[gentoo-dev] bison/flex extra runtime packages

2008-10-16 Thread Duft Markus
Hi there!

I'm working on a cross compilation to native windows from an Interix
Gentoo Prefix, using the normal Prefix portage tree. My setup is nearly
the same as when really cross compiling, except that I can execute what
I compile.

I use command line utilities (DEPEND atoms) from Interix, and all others
(RDEPEND, PDEPEND) from winnt.

Now some package of mine in a local overlay requires bison and flex.
It's quite hard to get those to build _and_ work on winnt, so I though
about splitting the bison ebuilds in dev-util/bison and
dev-libs/bison-runtime (and the same for flex). What do you think about
this? Before we started using portage at our company I built the
runtimes only for winnt, so I know this works (for me)... 

Is there any better Idea around?

Cheers, Markus



RE: [gentoo-dev] bison/flex extra runtime packages

2008-10-16 Thread Duft Markus
 
 On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:27:29AM +0200, Duft Markus wrote:
  Now some package of mine in a local overlay requires bison and flex.
  It's quite hard to get those to build _and_ work on winnt, so I
 though
  about splitting the bison ebuilds in dev-util/bison and
  dev-libs/bison-runtime (and the same for flex). What do you think
 about
  this? Before we started using portage at our company I built the
  runtimes only for winnt, so I know this works (for me)...
 Does yacc build+work maybe?

Hmm, haven't tried, I must admit, since our software has an explicit
depend on binson, since it uses it's runtime library. That's why I would
require distinct packages for bin and runtime. Bin should be built as
interix executable, which dependes on m4, which I just can't get to work
on winnt, and runtime should be built as winnt, since I need to link
against it.

After playing _many_ hours, this seems to be the only solution. If there
are objections against this, I can do it in a local overlay. I just
wanted to discuss it, to not do it in the overlay when others might want
this too, and just don't have time to do it :)

Cheers, Markus

 
 --
 Robin Hugh Johnson
 Gentoo Linux Developer  Infra Guy
 E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85



[gentoo-dev] RE: [gentoo-dev-announce] New developer: Michael Hammer (mueli)

2008-05-06 Thread Duft Markus
 Joinin us from Graz, Austria is Michael mueli Hammer. He will be
 joining us to maintain kerberos related packages. Michael is
 responsible
 for the infrastructure at the Graz University of Technology and they
 run
 Gentoo of course. So no longer do you have to think about moving to
 other distros as this corner hopefully stays maintained. If he does a
 poor job on it it's time for the hammer and sickle. On his free time
 Michael restores and old Mini from 1975.

Hehe, Graz on the advance ;) Welcome.

Cheers, Markus

 
 Regards,
 Petteri



RE: [gentoo-dev] New developer : Markus Duft (mduft)

2008-05-05 Thread Duft Markus
 
 On 2008-05-01 03:20, Duft Markus wrote:
  Hi!
 
  Just read the mail-archive and (i'm not at work), and felt that I
 have
  to say something about the binary packages on windows ;) (so sorry
 for
  what the outlook web-access thingy does to emails and threads :))
 
 Have you seen this?:
 http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/

Yeah thanks, i used to use this one. But (of course) it doesn't work
with the web-interface, and since a few days i'm running outlook 2007,
with which it - grml - doesn't work neither. Still with the real outlook
i managed to at least get it to quote with  ;)

Cheers, Markus

 
 --
 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



AW: [gentoo-dev] New developer : Markus Duft (mduft)

2008-05-01 Thread Duft Markus
Hi!

