Re: z/OS 2.1 DVD Collection - Software Products

2013-12-17 Thread Shane Ginnane
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 08:35:26 -0600, Kevin Minerley wrote:

Until KC is fully in place, we will try to provide quarterly updates of the 
elements and features
xks shelves when they change and we do try to ensure the are ALS indexed so 
that the
search is nearly that of a BOO (it uses a BKI under the covers against the 
PDFs).

This includes task shelves such as messages and codes.  We have made all 
shelves downloadable from
the external IBM Publications Center.   Softcopy Librarian still works with 
them.

I took the opportunity to have a longer look at the z/OS KC today.
Allowing for the fact it is a (early) beta, I found the personal collection and 
incessant re-downloading of manuals I revisited less than intuitive (it's 
likely I happened upon a poor candidate manual or two - happens). The search is 
useless at present, but I'm prepared to accept that is a time/resourcing 
limitation issue.
Certainly has prospects - hopefully the Christmas/New year period will be quiet 
enough for me to spend some more time becoming acquainted.

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Geek Is Now A Praiseword, Not An Insult Apparently - Forbes

2013-12-17 Thread Mark Regan
My personal definition of legacy is any new code or system that finally goes 
into production. By way of using the word bequeathed, if would be something 
from the build team, bequeathed to the run team to operate and now maintain.


 
Thanks,

Mark Regan




 From: Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:54 AM
Subject: Re: Geek Is Now A Praiseword, Not An Insult Apparently - Forbes
 

Roger W. Suhr wrote:

Definitions of 'legacy' [leg-uh-see]  

(noun)
1. anything bequeathed

Interesting definition. Thanks.

But according to non z/Os geeks 'legacy' is: obsolete, outdated, antique, etc. 
or something like that ...

That legacy green screen thing must be replaced by our ultramodern, ultrafast, 
userfriendly, errorfree GUI gizmo. Try it for 30 days free and you can convert 
all your data instantly to our gizmo for free.

;-D   8-D   ;-D  8-D

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Geek Is Now A Praiseword, Not An Insult Apparently - Forbes

2013-12-17 Thread John McKown
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Mark Regan netsfw-ibmm...@yahoo.comwrote:

 My personal definition of legacy is any new code or system that finally
 goes into production. By way of using the word bequeathed, if would be
 something from the build team, bequeathed to the run team to operate and
 now maintain.


At bit OT, but I liked a saying I saw on Slashdot: The code is not
debugged until the last user has died.



 Thanks,

 Mark Regan
 




-- 
This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough
hunchbacks.

Maranatha! 
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS 2.1 DVD Collection - Software Products

2013-12-17 Thread Staller, Allan
More improvements that don't improve...

The new tools are neither as fast, reliable, or available as their 
predecessors!

Are you listening IBM?

snip
I took the opportunity to have a longer look at the z/OS KC today.
Allowing for the fact it is a (early) beta, I found the personal collection and 
incessant re-downloading of manuals I revisited less than intuitive (it's 
likely I happened upon a poor candidate manual or two - happens). The search is 
useless at present, but I'm prepared to accept that is a time/resourcing 
limitation issue.
Certainly has prospects - hopefully the Christmas/New year period will be quiet 
enough for me to spend some more time becoming acquainted.
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Geek Is Now A Praiseword, Not An Insult Apparently - Forbes

2013-12-17 Thread Scott Ford
Is that like production testing, if it works it's production if if fails it's a 
test

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD

'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


 On Dec 17, 2013, at 7:49 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Mark Regan netsfw-ibmm...@yahoo.comwrote:
 
 My personal definition of legacy is any new code or system that finally
 goes into production. By way of using the word bequeathed, if would be
 something from the build team, bequeathed to the run team to operate and
 now maintain.
 
 At bit OT, but I liked a saying I saw on Slashdot: The code is not
 debugged until the last user has died.
 
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Mark Regan
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough
 hunchbacks.
 
 Maranatha! 
 John McKown
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread Miklos Szigetvari

Hi

How would you deinstall (if it is the proper expression) software, for 
example

BDT (Bulk Data Transfer) ?

--
Kind regards, / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Miklos Szigetvari

Research  Development
ISIS Papyrus Europe AG
Alter Wienerweg 12, A-2344 Maria Enzersdorf, Austria
T: +43(2236) 27551 333, F: +43(2236)21081
E-mail: miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com
Info: i...@isis-papyrus.com Hotline: +43-2236-27551-111
Visit our brand new extended Website at www.isis-papyrus.com
---
This e-mail is only intended for the recipient and not legally
binding. Unauthorised use, publication, reproduction or
disclosure of the content of this e-mail is not permitted.
This email has been checked for known viruses, but ISIS Papyrus accepts
no responsibility for malicious or inappropriate content.
---

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Geek Is Now A Praiseword, Not An Insult Apparently - Forbes

2013-12-17 Thread Ed Gould


At bit OT, but I liked a saying I saw on Slashdot: The code is not
debugged until the last user has died.



John:

Well that half true.
Maybe a better way of saying it is to say when all users have died  
the code is fully debugged.


d

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread Rob Scott
To remove the SMP/E elements :
 
(o) Compose a dummy FMID that has a DELETE statement for the FMID(s) of the 
products that you wish to remove - for example :

++FUNCTION(DELDUM1) .  
++VER(Z038) DELETE(fmid) .  

(o) APPLY and ACCEPT the dummy FMID 

Obviously remember to use CHECK for APPLY and ACCEPT first

Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: 17 December 2013 14:30
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Deinstall software, for example BDT

 Hi

How would you deinstall (if it is the proper expression) software, for 
example BDT (Bulk Data Transfer) ?

--
Kind regards, / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Miklos Szigetvari

Research  Development
ISIS Papyrus Europe AG
Alter Wienerweg 12, A-2344 Maria Enzersdorf, Austria
T: +43(2236) 27551 333, F: +43(2236)21081
E-mail: miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com
Info: i...@isis-papyrus.com Hotline: +43-2236-27551-111 Visit our brand new 
extended Website at www.isis-papyrus.com
---
This e-mail is only intended for the recipient and not legally binding. 
Unauthorised use, publication, reproduction or disclosure of the content of 
this e-mail is not permitted.
This email has been checked for known viruses, but ISIS Papyrus accepts no 
responsibility for malicious or inappropriate content.
---

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread Skeldum, William
In the past I've written a function sysmod that deletes the FMID(s) I want to 
delete (DELETE operand on ++VER).  I have not had to do this for a long, so 
there may be a newer/better way.

Bill Skeldum
Systems Programmer
303-231-2561

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 7:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Deinstall software, for example BDT

 Hi

How would you deinstall (if it is the proper expression) software, for 
example BDT (Bulk Data Transfer) ?

--
Kind regards, / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Miklos Szigetvari

Research  Development
ISIS Papyrus Europe AG
Alter Wienerweg 12, A-2344 Maria Enzersdorf, Austria
T: +43(2236) 27551 333, F: +43(2236)21081
E-mail: miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com
Info: i...@isis-papyrus.com Hotline: +43-2236-27551-111 Visit our brand new 
extended Website at www.isis-papyrus.com
---
This e-mail is only intended for the recipient and not legally binding. 
Unauthorised use, publication, reproduction or disclosure of the content of 
this e-mail is not permitted.
This email has been checked for known viruses, but ISIS Papyrus accepts no 
responsibility for malicious or inappropriate content.
---

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

The information contained in this electronic communication and any document 
attached hereto or transmitted herewith is confidential and intended for the 
exclusive use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this 
message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
examination, use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
or any part thereof is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail 
and destroy this communication. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread Jousma, David
If you want to completely remove all traces, then use this.  change yourfmid 
to the FMID(s) you want to remove:

//SMPPTFIN DD   * 
++ FUNCTION(DELFUNC) REWORK(2013150). 
++ VER(Z038) DELETE(YOURFMID) .   
/*
//SMPCNTL  DD   * 
  SET BDY(GLOBAL).
   RECEIVE  S(DELFUNC).   
  SET BDY(MVSTZN).
APPLY REDO CHECK  S(DELFUNC). 
APPLY REDO   S(DELFUNC).  
  SET BDY(MVSDZN).
ACCEPT CHECK S(DELFUNC).  
ACCEPT S(DELFUNC).
  SET BDY(MVSTZN).
   UCLIN. 
DEL  SYSMOD(DELFUNC). 
DEL  SYSMOD(YOURFMID).
   ENDUCL.
  SET BDY(MVSDZN).
   UCLIN. 
DEL  SYSMOD(DELFUNC). 
DEL  SYSMOD(YOURFMID).
   ENDUCL.
  SET BDY(GLOBAL) .  
   REJECT HOLDDATA NOFMID
   PRODUCT DELETEFMID (DELFUNC YOURFMID) .   
/*   
//   

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Skeldum, William
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

In the past I've written a function sysmod that deletes the FMID(s) I want to 
delete (DELETE operand on ++VER).  I have not had to do this for a long, so 
there may be a newer/better way.

Bill Skeldum
Systems Programmer
303-231-2561

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 7:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Deinstall software, for example BDT

 Hi

How would you deinstall (if it is the proper expression) software, for 
example BDT (Bulk Data Transfer) ?

--
Kind regards, / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Miklos Szigetvari

Research  Development
ISIS Papyrus Europe AG
Alter Wienerweg 12, A-2344 Maria Enzersdorf, Austria
T: +43(2236) 27551 333, F: +43(2236)21081
E-mail: miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com
Info: i...@isis-papyrus.com Hotline: +43-2236-27551-111 Visit our brand new 
extended Website at www.isis-papyrus.com
---
This e-mail is only intended for the recipient and not legally binding. 
Unauthorised use, publication, reproduction or disclosure of the content of 
this e-mail is not permitted.
This email has been checked for known viruses, but ISIS Papyrus accepts no 
responsibility for malicious or inappropriate content.
---

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

The information contained in this electronic communication and any document 
attached hereto or transmitted herewith is confidential and intended for the 
exclusive use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this 
message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
examination, use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
or any part thereof is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail 
and destroy this communication. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS 2.1 DVD Collection - Software Products

2013-12-17 Thread Dana Mitchell
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:13:12 +, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com 
wrote:

Are you listening IBM?

Unless someone can make a compelling business case that IBM improving the 
documentation will increase IBM's revenue (EPS) in some major way, then it's 
going to continue to get it's funding cut as it has in the past.

Dana

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Space Switch Entry Tables in different Job Step

2013-12-17 Thread esst...@juno.com
Rob,Jim

Thank You for your responses.
I agree with both of You.

I wrestling with the statement in Extended Addressability.
It specifically identifies entry tables PCss *AND* not PCcp.

I interpret that as entry tables describing PCcp routines are allowed in a 
seperate step.

Sorry for being so dense, but thats how I intrepret it.
Yes LX are destroted at Task Termination. And the Extended Addressability 
specifically states PCss, thats what is odd.
It does not say All Entry Tables...
   

Paul D'Angelo

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Space Switch Entry Tables in different Job Step

2013-12-17 Thread Rob Scott
The LXRES and ETCRE services build control blocks in the PCAUTH private area.

All of the definitions you specify in your ETDEF statements get translated into 
ETE control blocks inside PCAUTH LSQA .

The LXAT is the table of linkage index allocations (see Data Areas manual) and 
is in PCAUTH private (sp229). 

Without the LX there is no way for the ETEs to be accessed to build the PC 
routine invocation for client callers as the first stage lookup in the LXAT 
will fail. 

This applies for both PC-cp and PC-ss.

It is also worth remembering that the only difference between a PC-cp and PC-ss 
in the ETE is the SSWITCH=YES/NO option on ETDEF - (obviously the coding 
techniques for the actual PC routine will most likely be different to cater for 
the entry environment).   

I imagine that there is a RESMGR routine that is established for the calling 
task/ASID when LXRES is invoked so that LXAT cleanup actions can be performed 
when the LXRES-issuing TCB terminates and has not cleaned up properly using 
LXFRE etc.  

Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of esst...@juno.com
Sent: 17 December 2013 15:09
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Space Switch Entry Tables in different Job Step

Rob,Jim

Thank You for your responses.
I agree with both of You.

I wrestling with the statement in Extended Addressability.
It specifically identifies entry tables PCss *AND* not PCcp.

I interpret that as entry tables describing PCcp routines are allowed in a 
seperate step.

Sorry for being so dense, but thats how I intrepret it.
Yes LX are destroted at Task Termination. And the Extended Addressability 
specifically states PCss, thats what is odd.
It does not say All Entry Tables...
   

Paul D'Angelo

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread John Eells
USE CAUTION when uninstalling software with dummy function deletes. 
Make certain that there are no intersections that would cause problems 
after the product or products are removed.  For example, if a product's 
MCS includes one or more VERSION statements, it can replace some 
(potentially all) of the parts of another product during installation. 
Deleting such a product will remove those parts, and can leave stuff 
behind that no longer works.


(Sorry, I have no idea whether BDT has any VERSION statements.)

--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2013-12-17 16:46, John Eells pisze:
USE CAUTION when uninstalling software with dummy function deletes. 
Make certain that there are no intersections that would cause problems 
after the product or products are removed.  For example, if a 
product's MCS includes one or more VERSION statements, it can replace 
some (potentially all) of the parts of another product during 
installation. Deleting such a product will remove those parts, and can 
leave stuff behind that no longer works.


(Sorry, I have no idea whether BDT has any VERSION statements.)

Some time ago I asked IBM (and this group also AFAIR) how to deinstall 
given software product. Requirements are quite simple and obvious:
1. System is still usable, SMP/E database is not corrupted or crippled 
in any way.

2. IBM audit is happy the product is no longer available on the system.

What's funny - nobody provided clear  reasonable method. IMHO dummy 
function is a trick, not official procedure. Similar trick could be to 
just delete product libraries or remove APF them from AAPF list (for 
thse product which require APF).

So, what is IBM-approved method to delete the product?

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






---
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego adresata. Odbiorc moe by jedynie 
jej adresat z wyczeniem dostpu osób trzecich. Jeeli nie jeste adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomoci lub pracownikiem upowanionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, e jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne dziaanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i moe by 
karalne. Jeeli otrzymae t wiadomo omykowo, prosimy niezwocznie 
zawiadomi nadawc wysyajc odpowied oraz trwale usun t wiadomo 
wczajc w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzib w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl 
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2013 r. kapita zakadowy mBanku S.A. (w caoci wpacony) wynosi 168.555.904 zote.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS 2.1 DVD Collection - Software Products

2013-12-17 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2013-12-17, at 07:13, Staller, Allan wrote:
 
 Are you listening IBM?
  
Sure they are:

The corporate direction to Information Centers and, soon,
Knowledge Centers (KC) -- especially the latter -- is supposed
to help re-federate information.

Is re-federate a word?

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Geek Is Now A Praiseword, Not An Insult Apparently - Forbes

2013-12-17 Thread Gord Tomlin

On 2013-12-17 00:54, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:

But according to non z/Os geeks 'legacy' is: obsolete, outdated, antique, etc. 
or something like that ...


In Toronto, when IBM disposed of their country club, the housing 
development that replaced it was called Legacy.


--

Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread Ed Jaffe

On 12/17/2013 6:30 AM, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
How would you deinstall (if it is the proper expression) software, 
for example

BDT (Bulk Data Transfer) ?


Like all optional, priced-features of z/OS, BDT never needs to be 
uninstalled. It should simply be disabled through IFAPRDxx. For 
example, change:


PRODUCT OWNER('IBM CORP')
NAME(Z/OS)
ID(5694-A01)
FEATURENAME(BDTFTF)
VERSION(*) RELEASE(*) MOD(*)
STATE(ENABLED)   == THIS!!

PRODUCT OWNER('IBM CORP')
NAME(Z/OS)
ID(5694-A01)
FEATURENAME(BDTFTF)
VERSION(*) RELEASE(*) MOD(*)
STATE(DISABLED)   == TO THIS!!

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS 2.1 DVD Collection - Software Products

2013-12-17 Thread John Gilmore
're-federate' with the hyphen is a a very dubious word; without the
hyphen and interpreteted as a verb it presumably means to reconstitute
a quondam federation that is/was in dissolution.

In an IBM SCD it is a feel-good noise word that does not denote
anything specific and makes no specific commitments.   Its use at all
does suggest that the existence of a problem is being acknowledged.

John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread John Eells

Ed Jaffe wrote:

On 12/17/2013 6:30 AM, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:

How would you deinstall (if it is the proper expression) software,
for example
BDT (Bulk Data Transfer) ?


Like all optional, priced-features of z/OS, BDT never needs to be
uninstalled. It should simply be disabled through IFAPRDxx. For
example, change:

PRODUCT OWNER('IBM CORP')
 NAME(Z/OS)
 ID(5694-A01)
 FEATURENAME(BDTFTF)
 VERSION(*) RELEASE(*) MOD(*)
 STATE(ENABLED)   == THIS!!

