Re: [Gimp-user] New error with 2.3.11 and 2.3.10

2006-11-03 Thread Stephan Hegel
Sven Neumann wrote:

> Why don't you just pass --enable-binreloc to configure and simply call
> the resulting binary directly? It will then figure out where to find the
> libraries and data files relative to the location of the binary.
Thanks for this hint. Meanwhile I've solved the problem as described in
an earlier posting, even without a wrapper.

However, I will remember this option when I run in trouble again ...

Kind regards,
  Stephan.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] gimp-app on the mac does not want to work with my X11

2006-11-03 Thread Chris Mohler

Are you *sure* you're running X11?

IIRC, It was on the developer tools CD in Jaguar.  It's also a free
download from the Apple Dev site.  On my machine, it's under
Applications>Utilities>X11, and has to be running before I launch any
X apps.

Chris
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] New error with 2.3.11 and 2.3.10

2006-11-03 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 03:41 +0100, Stephan Hegel wrote:


> It does not break the mechanism of "configure && make && make install" as
> everything could be embedded fully transparent within this procedure,
> even the installation of a wrapper. The user even wouldn't notice.

This discussion is pretty much pointless to have. The development
releases are there to test the upcoming stable 2.4 release. We are not
going to introduce the possibility that problems with our build system
are show up when such a wrapper script is removed for the final 2.4.0
release.

Why don't you just pass --enable-binreloc to configure and simply call
the resulting binary directly? It will then figure out where to find the
libraries and data files relative to the location of the binary.


Sven


___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] gimp-app on the mac does not want to work with my X11

2006-11-03 Thread ROGER DEBRY
I don't see a mailing list for gimp on the mac, so I hope that this post
is okay. I just downloaded the gimp-app package for the mac by Aaron
Voisine.  When I start the Gimp, I get a dialogue box for XDarwin asking
me if I want full screen or rootless. When I respond (doesn't matter
which), I get a gimp error message  that says

 Missing X11
 Gimp.app requires X11 from the "Optional Installs Package on
the OXS-X install disk.

Can't figure this one out, since X11 clearly seems to be there and
running!
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Opening PDF and PS files

2006-11-03 Thread Øyvind Kolås

On 11/3/06, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Do you look at the image at a zoom level of 100%?
> Yes, you are correct - when I zoom to 100%, the fonts are smooth - now I
how it should be rendered when you zoom in or out. Gimp renders the document
at a given scale, and does not re-render it at any time -- it's not a
vector-based viewer but an pixel-based image editor.


GIMPs failure to display the image smoothly is because it takes a
shortcut when zooming out of an image, it just uses one of the values
from one of the image pixels occupying a single display pixel instead
of averaging all that are contributing.
This has been done for speed/ease of implementation, at some point in
the future this will change.

/Øyvind K.
--
«The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed»
-- William Gibson
http://pippin.gimp.org/http://ffii.org/
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Re: Problems with Gimp on OSX Intel-based

2006-11-03 Thread Curtis Vaughan
The following solution was sent to me personally:

Hey... I would have posted to the list but I'm not a member. I had the
EXACT same problem you are experiencing with Gimp. Try getting rid of
.fonts.cache-1 in your home directory and restart Gimp -- fixed my problem!



On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:14:18 +, Curtis Vaughan wrote:

> I was noticing problems with color on my system. I also noticed that although 
> I
> had 2.2.x installed the current version was 2.2.11. Unfortunately, I didn't 
> pay
> attention to whether I was upgrading or not. Maybe they were the same.
> 
> Anyhow, I installed 2.2.11 and now the problem is that instead of any fonts
> appearing (anywhere in Gimp), all I have are like dominoes. So where it should
> say "File" in the mail window, I see something like 4 dominoes in a row. The
> languages on my system are English, Russian and French (in that order). 
> However,
> the region is set a Russia. I think it's the Russian that's messing it up, but
> am not certain. 
> 
> I'd really appreciate any help.
> 
> BTW, I am talking about Gimp.app and not Gimp through Fink.
> 
> Curtis Vaughan


___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] New error with 2.3.11 and 2.3.10

2006-11-03 Thread John R. Culleton
On Thursday 02 November 2006 09:16, Stephan Hegel wrote:
> Tom Williams wrote:
> > For the record folks,  I've got Gimp 2.2.11 installed in /usr (came with
> > my Linux distro) and Gimp 2.3.12 (used to have 2.3.11) installed in
> > /usr/local/gimp-2.3 and I'm able to run either version without any
> > problems, errors, or wrapper scripts (unless gimp-2.3 is a wrapper
> > script).
>
> That's very interesting. Could you please post the output of
> echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> and
> file /usr/local/gimp-2.3/bin/gimp-2.3
> ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> I'm wondering how this works with multiple gimp libs.
>
> Kind regards,
>Stephan.
>
> ___
> Gimp-user mailing list
> Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
> https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Happily  I seem to have stumbled into the same situation. I compiled from one 
master partition (Slack 11) and run in an older one.  /usr/local is the same 
in each (same partition linked into the tree.)  Gimp 2.3.12 now runs just 
fine. Why I don't know. It won't run using the master partition in which it 
was compiled. I did have to upgrade glib.

In answer to your questions here are the results:
 echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
(nothing)

file /usr/local/gimp-2.3/bin/gimp-2.3
/usr/local/gimp-2.3/bin/gimp-2.3: cannot open 
`/usr/local/gimp-2.3/bin/gimp-2.3' (No such file or directory)

No wrappers installed. 

Go figure.  Hey, I have a working Gimp of recent vintage. I am not touching a 
thing. And I won't upgrade to Slack 11.x until it has Gimp 2.4.x included. 
Don't mess with success. 

My executable is /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3. It yields two errors on startup:
-
/usr/local/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/poppler: error while loading shared 
libraries: libpoppler-glib.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file 
or directory

(gimp-2.3:2838): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: gimp-2.3: wire_read(): error

but it seems to run OK.   



-- 
John Culleton
Able Indexing and Typesetting
Precision typesetting (tm) at reasonable cost.
Satisfaction guaranteed. 
http://wexfordpress.com

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user