Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes: I was thinking that you would be self-contained inside the contrib/mw-to-git directory, and therefore you would have to teach your code how to install the Git module, and you could not longer just cp git-remote-mediawiki into the right place to install it. But I think we have already crossed that bridge somewhat with Git.pm. And if you add your module as perl/Git/MediaWiki.pm and use the existing perl build system, then it is not any extra effort from the build system. I'm not sure having perl/Git/MediaWiki.pm would be a good idea: this MediaWiki.pm would be really a mediawiki thing more than a Git thing, so the Git main tree probably want to stay away from it and keep it in contrib. But you should be able to use contrib/mw-to-git/perl/GitMediawiki.pm or something like that and chain to ../../perl/Makefile in contrib/mw-to-git/Makefile. Also, for now, git-remote-mediawiki works only after you run make install in Git's toplevel. I think that's ok, but it would be weird to be able to use/test git-remote-mediawiki only after doing a make install to deploy the new mediawiki Perl module. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 08:55:12AM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: But I think we have already crossed that bridge somewhat with Git.pm. And if you add your module as perl/Git/MediaWiki.pm and use the existing perl build system, then it is not any extra effort from the build system. I'm not sure having perl/Git/MediaWiki.pm would be a good idea: this MediaWiki.pm would be really a mediawiki thing more than a Git thing, so the Git main tree probably want to stay away from it and keep it in contrib. Yes, it's ugly. It means that the mediawiki stuff creeps out of contrib and into the main tree; and worse, as part of a public API that gets installed. We'd have to be a lot more picky about the interface and the code quality. But you should be able to use contrib/mw-to-git/perl/GitMediawiki.pm or something like that and chain to ../../perl/Makefile in contrib/mw-to-git/Makefile. That might work. Most of the magic in perl/Makefile happens in the perl-generated MakeMaker bits, though, so it may not be that easy. I haven't looked. Also, for now, git-remote-mediawiki works only after you run make install in Git's toplevel. I think that's ok, but it would be weird to be able to use/test git-remote-mediawiki only after doing a make install to deploy the new mediawiki Perl module. Good point. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
The V2 is on the launchpad but I am still struggling with the code factoring between git-mw.perl and git-remote-mediawiki.perl :/ . On 9 June 2013 08:08, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote: You could make a Git::MediaWiki.pm module, but installing that would significantly complicate the build procedure, and potentially be annoying for users. One trick I have done in the past is to concatenate bits of perl script together in the Makefile, like this: foo: common.pl foo.pl { \ echo '$(PERL_PATH_SQ)' \ for i in $^; do \ echo #line 1 $src \ cat $src \ done \ } $@+ mv $@+ $@ That would conflict a bit with the way we chain to git's Makefile, though. I suspect you could do something complicated like build foo.pl from common.pl and foo-main.pl, then chain to git's Makefile to build foo from foo.pl. I've implemented this one for now but after a real-life meeting with Matthieu Moy we discussed the possibility to build a GitMediawiki.pm module. It seems more clean than the concatenation of perl scripts. Plus, it would force people to limit side effects inside the functions used in this package/utils file (I have in mind the mw_connect_maybe function here and a couple of others which directly *hope* for global vars to be set to a nice value before being called). What I find bad in the concatenating-thingy is the mandatory rename of git-mw.perl into something like git-mw.unmerged.perl and git-remote-mediawiki.perl into git-remote-mediawiki.unmerged.perl. Otherwise, like you said, it would be hard to chain to git's Makefile after the merge. For now, I have really no idea which one is the best. If I may ask, what did you have in mind while saying: You could make a Git::MediaWiki.pm module, but installing that would significantly complicate the build procedure, and potentially be annoying for users. ? Since my previous commit (ea07ec1 in next - use Git.pm functions for credentials), git-remote-mediawiki.perl already depends on the proper installation of the Git.pm package. In what ways the need for the installation of yet another package (GitMediawiki.pm) would annoy a user ? Thank you for your time, Benoit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:31:31PM +0200, Benoît Person wrote: I've implemented this one for now but after a real-life meeting with Matthieu Moy we discussed the possibility to build a GitMediawiki.pm