Re: IPL with future date

2006-09-21 Thread Brown, James Alan
Just speaking form my Y2K testing experience You are inviting
problems with future dates on current systems.  We had to do a complete
reinstall of SAS because we did what you describe on a real system (not
an emulator). 


Alan Brown
(706) 462-2249



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 7:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IPL with future date

We have a FLEX-ES box with a number of instances (sort of like lpars)
and I would like to ipl one of the instances with a date some time in
the future to do some testing.  However, that instance would touch
catalogs from our production instance which would be running with the
current date.  Is this a recipe for disaster or will I get away with it.

Jim McAlpine

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search
the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IPL with future date

2006-09-21 Thread Lizette Koehler
What kind of testing are you trying to do?  There are date simulator
products like HOURGLASS or I think Compuware has one.  With these products
your applications can pick a date and time to run in and not affect the rest
of the environment.

Lizette


-- Snip ---
We have a FLEX-ES box with a number of instances (sort of like lpars) and I
would like to ipl one of the instances with a date some time in the future
to do some testing.  However, that instance would touch catalogs from our
production instance which would be running with the current date.  Is this
a recipe for disaster or will I get away with it.
-- UnSnip ---

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IPL with future date

2006-09-21 Thread Rob Scott
Jim

Don't do it - a recipe for disaster and you will get lots of You did
WHAT? from vendors if anything breaks.

Dump/Copy the stuff you want from the live system and then isolate
your timewarp system from everything else.  


Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: 21 September 2006 07:58
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IPL with future date

We have a FLEX-ES box with a number of instances (sort of like lpars)
and I would like to ipl one of the instances with a date some time in
the future to do some testing.  However, that instance would touch
catalogs from our production instance which would be running with the
current date.  Is this a recipe for disaster or will I get away with it.

Jim McAlpine

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IPL with future date

2006-09-21 Thread Shane
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 12:58 +0100, Jim McAlpine wrote:
 Is this recipe for disaster or will I get away with it.

Yes.
No.

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IPL with future date

2006-09-21 Thread Daniel A. McLaughlin
  We did an extensive date progression test for Y2K. We went to the DR 
site, rented extra time, and played with it for a week. 

I'm fairly certain we got extended keys from our vendors to avoid that 
problem. Once we started moving forward, though, we never fell back.

Beware the SIBW!!!




Daniel McLaughlin
ZOS Systems Programmer
Crawford  Company
PH: 770 621 3256
[EMAIL PROTECTED]









--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IPL with future date

2006-09-21 Thread Zohar, Meir
Shane 

Just some bad experiences from Y2K. 

You're looking for trouble with any backup/restore mechanism that is
date sensitive .

You're also looking at software licensing that may selectively go crazy
(if it's using an anti-tampering algorithm). 

The only way to do this is to completely isolate the system or use
software designed for time warping (and there should some around left
from the last millennium ...) 

Meir Zohar 



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shane
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IPL with future date

On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 12:58 +0100, Jim McAlpine wrote:
 Is this recipe for disaster or will I get away with it.

Yes.
No.

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IPL with future date

2006-09-21 Thread Walt Farrell

On 9/21/2006 7:58 AM, Jim McAlpine wrote:

We have a FLEX-ES box with a number of instances (sort of like lpars) and I
would like to ipl one of the instances with a date some time in the future
to do some testing.  However, that instance would touch catalogs from our
production instance which would be running with the current date.  Is 
this a recipe for disaster or will I get away with it.


Don't forget that if your date is far enough into the future, and you're 
using RACF, you'll end up getting users revoked for inactivity.  That 
will not affect PROTECTED users, nor SPECIAL users, nor (to some effect) 
STC user IDs, but it will affect everyone else.


Walt Farrell, CISSP
z/OS Security Design, IBM

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html