Re: Eyebrowse problem?

2003-03-24 Thread Andrew C. Oliver


The 'access' clause is bullshit as well...all you have to do is ask and show
that you are willing to help out...
 

Great!  Howard, go to "infrastructure" and ask for bugzilla admin access 
as well as access to nagoya.  Ask for
mail admin access while your at it (because I think you have to have it 
to fix the eyebrowse issue, though I didn't
understand it the last 3-4 times i've read messages on the issue). 

-Andy

-jon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Eyebrowse problem?

2003-03-24 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 2003/3/24 10:11 AM, "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> With all due respect Jon, he doesn't have sufficient access to
> volunteer.  You need a new phrase
> "thanks for volunteering for the campaign" ;-)
> 
> Not as catchy, I admit.
> 
> -Andy

The 'access' clause is bullshit as well...all you have to do is ask and show
that you are willing to help out...

-jon


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Eyebrowse problem?

2003-03-24 Thread Danny Angus
Jon,

you wrote:

> Luckily, eyebrowse is also open source. =)
> 
> Thanks for volunteering!


I guess you are being, at least in part, facetious. If not I think that you've 
misunderstood my point.
Eyebrowse is OK, it is only suffering from issues regarding its administration. 
It is the ability of infrastructure to effectively track, assign and resolve issues 
that was provoking debate. 
I doubt that volunteering another opinion would help solve that.

d.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Eyebrowse problem?

2003-03-24 Thread Andrew C. Oliver


My response to postings like this is:

   Thanks for volunteering! =)

-jon

 

With all due respect Jon, he doesn't have sufficient access to 
volunteer.  You need a new phrase
"thanks for volunteering for the campaign" ;-)

Not as catchy, I admit. 

-Andy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Eyebrowse problem?

2003-03-24 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 2003/3/24 6:42 AM, "Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> FYI theres been a lot of talk recently about eybrowse, it has been not working
> for several lists, not just Tapestry. Theres also been some discussion about
> tracking infrastructure issues. Needless to say there are two points of view
> as usual. :-\
> 
> d.

Luckily, eyebrowse is also open source. =)

Thanks for volunteering!

-jon

-- 
StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment
314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco
http://studioz.tv/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Eyebrowse problem?

2003-03-24 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 2003/3/23 4:24 PM, "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Many of my users have complained that Tapestry is no longer being archived.
> I did a little poke around eyebrowse, and not only is Tapestry not archived,
> none of the lists seems to have been updated since late february.
> 
> Once again, its all chaos at Jakarta.  I don't understand why the folks with
> the capabilities and responsibilities to handle infrastructure issues and
> requests don't take five minutes to set up a BugZilla category for these
> things.  Instead, it is left to endless e-mails, no tracking, nothing gets
> done ...

My response to postings like this is:

Thanks for volunteering! =)

-jon

-- 
StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment
314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco
http://studioz.tv/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Eyebrowse problem?

2003-03-24 Thread Danny Angus
FYI theres been a lot of talk recently about eybrowse, it has been not working for 
several lists, not just Tapestry. Theres also been some discussion about tracking 
infrastructure issues. Needless to say there are two points of view as usual. :-\

d.


> Subject: RE: Eyebrowse problem?

> I'll make that case at infrastructure.

> > >Many of my users have complained that Tapestry is no longer being 
> > >archived. I did a little poke around eyebrowse, and not only is 
> > >Tapestry not archived, none of the lists seems to have been updated 
> > >since late february.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Eyebrowse problem?

2003-03-24 Thread Howard M. Lewis Ship
Point taken.  I'll pursue this there.  I don't expect things to happen at
the snap of my fingers, I just want feedback that issues are being resolved.
I'll make that case at infrastructure.

--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry



> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 7:47 PM
> To: Jakarta General List
> Subject: Re: Eyebrowse problem?
> 
> 
> Hi Howard,
> 
> Lets get a few things straight.  This isn't a "Jakarta" 
> thing.  Apache 
> expands beyond Jakarta.  In fact this is
> not the proper place for this request.  The proper place is 
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
> 
> Please note that I would be happy to help with this, however I do not 
> have the necessary karma or probably even the
> expertise. 
> 
> Please take note of the tone of your email.  I understand your 
> frustration, this is a volunteer organization, and while the 
> volunteer 
> system
> works well for software, it is not always great for infrastructure. 
> 
> Regardless, this is where we are.  You're asking for someone 
> to do you a 
> "favor" and fix eyebrowse.  Do you feel your tone does
> it in a way that will motivate them to do so?
> 
> Let us now address the bugzilla issue.  I've noted my preference for 
> this as well, however, I do not currently have the bandwidth 
> necessary to drive the discussion towards that.  You, 
> however, are empowered to do 
> so!  Join the infrastructure list and start the discussion.  
> I would suggest that in order to be effective, you describe 
> the problem 
> (calmly), describe the solution, the best alternative and why 
> you feel 
> bugzilla would
> be appropriate.  Inevitably someone will argue against it or 
> just "for" 
> the status quo.  Through persistance, offering to help manage 
> it, etc, your issue may be addressed.
> 
> Complaining about jakarta on this mail list will probably just peeve 
> people off and serve you nothing, although you're certainly 
> welcome to 
> try it.
> Is this the most judicious use of your (and others') time?
> 
> A man once said "You decide".
> 
> -Andy
> 
> 
> 
> Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
> 
> >Many of my users have complained that Tapestry is no longer being 
> >archived. I did a little poke around eyebrowse, and not only is 
> >Tapestry not archived, none of the lists seems to have been updated 
> >since late february.
> >
> >Once again, its all chaos at Jakarta.  I don't understand 
> why the folks 
> >with the capabilities and responsibilities to handle infrastructure 
> >issues and requests don't take five minutes to set up a BugZilla 
> >category for these things.  Instead, it is left to endless 
> e-mails, no 
> >tracking, nothing gets done ...
> >
> >--
> >Howard M. Lewis Ship
> >Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components 
> >http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 6:25 PM
> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Cc: Magesh Umasankar
> >>Subject: Re: Eyebrowse problem?
> >>
> >>
> >>On 20/3/03 21:03 "Magesh Umasankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>All I get when trying to look up any archived
> >>>message thread is $msgHeaders as the meat of it.
> >>>
> >>>What is going on?
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>We're aware of it... Will be fixed hopefully soon...
> >>
> >>Pier
> >>
> >>
> >>
> -
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Eyebrowse problem?

2003-03-23 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Hi Howard,

Lets get a few things straight.  This isn't a "Jakarta" thing.  Apache 
expands beyond Jakarta.  In fact this is
not the proper place for this request.  The proper place is 
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]".

Please note that I would be happy to help with this, however I do not 
have the necessary karma or probably even the
expertise. 

Please take note of the tone of your email.  I understand your 
frustration, this is a volunteer organization, and while the volunteer 
system
works well for software, it is not always great for infrastructure. 

Regardless, this is where we are.  You're asking for someone to do you a 
"favor" and fix eyebrowse.  Do you feel your tone does
it in a way that will motivate them to do so?

Let us now address the bugzilla issue.  I've noted my preference for 
this as well, however, I do not currently have the bandwidth necessary
to drive the discussion towards that.  You, however, are empowered to do 
so!  Join the infrastructure list and start the discussion.  I would
suggest that in order to be effective, you describe the problem 
(calmly), describe the solution, the best alternative and why you feel 
bugzilla would
be appropriate.  Inevitably someone will argue against it or just "for" 
the status quo.  Through persistance, offering to help manage it, etc, your
issue may be addressed.

Complaining about jakarta on this mail list will probably just peeve 
people off and serve you nothing, although you're certainly welcome to 
try it.
Is this the most judicious use of your (and others') time?

A man once said "You decide".

-Andy



Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:

Many of my users have complained that Tapestry is no longer being archived.
I did a little poke around eyebrowse, and not only is Tapestry not archived,
none of the lists seems to have been updated since late february.
Once again, its all chaos at Jakarta.  I don't understand why the folks with
the capabilities and responsibilities to handle infrastructure issues and
requests don't take five minutes to set up a BugZilla category for these
things.  Instead, it is left to endless e-mails, no tracking, nothing gets
done ...
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry


 

-Original Message-
From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 6:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Magesh Umasankar
Subject: Re: Eyebrowse problem?

On 20/3/03 21:03 "Magesh Umasankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

   

All I get when trying to look up any archived
message thread is $msgHeaders as the meat of it.
What is going on?
 

We're aware of it... Will be fixed hopefully soon...

   Pier

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Eyebrowse problem?

2003-03-23 Thread Howard M. Lewis Ship
Many of my users have complained that Tapestry is no longer being archived.
I did a little poke around eyebrowse, and not only is Tapestry not archived,
none of the lists seems to have been updated since late february.

Once again, its all chaos at Jakarta.  I don't understand why the folks with
the capabilities and responsibilities to handle infrastructure issues and
requests don't take five minutes to set up a BugZilla category for these
things.  Instead, it is left to endless e-mails, no tracking, nothing gets
done ...

--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry



> -Original Message-
> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 6:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Magesh Umasankar
> Subject: Re: Eyebrowse problem?
> 
> 
> On 20/3/03 21:03 "Magesh Umasankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > All I get when trying to look up any archived
> > message thread is $msgHeaders as the meat of it.
> > 
> > What is going on?
> 
> We're aware of it... Will be fixed hopefully soon...
> 
> Pier
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Eyebrowse problem?

2003-03-20 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 20/3/03 21:03 "Magesh Umasankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> All I get when trying to look up any archived
> message thread is $msgHeaders as the meat of it.
> 
> What is going on?

We're aware of it... Will be fixed hopefully soon...

Pier


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Eyebrowse problem?

2003-03-20 Thread Magesh Umasankar
All I get when trying to look up any archived 
message thread is $msgHeaders as the meat of it.

What is going on?

Cheers,
Magesh

***
*  Yawn: The only time some married men ever  *
*  get to open their mouth.   *
***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]