Re: zCX Provisioning Problem

2021-11-30 Thread At: Http://Doodle.Com/Poll/E5In4Utu77Dspg42
These are job streams that are automatically created by the workflow 
provisioning. I have had no hand in creating the contents of them. So I 
would've expected that they'd "just work". 

This is the information provided with the ADCD z/OS 2.4 May Edition:

"The data class CXDC is defined to allow larger than four Gigabyte dataset 
allocation. With this data class and the accompanying storage group and class, 
a dataset can be allocated on the provided SMS managed volume D4ZCX1. The ACS 
routines are used during provisioning of zCX Container."

Data class Storage Group and Storage class for zCX Containers reference 
purposes:

CXDC - Data Class for zCX
CXROOTSG - Storage Group
CXROOTSC - Storage class
D4ZCX1 - Volume size is 18,000 cylinders and defined in CXROOTSG (Storage Group)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: zCX Provisioning Problem

2021-11-30 Thread Seymour J Metz
I USER a catalog alias? What is the definition of CXROOTSC? What do your ACS 
rules do with USER.ZCX.SNAZCX.ZFS?

"80 Explanation:Define data set with extended format information is not valid 
for a non-SMS data set."

BTW, do you really mean "(3)" and not "(3 3)"?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Neale Ferguson [ne...@sinenomine.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2021 4:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: zCX Provisioning Problem

I am attempting to run the zCX provisioning workflow. It gets to the step where 
it allocates then mounts a ZFS system. However, the DEFINE CLUSTER is failing 
using:

  DEFINE CLUSTER -
 (NAME(USER.ZCX.SNAZCX.ZFS) -
 MEGABYTES(4095 1000) -
 STORCLAS(CXROOTSC)   -
 DATACLAS(CXDC) -
 ZFS -
 SHAREOPTIONS(3))

It fails with:

IDC3506I REQUIRED VOLUMES AND/OR DEVICETYPES HAVE BEEN OMITTED
IDC3003I FUNCTION TERMINATED. CONDITION CODE IS 12

If I change the DEFINE to include a VOL() definition:

  DEFINE CLUSTER -
 (NAME(USER.ZCX.SNAZCX.ZFS) -
 MEGABYTES(4095 1000) -
 STORCLAS(CXROOTSC)   -
 DATACLAS(CXDC) –
 VOL(D4ZCX1) -
 ZFS -
 SHAREOPTIONS(3))

It fails with:

IDC3014I CATALOG ERROR
IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 48 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLAT-80

I am unable to work out what IGG0CLAT-80 is or why it’s failing. I am unsure 
why VOL is required anyway, wouldn’t the STORCLAS/DATACLAS let the system pick 
for itself? Might that volume not have enough free space? I would’ve hoped that 
the generated workflow would “just work” with the right parameters. So I assume 
one of my parameter is wrong but I didn’t see anywhere I could plug in a volume 
name into the workflow parameters.

Neale


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: zCX Provisioning Problem

2021-11-30 Thread Dave Jousma
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 05:54:25 -0600, Dave Jousma  wrote:

>On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:43:55 +, Neale Ferguson  
>wrote:
>
>
>>It fails with:
>>
>>IDC3014I CATALOG ERROR
>>IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 48 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLAT-80
>>
>>I am unable to work out what IGG0CLAT-80 is or why it’s failing. I am unsure 
>>why VOL is required anyway, wouldn’t the STORCLAS/DATACLAS let the system 
>>pick for itself? Might that volume not have enough free space? I would’ve 
>>hoped that the generated workflow would “just work” with the right 
>>parameters. So I assume one of my parameter is wrong but I didn’t see 
>>anywhere I could plug in a volume name into the workflow parameters.
>>
>
>80 Explanation: Define data set with extended format   
>   information is not valid for a non-SMS data set.

Does your dataclass specify extended format?   Or reduce your dataset 
allocation to something less than 65K tracks and try it.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: zCX Provisioning Problem

2021-11-30 Thread Dave Jousma
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:43:55 +, Neale Ferguson  wrote:


>It fails with:
>
>IDC3014I CATALOG ERROR
>IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 48 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLAT-80
>
>I am unable to work out what IGG0CLAT-80 is or why it’s failing. I am unsure 
>why VOL is required anyway, wouldn’t the STORCLAS/DATACLAS let the system pick 
>for itself? Might that volume not have enough free space? I would’ve hoped 
>that the generated workflow would “just work” with the right parameters. So I 
>assume one of my parameter is wrong but I didn’t see anywhere I could plug in 
>a volume name into the workflow parameters.
>

80 Explanation: Define data set with extended format   
   information is not valid for a non-SMS data set.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


zCX Provisioning Problem

2021-11-30 Thread Neale Ferguson
I am attempting to run the zCX provisioning workflow. It gets to the step where 
it allocates then mounts a ZFS system. However, the DEFINE CLUSTER is failing 
using:

  DEFINE CLUSTER -
 (NAME(USER.ZCX.SNAZCX.ZFS) -
 MEGABYTES(4095 1000) -
 STORCLAS(CXROOTSC)   -
 DATACLAS(CXDC) -
 ZFS -
 SHAREOPTIONS(3))

It fails with:

IDC3506I REQUIRED VOLUMES AND/OR DEVICETYPES HAVE BEEN OMITTED
IDC3003I FUNCTION TERMINATED. CONDITION CODE IS 12

If I change the DEFINE to include a VOL() definition:

  DEFINE CLUSTER -
 (NAME(USER.ZCX.SNAZCX.ZFS) -
 MEGABYTES(4095 1000) -
 STORCLAS(CXROOTSC)   -
 DATACLAS(CXDC) –
 VOL(D4ZCX1) -
 ZFS -
 SHAREOPTIONS(3))

It fails with:

IDC3014I CATALOG ERROR
IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 48 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLAT-80

I am unable to work out what IGG0CLAT-80 is or why it’s failing. I am unsure 
why VOL is required anyway, wouldn’t the STORCLAS/DATACLAS let the system pick 
for itself? Might that volume not have enough free space? I would’ve hoped that 
the generated workflow would “just work” with the right parameters. So I assume 
one of my parameter is wrong but I didn’t see anywhere I could plug in a volume 
name into the workflow parameters.

Neale


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN