Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-29 Thread David W. Jones 

On 11/29/2017 12:23 PM, Terry Duell wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:13:46 +1100, David W. Jones 
 wrote:


I've been using Hugin for many years, maybe it's me, but how do you 
stitch *part* of a project?


Deselect the images not wanted for that part, stitch and save, then 
select the images for the next part, and so on.


Thanks!

Only way I've figured out is to create the main project and save it, 
then copy that PTO file as many times as needed for new separate 
subprojects. Then edit each subproject, remove the images that don't 
belong in it, then save and stitch each subproject. Then create a new 
"main" project to stitch together the results of the sub projects. Is 
that what you mean?




To stitch all the sub-panos, I just load them all as a new project and 
proceed as one normally would.
It may not be the smartest way to do it, but it is an approach that has 
worked for me in the past. I've not done any of these recently.


I haven't had to, either. But a few days ago I stitched a 31-frame strip 
pano (in one pass) using my present camera's 6MP images. I monitored the 
memory usage, and it hit 12GB (out of the present 16GB).


I'm hoping to replace the present camera with a 24-36MPX camera, so I 
expect memory consumption will REALLY climb working with those images.


--
David W. Jones
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com

--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/b4fa7814-2c88-d3dd-3e58-1a0ed63209e9%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-29 Thread Terry Duell 
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:39:47 +1100, Paul Elliott  
 wrote:



Hi,
I've been following this thread as I'm having similar problems stitching  
a

312 image pano to a final size of over 600Mpx. Using some of the options
above in the thread I've got it to work with JPGs and I'm now stitching
Tiffs for the final output. In the process I tried breaking it down into
several strips all 360 HFV but Hugin failed to load them, it just crashed
every time I loaded an image. I'm using the current download on win10
running on an I7 8700K / GTX1060 and 16GB Ram.
Should Hugin be able to load wide strips or would I be better breaking it
into squares?


I'm not sure what the limits are but I would try with strips of reduced  
hfov until I had success.


Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell

--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.zahndkz7rs0ygh%40localhost.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-29 Thread Paul Elliott 
Hi,
I've been following this thread as I'm having similar problems stitching a 
312 image pano to a final size of over 600Mpx. Using some of the options 
above in the thread I've got it to work with JPGs and I'm now stitching 
Tiffs for the final output. In the process I tried breaking it down into 
several strips all 360 HFV but Hugin failed to load them, it just crashed 
every time I loaded an image. I'm using the current download on win10 
running on an I7 8700K / GTX1060 and 16GB Ram.
Should Hugin be able to load wide strips or would I be better breaking it 
into squares?
Thanks for all the input above its helped be a lot, I'm fairly new to Hugin.
Paul


On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 22:24:02 UTC, Tduell wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:13:46 +1100, David W. Jones  >   
> wrote: 
>
> > I've been using Hugin for many years, maybe it's me, but how do you   
> > stitch *part* of a project? 
>
> Deselect the images not wanted for that part, stitch and save, then select 
>   
> the images for the next part, and so on. 
>
> > Only way I've figured out is to create the main project and save it,   
> > then copy that PTO file as many times as needed for new separate   
> > subprojects. Then edit each subproject, remove the images that don't   
> > belong in it, then save and stitch each subproject. Then create a new   
> > "main" project to stitch together the results of the sub projects. Is   
> > that what you mean? 
> > 
>
> To stitch all the sub-panos, I just load them all as a new project and   
> proceed as one normally would. 
> It may not be the smartest way to do it, but it is an approach that has   
> worked for me in the past. I've not done any of these recently. 
>
> Cheers, 
> -- 
> Regards, 
> Terry Duell 
>

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/c2bbba1a-bc2d-43ec-bb31-e3a914a8121a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-29 Thread Terry Duell 
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:13:46 +1100, David W. Jones   
wrote:


I've been using Hugin for many years, maybe it's me, but how do you  
stitch *part* of a project?


Deselect the images not wanted for that part, stitch and save, then select  
the images for the next part, and so on.


Only way I've figured out is to create the main project and save it,  
then copy that PTO file as many times as needed for new separate  
subprojects. Then edit each subproject, remove the images that don't  
belong in it, then save and stitch each subproject. Then create a new  
"main" project to stitch together the results of the sub projects. Is  
that what you mean?




To stitch all the sub-panos, I just load them all as a new project and  
proceed as one normally would.
It may not be the smartest way to do it, but it is an approach that has  
worked for me in the past. I've not done any of these recently.


Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell

--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.zahkhvyars0ygh%40localhost.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-29 Thread David W. Jones 


Ah, thanks. Never tried that.

On November 29, 2017 3:33:04 AM HST, 'dkloi' via hugin and other free panoramic 
software  wrote:
>In a preview window, only selected images get stitched into the final
>pano.
>
>On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 09:13:53 UTC, GnomeNomad wrote:
>>
>> On November 28, 2017 10:41:18 PM HST, Terry Duell
>> > wrote: 
>> >On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:49 +1100, Emad ud din Bhatt 
>> >   
>> >wrote: 
>> > 
>> >> *"One approach to stitch very large projects is to split your
>project 
>> >up 
>> >> into sub-projects, stitch each, then stitch the sub-panos.*" 
>> >> 
>> >> interested to know how to do it. If i output partial images than
>how 
>> >can   
>> >> i link these in one piece...questions like lens parameters, crop 
>> >factor   
>> >> etc 
>> >> etc. 
>> > 
>> >When you stitch each part of your project the stitcher will report
>the 
>> >field of view, which you should be able to use when you reload these
>  
>> >images to be stitched. 
>>
>> I've been using Hugin for many years, maybe it's me, but how do you
>stitch 
>> *part* of a project? 
>>
>> Only way I've figured out is to create the main project and save it,
>then 
>> copy that PTO file as many times as needed for new separate
>subprojects. 
>> Then edit each subproject, remove the images that don't belong in it,
>then 
>> save and stitch each subproject. Then create a new "main" project to
>stitch 
>> together the results of the sub projects. Is that what you mean? 
>>
>> Sorry if I'm just dense, but maybe it will help Emad, too. 

David W. Jones
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com

Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail.

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/7311D4EB-C887-4425-B141-CF1FA14D1A80%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-29 Thread 'dkloi' via hugin and other free panoramic software 
In a preview window, only selected images get stitched into the final pano.

On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 09:13:53 UTC, GnomeNomad wrote:
>
>
>
> On November 28, 2017 10:41:18 PM HST, Terry Duell  > wrote: 
> >On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:49 +1100, Emad ud din Bhatt 
> >   
> >wrote: 
> > 
> >> *"One approach to stitch very large projects is to split your project 
> >up 
> >> into sub-projects, stitch each, then stitch the sub-panos.*" 
> >> 
> >> interested to know how to do it. If i output partial images than how 
> >can   
> >> i link these in one piece...questions like lens parameters, crop 
> >factor   
> >> etc 
> >> etc. 
> > 
> >When you stitch each part of your project the stitcher will report the 
> >field of view, which you should be able to use when you reload these   
> >images to be stitched. 
>
> I've been using Hugin for many years, maybe it's me, but how do you stitch 
> *part* of a project? 
>
> Only way I've figured out is to create the main project and save it, then 
> copy that PTO file as many times as needed for new separate subprojects. 
> Then edit each subproject, remove the images that don't belong in it, then 
> save and stitch each subproject. Then create a new "main" project to stitch 
> together the results of the sub projects. Is that what you mean? 
>
> Sorry if I'm just dense, but maybe it will help Emad, too. 
>
>
> David W. Jones 
> gnome...@gmail.com  
> wandering the landscape of god 
> http://dancingtreefrog.com 
>
> Sent from my Android device with F/OSS K-9 Mail. 
>

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/ca18b512-2375-477b-9d1e-a9a3ac6f2c67%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-29 Thread David W. Jones 


On November 28, 2017 10:41:18 PM HST, Terry Duell  wrote:
>On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:49 +1100, Emad ud din Bhatt
>  
>wrote:
>
>> *"One approach to stitch very large projects is to split your project
>up
>> into sub-projects, stitch each, then stitch the sub-panos.*"
>>
>> interested to know how to do it. If i output partial images than how
>can  
>> i link these in one piece...questions like lens parameters, crop
>factor  
>> etc
>> etc.
>
>When you stitch each part of your project the stitcher will report the 
>field of view, which you should be able to use when you reload these  
>images to be stitched.

