Re: Re : Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Constraint-Based Dependency Solver for Portage: a prototype

[Alexander Berntsen]

On 08/01/18 03:06, Michael Lienhardt wrote:
> Many thanks for the advices. I started few discussions on the forum
> and will go to FOSDEM. I'll see where it will go.
Consider mentioning this in #gentoo-fosdem on irc.freenode.net, which is
where the Gentoo devs & users who are going to FOSDEM generally gather.
Maybe you can meet up with everyone. There's usually a few Gentoo
dinners (one actual "Gentoo dinner" that everyone sign sup to, and just
informal dinners throughout the weekend as well), and an OpenPGP
key-signing event, for instance.

Good luck, and enjoy FOSDEM.
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Disable dynamic-deps by default

[Alexander Berntsen]

ACK. Finally.
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Constraint-Based Dependency Solver for Portage: a prototype

[Alexander Berntsen]

Unfortunately I am way too busy to even entertain looking into this in
any detail. A few years ago I was hoping to work on something like this,
though in Agda (or possibly in Haskell or Coq), and do work on making
Portage much more modular so that you could actually pick whatever
dependency resolver you wanted -- even going as far as "Don't like the
resolution you were presented now? Try using another resolver" messages.
But alas that job ended before I got very far.

However, I wanted to take the time to drop you a tiny note of
encouragement. I think this looks really great, and I hope someone on
the team finds the time to look into it in more detail than me.
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

[Alexander Berntsen]

On 10/07/17 20:11, Jonas Stein wrote:
> It would be so motivating to see that many user are glad about a
> special package. One gets rarely feedback.

Interesting idea. We could have some (separate) portage-y helper tool
send a standardised email that could easily be filtered based on sender
and/or topic. 'emerge foo --thank' just thanks people, 'emerge foo
--thank="msg"' thanks people with a msg.

It's gimmicky and could be abused. But then again perhaps it wouldn't be
abused, and it would just be wholesome fun. Maybe someone would meet
their future lover via the thank-parametre.

What do you think?
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Leader election

[Alexander Berntsen]

On 06/07/17 19:25, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> You can't, I declined this time around
You didn't reply here. So technically you just didn't accept. ;)

I vote for Zac then.
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Leader election

[Alexander Berntsen]

I vote for Brian.
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Leader election

[Alexander Berntsen]

On 04/07/17 22:02, Zac Medico wrote:
> Thank you, I accept.
> 
> I also nominate Brian Dolbec and Alexander Berntsen.
Thank you, I accept.


Do we vote here in the same thread?
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-portage-dev] Leader election & general development meeting

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Friends,

It's that time of year. We're having a leader election again, as well
as a general development meeting. The agenda will be updated in more
detail at: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Meetings

Please schedule a time at: http://whenisgood.net/portage

Thanks.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=1jdr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] preserve-libs: handle manually removed libraries better (bug 599240)

[Alexander Berntsen]

It's OK by me then.
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] preserve-libs: handle manually removed libraries better (bug 599240)

[Alexander Berntsen]

On 09/11/16 10:05, Zac Medico wrote:
> Before a package is merge
+d

Looks okay. What's the performance impact, if non-negligible?
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge-webrsync: use gkeys to verify gpg signatures (bug 597918)

[Alexander Berntsen]

On 27/10/16 19:16, Zac Medico wrote:
> Use gkeys to verify gpg signatures by default. Refresh the gentoo 
> snapshot signing key before signature verification, in order to
> ensure that the latest revocation data is available. Add an
> --insecure option which disables gpg signature verification. Warn
> about man-in-the-middle attacks when the --insecure option is used.
> Deprecate the pre-existing webrsync-gpg feature since it requires
> manual gpg configuration.
%s/ gpg/ OpenPGP/
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Leadership election

[Alexander Berntsen]

On 11/10/16 18:28, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> hmm, seems I've been drafted :)
OK, so Brian's the new lead. Gz.

-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: add gentoo to remote-id type.

[Alexander Berntsen]

Is there an associated bug for this? The patch itself looks reasonable
enough, but I prefer knowing the background for patches being deemed
necessary.


Also, get rid of the period in the commit message. And we seem to...
mostly... agree that it should be 'component: Capitalised description',
not 'component: lowercase description'. (No need to email a v2 for
something so trivial -- just fix it before pushing.)
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-portage-dev] Leadership election

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Friends,

It's that time of year. I have been lead developer for a year, so we
need to have another election.

I've not been very good, nor attentive enough. So if you want to elect
someone else than me, I can understand that. If nobody else wants the
role, I can probably continue to reject, and even sometimes accept,
Zac's patches too; I don't mind.

I suggest we just nominate and vote in this thread. That's what we did
last time around. Unless someone has something against this, let's
just go ahead.

On to nominations: I nominate Zac and Brian.

Let's do voting next week, and pick someone next Friday, unless anyone
objects to this.
- -- 
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=sELe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] setup.py: enable libc bindings optionally (bug 594744)

[Alexander Berntsen]

LGTM.
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] setup.py: enable libc bindings optionally (bug 594744)

[Alexander Berntsen]

On 02/10/16 05:03, Zac Medico wrote:
> The ebuild can use this
Shouldn't "this" be documented somewhere more useful than in the commit msg?

Also, the msg should mention that the libc bindings are optional in the
first place.

-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] ebuild.sh: start phases in temporary HOME if available (bug 595028)

[Alexander Berntsen]

No real opinion -- not familiar enough with this to suggest alternative
solutions. Patch itself looks OK.

-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] EventLoop: add run_until_complete method (bug 591760)

[Alexander Berntsen]

On 21/08/16 00:18, Zac Medico wrote:
> This emulates the
> asyncio.AbstractEventLoop.run_until_complete(future) interface
What's that, and why are we emulating it instead of just using it?

> which will make it possible to reduce latency in situations where it
> is desirable for a loop to exit at the earliest opportunity.
It makes it possible -- okay. But does it? I'm reluctant to change
things willy nilly, and add SLOCs, without a tangible benefit.
-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Scheduler._terminate_tasks: purge _running_tasks (bug 425554)

[Alexander Berntsen]

Woah. I remember this bug. Nice. LGTM.

-- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge: add --fuzzy-search and --search-similarity (bug 65566)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

LGTM. Thanks for addressing my previous concerns.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=fZcj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] Add emerge --autounmask-continue option (bug 582624)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 04/07/16 20:00, Zac Medico wrote:
> I wasn't aware that there was an argument about that.
I didn't argue it very heavily, but I do find it useful.

> I'll be happy to send pushed emails.
Thanks!

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=woLN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] Add emerge --autounmask-continue option (bug 582624)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Never mind. I see that it's already pushed. I guess this is where I
continue to argue my case for "Pushed as [commit hash]" emails.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=RKtx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] Add emerge --autounmask-continue option (bug 582624)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 01/07/16 18:42, Duncan wrote:
> Perhaps rename the option so it makes perfectly clear the possible
>  consequences?  Something like --autounmask-breakme, or
> --auto-breakme ?
No.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=14Rr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Enforced OpenPGP signatures

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 14/06/16 20:48, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Please file a bug to have infra turn it on for the repos you want 
> (specify them in the bug).
Thank you, Robin. Will do once I have some sort of ACK, or at least a
long enough period without NACKs.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=5mOi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-portage-dev] Enforced OpenPGP signatures

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Friends,

I saw Brian asking Michał to OpenPGP-sign his commits in IRC, to which
Michał quipped that we would have if it were enforced. So perhaps we
should just enforce it. Most of us do it -- but I see Zac not doing it
sometimes, seemingly at random. In any event, I don't think there's a
good reason *not* to sign things.

What do you think? And what's the procedure/who do we talk to, to get
a pre-push hook set up to enforce it?
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=2wKp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: flag URIs using http:// when https:// is available

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Looks OK to me, but I'll let Brian have primary ACK on repoman for
some time forward.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=HPCf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] New meeting

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Friends,

Thank you for a nice meeting. A summary has been made available along
with the full log[0].


Brian, could you upload the log to your devspace and link that instead
of the bpaste? It would be nice to have them all in the same place. If
you don't have the time, I can just put it up myself. I put the paste
to expire after one month.


[0]  
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=kkZL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] New meeting

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 07/06/16 09:48, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Could you add the topic of PMS compliance patches for me?
Done.

>> In case the latter happens, [here's a] short note
I will paste this when we begin the discussion.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Og79
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] New meeting

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

It seems the three of us who've replied are all available 2016-06-07
at 2pm UTC. That's 4pm for me. Check when it is in your timezone[0],
and I'll see you then! And remember to update the agenda[1] with your
items.


[0]

[1]  
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=PUFC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 3/3] pym/portage/util/locale.py: add a C module to help check locale

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 27/05/16 16:26, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> However, this gets bogged down in implementation details and fails 
> with musl.
Is it possible to elucidate this a bit more in a paragraph? Right now
it reads a bit like "but this fails because reasons -_o_-", but in the
future it might be nice to know said reasons.

Patch 1 and 2 look great. Patch 3 looks good to me, but obviously
Michał knows more about this so I'll let him be the judge.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXTALyAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BN6IP/0QqY6JdhzBGbNxdE3HCSDBt
kih75Hmjck6VQGlKNl+GLeML/ilTqitsVnkpbxeL3j00P69ZrW7OkZiLxGUQn+5P
9N0ljVR/FhHD5wJE3deS1IzNSERhuhSllIGKeweMIYXO3IT9tx4vDVNMB7v9zi+i
gduaxZr7byu3NSt//y+NJqHBUfxs2iWHA6+/KPDpKvs+E0hg2lycQVfsfCKFhQ/v
W+Jg5uw7Fo+6bTyUe5+b+12KlotFuHOko0unq9pt+PdT9GMek617kiMqDbXvazYf
/cgHiL1jIhSgRGbCmMVxAAo+BMp2AWrG4CyOdMHcS4shSw97jk/2NCI+1sUuuaNo
9go6ZCbLEx3LvL1kdCeR1lOk1kE6tC/lkiH1ZGMWuuYmF85qsCWgPHy1UZ+jXq1R
SkmwDXdJbbjVEzT8uVTm+hD8GyARXw7iP/1ZMLVgSRZfFGD48USIo/sVmyYdLOd5
xb90fupwpQiq49Rh+haeCN0uzSAPyAp4asrr9p409t8hH4i1sfDW/ed3jw+a/Pna
DyvPi/dY0ER9F1FnUxz4LYogm4Qa0IeFsQJUZZOlG8ekx5pBGxGqHOPH/Jx+iRLz
Pt9IvPKRInuU6LZ4gfkDvC5JfrX4DG8+PldsqItLP6GtPZSsp46f8Gdg2HUskmaD
8ESZIFkuxfL5wiKlK8Wi
=UDnS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-portage-dev] New meeting

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Brian approached me a while back saying we need a new meeting. So
let's do that. Sorry for taking so long.

So set your availability[0], and add your items to the agenda[1].


[0]  
[1]  
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=aM7+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] Colorize packages in world_sets (bug 583164)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 26/05/16 17:29, Zac Medico wrote:
> Looks good to me. ACK.
Thank you. Pushed as 40cdc1c3f467ac94d3a966777eb6a0907c269550.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=X651
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] Colorize packages in world_sets (bug 583164)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Looks OK to me, but I'll set Zac ACK it too, since he was the one
commenting on the bug.

For future reference, please use --in-reply-to when sending v2
patches, so that they're in the same email thread. It is also
customary to write what has changed since v1 beneath the '---' and
above the affected files list.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=VHQ9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Colorize packages in world_sets (bug 583164)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

You give no justification for the first commit. This commit message
has some grammar issues, so I don't know what you are trying to say in
it.

The bug has same relevant discussion. If you could give some reason
for reverting in patch 1, and clean up the message of patch 2, the
patches look good to me otherwise (although I'll have to test them of
course).

Note that you don't need a '\' inside parentheses in Python for patch 2.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=bjDF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Remove unneeded native_kwargs wrapper

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Welp that took forever to read through... I didn't see anything wrong
with it. So if tests pass and everything looks OK to you, go ahead and
push it.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=vBmo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] repoman: declare '-x', '--xmlparse' command line options obsolete

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 24/05/16 02:31, Duncan wrote:
> No argument with obsolete here, but as long as the option is still
>  allowed (even if ignored) for backward compatibility, isn't
> "deprecated" the usual term?
I meant to ask if there is any existing precedent in Portage.
"Deprecated" would be my pick as well.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=pynC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] repoman: declare '-x', '--xmlparse' command line options obsolete

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

When submitting v2-patches, please submit them in-reply-to=the message
ID of the original thread.

The patch looks OK, but I don't recall us using the "OBSOLETE" phrase
in any documentation. Does anybody know any phrase we should be using
instead, and why we should be using that phrase instead?

Maybe we should pick a term ("OBSOLETE" is fine by me), and make it
"official" for these situations in the future.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=eAJu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] news.py: Check only for major version when parsing

[Alexander Berntsen]

Only check the major version of news items, as GLEP 42 specifies an
upgrade path for them. Future revisions to news item formats may yield
minor number increments. GLEP 42 further ensures that only
forwards-compatible changes may incur, as incompatible changes demand a
major version increment.

Suggested-by:  Ulrich Müller  <u...@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Berntsen <berna...@gentoo.org>
---
 pym/portage/news.py | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/pym/portage/news.py b/pym/portage/news.py
index 784ba70..ea1b947 100644
--- a/pym/portage/news.py
+++ b/pym/portage/news.py
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ __all__ = ["NewsManager", "NewsItem", "DisplayRestriction",
"DisplayInstalledRestriction",
"count_unread_news", "display_news_notifications"]
 
+import fnmatch
 import io
 import logging
 import os as _os
@@ -270,7 +271,8 @@ class NewsItem(object):
# Optimization to ignore regex matchines on lines that
# will never match
format_match = _formatRE.match(line)
-   if format_match is not None and format_match.group(1) 
!= '1.0':
+   if (format_match is not None and
+   not 
fnmatch.fnmatch(format_match.group(1), '1.*')):
invalids.append((i + 1, line.rstrip('\n')))
break
if not line.startswith('D'):
-- 
2.7.3

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] news.py: Check only for major version when parsing

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 18/05/16 17:46, Zac Medico wrote:
> not fnmatch.fnmatch(format_match.group(1), '1.*')):
Wait, why "not"?

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXPKCxAAoJENQqWdRUGk8B7QAP/ixWgI2RU1CBXNLe+77mgxKk
rVtetbPmXyjiWgrkQvayLOVHF5JO4sh7PiH4Qpo75VhFKr48/GuIfYzt3q6b8gNn
GwP0fI0zc/fBoQYaHXI/qjyp+uCcEQAhT2yuvRFat7wRPTgSJKcbk/vsA6Eoof4c
rin3uWiWI5P+vNI7Kbmv7NNFshQ9Ak4J80AZmc+h/H0asj7Va7s/FyhlnXciL4Xh
H4H8SklefZoN+m8gPo90o6ny5PLIlDAtrdsESKXtKqKFX4OFyjkfRn3I7M+Gplki
+zrxDKGK2fYNMsgECS003cGEtnlkF2d9DTUAakCQJadKLPZXJ8kZnissBcmIqwyg
dH+1IhFUHAeBghEfan86x9SEtJ0HIEYEX/zHrknCZDLRtk5V8grlyWjA3bRYtfka
CbX6J4F0hgDPao4WHkUYp6I6NaDJTA9XwyNkX0E+GObCu9GvvdMy87DOFVVkEua9
Hlq6XAyTnMRZ3doh8eS2enDMul1qlng742BQ8D9egc49GxSl6eIZwELDS0QsTkQN
I+KNIB3ktNnxhh4FX+Gp4HPXEtsXNbXzqfNp6AbYcWh/lbH5jVZOYwuU+sJ/Ky/j
76hdj9BmNsncsPvmxxslBjJHq8SKIs3RKs+9HukFN/+zbSpGvkhi5BQQ3Tk+tPZK
Ju6X2kT2Hu3s77Wt6XjX
=t647
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] news.py: Check only for major version when parsing

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 18/05/16 17:46, Zac Medico wrote:
> if (format_match is not None and not
> fnmatch.fnmatch(format_match.group(1), '1.*')):
Yes! Sorry! I had made that change, but then forgotten to stage it. So
sorry. It's been hell of a day, so it just slipped past me. I'll get
right to it.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=1ZKx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] news.py: Check only for major version when parsing

[Alexander Berntsen]

Only check the major version of news items, as GLEP 42 specifies an
upgrade path for them. Future revisions to news item formats may yield
minor number increments. GLEP 42 further ensures that only
forwards-compatible changes may incur, as incompatible changes demand a
major version increment.

