[Gimp-developer] my plugin not works now!!

2007-03-28 Thread coolhand

I'm developing a new plugin for gimp that works in the 2.2 series, but not in
2.3.10. It shows the menu entry in gray, but there aren't any messages in
the console about.

In the other hand, i have other plugin that works fine. In this case, is a
load image plugin, but shows in console:
GIMP: save handler plugin-lct-load does not take the standard save
handler args, when i use the standard load args.

thanks.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/my-plugin-not-works-now%21%21-tf3472129.html#a9689522
Sent from the Gimp Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] my plugin not works now!!

2007-03-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 03:08 -0700, coolhand wrote:
 I'm developing a new plugin for gimp that works in the 2.2 series, but not in
 2.3.10. It shows the menu entry in gray, but there aren't any messages in
 the console about.
 
 In the other hand, i have other plugin that works fine. In this case, is a
 load image plugin, but shows in console:
 GIMP: save handler plugin-lct-load does not take the standard save
 handler args, when i use the standard load args.

You would have to show us the code of your plug-in if you want us to
help you.


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] [Gimp-Developer] One-click binary downloads via the gimp website

2007-03-28 Thread David Marrs
Dear all,

It was suggested on the gimp-web mailing list that we could provide direct 
links 
to binary packages for popular platforms such as Windows or Mac, based on user 
agent detection. The link would be provide from the home page - see 
http://next.gimp.org/ for a taster. I liked the proposal (presuming reliable 
packages for 2.4 are made available) and can provide the necessary code.

Sven indicated that this idea has already been considered and rejected by the 
team and that I should bring it up for discussion here before proceeding any 
further.

My argument for including one-click downloads would be ease-of-use primarily 
for 
Mac and Windows users; I don't see the benefit for Linux users as we would 
probably want to install stable Gimp through our package managers.

Please note that the proposal is not necessarily for hosting binaries on the 
gimp website but for providing deep links to the binaries from the website.

If anyone has any issues with this proposal please raise them here. If I don't 
get any replies to this post I'll presume there are no objections. :)

Regards,
David Marrs
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gimp-Developer] One-click binary downloads via the gimp website

2007-03-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 00:29 +0100, David Marrs wrote:

 Sven indicated that this idea has already been considered and rejected by the 
 team and that I should bring it up for discussion here before proceeding any 
 further.

We haven't really discussed and rejected this particular idea. The point
here is just that the current rule is that the GIMP team only provides
the source code. The creation, distribution and maintainance of binary
packages has been left to other parties. The current website tries to
explain this point and only gives recommendations for binary packages.

In my opinion we should stick to this rule. It would make a lot of sense
to make it easier for the user to locate our recommendations for binary
packages. If user agent detection helps to remove one or two clicks,
then I am fine with that. But if there's a download button on the
front-page that directly instantiates the download, then we are
effectively providing binary packages. It doesn't matter if the packages
are hosted elsewhere. To the user it will appear as if we would provide
the binaries.

If we decided that we want to do this, then we should probably really
provide the binaries and we would have to move things like the Win32
user FAQ (http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/faq.html) and the gimp-app
bug-tracker (http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimp-app) to gimp.org and
to our bug-tracker. I don't think we are prepared to do that.


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer