Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Slightly Complex Hard Drive Question

2005-04-15 Thread Robert G. Hays
inlining...
Oh, If you have sata, I do not speak SATA yet; so in that case my advice 
might be "deprecated"...  J.I.C.!

Tom Moyer wrote:
my dvd drive is only like 2 monthes old.  It is a Memorex Dual Layer
DVD+/- RW I think it is fairly fast.  I guess now I'm just wondering
would it be worth my time to make my gentoo drive my primary master, a
second hard drive the primary slave, the last hard drive the secondary
slave, and the dvd burner the secondary slave.
Dual-layers have been being slower than singles -- I am not sure whether 
this is still true or not ..

(BTW CD_1x=150KB/sec, DVD_1x=~1350KB/sec.)
I repeat: if the specs on your dvd Data Throughput are rougly as fast as 
your hdisk, then the two busyest hdisks should be on different channels, 
otherwise, put the two busyest on the same chanel & the dvd on the other 
with your slowest hdisk. 

Note re dvd speed: I mean the interface's speed, which is NOT 
necessarily the same as the dvd's 'speed'; check your documentation 
*carefully* for specs.  I my experience it is usually Not in the specs, 
alas...  Thus, presume that your dvd'd interface is probably *much* 
slower than yourhdisk's.
(Anyone who *knows* that I am wrong, *please* jump in and correct me!)

And with a blazingly fast dvd, it works faster to hdisk if hdisk is on 
other channel, but unless dvd is *Blazingly* fast, this Will Not matter 
-- hdisks are much (!!) faster than opticals (unless this has changed in 
the last 6 months or so).  I'd assume it doesn't matter.

Myself, I keep the internal optical as ide1m, any 3rd hdisk as ide1s; if 
optical is old/slow (currently), this also makes 3rd hdisk a bit slower. 
This means that my two busyest hdisks are on the same channel & thus 
slowed down a little bit by this, but for me, I still get better 
throughput this way.  YMMV!

SO: to answer your question about moving things, I doubt it;  I *could* 
be wrong, but  I doubt the move is worth-while.

Without the interface-specs on the dvd, that's really the best anyone 
can say.

Best,
rgh.
On 4/14/05, Robert G. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 

He has a very good point.
The other thought is do you have a CD or DVD in one of the channels?
If so, you need to check that the cd/dvd is as fast as your hdisk,
because a channel can only talk as fastas the slowest drive on it; to
talk aste would be to confuse the slow device & maybe cause it to cause
a computer crash or at least loss of data.
If it is an older CD or DVD, especially CD, there is a good chance that
it will slow down the hdisk on the same channel, so you need to take
that into account while you are deciding which goes where for what use.
His point is still valid.  Especially if you have a fast cd/dvd or none.
rgh.
Kashani wrote:
om Moyer wrote:
lso from one response: "Put the drives on separate channels."
Why?  I want to use all three for Gentoo if possible.
y mentioning it was more of a pointer for you to think about which
drives you were going to be using most often rather than /dev/hd?
ascetics. If you have the two heavily used drives on the same IDE
channel you'll see some slow downs on your I/O.
kashani
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Slightly Complex Hard Drive Question

2005-04-14 Thread William Kenworthy
drives on separate channels: ide busses que commands serially, and wait
for responses tying up the channel.  The workaround is to put your high
throughput devices on separate channels, keep generally slower cdroms
away from faster devices, and keep cd burners on their own channel. 

 Yes, rather difficult to set up, so on a modern system you need to
think carefully where you put devices to get the best performance, and
reduce cd coaster production etc.  I am not sure how sata fits into this
scheme though?  scsi does not suffer this problem to the same extent:
the advantage of scsi is not just speed which is why they are best for
busy servers.

