Re: z10BC Memory Upgrade All-But Impossible

2012-11-11 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2012-11-11 00:45, Edward Jaffe pisze:

On 11/10/2012 2:25 PM, John Gilmore wrote:

It is possible, even usual in many shops, to continue to use machines
well after they have been withdrawn from marketing.

The inability to obtain more storage or to activate a spare, already
acquired CP is another, much more serious matter.  That sort of thing
apparently came later.  How much later?


Hardware memory upgrade MES for z10BC was discontinued after June
2012--coincident with marketing withdrawal. If you have pre-planned
memory installed but not activated, you can still get the microcode
memory activation MES until June 2013. But, the price has been jacked up
so high ($8K/GB) that it might as well not be available at all!



Well, $8k/GB is special price for you, which includes all possible 
discounts. I mean in Poland.
And I'm not talking about discontinued machines - hat was the prices 
when z9 or z10 was the newest machine.



--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego adresata. Odbiorc moe by jedynie 
jej adresat z wyczeniem dostpu osób trzecich. Jeeli nie jeste adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomoci lub pracownikiem upowanionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, e jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne dziaanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i moe by 
karalne. Jeeli otrzymae t wiadomo omykowo, prosimy niezwocznie 
zawiadomi nadawc wysyajc odpowied oraz trwale usun t wiadomo 
wczajc w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorised to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to hard drive. 


BRE Bank SA, 00-950 Warszawa, ul. Senatorska 18, tel. +48 (22) 829 00 00, fax 
+48 (22) 829 00 33, www.brebank.pl, e-mail: i...@brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. 
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2012 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci wpacony) wynosi 168.410.984 zotych.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z10BC Memory Upgrade All-But Impossible

2012-11-11 Thread John Gilmore
Edward Jaffe wrote:

begin extract
Understand, this is not the price for the memory. This is just the
price to _enable_ the memory.
end extract

It is indeed the price of some  trivial, off-the-shelf µcode changes;
and these changes are not very size-sensitive.  A [small] flat charge
would have been more appropriate.

I said here on another occasion that some microprocessor assembly
languages had clearly been designed to discourage their use; but here
we have something subtler: this scheme will produce some high-margin
revenue too.

John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


FICON card and apc connector

2012-11-11 Thread R.S.

All FICON singlemode cables I have seen are pc (physical contact).
Q: is apc connector supported?

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może być jedynie 
jej adresat z wyłączeniem dostępu osób trzecich. Jeżeli nie jesteś adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomości lub pracownikiem upoważnionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i może być 
karalne. Jeżeli otrzymałeś tę wiadomość omyłkowo, prosimy niezwłocznie 
zawiadomić nadawcę wysyłając odpowiedź oraz trwale usunąć tę wiadomość 
włączając w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorised to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to hard drive. 


BRE Bank SA, 00-950 Warszawa, ul. Senatorska 18, tel. +48 (22) 829 00 00, fax 
+48 (22) 829 00 33, www.brebank.pl, e-mail: i...@brebank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. 
Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2012 r. kapitał zakładowy BRE Banku SA (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.410.984 złotych.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z10BC Memory Upgrade All-But Impossible

2012-11-11 Thread Leslie Turriff
On Friday 09 November 2012 19:59:33 Edward Jaffe wrote:
 Those of you with z10BC machines waiting for the z12BC to come out had
 better learn to make do with what you have.

 Keep in mind that z10BC is just _one_ generation removed from the current
 z114 business class machine. Nevertheless, hardware MES were withdrawn
 earlier this year and microcode MES are announced withdrawn as of June
 2013.

 A memory upgrade is both hardware (the physical DIMMs) and microcode
 (enabling the memory). The only way to get additional memory for a z10
 these days is to buy it on the used market. And, IBM is charging a premium
 price for the magic screwdriver to enable this memory: $8K/GB! Thus, a
 16GB memory upgrade would cost $128K in services PLUS the cost of the
 memory itself! (FYI. You can buy a brand new z114 machine for that...)

This reminds me of the System/3 that I worked on in my college days; 
the 
school purchased an upgrade to larger DASD (for I don't know how much), and 
the field engineer's implementation was to open the DASD drawer and clip off 
the wire loop that prevented the access arm from extending all the way into 
the drive's inner tracks...

Leslie

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


PPT NOPASS setting

2012-11-11 Thread Anthony Fletcher
Does anyone remember whether there was once a reason to set NOPASS against 
programs GIMSMP (or HMASMP before that) or the dump services module IEAVTDSV?

