[Gimp-user] gimp slider signal
Hello, I have a question about gimp slider. Currently, I send off a signal at every value change. However, I would like to send a signal from the slider only when I release the mouse click. Could anyone tell me a signal to put as argument to g_signal_connect for the slider? Thanks, G. L. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp slider signal
Eventually you will get to gimp-developer gimp-developer-l...@gnome.org which is the right mailing list for such questions :) Alexandre On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Yeon Jin (Grace) Lee yeongrace@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a question about gimp slider. Currently, I send off a signal at every value change. However, I would like to send a signal from the slider only when I release the mouse click. Could anyone tell me a signal to put as argument to g_signal_connect for the slider? Thanks, G. L. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list -- Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Short cut [ and ]
Dear developers, There is short cut missing in the new version 6.2.12 In version 2.6.11 you can change the scale of brushes by using ] to enlarge or [ decrease the size of the brush. It would be nice if this came back in the next version therefore I turn back to version 6.2.11. It's a very handy tool. However I look forward to the new version 2.8 the developers did a very good job. The link http://libregraphicsworld.org/blog/entry/what-hasnt-happened-to-gimp-2.8 impressed me for the new appications. Many thanks for this. Regards Theo -- TheoN (via gimpusers.com) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Short cut [ and ]
On 02/18/2012 08:29 AM, TheoN wrote: Dear developers, There is short cut missing in the new version 6.2.12 In version 2.6.11 you can change the scale of brushes by using ] to enlarge or [ decrease the size of the brush. It would be nice if this came back in the next version therefore I turn back to version 6.2.11. It's a very handy tool. However I look forward to the new version 2.8 the developers did a very good job. The link http://libregraphicsworld.org/blog/entry/what-hasnt-happened-to-gimp-2.8 impressed me for the new appications. Hey Theo, I don't know if this is relevant to your use case, but one of my favorite should be a default features is the ability to use the normally unassigned alt + mouse wheel combination to scale brushes. Since [ and ] are usually right-handed gestures, most users will like not having to let go of their mouse to change their brush size. Configuration, illustrated: http://pilobilus.net/img/mouse-scale-brush.jpg :o) Steve Thanks a lot Steve, I have installed the version 6.2.12 again installed over the previous version and now the short key [ and ] does work again. I don't know the reason for this, but every thing it’s OK now. The illustration of the mouse in combination is a different content in my Dutch version, but I see this can be modified. It's very useful. Best regards Theo -- TheoN (via gimpusers.com) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Web development question?
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Kevin Cozens ke...@ve3syb.ca wrote: If you are using some fancy features on a web page it may not be as easy to have the same level of compatability across multiple browsers on multiple operating systems without some conditional code but the amount of browser specific checks should be kept to a minimum. Right, it's not like these new-fangled standards like HTML5 can possibly have any positive effect on a user's experience. Let's all cripple our work in an effort to support old, unmaintained, insecure browsers. In fact, we should ENCOURAGE users to continue using old, unmaintained, insecure browsers. It's the only responsible thing to do. Good plan! New, interactive features? Who needs 'em?!? /sarcasm -- Frank Gore THE place to talk photography! www.FriendlyPhotoZone.com ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Web development question?
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Frank Gore wrote: Right, it's not like these new-fangled standards like HTML5 can possibly have any positive effect on a user's experience. Let's all cripple our work in an effort to support old, unmaintained, insecure browsers. In fact, we should ENCOURAGE users to continue using old, unmaintained, insecure browsers. It's the only responsible thing to do. Are you by any chance referring to five kinds of CSS3 gradients that have to be put to a styles file so that it's supported across browsers for sure? ;-) Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Web development question?
On 02/18/2012 04:16 PM, Kevin Cozens wrote: On 12-02-16 06:20 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: Usage is down to something around 5% on most sites I have seen recent statistics for. Considering the security aspect, it's really not doing anyone a favor to support IE6 any more... But the moment I stop writing alternate style sheets for it, If you were a supporter of the Any Browser Campaign (http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/) you shouldn't have to write alternate style sheets. When I did a redesign of my website several years ago I tested my pages using Netscape 7.2 and 8, FireFox 1.5 and 2.0, Opera 9, Blazer 4.0 (the browser on my PDA), and even Internet Explorer 5.5 and 6. The different browsers showed some errors in the layout. I was able to fix all the issues after some adjustments to the style sheets. The pages then looked the same (except due to minor variation in fonts available to the web browser) without any checks anywhere that looked for a specific browser. If you are using some fancy features on a web page it may not be as easy to have the same level of compatability across multiple browsers on multiple operating systems without some conditional code but the amount of browser specific checks should be kept to a minimum. Actually I use semantic markup via standards compliant xhmtl 1.0 and CSS 2.1. As an example, the pages in my silly little personal site look and work the same in Firefox, Opera, Chrome, Safari, Epiphany, Konqueror, Midori and IE8. I did not have to tweak anything to accomplish that level of cross browser compatibility - that's what W3C Standards are for and, thank God, Microsoft has finally capitulated and the browser wars are over. I use a few alternate CSS declarations in an auxiliary style sheet to correct rendering errors in IE6, because some people are still using it, and the way IE6 is broken affects the main navigation menu. Those are the only IE6 errors I bother to correct. Visitors to the site who are using IE6 or 7 are greeted by a security warning and upgrade link on every page, wrapped in a conditional comment whose contents are only visible on the offending browsers. :o) Steve ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Web development question?
On 02/18/2012 04:01 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: Actually I use semantic markup via standards compliant xhmtl 1.0 and CSS 2.1. As an example, the pages in my silly little personal site look and work the same in Firefox, Opera, Chrome, Safari, Epiphany, Konqueror, Midori and IE8. I did not have to tweak anything to accomplish that level of cross browser compatibility - that's what W3C Standards are for and, thank God, Microsoft has finally capitulated and the browser wars are over. I use a few alternate CSS declarations in an auxiliary style sheet to correct rendering errors in IE6, because some people are still using it, and the way IE6 is broken affects the main navigation menu. Those are the only IE6 errors I bother to correct. Visitors to the site who are using IE6 or 7 are greeted by a security warning and upgrade link on every page, wrapped in a conditional comment whose contents are only visible on the offending browsers. :o) Elegant, Steve - Thanks for the suggestion, and also for promoting W3C awareness. -- Burnie ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Saving file as a PDF?
Is it possible to save files as PDF like photoshop? -- lckrkrzypatch (via gimpusers.com) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Saving file as a PDF?
* lckrkrzypatch for...@gimpusers.com [02-18-12 22:05]: Is it possible to save files as PDF like photoshop? should not be too difficult to access the File menu and select Save As and see what formats are available. But I cannot answer about like photoshop, have never used it and do not own an operating system which will support it. I would rather spend the $600 for glass for my cameras. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Saving file as a PDF?
Is it possible to save files as PDF like photoshop? I can't speak for 2.6 but the 2.7 version allows you to export to pdf -- Owen ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Saving file as a PDF?
On 02/18/2012 10:02 PM, lckrkrzypatch wrote: Is it possible to save files as PDF like photoshop? Probably not like Photoshop but here are two ways: 1. Easy as in simple: Save your image as a .ps file. (That's postscript.) Then convert the .ps file to .pdf via the ps2pdf terminal command, i.e.: ps2pdf example.ps example.pdf ps2pdf is part of the GhostScript package, versions should be available for most operating systems. 2. Easy as in all-gui on Windows: Install PDFCreator, and print your image to PDF - this will appear as an option when you select a printer from the ones installed on the system. I believe MAC systems can natively print to PDF, but don't quote me on that. :o) Steve ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Saving file as a PDF?
On 02/18/2012 10:41 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: On 02/18/2012 10:02 PM, lckrkrzypatch wrote: Is it possible to save files as PDF like photoshop? Probably not like Photoshop but here are two ways: 1. Easy as in simple: Save your image as a .ps file. (That's postscript.) Then convert the .ps file to .pdf via the ps2pdf terminal command, i.e.: ps2pdf example.ps example.pdf ps2pdf is part of the GhostScript package, versions should be available for most operating systems. Um, on second thought, I have been playing with this and it is giving me cat fits. The GIMP's Postscript files are fine, but apparently ps2pdf, at least the version installed on my system, does not like arbitrary dimensions, and gives me an image cropped as IT dang well pleases as a pdf output. So, here's another e-z gui option, probably better than any I suggested earlier: Save your image as a .png file. Open it with Inkscape, making sure the embed option is selected. Do a Save As, select the PDF format, name the output file with the correct extension, and hit the go button. This should work on all platforms. If it does not, make sure you have GhostScript installed - you also need it to import .pdf files to the GIMP. If you do not already have Inkscape, congratulations, now you can play with vector files! Don't miss Inkscape's File Import from Open Clip Art Library command - tons of free images that are flexible and adaptable in every sense of the word. :o) Steve ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
