Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 79 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Oct 4 08:42:50 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 8.86% |7 | 9.36% |66764 | hsan...@isdg.net 3.80% |3 | 9.16% |65302 | david.bl...@emc.com 6.33% |5 | 4.74% |33801 | john-i...@jck.com 5.06% |4 | 5.48% |39069 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 3.80% |3 | 4.65% |33150 | k...@bbn.com 5.06% |4 | 3.37% |24045 | barryle...@computer.org 3.80% |3 | 4.42% |31537 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 5.06% |4 | 3.15% |22491 | m...@sandelman.ca 3.80% |3 | 4.01% |28575 | superu...@gmail.com 3.80% |3 | 3.88% |27640 | gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com 3.80% |3 | 2.98% |21246 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 2.53% |2 | 4.17% |29754 | bmann...@isi.edu 3.80% |3 | 2.46% |17558 | s...@sobco.com 1.27% |1 | 4.21% |30050 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 2.53% |2 | 2.92% |20858 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.53% |2 | 2.29% |16353 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 2.53% |2 | 2.07% |14791 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 2.53% |2 | 1.92% |13699 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.53% |2 | 1.82% |13001 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.53% |2 | 1.80% |12824 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.53% |2 | 1.78% |12667 | alexandru.petre...@gmail.com 1.27% |1 | 2.77% |19748 | jdr...@juniper.net 1.27% |1 | 1.36% | 9707 | o...@nlnetlabs.nl 1.27% |1 | 1.28% | 9155 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 1.27% |1 | 1.25% | 8881 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.27% |1 | 1.22% | 8667 | b...@nostrum.com 1.27% |1 | 1.21% | 8618 | huub.van.helvo...@huawei.com 1.27% |1 | 1.15% | 8225 | d...@cridland.net 1.27% |1 | 1.12% | 8023 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.27% |1 | 1.00% | 7126 | joe...@bogus.com 1.27% |1 | 0.95% | 6809 | ietf...@comcast.net 1.27% |1 | 0.94% | 6715 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.27% |1 | 0.93% | 6657 | sc...@kitterman.com 1.27% |1 | 0.88% | 6245 | ves...@tana.it 1.27% |1 | 0.86% | 6150 | morrowc.li...@gmail.com 1.27% |1 | 0.85% | 6062 | jo...@taugh.com 1.27% |1 | 0.85% | 6059 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 1.27% |1 | 0.73% | 5188 | j...@nlnetlabs.nl +--++--+ 100.00% | 79 |100.00% | 713210 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Oct 4 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ +--++--+
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 127 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 27 01:00:00 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.30% |8 | 5.79% |56383 | s...@resistor.net 5.51% |7 | 4.93% |47948 | ra...@psg.com 5.51% |7 | 4.71% |45812 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 4.72% |6 | 5.27% |51314 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 3.94% |5 | 5.08% |49479 | hal...@gmail.com 4.72% |6 | 3.67% |35699 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 3.15% |4 | 4.72% |45919 | david.bl...@emc.com 3.15% |4 | 3.02% |29384 | scott.b...@gmail.com 3.15% |4 | 2.64% |25725 | john-i...@jck.com 3.15% |4 | 2.55% |24778 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.36% |3 | 3.27% |31813 | ya...@juniper.net 3.15% |4 | 2.07% |20167 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 2.36% |3 | 2.55% |24814 | b...@nostrum.com 2.36% |3 | 2.46% |23902 | huit...@microsoft.com 2.36% |3 | 2.41% |23452 | nar...@us.ibm.com 2.36% |3 | 2.10% |20449 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.36% |3 | 1.96% |19122 | rog...@gmail.com 2.36% |3 | 1.83% |17821 | m...@mnot.net 2.36% |3 | 1.80% |17559 | ch...@ietf.org 1.57% |2 | 2.23% |21665 | tglas...@earthlink.net 1.57% |2 | 2.11% |20574 | morrowc.li...@gmail.com 1.57% |2 | 1.87% |18215 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 1.57% |2 | 1.46% |14200 | josh.howl...@ja.net 1.57% |2 | 1.45% |14107 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.57% |2 | 1.31% |12714 | p...@cypherpunks.ca 1.57% |2 | 1.27% |12369 | har...@alvestrand.no 1.57% |2 | 1.23% |11987 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.57% |2 | 1.21% |11813 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.79% |1 | 1.87% |18157 | jouni.nos...@gmail.com 0.79% |1 | 1.78% |17300 | dafa...@yahoo.com 0.79% |1 | 1.47% |14339 | he...@pobox.com 0.79% |1 | 1.28% |12470 | bcla...@cisco.com 0.79% |1 | 1.06% |10312 | ttau...@1-4-5.net 0.79% |1 | 0.98% | 9581 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 0.79% |1 | 0.94% | 9137 | rifaat.i...@gmail.com 0.79% |1 | 0.94% | 9103 | k...@chrysler.com 0.79% |1 | 0.92% | 8946 | d...@cridland.net 0.79% |1 | 0.87% | 8433 | gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com 0.79% |1 | 0.81% | 7926 | cgriffi...@gmail.com 0.79% |1 | 0.80% | 7780 | nomcom-ch...@ietf.org 0.79% |1 | 0.79% | 7693 | tglas...@certichron.com 0.79% |1 | 0.77% | 7468 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.79% |1 | 0.73% | 7148 | b...@google.com 0.79% |1 | 0.73% | 7113 | l...@netapp.com 0.79% |1 | 0.73% | 7109 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 0.79% |1 | 0.70% | 6860 | c...@tzi.org 0.79% |1 | 0.70% | 6846 | joe...@bogus.com 0.79% |1 | 0.62% | 6070 | jo...@taugh.com 0.79% |1 | 0.62% | 6051 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 0.79% |1 | 0.61% | 5892 | st...@shinkuro.com 0.79% |1 | 0.60% | 5874 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.79% |1 | 0.59% | 5745 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.79% |1 | 0.58% | 5666 | sust...@250bpm.com 0.79% |1 | 0.53% | 5176 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 127 |100.00% | 973379 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 20 14:38:57 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ +--++--+
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 20 14:39:19 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ +--++--+
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 209 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 20 14:42:33 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 3.83% |8 | 7.47% | 133327 | o...@nlnetlabs.nl 5.74% | 12 | 4.92% |87860 | john-i...@jck.com 3.83% |8 | 4.58% |81774 | hal...@gmail.com 4.31% |9 | 3.11% |55565 | a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk 4.31% |9 | 3.10% |55274 | jo...@taugh.com 3.83% |8 | 3.11% |55477 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.83% |8 | 3.09% |55075 | scott.b...@gmail.com 3.83% |8 | 3.06% |54562 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 3.83% |8 | 2.93% |52269 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.39% |5 | 3.31% |59038 | gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com 2.87% |6 | 2.25% |40200 | g...@net-zen.net 2.87% |6 | 1.82% |32472 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 2.39% |5 | 2.23% |39739 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 2.39% |5 | 2.20% |39268 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.48% |1 | 3.87% |69051 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.91% |4 | 1.80% |32202 | d...@cridland.net 1.91% |4 | 1.58% |28124 | michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de 1.91% |4 | 1.44% |25786 | c...@tzi.org 1.91% |4 | 1.12% |19974 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.44% |3 | 1.36% |24203 | s...@resistor.net 1.44% |3 | 1.17% |20945 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.44% |3 | 1.15% |20567 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.48% |1 | 2.09% |37351 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 1.44% |3 | 0.97% |17323 | ch...@ietf.org 0.96% |2 | 1.21% |21665 | tglas...@earthlink.net 0.96% |2 | 1.17% |20916 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 0.96% |2 | 1.10% |19713 | alan.d.cl...@telchemy.com 0.96% |2 | 1.09% |19469 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.96% |2 | 1.02% |18215 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 0.96% |2 | 0.98% |17570 | tobias.gond...@gondrom.org 0.96% |2 | 0.96% |17181 | bdick...@verisign.com 0.96% |2 | 0.88% |15680 | war...@kumari.net 0.96% |2 | 0.76% |13523 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.96% |2 | 0.75% |13443 | barryle...@computer.org 0.96% |2 | 0.75% |13378 | st...@shinkuro.com 0.96% |2 | 0.74% |13136 | jul...@braga.eti.br 0.96% |2 | 0.73% |13097 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.96% |2 | 0.72% |12895 | s...@sobco.com 0.96% |2 | 0.69% |12369 | har...@alvestrand.no 0.48% |1 | 1.17% |20821 | aal...@blackberry.com 0.96% |2 | 0.67% |12047 | d...@xpasc.com 0.96% |2 | 0.64% |11467 | m...@sap.com 0.48% |1 | 1.05% |18809 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.48% |1 | 1.02% |18157 | jouni.nos...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.93% |16540 | j...@freedesktop.org 0.48% |1 | 0.77% |13689 | glen.wi...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.72% |12776 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.68% |12177 | droma...@avaya.com 0.48% |1 | 0.67% |12034 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.48% |1 | 0.67% |12022 | g...@gtwassociates.com 0.48% |1 | 0.66% |11779 | i...@thomasclausen.org 0.48% |1 | 0.66% |11719 | gda...@au.logicalis.com 0.48% |1 | 0.60% |10763 | bow...@web9.com 0.48% |1 | 0.55% | 9897 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 0.48% |1 | 0.55% | 9747 | klen...@jck.com 0.48% |1 | 0.52% | 9271 | da...@tcb.net 0.48% |1 | 0.51% | 9182 | g...@algebras.org 0.48% |1 | 0.51% | 9103 | k...@chrysler.com 0.48% |1 | 0.51% | 9102 | pau...@packetizer.com 0.48% |1 | 0.50% | 8902 | b...@nostrum.com 0.48% |1 | 0.49% | 8699 | l...@cisco.com 0.48% |1 | 0.48% | 8606 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.47% | 8360 | nwea...@icsi.berkeley.edu 0.48% |1 | 0.45% | 8102 | d...@dcrocker.net 0.48% |1 | 0.43% | 7758 | ptha...@broadcom.com 0.48% |1 | 0.43% | 7652 | gsalg...@cisco.com 0.48% |1 | 0.42% | 7448 | t...@att.com 0.48% |1 | 0.41% | 7313 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.40% | 7211 | agma...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.40% | 7117 | l...@netapp.com 0.48% |1 | 0.39% | 7031 | a...@nostrum.com 0.48% |1 | 0.38% | 6833 | josh.howl...@ja.net 0.48% |1 | 0.38% | 6757 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.48% |1 | 0.36% | 6440 | m...@sandelman.ca 0.48% |1 | 0.36% | 6397 | joe...@bogus.com 0.48% |1 | 0.34% | 6051 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 0.48% |1 | 0.33% | 5939 | ru...@riw.us 0.48% |1 | 0.32% | 5666 | sust...@250bpm.com 0.48% |1 | 0.31% | 5563 | geoff.i...@mulligan.com 0.48% |1 | 0.30% | 5354 | majid.mjd...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.29% | 5203 | ra...@psg.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 209 |100.00% | 1785180 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 353 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 13 00:53:04 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 11.33% | 40 | 9.28% | 281400 | ted.le...@nominum.com 6.80% | 24 | 8.08% | 244815 | hal...@gmail.com 2.55% |9 | 3.87% | 117217 | lore...@google.com 1.98% |7 | 3.78% | 114498 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 3.12% | 11 | 2.44% |73922 | s...@resistor.net 1.13% |4 | 4.22% | 128021 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.55% |9 | 1.90% |57637 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.27% |8 | 1.89% |57219 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.27% |8 | 1.82% |55303 | scott.b...@gmail.com 2.27% |8 | 1.82% |55077 | ty...@mit.edu 2.55% |9 | 1.51% |45914 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.98% |7 | 1.89% |57339 | jo...@taugh.com 1.70% |6 | 2.07% |62717 | superu...@gmail.com 1.98% |7 | 1.74% |52721 | john-i...@jck.com 0.85% |3 | 2.78% |84301 | o...@delong.com 1.98% |7 | 1.53% |46463 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 1.70% |6 | 1.69% |51128 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.70% |6 | 1.51% |45915 | joe...@bogus.com 0.57% |2 | 2.61% |78993 | zhangfa...@huawei.com 1.70% |6 | 1.31% |39590 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.70% |6 | 1.29% |39128 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.70% |6 | 1.27% |38449 | sc...@kitterman.com 1.70% |6 | 1.12% |34088 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 1.42% |5 | 1.35% |40829 | jab...@hopcount.ca 1.42% |5 | 1.18% |35757 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 0.85% |3 | 1.71% |51725 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 1.42% |5 | 1.09% |32975 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.42% |5 | 1.04% |31548 | d...@dotat.at 1.13% |4 | 1.19% |36054 | p...@frobbit.se 1.13% |4 | 1.14% |34686 | daedu...@btconnect.com 1.13% |4 | 1.11% |33768 | o...@ogud.com 1.13% |4 | 0.91% |27692 | p...@nohats.ca 1.13% |4 | 0.91% |27544 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.13% |4 | 0.90% |27200 | jmamo...@gmail.com 1.13% |4 | 0.89% |26945 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.13% |4 | 0.85% |25864 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.85% |3 | 0.81% |24629 | nwea...@icsi.berkeley.edu 0.85% |3 | 0.78% |23731 | tramm...@tik.ee.ethz.ch 0.85% |3 | 0.68% |20746 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.85% |3 | 0.64% |19344 | rog...@gmail.com 0.85% |3 | 0.64% |19334 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.85% |3 | 0.62% |18716 | l...@cisco.com 0.85% |3 | 0.60% |18143 | d...@xpasc.com 0.57% |2 | 0.67% |20167 | pe...@akayla.com 0.57% |2 | 0.57% |17181 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 0.57% |2 | 0.49% |14714 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 0.57% |2 | 0.48% |14543 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.57% |2 | 0.47% |14263 | interf...@gmail.com 0.57% |2 | 0.46% |13938 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.57% |2 | 0.46% |13895 | d...@virtualized.org 0.57% |2 | 0.45% |13545 | p...@cypherpunks.ca 0.57% |2 | 0.44% |13476 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 0.28% |1 | 0.72% |21968 | agma...@gmail.com 0.57% |2 | 0.44% |13310 | st...@shinkuro.com 0.57% |2 | 0.42% |12802 | m...@sandelman.ca 0.28% |1 | 0.68% |20521 | jmp...@cisco.com 0.57% |2 | 0.39% |11779 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.57% |2 | 0.38% |11424 | to...@isi.edu 0.28% |1 | 0.61% |18611 | gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com 0.28% |1 | 0.47% |14313 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.28% |1 | 0.46% |14077 | dan-i...@danyork.org 0.28% |1 | 0.41% |12337 | j...@freedesktop.org 0.28% |1 | 0.40% |12225 | d...@cridland.net 0.28% |1 | 0.40% |12175 | mar...@millnert.se 0.28% |1 | 0.39% |11854 | stefan.win...@restena.lu 0.28% |1 | 0.36% |10928 | jo...@iecc.com 0.28% |1 | 0.36% |10824 | r...@ipv.sx 0.28% |1 | 0.35% |10630 | cb.li...@gmail.com 0.28% |1 | 0.35% |10473 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 0.28% |1 | 0.34% |10363 | markzzzsm...@yahoo.com.au 0.28% |1 | 0.33% | 9898 | r.e.sonnev...@sonnection.nl 0.28% |1 | 0.31% | 9522 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.28% |1 | 0.29% | 8702 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.28% |1 | 0.29% | 8698 | anshumanpra...@gmail.com 0.28% |1 | 0.28% | 8635 | tb...@textuality.com 0.28% |1 | 0.27% | 8260 | alan.b.johns...@gmail.com 0.28% |1 | 0.27% | 8153 | vinay...@gmail.com 0.28% |1 | 0.27% | 8129 | lsav...@us.ibm.com 0.28% |1 | 0.25% | 7672 | jgu...@csc.com 0.28% |1 | 0.24% | 7229 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.28% |1 | 0.23% | 7118 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.28% |1 | 0.23% | 7061 | ferna...@gont.com.ar 0.28% |1 | 0.23% | 6866 | v6...@globis.net 0.28% |1 |
