Re: How long for SMF to switch

2010-11-03 Thread Ed Gould
--- On Tue, 11/2/10, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:

From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Subject: Re: How long for SMF to switch
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010, 3:03 PM

Our process to offload the SMF data from the MAN files waits until all MAN 
files are full.  (Yes - I will be fixing that).

I've never worked in an environment that did it that way, so I won't comment.

So it forces a switch SMF between each step.
Because the MAN files are small on very active systems (Yes - I will be 
fixing that), any time I can save in switching will reduce the amount of time 
I am buffering SMF.

I'd suggest that you do fix the two above.
Then 1.5 minutes won't be an issue.
It's a symptom -- NOT the problem.

Ted:
As you probably know every shop is different and there are really no hard and 
fast rules. I would research (get record count) off the smf tape for each 
dataset and try sampling say over 6 months time (make sure you get the window 
in year end or anyh other time there is a lot of activity) and size ithem an go 
from there.
AT one shop I was in the programmers were terrible with COBOL. Example: when 
they wanted to go back to the first record they would close and re-open the FD 
(yikes) I happened to be out in the compouter room and noticed SMF address 
space was eating memory up so I had them start dumping. It never caught up as 
the program was creating the vsam open/close for evey record in the file. I 
finally had to do a force on the job. I read the programmer the riot act. I 
also called his boss squared to make sure that never happened again (it 
didn't). I suspect there were other similar programs flotaing around but did 
not have the volume og open/close that really hurt anything. If I had wanted to 
I could have gone back for a years worth of SMF to see but I had my hands in 
the burner for to many other items. I had the idea that the programmer did not 
have a clue on VSAM and got advice from someone else when he wrote the program. 
I asked that they send the programmers to
 class on COBOL but everyone was insulted that I asked.I am a fan of COBOL up 
to a point but frankly not enough education was not out there for typical joe 
programmer. IBM's cobol education was almost a joke but at that time Steve 
Comstock type was not out there or if he/she were they were silent. I had some 
input at that opoiny and the VP would have listened if had had a suggestion 
like Steve C.
Ed  




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: How long for SMF to switch

2010-11-03 Thread Sam Siegel
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:

 --- On Tue, 11/2/10, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:

 From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
 Subject: Re: How long for SMF to switch
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010, 3:03 PM

 snip


  class on COBOL but everyone was insulted that I asked.I am a fan of COBOL
 up to a point but frankly not enough education was not out there for typical
 joe programmer. IBM's cobol education was almost a joke but at that time
 Steve Comstock type was not out there or if he/she were they were silent. I
 had some input at that opoiny and the VP would have listened if had had a
 suggestion like Steve C.
 Ed

 snip

That is a truly sad story.




 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: WTO ABEND D23 help

2010-11-03 Thread Gerhard Postpischil

On 11/2/2010 2:33 PM, Charles Mills wrote:

I am not trying to do a one-shot multi-line WTO for the reason you
described. What a goofy design! It is perfect for someone with n
hard-coded messages but how likely is that in the real world? I don't even
know what my n is ahead of time. I am doing n one-line WTO's followed by
an E type WTO.


Goofy is in the eyes of the beholder. I have a number of STC 
and batch programs that use fixed ML WTOs to present help text 
or error responses to incorrect or incomplete modify commands.


Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Changing Data Class attributes

2010-11-03 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Don Williams donb...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:!!AAAYAIH+nruO4exAufAxNTnNpHSiggAAEK_uM5T8CYR
jlknq+vqwlkuba...@gmail.com...
 In chapter 7 of the manual, DFSMSdfp Storage Administration, it
clearly
 states that changes to data class attributes are not retroactively
applied
 to existing data sets:
 
  
 
 Not all attributes apply to every data set organization. When SMS
allocates
 a data set, it uses only those data class attributes that have meaning
for
 the given data set organization. SMS saves the data class name for
each
 SMS-managed data set. The actual data class definitions reside in the
SCDS.
 If you alter a data class definition, SMS applies the changes to any
new
 data sets that use the data class after you activate the changed
 configuration. However, SMS does not retroactively apply your changes
to
 previously allocated data sets.
 
  
 
 However, this does not appear to be entirely true. For example, it
appears
 that you can allocate a SMS-managed data set using a data class that
has a
 Dynamic Volume Count of 3. Then alter the data class's Dynamic Volume
Count
 to 2. You would expect the data set to able to expand to 3 volumes,
since
 the Dynamic Volume Count was 3 at the time the data set was allocated.
 However, it was discovered that the data set would only expand to 2
volumes.
 It appears that I cannot change this attribute without affecting
existing
 data sets. Of course, depending on what you trying to accomplish that
could
 good or bad.
 
  
 
 I ETR'ed IBM about this. They said that data class changes do not
apply to
 existing data sets; however, some access methods have undocumented
features
 which will may dynamically query data class attributes. At this point,
they
 are not ready to document it. Now, my question, has anyone discovered
other
 attributes or conditions where changing existing data class attributes
could
 affect (good or bad) existing data sets? Previous data sets that will
be
 recalled or restored after the data class change? 
 
  
 
 Don 


Don, 

Yes I discovered this too and it is partially true: you cannot change
the dataclass of a dataset, but some attributes of the dataclass will be
used at open-time, so changing these attributes will be noted on
subsequent opens of datasets with that dataclass.

We ran into problems with DB2 and received the following error:
IGD104I DB2TA.DSNDBC.DRCA02.XSGMNT2.J0001.A001   RETAINED,
DDNAME=A002289C
IKJ56231I DATA SET DB2TA.DSNDBC.DRCA02.XSGMNT2.J0001.A001 NOT ALLOCATED,
SYSTEM  OR INSTALLATION ERROR+
IKJ56231I DYNAMIC ALLOCATION REASON CODE IS X'04FC'

IEF020I DB2TDBM1 DB2TDBM1 TCT I/O TABLE SIZE EXCEEDS THE 16MB MAXIMUM.


04FC(1276)  Meaning: The request being processed would cause the TCT
I/O table to exceed the maximum allowable size. 
Application Programmer Action: If the job that received the message has
JCL DD statements that specify a high volume count, or the job that
received the message uses dynamic allocation to allocate data sets and
specifies a high volume count, reduce the volume count and rerun the
job. If the volume count is derived from the data class, use a data
class which has a lower volume count or contact the Storage
Administrator.
Storage Administrator Action: Reduce the volume count or dynamic volume
count specified in the DATACLAS.

Each time at open of a dataset the dynamic volume count value of the
dataset's dataclass is used to create controlblocks to be able to extend
the dataset. Chaning the dataclass's attributes will change the
controlblocks on subsequent opens of the datasets.

Here it is explained:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg3T165

It is not so much undocumented, as well as rather hidden in docs partly
related to SMS.

This is why I would like to be able to change the dataclass value of a
dataset. If a large group of datasets have a specific dataclass and you
want to change some dynamic attributes of the dataclass and it appear
that they are unfit for some datasets, changing these dataset's
dataclass to a more suitable class can solve problems.

Kees.

