Re: [Gimp-developer] What's the status of mng support?

2002-11-18 Thread Nick Lamb
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 08:50:16AM -0500, David Weeks wrote:
> Also, I've noticed my gimp png's transparentcy isn't showing correctly in 
> Microsoft IE.  Is this a bug with gimp, or MSIE?

Windows IE bug, known by Microsoft for at least five years.

Re: MNG support
GIMP needs better animation support, perhaps even a (small) extra software
package dedicated to this task. Every frame should be able to have
multiple, sometimes common, layers.

e.g.

Picture of House + Bird with wings up + Man walk frame #1
Picture of House + Bird with wings down + Man walk frame #2
Picture of House + Bird with wings up + Man walk frame #3
Picture of House + Bird with wings down + Man walk frame #1
Picture of House + Bird with wings up + Man walk frame #2
Picture of House + Bird with wings down + Man walk frame #3

This needs 6 layers, six PNG (or JNG) sub-images in MNG and makes
a 6 frame anim loop that's much tinier than the equivalent GIF.

I have no idea who will volunteer to do all this :(
Meanwhile a MNG anim output equivalent to a layer->anim GIF save
is not too difficult as a plug-in.

Nick.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



[Gimp-developer] What's the status of mng support?

2002-11-18 Thread David Weeks
Hi,

Sorry if this has been recently addressed, I'm new to this list.

I want to work in the mng http://www.libpng.org/pub/mng/#history format, and 
don't recall gimp supporting it, ie -- it's not a save option.

Too bad to, cause the png provides gorgious transparency, and mng provides 
gorgious animations with transparency.

Also, I've noticed my gimp png's transparentcy isn't showing correctly in 
Microsoft IE.  Is this a bug with gimp, or MSIE?

Dave
http://www.tampapc.com
-- 
You can call me at: 813-236-2009, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shop TampaPC.com!
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] questions about the cvs structure

2002-11-18 Thread Christian Rose
mån 2002-11-18 klockan 14.32 skrev Jay Yan:
> >>Then I tried cvs -z3 co -r gimp-1-3 gimp, of course I failed, it said: 
> >>"no such tag gimp-1-3"
> >
> >Yes, that's correct. There's no "gimp-1-3" branch. As the page says, the
> >"HEAD" branch is for GIMP 1.3 development. The HEAD branch is what you
> >get if you just use "cvs -z3 co gimp".
>
> Thanks, Christian.
> 
> Are there branchs for gimp-1.3.9, gimp-1.3.10?  if there are not, how 
> does gimp release? from head branch?

I really doubt there are branches for each individual release. There's
not much point in that unless there are plans on continuing development
on each release even after they are released, which I doubt. Branches
are intended for different code paths and major redesigns.
However, the individual releases are tagged in cvs, and each one of the
releases has a tag.

If the distinction between branches and tags are unclear, I recommend a
read in the documentation at http://www.cvshome.org/ or
http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/ or any other CVS documentation resource on
the net. These things aren't trivial when introduced to the first time,
but thankfully there are lots of good documentation resources.


Christian


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] questions about the cvs structure

2002-11-18 Thread Jay Yan






Christian Rose wrote:

  mån 2002-11-18 klockan 14.09 skrev jay.yan:
  
  
http://www.gimp.org/devel_cvs.html  tells me that  I can get the latest 
code from cvs server via:  cvs -z3 co gimp

and also it says:
"There are also several branches in the GIMP cvs tree: the main or HEAD 
branch is GIMP 1.3 (the development version)".

Then I tried cvs -z3 co -r gimp-1-3 gimp, of course I failed, it said: 
"no such tag gimp-1-3"

  
  
Yes, that's correct. There's no "gimp-1-3" branch. As the page says, the
"HEAD" branch is for GIMP 1.3 development. The HEAD branch is what you
get if you just use "cvs -z3 co gimp".
  

Thanks, Christian.

Are there branchs for gimp-1.3.9, gimp-1.3.10?  if there are not, how does
gimp release? from head branch?

Regards

Jay




Re: [Gimp-developer] questions about the cvs structure

2002-11-18 Thread Christian Rose
mån 2002-11-18 klockan 14.09 skrev jay.yan:
> http://www.gimp.org/devel_cvs.html  tells me that  I can get the latest 
> code from cvs server via:  cvs -z3 co gimp
> 
> and also it says:
> "There are also several branches in the GIMP cvs tree: the main or HEAD 
> branch is GIMP 1.3 (the development version)".
> 
> Then I tried cvs -z3 co -r gimp-1-3 gimp, of course I failed, it said: 
> "no such tag gimp-1-3"

Yes, that's correct. There's no "gimp-1-3" branch. As the page says, the
"HEAD" branch is for GIMP 1.3 development. The HEAD branch is what you
get if you just use "cvs -z3 co gimp".


Christian


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.3.10

2002-11-18 Thread sven
Hi,

Robin Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have been trying to see how this gimp works but I am unable to load 
> any images.  All the ones I have say "Image resolution out of bounds 
> using default resolution instead."  I have tried this with png, gif, 
> jpg, and tif but all have the same results.  I am able to open all of 
> these with the current stable gimp without errors.

you most probably hit a compiler bug, see

  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85249


Salut, Sven

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.3.10

2002-11-18 Thread David Neary
Robin Cook wrote:
> I have been trying to see how this gimp works but I am unable to load 
> any images.  All the ones I have say "Image resolution out of bounds 
> using default resolution instead."  I have tried this with png, gif, 
> jpg, and tif but all have the same results.  I am able to open all of 
> these with the current stable gimp without errors.

This is swiftly becoming the #1 FAQ for the development series.
Short answer: Turn off optimisations. Long answer:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85249

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
   David Neary,
Marseille, France
  E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer