Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-04 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 170402-20:52+0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
...
> xorg.conf. Instead, I have an xorg.conf.d/nvidia.conf file:
> 
>https://pastebin.com/raw/0GsxaFRj
> 

Why not add those 30-something lines in an attachment, or straight into
the body of the message? The paste don't last really, and then when
people read on the web, how do they understand?

It was already pointed out by others on this mailing list. And esp. this
one is just 28 lines ...

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Section "Device"
Identifier  "Device0"
Driver  "nvidia"
VendorName  "NVIDIA Corporation"
Option  "TripleBuffer" "True"
Option  "NoLogo"   "True"
Option  "DynamicTwinView"  "False"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Device0"
Monitor"XG2703-GS"
DefaultDepth 24
Option "UseEdidFreqs" "TRUE"
Option "TwinView" "0"

SubSection "Display"
Depth  24
EndSubSection
EndSection

Section "ServerFlags"
Option "BlankTime" "0"
Option "StandbyTime" "0"
Option "SuspendTime" "0"
Option "OffTime" "0"
EndSection

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Regards!

-- 
Miroslav Rovis
Zagreb, Croatia
https://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-04 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 16:45:07 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> Until I do
>> that, I won't know if I need a xorg file or just a couple files in
>> xorg.conf.d or something else.  That also is not to mention that I have
>> no idea what needs to go into those new files at this time, if anything
>> is needed. 
> The files in xorg.conf.d are just xorg.conf split up into manageable
> chunks. It's analogous to having /etc/portage/package.use as a file or a
> directory.
>
>


That helps.  At least I know if I have a mouse problem, I can copy the
mouse section into its file and fix that.  I sort of figured it would be
something like that but wasn't sure.  Knowing helps. 

One thing I would like to do, set up my monitor and TV properly.  I'd
like my TV to work separate from my monitor.  I'm pretty sure I can do
that with the video card I have.   I use the DB15HD output for my
monitor and the HDMI for my TV.  I read somewhere that the card can
drive each independently.  In other words, one can have one picture and
the other something else.  I'd like to have smplayer go to the TV and my
desktop be, well, what it is now. 

Maybe one of these days I'll get around to working on this stuff.  Right
now, I'm cutting trees, planting tree seeds, and planting garden stuff
and building beds for the garden.  Not to mention, there's always a
friend needing something. 

Thanks for the info. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 16:45:07 -0500, Dale wrote:

> Until I do
> that, I won't know if I need a xorg file or just a couple files in
> xorg.conf.d or something else.  That also is not to mention that I have
> no idea what needs to go into those new files at this time, if anything
> is needed. 

The files in xorg.conf.d are just xorg.conf split up into manageable
chunks. It's analogous to having /etc/portage/package.use as a file or a
directory.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Windows '96 artificial intelligence: Unable to FORMAT A: Having a go at C:


pgpDeUb45O6_O.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-04 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 04/02/2017 07:35 AM, Dale wrote:
>> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> On 04/02/2017 06:55 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
   My best guess is that the problem was due to a recent update to
 x11-base/xorg-server  On both my systems it now requires USE="glamor".
 This may require changes to xorg.conf.  On my main desktop, with no
 xorg.conf, X does the detection and configuration
 "auto-magically".  The
 hot backup machine would have an old xorg.conf with old (i.e. wrong)
 settings for the updated xorg-server.
>>>
>>> This has been the case for many years now. Anyway, better late than
>>> never :-P
>>>
>>> You do sometimes need some custom settings though. This goes in
>>> seperate *.conf files now, which must be inside the
>>> /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ directory. Some packages can place a config file
>>> there automatically.
>>
>> I still have a xorg.conf file here.  May have to test removing it one
>> day.  I also have a file in the xorg.conf.d/ directory.  After it reads
>> my file, will it also read the file in the directory or does it ignore
>> anything else since I have the old file?  The file is named
>> 20opengl.conf.
>>
>> I seem to recall trying to run without it ages ago and something not
>> working.  Can't recall what it was since it was a good long while back.
>
> If you don't *need* an xorg.conf (and you don't, otherwise you'd know
> :-P) then it's best to not have one. It's nothing dangerous to try.
> Just move it somewhere else and logout/login. If something breaks,
> just move the file back (or better, see what option you have in it
> that seems you need to provide manually, and split that into a .conf
> file inside xorg.conf.d. That's how I configure my nvidia driver. I
> have no xorg.conf. Instead, I have an xorg.conf.d/nvidia.conf file:
>
>   https://pastebin.com/raw/0GsxaFRj
>
> It's a good system. I can do small, "surgical" tweaks to options
> without having to maintain a full xorg.conf file.
>
>
>

As I mentioned earlier, I tried it without a xorg file a while back and
it didn't work.  That is how I knew I had to keep my old one.  Until I
try it again, then I won't know if I need one or not.  I didn't have
anything special when I tried it last time, single monitor and a normal
video card, and it was needed then.  Now I have a monitor but also a TV
connected that I watch shows on.  My current setup is a bit more
complicated now than it was then. 

Thing is, I don't have time to test this right now.  I don't want to
start to test it, get involved in getting it working and only get part
way through only to find out I have something else I have to go do.  If
I'm going to start it, I'd like to have time to finish it.  Until I do
that, I won't know if I need a xorg file or just a couple files in
xorg.conf.d or something else.  That also is not to mention that I have
no idea what needs to go into those new files at this time, if anything
is needed. 

Maybe some day soon.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue,  4 Apr 2017 22:27:57 +0200 (CEST), k...@aspodata.se wrote:

> > I have an /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/mouse.conf file. I use it to set the 
> > default acceleration profile. In your case, you should be able to
> > delete your xorg.conf and instead just use this in mouse.conf:
> > 
> >Section "InputDevice"
> >Identifier  "Mouse0"
> >Driver  "mouse"
> >Option  "Device"   "/dev/whatever_you_use_currently"
> >Option  "Protocol" "MouseMan"
> >EndSection  
> 
> Thanks for the idea, will check how xorg.conf and xorg.conf.d relate to 
> each other.

They are the same thing. One approach puts everything in one file, one
puts it in separate files that are easier to maintain. The system doesn't
care, it's there for your convenience. However using both is not
documented and probably not a good idea for that reason.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Nothing is illegal if one hundred businessmen decide to do it.


pgpvnrCNDs_Pm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-04 Thread karl
Nikos:
> On 04/04/2017 12:11 AM, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> > Walter Dnes:
> > ...
> >>   This state of affairs seems to have evolved slowly.  There wasn't one
> >> version where it worked for nobody, immediately followed by the next
> >> version that worked for everybody.  Years ago, X would not run without
> >> an xorg.conf file.  Then X started being able to properly autoconfigure
> >> without an xorg.conf file for 10% of users...  then 20%... then 30%,
> >> etc.  Today it works for just about everybody.
> >
> > No for me, I still use a serial mouse with mman protocol.
> 
> I have an /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/mouse.conf file. I use it to set the 
> default acceleration profile. In your case, you should be able to delete 
> your xorg.conf and instead just use this in mouse.conf:
> 
>Section "InputDevice"
>Identifier  "Mouse0"
>Driver  "mouse"
>Option  "Device"   "/dev/whatever_you_use_currently"
>Option  "Protocol" "MouseMan"
>EndSection

Thanks for the idea, will check how xorg.conf and xorg.conf.d relate to 
each other.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

---
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57





[gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-04 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 04/04/2017 12:11 AM, k...@aspodata.se wrote:

Walter Dnes:
...

  This state of affairs seems to have evolved slowly.  There wasn't one
version where it worked for nobody, immediately followed by the next
version that worked for everybody.  Years ago, X would not run without
an xorg.conf file.  Then X started being able to properly autoconfigure
without an xorg.conf file for 10% of users...  then 20%... then 30%,
etc.  Today it works for just about everybody.


No for me, I still use a serial mouse with mman protocol.


I have an /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/mouse.conf file. I use it to set the 
default acceleration profile. In your case, you should be able to delete 
your xorg.conf and instead just use this in mouse.conf:


  Section "InputDevice"
  Identifier  "Mouse0"
  Driver  "mouse"
  Option  "Device"   "/dev/whatever_you_use_currently"
  Option  "Protocol" "MouseMan"
  EndSection





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-03 Thread karl
Walter Dnes:
...
>   This state of affairs seems to have evolved slowly.  There wasn't one
> version where it worked for nobody, immediately followed by the next
> version that worked for everybody.  Years ago, X would not run without
> an xorg.conf file.  Then X started being able to properly autoconfigure
> without an xorg.conf file for 10% of users...  then 20%... then 30%,
> etc.  Today it works for just about everybody.

No for me, I still use a serial mouse with mman protocol.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

---
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-03 Thread Walter Dnes
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 08:52:57PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote

> If you don't *need* an xorg.conf (and you don't, otherwise you'd know 
> :-P) then it's best to not have one.

  This state of affairs seems to have evolved slowly.  There wasn't one
version where it worked for nobody, immediately followed by the next
version that worked for everybody.  Years ago, X would not run without
an xorg.conf file.  Then X started being able to properly autoconfigure
without an xorg.conf file for 10% of users...  then 20%... then 30%,
etc.  Today it works for just about everybody.

-- 
Walter Dnes 
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-02 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 04/02/2017 12:18 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 23:35:59 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
 You do sometimes need some custom settings though. This goes in
 seperate *.conf files now, which must be inside the
 /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ directory. Some packages can place a config file
 there automatically.
>>
>> Packages shouldn't do that, /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d is for local
>> configuration files. Packages are supposed to use
>> /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d
>
> Oh. Then I guess some runtime program generates files there. I have two:
>
>   00-keyboard.conf
>   20opengl.conf
>
> It seems eselect generates the opengl one, but the other I don't now
> where it came from:
>
>   # Read and parsed by systemd-localed. It's probably wise not
>   # to edit this file manually too freely.
>   Section "InputClass"
> Identifier "system-keyboard"
> MatchIsKeyboard "on"
> Option "XkbLayout" "us"
> Option "XkbModel" "pc105+inet"
> Option "XkbOptions" "terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp"
>   EndSection
>
> I assumed the systemd package installed it there. (I don't use
> systemd, but I have it installed.) Now I see that "qfile" doesn't find
> a package this belongs to, so it's been put there by some daemon or
> other program probably.
>
>
> .
>


If it helps narrow the options down, I don't have systemd here.  I think
it was Neil that suggested eselect generates it and puts it there, or
just puts it there. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 



[gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-02 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 04/02/2017 07:35 AM, Dale wrote:

Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

On 04/02/2017 06:55 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:

  My best guess is that the problem was due to a recent update to
x11-base/xorg-server  On both my systems it now requires USE="glamor".
This may require changes to xorg.conf.  On my main desktop, with no
xorg.conf, X does the detection and configuration "auto-magically".  The
hot backup machine would have an old xorg.conf with old (i.e. wrong)
settings for the updated xorg-server.


This has been the case for many years now. Anyway, better late than
never :-P

You do sometimes need some custom settings though. This goes in
seperate *.conf files now, which must be inside the
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ directory. Some packages can place a config file
there automatically.


I still have a xorg.conf file here.  May have to test removing it one
day.  I also have a file in the xorg.conf.d/ directory.  After it reads
my file, will it also read the file in the directory or does it ignore
anything else since I have the old file?  The file is named 20opengl.conf.

I seem to recall trying to run without it ages ago and something not
working.  Can't recall what it was since it was a good long while back.


If you don't *need* an xorg.conf (and you don't, otherwise you'd know 
:-P) then it's best to not have one. It's nothing dangerous to try. Just 
move it somewhere else and logout/login. If something breaks, just move 
the file back (or better, see what option you have in it that seems you 
need to provide manually, and split that into a .conf file inside 
xorg.conf.d. That's how I configure my nvidia driver. I have no 
xorg.conf. Instead, I have an xorg.conf.d/nvidia.conf file:


  https://pastebin.com/raw/0GsxaFRj

It's a good system. I can do small, "surgical" tweaks to options without 
having to maintain a full xorg.conf file.





[gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-02 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 04/02/2017 12:18 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:

On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 23:35:59 -0500, Dale wrote:


You do sometimes need some custom settings though. This goes in
seperate *.conf files now, which must be inside the
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ directory. Some packages can place a config file
there automatically.


Packages shouldn't do that, /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d is for local
configuration files. Packages are supposed to use
/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d


Oh. Then I guess some runtime program generates files there. I have two:

  00-keyboard.conf
  20opengl.conf

It seems eselect generates the opengl one, but the other I don't now 
where it came from:


  # Read and parsed by systemd-localed. It's probably wise not
  # to edit this file manually too freely.
  Section "InputClass"
Identifier "system-keyboard"
MatchIsKeyboard "on"
Option "XkbLayout" "us"
Option "XkbModel" "pc105+inet"
Option "XkbOptions" "terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp"
  EndSection

I assumed the systemd package installed it there. (I don't use systemd, 
but I have it installed.) Now I see that "qfile" doesn't find a package 
this belongs to, so it's been put there by some daemon or other program 
probably.





[gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-02 Thread Jonathan Callen
On 04/02/2017 09:40 AM, Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 23:35:59 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
 You do sometimes need some custom settings though. This goes in
 seperate *.conf files now, which must be inside the
 /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ directory. Some packages can place a config file
 there automatically.
>> Packages shouldn't do that, /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d is for local
>> configuration files. Packages are supposed to use
>> /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d
>
> According to this, nothing put it there.  I know I didn't put it there.
>
>
> root@fireball / # equery b /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20opengl.conf
>  * Searching for /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20opengl.conf ...
> root@fireball / #
>
>
> Makes one wonder, where did that come from?
>

It is automatically generated by eselect-opengl, which means it does
need to be in /etc.  It is used to tell Xorg which OpenGL libraries to
use, so that it doesn't have to make a bunch of symlinks in /usr
anymore.  If you aren't using proprietary xorg drivers, then it doesn't
actually change any settings.

-- 
Jonathan Callen



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-02 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 23:35:59 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>>> You do sometimes need some custom settings though. This goes in
>>> seperate *.conf files now, which must be inside the
>>> /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ directory. Some packages can place a config file
>>> there automatically.
> Packages shouldn't do that, /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d is for local
> configuration files. Packages are supposed to use
> /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d

According to this, nothing put it there.  I know I didn't put it there. 


root@fireball / # equery b /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20opengl.conf
 * Searching for /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20opengl.conf ...
root@fireball / #


Makes one wonder, where did that come from?

>> I still have a xorg.conf file here.  May have to test removing it one
>> day.  I also have a file in the xorg.conf.d/ directory.  After it reads
>> my file, will it also read the file in the directory or does it ignore
>> anything else since I have the old file?  The file is named
>> 20opengl.conf. 
> Both are read. I believe the xorg.conf.d files have higher precedence
> but the xorg.conf man page is unclear on this.
>
>


H.  Well at least everything works, so far.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 23:35:59 -0500, Dale wrote:

> > You do sometimes need some custom settings though. This goes in
> > seperate *.conf files now, which must be inside the
> > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ directory. Some packages can place a config file
> > there automatically.

Packages shouldn't do that, /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d is for local
configuration files. Packages are supposed to use
/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d

> I still have a xorg.conf file here.  May have to test removing it one
> day.  I also have a file in the xorg.conf.d/ directory.  After it reads
> my file, will it also read the file in the directory or does it ignore
> anything else since I have the old file?  The file is named
> 20opengl.conf. 

Both are read. I believe the xorg.conf.d files have higher precedence
but the xorg.conf man page is unclear on this.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

In possession of a mind not merely twisted, but actually sprained.


pgpLiCD6SHbf0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-01 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 04/02/2017 06:55 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>>   My best guess is that the problem was due to a recent update to
>> x11-base/xorg-server  On both my systems it now requires USE="glamor".
>> This may require changes to xorg.conf.  On my main desktop, with no
>> xorg.conf, X does the detection and configuration "auto-magically".  The
>> hot backup machine would have an old xorg.conf with old (i.e. wrong)
>> settings for the updated xorg-server.
>
> This has been the case for many years now. Anyway, better late than
> never :-P
>
> You do sometimes need some custom settings though. This goes in
> seperate *.conf files now, which must be inside the
> /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ directory. Some packages can place a config file
> there automatically.
>
>
>

I still have a xorg.conf file here.  May have to test removing it one
day.  I also have a file in the xorg.conf.d/ directory.  After it reads
my file, will it also read the file in the directory or does it ignore
anything else since I have the old file?  The file is named 20opengl.conf. 

I seem to recall trying to run without it ages ago and something not
working.  Can't recall what it was since it was a good long while back. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 



[gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: A reason *NOT* to have xorg.conf file

2017-04-01 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 04/02/2017 06:55 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:

  My best guess is that the problem was due to a recent update to
x11-base/xorg-server  On both my systems it now requires USE="glamor".
This may require changes to xorg.conf.  On my main desktop, with no
xorg.conf, X does the detection and configuration "auto-magically".  The
hot backup machine would have an old xorg.conf with old (i.e. wrong)
settings for the updated xorg-server.


This has been the case for many years now. Anyway, better late than 
never :-P


You do sometimes need some custom settings though. This goes in seperate 
*.conf files now, which must be inside the /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ 
directory. Some packages can place a config file there automatically.