Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
John, We migrated from SAS (z/OS) to WPS last month at our (newly IBM) site. We only use SAS in batch, and we don't heavily use MXG's PDB processing, having TDS for that stuff. But we use MXG with WPS for some daily and 'Ad Hoc' reporting. For basic SAS processing, WPS is a fine replacement. Very little SAS code had to be adpated in our case. If you're using many graphic functions and/or ODS code, you might experience some gaps. Altough WPS is a young product, they're enhancing it intensively. Performance was dramatically enhanced in V2.3.1. On CPU consumption, WPS is twice as hungry as SAS. WPC's (http://www.teamwpc.co.uk/home) support is fine. If you need any other information, feel free to contact me off the list. Date:Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:51:12 -0500 From:McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: replacing SAS for SMF reports? Well, it looks like SAS is pricing itself out of our range. Or management is just doesn't think that we are getting our moneys worth or ... Anyway, other than using HLASM or maybe shudder COBOL, anybody have any suggestions how to easily do some ad hoc type SMF reporting? What would be really nice would be some sort of SMF to XML output program. I really like the IRRADU00 output (RACF SMF data translated to XML). I download that to my PC and run Java against it. If necessary, I could even develop and test the Java code on my PC and run the application on the mainframe once it is working. (or use Co:Z to ship the XML to my Linux system and run the code there with the response going back to the mainframe). -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology Regards, Coen Wessels _ IBM Suisse Centre de Compétence Bancaire Av. de la Vallombreuse 100 CH - 1008 Prilly Téléphone : +41 (0)27 327 4271 Mobile : +41 (0)78 803 2621 IBM : +41 58 333 46 07 Fax : +41 (0)27 327 4255 Mon adresse IBM est [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
FTP from PTF.BOULDER.IBM.COM
Anybody having problems with using FTP from IBM.BOULDER.IBM.COM .Works ok from IE but times out on open from VM or Z/OS or from PC CMD . Our network chaps say 'nothing has changed' Crispin Hugo Systems Programmer Macro 4 This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security Service and the Macro 4 plc internal virus protection system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DB2 group by with date functions
Thanks everyone. Our DBA is on vacation and I noticed it is V7 (though I was sure that what I tried was in the SQL standard). I went with the view method. It was fine. Lindy -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bass, Walter W Sent: 17. kesäkuuta 2008 1:43 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: DB2 group by with date functions I don't believe this is quite correct. SUBSTR(), YEAR() and MONTH() are not column functions, they are scalar functions. I believe the problem may be that you cannot even use SCALAR functions in the GROUP BY unless you are in version 8 NEW FUNCTION MODE. Check to see if your site is on version 8 in COMPATIBILITY MODE? Bill Bass United Health Care Greenville, SC -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
It shouldn't matter too much for your PCI audit. The requirement is not really that each server has exactly the same time, as long as any time difference is fairly constant and is quantifiable. It's there really so that different server's system logs can be used collectively or in concert should some later investigation into something become necessary. If you can demonstrate to your auditor that you take steps to ensure that the mainframe clock does not drift too much and that you know what any time difference is, he should accept that, or at least note that a compensating control is in place. For example, twice a year setting the HMC system clock with some external time reference (even the Speaking Clock) and ensuring that your IPL'd systems pick up that changed time. You don't need to be second-accurate, as long as the difference is known. Brian -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chauhan, Jasbir Sent: 16 June 2008 20:03 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question As part of the PCI audit we need to look into adopting NTP (network time protocol) on the mainframe to ensure all of our 'systems' are synchronized. Can STP provide NTP client capability to maintain 'same time' across heterogeneous platforms. Hopefully, some one out there has a solution. I'll also contact IBM to see if how they have one. We are running on a z9-BC. - Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:38:30 +0100, Bri P wrote: It shouldn't matter too much for your PCI audit. The requirement is not really that each server has exactly the same time, as long as any time difference is fairly constant and is quantifiable. It's there really so that different server's system logs can be used collectively or in concert should some later investigation into something become necessary. If you can demonstrate to your auditor that you take steps to ensure that the mainframe clock does not drift too much and that you know what any time difference is, he should accept that, or at least note that a compensating control is in place. For example, twice a year setting the HMC system clock with some external time reference (even the Speaking Clock) and ensuring that your IPL'd systems pick up that changed time. You don't need to be second-accurate, as long as the difference is known. What are the guaranteed maximum drift rates of: o The HMC clock between settings with an external reference o The [E]TOD clock between IPLS in the absence of STP or ETR? (I suspect the vendor won't specify the latter, but will recommend STP.) Will this be acceptable to the auditor? -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT
Hallo To All, nbsp; I am trying to track down the reason why an ABARS dsn was expired.nbsp; I checked in the log and it shows the following : KEY DVTAU.2008164000101 WAS DELETED BY EXPIREBV ABARVSVERSION COMMAND, RC=0 ARC0681I EXPIRE ABARS VERSIONS ENDING AT 17;10:05 ON 2008/06/12. nbsp; The dsn was created at 07:10:52 Date 08/06/12 nbsp; My question is was this a manual command entered?nbsp; I checked the HSM startup but I didn't find any SETSYS commands which would issue the EXPIREBV. nbsp; If this command was entered by someone is there someplace I can look for the USERID? nbsp; Thanks Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address. www.yahoo7.com.au/mail -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Cloning USS files
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Myers Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 4:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Cloning USS files All: How do I go about cloning part of a HFS file system across LPARs? What I am trying to do is to copy part (one directory and all sub-directories) from one HFS file on one LPAR into an HFS file on another LPAR. The HFS file containing the desired directories is mounted as root on one file system, which is the downlevel system from which I am migrating. I want to carve out a copy of selected directories and files from it and put them into an HFS file that will be mounted and used on the uplevel system. What are the steps I need to do to accomplish this? Mike Myers When I had to do this, I used pax to create an archive of the files that I needed. I then ftp'ed the archive file to the new system and used pax to unwind the archive. 1) create a sequential file that is big enough to contain the archive 2) cd to the starting subdirectory 3) pax -osaveext -wvf //'sequential.dataset' . 4) ftp 'sequential.dataset' to the new system (if not on shared DASD) 5) logon to the new system to a UNIX shell (TSO OMVS will work) 6) cd to the receiving subdirectory 7) pax -pex -rvf //'sequential.dataset' There are other ways to do this, but the above is the simpliest conceptually. It is the UNIX equivalent of doing a DFDSS or FDR dump of the files and then restoring the dump on the new system. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Cloning USS files
John: Thanks. I'll give it a try. Mike McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/17/2008 9:16 AM -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Myers Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 4:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Cloning USS files All: How do I go about cloning part of a HFS file system across LPARs? What I am trying to do is to copy part (one directory and all sub-directories) from one HFS file on one LPAR into an HFS file on another LPAR. The HFS file containing the desired directories is mounted as root on one file system, which is the downlevel system from which I am migrating. I want to carve out a copy of selected directories and files from it and put them into an HFS file that will be mounted and used on the uplevel system. What are the steps I need to do to accomplish this? Mike Myers When I had to do this, I used pax to create an archive of the files that I needed. I then ftp'ed the archive file to the new system and used pax to unwind the archive. 1) create a sequential file that is big enough to contain the archive 2) cd to the starting subdirectory 3) pax -osaveext -wvf //'sequential.dataset' . 4) ftp 'sequential.dataset' to the new system (if not on shared DASD) 5) logon to the new system to a UNIX shell (TSO OMVS will work) 6) cd to the receiving subdirectory 7) pax -pex -rvf //'sequential.dataset' There are other ways to do this, but the above is the simpliest conceptually. It is the UNIX equivalent of doing a DFDSS or FDR dump of the files and then restoring the dump on the new system. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- The contents of this e-mail (and any attachments) are confidential, may be privileged and may contain copyright material. You may only reproduce or distribute material if you are expressly authorized by us to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email (and any attachments) is unauthorized. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and immediately delete this e-mail and any copies of it from your system. == -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Slow FTP transfer from z/OS to Unix
Do your transfer rate measurements include login time? If so, have you tried an interactive ftp to see how long the login is taking? If it is taking a long time, the login time by itself may explain your slow transfer rate, while the transfer itself may be working just as fast as a transfer to Windows. We had slow Linux ftp logins (30 seconds before we even got a prompt for the userid) which turned out to be due to three reasons: the ftp server on Linux was running under xinetd, not as a daemon; xinetd was issuing ident requests (port 113) back to the client machine, due to USERID being specified in /etc/xinetd.conf or the /etc/xinetd.d file for the ftp server; and port 113 traffic was blocked. I won't go into more detail, since I don't know if any of this applies to your situation. Bill On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:14:52 -0400, François Paré wrote: Hello, I'm running a batch job that does a FTP transfer from a z/OS mainframe to a LINUX server and the transfer rate is about 20K/sec. If I do the same FTP transfer to a Windows server I got a transfer rate of about 900K/sec. The mainframe OSA card is running at 100 Mb/sec full. Since the Windows and the LINUX server are on the same switch and got the same throughput capability I suppose that there is an optimal setting that is done automatically when the transfer is done with a Windows server but this setting is not done automatically with a LINUX server. I tried PASV but it didn't change the bad transfer rate. Could you tell me what this setting could be? Thank you! * *** Francois Pare -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
