Re: [PATCH v5 00/36] Massive improvents to rebase and cherry-pick
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: Same as before, but: Also, remove the patches from Martin von Zweigbergk, because apparently some people have trouble understanding that they were not part of this series. Please try not to sound disgruntled. This attitude is toxic. You have turned this change into a complaint: that some people have trouble understanding which shows a genuine lack of understanding and compassion on your part. Instead you can phrase your change notes more helpfully if you make changes only when you yourself actually believe the change should be made. If you cannot do this, perhaps you can pretend. Also, remove the patches from Martin von Zweigbergk, which are not a part of this series. Or even this: Also, remove the patches from Martin von Zweigbergk to avoid confusing reviewers. Thanks, Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v5 00/36] Massive improvents to rebase and cherry-pick
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Phil Hord phil.h...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: Same as before, but: Also, remove the patches from Martin von Zweigbergk, because apparently some people have trouble understanding that they were not part of this series. Please try not to sound disgruntled. This attitude is toxic. You have turned this change into a complaint: that some people have trouble understanding which shows a genuine lack of understanding and compassion on your part. Instead you can phrase your change notes more helpfully if you make changes only when you yourself actually believe the change should be made. If you cannot do this, perhaps you can pretend. That would be dishonest. Moreover, there wasn't a good reason to remove these patches, I made it clear I added those patches only to make sure the real patches of this series worked correctly. Also, I clarified that to Thomas Rast[1], only to receive a totally unconstructive comment[2]. Why don't you ask Thomas Rast to be more constructive[2]? Then Johan Herland uses that as an example of a constructive comment[3]. Why don't you correct Johan Herland? No, you pick the easy target: me. I already dd more than my fair share by carrying these 36 patches through several iterations, yet you ask *more* of me. Why don't you ask more of the people that just hit reply on their MUA? Thomas' task was easy; he simply had to say Oh, these aren't meant to be applied, got it. [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227039 [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227040 [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227102 -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v5 00/36] Massive improvents to rebase and cherry-pick
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Phil Hord phil.h...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: Same as before, but: Also, remove the patches from Martin von Zweigbergk, because apparently some people have trouble understanding that they were not part of this series. Please try not to sound disgruntled. This attitude is toxic. You have turned this change into a complaint: that some people have trouble understanding which shows a genuine lack of understanding and compassion on your part. Instead you can phrase your change notes more helpfully if you make changes only when you yourself actually believe the change should be made. If you cannot do this, perhaps you can pretend. That would be dishonest. Moreover, there wasn't a good reason to remove these patches, I made it clear I added those patches only to make sure the real patches of this series worked correctly. Also, I clarified that to Thomas Rast[1], only to receive a totally unconstructive comment[2]. Why don't you ask Thomas Rast to be more constructive[2]? Then Johan Herland uses that as an example of a constructive comment[3]. Why don't you correct Johan Herland? I do not see what their comments have to do with your attitude. Aren't your own man with cogent self-will and personal responsibility? Why should I also have to consider these other emails which I have not bothered to read yet? No, you pick the easy target: me. You seem to have mistaken me for someone else. Moreover, you seem to have mistaken you for someone else. You are the least easy target I know of on this list. Everyone else seems open to community standards. I already dd more than my fair share by carrying these 36 patches through several iterations, yet you ask *more* of me. Why don't you ask more of the people that just hit reply on their MUA? Thomas' task was easy; he simply had to say Oh, these aren't meant to be applied, got it. [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227039 [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227040 [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227102 I did not comment on their posts because they did not catch my eye. Rebase and cherry-pick improvements are interesting to me, so I read your post. I will try not to make this mistake again. Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v5 00/36] Massive improvents to rebase and cherry-pick
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Phil Hord phil.h...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Phil Hord phil.h...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: Same as before, but: Also, remove the patches from Martin von Zweigbergk, because apparently some people have trouble understanding that they were not part of this series. Please try not to sound disgruntled. This attitude is toxic. You have turned this change into a complaint: that some people have trouble understanding which shows a genuine lack of understanding and compassion on your part. Instead you can phrase your change notes more helpfully if you make changes only when you yourself actually believe the change should be made. If you cannot do this, perhaps you can pretend. That would be dishonest. Moreover, there wasn't a good reason to remove these patches, I made it clear I added those patches only to make sure the real patches of this series worked correctly. Also, I clarified that to Thomas Rast[1], only to receive a totally unconstructive comment[2]. Why don't you ask Thomas Rast to be more constructive[2]? Then Johan Herland uses that as an example of a constructive comment[3]. Why don't you correct Johan Herland? I do not see what their comments have to do with your attitude. My attitude is fine. I sent a lot of patches, and I made clear that some of them were meant only to test the rest. And I clarified that twice. There's nothing wrong with that. Aren't your own man with cogent self-will and personal responsibility? Why should I also have to consider these other emails which I have not bothered to read yet? Don't be that girlfriend that brings the times you haven't picked up the towel properly when talking about something completely and totally different. When talking about the attitude in *this* patch series, limit yourself to *this* patch series. No, you pick the easy target: me. You seem to have mistaken me for someone else. Moreover, you seem to have mistaken you for someone else. You are the least easy target I know of on this list. Everyone else seems open to community standards. And yet you try to correct me, who did nothing wrong. And ignore the transgressions of the other people, whom I already demonstrated actually *did* do something wrong. How convenient of you to not mention my arguments *at all*. I already dd more than my fair share by carrying these 36 patches through several iterations, yet you ask *more* of me. Why don't you ask more of the people that just hit reply on their MUA? Thomas' task was easy; he simply had to say Oh, these aren't meant to be applied, got it. [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227039 [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227040 [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/227102 I did not comment on their posts because they did not catch my eye. Rebase and cherry-pick improvements are interesting to me, so I read your post. I will try not to make this mistake again. Yes, because my patches are so obviously wrong. If you were a truly productive member of this community, you would ignore all the bullshit, take the patches, fix whatever is technically wrong with them (nothing), and resend them. But no, that would be way too productive. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v5 00/36] Massive improvents to rebase and cherry-pick
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: Same as before, but: Also, remove the patches from Martin von Zweigbergk, because apparently some people have trouble understanding that they were not part of this series. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