I've been using Hugin for many years, maybe it's me, but how do you stitch 
*part* of a project?

Only way I've figured out is to create the main project and save it, then copy 
that PTO file as many times as needed for new separate subprojects. Then edit 
each subproject, remove the images that don't belong in it, then save and 
stitch each subproject. Then create a new "main" project to stitch together the 
results of the sub projects. Is that what you mean?

Sorry if I'm just dense, but maybe it will help Emad, too.


David W. Jones
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com

Sent from my Android device with F/OSS K-9 Mail.

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/EDDE7F93-D237-43DC-9F64-650414C27048%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-29 Thread Terry Duell 

Hello Emad,

On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:49 +1100, Emad ud din Bhatt   
wrote:



I had same enblend issues. Enblend kept working working and nothing
happened at the end memory errors. I checked it with better RAM but no
success.


OK, which version of Enblend and which OS?

Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell

--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.zagili0xrs0ygh%40localhost.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-29 Thread Terry Duell 
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:03:49 +1100, Emad ud din Bhatt   
wrote:





*"One approach to stitch very large projects is to split your project up
into sub-projects, stitch each, then stitch the sub-panos.*"

interested to know how to do it. If i output partial images than how can  
i link these in one piece...questions like lens parameters, crop factor  
etc

etc.


When you stitch each part of your project the stitcher will report the  
field of view, which you should be able to use when you reload these  
images to be stitched.

How about having a try and seeing how you go.

Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell

--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.zagie4qmrs0ygh%40localhost.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-28 Thread Emad ud din Bhatt 
Hi Terry,

Yes i am referring to gigapixel pano and gigapixel images. For example
68000x18000
I had same enblend issues. Enblend kept working working and nothing
happened at the end memory errors. I checked it with better RAM but no
success.

*"One approach to stitch very large projects is to split your project up
into sub-projects, stitch each, then stitch the sub-panos.*"

interested to know how to do it. If i output partial images than how can i
link these in one piece...questions like lens parameters, crop factor etc
etc.

Thanks

Emaad





On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Terry Duell  wrote:

> Hello Emaad,
>
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:51:17 +1100, Emad ud din Bhatt 
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>>
>> Following this thread. I have raised this issue many times that hugin
>> cant stitch high res and gigapixel images. Lets c if you people can help me
>> out as well :)
>>
>>  I assume you mean a gigapixel pano, rather than 'stitch gigapixel
> images'.
>
> A couple of questions...
> Just what sort of problems have you been encountering?
> What do you mean by high res images? i.e. what size?
>
> One approach to stitch very large projects is to split your project up
> into sub-projects, stitch each, then stitch the sub-panos.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Regards,
> Terry Duell
>
> --
> A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
> ---You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
> gid/hugin-ptx/op.zaf89fvbrs0ygh%40localhost.
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 


*Emaad*
www.flickr.com/emaad

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CALj_J37-B0i8Xq3bj3-i8K%2Bt9fqVZb18nTXS0W6Fbte7REv8zw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-28 Thread Terry Duell 

Hello Emaad,

On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:51:17 +1100, Emad ud din Bhatt   
wrote:



Hi All,

Following this thread. I have raised this issue many times that hugin  
cant stitch high res and gigapixel images. Lets c if you people can help  
me out as well :)



 I assume you mean a gigapixel pano, rather than 'stitch gigapixel images'.