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 149 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 6 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.38% | 11 | 6.82% |81747 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 5.37% |8 | 4.69% |56229 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 4.70% |7 | 5.21% |62468 | hal...@gmail.com 4.70% |7 | 3.92% |46996 | john-i...@jck.com 4.03% |6 | 3.64% |43631 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 4.03% |6 | 3.42% |40977 | sc...@kitterman.com 2.01% |3 | 5.13% |61457 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 3.36% |5 | 3.71% |44471 | hsan...@isdg.net 4.03% |6 | 2.66% |31842 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 3.36% |5 | 2.91% |34919 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 3.36% |5 | 2.62% |31419 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.68% |4 | 3.01% |36091 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.68% |4 | 2.48% |29753 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 2.68% |4 | 2.40% |28798 | s...@sobco.com 2.68% |4 | 2.32% |27833 | barryle...@computer.org 2.68% |4 | 2.08% |24942 | scott.b...@gmail.com 2.01% |3 | 1.87% |22420 | s...@resistor.net 2.01% |3 | 1.86% |22324 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.34% |2 | 2.23% |26689 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 2.01% |3 | 1.48% |17790 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.34% |2 | 2.06% |24720 | lore...@google.com 1.34% |2 | 2.05% |24588 | t...@att.com 1.34% |2 | 1.88% |22482 | o...@nlnetlabs.nl 1.34% |2 | 1.87% |22376 | vinay...@gmail.com 1.34% |2 | 1.55% |18589 | superu...@gmail.com 1.34% |2 | 1.49% |17853 | s...@harvard.edu 1.34% |2 | 1.29% |15428 | esua...@fcaglp.fcaglp.unlp.edu.ar 1.34% |2 | 0.91% |10856 | p...@frobbit.se 1.34% |2 | 0.89% |10628 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 1.34% |2 | 0.86% |10280 | ra...@psg.com 0.67% |1 | 1.45% |17393 | agma...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 1.41% |16907 | david.bi...@orange.com 0.67% |1 | 1.13% |13509 | jmp...@cisco.com 0.67% |1 | 1.13% |13508 | michelle.cot...@icann.org 0.67% |1 | 1.04% |12503 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.67% |1 | 0.96% |11501 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.92% |10996 | mary.h.bar...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.82% | 9880 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.67% |1 | 0.69% | 8254 | schl...@theworld.com 0.67% |1 | 0.68% | 8156 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.67% |1 | 0.68% | 8139 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.67% |1 | 0.68% | 8134 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.68% | 8128 | afab...@hotmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.67% | 8055 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.67% |1 | 0.61% | 7368 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 0.67% |1 | 0.59% | 7091 | pe...@akayla.com 0.67% |1 | 0.58% | 6967 | lly...@civil-tongue.net 0.67% |1 | 0.57% | 6885 | g...@space.net 0.67% |1 | 0.55% | 6541 | william.mcc...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.54% | 6458 | martin.thom...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.50% | 5986 | jo...@taugh.com 0.67% |1 | 0.50% | 5949 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.67% |1 | 0.49% | 5851 | bra...@isi.edu 0.67% |1 | 0.48% | 5740 | tglas...@earthlink.net 0.67% |1 | 0.48% | 5737 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.67% |1 | 0.47% | 5667 | cy...@daboo.name 0.67% |1 | 0.47% | 5649 | d...@virtualized.org 0.67% |1 | 0.47% | 5646 | ch...@ietf.org 0.67% |1 | 0.41% | 4878 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 149 |100.00% | 1198072 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 140 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 30 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.43% |9 | 6.04% |76439 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 2.86% |4 | 7.42% |93857 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 4.29% |6 | 5.58% |70653 | ron.even@gmail.com 4.29% |6 | 5.11% |64709 | hal...@gmail.com 3.57% |5 | 4.80% |60784 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.29% |6 | 3.98% |50359 | hsan...@isdg.net 4.29% |6 | 3.42% |43301 | sc...@kitterman.com 4.29% |6 | 2.82% |35654 | s...@resistor.net 3.57% |5 | 2.72% |34437 | jo...@taugh.com 2.86% |4 | 3.23% |40931 | daedu...@btconnect.com 3.57% |5 | 2.46% |31093 | jelte.jan...@sidn.nl 2.86% |4 | 2.69% |34006 | john-i...@jck.com 2.86% |4 | 2.16% |27383 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.14% |3 | 2.14% |27092 | scott.b...@gmail.com 2.14% |3 | 2.02% |25568 | jgu...@csc.com 2.14% |3 | 1.71% |21592 | bmann...@isi.edu 2.14% |3 | 1.62% |20451 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.43% |2 | 2.13% |27011 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.43% |2 | 1.52% |19222 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 1.43% |2 | 1.46% |18515 | ma...@isc.org 1.43% |2 | 1.45% |18410 | l...@pi.nu 1.43% |2 | 1.45% |18341 | mach.c...@huawei.com 1.43% |2 | 1.35% |17077 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.43% |2 | 1.27% |16094 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 1.43% |2 | 1.20% |15192 | jordi.pa...@consulintel.es 1.43% |2 | 1.18% |14974 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.43% |2 | 1.13% |14252 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 1.37% |17324 | jouni.nos...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 1.31% |16603 | b...@nostrum.com 0.71% |1 | 1.26% |15924 | michelle.cot...@icann.org 0.71% |1 | 1.08% |13725 | sprom...@unina.it 0.71% |1 | 0.91% |11534 | mary.h.bar...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.90% |11408 | emcmu...@computer.org 0.71% |1 | 0.90% |11372 | bernard_ab...@hotmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.89% |11255 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.71% |1 | 0.85% |10702 | p...@frobbit.se 0.71% |1 | 0.83% |10452 | ero...@cisco.com 0.71% |1 | 0.70% | 8837 | sanjay.mis...@verizon.com 0.71% |1 | 0.69% | 8769 | hadriel.kap...@oracle.com 0.71% |1 | 0.69% | 8741 | sgund...@cisco.com 0.71% |1 | 0.66% | 8347 | aal...@blackberry.com 0.71% |1 | 0.65% | 8235 | shem_...@operamail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.64% | 8038 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 0.71% |1 | 0.62% | 7837 | ietf2d...@davearonson.com 0.71% |1 | 0.61% | 7772 | d...@cridland.net 0.71% |1 | 0.60% | 7554 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.60% | 7541 | superu...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.59% | 7523 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 0.71% |1 | 0.56% | 7027 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.71% |1 | 0.55% | 7016 | c...@it.uc3m.es 0.71% |1 | 0.55% | 6988 | g...@amsl.com 0.71% |1 | 0.55% | 6959 | bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com 0.71% |1 | 0.53% | 6701 | c...@tzi.org 0.71% |1 | 0.52% | 6598 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.71% |1 | 0.52% | 6563 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.71% |1 | 0.51% | 6516 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.51% | 6490 | damascene.joachimpil...@verizon.com 0.71% |1 | 0.51% | 6398 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.71% |1 | 0.50% | 6389 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.71% |1 | 0.48% | 6099 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.48% | 6070 | barryle...@computer.org 0.71% |1 | 0.46% | 5880 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.71% |1 | 0.46% | 5861 | swm...@swm.pp.se 0.71% |1 | 0.46% | 5798 | j...@jlc.net 0.71% |1 | 0.41% | 5152 | i...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 140 |100.00% | 1265395 | Total
Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)
Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org writes: The general point is that the new people whom we want to draw in as productive participants will be watching how we treat each other and deciding whether they want to wade into that pool. It's not just new people watching and being turned off. There are plenty of old timers who get turned off and I doubt I'm alone in thinking very carefully these days whether I want to wade into any particular discussion. Thomas
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 272 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 23 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.88% | 16 | 5.06% | 118905 | d...@dcrocker.net 5.51% | 15 | 5.10% | 119919 | sc...@kitterman.com 4.78% | 13 | 4.71% | 110859 | hadriel.kap...@oracle.com 4.41% | 12 | 4.14% |97312 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 4.04% | 11 | 4.03% |94724 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 3.68% | 10 | 2.77% |65248 | p...@frobbit.se 2.94% |8 | 2.96% |69522 | john-i...@jck.com 3.31% |9 | 2.41% |56561 | jo...@taugh.com 2.94% |8 | 2.73% |64211 | ma...@isc.org 2.94% |8 | 2.65% |62387 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 2.57% |7 | 2.92% |68721 | superu...@gmail.com 2.94% |8 | 2.15% |50470 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 2.21% |6 | 2.42% |57003 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.57% |7 | 1.99% |46750 | to...@isi.edu 2.57% |7 | 1.96% |46054 | sust...@250bpm.com 2.21% |6 | 2.26% |53090 | hal...@gmail.com 1.84% |5 | 2.36% |55546 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.10% |3 | 2.99% |70357 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.21% |6 | 1.86% |43651 | s...@resistor.net 1.84% |5 | 1.67% |39285 | d...@virtualized.org 1.10% |3 | 2.37% |55685 | lionel.mor...@orange.com 1.47% |4 | 1.70% |40054 | jgu...@csc.com 1.10% |3 | 1.98% |46464 | stefan.win...@restena.lu 0.37% |1 | 2.41% |56657 | sgin...@amsl.com 1.10% |3 | 1.52% |35764 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.10% |3 | 1.26% |29653 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 1.10% |3 | 1.13% |26577 | l...@cisco.com 1.10% |3 | 1.03% |24218 | mo...@network-heretics.com 1.10% |3 | 0.93% |21961 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.10% |3 | 0.86% |20116 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.74% |2 | 1.03% |24151 | b...@nostrum.com 0.74% |2 | 0.86% |20259 | vinay...@gmail.com 0.74% |2 | 0.81% |19089 | morrowc.li...@gmail.com 0.74% |2 | 0.70% |16537 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.74% |2 | 0.68% |15909 | o...@ogud.com 0.37% |1 | 1.01% |23832 | zhangfa...@huawei.com 0.74% |2 | 0.64% |14977 | barryle...@computer.org 0.74% |2 | 0.63% |14901 | c...@tzi.org 0.74% |2 | 0.63% |14884 | jelte.jan...@sidn.nl 0.74% |2 | 0.58% |13716 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.37% |1 | 0.95% |22357 | car...@qosient.com 0.74% |2 | 0.56% |13284 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.74% |2 | 0.56% |13095 | h...@cs.columbia.edu 0.74% |2 | 0.55% |12920 | ka...@mit.edu 0.74% |2 | 0.54% |12636 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.37% |1 | 0.60% |14113 | flu...@cisco.com 0.37% |1 | 0.59% |13830 | g...@ninebynine.org 0.37% |1 | 0.53% |12564 | sant9...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.51% |11888 | lore...@google.com 0.37% |1 | 0.48% |11270 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.46% |10716 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.44% |10451 | petit...@acm.org 0.37% |1 | 0.44% |10329 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.37% |1 | 0.42% | 9832 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.37% |1 | 0.40% | 9429 | dotz...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.37% | 8698 | mbaug...@cisco.com 0.37% |1 | 0.36% | 8564 | turchanyi.g...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.36% | 8497 | t...@att.com 0.37% |1 | 0.36% | 8370 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.37% |1 | 0.35% | 8218 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.37% |1 | 0.34% | 8006 | aal...@blackberry.com 0.37% |1 | 0.33% | 7828 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 0.37% |1 | 0.33% | 7784 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 0.37% |1 | 0.32% | 7619 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.32% | 7531 | khalil.yac...@atecgrp.com 0.37% |1 | 0.30% | 7094 | hil...@cursive.net 0.37% |1 | 0.30% | 7084 | d...@dotat.at 0.37% |1 | 0.30% | 7083 | j...@jlc.net 0.37% |1 | 0.30% | 7049 | ietf...@comcast.net 0.37% |1 | 0.30% | 7013 | e...@google.com 0.37% |1 | 0.29% | 6800 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.29% | 6785 | n...@cryptonector.com 0.37% |1 | 0.29% | 6750 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.28% | 6535 | aser...@lacnic.net 0.37% |1 | 0.28% | 6521 | berti...@bwijnen.net 0.37% |1 | 0.27% | 6460 | j...@apple.com 0.37% |1 | 0.27% | 6313 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.37% |1 | 0.27% | 6300 | o...@delong.com 0.37% |1 | 0.27% | 6295 | jh...@cmu.edu 0.37% |1 | 0.27% | 6260 | uma.chund...@ericsson.com 0.37% |1 | 0.26% | 6192 | masin...@adobe.com 0.37% |1 | 0.26% | 6050 | d...@xpasc.com 0.37% |1 | 0.25% | 5951 | bra...@isi.edu 0.37% |1 | 0.25% | 5920 | ves...@tana.it 0.37% |1 | 0.25% | 5833
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 125 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 16 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.20% |9 | 10.47% | 108804 | hal...@gmail.com 5.60% |7 | 8.58% |89136 | hadriel.kap...@oracle.com 7.20% |9 | 6.54% |67899 | ted.le...@nominum.com 6.40% |8 | 6.59% |68454 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 5.60% |7 | 5.04% |52375 | s...@resistor.net 4.00% |5 | 5.79% |60106 | har...@alvestrand.no 4.80% |6 | 3.58% |37229 | c...@tzi.org 3.20% |4 | 3.71% |38560 | g...@ninebynine.org 3.20% |4 | 2.97% |30814 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 3.20% |4 | 2.40% |24926 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.40% |3 | 2.02% |20970 | vinay...@gmail.com 1.60% |2 | 2.16% |22459 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.60% |2 | 2.07% |21464 | jgu...@csc.com 1.60% |2 | 1.77% |18417 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.60% |2 | 1.49% |15442 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.60% |2 | 1.48% |15334 | john-i...@jck.com 1.60% |2 | 1.36% |14092 | framefri...@gmail.com 1.60% |2 | 1.35% |13994 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 1.60% |2 | 1.32% |13756 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 1.60% |2 | 1.32% |13737 | a...@yumaworks.com 1.60% |2 | 1.28% |13320 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.60% |2 | 1.18% |12275 | jo...@taugh.com 1.60% |2 | 1.17% |12171 | j...@jlc.net 1.60% |2 | 1.12% |11671 | w...@mti-systems.com 1.60% |2 | 0.97% |10051 | sust...@250bpm.com 0.80% |1 | 1.36% |14152 | stephen.na...@ericsson.com 0.80% |1 | 1.15% |11950 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.80% |1 | 1.10% |11434 | tb...@textuality.com 0.80% |1 | 0.99% |10320 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.80% |1 | 0.86% | 8963 | barryle...@computer.org 0.80% |1 | 0.84% | 8692 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.80% |1 | 0.80% | 8285 | hartmans-ie...@mit.edu 0.80% |1 | 0.78% | 8141 | d...@cridland.net 0.80% |1 | 0.76% | 7889 | superu...@gmail.com 0.80% |1 | 0.73% | 7623 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.80% |1 | 0.73% | 7609 | hil...@cursive.net 0.80% |1 | 0.71% | 7373 | m...@mnot.net 0.80% |1 | 0.70% | 7301 | martin.thom...@gmail.com 0.80% |1 | 0.70% | 7228 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.80% |1 | 0.70% | 7223 | mo...@network-heretics.com 0.80% |1 | 0.68% | 7094 | l...@cisco.com 0.80% |1 | 0.68% | 7084 | tnad...@lucidvision.com 0.80% |1 | 0.66% | 6860 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.80% |1 | 0.64% | 6680 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.80% |1 | 0.63% | 6528 | sc...@kitterman.com 0.80% |1 | 0.62% | 6404 | d...@dotat.at 0.80% |1 | 0.61% | 6287 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.80% |1 | 0.60% | 6262 | j...@jck.com 0.80% |1 | 0.58% | 6073 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.80% |1 | 0.58% | 5999 | masin...@adobe.com 0.80% |1 | 0.55% | 5702 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.80% |1 | 0.53% | 5552 | i...@ietf.org 0.80% |1 | 0.53% | 5530 | pe...@akayla.com 0.80% |1 | 0.52% | 5401 | to...@isi.edu 0.80% |1 | 0.48% | 4980 | k...@bbn.com 0.80% |1 | 0.45% | 4704 | ra...@psg.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 125 |100.00% | 1038779 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 288 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 9 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.29% | 21 | 6.58% | 137704 | ted.le...@nominum.com 4.86% | 14 | 4.24% |88736 | scott.b...@gmail.com 4.51% | 13 | 3.79% |79279 | jo...@taugh.com 3.82% | 11 | 4.27% |89389 | hadriel.kap...@oracle.com 2.78% |8 | 4.66% |97597 | hal...@gmail.com 3.47% | 10 | 3.18% |66490 | mo...@network-heretics.com 3.12% |9 | 3.19% |66877 | john-i...@jck.com 2.43% |7 | 2.11% |44224 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.43% |7 | 1.97% |41295 | aaron.d...@cl.cam.ac.uk 2.08% |6 | 2.03% |42597 | jab...@hopcount.ca 1.74% |5 | 2.24% |46840 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.74% |5 | 2.17% |45393 | cgriffi...@gmail.com 1.74% |5 | 1.72% |36025 | s...@resistor.net 1.74% |5 | 1.55% |32513 | c...@tzi.org 1.74% |5 | 1.55% |32472 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.74% |5 | 1.54% |32264 | barryle...@computer.org 1.74% |5 | 1.42% |29701 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.39% |4 | 1.72% |35986 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.74% |5 | 1.34% |28087 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.04% |3 | 1.62% |33914 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 1.39% |4 | 1.26% |26452 | ulr...@herberg.name 1.39% |4 | 1.21% |25379 | h...@cs.columbia.edu 1.04% |3 | 1.41% |29477 | g...@algebras.org 1.04% |3 | 1.25% |26200 | mary.h.bar...@gmail.com 0.69% |2 | 1.49% |31154 | superu...@gmail.com 1.04% |3 | 1.13% |23755 | hil...@cursive.net 0.69% |2 | 1.37% |28593 | cntre...@gmail.com 1.04% |3 | 1.00% |20881 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.04% |3 | 0.98% |20456 | pait...@cisco.com 1.04% |3 | 0.94% |19716 | o...@cisco.com 1.04% |3 | 0.92% |19193 | m...@sandelman.ca 1.04% |3 | 0.89% |18567 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.04% |3 | 0.87% |18120 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.04% |3 | 0.86% |18025 | l...@netapp.com 1.04% |3 | 0.86% |18017 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.04% |3 | 0.85% |17892 | joe...@bogus.com 0.69% |2 | 0.84% |17550 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.69% |2 | 0.82% |17211 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.69% |2 | 0.81% |16966 | huit...@microsoft.com 0.69% |2 | 0.77% |16166 | andr...@plixer.com 0.69% |2 | 0.74% |15583 | grm...@gmail.com 0.69% |2 | 0.73% |15295 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.69% |2 | 0.71% |14909 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.69% |2 | 0.71% |14817 | o...@nlnetlabs.nl 0.69% |2 | 0.69% |14423 | petit...@acm.org 0.69% |2 | 0.69% |14359 | james.h.man...@team.telstra.com 0.69% |2 | 0.64% |13368 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.69% |2 | 0.63% |13122 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.69% |2 | 0.58% |12238 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.69% |2 | 0.58% |12064 | h...@shrubbery.net 0.69% |2 | 0.56% |11702 | glenn.d...@nbcuni.com 0.69% |2 | 0.55% |11585 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 0.69% |2 | 0.54% |11318 | o...@edvina.net 0.69% |2 | 0.49% |10285 | m...@sap.com 0.35% |1 | 0.82% |17173 | cpign...@cisco.com 0.69% |2 | 0.47% | 9886 | ra...@psg.com 0.69% |2 | 0.43% | 8965 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.35% |1 | 0.60% |12460 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.49% |10339 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.35% |1 | 0.48% | 9952 | jmp...@cisco.com 0.35% |1 | 0.45% | 9462 | uyesh...@ifa.hawaii.edu 0.35% |1 | 0.45% | 9364 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 0.35% |1 | 0.45% | 9336 | rog...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.45% | 9333 | l...@cisco.com 0.35% |1 | 0.45% | 9330 | gjs...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.44% | 9299 | d...@cridland.net 0.35% |1 | 0.42% | 8862 | cgriffi...@dyn.com 0.35% |1 | 0.41% | 8603 | ma...@isc.org 0.35% |1 | 0.41% | 8490 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.40% | 8304 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.35% |1 | 0.37% | 7831 | b...@brianrosen.net 0.35% |1 | 0.37% | 7734 | aal...@blackberry.com 0.35% |1 | 0.36% | 7615 | jgu...@csc.com 0.35% |1 | 0.36% | 7582 | tobias.gond...@gondrom.org 0.35% |1 | 0.36% | 7517 | y...@isoc.org 0.35% |1 | 0.35% | 7345 | chell...@pobox.com 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7092 | l...@pi.nu 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7090 | listse...@me.com 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7056 | jcur...@istaff.org 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7056 | iana-questi...@iana.org 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7035 | t...@att.com 0.35% |1 | 0.33% | 7011 | rg+i...@qualcomm.com 0.35% |1 | 0.32% | 6788 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 0.35% |1 | 0.31% | 6483 | sprom...@unina.it 0.35% |1 |
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 222 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 2 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.95% | 11 | 7.45% | 129461 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 5.41% | 12 | 6.26% | 108812 | mo...@network-heretics.com 4.95% | 11 | 4.51% |78362 | s...@resistor.net 4.50% | 10 | 4.72% |82029 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.60% |8 | 5.15% |89569 | hal...@gmail.com 4.05% |9 | 3.58% |62145 | john-i...@jck.com 4.05% |9 | 3.54% |61529 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 4.05% |9 | 3.39% |58959 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.60% |8 | 2.83% |49207 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.80% |4 | 3.79% |65923 | leaf.yeh@gmail.com 3.15% |7 | 2.10% |36449 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 2.70% |6 | 2.50% |43444 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.70% |6 | 2.05% |35661 | stpe...@stpeter.im 2.25% |5 | 2.01% |34917 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.25% |5 | 1.87% |32418 | barryle...@computer.org 1.80% |4 | 2.25% |39049 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 1.35% |3 | 2.36% |41081 | sprom...@unina.it 1.80% |4 | 1.87% |32564 | a...@yumaworks.com 1.80% |4 | 1.65% |28732 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.80% |4 | 1.50% |26028 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.80% |4 | 1.45% |25184 | aaron.d...@cl.cam.ac.uk 1.35% |3 | 1.38% |24049 | ch...@ietf.org 1.35% |3 | 1.34% |23348 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 1.35% |3 | 1.16% |20126 | roland.bl...@kit.edu 1.35% |3 | 1.15% |19939 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 1.35% |3 | 1.12% |19406 | joe...@bogus.com 1.35% |3 | 1.09% |19009 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.35% |3 | 0.96% |16709 | to...@isi.edu 0.90% |2 | 0.99% |17194 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.90% |2 | 0.93% |16233 | petit...@acm.org 0.90% |2 | 0.85% |14812 | amor...@amsl.com 0.90% |2 | 0.82% |14280 | jcur...@istaff.org 0.90% |2 | 0.80% |13957 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 0.90% |2 | 0.77% |13418 | da...@tcb.net 0.90% |2 | 0.71% |12262 | josh.howl...@ja.net 0.90% |2 | 0.66% |11396 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.90% |2 | 0.64% |11075 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 0.90% |2 | 0.59% |10336 | ra...@psg.com 0.90% |2 | 0.56% | 9647 | i...@meetecho.com 0.45% |1 | 0.93% |16123 | nkuk...@verilan.com 0.45% |1 | 0.85% |14714 | jsalo...@cisco.com 0.45% |1 | 0.81% |14144 | andrewm...@google.com 0.45% |1 | 0.66% |11498 | amanda.ba...@icann.org 0.45% |1 | 0.62% |10744 | mary.h.bar...@gmail.com 0.45% |1 | 0.59% |10318 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.45% |1 | 0.55% | 9616 | d...@cridland.net 0.45% |1 | 0.54% | 9392 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.45% |1 | 0.50% | 8729 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.45% |1 | 0.50% | 8686 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.45% |1 | 0.47% | 8238 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.45% |1 | 0.46% | 7965 | br...@innovationslab.net 0.45% |1 | 0.46% | 7918 | kvi...@broadcom.com 0.45% |1 | 0.45% | 7905 | simon.lei...@switch.ch 0.45% |1 | 0.45% | 7825 | flu...@cisco.com 0.45% |1 | 0.45% | 7808 | m...@ripe.net 0.45% |1 | 0.43% | 7535 | bcla...@cisco.com 0.45% |1 | 0.43% | 7507 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.45% |1 | 0.43% | 7493 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.45% |1 | 0.42% | 7376 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 0.45% |1 | 0.42% | 7233 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.45% |1 | 0.40% | 7035 | gsalg...@cisco.com 0.45% |1 | 0.40% | 7005 | z...@sensinode.com 0.45% |1 | 0.39% | 6692 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.45% |1 | 0.37% | 6450 | ma...@isc.org 0.45% |1 | 0.37% | 6370 | jo...@taugh.com 0.45% |1 | 0.36% | 6308 | pe...@akayla.com 0.45% |1 | 0.34% | 5940 | lore...@meetecho.com 0.45% |1 | 0.34% | 5865 | ietf2d...@davearonson.com 0.45% |1 | 0.34% | 5864 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.45% |1 | 0.33% | 5797 | st...@shinkuro.com 0.45% |1 | 0.33% | 5733 | tterr...@xiph.org 0.45% |1 | 0.32% | 5593 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.45% |1 | 0.30% | 5262 | bra...@isi.edu 0.45% |1 | 0.30% | 5180 | jh...@cmu.edu 0.45% |1 | 0.29% | 5035 | adr...@olddog.co.uk +--++--+ 100.00% | 222 |100.00% | 1737615 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 109 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 26 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 13.76% | 15 | 21.67% | 210921 | aal...@blackberry.com 9.17% | 10 | 12.47% | 121366 | tb...@textuality.com 8.26% |9 | 5.89% |57325 | john-i...@jck.com 5.50% |6 | 4.62% |44943 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 5.50% |6 | 3.65% |35534 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 4.59% |5 | 3.33% |32388 | scott.b...@gmail.com 3.67% |4 | 2.80% |27207 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.67% |4 | 2.55% |24814 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.75% |3 | 2.30% |22369 | s...@resistor.net 2.75% |3 | 1.93% |18799 | martin.thom...@gmail.com 1.83% |2 | 2.54% |24758 | christer.holmb...@ericsson.com 0.92% |1 | 3.11% |30309 | kewi...@gmail.com 1.83% |2 | 1.92% |18643 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.83% |2 | 1.89% |18402 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 1.83% |2 | 1.53% |14864 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.83% |2 | 1.48% |14368 | barryle...@computer.org 1.83% |2 | 1.34% |13036 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.83% |2 | 1.09% |10638 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.83% |2 | 1.08% |10477 | ra...@psg.com 0.92% |1 | 1.35% |13094 | stefan.win...@restena.lu 0.92% |1 | 1.24% |12041 | f...@cisco.com 0.92% |1 | 1.20% |11680 | b...@nostrum.com 0.92% |1 | 1.11% |10772 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.92% |1 | 1.01% | 9859 | jgu...@csc.com 0.92% |1 | 1.01% | 9791 | flu...@cisco.com 0.92% |1 | 1.01% | 9790 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.92% |1 | 0.99% | 9631 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.92% |1 | 0.97% | 9427 | ch...@ietf.org 0.92% |1 | 0.94% | 9194 | jsalo...@cisco.com 0.92% |1 | 0.92% | 8995 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.92% |1 | 0.86% | 8343 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.92% |1 | 0.82% | 7966 | eric.g...@ericsson.com 0.92% |1 | 0.82% | 7933 | josh.howl...@ja.net 0.92% |1 | 0.80% | 7752 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.92% |1 | 0.79% | 7722 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 0.92% |1 | 0.78% | 7598 | br...@innovationslab.net 0.92% |1 | 0.72% | 7008 | ted.le...@nominum.com 0.92% |1 | 0.68% | 6631 | zehn@gmail.com 0.92% |1 | 0.68% | 6610 | joe...@bogus.com 0.92% |1 | 0.64% | 6216 | d...@1-4-5.net 0.92% |1 | 0.62% | 6060 | garbak...@gmail.com 0.92% |1 | 0.59% | 5790 | simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca 0.92% |1 | 0.59% | 5731 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.92% |1 | 0.58% | 5663 | tterr...@xiph.org 0.92% |1 | 0.58% | 5617 | f...@isoc.org 0.92% |1 | 0.52% | 5085 | j...@jck.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 109 |100.00% | 973160 | Total
Google on dotless domains [was Re: IAB Statement on Dotless Domains]
Google is pushing for dotless-dot-search, so you can guarantee it will work in chromium (with or without ICANN's blessing). Here is what a Google employee actually said about Google and dotless domains at last week's ICANN public forum in Durban: JORDYN BUCHANAN: HELLO. I'M JORDYN BUCHANAN WITH GOOGLE. I'D LIKE TO MAKE SOME OF THE SSR CONVERSATIONS WE'VE HAD TODAY A LITTLE MORE CONCRETE AT LEAST WITH A COUPLE EXAMPLES THAT WE'RE HAPPY TO DISCUSS AS AN APPLICANT FOR NEW gTLDs. FIRST, I'D LIKE TO VERY BRIEFLY ADDRESS DOTLESS TLDS. AS PEOPLE MAY KNOW, WE HAVE SUBMITTED A APPLICATION AMENDMENT FOR OUR DOT SEARCH TLD THAT DOES INCLUDE A REGISTRY SERVICE THAT INCLUDES DOTLESS AND A DOTLESS ELEMENT. WE FULLY EXPECT -- AND I UNDERSTAND THAT THE GUIDEBOOK PROVIDES THAT IF AN APPLICANT PROPOSES TO OPERATE A DOTLESS SERVICE, THAT THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL SCRUTINY AND THAT ICANN WILL REVIEW THAT PROCESS AND MAKE SURE THAT ANY SECURITY CONCERNS ARE MITIGATED. WE APPRECIATE THAT THERE ARE POTENTIAL SSR CONCERNS AND WE ARE DELIGHTED THAT ICANN WILL FULLY REVIEW THAT BEFORE DECIDING WHETHER OR NOT TO ALLOW THAT SERVICE TO BE OPERATED. WE DO NOT INTEND TO BYPASS THE PROCESS OR OTHERWISE HAVE OUR AMENDMENT APPROVED PRIOR TO THE FULL EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSED SERVICE. SECOND, I'D LIKE TO POINT OUT WE ARE -- WE'RE THE APPLICANT FOR DOT ADS. IT HAS A LOW PRIORITY NUMBER, 392. IT'S UNCONTENDED. THERE ARE NO OBJECTIONS. I EXPECT THAT UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES, WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO START TO OPERATE IT IN THE RELATIVELY NEAR FUTURE, BUT IT'S NOT QUITE NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES. BECAUSE IT ALSO APPEARS ON THE TOP HANDFUL OF POTENTIAL NAME COLLISIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE INTERAISLE REPORT OR AT LEAST THE PREVIEW OF IT THAT WE'VE SEEN. TO THAT EXTENT I'M HERE TO COMMIT TODAY WE'RE NOT GOING TO OPERATE DOT ADS PRIOR TO A FULL EVALUATION OF ANY POTENTIAL SECURITY INTERACTIONSMENT WE'D LOVE TO TALK TO AMY AND OTHERS IN THE COMMUNITY THAT MAY HAVE ISSUES AND WE'LL START TO WORK ON MITIGATION NOW. WE HAVE A CONCRETE EXAMPLE, LET'S START TO WORK ON THE PROCESS AND MAKE SURE THAT BY THE TIME WE GET TO THE POINT THAT WE'RE READY TO START TO WORK THROUGH SOME OF THE OTHER TLDS THAT OTHER PEOPLE OPERATE OR ARE CON TENTDED WE WORK THROUGH THIS ISSUE. WE WON'T DELEGATE IT UNTIL IT'S SOLVED. [ APPLAUSE. ] CHERINE CHALABY: THANK YOU, JORDYN. ANYONE WISH TO COMMENT ON JORDYN'S -- FADI. FADI CHEHADE: YEAH, JORDYN, JUST TO SAY THANK YOU FOR THE RESPONSIBLE APPROACH YOU'RE TAKING AND GOOGLE IS TAKING HERE. IT'S APPRECIATED. AND I THINK EVEN AMY AND OTHERS WOULD APPRECIATE THE WAY WE ARE DEALING WITH THESE POTENTIAL ISSUES. SO REALLY, THAT'S THE WAY I HOPE ALL OF US WILL COOPERATE TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES AS A COMMUNITY. THANK YOU FOR THAT. CHERINE CHALABY: THANK YOU, FADI. NEXT SPEAKER, PLEASE.
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 140 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 19 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.71% |8 | 8.08% |97324 | hal...@gmail.com 6.43% |9 | 6.96% |83850 | denghu...@gmail.com 4.29% |6 | 4.53% |54622 | stefan.win...@restena.lu 3.57% |5 | 4.57% |55051 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.57% |5 | 4.25% |51253 | bernard_ab...@hotmail.com 2.86% |4 | 4.62% |55730 | mary.h.bar...@gmail.com 3.57% |5 | 3.02% |36363 | john-i...@jck.com 3.57% |5 | 2.92% |35224 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.14% |3 | 4.28% |51567 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.86% |4 | 2.49% |29961 | p...@nohats.ca 2.86% |4 | 2.42% |29197 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.86% |4 | 2.41% |29071 | jo...@taugh.com 2.86% |4 | 2.39% |28792 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 2.86% |4 | 2.30% |27727 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 2.86% |4 | 1.98% |23903 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.14% |3 | 1.90% |22957 | do...@dougbarton.us 2.14% |3 | 1.54% |18617 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.43% |2 | 1.93% |23242 | ya...@cnnic.cn 2.14% |3 | 1.20% |14449 | ra...@psg.com 1.43% |2 | 1.76% |21270 | sanjay.mis...@verizon.com 1.43% |2 | 1.63% |19615 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.43% |2 | 1.54% |18571 | mo...@network-heretics.com 1.43% |2 | 1.32% |15922 | jason_living...@cable.comcast.com 1.43% |2 | 1.29% |15570 | b...@nostrum.com 1.43% |2 | 1.29% |15566 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 1.43% |2 | 1.12% |13496 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.43% |2 | 1.04% |12564 | c...@a.org 1.43% |2 | 0.90% |10822 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.43% |2 | 0.84% |10168 | ietf-secretar...@ietf.org 0.71% |1 | 1.17% |14159 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 1.09% |13117 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.71% |1 | 1.08% |13018 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 1.00% |12082 | s...@resistor.net 0.71% |1 | 0.99% |11935 | afab...@hotmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.86% |10393 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.71% |1 | 0.84% |10151 | joseph@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.77% | 9267 | bdick...@verisign.com 0.71% |1 | 0.76% | 9199 | ma...@isc.org 0.71% |1 | 0.74% | 8911 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.71% |1 | 0.72% | 8624 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.71% |1 | 0.67% | 8033 | p...@frobbit.se 0.71% |1 | 0.66% | 7910 | margaret...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.65% | 7858 | me...@globetel.com.ph 0.71% |1 | 0.65% | 7792 | pait...@cisco.com 0.71% |1 | 0.63% | 7594 | ebur...@standardstrack.com 0.71% |1 | 0.62% | 7504 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.62% | 7428 | ptha...@broadcom.com 0.71% |1 | 0.61% | 7345 | t...@dropfuse.com 0.71% |1 | 0.59% | 7124 | s...@harvard.edu 0.71% |1 | 0.59% | 7109 | war...@kumari.net 0.71% |1 | 0.58% | 6934 | zehn@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.57% | 6874 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 0.71% |1 | 0.55% | 6656 | ferna...@gont.com.ar 0.71% |1 | 0.55% | 6603 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.71% |1 | 0.54% | 6560 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.54% | 6450 | o...@gih.com 0.71% |1 | 0.52% | 6322 | due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp 0.71% |1 | 0.50% | 6028 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.71% |1 | 0.49% | 5936 | fa...@isi.edu 0.71% |1 | 0.48% | 5815 | ch...@ietf.org 0.71% |1 | 0.46% | 5598 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.46% | 5568 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 0.71% |1 | 0.46% | 5491 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 0.71% |1 | 0.44% | 5301 | a...@hxr.us +--++--+ 100.00% | 140 |100.00% | 1205153 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 135 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 12 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.19% |7 | 5.14% |54819 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 5.19% |7 | 4.23% |45126 | john-i...@jck.com 4.44% |6 | 3.52% |37475 | mo...@network-heretics.com 2.96% |4 | 3.70% |39453 | denghu...@gmail.com 3.70% |5 | 2.87% |30590 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.96% |4 | 2.96% |31531 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 4.84% |51543 | communicat...@edox.com 2.96% |4 | 2.61% |27819 | d3e...@gmail.com 2.96% |4 | 2.48% |26411 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 2.96% |4 | 2.46% |26176 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.96% |4 | 2.33% |24811 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 2.22% |3 | 2.50% |26695 | pe...@akayla.com 1.48% |2 | 2.96% |31597 | sprom...@unina.it 2.22% |3 | 2.09% |22285 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 2.22% |3 | 1.83% |19504 | zehn@gmail.com 2.22% |3 | 1.82% |19399 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.48% |2 | 2.53% |26980 | step...@sprunk.org 1.48% |2 | 2.27% |24163 | liushuch...@huawei.com 2.22% |3 | 1.45% |15415 | simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca 2.22% |3 | 1.36% |14508 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.48% |2 | 1.33% |14213 | b...@nostrum.com 0.74% |1 | 1.96% |20916 | allison.man...@gmail.com 1.48% |2 | 1.19% |12664 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.48% |2 | 1.16% |12389 | s...@harvard.edu 1.48% |2 | 1.16% |12317 | cy...@daboo.name 1.48% |2 | 1.13% |12080 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 1.87% |19971 | ch...@ietf.org 1.48% |2 | 1.10% |11729 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.74% |1 | 1.66% |17648 | victor.zhong...@huawei.com 0.74% |1 | 1.07% |11398 | joseph@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.96% |10235 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.74% |1 | 0.95% |10138 | superu...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.94% |10061 | ida_le...@yahoo.com 0.74% |1 | 0.94% | 9998 | skar...@science.alquds.edu 0.74% |1 | 0.89% | 9524 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.74% |1 | 0.88% | 9327 | mkaus...@us.ibm.com 0.74% |1 | 0.86% | 9132 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.83% | 8839 | hal...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.82% | 8735 | s...@resistor.net 0.74% |1 | 0.81% | 8615 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 0.74% |1 | 0.78% | 8319 | aal...@blackberry.com 0.74% |1 | 0.74% | 7885 | mthor...@adobe.com 0.74% |1 | 0.74% | 7836 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.72% | 7684 | dmb...@us.ibm.com 0.74% |1 | 0.71% | 7603 | loja...@cisco.com 0.74% |1 | 0.71% | 7520 | akat...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.70% | 7501 | ptha...@broadcom.com 0.74% |1 | 0.70% | 7416 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.74% |1 | 0.69% | 7384 | t...@dropfuse.com 0.74% |1 | 0.69% | 7331 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.74% |1 | 0.69% | 7319 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 0.74% |1 | 0.68% | 7280 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 0.74% |1 | 0.66% | 7053 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.74% |1 | 0.66% | 7052 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.74% |1 | 0.64% | 6803 | swm...@swm.pp.se 0.74% |1 | 0.64% | 6775 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.63% | 6767 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.74% |1 | 0.63% | 6716 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.74% |1 | 0.61% | 6507 | amor...@amsl.com 0.74% |1 | 0.59% | 6332 | o...@cisco.com 0.74% |1 | 0.58% | 6225 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.74% |1 | 0.58% | 6171 | josh.howl...@ja.net 0.74% |1 | 0.58% | 6161 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.56% | 5970 | joe...@bogus.com 0.74% |1 | 0.55% | 5855 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.74% |1 | 0.55% | 5810 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.54% | 5764 | j...@jck.com 0.74% |1 | 0.54% | 5751 | ra...@psg.com 0.74% |1 | 0.53% | 5640 | pait...@cisco.com 0.74% |1 | 0.53% | 5605 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.74% |1 | 0.52% | 5513 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.74% |1 | 0.50% | 5332 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.74% |1 | 0.48% | 5096 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.74% |1 | 0.45% | 4798 | p...@frobbit.se 0.74% |1 | 0.45% | 4752 | age...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 135 |100.00% | 1065755 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 92 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 5 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.35% |4 | 4.01% |25872 | john-i...@jck.com 4.35% |4 | 3.77% |24329 | m...@sap.com 4.35% |4 | 3.72% |24024 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.26% |3 | 4.36% |28144 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 3.26% |3 | 3.76% |24231 | d3e...@gmail.com 3.26% |3 | 3.44% |22163 | war...@kumari.net 3.26% |3 | 3.00% |19334 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 3.26% |3 | 2.80% |18070 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.26% |3 | 2.65% |17087 | jo...@taugh.com 2.17% |2 | 3.20% |20669 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 3.26% |3 | 2.03% |13113 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 2.17% |2 | 2.41% |15515 | michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de 2.17% |2 | 2.29% |14782 | nomcom-chair-2...@ietf.org 2.17% |2 | 2.19% |14143 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 2.17% |2 | 2.06% |13293 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.17% |2 | 2.02% |13006 | mstjo...@comcast.net 2.17% |2 | 1.95% |12611 | scott.b...@gmail.com 2.17% |2 | 1.83% |11808 | descom...@lpsc.in2p3.fr 2.17% |2 | 1.78% |11464 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 2.17% |2 | 1.71% |11056 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.09% |1 | 2.35% |15138 | hal...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 2.31% |14906 | rex_corpuz2...@yahoo.com 1.09% |1 | 2.04% |13179 | ron.even@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.72% |11083 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.62% |10449 | rbon...@juniper.net 1.09% |1 | 1.55% |10013 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.09% |1 | 1.37% | 8834 | michael_oreir...@cable.comcast.com 1.09% |1 | 1.35% | 8735 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.26% | 8150 | t...@att.com 1.09% |1 | 1.23% | 7921 | framefri...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.21% | 7781 | s...@resistor.net 1.09% |1 | 1.20% | 7761 | eck...@cisco.com 1.09% |1 | 1.20% | 7713 | r...@ipv.sx 1.09% |1 | 1.18% | 7620 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.09% |1 | 1.17% | 7562 | jab...@hopcount.ca 1.09% |1 | 1.17% | 7518 | j...@wide.ad.jp 1.09% |1 | 1.15% | 7407 | mike5...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.12% | 7225 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.09% |1 | 1.12% | 7196 | iab-ch...@iab.org 1.09% |1 | 1.08% | 6983 | tramm...@tik.ee.ethz.ch 1.09% |1 | 1.03% | 6626 | d...@cridland.net 1.09% |1 | 0.98% | 6352 | johannes.mer...@secunet.com 1.09% |1 | 0.96% | 6174 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 0.95% | 6108 | l...@cisco.com 1.09% |1 | 0.93% | 6027 | william.mcc...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 0.93% | 6010 | due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp 1.09% |1 | 0.91% | 5900 | sandra.mur...@sparta.com 1.09% |1 | 0.90% | 5811 | ch...@ietf.org 1.09% |1 | 0.90% | 5809 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.09% |1 | 0.90% | 5799 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.09% |1 | 0.88% | 5679 | l...@netapp.com 1.09% |1 | 0.88% | 5660 | d...@dotat.at 1.09% |1 | 0.87% | 5627 | barryle...@computer.org 1.09% |1 | 0.86% | 5548 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.09% |1 | 0.78% | 5034 | d...@xpasc.com 1.09% |1 | 0.78% | 5014 | bra...@isi.edu 1.09% |1 | 0.75% | 4814 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 1.09% |1 | 0.73% | 4727 | ra...@psg.com 1.09% |1 | 0.70% | 4502 | i...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 92 |100.00% | 645109 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 177 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 28 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.65% | 10 | 8.11% | 110934 | hal...@gmail.com 5.65% | 10 | 5.57% |76202 | john-i...@jck.com 4.52% |8 | 5.47% |74837 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 4.52% |8 | 4.48% |61298 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.82% |5 | 4.83% |66157 | mthor...@adobe.com 3.95% |7 | 3.37% |46083 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 3.95% |7 | 3.06% |41900 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.39% |6 | 2.96% |40545 | scott.b...@gmail.com 3.39% |6 | 2.94% |40172 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 2.82% |5 | 3.22% |44133 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.26% |4 | 3.15% |43058 | d...@cridland.net 2.82% |5 | 2.50% |34215 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.82% |5 | 2.07% |28370 | l...@netapp.com 2.26% |4 | 2.16% |29572 | jcur...@istaff.org 2.26% |4 | 1.91% |26171 | s...@resistor.net 1.69% |3 | 2.15% |29469 | akat...@gmail.com 1.69% |3 | 1.85% |25314 | jab...@hopcount.ca 1.13% |2 | 2.38% |32597 | b...@nostrum.com 1.69% |3 | 1.76% |24108 | l...@cisco.com 1.69% |3 | 1.67% |22799 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.69% |3 | 1.47% |20134 | mstjo...@comcast.net 1.69% |3 | 1.47% |20119 | d...@1-4-5.net 1.69% |3 | 1.26% |17180 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.69% |3 | 1.07% |14713 | ra...@psg.com 1.13% |2 | 1.36% |18554 | daedu...@btconnect.com 1.13% |2 | 1.22% |16695 | barryle...@computer.org 1.13% |2 | 1.19% |16317 | dhark...@lounge.org 1.13% |2 | 1.00% |13656 | f...@cisco.com 1.13% |2 | 0.99% |13588 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 1.13% |2 | 0.98% |13415 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.13% |2 | 0.95% |13022 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.13% |2 | 0.95% |12989 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.13% |2 | 0.94% |12845 | iab-ch...@iab.org 1.13% |2 | 0.90% |12257 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.13% |2 | 0.81% |11043 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.13% |2 | 0.78% |10724 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.13% |2 | 0.64% | 8778 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.56% |1 | 0.96% |13129 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.56% |1 | 0.77% |10514 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.56% |1 | 0.73% | 9993 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.56% |1 | 0.71% | 9769 | jdr...@juniper.net 0.56% |1 | 0.63% | 8650 | rich...@shockey.us 0.56% |1 | 0.61% | 8295 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.56% |1 | 0.60% | 8144 | s...@harvard.edu 0.56% |1 | 0.59% | 8111 | far...@umn.edu 0.56% |1 | 0.58% | 7976 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 0.56% |1 | 0.58% | 7902 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 0.56% |1 | 0.57% | 7844 | faizz...@yahoo.com 0.56% |1 | 0.54% | 7453 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.56% |1 | 0.53% | 7290 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.56% |1 | 0.52% | 7155 | t...@att.com 0.56% |1 | 0.52% | 7120 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.56% |1 | 0.50% | 6843 | va...@comnet.tkk.fi 0.56% |1 | 0.49% | 6770 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.56% |1 | 0.48% | 6621 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.56% |1 | 0.48% | 6621 | d...@xpasc.com 0.56% |1 | 0.47% | 6391 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.56% |1 | 0.47% | 6368 | m...@sandelman.ca 0.56% |1 | 0.45% | 6142 | o...@ogud.com 0.56% |1 | 0.44% | 6072 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.56% |1 | 0.44% | 6067 | i...@ietf.org 0.56% |1 | 0.43% | 5848 | jmamo...@gmail.com 0.56% |1 | 0.42% | 5781 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.56% |1 | 0.41% | 5638 | l...@pi.nu 0.56% |1 | 0.40% | 5449 | d...@ewellic.org 0.56% |1 | 0.39% | 5293 | flu...@iii.ca 0.56% |1 | 0.37% | 5025 | m...@sap.com 0.56% |1 | 0.33% | 4458 | age...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 177 |100.00% | 1368695 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 164 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 21 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.93% | 13 | 6.46% |83622 | stpe...@stpeter.im 6.10% | 10 | 5.81% |75305 | do...@dougbarton.us 4.88% |8 | 3.91% |50591 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 4.27% |7 | 4.48% |58056 | john-i...@jck.com 3.05% |5 | 4.91% |63546 | david.bl...@emc.com 3.05% |5 | 3.70% |47900 | hal...@gmail.com 3.05% |5 | 3.37% |43652 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 3.66% |6 | 2.68% |34743 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.44% |4 | 3.47% |44982 | jsalo...@cisco.com 2.44% |4 | 2.11% |27359 | s...@resistor.net 2.44% |4 | 2.03% |26268 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.44% |4 | 2.01% |26016 | joe...@bogus.com 2.44% |4 | 1.95% |25313 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.83% |3 | 2.27% |29410 | morrowc.li...@gmail.com 1.83% |3 | 2.01% |25980 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.83% |3 | 1.83% |23694 | p...@frobbit.se 1.83% |3 | 1.79% |23217 | b...@nostrum.com 1.83% |3 | 1.56% |20167 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.83% |3 | 1.49% |19314 | war...@kumari.net 1.22% |2 | 2.05% |26509 | ed.le...@neustar.biz 1.83% |3 | 1.42% |18361 | hartm...@painless-security.com 1.83% |3 | 1.24% |16039 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 1.83% |3 | 1.23% |15972 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 0.61% |1 | 2.41% |31232 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 1.83% |3 | 1.14% |14763 | ra...@psg.com 1.22% |2 | 1.68% |21721 | suresh.krish...@ericsson.com 0.61% |1 | 2.27% |29379 | magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com 1.22% |2 | 1.42% |18391 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 1.22% |2 | 1.40% |18104 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.22% |2 | 1.36% |17556 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.22% |2 | 1.35% |17460 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 1.22% |2 | 1.27% |16497 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 1.22% |2 | 1.19% |15475 | f...@cisco.com 1.22% |2 | 1.02% |13166 | br...@innovationslab.net 1.22% |2 | 0.86% |11137 | aser...@lacnic.net 1.22% |2 | 0.70% | 9102 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.61% |1 | 1.10% |14193 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.61% |1 | 0.85% |10959 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.61% |1 | 0.83% |10754 | d...@cridland.net 0.61% |1 | 0.81% |10541 | shollenb...@verisign.com 0.61% |1 | 0.78% |10037 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 0.61% |1 | 0.74% | 9635 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.61% |1 | 0.73% | 9392 | mirja.kuehlew...@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de 0.61% |1 | 0.68% | 8857 | f...@isoc.org 0.61% |1 | 0.66% | 8528 | me...@globetel.com.ph 0.61% |1 | 0.61% | 7937 | barryle...@computer.org 0.61% |1 | 0.59% | 7633 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.61% |1 | 0.59% | 7614 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.57% | 7422 | droma...@avaya.com 0.61% |1 | 0.57% | 7367 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.55% | 7182 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.61% |1 | 0.54% | 7035 | nomcom-chair-2...@ietf.org 0.61% |1 | 0.53% | 6804 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.61% |1 | 0.52% | 6786 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.61% |1 | 0.51% | 6609 | ma...@isc.org 0.61% |1 | 0.51% | 6549 | jo...@taugh.com 0.61% |1 | 0.50% | 6442 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.61% |1 | 0.48% | 6250 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 0.61% |1 | 0.47% | 6147 | m...@mnot.net 0.61% |1 | 0.46% | 5925 | turn...@ieca.com 0.61% |1 | 0.45% | 5781 | jo...@iecc.com 0.61% |1 | 0.44% | 5733 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.61% |1 | 0.44% | 5640 | o...@ogud.com 0.61% |1 | 0.43% | 5549 | c...@tzi.org 0.61% |1 | 0.41% | 5339 | d...@xpasc.com 0.61% |1 | 0.40% | 5241 | d...@virtualized.org 0.61% |1 | 0.40% | 5212 | i...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 164 |100.00% | 1295092 | Total
Re: Lessons from PROVREG WG was Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois...
Looking back in hindsight, what would help is to have some means for the IETF to provide a maintenance vehicle for it's products. I think there is some truth to this. The reality has at times been that some WGs get a bit out of control after they've been around a while, and getting them to deliver final product is a challenge. Rather then finish a MIB or do the boring OAM stuff that a real protocol needs, folk are much more interested in develeping all sorts of extensions and other features. As such, ADs often want to shut down the WG and make everyone go away. The challenge of creating maintenance WGs is that unless handled well, they become magnets for all the leftover and unfinshed (and often uneeded) work and random individual drafts from the original WG. And all the same players with all the same agendas are tempted to show up at the new WG. Maintenance WGs are definitely needed. And they need to be timed correctly. Wait too long, and you miss the window of opportunity during which folk are starting to implement/deploy, and you can still fix the spec. Successful maintenance WGs also need strong chairs and carefuly crafted charters that keep them from becoming nuisance magnets. The challenge in doing that I think keeps ADs from chartering such WGs in some cases when a WG really is needed. Even today, there are maintenance WGs that have issues. They can be identified by the ratio of mail/drafts/discussion to the actual importance of the problem purported to being solved. Thomas
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 158 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 14 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 10.13% | 16 | 9.82% | 124800 | ted.le...@nominum.com 5.06% |8 | 6.98% |88757 | d...@cridland.net 4.43% |7 | 4.80% |61022 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 3.80% |6 | 3.80% |48351 | s...@resistor.net 3.80% |6 | 3.54% |45049 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 3.16% |5 | 4.16% |52840 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.80% |6 | 3.04% |38633 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.16% |5 | 2.73% |34740 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.16% |5 | 2.56% |32572 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.16% |5 | 2.00% |25369 | ra...@psg.com 2.53% |4 | 2.37% |30074 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.90% |3 | 2.47% |31426 | magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com 2.53% |4 | 1.77% |22553 | d...@xpasc.com 1.90% |3 | 2.14% |27243 | a...@yumaworks.com 1.90% |3 | 1.70% |21617 | joe...@bogus.com 1.90% |3 | 1.61% |20461 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.27% |2 | 1.68% |21373 | elw...@folly.org.uk 1.27% |2 | 1.62% |20640 | droma...@avaya.com 1.27% |2 | 1.62% |20584 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.27% |2 | 1.50% |19051 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 1.27% |2 | 1.43% |18119 | d3e...@gmail.com 1.27% |2 | 1.34% |16981 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.27% |2 | 1.26% |15973 | s...@harvard.edu 1.27% |2 | 1.20% |15292 | turn...@ieca.com 0.63% |1 | 1.80% |22839 | jdr...@juniper.net 1.27% |2 | 1.15% |14594 | ulr...@herberg.name 1.27% |2 | 1.11% |14169 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.27% |2 | 1.11% |14096 | rpellet...@isoc.org 1.27% |2 | 1.10% |14014 | john-i...@jck.com 1.27% |2 | 1.09% |13798 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.27% |2 | 1.06% |13454 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.27% |2 | 1.00% |12670 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 0.63% |1 | 1.62% |20647 | yi.ji...@gmail.com 1.27% |2 | 0.99% |12579 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.27% |2 | 0.96% |12163 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.63% |1 | 1.27% |16099 | l...@netapp.com 0.63% |1 | 0.98% |12438 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.86% |10985 | barryle...@computer.org 0.63% |1 | 0.81% |10259 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.80% |10208 | co...@isoc.org 0.63% |1 | 0.79% |10055 | war...@kumari.net 0.63% |1 | 0.76% | 9637 | mthor...@adobe.com 0.63% |1 | 0.73% | 9336 | og...@earthlink.net 0.63% |1 | 0.67% | 8536 | r...@ipv.sx 0.63% |1 | 0.67% | 8463 | m...@mnot.net 0.63% |1 | 0.59% | 7508 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.63% |1 | 0.59% | 7458 | martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu 0.63% |1 | 0.58% | 7344 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.56% | 7178 | glenz...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.56% | 7122 | m...@blackops.org 0.63% |1 | 0.55% | 6963 | ma...@isc.org 0.63% |1 | 0.53% | 6792 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.63% |1 | 0.52% | 6659 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 0.63% |1 | 0.52% | 6606 | l...@cisco.com 0.63% |1 | 0.52% | 6584 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.63% |1 | 0.51% | 6541 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.51% | 6495 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.63% |1 | 0.50% | 6378 | jul...@braga.eti.br 0.63% |1 | 0.48% | 6084 | pe...@akayla.com 0.63% |1 | 0.48% | 6076 | jo...@taugh.com 0.63% |1 | 0.48% | 6055 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.63% |1 | 0.47% | 5965 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.63% |1 | 0.47% | 5916 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.63% |1 | 0.46% | 5880 | amor...@amsl.com 0.63% |1 | 0.46% | 5847 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 0.63% |1 | 0.43% | 5509 | c...@tzi.org 0.63% |1 | 0.42% | 5331 | swm...@swm.pp.se 0.63% |1 | 0.36% | 4587 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 158 |100.00% | 1271437 | Total
Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers
[only now reviewing this thread...] Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr writes: On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:26:39AM +1000, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote a message of 52 lines which said: I'm not sure what the solution should be but regular audits of delegated nameservers by infrastructure operator and removal of delegations after a grace period Let's not reinvent the wheel: I suggest to first study the experience of the TLD which did exactly that. .fr had mandatory technical tests of the name servers almost from its inception, until december 2012. The tool used for the tests was Zonecheck http://www.zonecheck.fr/ Although these tests certainly contributed to the good technical quality of the name servers, they were removed both for commercial reasons (a registry has to make money to pay its employees) and because it was easier to have the same rules for ccTLDs and gTLDs (and ICANN forbids these technical tests in gTLDs). First I've heard that ICANN forbids these technical tests in gTLDs, and I doubt it's true. Just exactly what tests are you referring to? It would also help if you could point to the actual policies or contract language in the registry or registrar contracts that speak to these restrictions you refer to. Thomas
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
What the weekly stats really ought to tally up is the readers/postings ratio, so that folk would get more direct feedback as to whether what they are posting is actually being read... My strong suspicion would be that there is strong negative correlation between frequency of posts and actual readers of those posts... Also, I suspect that many people do not realize that a significant chunk of IETF contributers are no longer subscribed to the ietf list due to signal to noise ratio concerns... Thomas
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
I've wondered for some time whether the reported bytes is the whole message I send included context quotes, or if there is an attempt by the summary logic to factor out quoted content. Original script is here: http://www.hactrn.net/hacks/mh-list-traffic/mh-list-traffic I don't think I've modified it other than to keep it running under my local setup. From my perspective, the intention/usefulness of the weekly posting is to give folk a high-level view of who is posting and how often. It is not uncommon to see certain individuals stand out. In some cases, that makes perfect sense -- and the signal level is high. In other cases, it shows (IMO) people who are too quick to post and who (too often) say predictable things if you've read previous threads on the same general topic. YMMV. Beyond that (e.g., tweaking the priorities of how rankings are done), I don't see much point. Different people will have different opinions on what to give priority to, and this is ultimately a judgement call. Thomas
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 146 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 7 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 10.27% | 15 | 9.96% | 125797 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.11% |6 | 6.44% |81389 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 5.48% |8 | 3.76% |47556 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 4.11% |6 | 4.30% |54259 | war...@kumari.net 3.42% |5 | 3.58% |45181 | john-i...@jck.com 3.42% |5 | 3.28% |41450 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 3.42% |5 | 3.16% |39894 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.42% |5 | 2.36% |29749 | ra...@psg.com 2.74% |4 | 2.53% |31911 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 2.74% |4 | 2.18% |27483 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 3.38% |42690 | ron.even@gmail.com 2.74% |4 | 1.86% |23539 | m...@mnot.net 1.37% |2 | 3.15% |39833 | simo.veikkolai...@nokia.com 2.05% |3 | 1.88% |23809 | scott.b...@gmail.com 2.05% |3 | 1.68% |21225 | s...@resistor.net 2.05% |3 | 1.62% |20488 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.37% |2 | 2.29% |28971 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 2.05% |3 | 1.54% |19411 | jmamo...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 2.80% |35397 | elw...@folly.org.uk 2.05% |3 | 1.37% |17285 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.68% |1 | 2.66% |33542 | cb.li...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 1.73% |21883 | barryle...@computer.org 1.37% |2 | 1.64% |20761 | jcur...@istaff.org 1.37% |2 | 1.50% |18953 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 1.44% |18207 | ulr...@herberg.name 1.37% |2 | 1.37% |17302 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.37% |2 | 1.35% |17078 | aeop...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 1.27% |16048 | m...@blackops.org 1.37% |2 | 1.10% |13834 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 1.09% |13711 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 1.37% |2 | 1.06% |13376 | joe...@bogus.com 1.37% |2 | 0.94% |11882 | c...@tzi.org 1.37% |2 | 0.92% |11641 | to...@isi.edu 0.68% |1 | 1.60% |20151 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 1.37% |2 | 0.88% |11081 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.37% |2 | 0.87% |10956 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.68% |1 | 0.95% |12013 | ke-oog...@kddi.com 0.68% |1 | 0.88% |11066 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.68% |1 | 0.73% | 9244 | og...@earthlink.net 0.68% |1 | 0.67% | 8504 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.66% | 8340 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.63% | 7996 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.68% |1 | 0.63% | 7948 | yb...@panix.com 0.68% |1 | 0.62% | 7882 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.68% |1 | 0.61% | 7654 | i...@cdl.asgaard.org 0.68% |1 | 0.61% | 7651 | yi.ji...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.60% | 7579 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.68% |1 | 0.59% | 7486 | ma...@isc.org 0.68% |1 | 0.55% | 6960 | d...@cridland.net 0.68% |1 | 0.55% | 6886 | aman...@verisign.com 0.68% |1 | 0.53% | 6748 | rwfra...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.52% | 6615 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.68% |1 | 0.52% | 6609 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.68% |1 | 0.51% | 6418 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.68% |1 | 0.50% | 6367 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.68% |1 | 0.50% | 6353 | p...@cypherpunks.ca 0.68% |1 | 0.50% | 6328 | f...@cisco.com 0.68% |1 | 0.49% | 6164 | p...@frobbit.se 0.68% |1 | 0.45% | 5654 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.68% |1 | 0.44% | 5502 | nscl...@gmx.de 0.68% |1 | 0.41% | 5235 | c...@a.org 0.68% |1 | 0.41% | 5212 | pe...@akayla.com 0.68% |1 | 0.40% | 5074 | wjh...@hardakers.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 146 |100.00% | 1263211 | Total
Re: When to adopt a WG I-D
To be honest at this point I'm sort of reflexively anti-process-documents, unless there's an actual problem that needs actual solution. Which is why this isn't a process document. Watching this thread, I sense the authors trying hard not to make a process document, presumably because that would be hard, contentious, low probability of success, or something. But this idea that this ID is just a random collection of thoughts that folk might find interesting and therefore is informative is also pretty silly. Melinda has it right. First decide on what problem you are solving. If you can't do that, no solution (or document) will be satisfactory. IMO, this document absolutely needs to be a process document if it is to have any value. It is presumably trying to collect experience and wisdom. Presumably folk should make use of that experience and wisdom. If that is not a best practices document, what is? If this document doesn't provide guidance, in the should sense, with an explanation of why a particular practice makes sense and what can go wrong if that advice is not followed... then what good is it? The origin is a WG chairs Edu session. Turns out there was not a lot of clarity among a bunch of WG chairs about what they did and why. My assumption is that if the chairs needed some time to discuss this, the community might need that as well. If this document is clarifying, isn't that updating an existing document and charting new ground? I.e, how can this not be normative? NOTE:This draft is intentionally non-normative. It is meant as a guide to common practice, rather than as a formal definition of what is permissible. What is the difference between a guide to common practice and a BCP? Is attempting to find a difference a case of hair splitting? Thomas
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 283 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri May 31 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.71% | 19 | 6.76% | 149502 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 5.30% | 15 | 4.74% | 104777 | jul...@braga.eti.br 4.59% | 13 | 4.81% | 106323 | john-i...@jck.com 4.95% | 14 | 4.05% |89568 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 4.24% | 12 | 4.09% |90539 | s...@resistor.net 3.53% | 10 | 3.01% |66505 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.53% | 10 | 2.90% |64207 | joe...@bogus.com 3.18% |9 | 2.48% |54808 | aser...@lacnic.net 2.83% |8 | 2.49% |54963 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.77% |5 | 3.36% |74410 | r...@ipv.sx 2.47% |7 | 2.53% |56045 | jmamo...@gmail.com 2.47% |7 | 2.32% |51295 | jo...@taugh.com 2.47% |7 | 2.09% |46177 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 2.47% |7 | 2.00% |44270 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.47% |7 | 1.73% |38288 | ra...@psg.com 1.77% |5 | 1.71% |37897 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.77% |5 | 1.47% |32493 | scott.b...@gmail.com 1.41% |4 | 1.47% |32458 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.41% |4 | 1.40% |30991 | christian.oflahe...@gmail.com 1.41% |4 | 1.37% |30267 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 1.41% |4 | 1.21% |26655 | l...@netapp.com 1.41% |4 | 1.09% |24055 | ferna...@gont.com.ar 0.71% |2 | 1.77% |39031 | cb.li...@gmail.com 1.41% |4 | 1.04% |22973 | to...@isi.edu 1.06% |3 | 1.18% |26094 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.71% |2 | 1.45% |32059 | h...@cs.columbia.edu 0.71% |2 | 1.31% |28905 | rumbi...@gmail.com 1.06% |3 | 0.93% |20651 | m...@mnot.net 0.71% |2 | 1.18% |26191 | ted.i...@gmail.com 1.06% |3 | 0.76% |16908 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.06% |3 | 0.75% |16616 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.71% |2 | 1.03% |22840 | aeop...@gmail.com 0.71% |2 | 0.94% |20854 | jmp...@cisco.com 0.71% |2 | 0.91% |20202 | g...@algebras.org 0.71% |2 | 0.87% |19276 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.71% |2 | 0.81% |17837 | sistopef...@gmail.com 0.71% |2 | 0.79% |17395 | aman...@verisign.com 0.71% |2 | 0.78% |17242 | mariainesrob...@googlemail.com 0.71% |2 | 0.78% |17142 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.71% |2 | 0.72% |15959 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.71% |2 | 0.69% |15241 | f...@cisco.com 0.71% |2 | 0.68% |15102 | l...@pi.nu 0.71% |2 | 0.65% |14361 | lber...@labn.net 0.71% |2 | 0.64% |14208 | np...@lca.org.ls 0.71% |2 | 0.64% |14122 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 0.71% |2 | 0.64% |14066 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.71% |2 | 0.62% |13706 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 0.71% |2 | 0.60% |13351 | p...@frobbit.se 0.71% |2 | 0.60% |13325 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.71% |2 | 0.58% |12859 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.71% |2 | 0.56% |12400 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.35% |1 | 0.90% |19792 | rogag...@cisco.com 0.71% |2 | 0.53% |11788 | swm...@swm.pp.se 0.71% |2 | 0.53% |11742 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.35% |1 | 0.85% |18711 | war...@kumari.net 0.35% |1 | 0.84% |18507 | ya...@cnnic.cn 0.35% |1 | 0.69% |15151 | me...@globetel.com.ph 0.35% |1 | 0.59% |13137 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.59% |13110 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.35% |1 | 0.59% |12940 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.35% |1 | 0.53% |11618 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.35% |1 | 0.50% |11052 | yi.ji...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.48% |10556 | jgu...@csc.com 0.35% |1 | 0.45% |10043 | vinay...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.43% | 9556 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.35% |1 | 0.43% | 9519 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.35% |1 | 0.40% | 8855 | jiangsh...@huawei.com 0.35% |1 | 0.40% | 8845 | morei...@nic.br 0.35% |1 | 0.38% | 8490 | ebur...@standardstrack.com 0.35% |1 | 0.38% | 8360 | rsouza@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.37% | 8092 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.35% |1 | 0.36% | 7895 | droma...@avaya.com 0.35% |1 | 0.35% | 7799 | ma...@isc.org 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7595 | tnad...@lucidvision.com 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7555 | ptha...@broadcom.com 0.35% |1 | 0.33% | 7406 | o...@cisco.com 0.35% |1 | 0.33% | 7386 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.33% | 7316 | d...@cridland.net 0.35% |1 | 0.29% | 6466 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 0.35% |1 | 0.29% | 6439 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.35% |1 | 0.29% | 6435 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.29% | 6383 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.35% |1 | 0.28% | 6274 | b...@nostrum.com 0.35% |1 | 0.28% | 6247 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.35% |1 |
