Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons

2001-03-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.

Ted Husted wrote:
 
 Since I'm the lone wolf on this point:
 
 snip
 (3.1) mailing list(s)
 jakarta-commons-general
 jakarta-commons-DBCP (database connection pool)
 jakarta-commons-sandbox (unreleased packages)
 /snip
 
 insert
 (3.1) mailing list(s)
 jakarta-commons
 /insert

I think that I do agree with both sides : but I think that you are right
in the longer term - it will be clear as it evolves that we will need to
cut down on the noise if sub-sections get active enough. In the shorter
term, the single list will be community-building.

+1

 and how about:
 
 7. In general, packages should provide an interface and one or more
 implementations of that interface, or  implement another interface
 already in use.

 
 and:
 
 23. Like all Jakarta subprojects, we adopt the Code Conventions for the
 Java Programming Language as published by Sun. In addition, we specify
 that indentation is constructed using 4 spaces only --  no tab
 characters whatsoever.

I support the notion of standardization, but some of the Sun conventions
are just awful, particularly the bit about ending the method declaration
with a '{'

Futher, I like starting blocks with a { a la

  if( foo )
  {
block
  }

I know it makes code 'big', but I personally find it easy to read, and
then if someone adds something, you don't get stuck with the bug 

  if(foo)
bar;

going to

  if(foo)
woogie;
bar;

if they forget to add the braces, which can be a bear to find,
especially when groggy and tired :)

geir

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web?  See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [PROPOSAL] The Commons

2001-03-08 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega

Hola a todos, Ted:

 Since I'm the lone wolf on this point: 
 
 snip
 (3.1) mailing list(s)
 jakarta-commons-general
 jakarta-commons-DBCP (database connection pool)
 jakarta-commons-sandbox (unreleased packages)
 /snip
 
 insert
 (3.1) mailing list(s)
 jakarta-commons
 /insert
 

+1  

 and how about: 
 
 7. In general, packages should provide an interface and one or more
 implementations of that interface, or  implement another interface
 already in use.
 

+0 

 and:
 
 23. Like all Jakarta subprojects, we adopt the Code 
 Conventions for the
 Java Programming Language as published by Sun. In addition, we specify
 that indentation is constructed using 4 spaces only --  no tab
 characters whatsoever.
 

+1721 ( it's the tabs count inside tomcat 3.3 sources :)


Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons

2001-03-08 Thread Conor MacNeill

From: "Ted Husted" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 10:57 PM
 Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons

+1 to all your changes





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons

2001-03-08 Thread Conor MacNeill

From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I support the notion of standardization, but some of the Sun conventions
 are just awful, particularly the bit about ending the method declaration
 with a '{'

+1, but I fear it is too widely used in the Java world now :-(

Getting rid of the tabs is a start, though.

Conor




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons

2001-03-08 Thread Sam Ruby

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

 Futher, I like starting blocks with a { a la

  if( foo )
  {
block
  }

Blech.  I guess it takes all kinds.  ;-)

- Sam Ruby


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [PROPOSAL] The Commons

2001-03-08 Thread Steve Downey

Jon Wrote:
Additional: the issues surrounding logging and pluggable logging
implementations are not covered here. I think they have the same importance
as configuration. My vote is that we standardize on simply using Log4J and
its interfaces for *everything*.


+1

Two logging mechanisms is infinitely worse than one logging mechanism. It's
even worse than NONE. With none, I can at least count on 21  logfile.log
getting everything.

This electronic mail transmission
may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s)
named.  Any use, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
the sender via e-mail. 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Jakarta PMC election results

2001-03-08 Thread Morgan Delagrange

Hi all,

I have no objection to the elections, but for the
benefit of the Jakarta members, could a current PMC
member please list the PMC members (current and
proposed) and which projects they are qualified to
represent?  I at least would like to know who's
speaking for what project.

- Morgan


--- Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 on 3/7/01 8:04 AM, "Sam Ruby" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  Peter Donald:  five +1's, one +0, one -1. 
   Passes.
  Diane Holt:   six +1's.Passes.
 Beyond challenge.
  Ted Husted:   five +1's, one +0.  Passes.
  Ceki Gülcü:   seven +1's.  Passes.
 Beyond challange.
  Geir Magnusson Jr.:four +1's, two +0's.
 Passes.
  Daniel F. Savarese:four +1's, two +0's.
 Passes.
  Jason van Zyl: four +1's, two +0's.
 Passes.
 