A couple of questions...
Just what sort of problems have you been encountering?
What do you mean by high res images? i.e. what size?

One approach to stitch very large projects is to split your project up  
into sub-projects, stitch each, then stitch the sub-panos.


Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell

--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.zaf89fvbrs0ygh%40localhost.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-28 Thread Emad ud din Bhatt 
Hi All,

Following this thread. I have raised this issue many times that hugin cant
stitch high res and gigapixel images. Lets c if you people can help me out
as well :)

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:47 AM,  wrote:

> I use also version 4.2
>
> This night I will try again a run without parameters
>
> --
> A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/hugin-ptx/ddd5f21d-1cbe-4ce1-a67e-27a9361e272d%40googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 


*Emaad*
www.flickr.com/emaad

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CALj_J34X5EW9neHtvtx%3DZ%3DYVQwrhHJvXwysayDTyT5wQGsSjWg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-05 Thread jojaeger12031992 
I use also version 4.2

This night I will try again a run without parameters

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/ddd5f21d-1cbe-4ce1-a67e-27a9361e272d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-05 Thread David W. Jones 
Which version of enblend was that? I have enblend 4.2 on this laptop and 
have never used either of those settings.


On 11/05/2017 12:01 AM, jojaeger12031...@gmail.com wrote:

Yeah this really looks like modern art :D
The size was calculated by hugin.

I have player around with the options:
For me the best setting is:

--pre-assemble --primary-seam-generator=nearest-feature-transform

No black holes & full size panorama

Am Samstag, 4. November 2017 06:12:01 UTC+1 schrieb GnomeNomad:

Wow, that's a major abstract/psychedlic blowup in middle of the 2nd
(larger) image.

I have no idea where it might come from. Anyone else?

Just out of curiousity ... was that 36336 pixel width set by Hugin
(using the Stitcher tab's "Calculate Optimal Width" button), or a width
you specified?

On 11/02/2017 09:39 PM, jojaeger...@gmail.com wrote:
 > This night hugin success the build process with no error.
 >
 > One with a width of 2
 > One with a width of 36336
 >
 > But here you can see yourself, something went wrong:
 > www.dropbox.com/s/bjswqcl2s4nurg2/20k_36k.png?dl=0




--
David W. Jones
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com

--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/3aca95fa-ed30-95ba-8531-dd03680b19fa%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-05 Thread jojaeger12031992 
Yeah this really looks like modern art :D
The size was calculated by hugin.

I have player around with the options:
For me the best setting is:

--pre-assemble --primary-seam-generator=nearest-feature-transform

No black holes & full size panorama

Am Samstag, 4. November 2017 06:12:01 UTC+1 schrieb GnomeNomad:
>
> Wow, that's a major abstract/psychedlic blowup in middle of the 2nd 
> (larger) image. 
>
> I have no idea where it might come from. Anyone else? 
>
> Just out of curiousity ... was that 36336 pixel width set by Hugin 
> (using the Stitcher tab's "Calculate Optimal Width" button), or a width 
> you specified? 
>
> On 11/02/2017 09:39 PM, jojaeger...@gmail.com  wrote: 
> > This night hugin success the build process with no error. 
> > 
> > One with a width of 2 
> > One with a width of 36336 
> > 
> > But here you can see yourself, something went wrong: 
> > www.dropbox.com/s/bjswqcl2s4nurg2/20k_36k.png?dl=0 
> > 
> > 
> > Am Freitag, 3. November 2017 01:09:25 UTC+1 schrieb GnomeNomad: 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On November 2, 2017 1:20:04 PM HST, Sean Greenslade wrote: 
> >  >On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:42:36PM -0700, jojaeger...@gmail.com 
> >  >wrote: 
> >  >> Thanks for your reply. 
> >  >> Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated. 
> >  >> 
> >  >> Exsample from Enblend: 
> >  >> http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm 
> >  
> >  >> 
> >  >> Here the machine just have 2GB RAM and it works for a bigger 
> >  >solution. 
> >  >> 
> >  >> Or is this a different version of enblend? 
> >  > 
> >  >That article is apparently from 2004 and references version 2.0. I 
> >  >would 
> >  >imagine there have been significant changes since then. Also, it 
> uses 
> >  >only 2 source images that contain solid rectangles of color. The 
> seam 
> >  >finder isn't gonna do much with those. 
> > 
> > Many years ago, I produced a simple strip pano that covered about 10 
> > miles of coastline with 6MP images. It resulted in a 768MB 16-bit 
> > TIFF. I stitched it on a Linux system with 2GB RAM and lots of swap 
> > space. It completed successfully but IIRC took 16 hours. 
> > 
> > Nothing like the pano you're talking about here, but maybe an 
> > indication that it could be successful with enough swap space and 
> time? 
>
>
> -- 
> David W. Jones 
> gnome...@gmail.com  
> wandering the landscape of god 
> http://dancingtreefrog.com 
>