We have them set in PROGA0 and some auditors want to know why since thet is 
apparently not the default. If it was the default for those programs once, then 
perhaps the whole original entry was copied to make sime other update.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: PPT NOPASS setting

2012-11-11 Thread Anthony Thompson
IEAVTDSV is set to NOPASS is the IBM-supplied PPT, there shouldn't be any need 
to specify it in your SCHED member. 

GIMSMP sounds dodgy to me... maybe it was once set to be allowed to access it's 
DDDEF datasets to save cycles (?), but then anyone could compose a DDDEF / 
Usermod to update just about anything, assuming the GIMSMP program itself isn't 
program-protected or in a secure library.

Ant.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Anthony Fletcher
Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 11:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: PPT NOPASS setting

Does anyone remember whether there was once a reason to set NOPASS against 
programs GIMSMP (or HMASMP before that) or the dump services module IEAVTDSV?

We have them set in PROGA0 and some auditors want to know why since thet is 
apparently not the default. If it was the default for those programs once, then 
perhaps the whole original entry was copied to make sime other update.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z10BC Memory Upgrade All-But Impossible

2012-11-11 Thread ibmmain
 And if you listen to Martin, everyone out there on zSeries (of any sort) is 
 apparently wallowing in memory anyway.
They are. The memory just isn't for z/OS, it is for zLinux. After all, 
everybody knows that z/OS makes do without adequate resources, when Linux 
applications fail. 

You wouldn't believe the fight I went through to get our z/OS lpars enough real 
to get paging below the 25% threshold when we migrated from 1.10 to 1.12. Not 
to mention to stop the RSM abends we experienced that IBM was unable to debug 
and that were most probably due to not enough real and a serialization problem 
somewhere. That was about 30GB of real for 10 lpars. 30GB were thrown easily at 
one Linux runnig under VM, on the other hand.

 Customers rebelled against the constant need to update the OS we've had to 
 dance to over the last few years, and IBM changed its tune.
As someone else said, I don't think customers rebelled. I think that IBMs own 
resources are spread so thin that the previous cycle couldn't be maintained 
anymore. Did you notice lately that BCP questions are answered from China on 
this forum? It looks to me like some of the development labs went there.

While I can appreciate that IBM is innovating the platform, economics like 
this is really putting the squeeze on many IBM customers.  This is a very 
disturbing trend in zSystem economics, which IBM should reverse but likely 
won't.

If you're not one of the big customers, you have lost. In a few years there 
will be 50 large mainframe installations around the world and all small ones 
will have been absorbed into those 50. Recent development in z/OS only helps 
large customers who can afford 'large' hardware.

Also, I attended Bob Rogers' 'crystal ball' session at the last zConference in 
Berlin in May. I think he was talking about the architecture of what is now 
called z12EC. What I got out of that is that the instruction set for z/OS (our 
zArchitecture) is basically tacked on to a completely different type (forgot 
which). And given how much z/OS is made to look and feel like what the clickers 
are used to (which is the only area IBM spends development dollars on), I 
firmly believe that z/OS is doomed.

I just hope that I'll be able to work on z/OS until I retire. Which is entirely 
too far into the future.
How's that for gloom on a Monday morning?

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SRB

2012-11-11 Thread Edward Jaffe

On 11/9/2012 4:30 AM, Peter Relson wrote:

The Space Token (STOKEN) for an address space is in ASSBSTKN.

It used to be that this was not considered a programming interface and
that you were expected to use ALESERV EXTRACTH to obtain it. We decided
that was relatively ridiculous since internal usage of ASSBSTKN was
pervasive, so you now may reference this field.


Glad to hear it. I'm pretty sure 'external' references to this field are also 
pervasive. ;)


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: PPT NOPASS setting

2012-11-11 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Anthony Fletcher wrote:

Does anyone remember whether there was once a reason to set NOPASS against 
programs GIMSMP (or HMASMP before that) or the dump services module IEAVTDSV?

GIMSMP - (Living in SYS1.MIGLIB) - No need to be there. AFAIK, it is not needed 
to be in SCHEDxx. 
The same applies for IEAVTDSV too, but I don't see any documentation for it 
(perhaps I missed it), but I know that due to nature of Dump Service, it needs 
to be APF and RACF accesses to produce dumps datasets.

We have them set in PROGA0 and some auditors want to know why since thet is 
apparently not the default. If it was the default for those programs once, 
then perhaps the whole original entry was copied to make sime other update.

Drop them. The statements, not the auditors! ;-)

For once, the auditors are asking the right questions here.

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN