 3.x series 
saw over 
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100 
million downloads]] in its first year.  The 
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most 
recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.


The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral 
and scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the 
next-stage architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as 
separate applications or as embedded components in other applications. 
Numerous other features are also present including XML-based file 
formats based on the vendor-neutral !OpenDocument Format (ODF) 
standard from OASIS and other resources.


== Rationale ==
!OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following 
the contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its 
usual open development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the 
!OpenOffice.org development community, previously fragmented, would 
re-unite under ASF to ensure a stable and long term future for 
OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable corporate, non-profit, and volunteer 
stakeholders to contribute code in a collaborative fashion.


Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org 
contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing 
!OpenOffice.org.


Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the 
OASIS Open Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of 
developers, ISVs and Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of 
!OpenOffice.org and related solutions will own their document data, 
and be free to choose the application or solution that best meets 
their requirements.


The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference 
implementation of the Open Document Format standard.


= Current Status =
== Meritocracy ==
We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We 
are particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this 
proposal, that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in 
this meritocracy and as they demonstrate their sustained commitment 
and merit, to take on additional community responsibilities.


The initial 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Tim Williams
-1

As a foundation, we are optimized to support delivery of open source
code, it seems to me OOo and its user/community/the public would be
best served by an organization built for the delivery of a finished
end-user product.  OOo would be such an anomaly for us I fear would
lead to an embarrassing chapter.

--tim

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a
 link to the document in the wiki:

 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan
 and review the archives for this month:

 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby

 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is
 released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with
 more [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
 mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
 namely:

 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and
  data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
 forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to
 further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
 document automation scenarios.

 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems
 in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.
  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its
 most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
 million downloads]] in its first year.  The
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
 recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.

 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a
 collaborative fashion.

 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org contribution,
 providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.

 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS Open
 Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the
 application or solution that best meets their requirements.

 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference implementation
 of the Open Document Format standard.

 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the intention and value 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Dieter Loeschky

+1 (non-binding)

Regards,
Dieter



Am 10.06.11 18:02, schrieb Sam Ruby:

*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be 
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept 
OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project.


At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  
Here is a link to the document in the wiki:


http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to 
scan and review the archives for this month:


http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser 



Please cast your votes:

[  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

This vote will close 72 hours from now.

- Sam Ruby

= OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
== Abstract ==
!OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity 
applications: a word processor (and its web-authoring component), 
spreadsheet, presentation graphics, drawing, equation editor, and 
database. !OpenOffice.org is released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and 
Macintosh operation systems, with more 
[[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a 
mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]]. 
!OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.


== Proposal ==
Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the 
!OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle, 
namely:


To create, as a community, the leading international office suite 
that  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all 
functionality and  data through open-component based APIs and an 
XML-based file format.


In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user 
facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this 
project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, 
user forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will 
also work to further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a 
programmable module in document automation scenarios.


== Background ==
!OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun 
Microsystems in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed 
under the name of StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which 
was acquired by Sun Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open 
source in 2000.  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to 
MS-Office available.  Its most recent major version, the 3.x series 
saw over 
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100 
million downloads]] in its first year.  The 
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most 
recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.


The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral 
and scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the 
next-stage architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as 
separate applications or as embedded components in other applications. 
Numerous other features are also present including XML-based file 
formats based on the vendor-neutral !OpenDocument Format (ODF) 
standard from OASIS and other resources.


== Rationale ==
!OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following 
the contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its 
usual open development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the 
!OpenOffice.org development community, previously fragmented, would 
re-unite under ASF to ensure a stable and long term future for 
OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable corporate, non-profit, and volunteer 
stakeholders to contribute code in a collaborative fashion.


Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org 
contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing 
!OpenOffice.org.


Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the 
OASIS Open Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of 
developers, ISVs and Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of 
!OpenOffice.org and related solutions will own their document data, 
and be free to choose the application or solution that best meets 
their requirements.


The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference 
implementation of the Open Document Format standard.


= Current Status =
== Meritocracy ==
We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We 
are particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this 
proposal, that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in 
this meritocracy and as they demonstrate their sustained commitment 
and merit, to take on additional community responsibilities.


The initial 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Cor Nouws

Hi,

Sam Ruby wrote (10-06-11 18:02)

Please cast your votes:


a. - : because of the difficulties ahead, as mentioned on this list, for 
the OpenOffice.org product in the ASF (that may not be relevant for the 
AFS, but IMO are for OpenOffice.org), and since TDF for me is a more 
logical choice;


b. + : because the many people from the OpenOffice.org project that I 
know and want to give the Apache OpenOffice.org a chance, which I think 
is fair too.


Round (b-a) = +0 (non binding)

Kind regards,
Cor


[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

This vote will close 72 hours from now.


--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:02:44 -0400
Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:

-1 (non-binding)

I've agonised long and hard about this.  Wouldn't it be fantastic
to see Apache take on such a great trophy project?  And of course
we'll be best-of-friends with TDF despite perhaps a few vocal
individuals?  And in the worst case, incubation will show up
weaknesses and rifts and the project will be reevaluated, either
re-homed or pensioned off for TDF to pick over the bones.

But against that, why have we been offered it in the first place?
If this had happened before the split then I'd say great, but
now it smells of politics.

* Noone has explained why they want to donate to us in preference
  to TDF (the license issue doesn't wash given the history), only
  vague words about failing to reach agreement.
* It feels like we're being handed a fait accomplit: take this
  project, or the kitty dies.  Erm, excuse me?  I expect that
  kind of railroading from someone who's paying for my time
  and effort, not from someone who expects it for free.
  Granted it's not easy to explain to the press that it's not
  a done deal, but they could at least have made the effort.
* Who benefits?
  - Oracle and IBM have evidently decided it's in their interests.
Fine.  That's their business, not ours.
  - The competition?  MS has no direct interest.  Could go either
way for them, as for us.
  - TDF?  They get to cannibalise our work if they so choose.
But by the same token, that's work that wasn't contributed
to them in the first place.
  - The smaller companies?  I don't hear a unified voice.
  - The public?  More choice for the elite, confusion for the
many.  Too much kerfuffle in FOSS-land, better stick to MS.
  - ASF?  That's the only one that matters to us, isn't it?

* Well, we get a big trophy project, lots of attention.
  Good press if we make a success of it, bad press if we
  fail.  But that's asymmetric: the good press benefits
  us little (we don't need it), while the bad could seriously
  damage the brand.
* We also get a new project so big it's  sure to rock the boat,
  bring in a new culture.  Once it's in the incubator it has
  momentum: regardless of what happens, failure to graduate becomes
  an epic fail for us.
* We have a huge community to absorb: we don't know that their
  values match ours.  We do know that a number of them with
  Apache-like values of *community* and *open development*
  split off and formed TDF.  So perhaps those who *don't* share
  such values are overrepresented in the non-TDF community?
  We may be faced with individuals who are absolutely key to OOO
  yet incompatible with ASF, so we can neither take them on
  nor exclude them.
* It's outside our core competence.  This kind of takeover has
  been damaging for many ambitious corporations.


Having said all that, if we do accept it for incubation then
I'll be actively doing my best to make it a success.


-- 
Nick Kew

Available for work, contract or permanent.
http://www.webthing.com/~nick/cv.html

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[DISCUSS] how to add many committers to a new project (was: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation)

2011-06-13 Thread Leo Simons
Hey hey,

On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
 +1 binding.  Given the sheer number of committers involved in this podling
 there will be some work to do trying to gel a coherent development community
 out of the group.  While I am optimistic, I am reminded of Roy's cautions
 about piling on [1] to a prospective podling, and am not entirely convinced
 that it's necessarily a good thing that we promote the idea of getting in
 on the ground floor wrt new podlings.

 [1]- http://s.apache.org/VT5

Perhaps one approach the podling could take at the guidance of its
mentors is to create accounts on demand. I.e. first order of business
is getting basic infrastructure up (I think everyone is looking
forward to having traffic on general@incubator back to normal -:) ),
next up is getting the initial code import. Next after that you start
adding in the people that have sent in CLAs and are wanting to touch
the code/website/etc. That's what harmony did. It helped the project
get into a mode of voting in new people frequently, and it also helped
make visible to the project that it was ok if you didn't show up on
day 0.

cheers...

Leo

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] how to add many committers to a new project (was: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation)

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Schaefer
If you read Roy's thread you'd have known that what you're
suggesting was put forth by Noel, and Roy responded by basically
saying that putting mentors in charge of a codebase they
did not work on was a mistake:

http://s.apache.org/3h4



- Original Message 
 From: Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Mon, June 13, 2011 12:31:00 PM
 Subject: [DISCUSS] how to add many committers to a new project (was: Re: 
 [VOTE] 
Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation)
 
 Hey hey,
 
 On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com  wrote:
  +1 binding.  Given the sheer number of committers involved in  this podling
  there will be some work to do trying to gel a coherent  development 
community
  out of the group.  While I am optimistic, I am  reminded of Roy's cautions
  about piling on [1] to a prospective  podling, and am not entirely 
convinced
  that it's necessarily a good  thing that we promote the idea of getting in
  on the ground floor wrt  new podlings.
 
  [1]- http://s.apache.org/VT5
 
 Perhaps one  approach the podling could take at the guidance of its
 mentors is to create  accounts on demand. I.e. first order of business
 is getting basic  infrastructure up (I think everyone is looking
 forward to having traffic on  general@incubator back to normal -:) ),
 next up is getting the initial code  import. Next after that you start
 adding in the people that have sent in CLAs  and are wanting to touch
 the code/website/etc. That's what harmony did. It  helped the project
 get into a mode of voting in new people frequently, and it  also helped
 make visible to the project that it was ok if you didn't show up  on
 day  0.
 
 cheers...
 
 Leo
 
 -
 To  unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For  additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread JLCastle
I see this is too late to count but I offer my thoughts anyway.  
It was already late before it lurked in an outbox for a while.

[-1] (non-binding)  Vote to reject the OpenOffice.org PROPOSAL 

I reject the proposal not the community or the project.  

I am still a bit of an open source newb and do not have a long history
with either the code base, IP issues or the community.  
Please be free to correct or work around my misapprehensions.
Please accept my remarks as offered in the spirit of contribution to the
proposal's goal of continuing the creation, as a community, [of] the
leading international office suite.  

I am a TDF contributor but that is not the reason I reject the proposal
as it stands. 
I am powerfully drawn to contribute to ASF and the OO project, despite
my preference for an LGPL license. [1]   
I do not see the primary goals and interests of the Apache
OpenOffice.org community and the TDF community as divergent. 
I believe that all open source branches of the OpenOffice family tree
(linked by their still mostly common code base) will thrive best when
they all thrive.

The primary reasons I must reject this proposal (not the project!) come
from my understanding of ASF and from a few years of maintenance
development on a large old app: 

1) The Rationale doesn't work for me at all: 
Both Oracle and ASF agree that the OpenOffice.org development
community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to ensure a
stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org.  
-1A) This sentence speaks for ASF.  I have seen several emails where
this is frowned upon within the Apache community, but I will assume the
true Sponsor (the Incubator) can speak as ASF through the proposal (back
to itself?).  A bit convoluted for the Rationale.  More to the point is
TDF's first value: We commit ourselves to eliminate the digital divide
in society by giving everyone access to office productivity tools free
of charge to enable them to participate as full citizens in the 21st
century.  --
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Next_Decade_Manifesto
-1B) The 're-uniting a fragmented development community' meme is
disingenuous or just plain wrong.  The permissive nature of the Apache
license is called pragmatic because it is intended to allow and
encourage a variety of proprietary downstream development branches: this
is a fragmentation of development effort, nu?  Also, LibreOffice
development with its maturing timed release schedule and replacement of
OpenOffice in many Linux distros is neither a figment nor a fragment.  
-1C) The Rationale for the project might simply change 'agree' to
'intend' and 'would re-unite' to 'could re-unite' to break down the
resemblance to the Borg's infamous 'assumed close' technique. [2]  

2) The Meritocracy section is broken. Apache was chosen specifically
because Oracle as contributor, and IBM as Sponsor [...] want to
encourage this style of development for the project.  Leaving aside the
veracity, what does IBM as Sponsor mean?   The Incubator site says the
Sponsor must be part of Apache - here the true Sponsor is the Apache
Incubator.  And I don't think 'IBM as Sponsor of ASF' works either.
Open, democratic and transparent aren't about style - they are
requirements for success and graduation.

3) The missings:  
3A) Initial Goals section:
It is sudden (tho' not surprising), a bit of a mess, all new and there
is a lot to sort out.  
The Initial Goals could be a series of assertions of 'by when' critical
aspects will get sorted out.  
-- Accessible, buildable repo: Unless it's just about to happen, this is
initial goal 1.
-- If the build system, code, artwork, etc have IP issues that make a
dev repo unavailable then they become goal 0.
-- Germ of Release Plan: Release what? when? OK, then: By when goals set
= initial goal
-- Idea of Core Team: how many FTers? From where? How many others to
balance as community? Enough in #? Enough in coverage? How many
community + non-sponsored developers to balance that into a community
project? (by when have #s)

3B) There is other suggested content here --
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html --  that appears to be
germane in this case of a large, established (OO has code older than
Apache) project with a history checkered by 'management issues'.  

3C) The Community section is missing translators, help/doc and only
lists users and only infers the presence of national orgs with
supporter[sic], promoters, trainers, consultants, e.g., an extended
ecosystem. In fact, the whole Community section reads like a business
analysis: it speaks almost entirely about various releases. And as
either a business analysis or community description it fails to mention
the centralizing OOo brand. 

The flaws in Rationale, Meritocracy and Community with missing Initial
Goals all add up to this stopper: 
  --  The proposal doesn't just have hat problems, it looks like the
case of The Wrong Trousers. [3]

The proposal has existed a couple weeks and drawn 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Michael McCandless
+1

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
  [X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)

 Comment: While I favor focusing on the reference implementation for ODF, as 
 my previous comments reflect, I believe that and related scope decisions 
 about releases and deployment are a matter for the podling to work through.



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Manfred A. Reiter
 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation


+/- 0  (non binding)

I am still going back and forth, on whether or not.

against:
I understand very well most of the arguments from André
https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#inbox/1307a4afb87824f5

Please see here http://openoffice.org/projects/de/lists/users/archive
as the number of messages on the user mailing list is going down. We
are today by more or less 1/10th of the emails peak, we had on the
german userlist. I assume that the user did notice the wrangling
over OOo, and they were looking for alternatives. A product should be
released asap, ore OOo will loose more users.

I saw emails here during incubation which were not answere because
IMHO the questions were distressing. I heard here some caustically
notes, inappropriate to build a community.

Nearly the whole and very active community in Brasil switched to LO. A
lot of very brilliant and active members of the german community are
working now at LO, doing a very good job.

in favor:
On the other side, a lot of brilliant hackers are joining the project,
and I see a lot of experienced and honorable Hamburg-people ;-).

conclusion:
Are ASF people aware, that How the ASF works has to be rewritten?
A new role has to be created?  Enduser, because not every user of
OOo did what a ASF user has to do (i mean user in terms of
contributor).

IMHO, OOo and LO must find a way out of divide et impera.
I think it's not neccessary to explain who else might be interested in
a riven and broken community.

Doing the same things twice is not economic, it is inefficent and
worse it's stupid.

Manfred

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Alex Karasulu
+1 [binding]

Alex

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi,

On 10 June 2011 17:02, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:


 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.


+1 (non-binding)


Andrew.
--
asav...@apache.org / cont...@andrewsavory.com
http://www.andrewsavory.com/


Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

+1 (non-binding)

/niklas

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Marcus

+1 non-bindung



 From   Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
 Subject[VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
  Date  Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:02:44 GMT


 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Joe Schaefer
+1 binding.  Given the sheer number of committers involved in this podling
there will be some work to do trying to gel a coherent development community
out of the group.  While I am optimistic, I am reminded of Roy's cautions
about piling on [1] to a prospective podling, and am not entirely convinced
that it's necessarily a good thing that we promote the idea of getting in
on the ground floor wrt new podlings.



[1]- http://s.apache.org/VT5



- Original Message 
 From: Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Sent: Sun, June 12, 2011 11:21:26 AM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 
 On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net  wrote:
  As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be  winding
  down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
   Apache Incubator project.
 