 +1
 
 -jon
 
 -- 
 If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a
 way to take
 your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
 http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/ymtd/ymtd.html
 
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


=
Morgan Delagrange
Britannica.com

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons

2001-03-08 Thread Fernando Padilla


1) There are religious battles over the hanging brace..
   let's not start one here please.  We can either follow the standard
   or not, period...  But the code should  all look the same...

   - on a side note, many people in my company have gone full circle
 first fighting for the hanging brace ( what you want ), and now
 hating having done that.. i don't why, I'm not one of those...

2) The one line "if" statements are already strongly discouraged in the
   Sun convention.. for precisely the reasons you gave

fern


 I support the notion of standardization, but some of the Sun conventions
 are just awful, particularly the bit about ending the method declaration
 with a '{'
 
 Futher, I like starting blocks with a { a la
 
   if( foo )
   {
 block
   }
 
 I know it makes code 'big', but I personally find it easy to read, and
 then if someone adds something, you don't get stuck with the bug 
 
   if(foo)
 bar;
 
 going to
 
   if(foo)
 woogie;
 bar;
 
 if they forget to add the braces, which can be a bear to find,
 especially when groggy and tired :)



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Apply tag problem propertXsl nameXsl

2001-03-08 Thread covax



Hi All!

When I use
xsl:apply nameXsl="MessageId" 
propertyXsl="MediumFormat"

instead of
xsl:apply 
xsl="proper_filename.xsl"

xalan says: 
The markup in the document preceding the root element must be 
well-formed.
but in case of "xsl:apply xsl="proper_filename.xsl"" it's 
fine...

what might be wrong?

Thanx a lot for any help



Re: PMC meeting agenda

2001-03-08 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli

Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Below is the proposed agenda.  Let me know if anybody would like to propose
 any additions or changes.

When are you planning to throw it?

Pier

-- 

Pier Fumagalli  http://www.betaversion.org/  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons

2001-03-08 Thread Jon Stevens

on 3/8/01 8:57 AM, "Ceki Glc" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 To summarize, I think that as an organization we should consider APIs on the
 basis of their merit and their respective advantages/disadvantages. Saying
 that we should adopt API XYZ just because it is Sun sponsored is not the
 wisest way to proceed. Regards, Ceki

Yes. Well said.

Primary example API's that are not being considered enough based on their
advantages/disadvantages: EJB and JSP

-jon


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Jakarta PMC election results

2001-03-08 Thread Jon Stevens

on 3/8/01 11:44 AM, "Morgan Delagrange" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 I have no objection to the elections, but for the
 benefit of the Jakarta members, could a current PMC
 member please list the PMC members (current and
 proposed) and which projects they are qualified to
 represent?  I at least would like to know who's
 speaking for what project.
 
 - Morgan

http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html

-jon


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Jakarta PMC election results

2001-03-08 Thread Morgan Delagrange

Ah, so according to the site the proposed PMC
represents:

  Peter Donald:
Avalon, Ant
  Diane Holt: 
No listing on Site, don't know her 
work
  Ted Husted: 
Site doesn't list Karma, but I know
he at least works on Struts
  Ceki Gülcü:
Log4J
  Geir Magnusson Jr.:
Velocity
  Daniel F. Savarese:
Site doesn't list Karma, probably ORO
  Hans Bergsten:
Site doesn't list Karma, don't know his
work, probably Tomcat?
  James Duncan Davidson:
Tomcat, Ant
  Pierpaolo Fumagalli:
Jserv, probably Tomcat?
  Craig McClanahan:
Jserv, Struts, probably Tomcat?
  Sam Ruby:
Site doesn't list Karma, don't know his work
(other that his Chairmanship, that is :)
  Jon S. Stevens:
JServ, ECS, Turbine
  Anil Vijendran:
Tomcat

So if you cross-reference this list against Jakarta
subprojects, you get the following subproject
representation:
 
  Ant 2
  Avalon 1
  ECS 1
  James 0
  Jetspeed 0
  JMeter 0
  Log4J 1
  ORO 1
  Regexp 0
  Slide 0
  Struts 2
  Taglibs 0
  Tomcat 5
  Turbine 1
  Velocity 1
  Watchdog 1

An improvement, I guess, but still not perfect.  The
Apache board's compliant still seems legitimate, since
we don't really know who's representing what.  

Maybe Sam could comment on the roles of the nominees,
since I'm sure he knows what project they work on, and
the site is not specific enough.

--- Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 on 3/8/01 11:44 AM, "Morgan Delagrange"
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi all,
  
  I have no objection to the elections, but for the
  benefit of the Jakarta members, could a current
 PMC
  member please list the PMC members (current and
  proposed) and which projects they are qualified to
  represent?  I at least would like to know who's
  speaking for what project.
  
  - Morgan
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/site/whoweare.html
 
 -jon
 
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


=
Morgan Delagrange
Britannica.com

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Jakarta PMC election results

2001-03-08 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli

Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Pierpaolo Fumagalli:
   Jserv, probably Tomcat?
 Craig McClanahan:
   Jserv, Struts, probably Tomcat?

Jserv is dead, and both of us are working on Tomcat 4.0

Pier

-- 

Pier Fumagalli  http://www.betaversion.org/  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Jakarta PMC election results

2001-03-08 Thread Morgan Delagrange

That list is perfect, Jon.  Thanks!

Perhaps the PMC might go as far as to designate point
person(s) for each subproject?  E.g. if nobody from
the PMC is monitoring the dev mailing list for a
particular project, they're not really in the know
despite their karma.  I know that those karma lists
are considerably longer than the people I hear from in
a typical week, which makes me fear that some are not
active participants.

--- Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 on 3/8/01 2:39 PM, "Morgan Delagrange"
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  So if you cross-reference this list against
 Jakarta
  subprojects, you get the following subproject
  representation:
  
 
 Ah, I see what you are trying to do.
 
 Actually, it is better to just look at the avail
 file and get your data that
 way. That is about as specific as possible because
 it shows who has CVS
 write access to what.
 

http://www.apache.org/websrc/viewcvs.cgi/CVSROOT/avail
 
 From that POV, you can see that there are ASF
 members and or PMC members
 involved with *every* Jakarta Project currently
 available.
 
 In reality, we should simply create another page on
 the website that lists
 things out in exact specifics. It would be something
 similar to what I
 started here:
 

http://www.apache.org/foundation/members-projects.html
 
 As you can see, I'm involved with quite a few
 projects. :-) It would be nice
 if others picked up the balls as well. I'm getting
 tired.
 
 -jon
 
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


=
Morgan Delagrange
Britannica.com

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Jakarta PMC election results

2001-03-08 Thread Sam Ruby

Morgan Delagrange wrote:

 Sam Ruby:
   Site doesn't list Karma, don't know his work
   (other that his Chairmanship, that is :)

Well, let me introduce myself then.

I was the release manager for Tomcat 3.1 and pretty much all of the
releases of Ant until 1.0.  I was a very active coder in both (primarily
focusing on getting both to work on JDK 1.1 and Windows) until they got
"good enough" for my purposes at which point I focused on community
building activities.  I spent some time nurturing the xml-soap subproject
and getting the Bean Scripting Framework open sourced.  Most recently, my
focus has been on a proposal for jakarta-alexandria by the name of "Gump",
and occasionally nudging the commons proposal in the direction I would like
to see it headed.

 Maybe Sam could comment on the roles of the nominees,
 since I'm sure he knows what project they work on,
 and the site is not specific enough.

Watch this space.  Take a look at the agenda I posted.  Pay particular
attention to items 3.2 and 5.

Also item 4.2 is the key towards the long term solution.  I personally like
the model of the Apache board where every year every board seat is up for
re-election, and all of the members get an opportunity to nominate and vote
for their choice.

- Sam Ruby

P.S.  If you want to see who has karma to which project, "cvs checkout
CVSROOT".  Look at a file by the name of avail.  Meanwhile, here is that
information in a more convenient form:

(See attached file: committers.zip)
 committers.zip

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons

2001-03-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.

Gunnar R|nning wrote:
 
 "Geir Magnusson Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 
  The thing that started this, about the coding guidelines, was in
  response to the addition of the Sun coding guidelines (rules...) - I was
  just indicating my preference.
 
 
 Of course, but it is important to be able to accept and tolerate different 
 [SNIP]

 Geir - this is not to take it out on you, but I've been pretty
 annoyed/frustrated with people trying to specify to much. Better keep it
 simple - I have no problem reading code in different styles and I usually
 keep to the style of the author if I have to modify some code. Tolerance
 and respect for cultural richness is what I advocate. Opening braces on the
 same or next line - it is still code - black or white - you're
 still a human being.

Unless I am a code generator, in which case, well, I'm a code generator.

Seriously - I have to admit I do like some regularity to coding style,
especially when we have this 'free' environment in Commons where any
committer can commit anywhere.

However, I was just indicating my dislike for some of the Sun coding
standards which seemed to be hinted at as useful for Commons.
 
 mine kroner,

Isn't that something like US$0.11?

 Gunnar
 

geir

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web?  See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]