Re: [Gimp-user] Fwd: Buttons are blurry
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:06:39 +0300 Ilya Novikov via gimp-user-list wrote: > Hello all, > > Just want to ask - does anyone on gimp 2.10.22 (macos) also have > blurry buttons like in the screenshot - > https://yadi.sk/i/hgSg0cf3EZX58Q > > They look almost the same despite the used theme. I think you are seeing the 'new' icons which appear now. They are more 'stylized' from the icons from previous GIMP versions. In my eyes not an improvement, but I guess that's a personal matter. Also, I think they are meant to indicate that they have sub-menus to select the actual function you need by right-clicking (notice there are less icons than before?). John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp users matter
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:13:00 +0100 Wolfgang Hugemann a...@hugemann.de wrote: Perhaps it would suffice to turn special warning messages permanently off, something like a checkbox in the warning dialog: Don't show this message again. This is rather common in modern programs and would make live somewhat easier. I already re-defined CTRL-S to export, but still I have to click the warning message each time when I close an image. Hi Wolfgang, http://www.shallowsky.com/software/gimp-save/ This plugin provides a new 'file command' for the GIMP, which exports, and also marks the file as clean, so the confirmation does not appear anymore. It was posted by Akkana on this list a long time ago. John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp users matter
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 11:07:55 -0700 John Meyer johnme...@pueblocomputing.com wrote: Infrequent user of GIMP, but I'll ask: is there no way to map the control keys differently? Yes you can reassign the control keys. But that doesn't completely solve the inconvenience. Ypu still have to confirm losing info on exiting GIMP. There is also a plugin (from Akasha?) which is slightly better than reassigning, but introduced another problem (I seem to recall). John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Monochrome 1-bit export?
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:26:33 +0200 (CEST) oli...@des-or-mad.net wrote: I achieve good results using ImageMagick convert with the monochrome option: convert -monochrome input.png output.pcx Hi Oliver. -monochrome alone didn't do it. Adding -depth 1 neither, -color 2 neither. After quite a bit of experimenting I did find a combination which produced the correct colors and resolution: convert fk4.pcx -colors 2 -type bilevel -density 72x72 fk4a.pcx (-monochrome did produce something: it separated the original into three color planes, each 8-bit) A pity Gimp doesn't offer a dialog at the export, which offers 1-bit PCX output, instead of insisting on 8-bit, even if the image is marked as indexed B/W) John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] (no subject)
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Red Green redgreen...@yahoo.com wrote: unsubscribe But it's not Yahoo's fault you didn't send the 'unsubscribe' to the correct address. Connect to the site at the bottom of this mail to unsubscribe. John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] DON'T HATE the new save vs. export behavior
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 22:34:53 +0200 Johannes anonfo...@gmx.org wrote: But I guess the old ladies wouldn't find the opt-out switch for this behavior in the GIMP preferences, if there was any. So you could still be relaxed and happy. Not entirely sure. I'm guessing a frequent action on a computer (windooze or linux) is editing a picture from a camera (jpg) and sending it along. So, with Gimp 2.8, those old ladies will end up with a bunch of .xcfs which they won't be able to pass on to other, non-gimp users. So, they'll have to learn how to export to .jpg, which seems an extra complication. John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Why I went back from GIMP 2.8 to 2.6.x
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 19:19:13 +0400 Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote: Stats that there have been hundreds of mails? That most people who like it have nothing much to say about it? Do _you_ have stats that prove the opposite? :) No Alexandre... This was a serious question. It's easy to say 'there is a silent majority who says...'. I can always say 'I changed this, and almost everyone is fine with it' because I don't get any feedback. Why not do a _real_ poll on the opinion of the users re: the new 'save feature'? John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] What HAVE I done??
On Mon, 28 May 2012 15:55:46 -0400 Allan Topp ad...@ncf.ca wrote: I have been blissfully GIMPing away ... and all of a sudden when I try to delete/erase/make transparent a selection it instead fills the selection with the foreground colour. Anyone have idea what I've done and how to fix it? TIA Ctrl-Z comes to mind... I suspect you are in an image mode without transparency (alpha) layer. Add it and cutouts should be transparent. John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
On Sun, 06 May 2012 23:24:04 -0400 Steve Kinney ad...@pilobilus.net wrote: On 05/06/2012 10:51 PM, John Coppens wrote: -When starting to edit, why not immediately do a Save as xxx.xcf? That's what I do and it has come in very handy. -Why not add (to Gimp) the possibility to maintain an autosave copy in (.XCF format) each N minutes? And not delete it for X days? I would not use that. For instance, just a couple of minutes ago I opened an XCF file, merged several layers for convenient export of some image elements to another XCF file, and closed the file without saving. If an autosave hit in the middle of that, it would commit this strictly temporary state to my source file, wiping out layers I need to keep if I closed the file - or somebody tripped over the power cord - before reverting the changes. As 'GSR' also commented there are quite a few ways to avoid this problem. The autosave could save a copy with the same name in a temp directory, or add hashes (#yourfile.xcf#) or any other idea. -Why not make the Undo buffer for the last N edited images persistent for X days? Disk space is generally not an issue. That's an interesting idea. Over the years I have heard a lot people wishing out loud that they could undo changes in a saved image after closing out. Still though, there have been times when I had to repeatedly flush the undo buffer when using an older/slower machine to work on big files - a day's work could add up to gigabytes of saved buffer in some instances... No doubt. Not unlike the cache of a browser... It's scary how much info gets saved in a machine, mostly never to be used again. But still, gigabytes are getting cheaper by the minute. Where's the time I my first harddisk was 20-odd MB ;-) John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
On Sat, 5 May 2012 12:32:22 +0400 Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure what this question means. The question should be understood literally :) Is GIMP the only tool to get your job done? I wrote a couple of macros in Guile which help me, so Gimp is my preferred tool, yes. Say 95% of bitmap editing is done in Gimp. For vector work, I use Inkscape (which, BTW, has a very convoluted file file flow). We don't know if you need this unsafe workflow all the time or half the time. I'm not sure what's unsafe. Losing multiple layers, masks, extra channels etc. is unsafe. Options for people who loose Y hours of work by slips of fingers: -When starting to edit, why not immediately do a Save as xxx.xcf? -Why not add (to Gimp) the possibility to maintain an autosave copy in (.XCF format) each N minutes? And not delete it for X days? -Why not make the Undo buffer for the last N edited images persistent for X days? Disk space is generally not an issue. John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] How can I create huge billboard sized files in super high dpi?
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:29:31 -0300 Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@mpc.com.br wrote: Where did you get the 12 multiplying in there? 1 yard = 3 foot 1 foot = 12 inches I'm a metric man, but I seem to remember this... John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] How can I create huge billboard sized files in super high dpi?
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:44:39 -0400 Tara Gover taraje...@mail.com wrote: Just today, I installed the latest GIMP, and it doesn't seem to be letting me create even a 58x72 inch image in 1440 dpi. Is there an add on or a way that I can create huge tiff files in GIMP?.or do I have to shell out the cash and get Creative Suite? 58 x (88 x 3 x 12) = 183744 square inches, at 1440 dpi would mean something like 183000 * 1440 * 1440 * 3 = 1143034675200 bytes. That's 1143 GB - entirely unpractical. I don't think even super hi res for posters really means 1440 dpi (unless the image is scaled). Anyway - I suspect you will want to look at vector images instead of bitmaps. (or panelling) John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Photoshop vs Gimp for mobile dev?
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:55:21 -0800 Ronald F. Guilmette r...@tristatelogic.com wrote: The bad news? Of course, it is only available for Windoze and Mac. :-( Oh well. Better than nothing if I can't get Gimp+DCRaw+UFRaw to work for any reason. Did you check digikam? http://www.barrypearson.co.uk/articles/dng/products_y7.htm Exceptionally, this product is also listed below as a raw converter, (but only counts once towards the total of products that support DNG). It is the first DNG Converter that runs native on Linux. (It also runs on Windows and MacOS-X). John ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