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 149 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri May 24 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 0.67% |1 | 28.96% | 458641 | wmwang2...@hotmail.com 12.75% | 19 | 9.43% | 149309 | john-i...@jck.com 12.08% | 18 | 8.28% | 131074 | mo...@network-heretics.com 5.37% |8 | 4.16% |65831 | ma...@isc.org 4.70% |7 | 3.42% |54157 | jab...@hopcount.ca 4.03% |6 | 3.06% |48437 | s...@resistor.net 4.03% |6 | 2.00% |31668 | ra...@psg.com 3.36% |5 | 2.46% |38892 | d3e...@gmail.com 3.36% |5 | 2.37% |37601 | joe...@bogus.com 3.36% |5 | 2.32% |36759 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.36% |5 | 2.21% |34948 | y...@checkpoint.com 3.36% |5 | 1.85% |29302 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 2.01% |3 | 2.50% |39573 | a...@yumaworks.com 2.01% |3 | 1.24% |19594 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.01% |3 | 1.18% |18718 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.34% |2 | 1.05% |16594 | bmann...@isi.edu 1.34% |2 | 0.99% |15622 | o...@gih.com 1.34% |2 | 0.94% |14898 | jul...@braga.eti.br 1.34% |2 | 0.88% |13975 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.34% |2 | 0.86% |13649 | s...@hactrn.net 1.34% |2 | 0.86% |13635 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.34% |2 | 0.80% |12725 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.34% |2 | 0.74% |11717 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.34% |2 | 0.73% |11526 | jo...@taugh.com 0.67% |1 | 1.10% |17501 | sprom...@unina.it 0.67% |1 | 0.97% |15328 | st...@shinkuro.com 0.67% |1 | 0.80% |12736 | ogawa.kent...@lab.ntt.co.jp 0.67% |1 | 0.75% |11936 | agma...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.65% |10346 | jmamo...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.64% |10099 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 0.67% |1 | 0.60% | 9569 | o...@ogud.com 0.67% |1 | 0.60% | 9457 | f...@cisco.com 0.67% |1 | 0.59% | 9378 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.67% |1 | 0.57% | 9040 | kotecha_ka...@yahoo.com 0.67% |1 | 0.56% | 8946 | vinay...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.54% | 8557 | d...@1-4-5.net 0.67% |1 | 0.52% | 8301 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.67% |1 | 0.51% | 8057 | sarikaya2...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.49% | 7828 | b...@nostrum.com 0.67% |1 | 0.48% | 7548 | jcur...@istaff.org 0.67% |1 | 0.45% | 7121 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.67% |1 | 0.45% | 7080 | akat...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.44% | 7018 | br...@innovationslab.net 0.67% |1 | 0.44% | 7005 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 0.67% |1 | 0.42% | 6688 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.42% | 6602 | superu...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.41% | 6415 | ray.bel...@nominet.org.uk 0.67% |1 | 0.40% | 6405 | barryle...@computer.org 0.67% |1 | 0.40% | 6355 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.67% |1 | 0.38% | 6072 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.67% |1 | 0.37% | 5937 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.67% |1 | 0.36% | 5631 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.67% |1 | 0.35% | 5584 | bortzme...@nic.fr 0.67% |1 | 0.35% | 5558 | m...@mnot.net 0.67% |1 | 0.35% | 5489 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.67% |1 | 0.34% | 5388 | d...@virtualized.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 149 |100.00% | 1583820 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 151 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri May 17 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 9.27% | 14 | 9.58% | 113593 | mo...@network-heretics.com 9.27% | 14 | 7.82% |92650 | to...@isi.edu 7.28% | 11 | 6.76% |80173 | ted.le...@nominum.com 3.97% |6 | 6.47% |76736 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.31% |5 | 3.67% |43481 | s...@resistor.net 3.31% |5 | 3.63% |43035 | nar...@us.ibm.com 3.31% |5 | 3.34% |39531 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 3.31% |5 | 3.00% |35548 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.31% |5 | 2.98% |35297 | j...@joelhalpern.com 3.31% |5 | 2.72% |32293 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 2.65% |4 | 3.17% |37539 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.65% |4 | 2.09% |24748 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.65% |4 | 1.96% |23226 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.99% |3 | 2.20% |26128 | john-i...@jck.com 1.99% |3 | 1.73% |20523 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 1.32% |2 | 2.05% |24243 | wmwang2...@hotmail.com 1.99% |3 | 1.36% |16166 | swm...@swm.pp.se 1.32% |2 | 1.92% |22726 | a...@yumaworks.com 1.32% |2 | 1.68% |19888 | flu...@cisco.com 1.32% |2 | 1.48% |17563 | far...@umn.edu 1.32% |2 | 1.41% |16770 | tv...@eyeconomics.com 1.32% |2 | 1.41% |16659 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.32% |2 | 1.36% |16115 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.32% |2 | 1.22% |14478 | scott.b...@gmail.com 1.32% |2 | 1.21% |14343 | joe...@bogus.com 1.32% |2 | 1.21% |14321 | f...@cisco.com 1.32% |2 | 1.15% |13634 | d...@virtualized.org 1.32% |2 | 1.10% |13000 | bcla...@cisco.com 1.32% |2 | 1.01% |11932 | l...@cisco.com 1.32% |2 | 0.89% |10500 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.66% |1 | 1.15% |13606 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.66% |1 | 1.07% |12720 | leo.liub...@huawei.com 0.66% |1 | 1.00% |11897 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.66% |1 | 0.97% |11460 | cb.li...@gmail.com 0.66% |1 | 0.95% |11263 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 0.66% |1 | 0.95% |11228 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.66% |1 | 0.90% |10616 | tobias.gond...@gondrom.org 0.66% |1 | 0.86% |10205 | agma...@gmail.com 0.66% |1 | 0.74% | 8787 | superu...@gmail.com 0.66% |1 | 0.74% | 8716 | j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de 0.66% |1 | 0.68% | 8105 | b...@nostrum.com 0.66% |1 | 0.64% | 7568 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.66% |1 | 0.62% | 7387 | aeop...@gmail.com 0.66% |1 | 0.62% | 7308 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.66% |1 | 0.60% | 7137 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.66% |1 | 0.60% | 7108 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.66% |1 | 0.55% | 6518 | barryle...@computer.org 0.66% |1 | 0.52% | 6160 | s...@cisco.com 0.66% |1 | 0.52% | 6119 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.66% |1 | 0.51% | 6090 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.66% |1 | 0.51% | 6020 | thierry.mor...@connotech.com 0.66% |1 | 0.48% | 5682 | m...@sap.com 0.66% |1 | 0.48% | 5650 | pe...@akayla.com 0.66% |1 | 0.47% | 5562 | l...@pi.nu 0.66% |1 | 0.46% | 5476 | d...@ewellic.org 0.66% |1 | 0.43% | 5041 | ra...@psg.com 0.66% |1 | 0.41% | 4902 | malcolm.be...@zte.com.cn +--++--+ 100.00% | 151 |100.00% | 1185170 | Total
Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
+1 to what Jari says below. From my perspective, the important things to keep in mind: 1) Discuss criteria should be principles, not rigid rules. The details of the issue at hand always matter, and it will sometimes come down to judgement calls where reasonable individuals just might disagree. And if we try to replace judgement with rigid, overly specified rules, we surely won't like the results. i.e, the process requires we do X, when X is really a bad outcome overall. 2) There will always be judgement calls, where an AD and an author (or WG) don't necessarily agree. Fine tuning the rules won't fix that. By default, when there is disagreement, the presumption needs to be the AD could be right and needs to be convinced. That is the essence of what a DISCUSS is intended to be. If the dialog between author/WG/AD is not progressing, bring in someone else. I.e., the way to overrule a stubborn AD is to convince other ADs (and/or WG members) to weigh in based on the merits. If an author/WG can't do that, that says something... Thomas Jari Arkko jari.ar...@piuha.net writes: I feel that the discussion is stuck on the different perceptions on whether an AD's actions are either blocking reasonable progress, or an essential correction to a mistake that went undetected. I'd like to make a couple of observations. First of all, we at the IESG process 10-25 documents every second week, and several points (comment or discuss) are raised for each one. Given that both working groups and the IESG consist of humans, I'm guessing that none of us are making perfect decisions all the time. While the Discuss Criteria document is very useful, I'd warn against trying to codify the proper behaviour too much. It would be very difficult, and ultimately it comes down to making a call on whether an issue is really crucial for the Internet or not. I feel that the discussion and pressure from other ADs and authors and the rest of the working group is a more useful avenue to ensure that we really are fixing the necessary bugs and only those. And I know you are doing that - lets make sure we keep doing it. If you see something, say something. It is everyone's responsibility to try to do the right thing, and if you feel it is not happening, say so. I think the current IESG has a very good mood for receiving feedback and acting on it. (Speaking as the longest serving member in the current IESG, who frequently gets shown to be wrong by other ADs or WG folk.) In addition, as discussed separately, moving more of the issue resolution to the open and to the WG is a good thing. Jari
Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]
I don't think the IETF needs to be in the profile/resume business. There are plenty of other places that do a fine job already. What I do think the IETF should do is *require* that participants identify themselves. That means knowing who they are (a name and email contact) and an affiliation. For 80% of the participants, this info is not very hard to figure out (see below). But we also have participants that use obscure email handles that don't correlate to anything obvious, whether a real person or to a name in the list of registered attendees, etc. I suspect these folk are *not* intenending to be anonymous participants, but in practice they are. And yes, knowing who someone is, their background and who they work for is important to me in figuring out how to guage their input. E.g., I would likely pay more attention to an operator's comments on a proposed use case than from someone else. How to figure out who someone is: 1) look at the list of registered attendees. (but that doesn't include email addresses, so no clean way to map attendee name into email addresses being used). Also, for some reason, some people who register don't bother giving an affiliation. In some cases this is intentional, but there are others where it doesn't make sense (e.g., someone who has worked for the same employer for 10+ years and is still working for that employer). E.g., if you look at the registration list for Orland0, fully 180 names don't list affiliations -- and there are a number pretty obvious surprises in that list... 2) look at email addresses. But nowadays they are often generic (e.g., gmail) and don't correlate back to an obvious sponsor. 3) Google names, look at authorship info in RFCs, linked in, etc. Works in a lot of cases, but is sometimes more work than seems appropriate. And for those with less history in the IETF, knowing where to look for this stuff is trickier. But even doing the above, there are people participating (e.g., posting on the IETF list) who I don't know who they are, even after spending some time trying to figure who who they are and what their background is. For an open standards organization, that somehow doesn't seem quite right. Thomas
Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]
Hi John. I agree there are a number of specific cases where there is no simple/obvious way to handle. I'd be OK with something fairly simple as unaffiliated or consultant or something more nuanced. But I'd like to think those are edge cases (but could of course be wrong in how common they are). I was specifically thinking of much more obvious cases where I'm pretty sure that their main employers is sending them. One thing I've done at times is look at the attendance figures at meetings to try to identify some of the entities that send the most attendees to meetings (e.g.,, to track trends). As a result of that, I've noticed that the number of no affiliation given seems high to me, and I've seen obvious cases where I know the person and where they were working in the past, and then when I check later, it turns out they are still working at the same place (e.g. a Cisco, Google or Huawei). Maybe its just the case that the registration form makes it to easy to leave it blank. Just loooking at the list https://www.ietf.org/registration/ietf86/attendance.py?sortkey=3login= I easily counted 20 names of folk I know that don't list an affiliation, where if any of them have changed employers, that number would likely be very small. Thomas
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 138 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri May 10 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.25% | 10 | 8.90% |93387 | ma...@isc.org 6.52% |9 | 7.85% |82311 | nar...@us.ibm.com 7.25% | 10 | 6.58% |69033 | john-i...@jck.com 4.35% |6 | 4.92% |51589 | sc...@kitterman.com 4.35% |6 | 3.90% |40851 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 4.35% |6 | 3.70% |38841 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 3.62% |5 | 3.33% |34916 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.90% |4 | 3.30% |34585 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 2.90% |4 | 3.27% |34333 | alh-i...@tndh.net 2.90% |4 | 3.06% |32061 | bcla...@cisco.com 2.90% |4 | 3.05% |31953 | daedu...@btconnect.com 2.90% |4 | 2.61% |27392 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 2.17% |3 | 2.15% |22521 | do...@dougbarton.us 2.17% |3 | 1.80% |18858 | joe...@bogus.com 2.17% |3 | 1.63% |17072 | wor...@ariadne.com 2.17% |3 | 1.43% |14970 | ra...@psg.com 1.45% |2 | 1.97% |20627 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 1.45% |2 | 1.48% |15501 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.45% |2 | 1.46% |15269 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.45% |2 | 1.43% |15015 | s...@resistor.net 1.45% |2 | 1.30% |13638 | s...@internet2.edu 1.45% |2 | 1.28% |13407 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.45% |2 | 1.25% |13073 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 1.45% |2 | 1.19% |12444 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.45% |2 | 1.16% |12116 | derhoe...@gmx.net 1.45% |2 | 1.15% |12093 | j...@jlc.net 1.45% |2 | 1.06% |11096 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.45% |2 | 1.05% |11035 | m...@sap.com 1.45% |2 | 1.04% |10900 | pe...@akayla.com 0.72% |1 | 1.61% |16854 | o...@nlnetlabs.nl 0.72% |1 | 1.58% |16521 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 0.72% |1 | 1.41% |14746 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 0.72% |1 | 1.02% |10730 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.72% |1 | 0.94% | 9817 | war...@kumari.net 0.72% |1 | 0.92% | 9697 | c...@daydream.com 0.72% |1 | 0.87% | 9082 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.72% |1 | 0.82% | 8628 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.72% |1 | 0.79% | 8334 | gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com 0.72% |1 | 0.78% | 8214 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.72% |1 | 0.73% | 7621 | jouni.nos...@gmail.com 0.72% |1 | 0.69% | 7232 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.72% |1 | 0.68% | 7184 | r...@rfc-editor.org 0.72% |1 | 0.68% | 7109 | superu...@gmail.com 0.72% |1 | 0.67% | 6977 | mcqui...@pobox.com 0.72% |1 | 0.63% | 6643 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 0.72% |1 | 0.62% | 6543 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.72% |1 | 0.62% | 6505 | barryle...@computer.org 0.72% |1 | 0.62% | 6475 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.72% |1 | 0.60% | 6336 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.72% |1 | 0.58% | 6130 | d...@dcrocker.net 0.72% |1 | 0.58% | 6070 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 0.72% |1 | 0.57% | 5934 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.72% |1 | 0.55% | 5817 | c...@tzi.org 0.72% |1 | 0.55% | 5765 | jo...@taugh.com 0.72% |1 | 0.55% | 5731 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 0.72% |1 | 0.53% | 5607 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.72% |1 | 0.53% | 5583 | env...@rolamasao.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 138 |100.00% | 1048772 | Total
Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
Just a few points... Michael Richardson mcr+i...@sandelman.ca writes: I'll repeat what has been said repeatedly in the newtrk and related discussions. The step from ID to RFC is too large because we are essentially always aiming for STD rather than PS. If we are unwilling to bring RFC back to a place were it does not equal STD, then we need to create a new category of document which amounts to fully baked ID. Things like IANA allocations could occur at that point. In the days of dot-boom it was not unusual to see widespread implementation very early in the ID process and even interop and experimental deployment. While this still occurs for quite a number of things (and sometimes it's a problem that the ID can not be changed as a result), there is an equal amount of wait for the RFC to come out. I suspect there is a bit of rose colored reminiscing of history. The world has changed, significantly. For example, there has been massive consolidation in industry. There simply are fewer entities doing implementations today. 15 years ago, it was common to see a half dozen or more implementations from different (often smaller) entities, even before a document got out of a WG. Nowadays, the cost of doing an implementation (for a company) is in some sense much higher, and business realities make companies *very* selective in what they implement and put into a product. I suspect that the notion that if the IETF published documents more quickly industry would implement them more quickly/frequently is wishful thinking. Michael Richardson mcr+i...@sandelman.ca writes: It's what Carsten said. 1) this idea is baked enough for cross-area review to make sense. 2) the protocol is not going to change significantly, one could implement. 3) any future changes need thus to take into account impact on existing implementations... BUT that doesn't mean that we can't change things. Like it or not, 2 and 3 are contradictory. From an interoperability perspective, the difference between not change significantly and change a lot is irrelevant once you have deployments. Change (in the behavior or wire format) is change and breaks interoperability, no matter how big or small. Hannes Tschofenig hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net writes: b) There is no interest to research where delay really happen. I don't think that is true. Jari has pointed to his work. I think there is actually quite a lot of understanding of where the delays are. But fixing them is really really hard. Blaming the tail end or the IESG for the problems has always been the easy target. The reality (IMO) is that the place where improvements are needed is within the WG and on having authors be more responsive. But history suggests there are no easy fixes here. Randy Bush ra...@psg.com writes: A basic question, then, is whether we think these absolute numbers and these proportions of time are reasonable and appropriate for the IETF to be/remain effective? seems pretty reasonable to me. from personal experience, the iesg and rfced add useful value. +1 Like everyone, I wish things moved more quickly, but every attempt I've ever seen that tries to speed things up ends up reducing the quality or having some other undesirable side effect. The bottom line is that getting a good spec requires iteration, and reviews from a broad set of parties. That is best done *sequentially*. And given the limited cycles the (volunteer) community as a whole has, you can't easily change these dynamics. We've seen many attempts to reduce the overall time by trying to overlap reviews and steps, but that has the side effect of losing *sequential* *iteration* (where each new review reviews the previous set of additions/changes). IMO, overlapping steps is dangerous and leads to poor quality. being in a many-year process of getting a technology through the saussage machine, it's the wg that feels to me to be the most inefficient part of the process. i attribute this to email not being the best medium, and meetings being too short and too far between. but that is purely subjective. If you want to speed up the process, focus on how to *increase* the amount of iteration you get (i.e., revised drafts) while at the same time *reducing* the time between revised drafts. If you look at the delays documents encounter (both in WG and in IESG review), the killer is long times between document revisions. Focus on understanding the *why* behind that and what steps could be taken to make improvements. And finally, a big reason the IESG review is where things happen is that it *really* is the last time one has to verify that a document is ready to go. With the limited cycles we all have, there will always be a tendancy to not deal with a document until the point of this is your last chance. Nothing like a *real* deadline to motivate people to finally deal with a document, before it's too late. Thomas
Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
Good point. I guess the obvious answers are not enough cycles and, for newer authors, uncertainty about how to get stuff done, but are there other less obvious answers? (Input here might really help the IESG discussion btw since in the nature of things, we're less likely to realise what newer or less frequent participants find problematic.) One possible step is to have WG Chairs be *managers*, like they are supposed to be. That means the equivalent of having project plans. For a given document, come up with a (reasonable, pragmatic, workable) schedule for getting reviews, discussion, revision, repeat. And then get committments from parties (authors, reviewers, etc.) to deliver. And followup if they don't... The current cycle too often seems to be more like new version posted. Wait if anyone reviews. Some reviews eventually, maybe. Oh, IETF meeting coming, time for a revision. But with meeting approaching, there are a zillion docs and cycles are limited. Rather haphazard, with too many documents effectively only being revised once per meeting cycle. WGs make the most progress when authors respond quickly (within days) to reviews, and do so on the list discussing possible text revisions. You get much quicker and substantive discussion that way and it becomes clear whether folk are converging. Contrast that with ask for reviews. Wait a month or two. New document appears that says this reflects comments we got, go read. Delays between review/response tend to feed upon themselves. Folk forget context, etc., making it more of an effort to go back and remember their reviews, etc. Too much of WG activites are best effort where volunteers (who are busy and may not actually have the experience to do things optimally) are expected magically to just know how things are supposed to work make progress. Reality is a bit different. Two concrete suggestions: 1) have WGs do the managing role more proactively 2) mentor authors and others a bit more to encourage them how best to operate Thomas
Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
Adrian Farrel adr...@olddog.co.uk writes: Well said, Thomas. Two concrete suggestions: 1) have WGs do the managing role more proactively 2) mentor authors and others a bit more to encourage them how best to operate Which I suspect means... 0) have ADs manage/mentor the WG chairs more proactively. Absolutely. But that is why the nomcom is supposed to select ADs that have *management* capabilities as well as technical skills. Almost certainly a case of if I had less work to do I would have more time to do the things that would reduce my workload. :-) Well, this is why you get paid the big bucks. Not to put too fine a point on in, but ADs need to manage their time, and they need to balance between the immediate and the long term. They have to do *both*, and especially NOT neglect longer-term stuff that will have real and signficant, but not immediate benefits. WG chairs might like to comment, but I suspect that one lunchtime training session every four months does not constitute proactive management. This would help and could be part of a comprehensive approach. But ADs also need to lay down expectations on WG chairs, and *grade* and *evaluate* WG Chair performance. WG chairs also don't have cycles... And ADs seem reluctant to step in and make management changes that really often are needed to change the dynamices within WGs that are not delivering... Thomas
Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
Ray Pelletier rpellet...@isoc.org writes: Provide WG Chairs the monitoring tools they need to be proactive - Action Tracker, what do I need to do today data tracker views. Same for AD. Same for authors and their mentors, if any. Tools may help in some cases (IESG, chairs), but the fundamental problem is not tools. It's about work culture, setting proper expectations (and communicating them to everyone), and having accountability and followup to fix things when stuff isn't happening. Thomas
Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net writes: The issue with providing management assistance is to focus on managing the work. That's an organizational orientation, not just a tracking thing. It's about getting clarity of the work to be done and of getting folks to do the work of contributing, writing, reviewing, and debating in a timely manner, and achieving forward progress in a timely manner. Few working groups have enough detail to juggle to make this something that hinges on the tools. Strongly agree here. Let me expand further on work plan and project management. It needs to be done on a per-document basis. I.e., Wouldn't it be nice if every WG document was revised 3 times between meetings? I bet that alone would change dynamics (assuming there were substantive changes)... But it extends to the WG as a whole. WGs have a finite number of cycles. There are always a small number of core players (whether editor, reviewer, etc.), and if you spread their resources too thinly, a WG starts having problems. Few WGs acknowledge that and try to manage it. Managing it means: 1) identifying core documents that are priority, and minimizing distractions that will take cycles away from the priority deliverables. 2) It may mean making concious decisions not to work on some documente *yet* in order to concentrate resources where it matters 3) it means tying the work plan directly back to the charter. If the two aren't in sync, one or both need changing. 4) It means recognizing that there are real limits to how many documents a WG can (credibly) work on at any one time. (Too many WGs have lots of marginal documents that suck cycles away from the critical ones.) How many WGs say no to marginal documents? Thomas
Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
Pete Resnick presn...@qti.qualcomm.com writes: On 5/3/13 7:59 AM, Thomas Narten wrote: Like everyone, I wish things moved more quickly, but every attempt I've ever seen that tries to speed things up ends up reducing the quality or having some other undesirable side effect. Can you talk a bit more about this, including some examples? Sorry, what I had in mind here was what I'll call process tweaks. Attempts at changing the process to speed reviews, dispense with reviews, overlap reviews, etc. No, our processes aren't perfect. But we have bigger problems that are not due to process that we'd do better to focus on rather than trying to tweak the process in (IMO) minor ways. We should focussing more on *root* *causes* and what concrete, pragmatic steps can be taken to mitigate them. I'm trying to reconcile the concern that we end up reducing the quality Again, I was thinking of proposals for process (or operational) changes that attempt to shorten things by overlapping or removing reviews or steps, trying to get the IESG to do less review (e.g., ADs should only review looking at topics that are defined by their area) and otherwise focus on the *process* as being the problem. and that we NOT neglect longer-term stuff that will have real and significant, but not immediate benefits. ADs have finite resources and can't accomplish both immediate and longer-term stuff maximally all of the time. My inclination would be to say, If they are in conflict, weight the longer-term over the immediate, even if that might result in some reducing of quality on any single document. Am I over-reading your earlier message to say that you think the weighting should go toward the immediate? You have it right. And I meant longer-term stuff in a general sense. There are many topics that are not immediate, but could be important long term. Spend enough time on long term so that it is not neglected. You have to do both. But you must also MUST do long term stuff. I think we agree that doing the longer-term stuff will end up with increased quality over the long term, but doing more of the longer-term stuff is sure to reduce the amount of time spent on immediate, which means document reviews and therefore some short term lowering of quality. Is that OK, or is that an example of the kind of thing we've attempted that ends up with bad results? It's easy to fall back to the comfort zone, which is doing the bi-weekly document reviews and such. I.e., the day-to-day operational stuff. What's more important to the IETF? Spending time on one questionable (but quite possibly irrelevant) document to make it better before it gets published? Or getting the IETF as a whole to work better and more efficiently and produce better product? Thomas
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 226 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri May 3 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.08% | 16 | 6.62% | 118279 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.54% |8 | 3.01% |53739 | ves...@tana.it 3.54% |8 | 3.01% |53683 | ted.le...@nominum.com 3.10% |7 | 3.27% |58437 | mstjo...@comcast.net 2.65% |6 | 3.25% |58037 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.10% |7 | 2.78% |49615 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 2.65% |6 | 2.98% |53257 | ma...@isc.org 2.65% |6 | 2.63% |47042 | john-i...@jck.com 2.65% |6 | 2.25% |40249 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.65% |6 | 2.16% |38663 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 2.21% |5 | 2.52% |45015 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 1.33% |3 | 2.78% |49662 | bcla...@cisco.com 2.21% |5 | 1.82% |32465 | s...@resistor.net 1.77% |4 | 1.88% |33577 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.33% |3 | 2.29% |40956 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 1.77% |4 | 1.74% |31013 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 1.33% |3 | 2.17% |38828 | ron.even@gmail.com 1.77% |4 | 1.73% |30888 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.77% |4 | 1.70% |30432 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 1.33% |3 | 1.89% |33774 | m...@tail-f.com 1.77% |4 | 1.42% |25424 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.77% |4 | 1.39% |24880 | d...@virtualized.org 1.77% |4 | 1.32% |23552 | c...@tzi.org 1.77% |4 | 1.27% |22638 | ra...@psg.com 1.33% |3 | 1.51% |27063 | daedu...@btconnect.com 1.33% |3 | 1.47% |26319 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.33% |3 | 1.31% |23482 | huit...@microsoft.com 1.33% |3 | 1.19% |21193 | f...@cisco.com 0.88% |2 | 1.57% |27991 | superu...@gmail.com 1.33% |3 | 1.12% |20073 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.33% |3 | 1.08% |19212 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.88% |2 | 1.43% |25595 | v...@cisco.com 1.33% |3 | 0.99% |17645 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.88% |2 | 1.34% |23906 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.88% |2 | 1.10% |19607 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 0.88% |2 | 0.87% |15599 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.88% |2 | 0.86% |15394 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.88% |2 | 0.81% |14531 | petit...@acm.org 0.88% |2 | 0.81% |14489 | m...@lilacglade.org 0.88% |2 | 0.78% |13979 | s...@internet2.edu 0.88% |2 | 0.77% |13822 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.88% |2 | 0.73% |13020 | dhark...@lounge.org 0.88% |2 | 0.73% |12958 | joe...@bogus.com 0.88% |2 | 0.71% |12677 | sc...@kitterman.com 0.88% |2 | 0.71% |12675 | martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu 0.88% |2 | 0.70% |12569 | o...@cisco.com 0.44% |1 | 1.15% |20467 | cpign...@cisco.com 0.88% |2 | 0.70% |12419 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.88% |2 | 0.69% |12365 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.88% |2 | 0.67% |12024 | l...@netapp.com 0.88% |2 | 0.58% |10320 | francis.dup...@fdupont.fr 0.44% |1 | 0.91% |16207 | acoo...@cdt.org 0.44% |1 | 0.88% |15662 | l...@cisco.com 0.44% |1 | 0.76% |13588 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.44% |1 | 0.63% |11197 | leo.liub...@huawei.com 0.44% |1 | 0.58% |10389 | ed.le...@neustar.biz 0.44% |1 | 0.55% | 9818 | barryle...@computer.org 0.44% |1 | 0.49% | 8714 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.44% |1 | 0.49% | 8683 | jdr...@juniper.net 0.44% |1 | 0.48% | 8605 | johnsonhammo...@hushmail.com 0.44% |1 | 0.46% | 8216 | d...@1-4-5.net 0.44% |1 | 0.46% | 8174 | glenz...@gmail.com 0.44% |1 | 0.45% | 8012 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.44% |1 | 0.43% | 7678 | tb...@textuality.com 0.44% |1 | 0.41% | 7363 | j...@jlc.net 0.44% |1 | 0.41% | 7302 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.44% |1 | 0.40% | 7156 | allison.man...@gmail.com 0.44% |1 | 0.40% | 7127 | lho...@nic.cz 0.44% |1 | 0.38% | 6843 | aman...@verisign.com 0.44% |1 | 0.38% | 6814 | war...@kumari.net 0.44% |1 | 0.38% | 6754 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 0.44% |1 | 0.37% | 6694 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 0.44% |1 | 0.37% | 6533 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.44% |1 | 0.36% | 6419 | ch...@ietf.org 0.44% |1 | 0.36% | 6398 | lber...@labn.net 0.44% |1 | 0.36% | 6366 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.44% |1 | 0.34% | 6090 | otr...@employees.org 0.44% |1 | 0.34% | 6034 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.44% |1 | 0.34% | 6020 | josh.howl...@ja.net 0.44% |1 | 0.33% | 5967 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.44% |1 | 0.33% | 5946 | jo...@taugh.com 0.44% |1 | 0.33% | 5930 | derhoe...@gmx.net 0.44% |1 | 0.33% | 5909 | wor...@ariadne.com 0.44% |1 | 0.33% | 5895 | m...@mnot.net 0.44%
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 96 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 26 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 9.38% |9 | 8.36% |68598 | fg...@si6networks.com 4.17% |4 | 7.84% |64307 | ted.i...@gmail.com 6.25% |6 | 5.10% |41853 | s...@resistor.net 6.25% |6 | 4.86% |39849 | b...@nostrum.com 5.21% |5 | 4.74% |38860 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 4.17% |4 | 5.14% |42159 | daedu...@btconnect.com 5.21% |5 | 3.95% |32420 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.08% |2 | 4.95% |40562 | m...@lilacglade.org 1.04% |1 | 5.25% |43055 | salvatore.danto...@uniparthenope.it 3.12% |3 | 3.12% |25623 | y...@checkpoint.com 3.12% |3 | 3.09% |25359 | l...@cisco.com 3.12% |3 | 2.80% |22947 | huit...@microsoft.com 3.12% |3 | 2.65% |21705 | framefri...@gmail.com 3.12% |3 | 2.58% |21128 | nar...@us.ibm.com 2.08% |2 | 2.93% |23992 | andrewm...@gmail.com 2.08% |2 | 1.68% |13795 | l...@netapp.com 2.08% |2 | 1.44% |11814 | w...@1wt.eu 2.08% |2 | 1.43% |11695 | m...@sap.com 2.08% |2 | 1.42% |11617 | m...@mnot.net 2.08% |2 | 1.40% |11496 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 2.08% |2 | 1.32% |10857 | pe...@akayla.com 1.04% |1 | 1.64% |13459 | ietf...@comcast.net 1.04% |1 | 1.60% |13103 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 1.04% |1 | 1.59% |13002 | sprom...@unina.it 1.04% |1 | 1.31% |10705 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.04% |1 | 1.09% | 8902 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.04% |1 | 1.06% | 8674 | clint.chap...@gmail.com 1.04% |1 | 1.05% | 8609 | markzzzsm...@yahoo.com.au 1.04% |1 | 1.05% | 8584 | tramm...@tik.ee.ethz.ch 1.04% |1 | 1.03% | 8408 | f...@cisco.com 1.04% |1 | 0.99% | 8080 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.04% |1 | 0.98% | 8075 | acoo...@cdt.org 1.04% |1 | 0.93% | 7630 | mstjo...@comcast.net 1.04% |1 | 0.90% | 7372 | d...@cridland.net 1.04% |1 | 0.86% | 7081 | p...@philkern.de 1.04% |1 | 0.83% | 6808 | rja.li...@gmail.com 1.04% |1 | 0.80% | 6531 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 1.04% |1 | 0.79% | 6441 | s...@internet2.edu 1.04% |1 | 0.77% | 6325 | d...@xpasc.com 1.04% |1 | 0.71% | 5859 | j...@joelhalpern.com 1.04% |1 | 0.71% | 5818 | to...@isi.edu 1.04% |1 | 0.70% | 5734 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.04% |1 | 0.69% | 5638 | ves...@tana.it 1.04% |1 | 0.67% | 5481 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.04% |1 | 0.64% | 5272 | i...@ietf.org 1.04% |1 | 0.60% | 4948 | jari.ar...@piuha.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 96 |100.00% | 820230 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 166 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 19 07:03:54 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 8.43% | 14 | 7.88% | 102717 | ted.le...@nominum.com 5.42% |9 | 6.32% |82361 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.82% |8 | 4.51% |58848 | dhark...@lounge.org 4.82% |8 | 4.28% |55809 | s...@resistor.net 4.22% |7 | 4.07% |53095 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 4.22% |7 | 3.69% |48105 | m...@sap.com 3.61% |6 | 3.55% |46274 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 3.01% |5 | 3.38% |44125 | daedu...@btconnect.com 3.01% |5 | 3.13% |40787 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 3.01% |5 | 3.04% |39685 | lber...@labn.net 3.01% |5 | 2.92% |38047 | l...@cisco.com 3.01% |5 | 2.68% |34928 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 3.01% |5 | 2.66% |34648 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 3.01% |5 | 2.65% |34524 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.41% |4 | 2.44% |31868 | ste...@aaa-sec.com 1.20% |2 | 3.22% |42039 | bcla...@cisco.com 2.41% |4 | 2.01% |26265 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 1.81% |3 | 2.27% |29558 | piy...@ditenity.com 1.81% |3 | 1.99% |25906 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.81% |3 | 1.89% |24681 | jmp...@cisco.com 1.81% |3 | 1.82% |23728 | h...@jpl.nasa.gov 1.81% |3 | 1.73% |22502 | eck...@cisco.com 1.81% |3 | 1.47% |19149 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.20% |2 | 1.58% |20620 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.20% |2 | 1.55% |20220 | jdr...@juniper.net 1.20% |2 | 1.34% |17510 | bmann...@isi.edu 1.20% |2 | 1.27% |16543 | mstjo...@comcast.net 1.20% |2 | 1.20% |15679 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 1.20% |2 | 1.16% |15161 | a...@yumaworks.com 1.20% |2 | 1.14% |14834 | f...@cisco.com 1.20% |2 | 1.10% |14370 | ptha...@broadcom.com 1.20% |2 | 1.07% |13969 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.20% |2 | 0.99% |12953 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 1.20% |2 | 0.96% |12572 | john-i...@jck.com 1.20% |2 | 0.93% |12070 | to...@isi.edu 1.20% |2 | 0.91% |11908 | wor...@ariadne.com 0.60% |1 | 1.15% |15015 | dcroc...@bbiw.net 0.60% |1 | 0.80% |10368 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.60% |1 | 0.78% |10163 | barryle...@computer.org 0.60% |1 | 0.77% |10025 | far...@umn.edu 0.60% |1 | 0.70% | 9176 | superu...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.70% | 9133 | sc...@kitterman.com 0.60% |1 | 0.66% | 8599 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.60% |1 | 0.62% | 8134 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.60% |1 | 0.61% | 7946 | huit...@microsoft.com 0.60% |1 | 0.60% | 7832 | d...@dcrocker.net 0.60% |1 | 0.54% | 7019 | d...@xpasc.com 0.60% |1 | 0.52% | 6823 | c...@tzi.org 0.60% |1 | 0.52% | 6816 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.60% |1 | 0.47% | 6089 | kl...@wierenga.net 0.60% |1 | 0.45% | 5838 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.60% |1 | 0.44% | 5798 | klen...@jck.com 0.60% |1 | 0.44% | 5796 | johannes.mer...@secunet.com 0.60% |1 | 0.42% | 5437 | j...@jlc.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 166 |100.00% | 1304065 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 19 07:07:07 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ +--++--+