 +1  (non-binding)
 
 /niklas
 
 -
 To  unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For  additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Shane Curcuru

[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
(binding)

- Shane

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:12 PM, IngridvdM ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
 [x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)

 I would like to humbly beg you people from Apache for giving a chance to
 those who are willing to join you. I am deeply sorry that we are bringing a
 big political dispute with us. My hope is that the community that was so
 heavily divided last year will be able to reunite on your neutral ground.

:-)

And I'd like to thanks everyone who took the time to contribute to the
discussion here on list and to express their opinion through this VOTE

Robert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)

I would like to see a future for OOo and i hope that this can be a new
start. A few words to myself because i wasn't really visible here on the
list so far. My name is Juergen Schmidt (jsc) and I have worked on the
project since 1997. Probably some of you know me already, i am the API and
Extensions project lead and currently also a member of the OOo community
council. A more detailed introduction will follow soon.

Juergen

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:

 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is
 a link to the document in the wiki:

 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan
 and review the archives for this month:


 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby

 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is
 released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with
 more [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
 mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
 namely:

 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and
  data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
 forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to
 further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
 document automation scenarios.

 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems
 in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.
  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its
 most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over [[
 http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100million
  downloads]] in its first year.  The [[
 http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|mostrecent
  estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.

 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a
 collaborative fashion.

 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org
 contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.

 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS
 Open Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the
 application or solution that best meets their requirements.

 The !OpenOffice.org 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Mathias Bauer
Sorry, I used a wrong mail address and then resent my vote with the 
correct one; please ignore this mail.


Regards,
Mathias

On 12.06.2011 15:51, Mathias Bauer wrote:

+1 (non-binding)

Regards,
Mathias

On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:

*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.

At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here
is a link to the document in the wiki:

http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to
scan and review the archives for this month:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser



Please cast your votes:

[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

This vote will close 72 hours from now.

- Sam Ruby

= OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
== Abstract ==
!OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications:
a word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet,
presentation graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database.
!OpenOffice.org is released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh
operation systems, with more
[[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
mature [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
!OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

== Proposal ==
Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
!OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
namely:

To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality
and data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
forums, document template repositories, etc. The project will also work
to further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
document automation scenarios.

== Background ==
!OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun
Microsystems in June 2000. !OpenOffice.org was originally developed
under the name of StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which
was acquired by Sun Microsystems in 1999. Sun released this as open
source in 2000. !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office
available. Its most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100

million downloads]] in its first year. The
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most

recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral
and scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the
next-stage architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate
applications or as embedded components in other applications. Numerous
other features are also present including XML-based file formats based
on the vendor-neutral !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and
other resources.

== Rationale ==
!OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual
open development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the
!OpenOffice.org development community, previously fragmented, would
re-unite under ASF to ensure a stable and long term future for
OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable corporate, non-profit, and volunteer
stakeholders to contribute code in a collaborative fashion.

Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org
contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing
!OpenOffice.org.

Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS
Open Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs
and Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and
related solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose
the application or solution that best meets their requirements.

The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference
implementation of the Open Document Format standard.

= Current Status =
== Meritocracy ==
We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache. We are
particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal,
that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in this
meritocracy and as they demonstrate their sustained 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Mathias Bauer

Sorry,

this was a mistake, I used a wrong mail address; ignore this posting, 
please.


regards,
Mathias

On 12.06.2011 15:51, Mathias Bauer wrote:

+1 (non-binding)

Regards,
Mathias

On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:

*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.

At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here
is a link to the document in the wiki:

http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to
scan and review the archives for this month:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser



Please cast your votes:

[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

This vote will close 72 hours from now.

- Sam Ruby

= OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
== Abstract ==
!OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications:
a word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet,
presentation graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database.
!OpenOffice.org is released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh
operation systems, with more
[[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
mature [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
!OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

== Proposal ==
Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
!OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
namely:

To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality
and data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
forums, document template repositories, etc. The project will also work
to further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
document automation scenarios.

== Background ==
!OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun
Microsystems in June 2000. !OpenOffice.org was originally developed
under the name of StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which
was acquired by Sun Microsystems in 1999. Sun released this as open
source in 2000. !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office
available. Its most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100

million downloads]] in its first year. The
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most

recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral
and scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the
next-stage architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate
applications or as embedded components in other applications. Numerous
other features are also present including XML-based file formats based
on the vendor-neutral !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and
other resources.

== Rationale ==
!OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual
open development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the
!OpenOffice.org development community, previously fragmented, would
re-unite under ASF to ensure a stable and long term future for
OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable corporate, non-profit, and volunteer
stakeholders to contribute code in a collaborative fashion.

Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org
contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing
!OpenOffice.org.

Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS
Open Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs
and Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and
related solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose
the application or solution that best meets their requirements.

The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference
implementation of the Open Document Format standard.

= Current Status =
== Meritocracy ==
We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache. We are
particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal,
that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in this
meritocracy and as they demonstrate their sustained commitment and
merit, to 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread dsh
Btw, your mails appear to be sent twice to the ML. I recognized that
before already...

Cheers
Daniel

On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de wrote:
 Sorry,

 this was a mistake, I used a wrong mail address; ignore this posting,
 please.

 regards,
 Mathias

 On 12.06.2011 15:51, Mathias Bauer wrote:

 +1 (non-binding)

 Regards,
 Mathias

 On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:

 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here
 is a link to the document in the wiki:

 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to
 scan and review the archives for this month:


 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser



 Please cast your votes:

 [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby

 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications:
 a word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet,
 presentation graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database.
 !OpenOffice.org is released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh
 operation systems, with more
 [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
 mature [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
 namely:

 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
 will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality
 and data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
 forums, document template repositories, etc. The project will also work
 to further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
 document automation scenarios.

 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun
 Microsystems in June 2000. !OpenOffice.org was originally developed
 under the name of StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which
 was acquired by Sun Microsystems in 1999. Sun released this as open
 source in 2000. !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office
 available. Its most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over

 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100

 million downloads]] in its first year. The

 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most

 recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral
 and scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the
 next-stage architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate
 applications or as embedded components in other applications. Numerous
 other features are also present including XML-based file formats based
 on the vendor-neutral !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and
 other resources.

 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual
 open development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the
 !OpenOffice.org development community, previously fragmented, would
 re-unite under ASF to ensure a stable and long term future for
 OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable corporate, non-profit, and volunteer
 stakeholders to contribute code in a collaborative fashion.

 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org
 contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing
 !OpenOffice.org.

 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS
 Open Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs
 and Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and
 related solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose
 the application or solution that best meets their requirements.

 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference
 implementation of the Open Document Format standard.

 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)

-Bertrand, who agrees with Dirk.

On Sunday, June 12, 2011, Dirk-Willem van Gulik di...@webweaving.org wrote:

 *: who is in a - what the hack mood - and thinks that  get this code base in 
 a state where people can start hacking is better than let it bitrot any 
 further. And fully trust the incubator process to attic the code  jettison 
 the community if it is non functional. In which case we have at least one 
 copy of this code base under a very liberal license for other communities to 
 use as a starting point.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Niall Pemberton
I vote -1 for the reasons I said here:

http://markmail.org/message/w5vtsa5nbarmnqxo

Niall

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a
 link to the document in the wiki:

 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan
 and review the archives for this month:

 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby

 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is
 released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with
 more [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
 mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
 namely:

 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and
  data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
 forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to
 further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
 document automation scenarios.

 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems
 in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.
  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its
 most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
 million downloads]] in its first year.  The
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
 recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.

 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a
 collaborative fashion.

 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org contribution,
 providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.

 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS Open
 Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the
 application or solution that best meets their requirements.

 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference implementation
 of the Open Document Format standard.

 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We are
 particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal,
 that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in this
 meritocracy and as they demonstrate their 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-12 Thread Malte Timmermann

Please ignore my vote below (duplicate).

I first used the wrong email address, which is not subscribed, then used 
the correct one, and didn't expect that someone would moderate the list 
and let the first one through...


Malte.

On 11.06.2011 17:59, Malte Timmermann wrote:

+1 (non-binding)

Malte.

On 10.06.2011 19:05, Sam Ruby wrote:

[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

- Sam Ruby

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Ralph Goers
+1

Ralph


On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
 
 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, 
 I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache 
 Incubator project.
 
 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a 
 link to the document in the wiki:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207
 
 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan 
 and review the archives for this month:
 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
 
 Please cast your votes:
 
 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
 
 This vote will close 72 hours from now.
 
 - Sam Ruby
 
 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a 
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation 
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is released 
 on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with more 
 [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a mature  
 [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]]. !OpenOffice.org is 
 localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.
 
 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the 
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle, namely:
 
 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that  will 
 run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and  data 
 through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.
 
 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user facing 
 product with many existing individual and corporate users, this project will 
 also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user forums, document 
 template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to further enable 
 !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in document automation 
 scenarios.
 
 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems in 
 June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of 
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun 
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.  
 !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its most 
 recent major version, the 3.x series saw over 
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
  million downloads]] in its first year.  The 
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
  recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.
 
 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and 
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage 
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or 
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are 
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral 
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.
 
 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the 
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open 
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org 
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to 
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable 
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a 
 collaborative fashion.
 
 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org contribution, 
 providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.
 
 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS Open 
 Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and 
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related 
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the application 
 or solution that best meets their requirements.
 
 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference implementation 
 of the Open Document Format standard.
 
 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We are 
 particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal, that 
 there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in this meritocracy and 
 as they demonstrate their sustained commitment and merit, to take on 
 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny

[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding).


--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Volker Merschmann
Hi,

I am wearing my OOo-hat here, and this is my vote:

[  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[X ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

I have contributed to OpenOffice.org for several years and I doubt
that the project will find the needed resources at Apache.

Bye

Volker

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[DISCUSSION] (was: RE: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation)

2011-06-11 Thread Gavin McDonald


 -Original Message-
 From: Volker Merschmann [mailto:merschm...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2011 6:49 PM
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 
 Hi,
 
 I am wearing my OOo-hat here, and this is my vote:
 
 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation [  ] +0 Indifferent to
 OpenOffice.org incubation [X ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
 
 I have contributed to OpenOffice.org for several years and I doubt that
the
 project will find the needed resources at Apache.

Hi Volker,

Please tell us what sort of 'resources' are you talking about, examples
please, are
these infrastructure resources? If so, as an infra person here at the ASF I
would
like some insight into what people think we don’t have or  cannot handle.

I have been researching myself online and with other folks including OOo
infra admins
and so far I haven’t found anything to make me think that this cannot be
done at
an infrastructure level.

Gav...

 
 Bye
 
 Volker
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSSION] (was: RE: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation)

2011-06-11 Thread Simon Brouwer

Hi Gavin,

Op 11-6-2011 10:59, Gavin McDonald schreef:

-Original Message-
From: Volker Merschmann [mailto:merschm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2011 6:49 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

Hi,

I am wearing my OOo-hat here, and this is my vote:

[  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation [  ] +0 Indifferent to
OpenOffice.org incubation [X ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

I have contributed to OpenOffice.org for several years and I doubt that

the

project will find the needed resources at Apache.

Hi Volker,

Please tell us what sort of 'resources' are you talking about, examples
please, are
these infrastructure resources? If so, as an infra person here at the ASF I
would
like some insight into what people think we don’t have or  cannot handle.


I'm not answering for Volker, but personally I see a big problem in the 
fact that the installation packages of OpenOffice.org as we know it 
today contain numerous external (mostly LGPL) libraries and binaries 
that are not ASL licensed and not covered under the Oracle grant.
As I understand, it is strict ASF policy not to distribute binaries 
containing non-ASL source, and it will be far from trivial to replace 
those dependencies. Therefore I expect that, even if OpenOffice.org can 
be built and distributed under these restrictions, it will be severely 
crippled for a long time to come. I foresee that many (prospective) 
OpenOffice.org-users will lose interest and that we won't be able to 
regain the momentum.


--

Vriendelijke groet,
Simon Brouwer.

| http://nl.openoffice.org | http://www.opentaal.org |


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Leo Simons
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

+1 from me (binding).

cheers,

Leo

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
+0 (non-binding)

I would likely have voted +1 if there were no existing Open Source
community behind LibreOffice.

The alleged(!) necessity to remove/replace LGPL libraries not covered by
the Oracle grant will not result in an improved free office suite but
only in delays and further incompatibilities with LibreOffice.

Cheers,
Andreas
---

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread André Schnabel

-1 (non-binding)

Within the discussion several reasons that might support a -1 vote were 
named, many have been addressed or may be addresed by the podling.


I still feel obligated to vote -1 because (even if the podling advances 
to a Apache TLP) this will be the end of OpenOffice.org as it is seen 
within the market.


Actually OpenOffice.org is an application with a user base  of 50Mio to 
100Mio users. And these users have their hands on the software day by 
day - so this is really different from zlib, which hardly any of it's 
users would know by name. Many administrations and companies have 
choosen OpenOffice.org as their office suite (we are speaking of 
installation from 10 up to 50k and more seats). There is a market around 
OpenOffice.org (books, support offerings, trainings, software 
integrations with mid-range ERP systems, even SAP is aware of the fact 
that OOo exists and had to deliver some ways of integration).


All this market is about *OpenOffice.org* it is *not* about derivates. 
Although Rob tried to give the impression that there are oh so many 
OOo derivates, the reality is, that the Office marked is ~89% MSO, 10% 
OOo and 1% for all the others. Even the better known derivates of OOo 
(StarOffice and Symphony) are far behind the visibility of the 
OpenOffice.org brand.


Rob did also an interesting analysis, that there is no need to come up 
quite fast with a new version of OOo, because there has been almost a 
year between the previous versions. While the fact is true, my resumee 
is different. During the last two years, we already saw the OOo marked 
in an uncertain situation - planned versions had been delayed for 
several reasons, nobody was able to answer, what the future would bring. 
Users and adopters became anxious. OpenOffice.org 3.4 was scheduled for 
May/June 2011 - yet another delay will not help the marked to prosper. 
Instead the OOo marked will go from stagnation to shrink.


Even if the podling will be able to produce a new version quite soon, it 
will be very different from the software we currently know as 
OpenOffice.org (at least from what I understand to be Apache's 
guidelines for software distribution). Integration to third party 
components needs to be rewritten or dropped - even simple things like 
preinstalled dictionaries (sounds really a no-brainer to a developer) 
are crucial for the marked that the current OOo addresses.



So to me, there is an extremely high risk that the Apache project will 
not fullfill the expectations of the current OOo user base. Although 
fully in line with the Apache guidelines and philosophy, it might fail, 
because 99.99% of the users are not interested in policy and guidelines 
- they just are interested in what they get (and if it is not Coke it 
is no Cola).

I hope, this will not reflect to Apache's reputation after all.


All that said, I perfectly know that the OOo project cannot continue 
like it did the last ten years, so something needs to change.
And although I am opposed to the project here at Apache I owe respect to 
anyone who is going to drive this and will be around to give input if 
needed.



regards,

André

PS.: As I did not yet send an introduction to the list, some information

- Working with Office Suites since 1988
- Joined the OOo project in 2002, starting with user support and 
documentations
- Co-Lead at the Germanophone project (having a great time with Manfred 
and felt very sad when he left)
- later Project lead for Quality assurance (quite active in bug handling 
and one of the first non-Sunnies to work on the scripts for test automation)
- elected Member of the OOo Community Council for several years (e.g. 
reworking the CC's bylaws for it's current version)
- coordinating the German Localization efforts (and doing about 50% of 
the UI translations since OOo 3.0)
- representing OOo and giving talks at at least 4 public events per year 
(like CEBit, LinuxTag, LinuxDay, OOoCon)
- founding member, member of the initial board and now member of the 
supervisory board of FrODev (former OOoDeV)
- founding member of The Document Foundation, member of the interim 
Steering Committe, member of the Membership Committee


Although my premise when entering OOo was that I will do anything but 
coding (as I do enough coding during my day job) there are ~20 Lines of 
code in OOo written by me :)





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

-1.

I think by accepting this ASF is risking quite a lot of flak and
reputational damage. We have too much baggage from IBM/Oracle in
recent past, to be played like this. Not seeing the deal being struck
between this and Harmony, or ignoring it, is a great injustice to
those individuals that put in their sweat in Harmony.

I sincerely think that this incubation will fail. I think IBM will
spend most 'innovation' in their downstream project and quite quickly
we will have a disrupted OpenOffice.org landscape, without any
shippable binaries for many platforms.

FTR, I hope that TDF will reconsider the stance on the Apache License
and joins this effort as an equal partner, in which case I applaud
those who made this happen and I would stand corrected. Prove me
wrong!!

Cheers
-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Mark Struberg
Yes, and I also like to correct my previous statement: I actually meant that 
ALL votes are welcome (not only +1)!

LieGrue,
strub

--- On Fri, 6/10/11, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:

 From: Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Date: Friday, June 10, 2011, 10:43 PM
 Mark Struberg wrote on Fri, Jun 10,
 2011 at 23:09:21 +0100:
  PS: I fear there is a misunderstanding regarding
 binding vs non-binding votes. Binding votes can only be cast
 by a IncubatorPMC member [1]. But of course, also
 non-binding +1 are welcome ;)
  
 
 I'm going to be less roundabout:
 
 Roman's vote is not binding since he's not on the IPMC.
 
  --- On Fri, 6/10/11, Roman H. Gelbort ro...@piensalibre.com.ar
 wrote:
  
   From: Roman H. Gelbort ro...@piensalibre.com.ar
   Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for
 incubation
   To: general@incubator.apache.org
   Date: Friday, June 10, 2011, 6:13 PM
   El 10/06/11 14:17, Roman H. Gelbort
   escribió:
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
   
   and binding
   
   -- 
  
 ---
   Prof. Román H. Gelbort
   No busquemos aplicaciones que reemplacen
 aplicaciones, 
   sino aplicaciones que resuelvan problemas
 específicos...
   
   http://www.piensalibre.com.ar
  
 ---
   
   
  
 -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
   
  
  
 
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
  
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Nóirín Plunkett
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)

N

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Upayavira
This is such a difficult call. Will OOo at Apache take off sufficiently
to contribute something of value to the ecosystem, or will it fail,
taking goodwill with it? Will it create division in the community, or
does that division already exist, and creating the podling will simply
make the fact of a division clearer, and therefore easier to work with?

Without the ability to see the future, I cannot fully answer these
questions. However, reading all of the threads on the topic, I come to
the conclusion that it is worth a try. 

Therefore, I vote +1, and wish all participants well and hope we can
make something excellent from this opportunity, something that benefits
all within the wider OOo community.

So +1 to this proposal.

Upayavira

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:02 -0400, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
wrote:
 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
 
 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding 
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an 
 Apache Incubator project.
 
 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here 
 is a link to the document in the wiki:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207
 
 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to 
 scan and review the archives for this month:
 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
 
 Please cast your votes:
 
 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
 
 This vote will close 72 hours from now.
 
 - Sam Ruby
 
 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: 
 a word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, 
 presentation graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. 
 !OpenOffice.org is released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh 
 operation systems, with more 
 [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a 
 mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]]. 
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.
 
 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the 
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle, 
 namely:
 
 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that 
   will run on all major platforms and provide access to all 
 functionality and  data through open-component based APIs and an 
 XML-based file format.
 
 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user 
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this 
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user 
 forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will also work 
 to further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in 
 document automation scenarios.
 
 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun 
 Microsystems in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed 
 under the name of StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which 
 was acquired by Sun Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open 
 source in 2000.  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office 
 available.  Its most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over 
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
  
 million downloads]] in its first year.  The 
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
  
 recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.
 
 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral 
 and scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the 
 next-stage architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate 
 applications or as embedded components in other applications. Numerous 
 other features are also present including XML-based file formats based 
 on the vendor-neutral !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and 
 other resources.
 
 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the 
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual 
 open development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the 
 !OpenOffice.org development community, previously fragmented, would 
 re-unite under ASF to ensure a stable and long term future for 
 OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable corporate, non-profit, and volunteer 
 stakeholders to contribute code in a collaborative fashion.
 
 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org 
 contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing
 !OpenOffice.org.
 
 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Thorsten Behrens
-1 (non-binding)

As stated elsewhere [1], this incubator, combined with the
disruption and delay it's causing to the OOo ecosystem, does not add
enough unique value to what we already have a TDF to justify the
effort.

(I'm referring to the existing proposal's mission statement [2], not
to the (quite sensible) visions invididuals have presented here)

[1] http://blog.thebehrens.net/2011/06/11/licensing-questions-and-the-ecosystem/
[2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal#Proposal

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


pgpCzgEcfSDnv.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Steve Lee
+1 (non-binding)

-- 
Steve Lee

Full Measure - open source accessibility - http://fullmeasure.co.uk

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Sam,

On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
 
 [X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

(binding). Good luck!

Cheers,
Chris

++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Christoph Jopp
 +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
(non-binding)


At first I thought beeing on the committers list would imply my approval
of the proposal. But now I'd like to give the reasons for my vote as so
many others did:

(All just my point of view as an suburban inhabitant of the old OOo
community)

TDF was and is important for the OpenOffice.org community and did and
does a great job. TDF came into existence just as many people of the OOo
community saw the project and the community in danger - to give a new
home to OOo. But still other parts of the community remain some kind of
homeless.

So I think before the different parts of the community could
collaborate, approximate or even reunite, the homeless need a new home
and I do not see another place now - especially no better one - as the ASF.

Looking at the discussion of the last days I see many valid arguments on
both sides and a level of approximation I would not have considered
possible before. So please let that evolve and don't cancel it before it
has begun. I would find it sad to see only parts of the experience
represented on the committers list ( not my little bit ;-) ) beeing lost
for OOo.

My understanding of the Apache Incubator is that it is a place to see in
reality if all the might-be and if is valid or not (might be wrong
with it?).

So I would be curious to see the things coming.

Thank you for your time
Christoph




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Scott Wilson
+1 (non-binding)

/-/-/-/-/-/
Scott Wilson

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Malte Timmermann

+1  (non-binding)

Malte.

On 10.06.2011 19:05, Sam Ruby wrote:

  [X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

- Sam Ruby

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Malte Timmermann

+1  (non-binding)

Malte.

On 10.06.2011 19:05, Sam Ruby wrote:

  [X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

- Sam Ruby

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Eric Charles

[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Eric

On 10/06/11 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:

*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.

At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here
is a link to the document in the wiki:

http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to
scan and review the archives for this month:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser


Please cast your votes:

[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

This vote will close 72 hours from now.

- Sam Ruby

= OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
== Abstract ==
!OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications:
a word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet,
presentation graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database.
!OpenOffice.org is released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh
operation systems, with more
[[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
mature [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
!OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

== Proposal ==
Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
!OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
namely:

To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality
and data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
forums, document template repositories, etc. The project will also work
to further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
document automation scenarios.

== Background ==
!OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun
Microsystems in June 2000. !OpenOffice.org was originally developed
under the name of StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which
was acquired by Sun Microsystems in 1999. Sun released this as open
source in 2000. !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office
available. Its most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
million downloads]] in its first year. The
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral
and scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the
next-stage architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate
applications or as embedded components in other applications. Numerous
other features are also present including XML-based file formats based
on the vendor-neutral !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and
other resources.

== Rationale ==
!OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual
open development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the
!OpenOffice.org development community, previously fragmented, would
re-unite under ASF to ensure a stable and long term future for
OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable corporate, non-profit, and volunteer
stakeholders to contribute code in a collaborative fashion.

Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org
contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.

Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS
Open Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs
and Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and
related solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose
the application or solution that best meets their requirements.

The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference
implementation of the Open Document Format standard.

= Current Status =
== Meritocracy ==
We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache. We are
particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal,
that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in this
meritocracy and as they demonstrate their sustained commitment and
merit, to take on additional community responsibilities.

The initial developers are very familiar with open source development,
both at Apache and 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread donald_harbison
+1 (non-binding)

- Don Harbison

Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote on 06/10/2011 12:02:44 PM:

 
 Please cast your votes:
 
 [ X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
 
 This vote will close 72 hours from now.
 
 - Sam Ruby


Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Richard Hirsch
+1 (binding)

Dick

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:06 PM,  donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
 +1 (non-binding)

 - Don Harbison

 Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote on 06/10/2011 12:02:44 PM:


 Please cast your votes:

 [ X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread IngridvdM

[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)

I would like to humbly beg you people from Apache for giving a chance to 
those who are willing to join you. I am deeply sorry that we are 
bringing a big political dispute with us. My hope is that the community 
that was so heavily divided last year will be able to reunite on your 
neutral ground.


Thanks!
Ingrid von der Mehden

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Henri Yandell
+1 (non-binding).