Suggested-by:  Ulrich Müller  <u...@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Berntsen <berna...@gentoo.org>
---
 pym/portage/news.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/pym/portage/news.py b/pym/portage/news.py
index 784ba70..f52d96e 100644
--- a/pym/portage/news.py
+++ b/pym/portage/news.py
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ class NewsItem(object):
# Optimization to ignore regex matchines on lines that
# will never match
format_match = _formatRE.match(line)
-   if format_match is not None and format_match.group(1) 
!= '1.0':
+   if format_match is not None and format_match.group(1) 
!= '1.*':
invalids.append((i + 1, line.rstrip('\n')))
break
if not line.startswith('D'):
-- 
2.7.3

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] pym/portage/util/locale.py: add a C module to check locale

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 17/05/16 14:47, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Since this is the first python module written in C included in
> portage, as a side effect, we introduce the machinary for future
> modules in setup.py.
Split it into two commits.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=G9ol
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dblink: add locks for parallel-install with blockers (bug 576888)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 17/05/16 15:48, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> Alexander, with 2.3.0_rc1-r1 released, I think we can re-open
> portage code for more patches before the official 2.3.0 release.
> We now know the split install is working, it only had the one
> portage bug from the split.
Great! Let's resume normal working conditions then.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=l7W4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dblink: add locks for parallel-install with blockers (bug 576888)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 16/05/16 21:20, Zac Medico wrote:
> Can we merge this now?
Yes!

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Ma++
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v5] Colorize packages in user sets (bug 577720)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

OK then. Pushed as 739845a6eab95fbc44eab1b7b938c860563631d7.

Thank you, Adam!
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=8eRG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] __eapi6_src_prepare: handle empty PATCHES array (bug 579626)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

OK. LGTM.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=GN2C
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] bin/portageq: perform case-insensitive matching for maintainer email addresses

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Pushed as 94e9bbb342ec6f2eec746f7500e9b0ae86722df7, with a slightly
wibbled commit message (primarily to make it shorter).

Please use the ML in the future, not the alias.

Thanks for the patch!
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=mF7I
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v5] Colorize packages in user sets (bug 577720)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Definitely a huge improvement over v1. Thanks a lot for taking the
time and making the effort. You've been a great contributor!

I'll leave the final word to Zac, but the patch looks OK to me now. If
it's OK by Zac, I'll merge it quick as.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=VacX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Colorize packages in user sets (bug 577720)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 20/03/16 15:33, Adam Mills wrote:
> + def isUserSet(self): +  return False +
Furthermore, this makes no sense and needs to go.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=eHbc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge: add --search-fuzzy and --search-fuzzy-cutoff options (bug 65566)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 08/04/16 08:21, Zac Medico wrote:
> Reverse? You want it to measure dissimilarity? Not sure what you
> mean.
Sorry, I meant reverse the *docs* to mean "find things that are at
least 50% similar" rather than "cut off things that aren't above the
0.5 threshold". I.e. use an inclusive sentence. I feel that this is
more clear.

> I just want it to fail if the input is invalid.
Yes, I just realised you checked if it were <=, not just <. I think
this is a bad idea. It's easily missed -- I just missed it last time
around. I would suggest to make it fail early, rather than set it to
0.0 which you then set to None. Just set it to None immediately.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=GgNP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge: add --search-fuzzy and --search-fuzzy-cutoff options (bug 65566)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

This is a great idea!


On 04/04/16 07:03, Zac Medico wrote:
> +.BR "\-\-search\-fuzzy [ y | n ]"
> +Enable or disable fuzzy search for search actions.
This is likely a good place to briefly explain what a "fuzzy search"
is.

Also, I'm not sold on "seach-fuzzy" as opposed to "fuzzy-search". Is
there a particular reasoning for it? Since we don't seem to have a
standardised "verbs mean this, nouns mean this" anyway, I would use
the latter phrase.

You also need to document your note on regexes.

Lastly, you also need to document that a fuzzy search is slower than a
regular search.

> +.TP
> +.BR "\-\-search\-fuzzy\-cutoff CUTOFF"
> +Set similarity ratio cutoff (a floating-point number between 0 and 1).
> +Results with similarity ratios lower than the cutoff are discarded.
> +This option has no effect unless the \fB\-\-search\-fuzzy\fR option
> +is enabled.
This explanation is a bit heavy to read. And I think that using 0 to 1
isn't very nice. And calling the number "floating point" instead of
decimal isn't very useful nor nice. How about making it a percentage,
and describing it simply as a similarity percentage -- "package names
must be at least N% similar to the search term to appear in search
results". The option could then be called --seach-fuzzy-similarity,
or (in keeping with the previous suggestion)
- --fuzzy-search-similarity, or -- wait for it -- something similar. ;)
Of course if you agree with this, you'll have to reverse the code to
represent which results to show, rather than which ones to not show.

You should also document here what happens if there's a mistake in the
input.

> + "--search-fuzzy-cutoff": {
> + "help": "Set similarity ratio cutoff (a floating-point 
> number between 0 and 1)",
> + "action": "store"
> + },
See comments above regarding how to explain what this actually does.

> + if myoptions.search_fuzzy_cutoff:
> + try:
> + fuzzy_cutoff = float(myoptions.search_fuzzy_cutoff)
> + except ValueError:
> + fuzzy_cutoff = 0.0
Is this a reasonable fallback? I guess so... but you need to mention
it in the manpage, as mentioned.

> +
> + if fuzzy_cutoff <= 0.0:
> + fuzzy_cutoff = None
> + if not silent:
> + parser.error("Invalid --search-fuzzy-cutoff 
> parameter: '%s'\n" % \
> + (myoptions.search_fuzzy_cutoff,))
> +
> + myoptions.search_fuzzy_cutoff = fuzzy_cutoff
> +
I also don't understand why the first one is just 0.0, but this one
is an error. Why aren't both either errors and revert to 0.8 cut-off
(or 80% similarity) or 0.0/100?

And this needs to go in the manpage too.

> + self.fuzzy_cutoff = 0.8 if fuzzy_cutoff is None else 
> fuzzy_cutoff
See above.

> + fuzzy = False
Here's an interesting discussion: maybe this should be True? After
all, it's True in any modern search engine. What do you think?

> + # Fuzzy search does not support regular expressions, 
> therefore
> + # it is disabled for regular expression searches.
Manpage.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=XsDv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] Colorize packages in user sets (bug 577720)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

I'm not too sure about the isUserSets, but unless anyone else has any
feedback, I'll test and merge this during the week.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=N3Et
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v3] EbuildBuild: call _record_binpkg_info earlier (bug 578204)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Thanks. LGTM.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=vm2N
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] runtests: fix output for skipped pythons

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Pushed as aa7558a93d42d73ad916eecd2c3e8c6c294fe735.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Id//
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cleanup: fix spaces to tabs in depgraph.py

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Pushed as 12c91bce20eeb7d6746b148b1056084a18bd8c53

Sorry for the delay. Easter break caught me by surprise.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=ucvv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Colorize packages in user sets (bug 577720)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 20/03/16 15:33, Adam Mills wrote:
> + for set_name in root_config.sets:
> + if set_name == "system":
> + system = 
> root_config.sets[set_name].findAtomForPackage(
> + pkg, 
> modified_use=self.conf.pkg_use_enabled(pkg))
> + elif set_name == "selected":
> + world = 
> root_config.sets[set_name].findAtomForPackage(
> + pkg, 
> modified_use=self.conf.pkg_use_enabled(pkg))
> + elif user_set is None and 
> root_config.sets[set_name].isUserSet():
> + user_set = 
> root_config.sets[set_name].findAtomForPackage(
> + pkg, 
> modified_use=self.conf.pkg_use_enabled(pkg))
This is really silly. At the very least try to not repeat yourself so
much.

The patch otherwise looks OK, and the idea is OK by me. Unless someone
has any big objections, I can probably merge a cleaned up patch.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=TBB6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] runtests: fix output for skipped pythons

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Replying to this email segfaulted my Thunderbird... I'll try this again:

Nice! This LGMT too, and I'll commit and push it Monday with the other
one unless there are any objections.

However, Sergei, when you're sending related patches, please send them
to the same thread. git send-email should do this by default. Bt
these patches *aren't* related, so there shouldn't be a counter there
in the first place. ;)

Thanks for the patches!
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=s0Zw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dispatch-conf: fix popen UnicodeDecode error (bug 576788)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

LGTM, but remember the plan about merging repoman first.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=enZC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dblink: add locks for parallel-install with blockers (bug 576888)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

I can't say much more than "ACK, probably makes sense" really. But
please test this *a lot* before merging it.

Regarding the merging of this patch, and th egencache patch that has
already been released: I thought we agreed that .29 should be *only*
the repoman merger, and then bug fixes go into a .30 where we try to
get a stable release with the new repoman. Why was egencache merged
anyway? Should we not merge repoman to stable ASAP before doing
anything else? That would make .29 easier.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=wGXd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] bin/portageq: add a matcher to match the orphaned (maintainer-needed) packages

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Thanks, Zac.

I was going to push it, but it seems Brian already pushed this too.
Let's try to communicate these things on the list.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=DM+e
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] bin/portageq: add a matcher to match the orphaned (maintainer-needed) packages

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 06/03/16 16:12, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> reviewed and dealt with this on IRC.
> 
> final v2 patch merged...
Oh OK...

Göktürk, please try to avoid using multiple threads for patches.

Brian, thanks for dealing with it!
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=wKGT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] getgccversion: check for clang if gcc is not found

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Shouldn't this also do a sort of "clang not found either!" type of
output?
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=n5J4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Wiki updates

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

I wibbled the ongoing-todo-list[0] slightly. We should add any
long-standing bugs to the "specific bugs" list, and we should try to
come up with some low-hanging fruit to attract newcomers.

[0]  
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=rZ04
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Wiki updates

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

I have wibbled the Membership article[0]. In the process I have also
slightly wibbled some of your roles on the main article[1].

If everyone could please ensure that they have the correct roles, and
that my description of them are good, that would be wonderful. (This
probably especially applies to you, Brian.) Please feel free to
improve anything else too, of course.

Zac, Michał, & Mike (& Pavel, but he's on devaway and I haven't heard
from him in a while): could you please replace "member" with something
more tangible? I know it is an annoying task, but please do it anyway.
:] The roles are simply meant to reflect your specialisation, not to
be straitjackets!

Thanks, everyone.

[0]  
[1]  
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=YKZw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-portage-dev] 2.2.28

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Friends,

I have added a tracker for 2.2.28[0] (and also cleaned up the 2.2.27
tracker). I've added all the bugs we've already fixed in git as
blockers, and also some bugs I think we should be looking to fix for
2.2.8; some of which I'll be looking to work on myself. If you
disagree with any of these, please feel free to remove them, but tell
me why you disagree. If you have other bugs, please add them, and
maybe describe them shortly here. I've mostly only addressed
documentation and emerge bugs.

Note that I've added some very old bugs simply because we need to get
in control of the mess -- so quite a few of them are likely RESOLVE
OBSOLETE candidates. But we need to resolve them rather than leave
them to rot.

Also note that if the bugs I've added aren't fixed, but we still need
a new release for some reason, that's fine, we'll just release it, and
change them to block the next tracker. But I want to encourage adding
as many bugs as possible as blockers, simply so we don't lose sight of
them. The small clerical task of updating a field is a small price to
pay when compared to bugs rotting.

Here are some bugs I have not added as blockers at the moment, but I
think maybe we (and by we, I guess I mostly mean Zac for most of
them...) should try to add a sort of step-by-step task for solving
them, as I think they are important:

[1] Bug 175808 (circular-deps) - emerge should intelligently solve
circular dependencies triggered by flags such as USE="doc"
[2] Bug 449094 Support for "passthru subslots" to rebuild all the
reverse dependency graph.

If you know of others, please post them.

If I've missed something else, please let me know.

Lastly, I'm going to update the wiki a bit. Clean it up slightly, and
add a "Current activity" section where I talk a bit about 2.2.28 and
the bugs we hope to fix. Maybe list some low-hanging fruits for the
release (and in general), and post them around on reddit or whatever
to try to generate some interest in the project.


[0]  
[1]  
[2]  
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=F4L9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-portage-dev] Wiki updates

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Friends,

Both for our sake and in order to attract new developers, I think we
need to make sure our Wiki stuff is nice.

I have updated our main Wiki substantially:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Project:Portage

Please make sure the information is correct and useful, and please
offer improvements if you have any ideas.

I will update the following:
* https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Membership
* https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Ongoing-TODO

The Membership wiki is somewhat outdated/obtuse, and I'd like to add a
low-hanging fruit section to the Ongoing-TODO, and brush it up to
reflect the new release.

Brian, can you make sure that these are up to date:
* 
* 

Everyone, please check if you have anything to contribute to:
* 


Any feedback and help is very useful -- thanks!
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=1E8m
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Make config update tools stand out (bug 543706)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Pushed as 3ff375e832d469f03dc922f7a30651726f86d3e0.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Eub9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Be extra clear on INSTALL_MASK & dirs (bug 527004)

[Alexander Berntsen]

Signed-off-by: Alexander Berntsen <berna...@gentoo.org>

X-Gentoo-Bug: 527004
X-Gentoo-Bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527004
---
 man/make.conf.5 | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/man/make.conf.5 b/man/make.conf.5
index 1d1cfeb..49c88ce 100644
--- a/man/make.conf.5
+++ b/man/make.conf.5
@@ -705,8 +705,8 @@ proxy server for internet access.
 \fBINSTALL_MASK\fR = \fI[space delimited list of filename patterns (globs)]\fR
 Use this variable if you want to selectively prevent certain files
 from being copied into your file system tree.  This does not work on
-symlinks, but only on actual files. Useful if you wish to filter out
-files like HACKING.gz and TODO.gz.
+symlinks, but only on actual files (including directories). Useful if
+you wish to filter out files like HACKING.gz and TODO.gz.
 
 Patterns are matched against both the absolute path and the bare
 filename of each file (or directory) to be installed.
-- 
2.4.10

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] isolated-functions.sh: Output error message for nofatal die.

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 27/01/16 23:19, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> looks good, you can push it I think can't you?
I added acked-by and the bug URL to the commit message and pushed it
as f0ce7366b137119f087974d52ae807940e74ed56.

Thanks for the patch, Ulrich!

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Ypco
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Clarify no binary packages error (bug 573070)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Pushed as 9c9165fb9420a285e8e2c62cb9ba8eb91120cb66.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=3hUK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: fix _here_doc_re to handle file redirection

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Uhm. Looks. Uhm. Brian, is this OK?

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=vgNt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Print WORKDIR & D sizes in build logs

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

testDoebuild
(portage.tests.ebuild.test_doebuild_fd_pipes.DoebuildFdPipesTestCase)...
FAIL

Travelling and stuff, but I'll try to look at it later; if you haven't
got to it by then.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=HihE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Print WORKDIR & D sizes in build logs

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 15/01/16 15:21, Michał Górny wrote:
> You make it look like you noticed it before I pinged you about it! 
> :-P
It was just a note for myself to fix it later or at least see to that
someone else fixes it.

> Looks like the test relies on the phase outputting only whatever's
>  inside. Not sure how to proceed best. Should I push all that
> output into stderr maybe, as a workaround? Or disable printing
> sizes conditionally to verboseness level?
I think 2 sounds OK. But the test is meant to catch a regression on
fd_pipes; perhaps the test should be changed rather than the code.
What do you think, Zac?
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=KngQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] portage.xml.metadata: Include maintainer type per GLEP 67

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

LGTM.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=iFdH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Print WORKDIR & D sizes in build logs

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

LGTM.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=84f9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [Patch] Repoman rewrite stage2 modularization conversion complete

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

I read through these ages ago, and I think you've incorporated my
feedback from back then. But like back then, I don't have too much
feedback to offer as this is certainly not an area of Portage I'm
nearly as familiar with as you are. It mostly just LGTM.