We have a problem. We have a very old CICS application which is written in HLASM and OS/VS COBOL 2.4. We want to convert the COBOL to Enterprise COBOL. We have having many problems due mainly to lack of knowledge about the code base. The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). The only way that I can see to do this is via the AMODE(24) parm in the Binder. However, we use CA-Endevor for our program compiles and links. This means that we need a separate Endevor processor which invokes the binder with the AMODE(24) parm. Any ideas about another way to do this which would not require a new Endevor processor? I don't know a lot about Endevor, but I don't see a way to use the Binder's MODE command. And I don't know if this would be easier to implement in Endevor than the PARM. P.S. I am not as convinced as the programmer that the problems he is encountering are due to the AMODE. But he is insistant and has the political backing to force the issue. The only way to prove otherwise to allow him to do his work in AMODE(24) and see if he still has the same problems. He has already done a lot of figure out this for me type requests to Tech Services. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
Ad hoc SMF reporting might be a good fit for Tivoli Decision Support for z/OS, with or without its various options (such as Usage and Accounting Manager) depending on your requirements. I believe CA also has something in this category. My guess would be some combination of CA SMF Director, CA JARS Resource Management, and/or CA MICS Resource Management. Macro4's ExpeTune does at least some SMF reporting. I suspect I'm forgetting other possibilities., SAS, of course, is quite powerful and offers a lot of general purpose flexibility. I'm quite fond of SAS having done some substantial econometric analysis with it. Arguably I received a better diploma thanks to SAS, so I guess I'm biased. I should ask if you've investigated a penalty box solution. A typical penalty box pattern is to have a disaster recovery system such as a 2096-A01 (z9 BC) or 2086-110 (z890) with Capacity Backup (CBU) protecting a larger (and often growing) primary system. You might have disk replication between the two sites/systems so that it's easy to shuttle SMF (and other) data over to the other site. (Bonus points for Parallel Sysplex or even some form of GDPS.) Quite often you'd keep N level hardware for primary production (e.g. z9 BC) and N-1 for disaster recovery/penalty box (e.g. z890). There are other patterns, and I'm also assuming here that SMF report processing is containable within a much smaller system capacity. Also, do you think the value of the SMF reports SAS delivers matches up with the cost? (How real is the problem, basically?) - - - - - Timothy Sipples IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect Specializing in Software Architectures Related to System z Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Japan and IBM Asia-Pacific E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports? Ad hoc SMF reporting might be a good fit for Tivoli Decision Support for z/OS, with or without its various options (such as Usage and Accounting Manager) depending on your requirements. I believe CA also has something in this category. My guess would be some combination of CA SMF Director, CA JARS Resource Management, and/or CA MICS Resource Management. Macro4's ExpeTune does at least some SMF reporting. I suspect I'm forgetting other possibilities., SAS, of course, is quite powerful and offers a lot of general purpose flexibility. I'm quite fond of SAS having done some substantial econometric analysis with it. Arguably I received a better diploma thanks to SAS, so I guess I'm biased. I should ask if you've investigated a penalty box solution. A typical penalty box pattern is to have a disaster recovery system such as a 2096-A01 (z9 BC) or 2086-110 (z890) with Capacity Backup (CBU) protecting a larger (and often growing) primary system. You might have disk replication between the two sites/systems so that it's easy to shuttle SMF (and other) data over to the other site. (Bonus points for Parallel Sysplex or even some form of GDPS.) Quite often you'd keep N level hardware for primary production (e.g. z9 BC) and N-1 for disaster recovery/penalty box (e.g. z890). There are other patterns, and I'm also assuming here that SMF report processing is containable within a much smaller system capacity. Also, do you think the value of the SMF reports SAS delivers matches up with the cost? (How real is the problem, basically?) - - - - - Timothy Sipples Thanks for the thoughts. However what I (and my manager) think is totally irrelevant. Upper managements wants to cut costs. They have targetted SAS as something that is not mission critical (and I guess it isn't) and so it can be eliminated. So let it be written! So let it be done! (some movie that I cannot remember - what the king said when he made a decree.) -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:52:32 -0500, McKown, John wrote: ... The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). The only way that I can see to do this is via the AMODE(24) parm in the Binder. However, we use CA-Endevor for our program compiles and links. This means that we need a separate Endevor processor which invokes the binder with the AMODE(24) parm. For testing purposes, I'd link edit the module outside of Endevor. That might mean that you have to link it into a different load library, but it would provide a simple test. -- Tom Marchant -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
So let it be written! So let it be done! It was Pharaoh in 'The Ten Commandments' Crispin Hugo Systems Programmer Macro 4 Thanks for the thoughts. However what I (and my manager) think is totally irrelevant. Upper managements wants to cut costs. They have targetted SAS as something that is not mission critical (and I guess it isn't) and so it can be eliminated. So let it be written! So let it be done! (some movie that I cannot remember - what the king said when he made a decree.) -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security Service and the Macro 4 plc internal virus protection system. This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security Service and the Macro 4 plc internal virus protection system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
Actually, as of October, 2007, System z's Server Time Protocol (STP) can act as a Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP)/NTP client in order to receive its master time. Your System z9 (or z10) is capable of that function if you get the STP option. You can visit here to start getting some more information: http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/advantages/pso/stp/ntp.html Also, I agree that it is highly desirable to have your mainframe act as the master (S)NTP server for your other servers and even PC/Mac clients. Let the mainframe be the highly available time boss if at all possible. See here for some setup information (for z/OS): http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r9/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zos.r9.halu101/sntpdinfo.htm So, in summary, you can use the STP feature to let the mainframe get a master time for your organization (via SNTP/NTP client support, such as by connecting to a dedicated GPS box that delivers its time signal via a closed NTP link). Then use the mainframe's SNTPD -- included with z/OS -- to keep every other server and client in sync. That'd be the preferred approach. - - - - - Timothy Sipples IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect Specializing in Software Architectures Related to System z Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Japan and IBM Asia-Pacific E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Outsourcing hits new low
On 16 Jun 2008 06:51:48 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John) wrote: I am somewhat confused by this as well. But I'll admit that I'm not an economist. I'm a computer techie. But as more things are done far away, that reduces the average and median income in the local economy. Which reduces the ability to make money in that economy. Eventually, it seems to me, the local economy will no longer be able to support itself and will collapse. I what the big boys hope to do is syphon off money in the interim and so don't care about the long term. That is one problem with globalization, in my ignorant view. And, of course, long term today implies beyond this fiscal cycle. Unlike the 3 year and 5 year plans of my misspent youth. On the other hand, the economy of New England didn't collapse when the textile industry moved to the South, and the economy of the South didn't collapse when the textile industry moved overseas. And if the poor countries remain poor, quite a few adverse consequences are likely to happen, varying from cutting down the rainforests, to over-fishing, to epidemics, to war. (Leaving out any ethical or moral parts of this analysis). I do agree that one of the big problems with this generation is a devaluation of the long term.Societies that believe in long term investment grow wealthy, while societies that don't believe in long term investment lag behind. When IBM sells computers and software around the world, the world demands to sell back. They have to, as goods and services are how we pay for goods and services - money is just a convenient way of handling that. We can't sell without buying. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
Could you/he contact the vendor and ask them the question? It seems to me that CA should be able to either point him in the right direction (since he is the one using the product, not you) or tell him it can't be done. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24) We have a problem. We have a very old CICS application which is written in HLASM and OS/VS COBOL 2.4. We want to convert the COBOL to Enterprise COBOL. We have having many problems due mainly to lack of knowledge about the code base. The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). The only way that I can see to do this is via the AMODE(24) parm in the Binder. However, we use CA-Endevor for our program compiles and links. This means that we need a separate Endevor processor which invokes the binder with the AMODE(24) parm. Any ideas about another way to do this which would not require a new Endevor processor? I don't know a lot about Endevor, but I don't see a way to use the Binder's MODE command. And I don't know if this would be easier to implement in Endevor than the PARM. P.S. I am not as convinced as the programmer that the problems he is encountering are due to the AMODE. But he is insistant and has the political backing to force the issue. The only way to prove otherwise to allow him to do his work in AMODE(24) and see if he still has the same problems. He has already done a lot of figure out this for me type requests to Tech Services. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Slow FTP transfer from z/OS to Unix
No the transfer rate does not include the login time. The login time is very short. We tried it interactively from tso and the transfer rate is as slow as in batch. Francois -Message d'origine- De : IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Bill Godfrey Envoyé : 17 juin 2008 09:29 À : IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Objet : Re: Slow FTP transfer from z/OS to Unix Do your transfer rate measurements include login time? If so, have you tried an interactive ftp to see how long the login is taking? If it is taking a long time, the login time by itself may explain your slow transfer rate, while the transfer itself may be working just as fast as a transfer to Windows. We had slow Linux ftp logins (30 seconds before we even got a prompt for the userid) which turned out to be due to three reasons: the ftp server on Linux was running under xinetd, not as a daemon; xinetd was issuing ident requests (port 113) back to the client machine, due to USERID being specified in /etc/xinetd.conf or the /etc/xinetd.d file for the ftp server; and port 113 traffic was blocked. I won't go into more detail, since I don't know if any of this applies to your situation. Bill On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:14:52 -0400, François Paré wrote: Hello, I'm running a batch job that does a FTP transfer from a z/OS mainframe to a LINUX server and the transfer rate is about 20K/sec. If I do the same FTP transfer to a Windows server I got a transfer rate of about 900K/sec. The mainframe OSA card is running at 100 Mb/sec full. Since the Windows and the LINUX server are on the same switch and got the same throughput capability I suppose that there is an optimal setting that is done automatically when the transfer is done with a Windows server but this setting is not done automatically with a LINUX server. I tried PASV but it didn't change the bad transfer rate. Could you tell me what this setting could be? Thank you! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24) On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:52:32 -0500, McKown, John wrote: ... The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). The only way that I can see to do this is via the AMODE(24) parm in the Binder. However, we use CA-Endevor for our program compiles and links. This means that we need a separate Endevor processor which invokes the binder with the AMODE(24) parm. For testing purposes, I'd link edit the module outside of Endevor. That might mean that you have to link it into a different load library, but it would provide a simple test. -- Tom Marchant I guess that we may need to do this. But it is going to be a nightmare! All the source is in Endevor controlled libraries. The load library in the DFHRPL is Endevor controlled. Linking into this environment outside of Endevor is another political nightmare. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Slow FTP transfer from z/OS to Unix
The port 113 was closed on the LINUX server. We opened it and did the test again but the transfer rate is unchanged. François Paré tél.: 4013 -Message d'origine- De : IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Wissink, Brad [ITSYS] Envoyé : 16 juin 2008 16:38 À : IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Objet : Re: Slow FTP transfer from z/OS to Unix We had a similar problem and found it was related to port 113 and firewalls. We had the ftp server on a Linux box and were using the client from z/OS. We ended up creating a rule to keep the Linux ftp server from sending to port 113 of the client. Port 113 has something to do with identd. Brad Wissink Information Technology Services Iowa State University 515-294-3088 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of François Paré Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 2:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Slow FTP transfer from z/OS to Unix Hello, I'm running a batch job that does a FTP transfer from a z/OS mainframe to a LINUX server and the transfer rate is about 20K/sec. If I do the same FTP transfer to a Windows server I got a transfer rate of about 900K/sec. The mainframe OSA card is running at 100 Mb/sec full. Since the Windows and the LINUX server are on the same switch and got the same throughput capability I suppose that there is an optimal setting that is done automatically when the transfer is done with a Windows server but this setting is not done automatically with a LINUX server. I tried PASV but it didn't change the bad transfer rate. Could you tell me what this setting could be? Thank you! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: FTP from PTF.BOULDER.IBM.COM
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:27:10 +0100, Crispin Hugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anybody having problems with using FTP from IBM.BOULDER.IBM.COM .Works ok from IE but times out on open from VM or Z/OS or from PC CMD . Our network chaps say 'nothing has changed' Crispin Hugo Systems Programmer Macro 4 Crispin, you can try a trace route from z/OS via the TSO TRACERTE PTF.BOULDER.IBM.COM address or via PC CMD via the tracert ptf.boulder.ibm.com command and see what you get. Then show this to your network chaps. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: FTP from PTF.BOULDER.IBM.COM
I thought that they are using ftp.emea.ibm.com now -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Lyon Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 10:38 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: FTP from PTF.BOULDER.IBM.COM On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:27:10 +0100, Crispin Hugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anybody having problems with using FTP from IBM.BOULDER.IBM.COM .Works ok from IE but times out on open from VM or Z/OS or from PC CMD . Our network chaps say 'nothing has changed' Crispin Hugo Systems Programmer Macro 4 Crispin, you can try a trace route from z/OS via the TSO TRACERTE PTF.BOULDER.IBM.COM address or via PC CMD via the tracert ptf.boulder.ibm.com command and see what you get. Then show this to your network chaps. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Poll about telecommuting
Corneel, I have not lost my skills of the heavenly language, I am only using the language of my opressors, for the benefit of Dermot. There is an requirement in our organization to be able to use characters like ê in CICS free text fields for French customers... Yet, the guy on the other side of the phone is sitting on Poland with a polish keyboard... That is globalization for you... Any ideas? Regards Herbie Elavon Financial Services Limited Registered in Ireland: Number 418442 Registered Office: Block E, 1st Floor, Cherrywood Business Park, Loughlinstown, Co. Dublin, Ireland Directors: Robert Abele (USA), John Collins, Terrance Dolan (USA), Pamela Joseph (USA), Declan Lynch, John McNally, Malcolm Towlson Elavon Financial Services Limited, trading as Elavon, is regulated by the Financial Regulator -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:21:25 -0500, McKown, John wrote: I guess that we may need to do this. But it is going to be a nightmare! All the source is in Endevor controlled libraries. The load library in the DFHRPL is Endevor controlled. Linking into this environment outside of Endevor is another political nightmare. Understood. But can you add another data set to the DFHRPL concatenation to test? -- Tom Marchant -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
Timothy Sipples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] om... Ad hoc SMF reporting might be a good fit for Tivoli Decision Support for z/OS, with or without its various options (such as Usage and Accounting Manager) depending on your requirements. I believe CA also has something in this category. My guess would be some combination of CA SMF Director, CA JARS Resource Management, and/or CA MICS Resource Management. Macro4's ExpeTune does at least some SMF reporting. I suspect I'm forgetting other possibilities., CA MICS requires that you have SAS. It is fully written in SAS. Kees. ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:46 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24) On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:21:25 -0500, McKown, John wrote: I guess that we may need to do this. But it is going to be a nightmare! All the source is in Endevor controlled libraries. The load library in the DFHRPL is Endevor controlled. Linking into this environment outside of Endevor is another political nightmare. Understood. But can you add another data set to the DFHRPL concatenation to test? -- Tom Marchant I'll take that up with the CICS person. We may end up doing that. Thanks. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24) Snipped Any ideas about another way to do this which would not require a new Endevor processor? I don't know a lot about Endevor, but I don't see a way to use the Binder's MODE command. And I don't know if this would be easier to implement in Endevor than the PARM. John, It's been a while since I worked with Endeavor, but ISTR there is (or was in that shop) a capability to specify binder control cards (in a separate library type that was an optional part of the source package) which would allow you to override the PARM AMODE value. I know I used it for a similar purpose as your programmer, to guarantee RMODE(24) and AMODE(24). Don't forget to tell the programmer to also use the Enterprise COBOL option DATA(24) if he is calling AMODE(24) assembler. Who is your Endeavor administrator? That person (the one who controls the Endeavor processes) may be more help here. In the shop where I used it the Endeavor admins were in the system assurance/operations control area. HTH Peter This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24) SNIP Any ideas about another way to do this which would not require a new Endevor processor? I don't know a lot about Endevor, but I don't see a way to use the Binder's MODE command. And I don't know if this would be easier to implement in Endevor than the PARM. SNIP Have the programmer do a call that causes a static link to an assembler routine that is AMODE(24) RMODE(24). This should force BINDER (unless your Endevor processor overrides it) to mark the resulting load module AMODE(24) RMODE(24). The assembler routine only needs to be a DC to create a table or some such. Regards, Steve Thompson -- All opinions expressed by me are my own and may not necessarily reflect those of my employer. -- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:52 AM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SNIP P.S. I am not as convinced as the programmer that the problems he is encountering are due to the AMODE. But he is insistant and has the political backing to force the issue. The only way to prove otherwise to allow him to do his work in AMODE(24) and see if he still has the same mu problems. He has already done a lot of figure out this for me type requests to Tech Services. Has he tried using DATA(24) in his Enterprise Cobol compiles? In my limited experience, that usually does the trick when calling old subroutines. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
