CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE
Dear Folks, Please leave the distribution of my articles as is. If you want to see more of them, please think responsibly and don't post them. Get them from where they are. Thanks much. Sincerely, Sam -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE
I was thinking maybe a cbtnewslettter web page where updates to technological articles are posted as .pdf then when they're updated Sam could point us to the new link as a .pdf. In a message dated 12/23/2019 7:36:23 PM Central Standard Time, wayn...@gmail.com writes: I like it where it is, it makes me go there.and learn. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE
On 23 Dec 2019 14:27:00 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:<5007816406371788.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu>) 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Paul Gilmartin) wrote: It's not obvious to me that a zipped NETDATA archive of an IEBCOPY-unloaded PDS fixed-80 member is the ideal format for a text document. But it does conform to cbttape.org conventions. It also tends to keep the management types away. What I meant when I said, "I'd be happier if things like that stayed on CBT," was that I'd be happier if they weren't easily available to those who might object to the content. The CBT tape had a history of such troubles (though admittedly few). Sam's instructions were good enough that I had no trouble downloading the correct file and finding the correct member. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE
To quote Rick Nelson. "But it's all right now, I learned my lesson well. You see, ya can't please everyone, so ya got to please yourself" It's a Tour de force. Good work Sam. I like it where it is, it makes me go there.and learn. On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 9:27 AM Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 21:41:03 +, Edward Finnell wrote: > > >Well sort of. I tried to post it as a .txt attachment and it was rejected > due to length. Maybe a happy medium is to subscribe to the CBT Newsletter. > > > Instructions? OK: http://www.cbttape.org/maillist.htm > Is there an archive? > > Yahoo has announced end-of-life of their data repository: > https://twitter.com/YahooCare/status/1204312003701092352 > Google? > > >In a message dated 12/23/2019 9:31:25 AM Central Standard Time, > bdis...@dissensoftware.com writes: > >It is not a binary choice. It can be both posted and on the CBT tape > > It's not obvious to me that a zipped NETDATA archive of an IEBCOPY-unloaded > PDS fixed-80 member is the ideal format for a text document. But it does > conform to cbttape.org conventions. > > “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, > adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines..." > > -- gil > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Wayne V. Bickerdike -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 21:41:03 +, Edward Finnell wrote: >Well sort of. I tried to post it as a .txt attachment and it was rejected due >to length. Maybe a happy medium is to subscribe to the CBT Newsletter. > Instructions? OK: http://www.cbttape.org/maillist.htm Is there an archive? Yahoo has announced end-of-life of their data repository: https://twitter.com/YahooCare/status/1204312003701092352 Google? >In a message dated 12/23/2019 9:31:25 AM Central Standard Time, >bdis...@dissensoftware.com writes: >It is not a binary choice. It can be both posted and on the CBT tape It's not obvious to me that a zipped NETDATA archive of an IEBCOPY-unloaded PDS fixed-80 member is the ideal format for a text document. But it does conform to cbttape.org conventions. “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines..." -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IP 0.0.0.0
On 12/23/19 12:53 AM, Jake Anderson wrote: Hello Hi, Cross posted Where is it cross posted from / to? (I'd like to look at the other location.) Out network vulnerability team has reported that there is a traffic between 0.0.0.0 and LPAR IP. Is there any chance that the vulnerability team is using 0.0.0.0 as a stand in for that is not a defined communications end point? As in it doesn't match known hosts, thus it matches 0.0.0.0/0? -- Grant. . . . unix || die -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE
Well sort of. I tried to post it as a .txt attachment and it was rejected due to length. Maybe a happy medium is to subscribe to the CBT Newsletter. In a message dated 12/23/2019 9:31:25 AM Central Standard Time, bdis...@dissensoftware.com writes: It is not a binary choice. It can be both posted and on the CBT tape -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors
Rex, I had a bit too much egg-nog while on the job too I guess. I saw that *right* after I pressed Send at least we all had the right link!!! _ Dave Jousma AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI 49546 616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 2:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** Dave, Somewhere in the middle? Lizette's first attempt was CISIZER, the second CFCISER, reality CFSIZER. Don't worry, Lizette, I do the same thing all the time. :-) You got it right where it counted - in the URL. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 11:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors I think you were right the first time Lizette! A bit early for the egg-nog... https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cfsizer _ Dave Jousma AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI 49546 616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 12:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** Sorry it should read CFCISER not CISIZER. Had a finger check Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of Lizette Koehler > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 10:42 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors > > Have you tried the CISIZER on https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cfsizer > > > It may have some information for you on this process. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > > Behalf Of Peter > > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 9:25 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: LOGSTREAM sizing factors > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > We are going to deploy a zOS product which writes LOGSTREAM on CF > structure. > > From the performance point of view what are all aspects i need to be > > aware for example dasd space for LOGSTREAM logs, storage sizing , CF > > memory sizing and we are expecting atleast 50 million transaction on > production. > > . > > > > Could you provide me an idea based on which i can size my LOGSTREAM > > > > Peter > > > > > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > > IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly
Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors
Dave, Somewhere in the middle? Lizette's first attempt was CISIZER, the second CFCISER, reality CFSIZER. Don't worry, Lizette, I do the same thing all the time. :-) You got it right where it counted - in the URL. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 11:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors I think you were right the first time Lizette! A bit early for the egg-nog... https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cfsizer _ Dave Jousma AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI 49546 616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 12:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** Sorry it should read CFCISER not CISIZER. Had a finger check Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of Lizette Koehler > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 10:42 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors > > Have you tried the CISIZER on https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cfsizer > > > It may have some information for you on this process. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > > Behalf Of Peter > > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 9:25 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: LOGSTREAM sizing factors > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > We are going to deploy a zOS product which writes LOGSTREAM on CF > structure. > > From the performance point of view what are all aspects i need to be > > aware for example dasd space for LOGSTREAM logs, storage sizing , CF > > memory sizing and we are expecting atleast 50 million transaction on > production. > > . > > > > Could you provide me an idea based on which i can size my LOGSTREAM > > > > Peter > > > > > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > > IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE
While I would certainly like to see the reports posted here, the cbttape.org home page has a lot more than just one link. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Keith Smith <02abf4b7a103-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 1:32 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE For me cbttape.org just had a link to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cbt-tape/ and then I requested access to the yahoo group and now I need a yahoo group ID... so I just quit trying. On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 1:27 PM Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 15:23:14 -0500, Tony Thigpen wrote: > > >Any way you could just put a copy in a post to this list? > > > Why? Is cbttape.org inaccessible to you? > > > >Sam Golob wrote on 12/22/19 2:36 PM: > >> > >> I've just completed a new article which you might find interesting > >> to read. It is on the Updates page of > >> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1wmohaG7EEd1vSnFuVh0sLW04ol8e_nfPJrDM3suaz7I2-Ns2_fJ2drTnhsWEnK7ihLgWkX4cXj1lOSaLEZBt1XsrKZbxN7PDenxlYF7sjhg8s0XIPA5pc7kZ1Xj5wY-8vVSQPKOVCEgjIl4TsWCwEEYdbZ5KxhXtYnahS-jdmZVhPScHqMpwWTezWMtmnQ4NzErEHYvPCofAqI6jTG-U6mMPm3-LTwqbxtOHhHirqwThp7JDG-VQxyXvuhDtRzBwcaSce3USnISLwcLuYZgjoBVlwdRNGra300AxbncRSk6rFfMNhPhxGWwcgVX0Wl0lZ9L_zKaas4NlzwSb3FzF5V5NIgWaa1ywUqDN7rWI3ztFd2pPQhTeLqcGviab6ng1zhNPXUwXMF3x9ebaJb0KCSJbBxDgEXtBNesB9uh8GKUhaZY1BCwVEgoB7EI88Kdx/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbttape.org > >> on File 120, as > >> member BM1912DE. > > -- gil > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Keith Smith Engineer-Enterprise Sys Sr.-IT Capacity & Performance Shaw Industries Inc. Subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway 616 E Walnut Ave Mail Drop 072-08 Dalton, GA 30721 Email: keith.sm...@shawinc.com Office: 706.532.3244 Please consider the environment before printing. -- ** Privileged and/or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or are not responsible for delivery of this message to that person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and notify the sender by reply e-mail. If you or your employer do not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind, please advise the sender. Shaw Industries does not provide or endorse any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the company or its subsidiaries. ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE
For me cbttape.org just had a link to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cbt-tape/ and then I requested access to the yahoo group and now I need a yahoo group ID... so I just quit trying. On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 1:27 PM Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 15:23:14 -0500, Tony Thigpen wrote: > > >Any way you could just put a copy in a post to this list? > > > Why? Is cbttape.org inaccessible to you? > > > >Sam Golob wrote on 12/22/19 2:36 PM: > >> > >> I've just completed a new article which you might find interesting > >> to read. It is on the Updates page of www.cbttape.org on File 120, as > >> member BM1912DE. > > -- gil > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Keith Smith Engineer-Enterprise Sys Sr.-IT Capacity & Performance Shaw Industries Inc. Subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway 616 E Walnut Ave Mail Drop 072-08 Dalton, GA 30721 Email: keith.sm...@shawinc.com Office: 706.532.3244 Please consider the environment before printing. -- ** Privileged and/or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or are not responsible for delivery of this message to that person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and notify the sender by reply e-mail. If you or your employer do not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind, please advise the sender. Shaw Industries does not provide or endorse any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the company or its subsidiaries. ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 15:23:14 -0500, Tony Thigpen wrote: >Any way you could just put a copy in a post to this list? > Why? Is cbttape.org inaccessible to you? >Sam Golob wrote on 12/22/19 2:36 PM: >> >> I've just completed a new article which you might find interesting >> to read. It is on the Updates page of www.cbttape.org on File 120, as >> member BM1912DE. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors
I think you were right the first time Lizette! A bit early for the egg-nog... https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cfsizer _ Dave Jousma AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI 49546 616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 12:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** Sorry it should read CFCISER not CISIZER. Had a finger check Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of Lizette Koehler > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 10:42 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors > > Have you tried the CISIZER on https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cfsizer > > > It may have some information for you on this process. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > > Behalf Of Peter > > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 9:25 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: LOGSTREAM sizing factors > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > We are going to deploy a zOS product which writes LOGSTREAM on CF > structure. > > From the performance point of view what are all aspects i need to be > > aware for example dasd space for LOGSTREAM logs, storage sizing , CF > > memory sizing and we are expecting atleast 50 million transaction on > production. > > . > > > > Could you provide me an idea based on which i can size my LOGSTREAM > > > > Peter > > > > > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > > IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL** **DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails** This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors
Sorry it should read CFCISER not CISIZER. Had a finger check Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > Lizette Koehler > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 10:42 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors > > Have you tried the CISIZER on https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cfsizer > > > It may have some information for you on this process. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > > Behalf Of Peter > > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 9:25 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: LOGSTREAM sizing factors > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > We are going to deploy a zOS product which writes LOGSTREAM on CF > structure. > > From the performance point of view what are all aspects i need to be > > aware for example dasd space for LOGSTREAM logs, storage sizing , CF > > memory sizing and we are expecting atleast 50 million transaction on > production. > > . > > > > Could you provide me an idea based on which i can size my LOGSTREAM > > > > Peter > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors
Have you tried the CISIZER on https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cfsizer It may have some information for you on this process. > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > Peter > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 9:25 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: LOGSTREAM sizing factors > > Hello All, > > > We are going to deploy a zOS product which writes LOGSTREAM on CF structure. > From the performance point of view what are all aspects i need to be aware > for example dasd space for LOGSTREAM logs, storage sizing , CF memory sizing > and we are expecting atleast 50 million transaction on production. > . > > Could you provide me an idea based on which i can size my LOGSTREAM > > Peter > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
LOGSTREAM sizing factors
Hello All, We are going to deploy a zOS product which writes LOGSTREAM on CF structure. From the performance point of view what are all aspects i need to be aware for example dasd space for LOGSTREAM logs, storage sizing , CF memory sizing and we are expecting atleast 50 million transaction on production. . Could you provide me an idea based on which i can size my LOGSTREAM Peter -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE
Very interesting! Great job Sam! On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 1:37 PM Sam Golob wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I've just completed a new article which you might find interesting > to read. It is on the Updates page of www.cbttape.org on File 120, as > member BM1912DE. > > The article talks about some newer programs, many of which I have > had a part in writing. In all likelihood, you have not heard about most > or all of them. I hope that you find this article informative, or at > least entertaining. > > Thanks for your support. All the best of everything to all of you. > > Sincerely, Sam > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
A little pre-Christmas diversion...
