[Gimp-user] Working with imported images and layers

2011-07-31 Thread Fred J
This, besides the text tool, is probably one of the most unintuitive 
features in Gimp.


- Find an image on Google / hard drive.
- Drop it into your working area.
- Change it's transparency.
- Resize / Rotate and, suddenly, the transparency reverts to original 
state.


This last step makes no sense.  I changed its transparency for a reason 
and it must stay that way until I say so.  A similar scenario is if I 
have that image on a layer that is below other layers.  The moment I 
resize or rotate, it suddenly appears above all the layers, making 
editing incredibly unintuitive and inaccurate.


Will this be improved upon in the next Gimp?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Working with imported images and layers

2011-07-31 Thread David Gowers (kampu)
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Fred J fokju...@gmail.com wrote:

 **
 This, besides the text tool, is probably one of the most unintuitive
 features in Gimp.

 - Find an image on Google / hard drive.
 - Drop it into your working area.
 - Change it's transparency.
 - Resize / Rotate and, suddenly, the transparency reverts to original
 state.

 This last step makes no sense.  I changed its transparency for a reason and
 it must stay that way until I say so.


And it does stay that way. Currently, we have an opacity control in the
transform dialog. This defaults to 100% IIRC. It only effects the *display*
during transform. The opacity setting of the layer is unaffected, it's
simply not in operation during that time.

(There are various logical problems with using the layer's opacity during
transforms... eg, transforming part of a layer - overlapping parts are
inaccurate, and non-overlapping parts may be inaccurate if the layer has no
alpha channel. Same applies to transforming a whole layer.. because the
original is not, and must not be, hidden during the transform, inheriting
the layer opacity causes problems with the accuracy of the display)
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Working with imported images and layers

2011-07-31 Thread Fred J
Try the same function in Photoshop and you'll see that it is not 
inaccurate.  If you put a layer below other layers, and then work on 
them, there is no reason why it should suddenly display above all the 
layers, at full opacity.  How I am supposed to see behind it?  If I 
wanted it in front of the other layers, then I'd put it above the other 
layers.  It needn't be displayed in front of / above the layers behind / 
below which I've placed it.


This makes for very inaccurate graphic design, and a lot more inaccurate 
than what you're describing.


On 31/07/2011 17:13, David Gowers (kampu) wrote:



On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Fred J fokju...@gmail.com 
mailto:fokju...@gmail.com wrote:


This, besides the text tool, is probably one of the most
unintuitive features in Gimp.

- Find an image on Google / hard drive.
- Drop it into your working area.
- Change it's transparency.
- Resize / Rotate and, suddenly, the transparency reverts to
original state.

This last step makes no sense.  I changed its transparency for a
reason and it must stay that way until I say so.


And it does stay that way. Currently, we have an opacity control in 
the transform dialog. This defaults to 100% IIRC. It only effects the 
*display* during transform. The opacity setting of the layer is 
unaffected, it's simply not in operation during that time.


(There are various logical problems with using the layer's opacity 
during transforms... eg, transforming part of a layer - overlapping 
parts are inaccurate, and non-overlapping parts may be inaccurate if 
the layer has no alpha channel. Same applies to transforming a whole 
layer.. because the original is not, and must not be, hidden during 
the transform, inheriting the layer opacity causes problems with the 
accuracy of the display)



___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Working with imported images and layers

2011-07-31 Thread Fred J

   This defaults to 100% IIRC. It only effects the *display* during
   transform.

This is the time when it shouldn't display at 100%.

Let's say I have a bunch of layers with various graphical elements.  The 
one at the bottom is a photo that needs to be scaled up and rotated, so 
that it fits in better with the layers above it.  The moment I attempt 
that, I am no longer able to see my layers because the photo layer is 
now displaying above everything.  What now?  It becomes hit-and-miss 
guesswork, which is counter intuitive.


On 31/07/2011 17:13, David Gowers (kampu) wrote:



On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Fred J fokju...@gmail.com 
mailto:fokju...@gmail.com wrote:


This, besides the text tool, is probably one of the most
unintuitive features in Gimp.

- Find an image on Google / hard drive.
- Drop it into your working area.
- Change it's transparency.
- Resize / Rotate and, suddenly, the transparency reverts to
original state.

This last step makes no sense.  I changed its transparency for a
reason and it must stay that way until I say so.


And it does stay that way. Currently, we have an opacity control in 
the transform dialog. This defaults to 100% IIRC. It only effects the 
*display* during transform. The opacity setting of the layer is 
unaffected, it's simply not in operation during that time.


(There are various logical problems with using the layer's opacity 
during transforms... eg, transforming part of a layer - overlapping 
parts are inaccurate, and non-overlapping parts may be inaccurate if 
the layer has no alpha channel. Same applies to transforming a whole 
layer.. because the original is not, and must not be, hidden during 
the transform, inheriting the layer opacity causes problems with the 
accuracy of the display)



___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Working with imported images and layers

2011-07-31 Thread Ofnuts

On 07/31/2011 05:32 PM, Fred J wrote:


This defaults to 100% IIRC. It only effects the *display* during
transform.

This is the time when it shouldn't display at 100%.

Let's say I have a bunch of layers with various graphical elements.  
The one at the bottom is a photo that needs to be scaled up and 
rotated, so that it fits in better with the layers above it.  The 
moment I attempt that, I am no longer able to see my layers because 
the photo layer is now displaying above everything.  What now?  It 
becomes hit-and-miss guesswork, which is counter intuitive.




That's why there is an opacity control in the layer transform tools 
(rotate/scale/shear/perpective) and why it applies only during the 
transform.


Btw if you are trying to move two layers to makje them match, there is 
an exact-aligner' plugin which does everything in one transform (avoids 
blurriness). You pick two points on one layer, two points on the other, 
and it figures out the scale/rotation/offset to apply to the second to 
make the pair of points match:


http://registry.gimp.org/node/18961


___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user