PRODUCT OWNER('IBM CORP')
 NAME(Z/OS)
 ID(5694-A01)
 FEATURENAME(BDTFTF)
 VERSION(*) RELEASE(*) MOD(*)
 STATE(DISABLED)   == TO THIS!!



Good catch, Ed.  I'd forgotten BDT was part of z/OS (blush).

--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread Mike Schwab
Not IBM approved, but method we did.
1. Notify users.
2. RACF datasets so no access, read by backup group.
3. Rename datasets (add .OLD).
4. Delete datasets and source of software.

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:58 AM, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
 W dniu 2013-12-17 16:46, John Eells pisze:

 USE CAUTION when uninstalling software with dummy function deletes. Make
 certain that there are no intersections that would cause problems after the
 product or products are removed.  For example, if a product's MCS includes
 one or more VERSION statements, it can replace some (potentially all) of the
 parts of another product during installation. Deleting such a product will
 remove those parts, and can leave stuff behind that no longer works.

 (Sorry, I have no idea whether BDT has any VERSION statements.)

 Some time ago I asked IBM (and this group also AFAIR) how to deinstall given
 software product. Requirements are quite simple and obvious:
 1. System is still usable, SMP/E database is not corrupted or crippled in
 any way.
 2. IBM audit is happy the product is no longer available on the system.

 What's funny - nobody provided clear  reasonable method. IMHO dummy
 function is a trick, not official procedure. Similar trick could be to just
 delete product libraries or remove APF them from AAPF list (for thse product
 which require APF).
 So, what is IBM-approved method to delete the product?

 --
 Radoslaw Skorupka
 Lodz, Poland






 ---
 Tre   tej wiadomo ci mo e zawiera  informacje prawnie chronione Banku
 przeznaczone wy  cznie do u ytku s u bowego adresata. Odbiorc  mo e by
 jedynie jej adresat z wy  czeniem dost pu osób trzecich. Je eli nie jeste
 adresatem niniejszej wiadomo ci lub pracownikiem upowa nionym do jej
 przekazania adresatowi, informujemy,  e jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie,
 rozprowadzanie lub inne dzia anie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie
 zabronione i mo e by  karalne. Je eli otrzyma e  t  wiadomo   omy kowo,
 prosimy niezw ocznie zawiadomi  nadawc  wysy aj c odpowied  oraz trwale usun
 t  wiadomo   w  czaj c w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na
 dysku.

 This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is
 intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be
 received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If
 you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized
 to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying,
 distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be
 punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender
 immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete
 permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved
 to hard drive.

 mBank S.A. z siedzib  w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa,
 www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl S d Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII
 Wydzia  Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru S dowego, nr rejestru przedsi biorców
 KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Wed ug stanu na dzie  01.01.2013 r.
 kapita  zak adowy mBanku S.A. (w ca o ci wp acony) wynosi 168.555.904 z ote.



 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS 2.1 DVD Collection - Software Products

2013-12-17 Thread Doug Fuerst

Just gimme the book. PDF please.

Doug



-- Original Message --
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 12/17/2013 11:04:46 AM
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.1 DVD Collection - Software Products

The corporate direction to Information Centers and, soon,
Knowledge Centers (KC) -- especially the latter -- is supposed
to help re-federate information.

Is re-federate a word?

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Space Switch Entry Tables in different Job Step

2013-12-17 Thread Jim Mulder
 I imagine that there is a RESMGR routine that is established for the
 calling task/ASID when LXRES is invoked so that LXAT cleanup actions
 can be performed when the LXRES-issuing TCB terminates and has not 
 cleaned up properly using LXFRE etc. 

 LXRES dates back to MVS/370 SP1.2.  RESMGR did not exist until
MVS/ESA SP3.1.0.  LX and Entry Table  cleanup is done by a static task
termination resource manager which is called only when the terminating
TCB is a Cross Memory Resource Owning Task (i.e., the TCB address
matches the contents of ASCBXTCB). 

 To quote myself, 

 The CMROT (whose address is in ASCBXTCB) is always the
jobstep task of the started task or job, regardless of which
task actually does the LXRES and ETCON. 

Jim Mulder   z/OS System Test   IBM Corp.  Poughkeepsie,  NY

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS 2.1 DVD Collection - Software Products

2013-12-17 Thread Ed Gould

Dana:

Not sure I agree with you 100 percent.
I think that a long time ago that IBM sat up and listened at SHARE  
was just around the time of OCO.
IBM sent a strong contingent to SHARE about documentation and they  
seemed to listen! For a while documentation got a lot better (except  
for OE stuff which has never been adequate).


Ed

On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:01 AM, Dana Mitchell wrote:

On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:13:12 +, Staller, Allan  
allan.stal...@kbmg.com wrote:



Are you listening IBM?


Unless someone can make a compelling business case that IBM  
improving the documentation will increase IBM's revenue (EPS) in  
some major way, then it's going to continue to get it's funding cut  
as it has in the past.


Dana

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Geek Is Now A Praiseword, Not An Insult Apparently - Forbes

2013-12-17 Thread Tony Harminc
On 17 December 2013 00:54, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
 But according to non z/Os geeks 'legacy' is: obsolete, outdated, antique, 
 etc. or something like that ...

 That legacy green screen thing must be replaced by our ultramodern, 
 ultrafast, userfriendly, errorfree GUI gizmo. Try it for 30 days free and you 
 can convert all your data instantly to our gizmo for free.

Two can play at that game. I use the L word with whatever it is that
the opponent thinks is good. Well, we do have some legacy stuff
implemented in Ruby on Rails with bits of Java and Python kludged on,
but we can easily consolidate that onto a modern z/OS system and save
money.

Tony H.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Intercept USS calls

2013-12-17 Thread Don Poitras
In article 2861860432296333.wa.wernerzmindsltd@listserv.ua.edu you wrote:
 Thanks, 

 Tony, the SMF option I tried, unfortunately the records for open/close of USS 
 files are not written in all cases. 

