XRC Flashcopy
We are trying to flash from secondary to tertiary storage and receive the following error. From what I can see it looks like (reas=82) Wait limit expired for startup of the indicated partner ANTUXFQE instance. The timeout was about 30 seconds after the FC started. 18:01:39 | 'XRC='EDCPMSTR FC0SUSPEND SECONDARY COORD WFEP,Z=99' STARTED 18:01:39 M VPCTRACE XRC='EDCPMSTR FC0SUSPEND SECONDARY COORD WFEP,Z=99' STARTE 18:01:39 C VPCEXTAL: NVDP1 SDMs EDCP01,EDCP02,EDCP04 18:01:39 | AOFRUPDT: KTLP FLIP GEOTRACE ,STATUS=GEOTRACE 18:01:39 | 'INITIATE COORDINATED FC FOR SDMS RUNNING ON NVDP1 18:01:39 M VPCTRACE INITIATE COORDINATED FC FOR SDMS RUNNING ON NVDP1 18:02:10 C VPCEXTAL: ANTUXFQE Message: ANTU2201E, DI 18:02:15 | AOFRUPDT: KTLP FLIP GEOTRACE ,STATUS= FQE ERROR. RC=2C, REAS=82GEOTRACE 18:02:15 | 'FC0SUSPEND FAILED ON SDM SYSTEM NVDP1 RC= 98 18:02:15 M VPCTRACE FC0SUSPEND FAILED ON SDM SYSTEM NVDP1 RC= 98 18:02:15 C VPCETAKE: Returncode from VPCEXTAL is 98 18:02:15 - DSI205I 000 TIMER ELEMENTS PURGED OP = 'AUTGEO2' 18:02:15 | AOFRUPDT: KTLP FLIP GEOTRACE ,STATUS=GEOPRIM We have a ticket opened with IBM; but I wanted to know from the list if anyone else has experienced this? We've used this script several times in the past and everything has worked fine. We are under a time crunch because we are preparing for a disaster recovery test. Thanks. Sharon Lopez z/OS Systems Programmer State of North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services 919-754-6432 (Work) 919-398-8638 (Cell) sharon.lo...@nc.gov http://www.its.state.nc.ushttp://www.its.state.nc.us/ E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Engine increase on the 2097
We are turning on 1 engine this weekend to one of our processors; we are going from a 2097-604 to a 2097-605. Our IBM CE says that it will not need a Power-on-Reset (POR). We are not changing the weights for the lpars within the HMC; we are leaving them as is. How can we verify that the actual physical engine has been turned on? Is there a MVS display that will show this or somewhere within the HMC? Thanks. Sharon Lopez z/OS Systems Programmer State of North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services 919-754-6432 (Work) 919-398-8638 (Cell) sharon.lo...@nc.gov http://www.its.state.nc.ushttp://www.its.state.nc.us/ E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Acceptable paging
Can someone please help me determine what the 'acceptable paging' should be on a system? We are having issues with MQ and broker. Thanks. Sharon Lopez z/OS Systems Programmer State of North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services 919-754-6432 (Work) 919-398-8638 (Cell) sharon.lo...@nc.gov http://www.its.state.nc.ushttp://www.its.state.nc.us/ E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Acceptable paging
We have a z/10 and this test lpar had 11G of real memory. IBM is loaning us 16G of real memory so now we have 27G of real memory. We had 3 mod-9 page datasets and after message broker started we had to add 4 additional mod-9 page datasets. We do have IMS, CICS, and DB2 running on this system. Our tuning guy retired last year and none of us left understand how this is supposed to work. Thanks. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 9:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Acceptable paging Can someone please help me determine what the 'acceptable paging' should be on a system? We are having issues with MQ and broker. Thanks. Could you describe your environment a little? CPU(s) (z10, z9 , etc) Amount of dasd space allocated to Page Datasets? Number of Page Datasets Real Memory available Number of MQ and Brokers? Connection types (IMS, CICS, Distributed systems) Many elements can play into tuning a system. This will help in answering the question. Now, when you ask about acceptable paging in relationship to MQ, is anything else in play? CICS, IMS, DB2, heavy batch, etc. or is MQ the only thing running on that system? Or perhaps I misunderstood your acceptable paging in relationship to MQ. Thanks Lizette -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
z/OS 1.12 coexistence ptfs
We are running z/OS 1.10 and will be migrating to 1.12 next year. I'm in the process of trying to apply the coexistence ptfs and I'm continually getting PTFS that are in error and the fixes are still open. Is everyone else experiencing this also? I've been doing this for a lot of years and normally the coexistence ptfs go on without any problems. Sharon Lopez z/OS Systems Programmer State of North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services 919-754-6432 (Work) 919-398-8638 (Cell) sharon.lo...@nc.gov http://www.its.state.nc.ushttp://www.its.state.nc.us/ E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
z/OS 1.12 coexistence ptfs
We are running z/OS 1.10 and will be migrating to 1.12 next year. I'm in the process of trying to apply the coexistence ptfs and I'm continually getting PTFS that are in error and the fixes are still open. Is everyone else experiencing this also? I've been doing this for a lot of years and normally the coexistence ptfs go on without any problems. Sharon Lopez z/OS Systems Programmer State of North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services 919-754-6432 (Work) 919-398-8638 (Cell) sharon.lo...@nc.gov http://www.its.state.nc.ushttp://www.its.state.nc.us/ E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
ANTX8117I
Please someone help usWe started getting this message this week on our data mover lpar: ANTX8117I XRC SESSION(EDCP02) DELAY DETECTED AT MASTER(EDCPMSTR:EDCP04); SESSION CONSISTENCY DELAY(00:05:32.74) We have been doing XRC now for about 9 months and this is the first time this has occurred. We just went from a z9 to a z10 at our primary site (not sure this is related) but we need to figure why this is occurring. Can someone please help? I have a ticket opened with IBM and they have a dump but I just wanted to see if anyone else has experienced this error before. Thanks. E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ANTX8117I
I read the error message already...thank you...but we are in a vulnerable situation now. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B. Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 9:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: ANTX8117I In addition to Hal's reply: From QuickRef and the manual: This message can indicate a temporary peak in application activity on the primary storage control, possibly as a result of volume synchronization or resynchronization activity on that storage control. This message can be repeated periodically until the condition is relieved, as indicated by the ANTX8118I message. System Programmer Response: This message reports a condition, but does not indicate an error. If the delay condition continues for a long period of time, the application can be impacted if primary storage control cache capability is exceeded. When this message states that the primary rate exceeds the specified function, ensure that the DASD fast write option is on for the volumes associated with the function. If volume synchronization or resynchronization activity is present on any primary storage control, you can want to issue an XSUSPEND command to suspend the volume pairs that are being added until the application update rate on the primary storage controls has returned to normal. Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lopez, Sharon Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 8:43 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: ANTX8117I Please someone help usWe started getting this message this week on our data mover lpar: ANTX8117I XRC SESSION(EDCP02) DELAY DETECTED AT MASTER(EDCPMSTR:EDCP04); SESSION CONSISTENCY DELAY(00:05:32.74) We have been doing XRC now for about 9 months and this is the first time this has occurred. We just went from a z9 to a z10 at our primary site (not sure this is related) but we need to figure why this is occurring. Can someone please help? I have a ticket opened with IBM and they have a dump but I just wanted to see if anyone else has experienced this error before. Thanks. E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
XRC
We are getting cache spikes (100%) while doing a flashcopy from secondary to tertiary dasd (in the same frame) in our XRC environment. The spikes cause a suspension of the mirror. Hitachi says they don't see anything unusual, IBM says the backup is on the secondary controllers and the copy task runs twice as long on the Hitach (USP-V) as they would expect. Does anyone have any experience with XRC on Hitachi that might benefit us? Our primary is a USP-1100 and the secondary/tertiary is USP-V. Sharon Lopez z/OS Systems Programmer State of North Carolina Office of Information Technology 919-754-6432 (Office) 919-398-8638 (Cell) 919-754-6000 (ITS Service Desk) sharon.lo...@its.nc.govmailto:sharon.lo...@its.nc.gov http://www.its.state.nc.us Our new communication hub is now available. Click 'here'http://sccw.its.state.nc.us/ITSHUB/communication.pdf for more. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Program MCNVTCAT
Is MCNVTCAT available with the server/pak orders? If not, what is everyone using to define new entries into a new master catalog? Thanks. Sharon Lopez Enterprise z/OS Systems Programmer State of North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services 919-754-6432 Office 919-398-8638 Cell 919-850-2854 Fax 919-754-6000 ITS Service Desk mailto:z...@its.nc.gov sharon.lo...@its.nc.govmailto:sharon.lo...@its.nc.gov http://www.its.state.nc.ushttp://www.its.state.nc.us E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by authorized state officials - -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Insert tapes in a TS3500 without a barcode
We are trying to insert a server/pak tape 3592 into our TS3500 library, and the accessor is picking it up without a barcode. We followed the manual (redbook), and the accessor should not pick it up. Do we need to set something in the box? Thank you. Inserting cartridges without a barcode label You might receive cartridges from a software vendor, another company, or even from IBM that have standard label (SL) formats but no barcode labels. This special situation needs a particular procedure. The following example describes the insertion of a cartridge with an SL of YX0100: 1. First, you must verify that this VOLSER is not defined within a VOLSER range in the TS3500. 2. Insert the cartridge in the entry station. The accessor will not pick the cartridge because of the missing barcode. 3. Use your Web specialist function to select Manage Cartridges → I/O Station. You will see only one cartridge with unknown status. 4. Select the cartridge and select Fix Unknown Volume Serial. 5. Enter VOLSER=YX0100 and the type (JA, JJ, and so forth). Sharon Lopez Enterprise z/OS Systems Programmer State of North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services 919-754-6432 Office 919-398-8638 Cell 919-850-2854 Fax 919-754-6000 ITS Service Desk mailto:z...@its.nc.gov sharon.lo...@its.nc.govmailto:sharon.lo...@its.nc.gov http://www.its.state.nc.ushttp://www.its.state.nc.us E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by authorized state officials -
JES2 Dynamic Exit ptfs
I realized that I have to apply the JES2 Dynamic Exit ptfs to my z/OS 1.9 system as toleration ptfs for z/OS 1.10. Does anyone know of any vendor related software that was impacted by these ptfs? I guess I'm a little worried about applying these ptfscan anyone please share with me if you ran into any issues? Thanks. Sharon Lopez Enterprise Systems Programmer 919-754-6432 sharon.lo...@its.nc.govmailto:sharon.lo...@its.nc.gov -- E-Mail correspondence to and from this sender may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law, and may be disclosed to third parties. -- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue
Mystery solvedour problem was BMC Batch Optimizer...it was running on one test lpar but not the other, so our results were different. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Barry Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 8:41 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue See how much region was used by looking at the IEF374I message VIRT and EXT numbers for when it works and when it fails. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lopez, Sharon Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:46 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue We have 1.9 on one of our test systems. This is a system that was build in Jan. 2008. We also have another test 1.9 system, which I just applied all hipers and RSUs through 0806 and now I cannot get PL/I 3.7 to compile. Both systems have the same storage amount. Has anyone seen anything like this? I have a ticket opened with PL/I support and now I just opened up one with virtual storage manager. We are due to go production on Sept. 28, and I cannot go forward with this. Thanks. Sharon Lopez Enterprise Systems Programmer 919-754-6432 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- E-Mail correspondence to and from this sender may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law, and may be disclosed to third parties. -- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue
Yes, that's the only error message. I can get it to work with 0m and 60m. IBM PL/I level 2 is telling me that the new compiler needs about 100m to run. It will run with 6m on my 1.9 base system that was generated in Jan. 08. It doesn't run with 6m after I applied 700+ ptfs to my 1.9 system. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imbriale, Donald Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 2:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue Sharon, What error messages are you getting? Is it just the IBM1521I message? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lopez, Sharon Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:46 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue We have 1.9 on one of our test systems. This is a system that was build in Jan. 2008. We also have another test 1.9 system, which I just applied all hipers and RSUs through 0806 and now I cannot get PL/I 3.7 to compile. Both systems have the same storage amount. Has anyone seen anything like this? I have a ticket opened with PL/I support and now I just opened up one with virtual storage manager. We are due to go production on Sept. 28, and I cannot go forward with this. Thanks. Sharon Lopez Enterprise Systems Programmer 919-754-6432 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This communication is from JPMorgan. Generally, this communication is for informational purposes only and it is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. In the event you are receiving the offering materials attached below related to your interest in hedge funds or private equity, this communication may be intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of such fund(s). All market prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. Please refer to http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for disclosures relating to UK legal entities. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue
We have 1.9 on one of our test systems. This is a system that was build in Jan. 2008. We also have another test 1.9 system, which I just applied all hipers and RSUs through 0806 and now I cannot get PL/I 3.7 to compile. Both systems have the same storage amount. Has anyone seen anything like this? I have a ticket opened with PL/I support and now I just opened up one with virtual storage manager. We are due to go production on Sept. 28, and I cannot go forward with this. Thanks. Sharon Lopez Enterprise Systems Programmer 919-754-6432 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- E-Mail correspondence to and from this sender may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law, and may be disclosed to third parties. -- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue
Region = 6m...works on the 1.8 system. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Shannon Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 3:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS 1.9 and IBM1521I S 4.0 Not enough virtual memory is available to continue What is your region size? Bob Shannon Rocket Software -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
S0C4 in TSO/PIE and z/OS 1.9
Has anyone experience any problems with product TSO/PIE and z/OS 1.9? We are getting 0C4s in module MSPF after applying all hipers, and RSUs through 0806. Sharon Lopez Enterprise Systems Programmer 919-754-6432 [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- E-Mail correspondence to and from this sender may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law, and may be disclosed to third parties. -- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Platinum and z/OS V1.9
Check in the z/OS 1.9 migration guide under DFSMS migration actions. There is a section in there that talks about defining linear data sets with CISIZE greater than 4096. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 4:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Platinum and z/OS V1.9 It should but the file must be SMS managed. From: Lizette Koehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 8/25/2008 4:24 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Platinum and z/OS V1.9 Would that force Platinum to use more '*'? Currently the dataclas for this data is (NULL). Lizette Lizette, You might consider using a Data class that has the following attributes: Space Constraint Relief . . . : YES Reduce Space Up To (%) . . : 30 Dynamic Volume Count . . . : 9 Regards, Dave O'Brien From: Lizette Koehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 8/25/2008 4:11 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Platinum and z/OS V1.9 Cross posting to IBMMAIN and DB2 Newsgroups Are there any issues with DB2 V8, Platinum and z/OS V1.9? Our DBA group is indicating that since the z/OS V1.9 operating system went in, the Platinum loads have failed on space issues. What they are seeing are: IGD17226I THERE IS AN INSUFFICIENT NUMBER OF VOLUMES IN THE ELIGIBLE STORAGE GROUP(S) TO SATISFY THIS REQUEST FOR DATA SET TSTDSN1.DSNDBC.DSN1005.DSN1XXOE.I0001.A001 IGD17290I THERE WERE 1 CANDIDATE STORAGE GROUPS OF WHICH THE FIRST 1 WERE ELIGIBLE FOR VOLUME SELECTION. THE CANDIDATE STORAGE GROUPS WERE:TST1 IGD17279I 88 VOLUMES WERE REJECTED BECAUSE THE SMS VOLUME STATUS WAS DISABLED IGD17279I 133 VOLUMES WERE REJECTED BECAUSE OF INSUFF TOTAL SPACE IGD17219I UNABLE TO CONTINUE DEFINE OF DATA SET TSTDSN1.DSNDBC.DSN1005.DSN1XXOE.I0001.A001 IDC3003I FUNCTION TERMINATED. CONDITION CODE IS 12 IDC0002I IDCAMS PROCESSING COMPLETE. MAXIMUM CONDITION CODE WAS 12 DEFINE CLUSTER (NAME(TSTDSN1.DSNDBC.DSN1005.DSN1XXOE.I0001.A001 ) - LINEAR REUSE SPEED SHAREOPTIONS(3 3) ) - DATA (NAME(TSTDSN1.DSNDBD.DSN1005.DSN1XXOE.I0001.A001 ) - RECORDS( 000297000,9) - CONTROLINTERVALSIZE(32768) - VOLUMES(* )) My recommendation is to add more asterisks to the VOLUME statement. We have at least 6 volumes that can handle the primary allocation. And if I calculated it correctly it is 1650 Cylinders Primary and 500 cylinders secondary. What I believe to be happening is that due to the one asterisk is causing the failure and if it had more it might make it. My questions: 1) Can you alter the define in Platinum to use more asterisks? 2) Is there a change in z/OS V1.9 that makes storage allocation more difficult with DFSMS? Any ACS or other changes needed to alter the behavior? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
VTS tapes at DR
We are mirroring our IBM VTS at our disaster recovery site. What do most people use in order to make the volumes private during a disaster recovery test? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Stand-alone
We are at our new datacenter and we are trying to perform stand-alone ICKDSF, and DFDSS from an IBM Tape Library. We do not have any consoles yet and we are trying to do this from the HMC. ICKDSF is the first file and it works finethe second file is DFDSS and it will load successfully but we are not able to get a console...we get MESSAGE INTERFACE UNAVAILABLE. We were able to do this process at our original datacenter, but we had a console. Has anyone encountered this same situation using HMC? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
