Tomas By to...@basun.net writes:
On Sun, February 28, 2010 23:59, Neil Jerram wrote:
This is really a stab in the dark - but could you try using a name for
the Scheme-level procedure that is different from the module name?
Currently they are both mytest.
I think there could be some residual nonsense meaning for a binding that
has the same name as the module...
Thanks for the suggestion. I tried changing the name in the define_gsubr
and export statements and it made no difference.
But it's ok. Compiling my own binary is fine for what I am doing. I'm not
sure why I bother so much about this in the first place. Maybe I should
have my head looked at.
OK, fine. But please do come and ask us again if you need to, and we'll
have another go.
Neil