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij 

Re: How long for SMF to switch

2010-11-03 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:38:28 -0600 Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:

:I am currently working on rewriting our SMF Dump process.

:I was wondering on a quiet system, if I issue an I SMF command, about how 
long till the switch?  I am seeing about 1.5 mins from command to switch.

:IIRC, a job step has to end before the switch will take place. Or a TSO 
:session of STC must changes steps or end.

Not in my experience.

--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: How long for SMF to switch

2010-11-03 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Ed Gould wrote:

Example: when they wanted to go back to the first record they would close 
and re-open the FD (yikes) I happened to be out in the compouter room and 
noticed SMF address space was eating memory up so I had them start 
dumping. It never caught up as the program was creating the vsam 
open/close for evey record in the file. I finally had to do a force on the job. 
I 
read the programmer the riot act. 


I agree with Sam that this is a truly sad story.

For my part I had placed automation software to react on those messages:

IEC070I - Issue CICS CEMT to close the affected VSAM dsn. These 
programmers quickly learn to program properly.

DFHST0103 - Issue CEMT PERF SHUT, wait few minutes, then *Cancelling* of 
affected STC. Yup - CANCEL. You get it. Too bad - too sad.

IEE366*, IEE986E, IEE985A, IEE391A, IEE979* - Forcing of 'emergency' SMF 
jobs. Not really emergency, but this is to SHORTEN runtime of my daily SMF 
regular jobs. 

If you do not react to SMF problems, your system can grind to a halt. In 
antique days, my systems ran out of paging space. 

Ouch. ;-D

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ATTACH

2010-11-03 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In listserv%201010311434090886.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 10/31/2010
   at 02:34 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:

Would you have preferred the more legible lacunae?  (My viewer
corrupted the ligature.)

Probably because it does not support MIME properly. It seems to lose
the charset when replying.

That's just John G. at his finest.  Contributors more sophisticated
than the OP have earned the designation radically naif.

No, although they may have earned the designations radical naïf or
radically naïve.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Task Creation and Termination

2010-11-03 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 01cb789c$6eee3f90$4ccabe...@net, on 10/30/2010
   at 09:39 PM, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net said:

If I Attach a Task with a ECB parameter this ECB is posted by MVS
when the Subtask does a BR 14 to MVS 

Yes.

When this ECB is posted I do DETACH to remove the TCB 

After extracting any data you need.

If I don't code these two parameters the when the SUBTASK does a BR
R14 to MVS everything (TCB etc) goes away automatically 

These? You never mentioned the exit (ETXR) parameter. If that the
other one that you meant? The processing is similar.

Would there be any reason to code both these parameter

Examine storage owned by the subtask.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ATTACH

2010-11-03 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In
dc74548a025aff4a85f46926802a9b230555b...@chsa1035.share.beluni.net,
on 11/02/2010
   at 09:31 AM, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4)
peter.hunke...@credit-suisse.com said:

You'll surely gonna explain to me what intelligence has to  do with
the knowledge of a foreign language? Remember, there many people on
this list for whom English is not the native language. 

The programmers from other cultures whom I encountered professionally
did not have a problem with vocabulary. Their problems with English
were mostly in two very different categories:

  They frequently carried over grammatical constructs from their
  native languages.

  They failed to understand common idioms.

The types of errors that I'm referring to were not the result of not
having learned arbitrary rules, e.g., what preposition to use when,
rather than a lack of structural understanding or vocabulary. They may
be made by someone with a larger English vocabulary than a native
anglophone who would not make those errors.

In (probably) every language there are fine nuances in the  meaning
of words depending on context.

You can get in trouble even if you know those nuances, because an
idiom has semantics based on factors beyond vocabulary. Understanding
the individual words perfectly doesn't help.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ATTACH

2010-11-03 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In listserv%201011011924424160.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 11/01/2010
   at 07:24 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:

Google tells me for:

she is naive; he is naive

qu'elle est na ve, il est na f

I seriously doubt that. Perhaps you meant to have ï in there
somewhere, but your Content-Type: header line doesn't have a charset.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ATTACH

2010-11-03 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In aanlktik+d89dqf--v2hhv2eej1lpz-ybi1l9a+xji...@mail.gmail.com, on
11/01/2010
   at 12:05 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:

I like the US-English-International Keyboard setting on Windows /
Linux.

There's more than one US International mapping. The one that I'm using
doesn't have a dead-key A. It does, however, have a dead key for,
e.g., ~, as well as various alternate key mappings, e.g., Right Alt-E
gives me €.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ATTACH

2010-11-03 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 5359.87171...@web38903.mail.mud.yahoo.com, on 11/01/2010
   at 12:31 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca said:

What ever happened to 'look it up'?

That's fine in the classroom;difficult in real life.

Yes, it's much better IRL to release buggy code rather than hitting
the manuals.

If I had answers, I would have responded.

It would be better if you only responded when your answers were
correct.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ATTACH

2010-11-03 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 38a766e3736a439e8465c2a593dc1...@ownerpc, on 11/01/2010
   at 09:25 AM, Tony's FRONTIER account tbabo...@frontier.com
said:

But now I just wish I knew how to squash the a and the e together.

Use MIME, ensure that you have the correct charset in your header and
insert the correct code point for æ in that charset, e.g., 230 for
ISO-8859-1.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 Give me ligatures or give me death (Patrick Henry)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ATTACH

2010-11-03 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In aanlktik30g48+hed9wlpdkv=guy7l0efzhn41btzr...@mail.gmail.com, on
11/01/2010
   at 03:27 PM, Sam Siegel s...@pscsi.net said:

However, many people of Asian decent or whose native language is 
not of Romance origin (Hebrew, Arabic, etc.) have none of the 
context or background mentioned above by you.

Some of those speak and write better English than native anglophones.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


CPU capping is not working for one Lpar only on CEC?

2010-11-03 Thread Cobe Xu
Hi list,
We aim to cap the only active LPAR on the CEC(26 MSU) to 24 MSU.
But, I'm a bit confuse when I checked the RMF CPU Activity report as below,
which shows that with the interval, SYS2 was able to use up to 25 MSU.
(Highlighted)
So my questions are:
1. Is this because CPU capping is not working for only one active LPAR on
the CEC? If it's the case, any reference?
2. Or, this is related to the WEIGHT value we used to CAP? in our case, we
reference our CEC capacity is 26 MSU (about 171 MIPS), target to CAP 24 MSU
(160 MIPS).
. But, for client's sake, we use MIPS value as the WEIGHT,i.e 160. (as
highlighted in the report). And, this mislead the Lpar scheduler that it is
over 100% of the CEC. Thus,
  SYS2 can use as much as it needs.
3. Or any other posibility?
Pls shed some light, thanks a lot!



