Re: [Gimp-user] gui
On 3/23/06, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rhys Sage wrote: Ok. So Ubuntu is recommended. How about a GUI? I can't say I really care for either KDE or Gnome. I did see one called Athene that looked pretty nice but I don't know what it'd run on. Could it be that the person who's answering you is sending mails in private? From the point of view of the list, only the half of the conversation seems to be getting here. Sorry, that was me. I figured that discussion wasn't particularly relevant to the gimp, so I'd keep it off the list. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Add Glow and Center Layer
On 12/7/05, Myke C. Subs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaron Luptak wrote: look at config.log - it found gimptool this time, but had another error. http://mykec.com/mykec/config.log Looks like you're missing glib.h - on my SuSE system, it's at /opt/gnome/include/glib-2.0/glib.h . I'd guess it's in the glib2-devel package on SuSE. P.S. You replied to me personally and not also to the list. Was that intentional? Nope, as soon as I sent it, I said, 'Did I reply to all?' -a ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Re: gimp on 64 bit OS
I've got a dual opteron 242 setup, and gimp works beautifully. Note, however, that i'm running gentoo, so Gimp has been compiled from scratch with a 64-bit gcc. As for improvements over 32-bit, I can't really say, my best comparison is comparing a 2x1.6gHz 64bit machine to a 1x0.9gHz 32 bit machine, so no real basis for comparison. Also, I don't know if any of the filters in GIMP have been optimized with hand-written assembly, or if they are straight c/c++/whatever. If they're assembly, they may actually run slower as-is on amd64 than x86 (this has been the case with several media (de|en)coders), but that will change when someone writes an amd64 assembly version. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Gimp/ImageMagick Transparency Problems
I've got a problem with Gimp 2.0.6 reading some images: (Using ImageMagick 6.1.6...) I took jpgs from a digital camera. Converted them ($convert filname.jpg filename.png) to png rotated some of them 90 degrees cw or ccw (using mogrify) the images load ok in most programs (xzgv, xscreensaver), but whenever I load one of the images that was rotated in the Gimp, it shows up completely transparent (but rotated). Any ideas? I've tried converting the png's to another format (tiff) but no luck there... Editing the original JPGs isn't an option as I don't have them anymore. Thanks Aaron ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp/ImageMagick Transparency Problems
Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, Aaron Luptak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've got a problem with Gimp 2.0.6 reading some images: (Using ImageMagick 6.1.6...) I took jpgs from a digital camera. Converted them ($convert filname.jpg filename.png) to png rotated some of them 90 degrees cw or ccw (using mogrify) the images load ok in most programs (xzgv, xscreensaver), but whenever I load one of the images that was rotated in the Gimp, it shows up completely transparent (but rotated). Any ideas? Could you put one of these PNGs file online so that we could have a look? Sven Warning, these are large, 4-6MB! Converted, unrotated image (ie. opens fine in gimp): http://asuaf.org/~ajl/gimp/p1010001.png Converted, rotated image (ie. shows only transparency in gimp): http://asuaf.org/~ajl/gimp/p1010003r.png Thanks Aaron ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