BillK

On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 16:15 -0500, Tom Moyer wrote:
> Alright it seems like there was some confusion.
> hda (40 Gig) has only Windows XP with Grub installed to it's MBR
> hdb (120 Gig) has only Gentoo (all partitions including /boot)
> hdc(30 Gig) currently unused
> 
> I would like to swap hda and hdb.
> 
> From what I could gather all this would involve is physically swapping
> the drives and then reinstalling Grub and modifying /etc/fstab to
> point to new partitons.
> 
> I don't want to swap any data across the drives I just want to have
> Gentoo be the only OS installed.
> 
> Also from one response: "Put the drives on separate channels."
> Why?  I want to use all three for Gentoo if possible.
> 
> Thanks
> Tom
> 
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
-- 
William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home!

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Slightly Complex Hard Drive Question

2005-04-14 Thread Tom Moyer
my dvd drive is only like 2 monthes old.  It is a Memorex Dual Layer
DVD+/- RW I think it is fairly fast.  I guess now I'm just wondering
would it be worth my time to make my gentoo drive my primary master, a
second hard drive the primary slave, the last hard drive the secondary
slave, and the dvd burner the secondary slave.

On 4/14/05, Robert G. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He has a very good point.
> 
> The other thought is do you have a CD or DVD in one of the channels?
> 
> If so, you need to check that the cd/dvd is as fast as your hdisk,
> because a channel can only talk as fastas the slowest drive on it; to
> talk aste would be to confuse the slow device & maybe cause it to cause
> a computer crash or at least loss of data.
> 
> If it is an older CD or DVD, especially CD, there is a good chance that
> it will slow down the hdisk on the same channel, so you need to take
> that into account while you are deciding which goes where for what use.
> 
> His point is still valid.  Especially if you have a fast cd/dvd or none.
> 
> rgh.
> 
> Kashani wrote:
> 
> > Tom Moyer wrote:
> >
> >> Also from one response: "Put the drives on separate channels."
> >> Why?  I want to use all three for Gentoo if possible.
> >>
> >
> > My mentioning it was more of a pointer for you to think about which
> > drives you were going to be using most often rather than /dev/hd?
> > ascetics. If you have the two heavily used drives on the same IDE
> > channel you'll see some slow downs on your I/O.
> >
> > kashani
> > --
> > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >
> 
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
>

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Slightly Complex Hard Drive Question

2005-04-14 Thread Robert G. Hays
inlining...
Tom Moyer wrote:
yeah but i don't think i will right away i thought I could get qemu to
run Windows XP but it seems there is a bug in it that prevents it from
booting correctly so I'll wait to do this for now.
I figured that the system would be more organized if i moved the
promary drive(120 Gig with Gentoo) to primary master (hda) instead of
leaving it as primary slave (hdb).  I guess it really doesn't matter
though.
No, if the 40G/XP drive is doing nothing as hda, and grub boots you to 
gentoo on hdb, and your other 30G does whatever it does, this is as good 
as it gets (ref two recent messages about the two channels and optical 
drives).

Swapping won't make the channel/drives any faster, you're correct. 
(1/20th of one percent faster -- I doubt it, those days should be long 
gone.)

rgh.
On 4/14/05, Robert G. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 

Tom Moyer wrote:
   

I would like to swap hda and hdb.
I don't want to swap any data across the drives I just want to have
Gentoo be the only OS installed.
 

Linux, including Gentoo, can run from any drive in the system.
If Gentoo is not already your default boot from Grub, you can easily
make it so; ask this if needed.
If you want to COMPLETELY remove XP from the box, that is easy too,
erase its partition and create another one (or more) there  to use as
you like.  If, ask.
If you don't want to swap any data from drive-x to drive-y, then you
will not be able to use new partitions as /, /usr, /var, etc, since
these are all already defined, so the newly-empty space would be, for
instsance, /work or .music or whatever.
I am not sure I understand the first two lines above, but if I
understand #3 correctly, you __do__ want to *completely* erase XP, right?
rgh.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
   

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Slightly Complex Hard Drive Question

2005-04-14 Thread Robert G. Hays
He has a very good point.
The other thought is do you have a CD or DVD in one of the channels?
If so, you need to check that the cd/dvd is as fast as your hdisk, 
because a channel can only talk as fastas the slowest drive on it; to 
talk aste would be to confuse the slow device & maybe cause it to cause 
a computer crash or at least loss of data.

If it is an older CD or DVD, especially CD, there is a good chance that 
it will slow down the hdisk on the same channel, so you need to take 
that into account while you are deciding which goes where for what use.

His point is still valid.  Especially if you have a fast cd/dvd or none.
rgh.
Kashani wrote:
Tom Moyer wrote:
Also from one response: "Put the drives on separate channels."
Why?  I want to use all three for Gentoo if possible.
My mentioning it was more of a pointer for you to think about which 
drives you were going to be using most often rather than /dev/hd? 
ascetics. If you have the two heavily used drives on the same IDE 
channel you'll see some slow downs on your I/O.

kashani
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Slightly Complex Hard Drive Question

2005-04-14 Thread Tom Moyer
yeah but i don't think i will right away i thought I could get qemu to
run Windows XP but it seems there is a bug in it that prevents it from
booting correctly so I'll wait to do this for now.
I figured that the system would be more organized if i moved the
promary drive(120 Gig with Gentoo) to primary master (hda) instead of
leaving it as primary slave (hdb).  I guess it really doesn't matter
though.

On 4/14/05, Robert G. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Moyer wrote:
> 
> >I would like to swap hda and hdb.
> >I don't want to swap any data across the drives I just want to have
> >Gentoo be the only OS installed.
> >
> Linux, including Gentoo, can run from any drive in the system.
> 
> If Gentoo is not already your default boot from Grub, you can easily
> make it so; ask this if needed.
> 
> If you want to COMPLETELY remove XP from the box, that is easy too,
> erase its partition and create another one (or more) there  to use as
> you like.  If, ask.
> 
> If you don't want to swap any data from drive-x to drive-y, then you
> will not be able to use new partitions as /, /usr, /var, etc, since
> these are all already defined, so the newly-empty space would be, for
> instsance, /work or .music or whatever.
> 
> I am not sure I understand the first two lines above, but if I
> understand #3 correctly, you __do__ want to *completely* erase XP, right?
> 
> rgh.
> 
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
>

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Slightly Complex Hard Drive Question

2005-04-14 Thread Kashani
Tom Moyer wrote:
Also from one response: "Put the drives on separate channels."
Why?  I want to use all three for Gentoo if possible.
My mentioning it was more of a pointer for you to think about which 
drives you were going to be using most often rather than /dev/hd? 
ascetics. If you have the two heavily used drives on the same IDE 
channel you'll see some slow downs on your I/O.

kashani
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Slightly Complex Hard Drive Question

2005-04-14 Thread Robert G. Hays
Tom Moyer wrote:
I would like to swap hda and hdb.
I don't want to swap any data across the drives I just want to have
Gentoo be the only OS installed.
Linux, including Gentoo, can run from any drive in the system.
If Gentoo is not already your default boot from Grub, you can easily 
make it so; ask this if needed.

If you want to COMPLETELY remove XP from the box, that is easy too, 
erase its partition and create another one (or more) there  to use as 
you like.  If, ask.

If you don't want to swap any data from drive-x to drive-y, then you 
will not be able to use new partitions as /, /usr, /var, etc, since 
these are all already defined, so the newly-empty space would be, for 
instsance, /work or .music or whatever.

I am not sure I understand the first two lines above, but if I 
understand #3 correctly, you __do__ want to *completely* erase XP, right?

rgh.

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


[gentoo-user] Re: Slightly Complex Hard Drive Question

2005-04-14 Thread Tom Moyer
Alright it seems like there was some confusion.
hda (40 Gig) has only Windows XP with Grub installed to it's MBR
hdb (120 Gig) has only Gentoo (all partitions including /boot)
hdc(30 Gig) currently unused

I would like to swap hda and hdb.

>From what I could gather all this would involve is physically swapping
the drives and then reinstalling Grub and modifying /etc/fstab to
point to new partitons.

I don't want to swap any data across the drives I just want to have
Gentoo be the only OS installed.

Also from one response: "Put the drives on separate channels."
Why?  I want to use all three for Gentoo if possible.

Thanks
Tom

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list