PAGE2
z/OS V1R8SYSTEM ID SYS2 START
08/17/2010-03.00.00  INTERVAL 000.59.59
 RPT VERSION V1R8 RMF   END
08/17/2010-04.00.00  CYCLE 0.100 SECONDS


MVS PARTITION NAMESYS2NUMBER OF PHYSICAL
PROCESSORS   4 GROUP NAME   N/A
IMAGE CAPACITY  24
CP2 LIMITN/A
NUMBER OF CONFIGURED PARTITIONS  5
ICF   2
WAIT COMPLETION
NO

DISPATCH INTERVAL
DYNAMIC

- PARTITION DATA -  -- LOGICAL PARTITION PROCESSOR
DATA --   -- AVERAGE PROCESSOR UTILIZATION PERCENTAGES --
   MSU  -CAPPING--  PROCESSOR-  DISPATCH TIME
DATA   LOGICAL PROCESSORS  --- PHYSICAL PROCESSORS ---
NAME   S   WGT  DEFACT  DEF   WLM%  NUM   TYPE   EFFECTIVE
TOTAL   EFFECTIVETOTAL  LPAR MGMT  EFFECTIVE  TOTAL
SYS2   A   1600 25  YES0.02   CP01.55.49.238
01.55.53.278   96.5296.57  0.06  96.52  96.57
SYS6   A100  0  YES0.02   CP00.00.00.000
00.00.00.0000.00 0.00  0.00   0.00   0.00
*PHYSICAL*
00.00.01.367   0.02  0.02

 -- -- --
  TOTAL 01.55.49.238
01.55.54.645   0.08  96.52  96.59


CFP01AH2   A   DED1   ICF   00.59.59.655
00.59.59.725   99.9999.99  0.00  50.00  50.00
CFP02AH2   A   DED1   ICF   00.59.59.666
00.59.59.708   99.9999.99  0.00  50.00  50.00
*PHYSICAL*
00.00.00.422   0.01  0.01

 -- -- --
  TOTAL 01.59.59.321
01.59.59.855   0.01  99.99  100.0


SYS8
-- 
Cobe Xu

Best Regards
---
zOS Performance  Capacity Analyst
E2E Performance Analyst
Email: cob...@gmail.com
---

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


z/OSMF install

2010-11-03 Thread Miklos Szigetvari

Hi

Try to install z/OSMF and WebSphere Application Server OEM edition 
for z/OS server instance have some problems
 and don't understand the role or the intention behind WebSphere 
Application Server OEM edition for z/OS server instance

Is this the future ?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OSMF install

2010-11-03 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
Yes, a lot of IBM's future System Programmer productivity tools will be 
incorporated in WAS OEM. It is their stated direction so those of us who have 
been around for a while will have to get used to it. Web-inizing everything is 
the trend and System Programming tasks will be following that path also.
Welcome to the brave new world.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 6:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: z/OSMF install

Hi

 Try to install z/OSMF and WebSphere Application Server OEM edition for 
z/OS server instance have some problems
  and don't understand the role or the intention behind WebSphere Application 
Server OEM edition for z/OS server instance
Is this the future ?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the
sender by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.
Thank you. Aetna   

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OSMF install

2010-11-03 Thread Miklos Szigetvari

On 11/3/2010 12:13 PM, Veilleux, Jon L wrote:

Yes, a lot of IBM's future System Programmer productivity tools will be 
incorporated in WAS OEM. It is their stated direction so those of us who have 
been around for a while will have to get used to it. Web-inizing everything is 
the trend and System Programming tasks will be following that path also.
Welcome to the brave new world.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 6:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: z/OSMF install

Hi

  Try to install z/OSMF and WebSphere Application Server OEM edition for z/OS 
server instance have some problems
   and don't understand the role or the intention behind WebSphere Application 
Server OEM edition for z/OS server instance
Is this the future ?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the
sender by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.
Thank you. Aetna

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Hi

At last not alone.

Maybe the WebSphere Application Server OEM edition for z/OS server 
instance is to brave for me.
Seriously a large number of unknown components,  programs,  scripts etc 
has installed for this server, and maybe the larger challange to manage 
this server, as to manage by this the system .
Do they asked/involved somebody with sysprog experience during the 
planning?


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OSMF install

2010-11-03 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
They involved folks in the planning for the functionality but not necessarily 
the installation (other than an ESP program). I agree that the installation 
process needs to be simplified and made comprehendible to System Programmers 
not familiar with WAS. The current method is convoluted at best and expects us 
to know esoteric settings that are specific to WAS. 
Good luck

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 7:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z/OSMF install

On 11/3/2010 12:13 PM, Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
 Yes, a lot of IBM's future System Programmer productivity tools will be 
 incorporated in WAS OEM. It is their stated direction so those of us who have 
 been around for a while will have to get used to it. Web-inizing everything 
 is the trend and System Programming tasks will be following that path also.
 Welcome to the brave new world.

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On 
 Behalf Of Miklos Szigetvari
 Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 6:59 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Subject: z/OSMF install

 Hi

   Try to install z/OSMF and WebSphere Application Server OEM edition for 
 z/OS server instance have some problems
and don't understand the role or the intention behind WebSphere 
 Application Server OEM edition for z/OS server instance
 Is this the future ?

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
 email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO 
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
 This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you 
 think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender 
 by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.
 Thank you. Aetna

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
 email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO 
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Hi

At last not alone.

Maybe the WebSphere Application Server OEM edition for z/OS server instance 
is to brave for me.
Seriously a large number of unknown components,  programs,  scripts etc has 
installed for this server, and maybe the larger challange to manage this 
server, as to manage by this the system .
Do they asked/involved somebody with sysprog experience during the planning?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the
sender by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.
Thank you. Aetna   

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: The replication feature.

2010-11-03 Thread Bill Fairchild
Shai has said that he understands what the Read Count, Search Key Equal, TIC 
*-16 loop is doing.  His problem is that when simulating how that sequence 
works, he cannot know, without also reading the tracks involved (which for 
performance reasons he doesn't want to do) which track, if any, has the key 
that will cause the loop to end, which will then presumably be the only track 
in the range of tracks being searched that will be accessed by a write command 
coming after the search/TIC pair.  Thus he cannot know which track to 
replicate.  One way to solve this problem is to replicate all the tracks within 
the range being searched, which will depend on whether the chain is operating 
in CKD or ECKD mode and also on the current file mask.

When in CKD mode, the maximum number of tracks that can be in a multi-track 
search operation is however many tracks constitute one full cylinder.  When in 
ECKD mode, the maximum number of tracks that can be accessed in any multi-track 
operation is always two, the track where the operation begins and one track 
beyond that.  In all these cases, if the search fails after accessing all 
possible tracks in the range allowed, the channel program will end with a 
Record Not Found error, which may then cause the operating system to redrive 
the channel program on a new cylinder or a new range of tracks.  Presumably his 
code would also intercept such a redrive operation with the new range of tracks 
visible.

The problem here is that a very large number of tracks may have to be searched 
before the search command is successful, and he doesn't want to have to 
replicate any more tracks than have really been changed by a write command 
coming immediately after the Search/TIC.  A real DASD will never have more than 
one track written to, but Shai's difficulty lies in knowing which one track to 
replicate.

Bill Fairchild
Rocket Software

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Rick Fochtman
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 7:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: The replication feature.

On real hardware, the READ_COUNT will give you the address of the record 
whose key is being compared by the next CCW. It's a sequence that is 
heavily used in searches of non-indexed VTOCs.

Rick
--
shai hess wrote:

Yes, I know it and I support it.
But be aware that I can not see the result of the READ_COUNT because I take
control before the IO is really done to the real device.

Shai

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:

  

---snip---


A few words on replication.


The standard replication is sending CCWS to all controller which
have mirrors disks. Sometime controller send data to other controller to
sync the data between all of them.
In this process each controller emulates the CCWS and by that create the
same data as the source disk. In this case the search key is very easy to
implement.

MFNetDisk because of the slow media of TCP do something else. It is
analyze
the CCW in memory without accessing the source disk data. That is why it
is
hard to process the search key without access the data in the disk. After
process the CCW it is decide what tracks need to be ReSync in the mirrors
of
the source disks. This process is complicate process especially for search
key CCW. Using this processing, MFNetDisk never block the real disk but
the
minus is that this is ASync processing meaning that if there is crash in
MF,
the mirror may be not fully Sync with the source disk. the MFNetDisk
replication can be good if you want to create Sync point or backup of the
real disk in specific time where you can validate that the process of
ReSync
is done completely without updating the source disks for short time until
the ReSync is totally over. This is called Sync Point where the mirrors is
fully Sync with the real disk.

About the MFNetDisk emulation. Each CCW is sent to the PC which access the
data in the emulate disks and easily can process any CCW include serach
key
and all other CCWS.


  

---unsnip-
Shai, it's entirely acceptyable to use a READ COUNT CCW before the SEARCH
KEY HIGH-OR-EQUAL CCW.

READ COUNT
SEARCH KEY HIGH-OR-EQUAL
TIC *-16 (Back to the READ COUNT
READY DATA (or WRITE DATA, as needed)

Rick


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the 

Re: ATTACH

2010-11-03 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg

At 12:17 -0400 on 11/02/2010, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about Re: ATTACH:


You can get in trouble even if you know those nuances, because an
idiom has semantics based on factors beyond vocabulary. Understanding
the individual words perfectly doesn't help.


There is also the issue that words pick up extra meanings over time 
and thus the same sentence can have different meanings based on when 
it was used or the intended connotation of the definition word. There 
is also the case of regional word definitions and the use of 
different words for the same concept. English terms as opposed to US 
terms are an example. UK English uses Bonnet and Boot where US 
English uses Hood and Trunk (for car parts).


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ATTACH

2010-11-03 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
Not to mention the difference in the meaning of Bootie

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Robert A. Rosenberg
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 8:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ATTACH

At 12:17 -0400 on 11/02/2010, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about Re: ATTACH:

You can get in trouble even if you know those nuances, because an idiom 
has semantics based on factors beyond vocabulary. Understanding the 
individual words perfectly doesn't help.

There is also the issue that words pick up extra meanings over time and thus 
the same sentence can have different meanings based on when it was used or the 
intended connotation of the definition word. There is also the case of regional 
word definitions and the use of different words for the same concept. English 
terms as opposed to US terms are an example. UK English uses Bonnet and Boot 
where US English uses Hood and Trunk (for car parts).

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the
sender by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.
Thank you. Aetna   

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ATTACH

2010-11-03 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Robert A. Rosenbergwrote:

... English uses Hood and Trunk (for car parts).

Time to put a Hood over this thread and place it in the Trunk.

;-D

I'm not talking about car parts ...

'Hood' - Think of that little girlie, Red Riding Hood who disturbed that little 
wolfie while he is trying to p** before eating innocent girlies and grannys. ;-D

'Trunk' - A large packing case or box that clasps shut, used as luggage or for 
storage.


Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: The replication feature.

2010-11-03 Thread shai hess
That is true. If I can not be sure about a specific track I will take the
worse case. That can be until one cylinder.
The simulator is many thousands of code and I made it the best and the
efficient I can.

Good point Bill.

Shai

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Bill Fairchild bi...@mainstar.com wrote:

 Shai has said that he understands what the Read Count, Search Key Equal,
 TIC *-16 loop is doing.  His problem is that when simulating how that
 sequence works, he cannot know, without also reading the tracks involved
 (which for performance reasons he doesn't want to do) which track, if any,
 has the key that will cause the loop to end, which will then presumably be
 the only track in the range of tracks being searched that will be accessed
 by a write command coming after the search/TIC pair.  Thus he cannot know
 which track to replicate.  One way to solve this problem is to replicate all
 the tracks within the range being searched, which will depend on whether the
 chain is operating in CKD or ECKD mode and also on the current file mask.

 When in CKD mode, the maximum number of tracks that can be in a multi-track
 search operation is however many tracks constitute one full cylinder.  When
 in ECKD mode, the maximum number of tracks that can be accessed in any
 multi-track operation is always two, the track where the operation begins
 and one track beyond that.  In all these cases, if the search fails after
 accessing all possible tracks in the range allowed, the channel program will
 end with a Record Not Found error, which may then cause the operating system
 to redrive the channel program on a new cylinder or a new range of tracks.
  Presumably his code would also intercept such a redrive operation with the
 new range of tracks visible.

 The problem here is that a very large number of tracks may have to be
 searched before the search command is successful, and he doesn't want to
 have to replicate any more tracks than have really been changed by a write
 command coming immediately after the Search/TIC.  A real DASD will never
 have more than one track written to, but Shai's difficulty lies in knowing
 which one track to replicate.

 Bill Fairchild
 Rocket Software

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
 Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
 Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 7:33 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Subject: Re: The replication feature.

 On real hardware, the READ_COUNT will give you the address of the record
 whose key is being compared by the next CCW. It's a sequence that is
 heavily used in searches of non-indexed VTOCs.

 Rick
 --
 shai hess wrote:

 Yes, I know it and I support it.
 But be aware that I can not see the result of the READ_COUNT because I
 take
 control before the IO is really done to the real device.
 
 Shai
 
 On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
 
 
 

 ---snip---
 
 
 A few words on replication.
 
 
 The standard replication is sending CCWS to all controller which
 have mirrors disks. Sometime controller send data to other controller to
 sync the data between all of them.
 In this process each controller emulates the CCWS and by that create the
 same data as the source disk. In this case the search key is very easy
 to
 implement.
 
 MFNetDisk because of the slow media of TCP do something else. It is
 analyze
 the CCW in memory without accessing the source disk data. That is why it
 is
 hard to process the search key without access the data in the disk.
 After
 process the CCW it is decide what tracks need to be ReSync in the
 mirrors
 of
 the source disks. This process is complicate process especially for
 search
 key CCW. Using this processing, MFNetDisk never block the real disk but
 the
 minus is that this is ASync processing meaning that if there is crash in
 MF,
 the mirror may be not fully Sync with the source disk. the MFNetDisk
 replication can be good if you want to create Sync point or backup of
 the
 real disk in specific time where you can validate that the process of
 ReSync
 is done completely without updating the source disks for short time
 until
 the ReSync is totally over. This is called Sync Point where the mirrors
 is
 fully Sync with the real disk.
 
 About the MFNetDisk emulation. Each CCW is sent to the PC which access
 the
 data in the emulate disks and easily can process any CCW include serach
 key
 and all other CCWS.
 
 
 
 

 ---unsnip-
 Shai, it's entirely acceptyable to use a READ COUNT CCW before the SEARCH
 KEY HIGH-OR-EQUAL CCW.
 
 READ COUNT
 SEARCH KEY HIGH-OR-EQUAL
 TIC *-16 (Back to the READ COUNT
 READY DATA (or WRITE DATA, as needed)
 
 Rick
 
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive 

initiator

2010-11-03 Thread Carroll, William
Good morning all. I have a problem I would like to put out here and see if 
anybody else has seen it.  The last couple of days I am having a batch job 
issue the message 'ief099i' waiting for datasets.  The wait is being caused by 
an initiator that has not freed a dataset.  In last night's case a job executed 
at 21:30 and ended successfully.  The other job started to execute at 23:45 and 
issued the message.  The local fix is to purge the initiator of the job that is 
holding the dsn.

Thank YOU

Bill Carroll
CICS Systems Programmer\
Grange Insurance
carro...@grangeinsurance.com







DISCLAIMER:
The information contained in this message may be privileged
or confidential and is protected from disclosure. If the 
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or 
an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message 
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the 
message and deleting it from your computer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA-TPX and SMF question

2010-11-03 Thread Kirk Talman
2 decades ago, when I was a TPX developer, they were SaveAreaControlBlock. 
 They were getmained at startup below the line and chained together.  They 
contained a savearea and two 6 word workareas used by variable management. 
 The available chain was anchored in the SMRT or the SMRT extension.

I had code to move some of them above the line and to create stacks but it 
was never implemented before CA bought out Legent.

There should be an TPXOPER command that gives you what you want.

For building exits, is there a macro for the SMRT?

Oh how I wish we used TPX here.  Switch has bugs I remember fixing in TPX.

IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 10/28/2010 
05:23:16 PM:

 From: Pommier, Rex R. rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com

 Hi list,

 I can't find the answer in the CA documentation (or on Google) so I 
 thought I'd come here.  In the TPX SMF records -specifically the 
 interval and shutdown records - there is a section that has SACB 
 statistics.  It has 2 fields in it, current SACBs in use and the 
 SACB high water mark.  Can somebody tell me just what the SACB is?

 What I'm actually looking for is something that tells me the maximum
 number of concurrent users of one of the applications I have defined
 to TPX.  If I can't get that, the max number of terminal sessions 
 signed onto TPX concurrently.  I'm hoping the SACB field is the 
 latter of these.

 TIA.

 Rex


-
The information contained in this communication (including any
attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the
personal and confidential use of the individual or entity to whom
it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
communication in error and that any review, dissemination, copying,
or unauthorized use of this information, or the taking of any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original
message. Thank you 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA-TPX and SMF question

2010-11-03 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Hi Kirk, and others,

Yes, TPX has a macro to define the SMRT.  The documentation (systems 
programmer's guide) also has layouts of the SMF records.  The doc talks about 
fields called MONSACBC and MONSACBH, defined as current SACBs and SACB high 
water mark.  Unfortunately, that's the extent of the definitions.  Hence my 
question to the group.

Also, yes, there is a TPXOPER command that will give me a snapshot of what I 
want.  But since we are looking for trending information rather than a one-time 
snapshot, I needed something that wouldn't require me to sit at a terminal and 
keep hitting the enter key to get me the info.

A developer from CA contacted me offline and gave me a much better definition 
of what the SACB is and what it does.  The information he gave me showed me 
that I was looking in the wrong place, and he then pointed me to a different 
SMF record that did give me the info I was looking for.  In the session 
interval record, there is a field called M9UCNT that shows the number of 
sessions currently attached to an application.  It gave me the info I needed, 
once I turned on interval recording.  :-)

Rex

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Kirk Talman
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA-TPX and SMF question

2 decades ago, when I was a TPX developer, they were SaveAreaControlBlock.
 They were getmained at startup below the line and chained together.  They
contained a savearea and two 6 word workareas used by variable management.
 The available chain was anchored in the SMRT or the SMRT extension.

I had code to move some of them above the line and to create stacks but it
was never implemented before CA bought out Legent.

There should be an TPXOPER command that gives you what you want.

For building exits, is there a macro for the SMRT?

Oh how I wish we used TPX here.  Switch has bugs I remember fixing in TPX.

IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 10/28/2010
05:23:16 PM:

 From: Pommier, Rex R. rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com

 Hi list,

 I can't find the answer in the CA documentation (or on Google) so I
 thought I'd come here.  In the TPX SMF records -specifically the
 interval and shutdown records - there is a section that has SACB
 statistics.  It has 2 fields in it, current SACBs in use and the
 SACB high water mark.  Can somebody tell me just what the SACB is?

 What I'm actually looking for is something that tells me the maximum
 number of concurrent users of one of the applications I have defined
 to TPX.  If I can't get that, the max number of terminal sessions
 signed onto TPX concurrently.  I'm hoping the SACB field is the
 latter of these.

 TIA.

 Rex


-
The information contained in this communication (including any
attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the
personal and confidential use of the individual or entity to whom
it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
communication in error and that any review, dissemination, copying,
or unauthorized use of this information, or the taking of any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original
message. Thank you

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

The information contained in this e-mail may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information and is intended for the sole use of the intended 
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please reply to 
sender and destroy or delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


OMEGAMON Manuals and 410 z196 Support

2010-11-03 Thread George Henke
Where can I find OMEGAMON manuals?

They do not seem to be available on the IBM web site
Also OMEGAMON 420 has z196 support, but how about OMEGAMON 410?

-- 
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OMEGAMON Manuals and 410 z196 Support

2010-11-03 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Not sure if this will get you there - as I don't know what Omegamon manuals 
you're looking for...

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/tdmktlist.html


Rex

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
George Henke
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 10:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: OMEGAMON Manuals and 410 z196 Support

Where can I find OMEGAMON manuals?

They do not seem to be available on the IBM web site
Also OMEGAMON 420 has z196 support, but how about OMEGAMON 410?

--
George Henke
(C) 845 401 5614

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

The information contained in this e-mail may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information and is intended for the sole use of the intended 
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please reply to 
sender and destroy or delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: initiator

2010-11-03 Thread Brian Kennelly
Do you have any exits that allocate datasets?

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 07:03, Carroll, William carro...@grangeinsurance.com
 wrote:

 Good morning all. I have a problem I would like to put out here and see if
 anybody else has seen it.  The last couple of days I am having a batch job
 issue the message 'ief099i' waiting for datasets.  The wait is being caused
 by an initiator that has not freed a dataset.  In last night's case a job
 executed at 21:30 and ended successfully.  The other job started to execute
 at 23:45 and issued the message.  The local fix is to purge the initiator of
 the job that is holding the dsn.

 Thank YOU

 Bill Carroll
 CICS Systems Programmer\
 Grange Insurance
 carro...@grangeinsurance.com







 DISCLAIMER:
 The information contained in this message may be privileged
 or confidential and is protected from disclosure. If the
 reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or
 an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message
 to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
 dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
 is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
 in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the
 message and deleting it from your computer.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: initiator

2010-11-03 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
Is the dataset that is in question in the JCL of the first job? Are there any 
hints in that job's allocation messages? 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Carroll, William
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 10:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: initiator

Good morning all. I have a problem I would like to put out here and see if 
anybody else has seen it.  The last couple of days I am having a batch job 
issue the message 'ief099i' waiting for datasets.  The wait is being caused by 
an initiator that has not freed a dataset.  In last night's case a job executed 
at 21:30 and ended successfully.  The other job started to execute at 23:45 and 
issued the message.  The local fix is to purge the initiator of the job that is 
holding the dsn.

Thank YOU

Bill Carroll
CICS Systems Programmer\
Grange Insurance
carro...@grangeinsurance.com







DISCLAIMER:
The information contained in this message may be privileged or confidential and 
is protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the
sender by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.
Thank you. Aetna   

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA-TPX and SMF question

2010-11-03 Thread Scott Barry
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 10/28/2010
05:23:16 PM:

 From: Pommier, Rex R. rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com

 Hi list,

 I can't find the answer in the CA documentation (or on Google) so I
 thought I'd come here.  In the TPX SMF records -specifically the
 interval and shutdown records - there is a section that has SACB
 statistics.  It has 2 fields in it, current SACBs in use and the
 SACB high water mark.  Can somebody tell me just what the SACB is?

 What I'm actually looking for is something that tells me the maximum
 number of concurrent users of one of the applications I have defined
 to TPX.  If I can't get that, the max number of terminal sessions
 signed onto TPX concurrently.  I'm hoping the SACB field is the
 latter of these.

 TIA.

 Rex



With SAS (or WPS) and MXG, I expect that you can derive this metric from the
Application LOGON/LOGOFF (or alternatively Terminal SIGNON/SIGNOFF) TPX SMF
record type/subtype combinations, using the MXG-unique VMXGCNCR macro
facility.  Otherwise with the TPX data-source record types, you may be able
to use some other data analysis tool to generate the desired information.


Scott Barry
SBBWorks, Inc.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: How long for SMF to switch

2010-11-03 Thread Kelman, Tom
That's true, but you'll dump less often.

Tom Kelman
Capacity Planning
Commerce Bank, Kansas City

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: How long for SMF to switch

If you are running a large CICS shop, and you have CICS TS v3 or
higher, make sure you have compression of the SMF 110 records turned on.
That will greatly reduce the amount of data put to the MAN files.  

Yes, but once the dataset is full it will still take as long to dump.
2G is still 2G, or whatever size your MAN's are.

-
I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation!
Kimota!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


*
If you wish to communicate securely with Commerce Bank and its
affiliates, you must log into your account under Online Services at 
http://www.commercebank.com or use the Commerce Bank Secure
Email Message Center at https://securemail.commercebank.com

NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files are
confidential. The information is exclusively for the use of the
individual or entity intended as the recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, any use, copying, printing, reviewing,
retention, disclosure, distribution or forwarding of the message
or any attached file is not authorized and is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please
advise the sender by reply electronic mail immediately and
permanently delete the original transmission, any attachments
and any copies of this message from your computer system.
*

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA-TPX and SMF question

2010-11-03 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Scott,

If I needed to be exact, and wanted to parse through every logon/logoff to keep 
count of how many are logged on at a particular moment in time, I could do 
that.  However, I don't need to be that exact, counts every 15 minutes work 
just fine for my need.  The problem wasn't gaining access to SAS/MXG, it was a 
problem of finding the correct variable in the correct MXG dataset to give me 
the info I need.  I found it in the TPXSESSN dataset, in the TPXCCNT variable.  
As I mentioned in a later post, I found which SMF record/variable was needed 
with some timely help from a CA developer.  From there, getting to the correct 
MXG dataset/variable was a trivial task.

Thanks.

Rex

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Scott Barry
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA-TPX and SMF question

IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 10/28/2010
05:23:16 PM:

 From: Pommier, Rex R. rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com

 Hi list,

 I can't find the answer in the CA documentation (or on Google) so I
 thought I'd come here.  In the TPX SMF records -specifically the
 interval and shutdown records - there is a section that has SACB
 statistics.  It has 2 fields in it, current SACBs in use and the
 SACB high water mark.  Can somebody tell me just what the SACB is?

 What I'm actually looking for is something that tells me the maximum
 number of concurrent users of one of the applications I have defined
 to TPX.  If I can't get that, the max number of terminal sessions
 signed onto TPX concurrently.  I'm hoping the SACB field is the
 latter of these.

 TIA.

 Rex



With SAS (or WPS) and MXG, I expect that you can derive this metric from the
Application LOGON/LOGOFF (or alternatively Terminal SIGNON/SIGNOFF) TPX SMF
record type/subtype combinations, using the MXG-unique VMXGCNCR macro
facility.  Otherwise with the TPX data-source record types, you may be able
to use some other data analysis tool to generate the desired information.


Scott Barry
SBBWorks, Inc.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

The information contained in this e-mail may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information and is intended for the sole use of the intended 
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please reply to 
sender and destroy or delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CPU capping is not working for one Lpar only on CEC?

2010-11-03 Thread Kelman, Tom
Cobe,

You do have me a little confused when you talk about capping at 24 MSUs
and setting the WEIGHT (which I assume is the LPAR weighting factor) to
160.  These are different.  Also, the LPAR weighting factor is just a
relative number.  It does not relate to MIPS.

As far as the LPAR going over the cap in any given interval, that can
occur as long as the MSU four hour rolling average (4HRA) remains below
the cap.  It is when the 4HRA hits the cap that you'll see the peaks
chopped off.  Once the 4HRA falls below the cap the system can once
again spike up above that.  If you have a cap set, and you are on
sub-capacity pricing, IBM's software charges for the sub-capacity priced
software will be based on the highest 4HRA for the month, but will never
exceed the cap.  Actually, if you are not using sub-capacity pricing for
your software, I can't think of any reason to set a cap. 

Tom Kelman
Capacity Planning
Commerce Bank, Kansas City


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Cobe Xu
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 5:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CPU capping is not working for one Lpar only on CEC?

Hi list,
We aim to cap the only active LPAR on the CEC(26 MSU) to 24 MSU.
But, I'm a bit confuse when I checked the RMF CPU Activity report as
below,
which shows that with the interval, SYS2 was able to use up to 25 MSU.
(Highlighted)
So my questions are:
1. Is this because CPU capping is not working for only one active LPAR
on
the CEC? If it's the case, any reference?
2. Or, this is related to the WEIGHT value we used to CAP? in our case,
we
reference our CEC capacity is 26 MSU (about 171 MIPS), target to CAP 24
MSU
(160 MIPS).
. But, for client's sake, we use MIPS value as the WEIGHT,i.e 160. (as
highlighted in the report). And, this mislead the Lpar scheduler that it
is
over 100% of the CEC. Thus,
  SYS2 can use as much as it needs.
3. Or any other posibility?
Pls shed some light, thanks a lot!



PAGE2
z/OS V1R8SYSTEM ID SYS2 START
08/17/2010-03.00.00  INTERVAL 000.59.59
 RPT VERSION V1R8 RMF   END
08/17/2010-04.00.00  CYCLE 0.100 SECONDS


MVS PARTITION NAMESYS2NUMBER OF PHYSICAL
PROCESSORS   4 GROUP NAME   N/A
IMAGE CAPACITY  24
CP2 LIMITN/A
NUMBER OF CONFIGURED PARTITIONS  5
ICF   2
WAIT COMPLETION
NO

DISPATCH INTERVAL
DYNAMIC

- PARTITION DATA -  -- LOGICAL PARTITION
PROCESSOR
DATA --   -- AVERAGE PROCESSOR UTILIZATION PERCENTAGES --
   MSU  -CAPPING--  PROCESSOR-  DISPATCH
TIME
DATA   LOGICAL PROCESSORS  --- PHYSICAL PROCESSORS ---
NAME   S   WGT  DEFACT  DEF   WLM%  NUM   TYPE   EFFECTIVE
TOTAL   EFFECTIVETOTAL  LPAR MGMT  EFFECTIVE  TOTAL
SYS2   A   1600 25  YES0.02   CP01.55.49.238
01.55.53.278   96.5296.57  0.06  96.52  96.57
SYS6   A100  0  YES0.02   CP00.00.00.000
00.00.00.0000.00 0.00  0.00   0.00   0.00
*PHYSICAL*
00.00.01.367   0.02  0.02

 -- -- --
  TOTAL 01.55.49.238
01.55.54.645   0.08  96.52  96.59


CFP01AH2   A   DED1   ICF   00.59.59.655
00.59.59.725   99.9999.99  0.00  50.00  50.00
CFP02AH2   A   DED1   ICF   00.59.59.666
00.59.59.708   99.9999.99  0.00  50.00  50.00
*PHYSICAL*
00.00.00.422   0.01  0.01

 -- -- --
  TOTAL 01.59.59.321
01.59.59.855   0.01  99.99  100.0


SYS8
-- 
Cobe Xu

Best Regards
---
zOS Performance  Capacity Analyst
E2E Performance Analyst
Email: cob...@gmail.com
---

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


*
If you wish to communicate securely with Commerce Bank and its
affiliates, you must log into your account under Online Services at 
http://www.commercebank.com or use the Commerce Bank Secure
Email Message Center at 

Re: How long for SMF to switch

2010-11-03 Thread Ted MacNEIL
That's true, but you'll dump less often.

My point was to address the issue of how long it takes to dump, which was the 
issue.

The consensus seems to be 1.5 minutes is too long.
I don't believe that is an issue; others do.


-
I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation!
Kimota!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: How long for SMF to switch

2010-11-03 Thread Gibney, Dave
OP was concerned about the time from I SMF to the actual switch. Which I
think was well explained by the type 19 discussion.

I'd rather a dump completed quickly, but 1.5 minutes wouldn't worry me.
SMF filling so fast that 1.5 minutes was to long would really worry me.
:)

Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
 Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
 Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:54 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Subject: Re: How long for SMF to switch
 
 That's true, but you'll dump less often.
 
 My point was to address the issue of how long it takes to dump, which
 was the issue.
 
 The consensus seems to be 1.5 minutes is too long.
 I don't believe that is an issue; others do.
 
 
 -
 I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation!
 Kimota!
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ATTACH

2010-11-03 Thread Rick Fochtman

-snip
You can get in trouble even if you know those nuances, because an idiom 
has semantics based on factors beyond vocabulary. Understanding the 
individual words perfectly doesn't help.

-unsnip-
I remember from college of a translator program that covered multiple 
languages. The phrase Out of sight, out of mind was fed in, in 
English. After translation to a number of other languages and finally 
back to English, it came back Invisible, insane.


My point: idioms and other common phrases can often be the hardest to 
translate to another language, even if you think you know all the 
possible constructs. Simply translating words isn't enough!


Rick

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: How long for SMF to switch

2010-11-03 Thread Rick Fochtman

---snip--


Rick,

Not the case.  I did a I SMF on a sandbox that had absolutely nothing running 
on it and the switch took 3 seconds.

Rex
 


--unsnip---
I stand corrected. Thank you.

Rick

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


ABCs of z/OS System Programming Volume 4

2010-11-03 Thread John Laubenheimer
I just noticed that a draft of the long missing ABCs of z/OS System
Programming Volume 4 is now available on the redbooks web site.  The final
version should be available by the end of the year.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ATTACH

2010-11-03 Thread Tony Harminc
On 3 November 2010 17:27, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:

 I remember from college of a translator program that covered multiple
 languages. The phrase Out of sight, out of mind was fed in, in English.
 After translation to a number of other languages and finally back to
 English, it came back Invisible, insane.

I think the Blind Idiot version hits the spot better.

Tony H.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ABCs of z/OS System Programming Volume 4

2010-11-03 Thread Matthew Stitt
I don't have volume 12 either.  Have I missed that?

On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:48:11 -0500, John Laubenheimer
jlaubenhei...@doitt.nyc.gov wrote:

I just noticed that a draft of the long missing ABCs of z/OS System
Programming Volume 4 is now available on the redbooks web site.  The final
version should be available by the end of the year.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ABCs of z/OS System Programming Volume 4

2010-11-03 Thread John P. Baker
Yes, you have.  It was published in January, 2010.

John P. Baker
Chief Software Architect
HFD Technologies

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Matthew Stitt
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 6:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ABCs of z/OS System Programming Volume 4

I don't have volume 12 either.  Have I missed that? 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CPU capping is not working for one Lpar only on CEC?

2010-11-03 Thread Peter Bishop
Also see the PR/SM Planning Guide which has a good discussion called
Capping in a single logical partition.

---start quote
In order to use capping for an LP on a CPC where there is a need for only
one active LP using shared CPs, you must define and activate a second
“dummy” LP. The dummy LP must also be defined as using shared CPs. The
weights of the two LPs can be adjusted to attain the desired cap for the one
LP that will actually be used.
---end quote

thanks
Peter


On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:59:39 +0800, Cobe Xu cob...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi list,
We aim to cap the only active LPAR on the CEC(26 MSU) to 24 MSU.
But, I'm a bit confuse when I checked the RMF CPU Activity report as below,
which shows that with the interval, SYS2 was able to use up to 25 MSU.
(Highlighted)
So my questions are:
1. Is this because CPU capping is not working for only one active LPAR on
the CEC? If it's the case, any reference?
2. Or, this is related to the WEIGHT value we used to CAP? in our case, we
reference our CEC capacity is 26 MSU (about 171 MIPS), target to CAP 24 MSU
(160 MIPS).
. But, for client's sake, we use MIPS value as the WEIGHT,i.e 160. (as
highlighted in the report). And, this mislead the Lpar scheduler that it is
over 100% of the CEC. Thus,
  SYS2 can use as much as it needs.
3. Or any other posibility?
Pls shed some light, thanks a lot!



PAGE2
z/OS V1R8SYSTEM ID SYS2 START
08/17/2010-03.00.00  INTERVAL 000.59.59
 RPT VERSION V1R8 RMF   END
08/17/2010-04.00.00  CYCLE 0.100 SECONDS


MVS PARTITION NAMESYS2NUMBER OF PHYSICAL
PROCESSORS   4 GROUP NAME   N/A
IMAGE CAPACITY  24
CP2 LIMITN/A
NUMBER OF CONFIGURED PARTITIONS  5
ICF   2
WAIT COMPLETION
NO

DISPATCH INTERVAL
DYNAMIC

- PARTITION DATA -  -- LOGICAL PARTITION PROCESSOR
DATA --   -- AVERAGE PROCESSOR UTILIZATION PERCENTAGES --
   MSU  -CAPPING--  PROCESSOR-  DISPATCH TIME
DATA   LOGICAL PROCESSORS  --- PHYSICAL PROCESSORS ---
NAME   S   WGT  DEFACT  DEF   WLM%  NUM   TYPE   EFFECTIVE
TOTAL   EFFECTIVETOTAL  LPAR MGMT  EFFECTIVE  TOTAL
SYS2   A   1600 25  YES0.02   CP01.55.49.238
01.55.53.278   96.5296.57  0.06  96.52  96.57
SYS6   A100  0  YES0.02   CP00.00.00.000
00.00.00.0000.00 0.00  0.00   0.00   0.00
*PHYSICAL*
00.00.01.367   0.02  0.02

 -- -- --
  TOTAL 01.55.49.238
01.55.54.645   0.08  96.52  96.59


CFP01AH2   A   DED1   ICF   00.59.59.655
00.59.59.725   99.9999.99  0.00  50.00  50.00
CFP02AH2   A   DED1   ICF   00.59.59.666
00.59.59.708   99.9999.99  0.00  50.00  50.00
*PHYSICAL*
00.00.00.422   0.01  0.01

 -- -- --
  TOTAL 01.59.59.321
01.59.59.855   0.01  99.99  100.0


SYS8
--
Cobe Xu

Best Regards
---
zOS Performance  Capacity Analyst
E2E Performance Analyst
Email: cob...@gmail.com
---

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CPU capping is not working for one Lpar only on CEC?

2010-11-03 Thread Al Sherkow
It is possible for the 4HRA of an LPAR to go above the defined capacity limit. 
This 
is because the limit goes on typically after four hours of your workload 
getting 
bigger and bigger. Eventually the 4HRA exceeds the defined capacity and the cap 
goes on. As the four hour rolling average goes forward, the values from 4 hours 
ago, then 3h45m ago, then 3h30m ago are removed from the calculation of that 
average, and values at the capping level are going into the calculation, so the 
4HRA may keep rising for a few intervals. It may even stabilize above the set 
defined capacity. Back in 2004 I coined the term bonus MSUs for these MSUs 
that are above the defined capacity value. When SCRT processes your SMF data, 
if the 4HRA in the data is above the defined capacity value SCRT ignores those 
bonus MSUs. The TsCs of sub-capacity WLC indicate you will not be charged 
for more MSUs than the Defined Capacity Value. 

Al Sherkow, I/S Management Strategies, Ltd.
Consulting Expertise on Capacity Planning, Performance Tuning,
WLC, LPARs, IRD and LCS Software
Seminars on IBM SW Pricing, LPARs, and IRD
Voice: +1 414 332-3062 
Web: www.sherkow.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OMEGAMON Manuals and 410 z196 Support

2010-11-03 Thread Timothy Sipples
George Henke asks:
Also OMEGAMON 420 has z196 support, but how about OMEGAMON
410?

No problem. Just stop by the IBM Software Support Lifecycle Web site.
Here's the link to the Ts (for Tivoli):

http://www.ibm.com/software/support/lifecycle/index_t.html

All the 4.1.x releases are still supported, and there is no end of support
date announced for them. That means all those OMEGAMONs are at least
compatible with new hardware introduced during their lifecycle.

*Exploitation* is another matter (if relevant). But compatibility -- what
IBM calls toleration -- is no problem.

- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Resident Enterprise Architect
STG Value Creation  Complex Deals Team
IBM Growth Markets (Based in Singapore)
E-Mail: timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Changing Data Class attributes

2010-11-03 Thread Don Williams
To me the following is a no brainer: If there are going to be attributes
contained in the data class structure in the SCDS which can be dynamically
queried after the initial allocation of a data set, then there should be
some means:
1. to alter a data set's data class name such as: 
   ALTER datasetname DATACLAS(newdataclass). 
2. for utilities such as dss, they should be able to re-drive the DC ACS
routine when restoring(or recalling) data sets such as:
   COPY ... NULLDATACLAS | DATACLAS(dataclassname)

 -Original Message-
 
 Don,
 
 Yes I discovered this too and it is partially true: you cannot change
 the dataclass of a dataset, but some attributes of the dataclass will
 be
 used at open-time, so changing these attributes will be noted on
 subsequent opens of datasets with that dataclass.
 
 We ran into problems with DB2 and received the following error:
 IGD104I DB2TA.DSNDBC.DRCA02.XSGMNT2.J0001.A001   RETAINED,
 DDNAME=A002289C
 IKJ56231I DATA SET DB2TA.DSNDBC.DRCA02.XSGMNT2.J0001.A001 NOT
 ALLOCATED,
 SYSTEM  OR INSTALLATION ERROR+
 IKJ56231I DYNAMIC ALLOCATION REASON CODE IS X'04FC'
 
 IEF020I DB2TDBM1 DB2TDBM1 TCT I/O TABLE SIZE EXCEEDS THE 16MB MAXIMUM.
 
 
 04FC  (1276)  Meaning: The request being processed would cause the
 TCT
 I/O table to exceed the maximum allowable size.
 Application Programmer Action: If the job that received the message has
 JCL DD statements that specify a high volume count, or the job that
 received the message uses dynamic allocation to allocate data sets and
 specifies a high volume count, reduce the volume count and rerun the
 job. If the volume count is derived from the data class, use a data
 class which has a lower volume count or contact the Storage
 Administrator.
 Storage Administrator Action: Reduce the volume count or dynamic volume
 count specified in the DATACLAS.
 
 Each time at open of a dataset the dynamic volume count value of the
 dataset's dataclass is used to create controlblocks to be able to
 extend
 the dataset. Chaning the dataclass's attributes will change the
 controlblocks on subsequent opens of the datasets.
 
 Here it is explained:
 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg3T165
 
 It is not so much undocumented, as well as rather hidden in docs partly
 related to SMS.
 
 This is why I would like to be able to change the dataclass value of a
 dataset. If a large group of datasets have a specific dataclass and you
 want to change some dynamic attributes of the dataclass and it appear
 that they are unfit for some datasets, changing these dataset's
 dataclass to a more suitable class can solve problems.
 
 Kees.
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
 confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only.
 If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-
 mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and
 that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly
 prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by
 error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and
 delete this message.
 
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or
 its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete
 transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any
 delay in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
 Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered
 number 33014286
 
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html