I'm not concerned by any the ASF don't do XYZ - there's very little
centralization and the pressure will mostly be on the Incubator and
then later members@ to ensure 'the Apache way' isn't closeted to
programmers.

It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no chance of
being coded and that went very quickly, showing how well maximum
openness can walk the path between corporate, startup and hobby needs.

I was initially concerned by the Libre side of things. Were Oracle
looking to suckerpunch Apache? Were we going to smile and take it for
a random set of bytes (code over community; which we know is bad)? As
I dig more I am less concerned by this. It's sad that Libre and Open
would be separate, but that's a sadness that pervades our communities.
Free and Open are unable to find a compromise (cf: Linuxes  BSDs) and
this is just more of the same. We talk about 'the community' in
reference to Libre, but dual-licensing models have two communities -
you can't spin one off and forget the other.

So +1 to OpenOffice@Apache. It creates a contribution model to
LibreOffice, without scaring away the big potential contributors with
undesirable licensing.

Hen

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a
 link to the document in the wiki:

 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan
 and review the archives for this month:

 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby

 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is
 released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with
 more [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
 mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
 namely:

 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and
  data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
 forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to
 further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
 document automation scenarios.

 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems
 in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.
  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its
 most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
 million downloads]] in its first year.  The
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
 recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.

 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org
 development community, previously fragmented, would 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Pedro Giffuni

[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)

I like the Apache license and I think having a really free alternative
is good for everyone, as much as clang vs gcc and linux vs FreeBSD.

Apache is also a good fit for OO technologically and I think the
incubation process will end up benefiting libreoffice by either code
adoption and by providing further motivation to keep being relevant.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
+1 - binding

Regards,
Alan

On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
 
 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, 
 I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache 
 Incubator project.
 
 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a 
 link to the document in the wiki:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207
 
 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan 
 and review the archives for this month:
 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
 
 Please cast your votes:
 
 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
 
 This vote will close 72 hours from now.
 
 - Sam Ruby
 
 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a 
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation 
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is released 
 on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with more 
 [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a mature  
 [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]]. !OpenOffice.org is 
 localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.
 
 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the 
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle, namely:
 
 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that  will 
 run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and  data 
 through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.
 
 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user facing 
 product with many existing individual and corporate users, this project will 
 also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user forums, document 
 template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to further enable 
 !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in document automation 
 scenarios.
 
 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems in 
 June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of 
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun 
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.  
 !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its most 
 recent major version, the 3.x series saw over 
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
  million downloads]] in its first year.  The 
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
  recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.
 
 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and 
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage 
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or 
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are 
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral 
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.
 
 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the 
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open 
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org 
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to 
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable 
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a 
 collaborative fashion.
 
 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org contribution, 
 providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.
 
 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS Open 
 Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and 
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related 
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the application 
 or solution that best meets their requirements.
 
 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference implementation 
 of the Open Document Format standard.
 
 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We are 
 particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal, that 
 there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in this meritocracy and 
 as they demonstrate their sustained commitment and merit, 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Nick Burch

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:

Please cast your votes:


I'm +1

If accepted, I'll try to help out with the podling, but alas I've not got 
time at the moment to take on a full mentorship role of it.


Nick

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Danese Cooper
Please cast your votes:

[ +1 ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

Danese


Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Bill Stoddard

[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

On 6/10/11 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:

*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be 
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept 
OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project.


At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  
Here is a link to the document in the wiki:


http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to 
scan and review the archives for this month:


http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser 



Please cast your votes:

[  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

This vote will close 72 hours from now.

- Sam Ruby

= OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
== Abstract ==
!OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity 
applications: a word processor (and its web-authoring component), 
spreadsheet, presentation graphics, drawing, equation editor, and 
database. !OpenOffice.org is released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and 
Macintosh operation systems, with more 
[[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a 
mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]]. 
!OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.


== Proposal ==
Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the 
!OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle, 
namely:


To create, as a community, the leading international office suite 
that  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all 
functionality and  data through open-component based APIs and an 
XML-based file format.


In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user 
facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this 
project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, 
user forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will 
also work to further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a 
programmable module in document automation scenarios.


== Background ==
!OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun 
Microsystems in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed 
under the name of StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which 
was acquired by Sun Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open 
source in 2000.  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to 
MS-Office available.  Its most recent major version, the 3.x series 
saw over 
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100 
million downloads]] in its first year.  The 
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most 
recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.


The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral 
and scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the 
next-stage architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as 
separate applications or as embedded components in other applications. 
Numerous other features are also present including XML-based file 
formats based on the vendor-neutral !OpenDocument Format (ODF) 
standard from OASIS and other resources.


== Rationale ==
!OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following 
the contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its 
usual open development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the 
!OpenOffice.org development community, previously fragmented, would 
re-unite under ASF to ensure a stable and long term future for 
OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable corporate, non-profit, and volunteer 
stakeholders to contribute code in a collaborative fashion.


Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org 
contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing 
!OpenOffice.org.


Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the 
OASIS Open Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of 
developers, ISVs and Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of 
!OpenOffice.org and related solutions will own their document data, 
and be free to choose the application or solution that best meets 
their requirements.


The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference 
implementation of the Open Document Format standard.


= Current Status =
== Meritocracy ==
We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We 
are particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this 
proposal, that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in 
this meritocracy and as they demonstrate their sustained commitment 
and merit, to take on additional community responsibilities.


The initial 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 6/10/2011 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
 
 Please cast your votes:
 
 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

+1 [binding]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Alexei Fedotov
+1 (non-binding)
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095




On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:20 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
 On 6/10/2011 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

 +1 [binding]

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Davanum Srinivas
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:20 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
 On 6/10/2011 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

 +1 [binding]

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Dave Fisher

[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

Non-binding.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Simon Phipps
+1  (non-binding)

S.


Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Danese Cooper
Sorry, should have said +1 [binding]

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Please cast your votes:

 [ +1 ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

 Danese



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
+1
non-binding

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a
 link to the document in the wiki:

 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan
 and review the archives for this month:

 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby

 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is
 released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with
 more [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
 mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
 namely:

 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and
  data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
 forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to
 further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
 document automation scenarios.

 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems
 in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.
  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its
 most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
 million downloads]] in its first year.  The
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
 recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.

 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a
 collaborative fashion.

 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org contribution,
 providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.

 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS Open
 Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the
 application or solution that best meets their requirements.

 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference implementation
 of the Open Document Format standard.

 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We are
 particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal,
 that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in this
 meritocracy and as they demonstrate their sustained commitment and merit, to
 take on additional community responsibilities.

 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Phillip Rhodes
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:


 Please cast your votes:

 [X ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.


(non-binding)


Phil


Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
-1, as I feel this is not in the best interests of the world but rather of a
few powers.

(Officially I'm on the incubator PMC I believe but I have not been active ..
so lets chalk this up for non-binding.)

Sanjiva.

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:

 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is
 a link to the document in the wiki:

 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan
 and review the archives for this month:


 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby

 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is
 released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with
 more [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
 mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
 namely:

 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and
  data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
 forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to
 further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
 document automation scenarios.

 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems
 in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.
  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its
 most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over [[
 http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100million
  downloads]] in its first year.  The [[
 http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|mostrecent
  estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.

 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a
 collaborative fashion.

 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org
 contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.

 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS
 Open Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the
 application or solution that best meets their requirements.

 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference implementation
 of the Open Document Format standard.

 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We are
 particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Sam Ruby
 [X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

- Sam Ruby

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Richard S. Hall

+1

- richard

On 6/10/11 12:02, Sam Ruby wrote:

*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be 
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept 
OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project.


At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  
Here is a link to the document in the wiki:


http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to 
scan and review the archives for this month:


http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser 



Please cast your votes:

[  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

This vote will close 72 hours from now.

- Sam Ruby

= OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
== Abstract ==
!OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity 
applications: a word processor (and its web-authoring component), 
spreadsheet, presentation graphics, drawing, equation editor, and 
database. !OpenOffice.org is released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and 
Macintosh operation systems, with more 
[[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a 
mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]]. 
!OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.


== Proposal ==
Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the 
!OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle, 
namely:


To create, as a community, the leading international office suite 
that  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all 
functionality and  data through open-component based APIs and an 
XML-based file format.


In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user 
facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this 
project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, 
user forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will 
also work to further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a 
programmable module in document automation scenarios.


== Background ==
!OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun 
Microsystems in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed 
under the name of StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which 
was acquired by Sun Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open 
source in 2000.  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to 
MS-Office available.  Its most recent major version, the 3.x series 
saw over 
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100 
million downloads]] in its first year.  The 
[[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most 
recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.


The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral 
and scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the 
next-stage architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as 
separate applications or as embedded components in other applications. 
Numerous other features are also present including XML-based file 
formats based on the vendor-neutral !OpenDocument Format (ODF) 
standard from OASIS and other resources.


== Rationale ==
!OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following 
the contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its 
usual open development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the 
!OpenOffice.org development community, previously fragmented, would 
re-unite under ASF to ensure a stable and long term future for 
OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable corporate, non-profit, and volunteer 
stakeholders to contribute code in a collaborative fashion.


Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org 
contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing 
!OpenOffice.org.


Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the 
OASIS Open Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of 
developers, ISVs and Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of 
!OpenOffice.org and related solutions will own their document data, 
and be free to choose the application or solution that best meets 
their requirements.


The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference 
implementation of the Open Document Format standard.


= Current Status =
== Meritocracy ==
We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We 
are particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this 
proposal, that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in 
this meritocracy and as they demonstrate their sustained commitment 
and merit, to take on additional community responsibilities.


The initial developers are very familiar 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Karl Pauls
+1 (binding)

regards,

Karl

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
 +1

 - richard

 On 6/10/11 12:02, Sam Ruby wrote:

 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is
 a link to the document in the wiki:

 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to
 scan and review the archives for this month:


 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby

 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is
 released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with
 more [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
 mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
 namely:

 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and
  data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
 forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to
 further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
 document automation scenarios.

 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems
 in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.
  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its
 most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
 million downloads]] in its first year.  The
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
 recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.

 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a
 collaborative fashion.

 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org
 contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.

 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS
 Open Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the
 application or solution that best meets their requirements.

 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference
 implementation of the Open Document Format standard.

 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We are
 particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal,
 that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in this
 meritocracy and as they demonstrate their sustained 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Roman H. Gelbort
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

-- 
---
Prof. Román H. Gelbort
No busquemos aplicaciones que reemplacen aplicaciones, 
sino aplicaciones que resuelvan problemas específicos...

http://www.piensalibre.com.ar
---


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:02:44PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

+1 (binding)

Marvin Humphrey


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Andrew Rist

+1 (non-binding)


Please cast your votes:

[  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



RE: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Sander van der Waal
 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation


+1 (non-binding)

Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
+1
-louis

On 2011-06-10 13:41 , Sander van der Waal wrote:
 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 
 +1 (non-binding)
 
 Sander
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Simos Xenitellis
 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation


-1 (non-binding)

This proposal is for the hosting of all OpenOffice.org services by the ASF,
and mandates for items such as marketing, documentation and localisation
which are not core competencies of the ASF. Moreover, the ASF has no
other project like OOo
that focuses on end-users. Furthermore, existing ASF developers have
little or no prior exposure to the OOo codebase due to the licensing
issue.

It would make sense for the ASF to focus on an ODF reference
implementation instead of undertaking the whole of OpenOffice.org, as
the FSF recommends,
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html

I believe that the ASF will be overwhelmed by the sheer amount of
diverse effort that is required, if this proposal passes.
Any development effort should join LibreOffice and the TDF (The
Document Foundation) which gained already the attention of the
community.

Simos

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



RE: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Noel J. Bergman
+1

--- Noel


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Leif Hedstrom
+1 (binding)

Cheers!

-- Leif 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 binding, of course...

On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

 [+1] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Roman H. Gelbort
El 10/06/11 14:17, Roman H. Gelbort escribió:
 +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

and binding

-- 
---
Prof. Román H. Gelbort
No busquemos aplicaciones que reemplacen aplicaciones, 
sino aplicaciones que resuelvan problemas específicos...

http://www.piensalibre.com.ar
---


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Andy Brown


+1 (non-binding)

Andy Brown

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Scott Deboy
+1 (binding)

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Roman H. Gelbort ro...@piensalibre.com.ar
 wrote:

 El 10/06/11 14:17, Roman H. Gelbort escribió:
  +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 
 and binding

 --

 ---
 Prof. Román H. Gelbort
 No busquemos aplicaciones que reemplacen aplicaciones,
 sino aplicaciones que resuelvan problemas específicos...

 http://www.piensalibre.com.ar

 ---


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Mike Edwards


+1

On 10/06/2011 17:02, Sam Ruby wrote:

*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, I 
would like to
initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project.

At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is a 
link to the document in
the wiki:

http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan and 
review the archives
for this month:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

Please cast your votes:

[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

This vote will close 72 hours from now.

- Sam Ruby


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Marcel Offermans
+1 (binding)


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Yegor Kozlov
+1

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a
 link to the document in the wiki:

 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan
 and review the archives for this month:

 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby

 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is
 released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with
 more [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
 mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
 namely:

 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and
  data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
 forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to
 further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
 document automation scenarios.

 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems
 in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.
  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its
 most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
 million downloads]] in its first year.  The
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
 recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.

 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a
 collaborative fashion.

 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org contribution,
 providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.

 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS Open
 Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the
 application or solution that best meets their requirements.

 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference implementation
 of the Open Document Format standard.

 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We are
 particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal,
 that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in this
 meritocracy and as they demonstrate their sustained commitment and merit, to
 take on additional community responsibilities.

 The initial 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Donald Whytock
+1 (non-binding)

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Yegor Kozlov yegor.koz...@dinom.ru wrote:
 +1

 On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a
 link to the document in the wiki:

 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan
 and review the archives for this month:

 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby

 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is
 released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with
 more [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
 mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
 namely:

 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and
  data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
 forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to
 further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
 document automation scenarios.

 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems
 in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.
  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its
 most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
 million downloads]] in its first year.  The
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
 recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.

 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a
 collaborative fashion.

 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org contribution,
 providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.

 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS Open
 Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the
 application or solution that best meets their requirements.

 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference implementation
 of the Open Document Format standard.

 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We are
 particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal,
 that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in this
 meritocracy and as they demonstrate their 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Guillaume Nodet
-0 (binding)

I concur with Sanjiva and it seems to be just a political move to me.

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 19:04, Sanjiva Weerawarana
sanj...@opensource.lk wrote:
 -1, as I feel this is not in the best interests of the world but rather of a
 few powers.

 (Officially I'm on the incubator PMC I believe but I have not been active ..
 so lets chalk this up for non-binding.)

 Sanjiva.

 On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:

 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is
 a link to the document in the wiki:

 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan
 and review the archives for this month:


 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby

 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is
 released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with
 more [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
 mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
 namely:

 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and
  data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
 forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to
 further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
 document automation scenarios.

 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems
 in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.
  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its
 most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over [[
 http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100million
  downloads]] in its first year.  The [[
 http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|mostrecent
  estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.

 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a
 collaborative fashion.

 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org
 contribution, providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.

 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS
 Open Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the
 application or solution that best meets their requirements.

 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference implementation
 of the Open Document Format standard.

 = 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Greg Stein
On Jun 10, 2011 9:03 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
...
 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

+1 (binding)


Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Luciano Resende
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]

 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
 down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
 Apache Incubator project.

 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a
 link to the document in the wiki:

 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan
 and review the archives for this month:

 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

 Please cast your votes:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

 This vote will close 72 hours from now.

 - Sam Ruby

 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is
 released on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with
 more [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a
 mature  [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]].
 !OpenOffice.org is localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.

 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle,
 namely:

 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that
  will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and
  data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user
 facing product with many existing individual and corporate users, this
 project will also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user
 forums, document template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to
 further enable !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in
 document automation scenarios.

 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems
 in June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.
  !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its
 most recent major version, the 3.x series saw over
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
 million downloads]] in its first year.  The
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
 recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.

 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.

 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a
 collaborative fashion.

 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org contribution,
 providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.

 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS Open
 Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the
 application or solution that best meets their requirements.

 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference implementation
 of the Open Document Format standard.

 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We are
 particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal,
 that there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in this
 meritocracy and as they demonstrate their sustained commitment and merit, to
 take on additional community responsibilities.

 The initial 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Craig L Russell

+1

There are many reasons that this project might fail at Apache. These  
reasons have been brought up and discussed enough that I feel  
comfortable giving the project the chance to prove that it can be  
successful.


Craig

On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this  
[VOTE]


As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be  
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept  
OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project.


At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.   
Here is a link to the document in the wiki:


http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207

As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people  
to scan and review the archives for this month:


http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser

Please cast your votes:

[  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation



Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
Chair, OpenJPA PMC
c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo










-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:

 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation

+1 (Non-binding)


-- 
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of
everyone.

John Maynard Keynes (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Keynes)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Larry Gusaas

On 2011/06/10 10:02 AM  Sam Ruby wrote:

[  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation 


+1 (Non-binding)


--
_
Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: http://larry-gusaas.com
An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs. - 
Edgard Varese



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Mladen Turk

[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

On 06/10/2011 06:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:

*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]


Please cast your votes:

[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation



Regards
--
^TM

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Keith Curtis
-1

My list of 44 reasons is here:
http://keithcu.com/wordpress/?p=2567

To boil it down to one: this plan as announced had several big flaws, and
they still exist.

Kind regards,

-Keith

P.S. I don't see many from LibreOffice voting against this proposal, so I
joined again to vote on their behalf.

P.P.S. Hopefully more register their votes on this important matter like
good netizens. The cheapest thing now is to vote no so we can make a
better plan.


Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Stefan Seelmann
-0 (binding)

My concerns:
- It wasn't the community that wanted to join Apache but commercial
entities decided and now the community is forced to join or stay away
- The OOo code base, eco system, and user base is huge and should be
managed by its own foundation
- A copy-left license fits well for an FOSS office suite

My hopes:
- Apache OOo becomes a reference implementation of ODF and provides
libraries (like POI) which can be consumed
- Apache is able and willing to allow 3rd parties the use of the OOo brand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Kazunari Hirano
+1 (Non-binding)

Thanks,
Kazunari Hirano

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Ross Gardler
+1 (binding)

Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)

On 10 Jun 2011, at 17:02, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:

 *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
 
 As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, 
 I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache 
 Incubator project.
 
 At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a 
 link to the document in the wiki:
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal?action=recallrev=207
 
 As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan 
 and review the archives for this month:
 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
 
 Please cast your votes:
 
 [  ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 [  ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
 [  ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
 
 This vote will close 72 hours from now.
 
 - Sam Ruby
 
 = OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
 == Abstract ==
 !OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity applications: a 
 word processor (and its web-authoring component), spreadsheet, presentation 
 graphics, drawing, equation editor, and database. !OpenOffice.org is released 
 on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Macintosh operation systems, with more 
 [[http://porting.openoffice.org/|communities]] joining, including a mature  
 [[http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/|FreeBSD port]]. !OpenOffice.org is 
 localized, supporting over 110 languages worldwide.
 
 == Proposal ==
 Apache !OpenOffice.org will continue the mission pursued by the 
 !OpenOffice.org project while under the sponsorship of Sun and Oracle, namely:
 
 To create, as a community, the leading international office suite that  will 
 run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and  data 
 through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.
 
 In addition to to building the !OpenOffice.org product, as an end-user facing 
 product with many existing individual and corporate users, this project will 
 also be active in supporting end-users via tutorials, user forums, document 
 template repositories, etc.  The project will also work to further enable 
 !OpenOffice.org to be used as a programmable module in document automation 
 scenarios.
 
 == Background ==
 !OpenOffice.org was launched as an open source project by Sun Microsystems in 
 June 2000.  !OpenOffice.org was originally developed under the name of 
 StarOffice by Star Division, a German company, which was acquired by Sun 
 Microsystems in 1999.  Sun released this as open source in 2000.  
 !OpenOffice.org is the leading alternative to MS-Office available.  Its most 
 recent major version, the 3.x series saw over 
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|100
  million downloads]] in its first year.  The 
 [[http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html|most
  recent estimates]] suggest a market share on the order of 8-15%.
 
 The !OpenOffice source is written in C++ and delivers language-neutral and 
 scriptable functionality. This source technology introduces the next-stage 
 architecture, allowing use of the suite elements as separate applications or 
 as embedded components in other applications. Numerous other features are 
 also present including XML-based file formats based on the vendor-neutral 
 !OpenDocument Format (ODF) standard from OASIS and other resources.
 
 == Rationale ==
 !OpenOffice.org core development would continue at Apache following the 
 contribution by Oracle, in accordance with Apache bylaws and its usual open 
 development processes. Both Oracle and ASF agree that the !OpenOffice.org 
 development community, previously fragmented, would re-unite under ASF to 
 ensure a stable and long term future for OpenOffice.org. ASF would enable 
 corporate, non-profit, and volunteer stakeholders to contribute code in a 
 collaborative fashion.
 
 Supporting tooling projects will accompany the !OpenOffice.org contribution, 
 providing APIs for extending and customizing !OpenOffice.org.
 
 Both !OpenOffice.org and the related tooling projects support the OASIS Open 
 Document Format, and will attract an ecosystem of developers, ISVs and 
 Systems Integrators. ODF ensures the users of !OpenOffice.org and related 
 solutions will own their document data, and be free to choose the application 
 or solution that best meets their requirements.
 
 The !OpenOffice.org implementation will serve as a reference implementation 
 of the Open Document Format standard.
 
 = Current Status =
 == Meritocracy ==
 We understand the intention and value of meritocracy at Apache.  We are 
 particularly gratified to learn, during the discussion on this proposal, that 
 there is a strong role for non-coders to participate in this meritocracy and 
 

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread eric b

Hi,

[ +1 ] (non binding) Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation


Thanks !
Eric Bachard

--
qɔᴉɹə
Education Project:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news







Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Phil Steitz
-1

I do not think that accepting this podling is in the best interest
of the ASF.   Absent explicit criteria / principles governing what
we accept into the Incubator, I have to apply informal judgment here
and I am voting -1 for the following reasons:

0) I think the ASF has a responsibility to consider the broader
community impacts of our actions.  Arguments have been presented on
both sides of this issue here and elsewhere.  My personal conclusion
is that this is not a *good thing* for the ASF to do.

1) The Incubator exists to provide a means for communities to join
the ASF.   I am not comfortable that this proposal is consistent
with that mission.  I know this proposal is not unique in
representing a commercial collaboration and we have never drawn any
lines defining what is acceptable / not acceptable in commercial
exploitation of the ASF brand and infrastructure.  Absent that, I
have to apply judgment here and my personal opinion is that this
proposal crosses the line.

I respect and acknowledge the efforts of the ASF and other
volunteers working to build a community around this proposal and
should this VOTE pass, I will join the other ASF members in
welcoming the new volunteers to the ASF.

Please respect the VOTE subject line above and refrain from
responding to this post in the same thread.  Please also review the
links Sam posted before repeating arguments already presented. 

Phil

 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Comment: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Andy Brown

Keith Curtis wrote:

-1

My list of 44 reasons is here:
http://keithcu.com/wordpress/?p=2567

To boil it down to one: this plan as announced had several big flaws, and
they still exist.

Kind regards,

-Keith

P.S. I don't see many from LibreOffice voting against this proposal, so I
joined again to vote on their behalf.

P.P.S. Hopefully more register their votes on this important matter like
good netizens. The cheapest thing now is to vote no so we can make a
better plan.



According to your blog, linked above, your quite willing for those that 
may not support LibreOffice to just go home?  And lose the talent to 
that can help this grow even bigger.


Andy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread florent andré

[ X ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation


non-binding

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-10 Thread Mark Struberg

I think we should give it a try.

+1 (binding)

LieGrue,
strub

PS: I fear there is a misunderstanding regarding binding vs non-binding votes. 
Binding votes can only be cast by a IncubatorPMC member [1]. But of course, 
also non-binding +1 are welcome ;)

[1] http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc

--- On Fri, 6/10/11, Roman H. Gelbort ro...@piensalibre.com.ar wrote:

 From: Roman H. Gelbort ro...@piensalibre.com.ar
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Date: Friday, June 10, 2011, 6:13 PM
 El 10/06/11 14:17, Roman H. Gelbort
 escribió:
  +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
 
 and binding
 
 -- 
 ---
 Prof. Román H. Gelbort
 No busquemos aplicaciones que reemplacen aplicaciones, 
 sino aplicaciones que resuelvan problemas específicos...
 
 http://www.piensalibre.com.ar
 ---
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



  1   2   >