Something I noticed on the BBC web site this morning... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-50840818/i-was-a-teenage-code-breaker-at-bletchley-park My main take-away from it was "92 years old and still as bright as a button!" I hope I last that well...". Merry Christmas, all Sean -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE
Hi Binyamin AMV"SH, וכל המרבה הרי משובח א פרייליכען חנוכה Regards, David On 2019-12-23 03:23, Binyamin Dissen wrote: > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 02:47:15 -0500 Arthur wrote: > > :>On 22 Dec 2019 12:23:25 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main > :>(Message-ID:) > :>t...@vse2pdf.com (Tony Thigpen) wrote: > > :>>Any way you could just put a copy in a post to this list? > > :>I've read the article. I think Sam made the right decision; > :>I'd be happier if things like that stayed on CBT.` > > It is not a binary choice. It can be both posted and on the CBT tape. > > -- > Binyamin Dissen > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dissensoftware.comdata=02%7C01%7C%7C51b75944606c4ce1514b08d78781758e%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637126862460516764sdata=LtUb%2FZvZxRujKuQYS0Xh4JOQgr9DVSS52gOKaFahoVA%3Dreserved=0 > > Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel > > > Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, > you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. > > I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, > especially those from irresponsible companies. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > . > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IP 0.0.0.0
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 10:12 Joe Monk, wrote: > "0.0.0.0 is non-routable and a typical use in traffic would be in DHCP, in > which an adaptor doesn't have an address assigned yet and the device sends > out a DHCP request from 0.0.0.0 asking to be assigned a proper address." > > PCs dont send DHCP to 0.0.0.0. They send DHCP to 255.255.255.255 ... > broadcast IP. If the DHCP server is off network (as defined by the subnet > mask), then a helper address will be configured to get DHCP to the right > server. > > If it is a windows machine, the DHCP request packet will include the last > assigned IP address, as a way of requesting to keep the existing, which > will be ACKd or NAKd depending. > Yes. My point is that 0.0.0.0 is also a valid /from/ address in DHCP, perhaps if DHCP has not previously been used. It all boils down to needing more information. Any "vulnerability team" that spots traffic they don't understand already has more information. They need to share it :-) Rupert -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IP 0.0.0.0
"0.0.0.0 is non-routable and a typical use in traffic would be in DHCP, in which an adaptor doesn't have an address assigned yet and the device sends out a DHCP request from 0.0.0.0 asking to be assigned a proper address." PCs dont send DHCP to 0.0.0.0. They send DHCP to 255.255.255.255 ... broadcast IP. If the DHCP server is off network (as defined by the subnet mask), then a helper address will be configured to get DHCP to the right server. If it is a windows machine, the DHCP request packet will include the last assigned IP address, as a way of requesting to keep the existing, which will be ACKd or NAKd depending. Joe On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 2:28 AM Rupert Reynolds wrote: > 0.0.0.0 is a special "no address" or "any address", depending on context. > > If a listening server socket binds to 0.0.0.0 then it listens on any > interfaces present, which might be two adaptors with addresses > 192.168.something and 10.something, for example. > > 0.0.0.0 is non-routable and a typical use in traffic would be in DHCP, in > which an adaptor doesn't have an address assigned yet and the device sends > out a DHCP request from 0.0.0.0 asking to be assigned a proper address. > > I'd ask for clarification, myself :-) > > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 07:53 Jake Anderson, > wrote: > > > Hello > > > > Cross posted > > > > Out network vulnerability team has reported that there is a traffic > between > > 0.0.0.0 and LPAR IP. > > > > Does it mean 0.0.0.0 listen to all address and make server open to > internet > > ? > > > > I believe 0.0.0.0 belongs to BPXOINIT(OMVS) > > > > Regards > > Jake > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IP 0.0.0.0
The address 0.0.0.0 is nothing in and of itself to worry about. What you need to worry about are the port numbers to which it is trying to communicate. Joe On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 1:54 AM Jake Anderson wrote: > Hello > > Cross posted > > Out network vulnerability team has reported that there is a traffic between > 0.0.0.0 and LPAR IP. > > Does it mean 0.0.0.0 listen to all address and make server open to internet > ? > > I believe 0.0.0.0 belongs to BPXOINIT(OMVS) > > Regards > Jake > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IP 0.0.0.0
I don't know any of the mainframe conventions and others here will, but my first question would be for clarification of what they mean by 'traffic'. Is it protocol UDP or TCP or some other, if it's TCP is it simply SYN packets (at the start of a TCP connection) without response, or is there a whole sequence for a TCP connection and stream of data? What ports are the source and destination? 'Traffic' without a port or even a protocol name (or number) is about as vague as they can be :-) Rupert On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 08:32 Jake Anderson, wrote: > Hi Rupert > > I understand but any clue why it has traffic with Mainframe IP when it is > not even listening on any application > > On Mon, 23 Dec, 2019, 12:28 PM Rupert Reynolds, > wrote: > > > 0.0.0.0 is a special "no address" or "any address", depending on context. > > > > If a listening server socket binds to 0.0.0.0 then it listens on any > > interfaces present, which might be two adaptors with addresses > > 192.168.something and 10.something, for example. > > > > 0.0.0.0 is non-routable and a typical use in traffic would be in DHCP, in > > which an adaptor doesn't have an address assigned yet and the device > sends > > out a DHCP request from 0.0.0.0 asking to be assigned a proper address. > > > > I'd ask for clarification, myself :-) > > > > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 07:53 Jake Anderson, > > wrote: > > > > > Hello > > > > > > Cross posted > > > > > > Out network vulnerability team has reported that there is a traffic > > between > > > 0.0.0.0 and LPAR IP. > > > > > > Does it mean 0.0.0.0 listen to all address and make server open to > > internet > > > ? > > > > > > I believe 0.0.0.0 belongs to BPXOINIT(OMVS) > > > > > > Regards > > > Jake > > > > > > -- > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IP 0.0.0.0
Hi Rupert I understand but any clue why it has traffic with Mainframe IP when it is not even listening on any application On Mon, 23 Dec, 2019, 12:28 PM Rupert Reynolds, wrote: > 0.0.0.0 is a special "no address" or "any address", depending on context. > > If a listening server socket binds to 0.0.0.0 then it listens on any > interfaces present, which might be two adaptors with addresses > 192.168.something and 10.something, for example. > > 0.0.0.0 is non-routable and a typical use in traffic would be in DHCP, in > which an adaptor doesn't have an address assigned yet and the device sends > out a DHCP request from 0.0.0.0 asking to be assigned a proper address. > > I'd ask for clarification, myself :-) > > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 07:53 Jake Anderson, > wrote: > > > Hello > > > > Cross posted > > > > Out network vulnerability team has reported that there is a traffic > between > > 0.0.0.0 and LPAR IP. > > > > Does it mean 0.0.0.0 listen to all address and make server open to > internet > > ? > > > > I believe 0.0.0.0 belongs to BPXOINIT(OMVS) > > > > Regards > > Jake > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IP 0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0 is a special "no address" or "any address", depending on context. If a listening server socket binds to 0.0.0.0 then it listens on any interfaces present, which might be two adaptors with addresses 192.168.something and 10.something, for example. 0.0.0.0 is non-routable and a typical use in traffic would be in DHCP, in which an adaptor doesn't have an address assigned yet and the device sends out a DHCP request from 0.0.0.0 asking to be assigned a proper address. I'd ask for clarification, myself :-) On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 07:53 Jake Anderson, wrote: > Hello > > Cross posted > > Out network vulnerability team has reported that there is a traffic between > 0.0.0.0 and LPAR IP. > > Does it mean 0.0.0.0 listen to all address and make server open to internet > ? > > I believe 0.0.0.0 belongs to BPXOINIT(OMVS) > > Regards > Jake > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: CBT File 120 - A new article - Member BM1912DE
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 02:47:15 -0500 Arthur wrote: :>On 22 Dec 2019 12:23:25 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main :>(Message-ID:) :>t...@vse2pdf.com (Tony Thigpen) wrote: :>>Any way you could just put a copy in a post to this list? :>I've read the article. I think Sam made the right decision; :>I'd be happier if things like that stayed on CBT.` It is not a binary choice. It can be both posted and on the CBT tape. -- Binyamin Dissen http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