There are some minor issues with commit messages. Like how they
randomly don't have full stops in some sentences for some reason.
"fetches.py: Create new isVcsDir() in the vcs plugins" says "teh"
instead of "the".

ThirdPartyMirrors is a bit low on documentation.

I expect Zac will be of far more help than me. In any event, thanks a
lot for working on this!


You asked about a release on IRC -- did you want to get a release out
before merging this? I would be fine with either way. Let me know what
you need from me, and I'll get on it ASAP.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=18rr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH v3] emerge: Add --autounmask-only parameter (bug 570672)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Ta! After testing it a bit, I pushed it as
51f100e42753d6ffd3a24dfcb2ff8af0aa34966e.

I hope to see more patches from you! :-]

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=2kcS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] emerge: Add --autounmask-only parameter

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

LGTM. Thanks for this!
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWgmQ1AAoJENQqWdRUGk8B3qwP/itaogbVFoyxXqBHQT1aA0/X
WbKMyvBgpRpcfTK6GS4NEVq4AeVorUOPHFcHQFBtLJWyzr/D7CYRf11KVl4AyH0y
jSNKVZ+exvrDwCiLbim92yHh66DxyRK/kKRhrhdSb8zwnAD0YyfPGdVkAjLsZ/A2
81itvPHT7WSA0Zf9hLnk5xRq0Wnb60ZoMOBf/4q+tW07lzdQYIS2K/hnIDa/K+Zn
03sZ1ZZgeY5nzpelQNS4YRKjhrZxQmNF6WdbDyYQ/9p9HDsvSSHYjQA0ytzFY5C+
0iUhMTWR4kq0HW76057J5mOgeoC6FnHHGZIJ4kgmwX+kO70kN+uJ7Px8xKvx9vIz
eA8ncFc8uAJ+OIrsi9ehyDv6Ae6Sb3DTzdoIUrG3GEL6gCtCixEDeqBKyKfzCu6n
SpN3ykIBH1UdLpOxXRPayXq0V/IAl0k4Q5Xz+qZsmfVxizMtp55y0tgI327eClQn
vwKEGtMQplEc8Zc/JXmp2UfWDekbh8CIeEs7FHRnd3V4aYXvMlZsMEO0OESIFXl6
eIVUHSP7hjKbvuCiMQD4U2GEgTRlWqyetkre3SFzlQeUqBJ77ACs6r4xpjJXkMAi
W+tsIejIbBgiobj0+UbTjgUlfOZWGolZBCL/cSeM5+B/R6KzE0p8VnX7wptKHQmi
ekwfSL50Qwh7QgxwRWld
=qG5C
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] fs_template.gen_label: handle hash randomization

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

ACK.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=XwlQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] emerge: Add --autounmask-only parameter

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

I just remembered -- did I not ask you to add a bug for this? Did you?
If so, please add it to the commit message -- see the other messages
for how. Just add (bug ) to the header, and X-Gentoo-Bug and
X-Gentoo-Bug-url to the message.

If you did not add a bug, let me know.

I will push this once you get me a v3 with an updated commit message,
or a NACK on the bug add.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=atND
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] sqlite: enable md5 validation (bug 568934)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

These two are eh probably fine.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=jZL2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v4] egencache: add --stable-mtime option

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 21/12/15 20:57, Zac Medico wrote:
> Since the Manifest "stable mtime" behavior could have undiscovered 
> bugs
This isn't exactly very motivating. "Since Foo could have bugs"
applies to pretty much any Python code >10 lines.

The patch itself looks OK though.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Lgxj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] flat_hash: enable md5 validation for /var/cache/edb/dep (bug 568934)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 22/12/15 08:02, Zac Medico wrote:
> For forward-compatibility, add a flat_hash.mtime_md5_database
> cache module which is capable of validating cache entries
> containing either mtimes or md5 digests (only mtime validation was
> previously supported in /var/cache/edb/dep). Update the config
> class to use this cache module by default.
This doesn't motivate the use of MD5 at all. You *do* do that in the
bug report though, so I'd copy in the motivation.

Patch looks OK.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=aKo5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] flat_hash: enable md5 validation for /var/cache/edb/dep (bug 568934)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Great! Thanks. Go ahead & push.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=dfFa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] egencache: add --stable-mtime option

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

The patch looks OK.

On 20/12/15 23:32, Zac Medico wrote:
> Since the Manifest "stable mtime" behavior could be have
> undiscovered bugs, disable it by default, and add a corresponding
> egencache option.
You have an English børk here -- "could be have".

> [PATCH v2] fixes preserved_stats to contain stat results for
> self.pkgdir even if the Manifest has been removed, and also
> explains the reasoning for disabling the stable mtime behavior by
> default.
Maybe this could go into the commit message? I'd not mind a more
verbose message for this.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=iK0o
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] depgraph._resolve: consider unresolved @system atoms fatal (bug 568354)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 16/12/15 04:31, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 12:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> Since @system atoms are presumably chosen by someone who knows what
>> they are doing (usually a gentoo developer), it makes sense to consider
>> resolution failures for these atoms as fatal errors.
>>
>> X-Gentoo-Bug: 568354
>> X-Gentoo-Bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568354
> 
> Hmm, maybe this should suggest config changes, which could even be
> written with --autounmask-write. That would be much friendlier.
I have nothing against the original patch regardless.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=rkYR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: use metadata.dtd from rsync tree if available (bug 567746)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

LGTM.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=juvW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] egencache: add --stable-mtime option

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 16/12/15 06:33, Zac Medico wrote:
> Disable Manifest "stable mtime" behavior by default, and add a
> corresponding egencache option.
This message tells me nothing about why we need to do this.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=yW/c
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How do we want to deal with Arfrever's bunch of patches?