 Don, the service stubs are loaded at USS startup and reside always at the 
 same offset like published in the document you pointed out. I.E. BPX1OPN - 
 156 Thats the way you can find it with Assembler.  But it is possible to call 
 them or even the BPX4xxx (64 bit) straight from the CSSLIB? I'm not 
 completely sure about it.   

The stubs in CSSLIB just do the same thing as one would do in assembler.
You can step through the calls with ASMIDF to verify.

-- 
Don Poitras - SAS Development  -  SAS Institute Inc. - SAS Campus Drive
sas...@sas.com   (919) 531-5637Cary, NC 27513

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Intercept USS calls

2013-12-17 Thread Werner Zieleznik
Thanks, 

Tony, the SMF option I tried, unfortunately the records for open/close of USS 
files are not written in all cases. 

Don, the service stubs are loaded at USS startup and reside always at the same 
offset like published in the document you pointed out. I.E. BPX1OPN - 156 
Thats the way you can find it with Assembler.  But it is possible to call them 
or even the BPX4xxx (64 bit) straight from the CSSLIB? I'm not completely sure 
about it.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Geek Is Now A Praiseword, Not An Insult Apparently - Forbes

2013-12-17 Thread Gibney, Dave
I've always liked The stuff that works :)

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Roger W. Suhr
 Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 4:44 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Geek Is Now A Praiseword, Not An Insult Apparently - Forbes
 
 Definitions of 'legacy' [leg-uh-see]
 
 Dictionary.com - (Showing 1 definitions)
 
 
 (noun)
 
 1. anything bequeathed
 
 Find more definitions for legacy on Dictionary.com »
 
 
 Synonyms:
 
 
 
 Bequest
 
 Birthright
 
 Devise
 
 Endowment
 
 
 Aid
 
 Alimony
 
 Allocation
 
 Allotment
 
 
 Bequeathal
 
 Bequeathment
 
 Bestowal
 
 Devisal
 
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
 Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 10:54 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Geek Is Now A Praiseword, Not An Insult Apparently - Forbes
 
 On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 08:46:43 -0800, Mark Regan wrote:
 
  http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/12/16/geek-is-now-a-prais
  eword-not-an-insult-apparently/
 
 Could Legacy be next?
 
 -- gil
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
 lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
 lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Intercept USS calls

2013-12-17 Thread Tony Harminc
On 17 December 2013 14:38, Don Poitras poit...@pobox.com wrote:
 I don't see why someone couldn't install their own table in place
 of the pointed to by the CVT. See

 http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v2r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.v2r1.bpxb100%2Fbpx2cr_Example.htm

Sure - I agree that that's not hard. But, as with SVC screening, you
have to eventually pass control on to the real routine (or conceivably
fail the call or implement a different version yourself). If all you
want to do is log the calls, well it's probably not too hard, though
you might have to be aware of the caller's environment. If you want to
do all this without introducing security or integrity exposures, you
may have to analyze each call you want to capture. It may also be the
case that some software just knows the PC numbers for certain
routines, and doesn't go through the CSR table at all. Not a good
practice, but I'd be surprised if it doesn't exist.

And who knows what recovery and repair there may be in the UNIX
kernel, or if those tables are dynamically updated as a matter of
routine.

This would be fun to experiment with on your own private LPAR or zPDT,
and I'm not saying it can't or even shouldn't be done, but is anyone
really going to install such a change into their production systems?
That's why I said it falls into the not for the faint of heart
category.

Tony H.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Intercept USS calls

2013-12-17 Thread Don Poitras
In article CAArMM9RSgenhOi792=dhsbsd1ztdfrypygoodzdoawbeu2f...@mail.gmail.com 
you wrote:
 On 17 December 2013 13:36, Werner Zieleznik wer...@zmindsltd.com wrote:
  Does somebody know how to intercept z/OS USS calls?
  I managed to intercept several SVC's for audit reasons. Now I would like to 
  to do the same for USS calls.

 The kernel calls are PCs. IBM has rejected (or required a business
 case for, which comes very close) a number of requests for something
 analogous to SVC Screening for PCs. These were generally not in a UNIX
 context, but e.g. to allow front-ending of STORAGE OBTAIN. It's
 conceivable that you could front-end the entire UNIX PC set, but this
 would fall into the not for the faint of heart category of schemes
 that come up here from time to time.

 There are a few UNIX exits that might cover some of what you want, but
 as for a general UNIX audit facility you may have to reply on SMF
 records and the like.

 Tony H.

I don't see why someone couldn't install their own table in place
of the pointed to by the CVT. See

http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v2r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.v2r1.bpxb100%2Fbpx2cr_Example.htm

-- 
Don Poitras - SAS Development  -  SAS Institute Inc. - SAS Campus Drive
sas...@sas.com   (919) 531-5637Cary, NC 27513

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Intercept USS calls

2013-12-17 Thread Kenneth Wilkerson
Modifying the CVT to perform intercepts is definitely very easy but also
extremely risky. Modifying the CVT affects the entire system. All it takes
is the mishandling of a single caller, particularly one critical to an
address space and all hell breaks loose. I tried it once. I modified the PC
number in the SVT for a key system  PC.  A simple programming error caused
system wide havoc. I'll never do anything that has global system affects
again. Any intercept must be designed to provide isolation, at least for
testing.

On the other hand, PCs are managed at the address space level by
Z/Architecture.  So provided you have the capabilities to create the
necessary PC data structures required by the hardware in real, fixed
storage, you can intercept PC calls. It takes a lot of code and definitely
not recommended for faint of heart. Once a PC intercept is created, its
simple to pass the call to the original PC routine by simply branch entering
the original code with the state set by the PC call. You already have the
stacked entry . If you require both a front and back end intercept, this can
easily be accomplished by creating bypass PC definitions that mimic the
original Pc definition. 