module. It seems more clean than the concatenation of perl scripts. Plus, it would force people to limit side effects inside the functions used in this package/utils file (I have in mind the mw_connect_maybe function here and a couple of others which directly *hope* for global vars to be set to a nice value before being called). What I find bad in the concatenating-thingy is the mandatory rename of git-mw.perl into something like git-mw.unmerged.perl and git-remote-mediawiki.perl into git-remote-mediawiki.unmerged.perl. Otherwise, like you said, it would be hard to chain to git's Makefile after the merge. Yeah, I agree it's very hacky. For now, I have really no idea which one is the best. If I may ask, what did you have in mind while saying: You could make a Git::MediaWiki.pm module, but installing that would significantly complicate the build procedure, and potentially be annoying for users. Since my previous commit (ea07ec1 in next - use Git.pm functions for credentials), git-remote-mediawiki.perl already depends on the proper installation of the Git.pm package. In what ways the need for the installation of yet another package (GitMediawiki.pm) would annoy a user ? I was thinking that you would be self-contained inside the contrib/mw-to-git directory, and therefore you would have to teach your code how to install the Git module, and you could not longer just cp git-remote-mediawiki into the right place to install it. But I think we have already crossed that bridge somewhat with Git.pm. And if you add your module as perl/Git/MediaWiki.pm and use the existing perl build system, then it is not any extra effort from the build system. That is probably the most sane way to go. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:50:31PM +0200, benoit.per...@ensimag.fr wrote: The #7 issue on git-mediawiki's issue tracker [1] states that the ability to preview content without pushing would be a nice thing to have. Sounds like a useful goal. The default behaviour for the `preview` subcommand is: 1- Find the remote name of the current branch's upstream and check if it's a wiki one with its url (ie: mediawiki://) 2- Parse the content of the local file (given as argument) using the distant wiki's API. Makes sense. 3- Retrieve the current page on the distant mediawiki. 4- Merge those those contents. I'm not sure what these steps are for. You are trying to preview not just your local version, but pulling in any changes that have happened upstream since the work you built on top of? It seems like that is a separate, orthogonal issue, and git would be the right place to do that merge. IOW, as a user, your workflow would be something like: 1. git fetch, pulling down the latest copy from the server 2. make your changes on top 3. use this command to preview your changes 4. use git fetch to check whether anything else happened on the server. a. If not, go ahead and push. b. If upstream changed, use git diff to inspect the changes to the wiki source. Merge or rebase your changes with respect to what's on the server. Goto step 3 to make sure they look good. I also wonder if it would be useful to be able to specify not only files in the filesystem, but also arbitrary blobs. So in 4b above, you could git mw preview origin:page.mw to see the rendered version of what upstream has done. It works but a couple of points trouble me: 1- I had to copy two functions from `git-remote-mediawiki.perl`, I don't really know how we could factorize those things ? I don't think it makes much sense to create a package just for them ? You could make a Git::MediaWiki.pm module, but installing that would significantly complicate the build procedure, and potentially be annoying for users. One trick I have done in the past is to concatenate bits of perl script together in the Makefile, like this: foo: common.pl foo.pl { \ echo '$(PERL_PATH_SQ)' \ for i in $^; do \ echo #line 1 $src \ cat $src \ done \ } $@+ mv $@+ $@ That would conflict a bit with the way we chain to git's Makefile, though. I suspect you could do something complicated like build foo.pl from common.pl and foo-main.pl, then chain to git's Makefile to build foo from foo.pl. 2- The current behavior is to crash if the current branch do not have an upstream branch on a valid mediawiki remote. To find that specific remote, it runs `git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name @{upstream}` which will return something like `/refs/remotes/$remote_name/master`. 2a- maybe there is a better way to find that remote name ? If you just care about the remote name and not the name of the local branch, you can just ask for my $curr_branch = `git symbolic-ref HEAD`; my $remote = `git config branch.$curr_branch.remote`; my $url = `git config remote.$remote.url`; Of course you would want some error checks and probably some chomp()s in there, too. 2b- would it be useful to add a fallback if that search fails ? searching for a valid mediawiki remote url in all the remotes returned by `git remote` for instance ? That is probably OK as long as there is only one such remote, and it would help the case where you have branched off of a local branch (so your upstream remote is .). If there are two mediawiki remotes, though, it would make sense to simply fail, as you don't know which to use. But I'd expect the common case by far to be that you simply have one such remote. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 09:00:30PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: + # Auto-loading in browser + if ($autoload) { + open(my $browser, -|:encoding(UTF-8), xdg-open .$preview_file_name); That could be read from Git's configuration, and default to xdg-open. But you don't want to hardcode it in the middle of the code. In fact, I think we provide the git-web--browse tool for just this purpose. It takes care of the trickiness of looking at the web.browser config, resolving custom browser tools defined by browser.tool.*, and handling backgrounding of the browser (which you want to do for graphical browsers but not for terminal ones). -Peff PS I agreed with all of the other comments in your review. :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes: 1- Find the remote name of the current branch's upstream and check if it's a wiki one with its url (ie: mediawiki://) 2- Parse the content of the local file (given as argument) using the distant wiki's API. Makes sense. 3- Retrieve the current page on the distant mediawiki. 4- Merge those those contents. I'm not sure what these steps are for. You are trying to preview not just your local version, but pulling in any changes that have happened upstream since the work you built on top of? Same question here. I'd expect git mw preview in a mediawiki workflow to do what pdflatex foo evince foo.pdf do in a latex workflow: see in rendered form what I've been doing. In a latex flow, if I want to see how my local changes merge with the remote ones, I do git merge pdflatex, and I'd do the same with git mw. I also wonder if it would be useful to be able to specify not only files in the filesystem, but also arbitrary blobs. So in 4b above, you could git mw preview origin:page.mw to see the rendered version of what upstream has done. Next step could even be git mw diff $from $to, using the wiki to render the diff. Not a priority, but could be funny. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes: Same question here. I'd expect git mw preview in a mediawiki workflow to do what pdflatex foo evince foo.pdf do in a latex workflow: see in rendered form what I've been doing. In a latex flow, if I want to see how my local changes merge with the remote ones, I do git merge pdflatex, and I'd do the same with git mw. In fact, I should not have used merge to describe how the two contents (page template + new parsed content) are combined together. For now, the code simply replaces the template page's text content (the one retrieved from the remote) with the new one. It does not really care if the remote has changes or not. (And, to be honest, I did not thought about that issue ;) ). But, like both of you said : in a typical workflow, the merging would be left to the user so the current behavior is fine I think ? I also wonder if it would be useful to be able to specify not only files in the filesystem, but also arbitrary blobs. So in 4b above, you could git mw preview origin:page.mw to see the rendered version of what upstream has done. Next step could even be git mw diff $from $to, using the wiki to render the diff. Not a priority, but could be funny. I searched in the Mediawiki API if there was a way to diff from a stored revision and raw text content but I've found nothing :/ . We could make a little hack to do that by saving as a new revision the local content, and use the DeleteRevision-thingy from Mediawiki [1] to hide this useless revision but it would floods the remote DB and usually users to not have the permission to use that tool. So, for now I would say it's a no-go :/ . [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:RevisionDelete Benoit Person -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
On 9 June 2013 08:08, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote: I also wonder if it would be useful to be able to specify not only files in the filesystem, but also arbitrary blobs. So in 4b above, you could git mw preview origin:page.mw to see the rendered version of what upstream has done. Hum, so `git mw preview origin:page.mw` would just do the get request to the remote mediawiki, save it locally and - maybe - load it in the browser ? Is it really better than just opening the browser and typing the right URL ? Currently, this URL is one click away when you have preview file loaded in a web browser. It works but a couple of points trouble me: 1- I had to copy two functions from `git-remote-mediawiki.perl`, I don't really know how we could factorize those things ? I don't think it makes much sense to create a package just for them ? You could make a Git::MediaWiki.pm module, but installing that would significantly complicate the build procedure, and potentially be annoying for users. One trick I have done in the past is to concatenate bits of perl script together in the Makefile, like this: foo: common.pl foo.pl { \ echo '$(PERL_PATH_SQ)' \ for i in $^; do \ echo #line 1 $src \ cat $src \ done \ } $@+ mv $@+ $@ That would conflict a bit with the way we chain to git's Makefile, though. I suspect you could do something complicated like build foo.pl from common.pl and foo-main.pl, then chain to git's Makefile to build foo from foo.pl. ok, thanks a lot. 2- The current behavior is to crash if the current branch do not have an upstream branch on a valid mediawiki remote. To find that specific remote, it runs `git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name @{upstream}` which will return something like `/refs/remotes/$remote_name/master`. 2a- maybe there is a better way to find that remote name ? If you just care about the remote name and not the name of the local branch, you can just ask for my $curr_branch = `git symbolic-ref HEAD`; my $remote = `git config branch.$curr_branch.remote`; my $url = `git config remote.$remote.url`; Of course you would want some error checks and probably some chomp()s in there, too. The fact is, `git symbolic-ref HEAD` result would have to be parsed in order to extract the current branch name like I currently extract the remote name. So, is it really better than `git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name @{upstream}` ? 2b- would it be useful to add a fallback if that search fails ? searching for a valid mediawiki remote url in all the remotes returned by `git remote` for instance ? That is probably OK as long as there is only one such remote, and it would help the case where you have branched off of a local branch (so your upstream remote is .). If there are two mediawiki remotes, though, it would make sense to simply fail, as you don't know which to use. But I'd expect the common case by far to be that you simply have one such remote. Well, I thought that `git mw preview` could provide an interactive mode where, if the first search fails, it would find all the mediawiki remotes, and offers to the user a way to choose the remote ? Benoit Person -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
Benoît Person benoit.per...@ensimag.fr writes: On 9 June 2013 08:08, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote: I also wonder if it would be useful to be able to specify not only files in the filesystem, but also arbitrary blobs. So in 4b above, you could git mw preview origin:page.mw to see the rendered version of what upstream has done. Hum, so `git mw preview origin:page.mw` would just do the get request to the remote mediawiki, save it locally and - maybe - load it in the browser ? Is it really better than just opening the browser and typing the right URL ? Currently, this URL is one click away when you have preview file loaded in a web browser. origin:page.mw is not necessarily the best example, but HEAD^:page.mw can exist in your local history and not on the wiki. Even HEAD:page.mw can be interesting if you have uncommited changes. Not that it's terribly useful to be able to preview it, but once you can deal with local files, it should be easy enough to generalize it to any blob. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 01:01:48PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: I also wonder if it would be useful to be able to specify not only files in the filesystem, but also arbitrary blobs. So in 4b above, you could git mw preview origin:page.mw to see the rendered version of what upstream has done. Next step could even be git mw diff $from $to, using the wiki to render the diff. Not a priority, but could be funny. I was actually thinking along the same lines. I often do something similar with Git's documentation. When you are tweaking the formatting or an asciidoc knob, it is useful to diff the rendered output to check that the changes had the effect you wanted. I usually have done so by hand, but I actually wonder if git difftool could be used as a wrapper for this (I suspect not, because you have to deal with the whole build tree, not just individual blobs). -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 02:35:45PM +0200, Benoît Person wrote: On 9 June 2013 08:08, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote: I also wonder if it would be useful to be able to specify not only files in the filesystem, but also arbitrary blobs. So in 4b above, you could git mw preview origin:page.mw to see the rendered version of what upstream has done. Hum, so `git mw preview origin:page.mw` would just do the get request to the remote mediawiki, save it locally and - maybe - load it in the browser ? Is it really better than just opening the browser and typing the right URL ? Not really, but when you start doing origin^:page.mw, it may make more of a difference. If you just care about the remote name and not the name of the local branch, you can just ask for my $curr_branch = `git symbolic-ref HEAD`; my $remote = `git config branch.