[snip] Who is your Endeavor administrator? That person (the one who controls the Endeavor processes) may be more help here. In the shop where I used it the Endeavor admins were in the system assurance/operations control area. HTH Peter We do have a lady who is, as we affectionately call her, the change queen. She has consented to create a new CICS/Enterprise COBOL processor for this one function. So, no problem any more. Well, at least this is not a problem. I'm not sure what will happen if this RMODE/AMODE doesn't magically fix all the problems. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
You can use the Process Group parameter on the add/update panel. Don't know how it works internally, but we use it to specify MQ includes on linkedits for our cobol processor. Works reasonably well, but is sort of a PITA because I aways forget the name of the processor group if I go a long time between compiles - Original Message From: McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:52:32 AM Subject: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24) We have a problem. We have a very old CICS application which is written in HLASM and OS/VS COBOL 2.4. We want to convert the COBOL to Enterprise COBOL. We have having many problems due mainly to lack of knowledge about the code base. The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). The only way that I can see to do this is via the AMODE(24) parm in the Binder. However, we use CA-Endevor for our program compiles and links. This means that we need a separate Endevor processor which invokes the binder with the AMODE(24) parm. Any ideas about another way to do this which would not require a new Endevor processor? I don't know a lot about Endevor, but I don't see a way to use the Binder's MODE command. And I don't know if this would be easier to implement in Endevor than the PARM. P.S. I am not as convinced as the programmer that the problems he is encountering are due to the AMODE. But he is insistant and has the political backing to force the issue. The only way to prove otherwise to allow him to do his work in AMODE(24) and see if he still has the same problems. He has already done a lot of figure out this for me type requests to Tech Services. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Outsourcing hits new low
Hi Ron, My apology for the WTF stuff but as i told my NYC friend, without a DVR in each room at home, you miss a lot of the WTF stuff ex. I told him in Nov 2007, the Democratic nomination is over and he was still contemplating who to vote for. Never mind.. he is still ignoring me because of this stupid political race that is actually already OVER... We know who is going to win in Nov 2008. Quick explanation of the WTF stuff this morning : a) Viagra Stimulus check The check that is suppose to save the USA economy. The $600 that you will get if you filed your 2007 taxes in time and will boost the economy and make eveyrthing like it use to be in the 90's. Yes... not only are politicians cutting taxes.. they are giving it back , when they have a deficit. b) War Arsenal The Feds are pumping 12 Billion a month into keeping you safe... WAR money, bombs, planes, uniforms, American flags to your parents. Maybe more in renewing the strike capabilities of the Military. Initially, they wanted to stimilate the economy by giving it all to NASA and then they where going to renew all the roads/bridges in the USA... I know...I know... I have to get my self a hobby.. that what my Mothers says... Get off the computer and go and do something. It's so bad that they shipped Nucleur Missile war head to Taiwan accidently Accidently... but to save their embarresment they fired the Chief of the Navy. Never mind... get your self a DVR or two and then you can catch up with all the happening quickly while having dinner or breakfast. Note: Was watching George last night thanking Brown'ie for supporting his vision in helping him with money and troops in Afhganistan. Did you see who the SAudi's blamed for the high oil price after Banki Moon asked them to pump more oil because Europa is coming to stand still No, I know you did not because if you then see McCain's speech about what to do about the High Oil price, you have to laugh. Note: Technology is helping us understand whats going on around us but some politicians or people are not using it yet.. That is why people in Ohio and Texas voted for a loser. Never mind... My sympathy to those people in Iowa, Missourri, Wisconsin that are looking for Fed support for the Flood because they announced this morning, there is no more money. It's being used to build democracies some where else in the World. Anton On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:22:07 -0700, Ron Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anton, I can't sit in the senate. I've been a foreigner in every country I've lived in for the last 15 years. Best I can manage here is to be the Guvna. I'd be more than happy for my nieces and nephews in Australia and the Philippines to have a job in a call centre for a US company as they stimulate my family's' economies. I don't see a problem. Viagra Stimulus Checks, War arsenals, Nuclear bombs... WTF are you rabbitting about... Ron -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anton Britz Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 10:16 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Outsourcing hits new low Hi Ron, Yes, because the Viagra Stimulus Checks would then stimulate your own Economy, taxes, roads etc. (Check the mess Arnie is in currently.. Budget deficit wise but yes, I saw his wife on the Tim Russert show yesterday, talking from Sun Valley.. Ever been in Sun Valley ? ) Alternatively, you have to sit in the Senate for 50 years, to become a Chairman of an appropriations committee in order to channel a few Billion to your local Mom and Pop shop. Currently your local Mom and Pop shop needs to be manufacturing bombs to be able to pay the groceries. Note: What's going to eventually happen to all the bombs/Nuclear heads being manufactured because Cabella's can not sell them yet or my brother-in- law could not buy some this weekend. ( He farms in Africa and was impressed with the war arsenal you can buy in the USA stores. The computer stores are all closing down) Anton -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: FTP from PTF.BOULDER.IBM.COM
--snip--- Our network chaps say 'nothing has changed' ---unsnip- And another famous lie: The check is in the mail. Don't believe it until you've personally checked it out! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
-snip We have a problem. We have a very old CICS application which is written in HLASM and OS/VS COBOL 2.4. We want to convert the COBOL to Enterprise COBOL. We have having many problems due mainly to lack of knowledge about the code base. The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). The only way that I can see to do this is via the AMODE(24) parm in the Binder. However, we use CA-Endevor for our program compiles and links. This means that we need a separate Endevor processor which invokes the binder with the AMODE(24) parm. Any ideas about another way to do this which would not require a new Endevor processor? I don't know a lot about Endevor, but I don't see a way to use the Binder's MODE command. And I don't know if this would be easier to implement in Endevor than the PARM. P.S. I am not as convinced as the programmer that the problems he is encountering are due to the AMODE. But he is insistant and has the political backing to force the issue. The only way to prove otherwise to allow him to do his work in AMODE(24) and see if he still has the same problems. He has already done a lot of figure out this for me type requests to Tech Services. --unsnip- ISTR that if the program wasn't capable of 31-bit mode, the compiler wouldn't mark it that way. You programmer is full of something I can't mention here, in the interests of propriety. After Endevor links the program, run a separate step to re-link the program, assigning the same entry point. The second link should run just fine and you can mark it AMODE=24 and RMODE=24 via binder arms. ASnd when it still fails, you can point out to the so-called superiors that this guy doesn't really know sh** from shinola. He sounds like a very arrogant person, or very ignorant person. Either way, he needs to be put in his place. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
Bri P wrote: It shouldn't matter too much for your PCI audit. The requirement is not really that each server has exactly the same time, as long as any time difference is fairly constant and is quantifiable. It's there really so that different server's system logs can be used collectively or in concert should some later investigation into something become necessary. If you can demonstrate to your auditor that you take steps to ensure that the mainframe clock does not drift too much and that you know what any time difference is, he should accept that, or at least note that a compensating control is in place. For example, twice a year setting the HMC system clock with some external time reference (even the Speaking Clock) and ensuring that your IPL'd systems pick up that changed time. You don't need to be second-accurate, as long as the difference is known. Keep in mind that the TOD clock represents GMT (or UTC). Local time is calculated by adjusting GMT by CVTLDTO and CVTLSO. If the TOD drifts by a second or more, you can fix local time with a compensating adjustment to the time zone offset. See SET TIMEZONE= command. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
John McKown of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 06/17/2008 08:52:32 AM: We have a problem. We have a very old CICS application which is written in HLASM and OS/VS COBOL 2.4. We want to convert the COBOL to Enterprise COBOL. We have having many problems due mainly to lack of knowledge about the code base. The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). The only way that I can see to do this is via the AMODE(24) parm in the Binder. Compile with the NODYNAM option and you will get AMODE(24). Regards, John K -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Slow FTP transfer from z/OS to Unix
Francois, Could it be possible that there is a configuration mismatch in the router / switch that your Linux server is cabled up to? I seem to remember something about performance issues, when the server auto-negotiates with the switch and comes up with a setting of half-duplex, 10 Mbps when it should have been running full-duplex, 100+ Mbps. Have your network guys look into router / switch configuration for that particular port. Regards, Ulrich Krueger -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of François Paré Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 07:24 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Slow FTP transfer from z/OS to Unix The port 113 was closed on the LINUX server. We opened it and did the test again but the transfer rate is unchanged. François Paré tél.: 4013 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Outsourcing hits new low
OK... this is all related to mainframes how??? -- Rich Smrcina VM Assist, Inc. Phone: 414-491-6001 Ans Service: 360-715-2467 rich.smrcina at vmassist.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org WAVV 2009 - Orlando, FL - May 15-19, 2009 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
and/or CA MICS Not a good choice. MICS uses SAS. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:27:18 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote: Keep in mind that the TOD clock represents GMT (or UTC). Local time is calculated by adjusting GMT by CVTLDTO and CVTLSO. If the TOD drifts by a second or more, you can fix local time with a compensating adjustment to the time zone offset. See SET TIMEZONE= command. Gaah! Since Good Practice dictates that critical timestamps be kept in UTC (or GMT) your suggestion more conceals the problem of drift than fixes it. How will this affect the time reported by z/OS Unix programs which use time() to get UTC and strftime() to get civil time? How will this affect Java applications? -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
... The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). Why would anybody want to run in AMODE(24) in this day and age? As anybody told the programmer to get into the new millenium? - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
Okay. Sorry for resonding to my own post, but I never saw the original problem statement, until it was echoed in a subsequent post. I still believe AMODE(24) is passé, but now I know the reason. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -Original Message- From: Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:21:21 To:IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24) ... The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). Why would anybody want to run in AMODE(24) in this day and age? As anybody told the programmer to get into the new millenium? - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:08:42 +0900, Timothy Sipples wrote: Actually, as of October, 2007, System z's Server Time Protocol (STP) can act as a Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP)/NTP ... http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/advantages/pso/stp/ntp.html Hooray! Also, I agree that it is highly desirable to have your mainframe act as the master (S)NTP server ... http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r9/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zos.r9.halu101/sntpdinfo.htm So, in summary, you can use the STP feature to let the mainframe get a master time for your organization (via SNTP/NTP client support, such as by connecting to a dedicated GPS box that delivers its time signal via a Gulp. $$$? closed NTP link). Then use the mainframe's SNTPD -- included with z/OS -- to keep every other server and client in sync. That'd be the preferred approach. Now you must face the organizational politics. The group with the existing NTP server may not wish to relinquish its position in the pecking order, and argue, We were given the requirement to provide 5-second accuracy compared to NIST and 1-second agreement across the installation. We are meeting that requirement and operating successfully. Can you provide a business justification for spending $$$ to get accuracy 1000 times better than needed? They may be deaf to the argument, We're the best so we should be the master. By being in closer agreement with NIST, you may be perceived as violating established practice. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24) ... The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). Why would anybody want to run in AMODE(24) in this day and age? As anybody told the programmer to get into the new millenium? - He is convinced that parts of the code simply cannot use AMODE(31) without extensive rewriting, which he does not have the time or the knowledge to do. The assembler is very crufty and tricky in the bad sense of the word. Why can't I use RMODE(ANY), AMODE(31) with QSAM I/O? (rhetorical question - I do know why - this code may similar tricks such as using the high byte of a register for flags). -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Outsourcing hits new low
Well ... the relation is ... Anton. He has expertise in both mainframes and this stuff. On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:15:50 -0500, Rich Smrcina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK... this is all related to mainframes how??? -- Rich Smrcina -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT
John, I believe that an EXPIREBV ABARSVERSIONS command was probably issued - that is if you do not see this normally - and you do not show any other versions expiring. If you look in the syslog, where the command ran, you should be able to find who issued it. If it was a batch job you may need to look at SMF to find jobs that started at about the same time. ThanksRick -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dawes Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:04 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT Hallo To All, nbsp; I am trying to track down the reason why an ABARS dsn was expired.nbsp; I checked in the log and it shows the following : KEY DVTAU.2008164000101 WAS DELETED BY EXPIREBV ABARVSVERSION COMMAND, RC=0 ARC0681I EXPIRE ABARS VERSIONS ENDING AT 17;10:05 ON 2008/06/12. nbsp; The dsn was created at 07:10:52 Date 08/06/12 nbsp; My question is was this a manual command entered?nbsp; I checked the HSM startup but I didn't find any SETSYS commands which would issue the EXPIREBV. nbsp; If this command was entered by someone is there someplace I can look for the USERID? nbsp; Thanks Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address. www.yahoo7.com.au/mail -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Outsourcing hits new low
Rich, Ask me a computer question then ? or if you look at the Thread Subject line .. it's says Outsourcing hits a new low So, I will explain that for you : Outsourcing : A hot political issue that got Egg all over Hillaries face a new Low : An expression of degree relating to a 'Political hot issue' that you will be aware off, if you have a DVR. Note: i do not mind to explain , if you do not understand but most people work/vote/buy without even reading/listening/watching. Do your self a favor and go and sit at the entrance of your local Wal-mart and then you ask your self, how can these people vote for a leader. If you do not have a Wal-mart.. go to the local DMV office... Just go and sit there for 20 minutes and read your Unix manual or if you really want to do it the IBM way.. go to the Greenwich YachtClub and then you look at the CEO's house accross the river ,, while reading your Unix on IBM manual. Greenwich is in Connecticut. ( Little below Yale and above NYc ) Anton -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
IBM perks for Linux development?
I thought IBM used to provide perks to companies that were actively developing products on a Linux server. Was this true? If so, is it still true? If so, where could I find some information or a contact? If I recall, the reasoning behind it was to encourage companies to develop Linux based software. Thanks! David Logan Manager of Product Development, Pitney Bowes Business Insight http://centrus.com/ http://centrus.com 4750 Walnut St, Suite 200 Boulder, CO 80301 W: (720) 564-3056 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
There is ABSOLUTELY no way that you will get an Enterprise COBOL CICS program to work if it is marked as AMODE(24). All the IGY and CEE routines that it will need to run will have problems. You could get an RMODE program, but that isn't what you are asking for. If the programmer wants to force RMODE(24), then use the PROCESS RMODE(24) statement as the first line of the source code. This should This should work unless your compiler was installed with NOALLOWCBL How does the COBOL program access the HLASM program (or vice versa), EXEC CICS LINK? CALL literal or CALL identifier. Depending on the type of ILC has the responsible programmer read what IBM has to say about these. McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... We have a problem. We have a very old CICS application which is written in HLASM and OS/VS COBOL 2.4. We want to convert the COBOL to Enterprise COBOL. We have having many problems due mainly to lack of knowledge about the code base. The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). The only way that I can see to do this is via the AMODE(24) parm in the Binder. However, we use CA-Endevor for our program compiles and links. This means that we need a separate Endevor processor which invokes the binder with the AMODE(24) parm. Any ideas about another way to do this which would not require a new Endevor processor? I don't know a lot about Endevor, but I don't see a way to use the Binder's MODE command. And I don't know if this would be easier to implement in Endevor than the PARM. P.S. I am not as convinced as the programmer that the problems he is encountering are due to the AMODE. But he is insistant and has the political backing to force the issue. The only way to prove otherwise to allow him to do his work in AMODE(24) and see if he still has the same problems. He has already done a lot of figure out this for me type requests to Tech Services. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Fw: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
If it was originally compiled with DYNAM, it wouldn't work with CICS any way. It must already be NODYNAM. NODYNAM doesn't force AMDOE(24) unless an AMDOE(24) program is statically linked-in. John P Kalinich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... John McKown of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 06/17/2008 08:52:32 AM: We have a problem. We have a very old CICS application which is written in HLASM and OS/VS COBOL 2.4. We want to convert the COBOL to Enterprise COBOL. We have having many problems due mainly to lack of knowledge about the code base. The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). The only way that I can see to do this is via the AMODE(24) parm in the Binder. Compile with the NODYNAM option and you will get AMODE(24). Regards, John K -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: UR1 vs FIN
Roger Bolan wrote: UR1 is used for changes that are regarded as new function or some kind of improvement or enhancement that was not technically a programming error (close code PER) because the program was implementing what the programming specification had said it should do. It also means that the fix will be in a PTF for the current release. Pinnacle wrote: It's better than a FIN because the work's been done. I've had FIN's get lost before, and waited multiple releases for the fix. Based on what I learned here, I asked: |UR1 means the fix has already been coded and tested. Otherwise, it would |be FIN. Right? The response was ... | UR1 does not indicate that the fix has |already been coded and tested. It basically means that the problem will |be fixed but cannot be rolled back to earlier releases. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
With reference modification available, the only things that are awkward in COBOL are bit switches and the 1 byte binary fields. I have written usage programs that parse the SMF 14/15, 30 and 64 records. If IBM would just implement the data types in the 2002 standard including the new floating point usages as IEEE, COBOL the above caveats would go away and COBOL would play nicer with JAVA. COMP-1 and COMP-2 could be retained for hex floating point so a single COBOL program could have both types of floating point. YES there is a SHARE requirement for this. Java does not have Decimal Floating Point yet, and COBOL already plays very nicely with automatic conversion from Java float to COBOL float and back again with direct calls. In any case, it is off topic, there is no Decimal Floating Point data in SMF records that I know of. Cheers, TomR COBOL is the Language of the Future! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT
Rick, nbsp; Thanks for the tip.nbsp; I found the culprit - batch job which did the deed.nbsp; However, I don't understand why the dsn was expired even though the Management class has no limit and 999. --- On Wed, 18/6/08, Adams, Rick lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote: From: Adams, Rick lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Received: Wednesday, 18 June, 2008, 2:57 AM John, I believe that an EXPIREBV ABARSVERSIONS command was probably issued - that is if you do not see this normally - and you do not show any other versions expiring. If you look in the syslog, where the command ran, you should be able to find who issued it. If it was a batch job you may need to look at SMF to find jobs that started at about the same time. ThanksRick -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dawes Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:04 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT Hallo To All, amp;nbsp; I am trying to track down the reason why an ABARS dsn was expired.amp;nbsp; I checked in the log and it shows the following : KEY DVTAU.2008164000101 WAS DELETED BY EXPIREBV ABARVSVERSION COMMAND, RC=0 ARC0681I EXPIRE ABARS VERSIONS ENDING AT 17;10:05 ON 2008/06/12. amp;nbsp; The dsn was created at 07:10:52 Date 08/06/12 amp;nbsp; My question is was this a manual command entered?amp;nbsp; I checked the HSM startup but I didn't find any SETSYS commands which would issue the EXPIREBV. amp;nbsp; If this command was entered by someone is there someplace I can look for the USERID? amp;nbsp; Thanks Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address. www.yahoo7.com.au/mail -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address. www.yahoo7.com.au/mail -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT
If the command did not use a RETAINVERSIONS I believe it will remove it regardless of the management class. ThanksRick -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dawes Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT Rick, nbsp; Thanks for the tip.nbsp; I found the culprit - batch job which did the deed.nbsp; However, I don't understand why the dsn was expired even though the Management class has no limit and 999. --- On Wed, 18/6/08, Adams, Rick lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote: From: Adams, Rick lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Received: Wednesday, 18 June, 2008, 2:57 AM John, I believe that an EXPIREBV ABARSVERSIONS command was probably issued - that is if you do not see this normally - and you do not show any other versions expiring. If you look in the syslog, where the command ran, you should be able to find who issued it. If it was a batch job you may need to look at SMF to find jobs that started at about the same time. ThanksRick -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dawes Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:04 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT Hallo To All, amp;nbsp; I am trying to track down the reason why an ABARS dsn was expired.amp;nbsp; I checked in the log and it shows the following : KEY DVTAU.2008164000101 WAS DELETED BY EXPIREBV ABARVSVERSION COMMAND, RC=0 ARC0681I EXPIRE ABARS VERSIONS ENDING AT 17;10:05 ON 2008/06/12. amp;nbsp; The dsn was created at 07:10:52 Date 08/06/12 amp;nbsp; My question is was this a manual command entered?amp;nbsp; I checked the HSM startup but I didn't find any SETSYS commands which would issue the EXPIREBV. amp;nbsp; If this command was entered by someone is there someplace I can look for the USERID? amp;nbsp; Thanks Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address. www.yahoo7.com.au/mail -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address. www.yahoo7.com.au/mail -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT
I checked and the job had RETAINVERSIONS(0).nbsp; According to the doc and your help, this parmnbsp;if usednbsp;no versions will be retained.nbsp; Thank you for your help. --- On Wed, 18/6/08, Adams, Rick lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote: From: Adams, Rick lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Received: Wednesday, 18 June, 2008, 4:45 AM If the command did not use a RETAINVERSIONS I believe it will remove it regardless of the management class. ThanksRick -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dawes Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT Rick, amp;nbsp; Thanks for the tip.amp;nbsp; I found the culprit - batch job which did the deed.amp;nbsp; However, I don't understand why the dsn was expired even though the Management class has no limit and 999. --- On Wed, 18/6/08, Adams, Rick amp;lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]amp;gt; wrote: From: Adams, Rick amp;lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]amp;gt; Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Received: Wednesday, 18 June, 2008, 2:57 AM John, I believe that an EXPIREBV ABARSVERSIONS command was probably issued - that is if you do not see this normally - and you do not show any other versions expiring. If you look in the syslog, where the command ran, you should be able to find who issued it. If it was a batch job you may need to look at SMF to find jobs that started at about the same time. ThanksRick -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dawes Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:04 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: DFHSM QUESTION - EXPIREBV - URGENT Hallo To All, amp;amp;nbsp; I am trying to track down the reason why an ABARS dsn was expired.amp;amp;nbsp; I checked in the log and it shows the following : KEY DVTAU.2008164000101 WAS DELETED BY EXPIREBV ABARVSVERSION COMMAND, RC=0 ARC0681I EXPIRE ABARS VERSIONS ENDING AT 17;10:05 ON 2008/06/12. amp;amp;nbsp; The dsn was created at 07:10:52 Date 08/06/12 amp;amp;nbsp; My question is was this a manual command entered?amp;amp;nbsp; I checked the HSM startup but I didn't find any SETSYS commands which would issue the EXPIREBV. amp;amp;nbsp; If this command was entered by someone is there someplace I can look for the USERID? amp;amp;nbsp; Thanks Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address. www.yahoo7.com.au/mail -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address. www.yahoo7.com.au/mail -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address. www.yahoo7.com.au/mail -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
On 17 Jun 2008 09:29:32 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL) wrote: Why would anybody want to run in AMODE(24) in this day and age? As anybody told the programmer to get into the new millenium? We have some assembly language programs that are called to connect with cash machines that use AMODE(24). A consultant spent a couple of months trying to get around that limitation, but management said it wasn't worth fixing. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
We have some assembly language programs that are called to connect with cash machines that use AMODE(24). A consultant spent a couple of months trying to get around that limitation, but management said it wasn't worth fixing. Short term it may not be worth it but over the long run it would save a lot of headaches and money. Mangement has a bad tendency to only see as far as the next quarter and misses opportunities to resolve longer term problems. What are they going to do if this stops working down the road? Hire a super expensive consultant to try to fix it, if they can find one, that is. Jon L. Veilleux [EMAIL PROTECTED] (860) 636-2683 This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately. Thank you. Aetna -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Help in determining Maint UA39940
I need some guidance on how to implement this type of PTF. I am working on my first wave of z/OS V1.9 maint. So I am running z/OS V1.7 and z/OS V1.9 in the same plex will all shared dasd. Toleration maint is in place. I am seeing the following types of fixes for DFHSM. Does this mean I need to hold this until all DFHSM members in this plex are z/OS V1.9 or can I install it and over the next few weeks get z/OS V1.9 rolled out to all of my systems. This roll out will be completed by end of July. UA39940 DFSMS DSMShsm RESTART Use the appropriate started task name for each instance of DFSMShsm and restart in accordance with your local guidelines and procedures. Thanks for helping me in understanding the ramifications. Lizette -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:16:36 -0400, Veilleux, Jon L wrote: ... What are they going to do if this stops working down the road? Hire a super expensive consultant to try to fix it, if they can find one, that is. Sure, they can fine one, depending on what you mean by super expensive. There are a lot of people on this list who would gladly look at it for $300 per hour. Maybe even for less -- Tom Marchant -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
Thanks for all your responses. 2nd Level support too came back with the 'z/OS currently is not implemented as SNTPD client' response. However, they did add my name to the list of their 'Marketing database inquiries' for such a request. Apparently there are others who have made similar requests but the numbers aren't enough to get any consideration. The fact that it would require a design change would lead me to believe that there was no immediate plan to add this feature in the upcoming z/OS releases either. Unfortunately, the PCI standard is big on absolute statements such as Synchronize all critical system clocks and times and Verify that NTP or similar technology is used for time synchronization. Anything that does not meet the specified standards must have a compensating control that meets and exceeds the requirement. The assessor on-site, is here to both ensure we are in compliance with the PCI standard and to help us find solutions to help us comply. In our discussion yesterday he specifically stated that setting time manually has not been accepted by Visa in their review of similar PCI reports. Hopefully, we can come up with a compromise. Best Regards, Jasbir -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:27 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question Keep in mind that the TOD clock represents GMT (or UTC). Local time is calculated by adjusting GMT by CVTLDTO and CVTLSO. If the TOD drifts by a second or more, you can fix local time with a compensating adjustment to the time zone offset. See SET TIMEZONE= command. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Help in determining Maint UA39940
RESTART holds have to do with the steps needed to implement a particular PTF if the PTF is SMP/E applied to a running system. I ignore all RESTART holds, because I never SMP/E-apply maintenance to a running system. Instead, I apply maintenance to a new sysres, and then IPL to implement the maintenance, during a scheduled maintenance window when we can perform a rolling-IPL of our LPARs. If you implement maintenance via an IPL from a new sysres, you can ignore all RESTART holds. If you implement maintenance to a running system, well, good luck to you. Brian On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:19:51 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote: I need some guidance on how to implement this type of PTF. I am working on my first wave of z/OS V1.9 maint. So I am running z/OS V1.7 and z/OS V1.9 in the same plex will all shared dasd. Toleration maint is in place. I am seeing the following types of fixes for DFHSM. Does this mean I need to hold this until all DFHSM members in this plex are z/OS V1.9 or can I install it and over the next few weeks get z/OS V1.9 rolled out to all of my systems. This roll out will be completed by end of July. UA39940DFSMS DSMShsm RESTART Use the appropriate started task name for each instance of DFSMShsm and restart in accordance with your local guidelines and procedures. Thanks for helping me in understanding the ramifications. Lizette -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
I'm wondering if you've asked the wrong question to the wrong support group. Basic concept. In mainframes, Time is a hardware function. For this reason, setting the time is best handled at the hardware level. You have a couple of alternatives, depending on your hardware configuration. For Parallel Sysplex based technology, IBM has supported the 9037 Sysplex Timer for many years. The Sysplex Timer can dial out to NIST ACTS in Boulder Colorado for a time synchronization accuracy of something like 0.1 second or better. OR IBM has introduced a follow-on technology called STP which is built into the mainframe itself. This technology is enabled by ordering a feature code to be installed on the machine, and is available on z990, z890, z9 and z10 servers. STP supports dial out to NIST ACTS in Boulder, and has just recently been enhanced to allow the STP service to synchronize to a local or internet-based NTP service. So, to answer the literal question of an NTP Client for z/OS, the literal answer is STP syncronized to an NTP service. To answer the more broad-based question of making sure a mainframe system automatically has the correct time, the broad-based answer is any one of the above options. Brian On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:31:29 -0400, Chauhan, Jasbir wrote: Thanks for all your responses. 2nd Level support too came back with the 'z/OS currently is not implemented as SNTPD client' response. However, they did add my name to the list of their 'Marketing database inquiries' for such a request. Apparently there are others who have made similar requests but the numbers aren't enough to get any consideration. The fact that it would require a design change would lead me to believe that there was no immediate plan to add this feature in the upcoming z/OS releases either. Unfortunately, the PCI standard is big on absolute statements such as Synchronize all critical system clocks and times and Verify that NTP or similar technology is used for time synchronization. Anything that does not meet the specified standards must have a compensating control that meets and exceeds the requirement. The assessor on-site, is here to both ensure we are in compliance with the PCI standard and to help us find solutions to help us comply. In our discussion yesterday he specifically stated that setting time manually has not been accepted by Visa in their review of similar PCI reports. Hopefully, we can come up with a compromise. Best Regards, Jasbir -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
Paul Gilmartin wrote: On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:27:18 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote: Keep in mind that the TOD clock represents GMT (or UTC). Local time is calculated by adjusting GMT by CVTLDTO and CVTLSO. If the TOD drifts by a second or more, you can fix local time with a compensating adjustment to the time zone offset. See SET TIMEZONE= command. Gaah! Since Good Practice dictates that critical timestamps be kept in UTC (or GMT) your suggestion more conceals the problem of drift than fixes it. The whole point of using UTC (or GMT) time stamps is to avoid issues when the time zone offset is changed. For these logging applications, local time is irrelevant. How will this affect the time reported by z/OS Unix programs which use time() to get UTC and strftime() to get civil time? How will this affect Java applications? I don't know how z/OS UNIX programs compute local time. If they use a technique that does not rely on CVTLDTO and CVTLSO, they are already out-of-sync with the rest of the system. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
On 17 Jun 2008 12:17:29 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Veilleux, Jon L) wrote: Short term it may not be worth it but over the long run it would save a lot of headaches and money. Mangement has a bad tendency to only see as far as the next quarter and misses opportunities to resolve longer term problems. What are they going to do if this stops working down the road? Hire a super expensive consultant to try to fix it, if they can find one, that is. The long term solution is what's happening now - replace the system. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
What *do* you have? Do you have IBM 9037 Sysplex Timer? Brian On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:16:18 -0400, Chauhan, Jasbir wrote: Brian, As you others pointed out, STP is the key-word here. Maybe I should have made that clear at the outset - we don't have it. I was looking for alternatives -- and inform the decision makers accordingly. Thanks for all the feedback. Best Regards, Jasbir -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Network Time Protocol (NTP) client
Edward Jaffe wrote: Keep in mind that the TOD clock represents GMT (or UTC). Local time is calculated by adjusting GMT by CVTLDTO and CVTLSO. If the TOD drifts by a second or more, you can fix local time with a compensating adjustment to the time zone offset. See SET TIMEZONE= command. Actually the TOD clock represents STCK time. UTC time = STCK time - CVTLSO LOCAL time = STCK time - CVTLSO + CVTLDTO The IPCS LTOD gives a display of this which makes it easy to see. Of course you need to be on a system with CVTLSO set to see a difference between STCK time and UTC time. Regards, George Kozakos z/OS Function Test/Level 3 Supervisor -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
The z/9 cannot be a SNTP client, but there are hardware features to sync the z/9 hardware clock to a secondary or primary standard (NIST). That once was the now withdrawn sysplex timer and is now software loaded in the HMC. If your SMTP server is also in sync with NIST, then the requirement should be satisfied. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chauhan, Jasbir Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 2:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question Thanks for all your responses. 2nd Level support too came back with the 'z/OS currently is not implemented as SNTPD client' response. However, they did add my name to the list of their 'Marketing database inquiries' for such a request. Apparently there are others who have made similar requests but the numbers aren't enough to get any consideration. The fact that it would require a design change would lead me to believe that there was no immediate plan to add this feature in the upcoming z/OS releases either. Unfortunately, the PCI standard is big on absolute statements such as Synchronize all critical system clocks and times and Verify that NTP or similar technology is used for time synchronization. Anything that does not meet the specified standards must have a compensating control that meets and exceeds the requirement. The assessor on-site, is here to both ensure we are in compliance with the PCI standard and to help us find solutions to help us comply. In our discussion yesterday he specifically stated that setting time manually has not been accepted by Visa in their review of similar PCI reports. Hopefully, we can come up with a compromise. Best Regards, Jasbir -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:27 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question Keep in mind that the TOD clock represents GMT (or UTC). Local time is calculated by adjusting GMT by CVTLDTO and CVTLSO. If the TOD drifts by a second or more, you can fix local time with a compensating adjustment to the time zone offset. See SET TIMEZONE= command. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Cloning USS files
snip.. How do I go about cloning part of a HFS file system across LPARs? What I am trying to do is to copy part (one directory and all sub-directories) from one HFS file on one LPAR into an HFS file on another LPAR. ...snip Mike, You could create your new HFS and mount it temporarily on the downlevel system and then use 'copytree' to copy your selected directory/sub-directories. You should be able to get a copy of 'copytree' from the IBM UNIX Tools amp; Toys website but if you can't find it, contact me offline Hope this helps Roger -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Thoughts/Experience with migration from Serana Changeman to SCLM
If you have any real life thoughts/knowledge/experience regarding a migration from Serena's Changeman ZMF to IBM's SCLM change control products please pass them along. There are talks in the work here of possibly making this switch and I'd appreciate for any insights good or bad that I may share with management. Thank you. Bill -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Cloning USS files
Mike Do the LPARS share the same catalog for the HFS files ?, if so you can create a new HFS file mount it and use the Unix cp command to copy the files across cp -R /current /new/hfs/mount/point, once the copy has completed unmount the new hfs file. Go to the other lpar mount your new hfs and copy out whatever files/directories you need. If the lpars do not share a catalog, we use ADRDSSU to dump the file and the use ADRDSSU on the other lpar to restore the hfs with a new name, then mount it and you can copy out what you need. Regards Gerard Ceruti may the 'z' be with you -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Lowe Sent: 17 June 2008 10:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Cloning USS files snip.. How do I go about cloning part of a HFS file system across LPARs? What I am trying to do is to copy part (one directory and all sub-directories) from one HFS file on one LPAR into an HFS file on another LPAR. ...snip Mike, You could create your new HFS and mount it temporarily on the downlevel system and then use 'copytree' to copy your selected directory/sub-directories. You should be able to get a copy of 'copytree' from the IBM UNIX Tools amp; Toys website but if you can't find it, contact me offline Hope this helps Roger -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html _ Standard Bank email Disclaimer and confidentiality note This e-mail, its attachments and any rights attaching hereto are, unless the content clearly indicates otherwise, the property of Standard Bank Group Limited and its subsidiaries. It is confidential, private and intended for only the addressee. Should you not be the addressee and receive this e-mail by mistake, kindly notify the sender, and delete this e-mail immediately. Do not disclose or use it in any way. Views and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender unless clearly stated as those of Standard Bank Group. Standard Bank Group accepts no liability for any loss or damages howsoever incurred, or suffered, resulting, or arising, from the use of this email or its attachments. Standard Bank Group does not warrant the integrity of this e-mail nor that it is free of errors, viruses, interception or interference. Licensed divisions of the Standard Bank Group are authorised financial services providers in terms of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, No 37 of 2002 (FAIS). For information about the Standard Bank Group visit our website http://www.standardbank.com -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Single RES
Looking for some method to Clone/setup a Single RES rescue RES volume ... to include TCP as well as VTAM... Anything out there---freebe wise?? -- Email Disclaimer This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Single RES
freebe wise?? Not sure what you mean. Normally, you have libraries spread out on a few volumes for performance reasons. But on a recovery volume, you just cram everything on one volume and make sure the catalog and procs use the correct libraries. Are you saying your production server does not normally have TCP? Pedro Vera -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Single RES
http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html is the standard. Bob Ron Wells wrote: Looking for some method to Clone/setup a Single RES rescue RES volume ... to include TCP as well as VTAM... Anything out there---freebe wise?? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Syncsort Special Options
I am working with an evaluation copy of Syncsort, so I only have the Programmer's Guide, and not even an Installation Guide. It's been many years since I worked with Syncsort, so maybe someone here can help with my faulty memory. At one time, didn't Syncsort have a set of options that were managed via zap? I know the SYNCMAC options control the common options, but I seem to recall there being another set of options/defaults that were controlled via zaps. It seems like these options controlled things like what to do when the sortout dcb had one lrecl, but the outrec calculated another, and odd situations like that. Anyone recall - or have a manual? I understand the manual may be protected from public use, so I'm not asking for a copy. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Understanding ICH408I message
A user is seeing these messages in the joblog.ICH408I USER(USER01 ) GROUP(GROUP01 ) NAME(BATCH ID - APP. 7100) SL.D71.TPD1.SEQGDMR1.S2.C.SOUT(RBDMWTRC) CL(DIRSRCH ) FID(01C4C2C2F0F6F3003C070003) INSUFFICIENT AUTHORITY TO STAT ACCESS INTENT(--X) ACCESS ALLOWED(OTHER ---) EFFECTIVE UID(013444) EFFECTIVE GID(002100) ICH408I USER(USER01 ) GROUP(GROUP01 ) NAME(BATCH ID - APP. 7100) CCNECHK CL(DIRSRCH ) FID(01C4C2C2F0F6F3003C070003) INSUFFICIENT AUTHORITY TO STAT ACCESS INTENT(--X) ACCESS ALLOWED(OTHER ---) EFFECTIVE UID(013444) EFFECTIVE GID(002100) ICH408I USER(USER01 ) GROUP(GROUP01 ) NAME(BATCH ID - APP. 7100) CL(DIRSRCH ) FID(01C4C2C2F0F6F3003C070003) INSUFFICIENT AUTHORITY TO REALPATH ACCESS INTENT(--X) ACCESS ALLOWED(OTHER ---) EFFECTIVE UID(013444) EFFECTIVE GID(002100) ICH408I USER(USER01 ) GROUP(GROUP01 ) NAME(BATCH ID - APP. 7100) (*.C)=(LIB(DD:CLIB)) CL(DIRSRCH ) FID(01C4C2C2F0F6F3003C070003) INSUFFICIENT AUTHORITY TO REALPATH ACCESS INTENT(--X) ACCESS ALLOWED(OTHER ---) EFFECTIVE UID(013444) EFFECTIVE GID(002100) ICH408I USER(USER01 ) GROUP(GROUP01 ) NAME(BATCH ID - APP. 7100) CL(DIRSRCH ) FID(01C4C2C2F0F6F3003C070003) INSUFFICIENT AUTHORITY TO REALPATH ACCESS INTENT(--X) ACCESS ALLOWED(OTHER ---) EFFECTIVE UID(013444) EFFECTIVE GID(002100) I am trying to get an idea of what is going on, but really, the manuals are not too helpful especially for a 'catch-all' message like ICH408I. The meaning of the message implies that the job step is trying to traverse a unix library but it certainly does not appear that the names refer to a unix directory.I am not so much looking for a solution to they users' problem, more I am looking for advice on where to look to understand these messages. I have seen similar messages before, but the file or directory in question have always been fairly obvious in the message itself.Any advice ?Phil _ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
o Java's float and double primitives are (ISO) binary floating point, but has the java.math.BigDecimal class, which is a decimal floating point representation ( n * 10**m, where n is arbitrary length integer, m is a 32 bit integer). The BigDecimal class can be used to represent any zoned or packed data without loss of precision. o Recent versions of the JZOS toolkit (on alphaWorks, SDK 6.0, or soon on SDK 5) include type converter classes (com.ibm.jzos.fields package) that convert Cobol datatypes to Java values. BTW: These classes are pure Java code and don't rely on z/OS apis. o The RecordClassGenerator class (available in the alphaWorks version of JZOS) can be used to read the ADATA output from the High Level Assembler or Enterprise Cobol Compiler and generate Java classes which use the above converters to map DSECTS or Cobol copy books into Java classes. Samples are included which show how SMF 83 DSECTS are automatically mapped into Java classes. For example, the following JCL generates a Java class which maps the base part of the SMF 83 record: //ASSEMBLE EXEC ASMAC,PARM='ADATA,LIST,NOTERM,NODECK,NOOBJECT' //C.SYSIN DD * IFASMFR 83 END //C.SYSADATA DD DSN=ADATA,DISP=(NEW,PASS), // SPACE=(CYL,(3,1)) //* //JAVA EXEC PROC=EXJZOSVM,VERSION='50' //MAINARGS DD * com.ibm.jzos.recordgen.asm.RecordClassGenerator section=SMFRCD83 bufoffset=false package=com.ibm.jzos.sample.fields class=Smf83BaseRecord //SYSADATA DD DSN=ADATA,DISP=(OLD,DELETE) //STDOUT DD PATH='/home/user/Smf83BaseRecord.java', // PATHOPTS=(OWRONLY,OCREAT), // PATHMODE=SIRWXU //STDENV DD * ... // For the JZOS alphaWorks downloads, see: http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/zosjavabatchtk Kirk Wolf Dovetailed Technologies On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Tom Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With reference modification available, the only things that are awkward in COBOL are bit switches and the 1 byte binary fields. I have written usage programs that parse the SMF 14/15, 30 and 64 records. If IBM would just implement the data types in the 2002 standard including the new floating point usages as IEEE, COBOL the above caveats would go away and COBOL would play nicer with JAVA. COMP-1 and COMP-2 could be retained for hex floating point so a single COBOL program could have both types of floating point. YES there is a SHARE requirement for this. Java does not have Decimal Floating Point yet, and COBOL already plays very nicely with automatic conversion from Java float to COBOL float and back again with direct calls. In any case, it is off topic, there is no Decimal Floating Point data in SMF records that I know of. Cheers, TomR COBOL is the Language of the Future! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:57:39 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote: Paul Gilmartin wrote: On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:27:18 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote: Keep in mind that the TOD clock represents GMT (or UTC). Local time is calculated by adjusting GMT by CVTLDTO and CVTLSO. If the TOD drifts by a second or more, you can fix local time with a compensating adjustment to the time zone offset. See SET TIMEZONE= command. Gaah! Since Good Practice dictates that critical timestamps be kept in UTC (or GMT) your suggestion more conceals the problem of drift than fixes it. The whole point of using UTC (or GMT) time stamps is to avoid issues when the time zone offset is changed. For these logging applications, local time is irrelevant. You seem to be saying that for those logging applications the time stamp is a somewhat arbitrary parameter, increasing monotonically, but whose offset and drift from true GMT don't diminish its value. A point of using UTC time stamps is correlating logs from the z (e.g.) with logs from other systems in the enterprise, possibly in different time zones. If the OP's requirement includes agreement between UTC on the z and UTC on the other systems, fudging the local time offset fails to satisfy it. (I have long wondered whether correct UTC could be obtained by fudging CVTLSO. I have not heard of this being done.) How will this affect the time reported by z/OS Unix programs which use time() to get UTC and strftime() to get civil time? How will this affect Java applications? I don't know how z/OS UNIX programs compute local time. If they use a technique that does not rely on CVTLDTO and CVTLSO, they are already out-of-sync with the rest of the system. POSIX defines UTC as primitive, and defines a relationship from UTC to any other TZ (which can be chosen by the individual user.) If the offset from UTC to any of those zones is different from the POSIX specification, (perhaps by an arbitrary value in CVTLDTO), the system is out of sync with the rest of the industry. What industry-wide standard specifies reliance on CVTLDTO and CVTLSO? -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
I just wanted to CORRECT the erroneous statement that I made below. If an Enterprise COBOL program is statically link-edited with an AMODE(24) program, it will of course be marked as AMODE(24) - and will work that way. It still is NOT what I would recommend in this situation, but I did want to correct what I said before others worried about it. Bill Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... There is ABSOLUTELY no way that you will get an Enterprise COBOL CICS program to work if it is marked as AMODE(24). All the IGY and CEE routines that it will need to run will have problems. You could get an RMODE program, but that isn't what you are asking for. If the programmer wants to force RMODE(24), then use the PROCESS RMODE(24) statement as the first line of the source code. This should This should work unless your compiler was installed with NOALLOWCBL How does the COBOL program access the HLASM program (or vice versa), EXEC CICS LINK? CALL literal or CALL identifier. Depending on the type of ILC has the responsible programmer read what IBM has to say about these. McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... We have a problem. We have a very old CICS application which is written in HLASM and OS/VS COBOL 2.4. We want to convert the COBOL to Enterprise COBOL. We have having many problems due mainly to lack of knowledge about the code base. The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to force the load module to AMODE(24). The only way that I can see to do this is via the AMODE(24) parm in the Binder. However, we use CA-Endevor for our program compiles and links. This means that we need a separate Endevor processor which invokes the binder with the AMODE(24) parm. Any ideas about another way to do this which would not require a new Endevor processor? I don't know a lot about Endevor, but I don't see a way to use the Binder's MODE command. And I don't know if this would be easier to implement in Endevor than the PARM. P.S. I am not as convinced as the programmer that the problems he is encountering are due to the AMODE. But he is insistant and has the political backing to force the issue. The only way to prove otherwise to allow him to do his work in AMODE(24) and see if he still has the same problems. He has already done a lot of figure out this for me type requests to Tech Services. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
Paul Gilmartin wrote: What industry-wide standard specifies reliance on CVTLDTO and CVTLSO? I assume this question is purely rhetorical. Every system has its own variables that carry this information. These are merely the ones used by z/OS. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html