But from experience, unless you're willing to write and debug a lot of code,
I'd get what I need from SMF.

Kenneth

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Tony Harminc
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Intercept USS calls

On 17 December 2013 14:38, Don Poitras poit...@pobox.com wrote:
 I don't see why someone couldn't install their own table in place of 
 the pointed to by the CVT. See

 http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v2r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.
 zos.v2r1.bpxb100%2Fbpx2cr_Example.htm

Sure - I agree that that's not hard. But, as with SVC screening, you have to
eventually pass control on to the real routine (or conceivably fail the call
or implement a different version yourself). If all you want to do is log the
calls, well it's probably not too hard, though you might have to be aware of
the caller's environment. If you want to do all this without introducing
security or integrity exposures, you may have to analyze each call you want
to capture. It may also be the case that some software just knows the PC
numbers for certain routines, and doesn't go through the CSR table at all.
Not a good practice, but I'd be surprised if it doesn't exist.

And who knows what recovery and repair there may be in the UNIX kernel, or
if those tables are dynamically updated as a matter of routine.

This would be fun to experiment with on your own private LPAR or zPDT, and
I'm not saying it can't or even shouldn't be done, but is anyone really
going to install such a change into their production systems?
That's why I said it falls into the not for the faint of heart
category.

Tony H.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Geek Is Now A Praiseword, Not An Insult Apparently - Forbes

2013-12-17 Thread Scott Ford
Elardus,

Sounds like a classic sales pitch to me...

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD

'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


 On Dec 17, 2013, at 6:52 AM, Mark Regan netsfw-ibmm...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
 My personal definition of legacy is any new code or system that finally goes 
 into production. By way of using the word bequeathed, if would be something 
 from the build team, bequeathed to the run team to operate and now maintain.
 
 
  
 Thanks,
 
 Mark Regan
 
 
 
 
 From: Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
 Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:54 AM
 Subject: Re: Geek Is Now A Praiseword, Not An Insult Apparently - Forbes
 
 
 Roger W. Suhr wrote:
 
 Definitions of 'legacy' [leg-uh-see] 
 
 (noun)
 1. anything bequeathed
 
 Interesting definition. Thanks.
 
 But according to non z/Os geeks 'legacy' is: obsolete, outdated, antique, 
 etc. or something like that ...
 
 That legacy green screen thing must be replaced by our ultramodern, 
 ultrafast, userfriendly, errorfree GUI gizmo. Try it for 30 days free and you 
 can convert all your data instantly to our gizmo for free.
 
 ;-D   8-D   ;-D  8-D
 
 Groete / Greetings
 Elardus Engelbrecht
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Intercept USS calls

2013-12-17 Thread Tony Harminc
On 17 December 2013 13:36, Werner Zieleznik wer...@zmindsltd.com wrote:
 Does somebody know how to intercept z/OS USS calls?
 I managed to intercept several SVC's for audit reasons. Now I would like to 
 to do the same for USS calls.

The kernel calls are PCs. IBM has rejected (or required a business
case for, which comes very close) a number of requests for something
analogous to SVC Screening for PCs. These were generally not in a UNIX
context, but e.g. to allow front-ending of STORAGE OBTAIN. It's
conceivable that you could front-end the entire UNIX PC set, but this
would fall into the not for the faint of heart category of schemes
that come up here from time to time.

There are a few UNIX exits that might cover some of what you want, but
as for a general UNIX audit facility you may have to reply on SMF
records and the like.

Tony H.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread Jon Perryman
Never manually delete a product without going thru SMP/E. I'm not familiar with 
BDT so lets say you wanted to delete C/C++. They are dependant upon LE. The 
next time an LE PTF has a COREQ for a C/C++ PTF, you will be screwed. Using 
SMP/E function delete is the only recommended method to delete a product.  As 
someone mentioned earlier, you should check for cross product dependencies but 
if you did miss something, then you can just re-install the product.

Jon Perryman.




 From: Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com


Not IBM approved, but method we did.
1. Notify users.
2. RACF datasets so no access, read by backup group.
3. Rename datasets (add .OLD).
4. Delete datasets and source of software.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread Craig . Pace
Why would you want to delete a product that comes as part of the base; for 
example, BDT and is either ENABLE or DISABLED via IFAPRDxx?

 
 
Thanks,
 
Craig



From:   Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, 
Date:   12/17/2013 15:38
Subject:Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



Never manually delete a product without going thru SMP/E. I'm not familiar 
with BDT so lets say you wanted to delete C/C++. They are dependant upon 
LE. The next time an LE PTF has a COREQ for a C/C++ PTF, you will be 
screwed. Using SMP/E function delete is the only recommended method to 
delete a product.  As someone mentioned earlier, you should check for 
cross product dependencies but if you did miss something, then you can 
just re-install the product.

Jon Perryman.




 From: Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com


Not IBM approved, but method we did.
1. Notify users.
2. RACF datasets so no access, read by backup group.
3. Rename datasets (add .OLD).
4. Delete datasets and source of software.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


**
This communication contains information which is confidential and
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note
that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and
then destroy any copies of it.
**

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Intercept USS calls

2013-12-17 Thread Werner Zieleznik
Hi, 

Does somebody know how to intercept z/OS USS calls? 
I managed to intercept several SVC's for audit reasons. Now I would like to to 
do the same for USS calls.

Thanks

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


LOOKAT 404

2013-12-17 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On page:

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/index.html

The LOOKAT link:

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/lookat

Gives me 404 Not Found.  There happens to be a Report this problem
button on the error page.  I clicked on it.  Let's all do that.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2013-12-17 22:43, craig.p...@fotlinc.com pisze:

Why would you want to delete a product that comes as part of the base; for
example, BDT and is either ENABLE or DISABLED via IFAPRDxx?



Good point. There is working and IBM-blessed method for z/OS *FEATURES*, 
like RACF, dss, rmm, C/C++ or BDT.
Such (paid) features always come (as a code) with z/OS, but some of them 
are disabled in IFAPRD, while others are enabled.
And this is OK for IBM. Of course everyone is aware that customer may 
enable the feature without paying for that, but that's another story.


However separate *PRODUCTS* (like DB2, CICS, MQ, COBOL, OMEGAMONs, TWS, 
etc. etc.) are different issue:
- you get it only when you explicitely ordered it. Product can be 
delivered in separate package (CBPDO) or bundled with system in ServerPac
- you shouldn'tt have the code whan you didn't ordered it. The 
unanswered problem arises when you want to stop using given product.

- IFAPRD member is not relevant here.
- IBM does not use product keys, so lack of key is not a a prove you 
don't use the product.




BTW: Who's using BDT? And what is it for? I understand it (never paid 
attention, so I can be totally wrong here) as very old 
replacement/alternative to FTP.




Regards

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego adresata. Odbiorc moe by jedynie 
jej adresat z wyczeniem dostpu osób trzecich. Jeeli nie jeste adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomoci lub pracownikiem upowanionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, e jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne dziaanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i moe by 
karalne. Jeeli otrzymae t wiadomo omykowo, prosimy niezwocznie 
zawiadomi nadawc wysyajc odpowied oraz trwale usun t wiadomo 
wczajc w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorized to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive.

mBank S.A. z siedzib w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa, www.mBank.pl, e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl 
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2013 r. kapita zakadowy mBanku S.A. (w caoci wpacony) wynosi 168.555.904 zote.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS 2.1 DVD Collection - Software Products

2013-12-17 Thread Scott Ford
Ed,

Unfortunately, it's like being a large sales IBM customer and all of a sudden 
you decide to switch mainframe vendor what happens ? Money talks in my 
experience so far. It's a pity too. 

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD

'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


 On Dec 17, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net wrote:
 
 Dana:
 
 Not sure I agree with you 100 percent.
 I think that a long time ago that IBM sat up and listened at SHARE was just 
 around the time of OCO.
 IBM sent a strong contingent to SHARE about documentation and they seemed to 
 listen! For a while documentation got a lot better (except for OE stuff which 
 has never been adequate).
 
 Ed
 
 On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:01 AM, Dana Mitchell wrote:
 
 On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:13:12 +, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com 
 wrote:
 
 Are you listening IBM?
 
 Unless someone can make a compelling business case that IBM improving the 
 documentation will increase IBM's revenue (EPS) in some major way, then it's 
 going to continue to get it's funding cut as it has in the past.
 
 Dana
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Deinstall software, for example BDT

2013-12-17 Thread Ed Jaffe

On 12/17/2013 1:38 PM, Jon Perryman wrote:

Never manually delete a product without going thru SMP/E. I'm not familiar with 
BDT so lets say you wanted to delete C/C++.


To uninstall C/C++ under z/OS you would change the following in IFAPRDxx:

PRODUCT OWNER('IBM CORP')
NAME(Z/OS)
ID(5694-A01)
VERSION(*) RELEASE(*) MOD(*)
FEATURENAME('C/C++')
STATE(ENABLED) == THIS!

to:

PRODUCT OWNER('IBM CORP')
NAME(Z/OS)
ID(5694-A01)
VERSION(*) RELEASE(*) MOD(*)
FEATURENAME('C/C++')
STATE(DISABLED)== TO THIS!

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS 2.1 DVD Collection - Software Products

2013-12-17 Thread Ed Gould

Scott:
Well that is pretty major. However IBM had farmed their sales out to  
a less than good set of people. If you buy from them you are small  
meat .


They chew you out and spit through the teeth. (BTDTGTTS and its rotten)

Face it you have the problem no matter what so you use SHARE to the  
biggest advantage and call a rotten APPLE just that.


Ed

On Dec 17, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Scott Ford wrote:


Ed,

Unfortunately, it's like being a large sales IBM customer and all  
of a sudden you decide to switch mainframe vendor what happens ?  
Money talks in my experience so far. It's a pity too.


Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD

'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


On Dec 17, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net  
wrote:


Dana:

Not sure I agree with you 100 percent.
I think that a long time ago that IBM sat up and listened at SHARE  
was just around the time of OCO.
IBM sent a strong contingent to SHARE about documentation and they  
seemed to listen! For a while documentation got a lot better  
(except for OE stuff which has never been adequate).


Ed


On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:01 AM, Dana Mitchell wrote:

On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:13:12 +, Staller, Allan  
allan.stal...@kbmg.com wrote:


Are you listening IBM?


Unless someone can make a compelling business case that IBM  
improving the documentation will increase IBM's revenue (EPS) in  
some major way, then it's going to continue to get it's funding  
cut as it has in the past.


Dana

 
--

For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM- 
MAIN


- 
-

For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM- 
MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: LOOKAT 404

2013-12-17 Thread Lizette Koehler
Gil,

This link worked for me just now

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/

Lizette


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
 Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
 Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:58 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: LOOKAT 404
 
 On page:
 
 http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/index.html
 
 The LOOKAT link:
 
 http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/lookat
 
 Gives me 404 Not Found.  There happens to be a Report this problem
 button on the error page.  I clicked on it.  Let's all do that.
 
 -- gil
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: LOOKAT 404

2013-12-17 Thread Tony Harminc
On 17 December 2013 20:23, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
 This link worked for me just now

 http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/

Works for me too, but it's not the link on the main z/OS Internet
LIbrary page. IBM surely outdoes all other big companies in the dead
link department. Well, maybe HP comes a close second...

Tony H.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: LOOKAT 404

2013-12-17 Thread David Crayford

On 18/12/2013 10:33 AM, Tony Harminc wrote:

On 17 December 2013 20:23, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:

This link worked for me just now

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/

Works for me too, but it's not the link on the main z/OS Internet
LIbrary page. IBM surely outdoes all other big companies in the dead
link department. Well, maybe HP comes a close second...


dead links = poor standards. If government can get it right an IT 
behemoth shouldn't fail so miserably 
http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2012/10/11/no-link-left-behind/.



Tony H.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Intercept USS calls

2013-12-17 Thread Rob Schramm
There at least one prior thread on USS files and SMF exits.  Need
IEFU83/84/85 to make sure you have captured file close.

Unless you know of a situation for USS file close that is not covered by
the IEFu83/84/85?

Rob Schramm

p.s. and for those picking nits.. USS in this case is unix system
services... not the first one.

shields up
*groan*
May Chris Mason send us a message from the beyond to correct me.


Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Imperium Group



On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Kenneth Wilkerson redb...@austin.rr.comwrote:

 Modifying the CVT to perform intercepts is definitely very easy but also
 extremely risky. Modifying the CVT affects the entire system. All it takes
 is the mishandling of a single caller, particularly one critical to an
 address space and all hell breaks loose. I tried it once. I modified the PC
 number in the SVT for a key system  PC.  A simple programming error caused
 system wide havoc. I'll never do anything that has global system affects
 again. Any intercept must be designed to provide isolation, at least for
 testing.

 On the other hand, PCs are managed at the address space level by
 Z/Architecture.  So provided you have the capabilities to create the
 necessary PC data structures required by the hardware in real, fixed
 storage, you can intercept PC calls. It takes a lot of code and definitely
 not recommended for faint of heart. Once a PC intercept is created, its
 simple to pass the call to the original PC routine by simply branch
 entering
 the original code with the state set by the PC call. You already have the
 stacked entry . If you require both a front and back end intercept, this
 can
 easily be accomplished by creating bypass PC definitions that mimic the
 original Pc definition.

 But from experience, unless you're willing to write and debug a lot of
 code,
 I'd get what I need from SMF.

 Kenneth

 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
 Behalf Of Tony Harminc
 Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:25 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Intercept USS calls

 On 17 December 2013 14:38, Don Poitras poit...@pobox.com wrote:
  I don't see why someone couldn't install their own table in place of
  the pointed to by the CVT. See
 
  http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v2r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.
  zos.v2r1.bpxb100%2Fbpx2cr_Example.htm

 Sure - I agree that that's not hard. But, as with SVC screening, you have
 to
 eventually pass control on to the real routine (or conceivably fail the
 call
 or implement a different version yourself). If all you want to do is log
 the
 calls, well it's probably not too hard, though you might have to be aware
 of
 the caller's environment. If you want to do all this without introducing
 security or integrity exposures, you may have to analyze each call you want
 to capture. It may also be the case that some software just knows the PC
 numbers for certain routines, and doesn't go through the CSR table at all.
 Not a good practice, but I'd be surprised if it doesn't exist.

 And who knows what recovery and repair there may be in the UNIX kernel, or
 if those tables are dynamically updated as a matter of routine.

 This would be fun to experiment with on your own private LPAR or zPDT, and
 I'm not saying it can't or even shouldn't be done, but is anyone really
 going to install such a change into their production systems?
 That's why I said it falls into the not for the faint of heart
 category.

 Tony H.

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
 to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Intercept USS calls

2013-12-17 Thread Skip Robinson
It's days from Friday, but I can't resist. The NSA can intercept calls to 
US(S) or anywhere else. You don't even have to ask. 

.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com



From:   Rob Schramm rob.schr...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, 
Date:   12/17/2013 07:01 PM
Subject:Re: Intercept USS calls
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



There at least one prior thread on USS files and SMF exits.  Need
IEFU83/84/85 to make sure you have captured file close.

major snippage

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Intercept USS calls

2013-12-17 Thread Steve Comstock

On 12/17/2013 9:03 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:

It's days from Friday, but I can't resist. The NSA can intercept calls to
US(S) or anywhere else. You don't even have to ask.


OK, also off topic (and off color?): driving to an audition today
saw a bumper sticker that really overloads the USS acronymn:
Universal Semen Sales

'struth!

-Steve Comstock




.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com



From:   Rob Schramm rob.schr...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date:   12/17/2013 07:01 PM
Subject:Re: Intercept USS calls
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



There at least one prior thread on USS files and SMF exits.  Need
IEFU83/84/85 to make sure you have captured file close.

major snippage

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Intercept USS calls

2013-12-17 Thread Timothy Sipples
Would the following functionality help?

http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v2r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.v2r1.icha800%2Fomvsaud.htm


Timothy Sipples
GMU VCT Architect Executive (Based in Singapore)
E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: LOOKAT 404

2013-12-17 Thread Timothy Sipples
If you need to get to the correct page in the interim, here is the link:

http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/

Thanks, Paul.


Timothy Sipples
GMU VCT Architect Executive (Based in Singapore)
E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: LOOKAT 404

2013-12-17 Thread Avram Friedman
For years IBM has recommended that when bookmarking there sites,
Modify the HTTP string from WWW??.  to WWW.
The ?? part as in WWW-03 or WWW2 is used interally to route to various 
servers.
WWW.IBM* is an alais to the actual site that gets updated as pages move 
between servers.


The issue here is IBM did not follow its own book mark advice which is designed 
to avoid problems like this.
A failure of highly trained TECH writters and proofers.

Avram Friedman

On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:59:56 +0800, Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com wrote:

If you need to get to the correct page in the interim, here is the link:

http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/

Thanks, Paul.


Timothy Sipples
GMU VCT Architect Executive (Based in Singapore)
E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN