[gwt-contrib] Re: Incubator code review: .classpath and .incubator fixes
It would be really nice if we could do this, and once we have out of process hosted mode we will be able to. If you look at your class path rules, notice you have "gwt-dev-windows" hard-coded in your classpath dependencies. Cheers, Emily On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Ray Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No longer use mysterious gwt-resources directory, and instead tie straight > to the needed GWT_TOOLS entries. > rjrjr > > -- "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[gwt-contrib] Re: incubator code review
The problem is that both versions on these widgets need to exist simultaneously for a period of time, to give our users enough space to move from the deprecated version to the non-deprecated one. For date picker, in specific, because it will be in the first 1.6 milestone, it does not seem worth people's time to migrate from widgetideas to the gen2 version at this late date, as while we will leave the date picker in gwt-incubator as a convenience, both versions will be deprecated within a matter of a couple of more weeks. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Isaac Truett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is that going to turn into a revolving door of new packages as each > generation of widgets requires it's own namespace? It seems to me that > the gen2 package idea was a mistake of convenience and maybe should > have been a branch (or branches) that got merged back into trunk once > it stabilized. > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:57 AM, John LaBanca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is this a good idea? I think we should just deprecate the widgetideas > > version now in favor of the gen2 version. I didn't attempt to copy > > ScrollTable changes back to the widgetideas version, it would be a > > nightmare. IMHO, development on widgetideas code should be closed once a > > gen2 replacement is available. > > > > Thanks, > > John LaBanca > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Code review request: > >> > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/source/detail?r=1250 > >> > >> Copying gen2-DropDownPanel over the widgetideas-DropDownPanel rather > then > >> patching the widgetideas version, as this way we only maintain one > version > >> of DropDownPanel, which is going to be depricated as soon as the first > 1.6 > >> milestone is released. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand > >> binary, and those who don't" > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[gwt-contrib] Re: incubator code review
Is that going to turn into a revolving door of new packages as each generation of widgets requires it's own namespace? It seems to me that the gen2 package idea was a mistake of convenience and maybe should have been a branch (or branches) that got merged back into trunk once it stabilized. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:57 AM, John LaBanca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this a good idea? I think we should just deprecate the widgetideas > version now in favor of the gen2 version. I didn't attempt to copy > ScrollTable changes back to the widgetideas version, it would be a > nightmare. IMHO, development on widgetideas code should be closed once a > gen2 replacement is available. > > Thanks, > John LaBanca > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Code review request: >> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/source/detail?r=1250 >> >> Copying gen2-DropDownPanel over the widgetideas-DropDownPanel rather then >> patching the widgetideas version, as this way we only maintain one version >> of DropDownPanel, which is going to be depricated as soon as the first 1.6 >> milestone is released. >> >> >> -- >> "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand >> binary, and those who don't" > > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[gwt-contrib] Re: incubator code review
Is this a good idea? I think we should just deprecate the widgetideas version now in favor of the gen2 version. I didn't attempt to copy ScrollTable changes back to the widgetideas version, it would be a nightmare. IMHO, development on widgetideas code should be closed once a gen2 replacement is available. Thanks, John LaBanca [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Code review request: > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/source/detail?r=1250 > > Copying gen2-DropDownPanel over the widgetideas-DropDownPanel rather then > patching the widgetideas version, as this way we only maintain one version > of DropDownPanel, which is going to be depricated as soon as the first 1.6 > milestone is released. > > > -- > "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand > binary, and those who don't" > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[gwt-contrib] Re: Incubator Code Review Request: GWTCanvas and ImageLoader
Emily seems to have just committed this at r930, but LGTM too. On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Jaime Yap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch taken against Incubator trunk r.927 adds some comments to : > com.google.gwt.widgetideas.graphics.client.impl.GWTCanvasImplIE6.java > for some funky flooring trick that needed some explanation. > Also includes a fix for ImageLoader, where in IE the "onLoad" event would > fire before we get done setting up the callbacks. > This should have gone out along time ago, but it seemed to slip off my radar > back when I first got it ready. > -Jaime > > > > > -- Alex Rudnick swe, gwt, atl --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