Just read the mail-archive and (i’m not at work), and felt that I have to say 
something about the binary packages on windows ;) (so sorry for what the 
outlook web-access thingy does to emails and threads :))

Right now we start using Gentoo Prefix as the primary development environment 
at our company. For that reason I really need a quick and easy method of 
setting up new machines with any of the three available version combinations of 
windows and interix (Interix 3.5 runs on Win2K and WinXP, Interix 5.2 runs on 
Windows Server 2003R2 only, Interix 6.0 runs on Server 2008 and Vista). For 
that purpose I wrote a setup program, which is capable of installing Interix 
itself (also the required windows components), setting up some basic things 
(for example some configurations in /etc, installing openssh, etc.), and 
finally unpacking a binary prefix snapshot.

The snapshot is basically just a tar of a freshly bootstrapped prefix (with 
some extras like gnome-terminal already compiled), normally rooted at 
/opt/gentoo. The snapshot is unpacked there, and voila – setup takes about 20 
minutes, and after that (if you have an X server running, like for example the 
open-source Xming – the free one is really unperformant though…) you can start 
gnome-terminal to start working, yeeha!

Haubi and I had the idea, that binpks would be possible too, and as a little 
extension, it would be really cool to have an installer like Cygwin has for 
example. This poses some other problems though, like runpaths etc. I think this 
approach is better usable for the planned win32 cross prefix – this one will be 
really cool: cross compile windows native binaries using parity [1] into a 
separate prefix, which contains only binaries that can run completely without 
interix (theoretically ;)).

[1] http://www.sf.net/projects/parity

Cheers, Markus

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Fabian Groffen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mi 30.04.2008 20:40
An: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Betreff: Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer : Markus Duft (mduft)
 
On 30-04-2008 21:21:06 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
 On 4/30/08, Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I think in that sense Cygwin is more Open Source, because how you get
   the primary shell/environment is available too.  However, for me that
   doesn't matter, as the OS itself is inherently non-free in that sense,
   so that's what you have to accept first thing anyway.
 
 I separate operating system and applications... Just like you run on
 HPUX or AIX... There is Windows.

Ok, then SFU is just your entry point to the system, like your login
on AIX or HPUX.

  Just for your information, we don't do stages at the moment, not in the
   forseeable future from my point of view either.  Binpkgs are in the
   planning.  In general we just do a full bootstrap, on Interix you need
   extra help from prefix-launcher.
 
 This is sad... I would really like to see fully operating portage on
 Windows... It was more important to me in the past when I actually
 used this OS...

Well... making stages takes time, but more importantly, requires you to
store them somewhere, and infra has no space for that.  I do, but my
internet connectivity is not sufficient for that.
Besides, using Portage's binary support is more flexible, as the Prefix
isn't fixed, but adjusted to your need(s).

 I this sense [1] was a great idea! You could always use quickpkg to
 extract binaries.

I probably misunderstand.  quickpkg creates binpkgs, doesn't it?

 [1] http://gentoocygwin.sourceforge.net/


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list


winmail.dat

RE: [gentoo-dev] New developer : Markus Duft (mduft)

2008-04-30 Thread Duft Markus
 It's my pleasure to introduce Markus Duft (mduft) as a new developer.
 He will go among us under the name of mduft, and will work in the
 Gentoo/Alt project porting Gentoo Prefix to Interix. Yes, people, that
 means Gentoo on Win32.

Hope this doesn't scare away people ;o) Did you have to blazen this out?

 
 Markus lives with his wife and daughter in Graz, Austria. He seems to
 have many hobbies like reading fantasy novels, building
 remote-controlled model planes, crashing remote-controlled model
 planes, and last but not least, playing good old board games with
 his wife. Err... Markus, we are a mature audience here, so no need to
 call that good old board games, OK ?

Hehe, i feel misunderstood ... :)

 
 He shares an office at work with Michael Haubenwallner (haubi), who is
 strangely also a member of the Gentoo/alt project.
 
 Please everybody, give a very warm welcome to mduft.

Thanks ... @Gilles' flamethrower: i don't think that i like it _that_ hot, but 
i haven't tried ;)

Cheers, Markus

 
 Denis.
 --
 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

���^�X�����(��j)b�b