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/c9fbfd45-301e-45ab-aca6-8ee41532be37%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-04 Thread 'dkloi' via hugin and other free panoramic software 
Try specifying nft as the seam generator instead of graph cut in the 
enblend options. I ran into problems where the default seam generation 
method was coming up with really bizarre seams, hence leading to weird 
results in the final stitch.

On Friday, 3 November 2017 07:39:06 UTC, jojaeger...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> This night hugin success the build process with no error.
>
> One with a width of 2
> One with a width of 36336
>
> But here you can see yourself, something went wrong:
> www.dropbox.com/s/bjswqcl2s4nurg2/20k_36k.png?dl=0
>
>
> Am Freitag, 3. November 2017 01:09:25 UTC+1 schrieb GnomeNomad:
>>
>>
>>
>> On November 2, 2017 1:20:04 PM HST, Sean Greenslade <
>> se...@seangreenslade.com> wrote: 
>> >On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:42:36PM -0700, jojaeger...@gmail.com 
>> >wrote: 
>> >> Thanks for your reply. 
>> >> Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated. 
>> >> 
>> >> Exsample from Enblend: 
>> >> http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm 
>> >> 
>> >> Here the machine just have 2GB RAM and it works for a bigger 
>> >solution. 
>> >> 
>> >> Or is this a different version of enblend? 
>> > 
>> >That article is apparently from 2004 and references version 2.0. I 
>> >would 
>> >imagine there have been significant changes since then. Also, it uses 
>> >only 2 source images that contain solid rectangles of color. The seam 
>> >finder isn't gonna do much with those. 
>>
>> Many years ago, I produced a simple strip pano that covered about 10 
>> miles of coastline with 6MP images. It resulted in a 768MB 16-bit TIFF. I 
>> stitched it on a Linux system with 2GB RAM and lots of swap space. It 
>> completed successfully but IIRC took 16 hours. 
>>
>> Nothing like the pano you're talking about here, but maybe an indication 
>> that it could be successful with enough swap space and time? 
>>
>>
>> David W. Jones 
>> gnome...@gmail.com 
>> wandering the landscape of god 
>> http://dancingtreefrog.com 
>>
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. 
>>
>

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/078135e7-23df-4bf9-8672-964c4b3f574c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-03 Thread David W. Jones 
Wow, that's a major abstract/psychedlic blowup in middle of the 2nd 
(larger) image.


I have no idea where it might come from. Anyone else?

Just out of curiousity ... was that 36336 pixel width set by Hugin 
(using the Stitcher tab's "Calculate Optimal Width" button), or a width 
you specified?


On 11/02/2017 09:39 PM, jojaeger12031...@gmail.com wrote:

This night hugin success the build process with no error.

One with a width of 2
One with a width of 36336

But here you can see yourself, something went wrong:
www.dropbox.com/s/bjswqcl2s4nurg2/20k_36k.png?dl=0


Am Freitag, 3. November 2017 01:09:25 UTC+1 schrieb GnomeNomad:



On November 2, 2017 1:20:04 PM HST, Sean Greenslade wrote:
 >On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:42:36PM -0700, jojaeger...@gmail.com
 >wrote:
 >> Thanks for your reply.
 >> Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated.
 >>
 >> Exsample from Enblend:
 >> http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm

 >>
 >> Here the machine just have 2GB RAM and it works for a bigger
 >solution.
 >>
 >> Or is this a different version of enblend?
 >
 >That article is apparently from 2004 and references version 2.0. I
 >would
 >imagine there have been significant changes since then. Also, it uses
 >only 2 source images that contain solid rectangles of color. The seam
 >finder isn't gonna do much with those.

Many years ago, I produced a simple strip pano that covered about 10
miles of coastline with 6MP images. It resulted in a 768MB 16-bit
TIFF. I stitched it on a Linux system with 2GB RAM and lots of swap
space. It completed successfully but IIRC took 16 hours.

Nothing like the pano you're talking about here, but maybe an
indication that it could be successful with enough swap space and time?



--
David W. Jones
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com

--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/06bf8be9-1bd8-cc01-ad61-63f8e85bf6bd%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-03 Thread jojaeger12031992 
This night hugin success the build process with no error.

One with a width of 2
One with a width of 36336

But here you can see yourself, something went wrong:
www.dropbox.com/s/bjswqcl2s4nurg2/20k_36k.png?dl=0


Am Freitag, 3. November 2017 01:09:25 UTC+1 schrieb GnomeNomad:
>
>
>
> On November 2, 2017 1:20:04 PM HST, Sean Greenslade <
> se...@seangreenslade.com > wrote: 
> >On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:42:36PM -0700, jojaeger...@gmail.com 
>  
> >wrote: 
> >> Thanks for your reply. 
> >> Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated. 
> >> 
> >> Exsample from Enblend: 
> >> http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm 
> >> 
> >> Here the machine just have 2GB RAM and it works for a bigger 
> >solution. 
> >> 
> >> Or is this a different version of enblend? 
> > 
> >That article is apparently from 2004 and references version 2.0. I 
> >would 
> >imagine there have been significant changes since then. Also, it uses 
> >only 2 source images that contain solid rectangles of color. The seam 
> >finder isn't gonna do much with those. 
>
> Many years ago, I produced a simple strip pano that covered about 10 miles 
> of coastline with 6MP images. It resulted in a 768MB 16-bit TIFF. I 
> stitched it on a Linux system with 2GB RAM and lots of swap space. It 
> completed successfully but IIRC took 16 hours. 
>
> Nothing like the pano you're talking about here, but maybe an indication 
> that it could be successful with enough swap space and time? 
>
>
> David W. Jones 
> gnome...@gmail.com  
> wandering the landscape of god 
> http://dancingtreefrog.com 
>
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. 
>

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/42f18e99-f666-40ef-b78c-04834535e78f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread David W. Jones 


On November 2, 2017 1:20:04 PM HST, Sean Greenslade  
wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:42:36PM -0700, jojaeger12031...@gmail.com
>wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated.
>> 
>> Exsample from Enblend:
>> http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm
>> 
>> Here the machine just have 2GB RAM and it works for a bigger
>solution.
>> 
>> Or is this a different version of enblend?
>
>That article is apparently from 2004 and references version 2.0. I
>would
>imagine there have been significant changes since then. Also, it uses
>only 2 source images that contain solid rectangles of color. The seam
>finder isn't gonna do much with those.

Many years ago, I produced a simple strip pano that covered about 10 miles of 
coastline with 6MP images. It resulted in a 768MB 16-bit TIFF. I stitched it on 
a Linux system with 2GB RAM and lots of swap space. It completed successfully 
but IIRC took 16 hours.

Nothing like the pano you're talking about here, but maybe an indication that 
it could be successful with enough swap space and time?


David W. Jones
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com

Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail.

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/E7F0D2BD-78EC-4967-99AA-36518B08E3FC%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread Sean Greenslade 
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:42:36PM -0700, jojaeger12031...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
> Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated.
> 
> Exsample from Enblend:
> http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm
> 
> Here the machine just have 2GB RAM and it works for a bigger solution.
> 
> Or is this a different version of enblend?

That article is apparently from 2004 and references version 2.0. I would
imagine there have been significant changes since then. Also, it uses
only 2 source images that contain solid rectangles of color. The seam
finder isn't gonna do much with those.

--Sean

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/20171102232004.GA21541%40coach.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread Gunter Königsmann 
Image cache sounds like something that keeps entire images in memory so
they can be accessed faster. What I am not sure is if enblend has a tile
cache like the gimp that splits the image into tiles and acts only on as
many tiles at a time as fit into the RAM.

...

In case that enblend wants to access the whole image all the time that
doesn't help much. But... ... providing more swap memory either might slow
down everything so much that it doesn't make sense to wait for stitching to
end or it could cause stitching to be successful. No idea which of these is
true for enblend, though.

Am 02.11.2017 8:42 nachm. schrieb :

> Thanks for your reply.
> Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated.
>
> Exsample from Enblend:
> http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm
>
> Here the machine just have 2GB RAM and it works for a bigger solution.
>
> Or is this a different version of enblend?
>
> Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2017 20:39:24 UTC+1 schrieb Sean Greenslade:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:20:51PM -0700, jojaeger...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > Hi Gunter,
>> > I also see, that the RAM could be to less.
>> > But for this thing, it would be perfect, when i could activate
>> image-cache
>> > option.
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Johannes
>>
>> The image-cache feature was deprecated in 4.1 and removed in 4.2. But I
>> believe it was just a cache on the input images, so it wouldn't have
>> really helped in your scenario.
>>
>> I think you have two options. One, add more RAM / switch to a machine
>> with more RAM. Or two, stitch smaller portions of the pano separately
>> and then merge them. You could try stitching a cubemap (6x rectilinear
>> cube faces) instead of a full equirect pano.
>>
>> --Sean
>>
>> --
> A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/hugin-ptx/4f0cc932-8c0c-4022-a87b-685408423ce9%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CAMcFxV0yqBf0dNQpTXGaReKpCzGnNkbvGwTRD9CFR7D-k3JxDA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread jojaeger12031992 
Thanks for your reply.
Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated.

Exsample from Enblend:
http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm

Here the machine just have 2GB RAM and it works for a bigger solution.

Or is this a different version of enblend?

Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2017 20:39:24 UTC+1 schrieb Sean Greenslade:
>
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:20:51PM -0700, jojaeger...@gmail.com 
>  wrote: 
> > Hi Gunter, 
> > I also see, that the RAM could be to less. 
> > But for this thing, it would be perfect, when i could activate 
> image-cache 
> > option. 
> > 
> > Best Regards, 
> > Johannes 
>
> The image-cache feature was deprecated in 4.1 and removed in 4.2. But I 
> believe it was just a cache on the input images, so it wouldn't have 
> really helped in your scenario. 
>
> I think you have two options. One, add more RAM / switch to a machine 
> with more RAM. Or two, stitch smaller portions of the pano separately 
> and then merge them. You could try stitching a cubemap (6x rectilinear 
> cube faces) instead of a full equirect pano. 
>
> --Sean 
>
>

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/4f0cc932-8c0c-4022-a87b-685408423ce9%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread Sean Greenslade 
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:20:51PM -0700, jojaeger12031...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Gunter,
> I also see, that the RAM could be to less.
> But for this thing, it would be perfect, when i could activate image-cache 
> option.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Johannes

The image-cache feature was deprecated in 4.1 and removed in 4.2. But I
believe it was just a cache on the input images, so it wouldn't have
really helped in your scenario.

I think you have two options. One, add more RAM / switch to a machine
with more RAM. Or two, stitch smaller portions of the pano separately
and then merge them. You could try stitching a cubemap (6x rectilinear
cube faces) instead of a full equirect pano.

--Sean

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/20171102193913.GA25506%40coach.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread jojaeger12031992 
Hi Gunter,
I also see, that the RAM could be to less.
But for this thing, it would be perfect, when i could activate image-cache 
option.

Best Regards,
Johannes

Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2017 19:56:25 UTC+1 schrieb Gunter Königsmann:
>
> According to my Maxima On Android your output picture will already use up 
> nearly 5 Gigabytes before compression. And I don't know if for stitching 
> the image one "before" and one "after" version has to be kept and how much 
> temporary data is needed for this process. Also I don't know if internally 
> hugin uses more than 16 bits of depth in order to reduce rounding errors so 
> I expect your stitching job to require at least double your RAM. But my 
> guess might be entirely wrong.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>   Gunter
>
> Am 02.11.2017 19:40 schrieb :
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to build a GigaPano 360°.
>>
>> I have a perfect project file and can generate a Panorama out of it with 
>> small width (~6000*3000 pixels)
>> But i want to build it with full size 36092*18046pixels. (72 pictures 
>> with 16Bit Tiff)
>>
>> I have to activate the "--fine-mask" option, so *enblend* will finish 
>> the work, otherwise i get the following error:
>> Enblend error: Mask is entirely black, but white image was not identified 
>> as redundant
>>
>> But with this option, after 8 hours enblend stop working with a "out of 
>> memory" error
>>
>> So now my question, is it possible to activate the image-cache option for 
>> enblend?
>>
>> I also had another problem with the "--fine-mask":
>>
>> Überblendung der Bilder…
>>> enblend: warning: option "--fine-mask" combined with option 
>>> "--primary-seam-generator=graphcut"
>>> enblend: warning: incompatible with mask optimization,
>>> enblend: note: defaulting to no optimization
>>
>>
>> My System:
>> Windows 10
>> RAM: 8GB
>> i7-4720HQ 2.6GHz
>> Nvidia GTX960M
>>
>> -- 
>> A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
>> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to hugin-ptx+...@googlegroups.com .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/620af3e3-d5aa-4989-8e0d-6bf94f2e206a%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> 
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/2e7a3f89-b4f6-4037-9d02-2efe64c1f06a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with stitching a GigaPano ...

2017-11-02 Thread Gunter Königsmann 
According to my Maxima On Android your output picture will already use up
nearly 5 Gigabytes before compression. And I don't know if for stitching
the image one "before" and one "after" version has to be kept and how much
temporary data is needed for this process. Also I don't know if internally
hugin uses more than 16 bits of depth in order to reduce rounding errors so
I expect your stitching job to require at least double your RAM. But my
guess might be entirely wrong.

Kind regards,

  Gunter

Am 02.11.2017 19:40 schrieb :

> Hi,
> I'm trying to build a GigaPano 360°.
>
> I have a perfect project file and can generate a Panorama out of it with
> small width (~6000*3000 pixels)
> But i want to build it with full size 36092*18046pixels. (72 pictures with
> 16Bit Tiff)
>
> I have to activate the "--fine-mask" option, so *enblend* will finish the
> work, otherwise i get the following error:
> Enblend error: Mask is entirely black, but white image was not identified
> as redundant
>
> But with this option, after 8 hours enblend stop working with a "out of
> memory" error
>
> So now my question, is it possible to activate the image-cache option for
> enblend?
>
> I also had another problem with the "--fine-mask":
>
> Überblendung der Bilder…
>> enblend: warning: option "--fine-mask" combined with option
>> "--primary-seam-generator=graphcut"
>> enblend: warning: incompatible with mask optimization,
>> enblend: note: defaulting to no optimization
>
>
> My System:
> Windows 10
> RAM: 8GB
> i7-4720HQ 2.6GHz
> Nvidia GTX960M
>
> --
> A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/hugin-ptx/620af3e3-d5aa-4989-8e0d-6bf94f2e206a%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CAMcFxV1CS-%2BMJ%3DJmZKzs5oqcsxQOb%3DTQkxxxgmycz_%2BzL2x2EA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.