ping isn't latency, ping is there and back. latency is here to there,
the time it takes your command to reach the server
On 7/19/05, Whisper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Can somebody please explain why the latency measurements for:
The Scoreboard
Net_graph 3
Stats rcon stats
Are 3 completely different and unrelated numbers, all purporting to be
measuring latency (ping) of the players connection.
As a rule of thumb, it appears (but I could be wrong and it could just be
me) that the scoreboard ping is always the lowest,
net_graph 3 ping is twice that of the scoreboard
stats rcon stats it twice that of net_graph 3.
The only thing that makes sense is the scoreboard latency, which seems to
be for the most part, a reasonably accurate reflection of what your latency
is if you measured it with a cmdline ping in Windows.
Anyhow, if somebody could provide a accurate logical explanation as to why
these 3 latency measurements are completely different and why, it would be
much appreciated.
Cheers
--
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
--
Clayton Macleod
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