$curr_branch.remote`; my $url = `git config remote.$remote.url`; Of course you would want some error checks and probably some chomp()s in there, too. The fact is, `git symbolic-ref HEAD` result would have to be parsed in order to extract the current branch name like I currently extract the remote name. So, is it really better than `git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name @{upstream}` ? It is, because it is not strictly true that an upstream of refs/remotes/foo/* is for the remote foo (though in 99% of cases, it is). To find the upstream, git looks at branch.$curr_branch.remote, then calculates the upstream based on the fetch refspecs. Then you try to undo that by converting it back from the right-hand side of the fetch refspec into a remote name. It would be much easier to just look at the config. :) And yes, you do need the short name of the branch from HEAD, not the full refname. You can use git symbolic-ref --short for that. You also should check that it returns something useful (i.e., that we are not on a detached HEAD). That is probably OK as long as there is only one such remote, and it would help the case where you have branched off of a local branch (so your upstream remote is .). If there are two mediawiki remotes, though, it would make sense to simply fail, as you don't know which to use. But I'd expect the common case by far to be that you simply have one such remote. Well, I thought that `git mw preview` could provide an interactive mode where, if the first search fails, it would find all the mediawiki remotes, and offers to the user a way to choose the remote ? That's fine; just as long as we do not silently produce output from an unknown source when there is ambiguity. You can do an interactive selection, or even just say something like: There are multiple mediawiki remotes, and I do not know which one you want to use for your preview. Which of: remote1 remote2 did you mean? Try using the -r option to specify the remote. and then let the user repeat their command with the -r option using shell history. That saves you from having to write an interactive component, and teaches the user how to script it. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
benoit.per...@ensimag.fr writes: From: Benoit Person benoit.per...@ensimag.fr The #7 issue on git-mediawiki's issue tracker [1] states that the ability to preview content without pushing would be a nice thing to have. This commit is a first attempt to achieve it. It adds a new git command, named `git mw`. This command accepts the subcommands `help` and `preview` for now. Review could be easier if you have PATCH 1/2 introducing the command with only help (essentially to check that the build system works), and then focus on preview. I won't insist in splitting this particular commit, just take it as an advice for future work. --- a/contrib/mw-to-git/Makefile +++ b/contrib/mw-to-git/Makefile @@ -5,13 +5,17 @@ ## Build git-remote-mediawiki SCRIPT_PERL=git-remote-mediawiki.perl +SCRIPT_PERL_MW=git-mw.perl Why do you need another variable? Just adding git-mw.perl to SCRIPT_PERL should do it, no? (Well, probably the make SCRIPT_PERL=$(SCRIPT_PERL) lacks quotes around the argument, but then you should fix that). +# Constants +# Mediawiki filenames can contain forward slashes. This variable decides by which pattern they should be replaced +Readonly::scalar $SLASH_REPLACEMENT = %2F; This one is copied from git-remote-mediawiki.perl, and is a git-mediawiki specific thing, so it would not make sense to put it into Git.pm. This starts convincing me that we should have a GitMediawiki.pm or so, and both scripts should use it. Another option would be to put everything in git-remote-mediawiki.perl, and probably to have git mw as a wrapper around it (to avoid having to type git remote-mediawiki which is a bit long). But the script starts being a bit long, so I think it makes more sense to split it. So I'd say PATCH 1/3 : introduce git mw PATCH 2/3 : move sharable code to a new module (and make sure it's installed properly by make install) PATCH 3/3 : actually implement the preview feature Perhaps others will have other/better advices. + # Auto-loading in browser + if ($autoload) { + open(my $browser, -|:encoding(UTF-8), xdg-open .$preview_file_name); That could be read from Git's configuration, and default to xdg-open. But you don't want to hardcode it in the middle of the code. Also, why use open if you don't want to communicate with the process? system would be sufficient, and won't need close. Prefer passing an array of arguments, instead of concatenating strings and then rely on command-line parsing to re-split it. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH/RFC] git-remote-mediawiki: new tool to preview local changes without pushing
From: Benoit Person benoit.per...@ensimag.fr The #7 issue on git-mediawiki's issue tracker [1] states that the ability to preview content without pushing would be a nice thing to have. This commit is a first attempt to achieve it. It adds a new git command, named `git mw`. This command accepts the subcommands `help` and `preview` for now. The default behaviour for the `preview` subcommand is: 1- Find the remote name of the current branch's upstream and check if it's a wiki one with its url (ie: mediawiki://) 2- Parse the content of the local file (given as argument) using the distant wiki's API. 3- Retrieve the current page on the distant mediawiki. 4- Merge those those contents. 5- Convert relative links to absolute ones. 6- Save the result on disk. The command also accepts argument for more controls: --autoload | -a tries to launch the newly generated file in the user's default browser --remote | -r provides a way to select the distant mediawiki in which the user wants to preview his file. --output | -o enables the user to choose the output filename. Default output filename is based on the input filename in which the extension `.mw` is replaced with `.html`. It works but a couple of points trouble me: 1- I had to copy two functions from `git-remote-mediawiki.perl`, I don't really know how we could factorize those things ? I don't think it makes much sense to create a package just for them ? 2- The current behavior is to crash if the current branch do not have an upstream branch on a valid mediawiki remote. To find that specific remote, it runs `git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name @{upstream}` which will return something like `/refs/remotes/$remote_name/master`. 2a- maybe there is a better way to find that remote name ? 2b- would it be useful to add a fallback if that search fails ? searching for a valid mediawiki remote url in all the remotes returned by `git remote` for instance ? 3- The current idea of merging the content of the mediawiki's current page with new content fails when the page is a local creation. (Hence the error message when we get a bad result from the `get` call l.129). I thought about two ways to overcome this: 3a- Use the wiki's homepage for the template. 3b- A two-step process: - first we create a general template (based on the wiki's homepage) with a specific flag at the content position. This step is done only if that template do not exists locally. - replace the specific flag with the newly parsed content. The downfall of those two solutions is on links like 'talk', 'view source' etc ... those will need to be updated to. And evven then, it will still fails for page created only locally. 4- In the Makefile, there is certainly a more Makefily way to do it but I had no luck finding it and still preserving the factorization for the `build`, `install` and `clean` target. I ended up with something like this: build: $(BUILD_SCRIPTS) $(BUILD_SCRIPTS): $(MAKE) -C $(GIT_ROOT_DIR) SCRIPT_PERL=$@ \ build-perl-script install: ... clean: ... but clearly, for only two scripts, it's more a refucktoring than a refactoring :/ . [1] https://github.com/moy/Git-Mediawiki/issues/7 Signed-off-by: Benoit Person benoit.per...@ensimag.fr Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr --- contrib/mw-to-git/Makefile| 4 + contrib/mw-to-git/git-mw.perl | 249 ++ 2 files changed, 253 insertions(+) create mode 100644 contrib/mw-to-git/git-mw.perl diff --git a/contrib/mw-to-git/Makefile b/contrib/mw-to-git/Makefile index f149719..0cba1e3 100644 --- a/contrib/mw-to-git/Makefile +++ b/contrib/mw-to-git/Makefile @@ -5,13 +5,17 @@ ## Build git-remote-mediawiki SCRIPT_PERL=git-remote-mediawiki.perl +SCRIPT_PERL_MW=git-mw.perl GIT_ROOT_DIR=../.. HERE=contrib/mw-to-git/ SCRIPT_PERL_FULL=$(patsubst %,$(HERE)/%,$(SCRIPT_PERL)) +SCRIPT_PERL_MW_FULL=$(patsubst %,$(HERE)/%,$(SCRIPT_PERL_MW)) all: build build install clean: $(MAKE) -C $(GIT_ROOT_DIR) SCRIPT_PERL=$(SCRIPT_PERL_FULL) \ $@-perl-script + $(MAKE) -C $(GIT_ROOT_DIR) SCRIPT_PERL=$(SCRIPT_PERL_MW_FULL) \ +$@-perl-script \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/contrib/mw-to-git/git-mw.perl b/contrib/mw-to-git/git-mw.perl new file mode 100644 index 000..a92c459 --- /dev/null +++ b/contrib/mw-to-git/git-mw.perl @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ +#! /usr/bin/perl + +# Copyright (C) 2013 +# Benoit Person benoit.per...@ensimag.imag.fr +# Celestin Matte celestin.ma...@ensimag.imag.fr +# License: GPL v2 or later + +# Tools attached to git-remote-mediawiki (help, preview ...) +# Documentation bugtracker: https://github.com/moy/Git-Mediawiki/ + +use strict; +use warnings; + +use Git; +use