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Thanks for cleaning up guys. It won't happen again.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Qqlo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Add .git dir to excluded dirs in default PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 14/12/15 04:08, NP-Hardass wrote:
> like those that we recently experienced.
I don't know what this is in reference too, so it should be explained
better.

I have no real objects on the patch, but defer the ACK to Brian. Could
you have a look, please?
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=QPRz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-portage-dev] How do we want to deal with Arfrever's bunch of patches?

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Resending this from an address that will actually reach the list...

Friends,

As I'm sure you've noticed, Arfrever pushed a bunch of unreviewed
stuff. Michał reverted some of them as they were breaking changes in
addition to being unreviewed (oh, and of course they don't follow the
commit message format -- why would they). There's a bunch left.

Do we want to cherry-pick Zac's patches (i.e. revert Arfrever's
patches), and have him put them up for review as usual? It's a bit of
a mess because of Zac's patches. If we go down this route it would
likely be easiest for Zac to revert them, since he'll be the more
confident regarding what to keep in the ensuing merge conflicts.

Arfrever asked that someone review the patches and keep them if they
are OK, and revert only the ones that are problematic. I think this
would be OK for now, but obviously not something we want to encourage
or allow in the future.

I will not sanction a public history rewrite, but in general I'm open
to other suggestions.
- -- 
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=M0Pq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph._too_deep: fix logic when deep is True (bug 566024)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 09/12/15 07:52, Zac Medico wrote:
> When deep is True and depth is an int, the method is intended to 
> return False
What a time to be alive, people.

I almost can't believe languages can be this bad.

ACK; go ahead & push.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Ur3F
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] SyncManager: redirect command stderr to stdout (bug 566132)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 23/11/15 17:46, Zac Medico wrote:
> Since the sync modules can call a variety of different commands,
> it's hard to predict which ones will unnecessarily write to stderr.
> So, the assumption here is that the process exit status is a more
> reliable indicator for errors. For example, the python code in
> GitSync will write an error message to stderr if the git process
> exits with non-zero status.
OK, then ACK, I suppose.

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=cvLG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: autounmask for conditional USE deps (bug 566704)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Woah -- nice!

What's up with the pargs/kwargs stuff? I don't remember that stuff.

Specifically, what does
On 24/11/15 10:30, Zac Medico wrote:
> + pargs, kwargs = item
> + kwargs = kwargs.copy()
> + kwargs['collect_use_changes'] = True
> + if not self._show_unsatisfied_dep(*pargs,
> + **portage._native_kwargs(kwargs))

really do line by line?


ACK, though.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=mNTE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] SyncManager: redirect command stderr to stdout (bug 566132)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Sorry for not being up to date what this does, but the bug complains
specifically about GitHub mirrors, while the patch itself seems far
more invasive. Is it the case that they should *never* go to STDERR?

- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=g6l5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-portage-dev] Feature freeze/bugfix frenzy

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Friends,

Regarding EAPI 6: Let's not commit anything but bugfixes until 23rd.
Then we do a .6 release, aiming at getting it stabilised.

So unless there are any objections, please don't merge any non-bugfix
patches until post release. Optimally, don't merge any bugfixes not
pertaining to EAPI 6 either, unless they are trivial or can be proven
to not have ramifications[0].

Please participate in fixing EAPI 6 bugs if you can.


[0]  This is hard to do. And we are after all only talking about a few
days, so it is probably not worth it.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Y/hc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-portage-dev] Infra branch

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Friends,

Robin (robbat2) have joined the Portage team. Welcome, Robin!

He is going to launch an infra branch in order to commit necessary
hotfixes or infra-specific short-term patches, etc.

If possible and convenient he will hopefully get reviews and acks of
patches to the branch, and try to ensure that at least the committing
is done by a team member (primarily himself). However, some slack is
afforded to him by the hotfix nature of the branch.

Commits that are to be merged from infra to master need to be reviewed
and acked like any other patch.

Thanks a lot for taking on this role, Robin.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Z/Mi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] egencache: fix results when GIT_DIR is used in the environment.

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 13/11/15 18:27, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Infra can pretty much commit to anywhere; but refrain from doing
> so without somebody else reviewing our changes and stating that
> they are good. zmedico did review it, and since it wasn't committed
> yet after that, I committed it, on the assumption that he wasn't
> going to at the time.
Thanks for clearing that up for me.

> Please ping me on IRC so we can clean up the remaining historical
> Git ACLs; I count 5 people not on the wiki page with explicit bits
> to commit to Portage.git.
I will get in touch about this soon; ta for checking.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=8foa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] egencache: Delay updating Manifests until all other tasks complete

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

I'm not American -- and I would say/write penultimate. I don't very
much care though. Just pick one and fix the commit msg børk.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=51Ii
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v4] LinkageMapELF: account for {PROVIDES,REQUIRES}_EXCLUDE (bug 565792)

[Alexander Berntsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Uh this probably makes sense.

Anyone else know anything about this stuff?
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=P6oQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-