[RESULT] Tapestry TLP
Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move Tapestry to an Apache top level project. Pending the approval of the Jakarta PMC, we'll be submitting the request to the Apache board. === Establish the Apache Tapestry Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to the implementation of the Tapestry Web Application Framework, for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the Tapestry PMC, be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Tapestry PMC be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to creation and maintenance of open-source software and documentation related to the Tapestry Web Application Framework based on software licensed to the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Tapestry be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Tapestry PMC, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Tapestry PMC; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Tapestry PMC: * Howard M. Lewis Ship ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Geoffrey Longman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Kent Tong (freemant2000 at yahoo dot com) * David Solis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Jesse Kuhnert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Paul Ferraro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Richard Lewis-Shell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Mind Bridge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Tsvetelin Saykov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Howard Lewis Ship be appointed to the office of Vice President, Tapestry, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Tapestry PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Tapestry Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Tapestry PMC be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Jakarta PMC Tapestry subproject; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the Jakarta Tapestry sub-project and encumbered upon the Apache Jakarta PMC are hereafter discharged. === Binding votes: Howard M. Lewis Ship: +1 Jesse Kuhnert: +1 Paul Ferraro: +1 Geoff Longman: +1 Richard Lewis-Shell: +1 David Solis: +1 Kent Tong: +1 Non-binding votes: Kevin Menard: +1 Danny Angus: +1 Massimo Lusetti: +1 Filip S. Adamsen: +1 Andreas Andreou: +1 -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT] Tapestry TLP
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move Tapestry to an Apache top level project. Pending the approval of the Jakarta PMC, we'll be submitting the request to the Apache board. is another VOTE needed for approval or can we just go with the VOTE held on the tapestry thread? - robert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [RESULT] Tapestry TLP
On 2/7/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move Tapestry to an Apache top level project. Pending the approval of the Jakarta PMC, we'll be submitting the request to the Apache board. is another VOTE needed for approval or can we just go with the VOTE held on the tapestry thread? let's vote on it! +1's from me all around. :) - robert -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD6Ogd1TNOdbExPeIRAvPmAJ9ZLCx/+BOAQWzKCyWTU1QmVQreNgCg3oDX 6md02peVDloWkBYLqiMkATY= =d4ev -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT] Tapestry TLP
Nobody is very sure of the protocol here. I suspect that if someone felt strongly enough, they could start a vote to prevent the Tapestry team from submitting the request to the Apache board. I'm -1 on that! On 2/7/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move Tapestry to an Apache top level project. Pending the approval of the Jakarta PMC, we'll be submitting the request to the Apache board. is another VOTE needed for approval or can we just go with the VOTE held on the tapestry thread? - robert -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD6Ogd1TNOdbExPeIRAvPmAJ9ZLCx/+BOAQWzKCyWTU1QmVQreNgCg3oDX 6md02peVDloWkBYLqiMkATY= =d4ev -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT] Tapestry TLP
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move Tapestry to an Apache top level project. Pending the approval of the Jakarta PMC, we'll be submitting the request to the Apache board. is another VOTE needed for approval or can we just go with the VOTE held on the tapestry thread? There were at least 3 +1's from PMC members on the Tapestry list, so this thread (and the similar one on pmc@) are really about whether anyone has a -1. If nothing comes up in 72 hours, Howard can then mail the board with the request (ccing the pmc). As Howard just said, we've not got anything set in stone, and given that even we don't do the TLP bit that often, I figure we can just continue to bumble through each time :) Mostly it seems important that the subproject have written a proposal, the PMC members involved are +1 and the community at large has had a chance to -1. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add Xythos Software to Specialized Solution Provider
I would like to submit the following to be added as a Specialized Solution Provider to your http://jakarta.apache.org/site/vendors.html page. Company: Xythos Software Description: Xythos is a leading developer of easy-to-use solutions for managing and sharing content of any type using open standards-based technology, including Tomcat. To aid developers in the customization of its content management platform, Xythos offers customization services as well as its own developer.xythos.com web site. Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Melissa Kern User and Developer Experience Manager Xythos Software
[site] Kill the vendor support page
As per the previous email, I'd like to raise the question of killing the vendor support page. With Tomcat moving to TLP, there's even less Jakarta support here than before. Mainly it's Ant, Struts, Log4j, Tomcat and HTTP Server. Alternatively, we could attempt to make it a Java support page for Apache products, or even talk to someone - probably the board, maybe prc - about having an Apache version of this. However, I think that doing it ourselves is probably outside our scope and I suspect there won't be a huge amount of interest Apache-wide to having such a database of vendors. Any thoughts? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [site] Kill the vendor support page
+1 to kill it. On 2/7/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As per the previous email, I'd like to raise the question of killing the vendor support page. With Tomcat moving to TLP, there's even less Jakarta support here than before. Mainly it's Ant, Struts, Log4j, Tomcat and HTTP Server. Alternatively, we could attempt to make it a Java support page for Apache products, or even talk to someone - probably the board, maybe prc - about having an Apache version of this. However, I think that doing it ourselves is probably outside our scope and I suspect there won't be a huge amount of interest Apache-wide to having such a database of vendors. Any thoughts? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [site] Kill the vendor support page
Well, there's not many people on it. I'd solicit their opinion. Do they actually get business from this page? If not, then definitely kill it. If such people do get business from this page, I'm less certain. Specifically, if the vendors are Jakarta committers, and they find the pages useful, we should consider keeping it. People donate lots of time to Jakarta and open source. It seems a good cause to help them bring in more consulting work, and low harm to Jakarta for sponsoring a page on such a very non-commercial site. WILL - Original Message - From: Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List general@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 6:37 PM Subject: Re: [site] Kill the vendor support page +1 to kill it. On 2/7/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As per the previous email, I'd like to raise the question of killing the vendor support page. With Tomcat moving to TLP, there's even less Jakarta support here than before. Mainly it's Ant, Struts, Log4j, Tomcat and HTTP Server. Alternatively, we could attempt to make it a Java support page for Apache products, or even talk to someone - probably the board, maybe prc - about having an Apache version of this. However, I think that doing it ourselves is probably outside our scope and I suspect there won't be a huge amount of interest Apache-wide to having such a database of vendors. Any thoughts? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