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 19 00:53:03 EDT 2013
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 173 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 12 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.20% |9 | 4.70% |62873 | ted.le...@nominum.com 4.05% |7 | 3.16% |42214 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.47% |6 | 3.18% |42603 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.47% |6 | 2.64% |35325 | mo...@network-heretics.com 2.89% |5 | 3.02% |40419 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.89% |5 | 2.68% |35849 | eck...@cisco.com 2.89% |5 | 2.41% |32184 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 2.31% |4 | 2.96% |39570 | d...@cridland.net 2.89% |5 | 2.38% |31793 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 2.89% |5 | 2.36% |31626 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.31% |4 | 2.81% |37617 | stbry...@cisco.com 2.31% |4 | 2.72% |36426 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 2.89% |5 | 2.14% |28671 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.31% |4 | 2.70% |36191 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 1.16% |2 | 3.32% |44357 | turn...@ieca.com 2.31% |4 | 2.10% |28067 | pe...@akayla.com 2.31% |4 | 2.09% |28013 | hous...@vigilsec.com 2.31% |4 | 2.02% |27017 | jo...@taugh.com 2.31% |4 | 1.89% |25239 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.31% |4 | 1.86% |24847 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.31% |4 | 1.79% |24011 | bra...@isi.edu 0.58% |1 | 3.52% |47129 | acoo...@cdt.org 0.58% |1 | 3.28% |43830 | c...@tzi.org 1.73% |3 | 1.55% |20695 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 1.73% |3 | 1.35% |18113 | s...@resistor.net 1.73% |3 | 1.34% |17886 | to...@isi.edu 1.73% |3 | 1.30% |17378 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 1.16% |2 | 1.85% |24715 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.58% |1 | 2.06% |27500 | salvatore.danto...@uniparthenope.it 1.16% |2 | 1.39% |18635 | d...@1-4-5.net 1.16% |2 | 1.07% |14250 | barryle...@computer.org 0.58% |1 | 1.52% |20327 | r...@ipv.sx 1.16% |2 | 0.93% |12499 | s...@internet2.edu 1.16% |2 | 0.89% |11864 | wbee...@cisco.com 1.16% |2 | 0.88% |11751 | n...@cryptonector.com 1.16% |2 | 0.87% |11653 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.16% |2 | 0.82% |10914 | l...@pi.nu 1.16% |2 | 0.81% |10839 | rpellet...@isoc.org 1.16% |2 | 0.79% |10635 | st...@shinkuro.com 0.58% |1 | 0.90% |12015 | ka...@mit.edu 0.58% |1 | 0.86% |11529 | j...@wide.ad.jp 0.58% |1 | 0.76% |10179 | ptha...@broadcom.com 0.58% |1 | 0.74% | 9943 | ulr...@herberg.name 0.58% |1 | 0.66% | 8804 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.58% |1 | 0.66% | 8788 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.58% |1 | 0.63% | 8368 | joe...@bogus.com 0.58% |1 | 0.58% | 7773 | piy...@ditenity.com 0.58% |1 | 0.58% | 7727 | mstjo...@comcast.net 0.58% |1 | 0.58% | 7705 | far...@umn.edu 0.58% |1 | 0.56% | 7530 | ste...@aaa-sec.com 0.58% |1 | 0.56% | 7521 | john-i...@jck.com 0.58% |1 | 0.54% | 7207 | f...@cisco.com 0.58% |1 | 0.50% | 6688 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.58% |1 | 0.50% | 6629 | jcur...@istaff.org 0.58% |1 | 0.50% | 6624 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.58% |1 | 0.49% | 6590 | j...@jlc.net 0.58% |1 | 0.49% | 6560 | superu...@gmail.com 0.58% |1 | 0.48% | 6389 | m...@lilacglade.org 0.58% |1 | 0.47% | 6275 | h...@shrubbery.net 0.58% |1 | 0.47% | 6254 | jmp...@cisco.com 0.58% |1 | 0.47% | 6244 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 0.58% |1 | 0.45% | 6060 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.58% |1 | 0.45% | 5999 | h...@jpl.nasa.gov 0.58% |1 | 0.45% | 5975 | ch...@ietf.org 0.58% |1 | 0.44% | 5833 | war...@kumari.net 0.58% |1 | 0.43% | 5734 | tnad...@lucidvision.com 0.58% |1 | 0.41% | 5543 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.58% |1 | 0.41% | 5491 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.58% |1 | 0.41% | 5461 | d...@xpasc.com 0.58% |1 | 0.40% | 5416 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 0.58% |1 | 0.40% | 5309 | m...@mnot.net 0.58% |1 | 0.35% | 4695 | j...@jck.com 0.58% |1 | 0.35% | 4657 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.58% |1 | 0.34% | 4591 | lly...@civil-tongue.net 0.58% |1 | 0.34% | 4529 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.58% |1 | 0.29% | 3832 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 173 |100.00% | 1337992 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 99 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 5 00:53:06 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.06% |6 | 5.52% |45474 | s...@resistor.net 5.05% |5 | 4.08% |33620 | fg...@si6networks.com 4.04% |4 | 3.92% |32357 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 3.03% |3 | 4.87% |40120 | stbry...@cisco.com 4.04% |4 | 3.55% |29304 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.03% |3 | 4.16% |34318 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 3.03% |3 | 4.14% |34139 | david.bl...@emc.com 4.04% |4 | 2.95% |24285 | ted.le...@nominum.com 4.04% |4 | 2.93% |24153 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.02% |2 | 3.60% |29693 | luf...@cisco.com 3.03% |3 | 2.23% |18352 | do...@dougbarton.us 3.03% |3 | 2.05% |16875 | hous...@vigilsec.com 2.02% |2 | 2.97% |24450 | leo.liub...@huawei.com 1.01% |1 | 3.82% |31525 | michael.sch...@alcatel-lucent.com 1.01% |1 | 3.17% |26096 | piy...@ditenity.com 2.02% |2 | 2.08% |17186 | ebur...@cs.georgetown.edu 2.02% |2 | 2.02% |16651 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.02% |2 | 1.84% |15189 | mstjo...@comcast.net 2.02% |2 | 1.82% |15024 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.02% |2 | 1.63% |13472 | huit...@microsoft.com 2.02% |2 | 1.63% |13447 | susiel...@gmail.com 2.02% |2 | 1.62% |13386 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 2.02% |2 | 1.47% |12151 | jo...@taugh.com 2.02% |2 | 1.43% |11783 | swm...@swm.pp.se 2.02% |2 | 1.37% |11282 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 1.01% |1 | 1.90% |15665 | r...@ipv.sx 1.01% |1 | 1.40% |11523 | paul.doo...@nsn.com 1.01% |1 | 1.26% |10393 | scott.mansfi...@ericsson.com 1.01% |1 | 1.20% | 9904 | mike5...@gmail.com 1.01% |1 | 1.16% | 9571 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.01% |1 | 1.14% | 9362 | drafts1...@yahoo.co.uk 1.01% |1 | 1.12% | 9220 | d.r...@rocketmail.com 1.01% |1 | 1.11% | 9186 | tom.hay...@netapp.com 1.01% |1 | 1.11% | 9167 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 1.01% |1 | 1.06% | 8737 | t...@att.com 1.01% |1 | 1.02% | 8429 | thierry.mor...@connotech.com 1.01% |1 | 0.96% | 7908 | john-i...@jck.com 1.01% |1 | 0.95% | 7853 | j...@joelhalpern.com 1.01% |1 | 0.89% | 7378 | n...@cryptonector.com 1.01% |1 | 0.87% | 7176 | ka...@mit.edu 1.01% |1 | 0.85% | 7014 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 1.01% |1 | 0.84% | 6896 | david.kess...@nsn.com 1.01% |1 | 0.83% | 6879 | jason_living...@cable.comcast.com 1.01% |1 | 0.83% | 6873 | hsan...@santronics.com 1.01% |1 | 0.81% | 6678 | c...@tzi.org 1.01% |1 | 0.79% | 6540 | ste...@aaa-sec.com 1.01% |1 | 0.78% | 6462 | s...@venaas.com 1.01% |1 | 0.75% | 6214 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.01% |1 | 0.74% | 6122 | jcur...@istaff.org 1.01% |1 | 0.74% | 6066 | s...@internet2.edu 1.01% |1 | 0.73% | 5981 | joe...@bogus.com 1.01% |1 | 0.70% | 5764 | yangkun2...@gmail.com 1.01% |1 | 0.68% | 5607 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 1.01% |1 | 0.66% | 5461 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.01% |1 | 0.65% | 5367 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.01% |1 | 0.57% | 4666 | wjh...@hardakers.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 99 |100.00% | 824394 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 159 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Mar 29 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 8.18% | 13 | 18.77% | 304221 | ste...@aaa-sec.com 6.29% | 10 | 9.61% | 155782 | david.bl...@emc.com 8.81% | 14 | 6.03% |97768 | m...@sap.com 6.92% | 11 | 5.95% |96509 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 8.46% | 137043 | denis.i...@free.fr 5.03% |8 | 3.14% |50848 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.77% |6 | 2.62% |42508 | john-i...@jck.com 3.14% |5 | 2.23% |36120 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 3.14% |5 | 2.02% |32765 | c...@tzi.org 3.14% |5 | 1.88% |30418 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.52% |4 | 1.95% |31617 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.52% |4 | 1.83% |29649 | j...@joelhalpern.com 2.52% |4 | 1.72% |27886 | s...@resistor.net 2.52% |4 | 1.53% |24814 | jcur...@istaff.org 1.89% |3 | 1.52% |24716 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.89% |3 | 1.43% |23210 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.26% |2 | 1.76% |28454 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 1.89% |3 | 1.12% |18137 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.26% |2 | 1.67% |27029 | i...@jiaziyi.com 1.26% |2 | 1.39% |22609 | joel.halp...@ericsson.com 1.26% |2 | 1.04% |16820 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.26% |2 | 0.94% |15243 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.26% |2 | 0.92% |14871 | david.kess...@nsn.com 1.26% |2 | 0.91% |14825 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.26% |2 | 0.86% |14005 | d...@xpasc.com 1.26% |2 | 0.84% |13558 | mo...@network-heretics.com 1.26% |2 | 0.77% |12433 | m...@lilacglade.org 1.26% |2 | 0.75% |12226 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.26% |2 | 0.72% |11600 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.63% |1 | 0.90% |14640 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.72% |11655 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.63% |1 | 0.71% |11508 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.69% |11151 | d...@cridland.net 0.63% |1 | 0.66% |10635 | mstjo...@comcast.net 0.63% |1 | 0.58% | 9352 | jmh.dir...@joelhalpern.com 0.63% |1 | 0.55% | 8848 | jdr...@juniper.net 0.63% |1 | 0.54% | 8822 | dean.ch...@huawei.com 0.63% |1 | 0.52% | 8470 | ulr...@herberg.name 0.63% |1 | 0.51% | 8199 | glenz...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.48% | 7796 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.63% |1 | 0.48% | 7751 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.63% |1 | 0.48% | 7708 | li...@cs.ucla.edu 0.63% |1 | 0.47% | 7651 | l...@pi.nu 0.63% |1 | 0.47% | 7621 | ebur...@cs.georgetown.edu 0.63% |1 | 0.47% | 7593 | huit...@microsoft.com 0.63% |1 | 0.46% | 7376 | b...@nostrum.com 0.63% |1 | 0.44% | 7175 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.44% | 7153 | turn...@ieca.com 0.63% |1 | 0.43% | 7014 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.63% |1 | 0.42% | 6791 | joe...@bogus.com 0.63% |1 | 0.41% | 6694 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.41% | 6689 | sc...@kitterman.com 0.63% |1 | 0.40% | 6468 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.63% |1 | 0.39% | 6373 | s...@internet2.edu 0.63% |1 | 0.39% | 6300 | sak...@tanu.org 0.63% |1 | 0.38% | 6203 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 0.63% |1 | 0.38% | 6132 | war...@kumari.net 0.63% |1 | 0.38% | 6097 | m...@mrp.net 0.63% |1 | 0.37% | 5958 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.63% |1 | 0.36% | 5879 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 0.63% |1 | 0.34% | 5436 | to...@isi.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 159 |100.00% | 1620822 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 246 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Mar 22 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.88% | 12 | 6.03% | 128365 | d...@dcrocker.net 0.41% |1 | 9.07% | 192830 | f...@clock.org 3.25% |8 | 2.77% |58870 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 5.55% | 117980 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 3.25% |8 | 2.62% |55680 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.85% |7 | 2.69% |57279 | s...@resistor.net 3.25% |8 | 2.28% |48556 | jh...@pfrc.org 2.85% |7 | 2.55% |54171 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 2.85% |7 | 2.45% |52196 | john-i...@jck.com 2.85% |7 | 2.22% |47243 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 2.85% |7 | 2.11% |44918 | morrowc.li...@gmail.com 2.44% |6 | 1.78% |37880 | m...@sap.com 2.03% |5 | 1.66% |35308 | mo...@network-heretics.com 1.63% |4 | 1.95% |41580 | far...@umn.edu 2.03% |5 | 1.52% |32308 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.63% |4 | 1.90% |40312 | pau...@packetizer.com 2.03% |5 | 1.46% |31091 | jo...@taugh.com 1.63% |4 | 1.62% |34562 | tglas...@earthlink.net 1.63% |4 | 1.58% |33691 | jcur...@istaff.org 1.22% |3 | 1.75% |37246 | sprom...@unina.it 1.63% |4 | 1.24% |26325 | s...@internet2.edu 1.63% |4 | 1.19% |25366 | b...@nostrum.com 1.63% |4 | 1.16% |24673 | fgalie...@gmail.com 1.63% |4 | 1.15% |24470 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.63% |4 | 1.14% |24175 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.63% |4 | 1.10% |23358 | swm...@swm.pp.se 1.63% |4 | 0.96% |20494 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.22% |3 | 1.19% |25212 | f...@cisco.com 1.22% |3 | 1.15% |24469 | galvin+i...@elistx.com 1.22% |3 | 1.14% |24179 | ebur...@standardstrack.com 1.22% |3 | 1.01% |21428 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 1.22% |3 | 0.99% |20952 | dhark...@lounge.org 1.22% |3 | 0.90% |19124 | l...@cisco.com 1.22% |3 | 0.84% |17887 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.22% |3 | 0.83% |17733 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.22% |3 | 0.82% |17466 | o...@cisco.com 0.81% |2 | 1.05% |22230 | r...@ipv.sx 0.81% |2 | 0.83% |17648 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.81% |2 | 0.82% |17408 | dhruv.i...@gmail.com 0.81% |2 | 0.77% |16361 | acoo...@cdt.org 0.81% |2 | 0.73% |15463 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 0.81% |2 | 0.72% |15290 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.81% |2 | 0.71% |15003 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.41% |1 | 1.10% |23483 | salvatore.danto...@uniparthenope.it 0.81% |2 | 0.66% |14057 | d...@cridland.net 0.81% |2 | 0.63% |13318 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.81% |2 | 0.61% |13020 | barryle...@computer.org 0.81% |2 | 0.59% |12536 | ra...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.81% |2 | 0.57% |12176 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.81% |2 | 0.57% |12117 | m...@lilacglade.org 0.81% |2 | 0.54% |11487 | m...@sandelman.ca 0.81% |2 | 0.54% |11442 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.81% |2 | 0.52% |11068 | c...@tzi.org 0.41% |1 | 0.78% |16615 | bcla...@cisco.com 0.41% |1 | 0.57% |12083 | i.g...@comcast.net 0.41% |1 | 0.55% |11771 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.41% |1 | 0.55% |11723 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.41% |1 | 0.52% |10995 | henning.schulzri...@fcc.gov 0.41% |1 | 0.47% |10052 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.45% | 9514 | jonne.soini...@renesasmobile.com 0.41% |1 | 0.44% | 9349 | j...@mit.edu 0.41% |1 | 0.44% | 9257 | cntre...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.43% | 9098 | mmor...@cisco.com 0.41% |1 | 0.42% | 8917 | ray.bel...@nominet.org.uk 0.41% |1 | 0.40% | 8613 | mstjo...@comcast.net 0.41% |1 | 0.39% | 8236 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.41% |1 | 0.39% | 8207 | j...@jlc.net 0.41% |1 | 0.35% | 7437 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.35% | 7355 | r...@netapp.com 0.41% |1 | 0.34% | 7127 | d...@virtualized.org 0.41% |1 | 0.33% | 7086 | t...@att.com 0.41% |1 | 0.33% | 6984 | eck...@cisco.com 0.41% |1 | 0.33% | 6937 | health...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.31% | 6683 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.31% | 6584 | lber...@labn.net 0.41% |1 | 0.30% | 6472 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 0.41% |1 | 0.30% | 6443 | rog...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.30% | 6356 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.41% |1 | 0.30% | 6290 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.41% |1 | 0.29% | 6173 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.29% | 6170 | sak...@tanu.org 0.41% |1 | 0.29% | 6094 | ebur...@cs.georgetown.edu 0.41% |1 | 0.28% | 6017 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.41% |1 | 0.28% |
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 264 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Mar 15 00:53:08 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.30% | 14 | 4.47% | 108106 | ra...@qti.qualcomm.com 4.92% | 13 | 3.81% |92151 | john-i...@jck.com 3.41% |9 | 5.07% | 122709 | mstjo...@comcast.net 4.17% | 11 | 3.83% |92531 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 4.55% | 12 | 3.11% |75252 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 3.79% | 10 | 2.94% |71149 | s...@internet2.edu 0.38% |1 | 6.30% | 152389 | seragamsouve...@gmail.com 3.03% |8 | 3.63% |87718 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.52% |4 | 3.89% |94005 | eric.g...@ericsson.com 2.65% |7 | 2.65% |64000 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 3.03% |8 | 2.21% |53520 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.89% |5 | 2.10% |50726 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.89% |5 | 1.66% |40237 | marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca 1.89% |5 | 1.65% |39871 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.89% |5 | 1.36% |32894 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.89% |5 | 1.35% |32769 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.89% |5 | 1.35% |32640 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.89% |5 | 1.32% |31899 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 1.14% |3 | 1.83% |44144 | sam.a.cro...@gmail.com 1.52% |4 | 1.35% |32609 | dhark...@lounge.org 1.52% |4 | 1.23% |29663 | m...@lilacglade.org 1.14% |3 | 1.51% |36542 | eck...@cisco.com 1.52% |4 | 1.03% |24843 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 1.52% |4 | 1.01% |24366 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.14% |3 | 1.28% |30866 | flu...@iii.ca 1.52% |4 | 0.81% |19559 | i...@meetecho.com 1.14% |3 | 1.09% |26307 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.14% |3 | 1.05% |25404 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.14% |3 | 1.03% |24963 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 1.14% |3 | 0.98% |23649 | f...@cisco.com 1.14% |3 | 0.94% |22844 | droma...@avaya.com 1.14% |3 | 0.85% |20468 | jo...@taugh.com 1.14% |3 | 0.84% |20435 | l...@netapp.com 1.14% |3 | 0.79% |18989 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.14% |3 | 0.75% |18181 | aser...@lacnic.net 1.14% |3 | 0.73% |17646 | mo...@network-heretics.com 0.76% |2 | 1.00% |24170 | superu...@gmail.com 0.76% |2 | 0.72% |17423 | har...@alvestrand.no 0.76% |2 | 0.68% |16552 | nomcom-ch...@ietf.org 0.76% |2 | 0.66% |16028 | martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu 0.76% |2 | 0.63% |15341 | tramm...@tik.ee.ethz.ch 0.76% |2 | 0.58% |14023 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.76% |2 | 0.58% |14022 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.76% |2 | 0.57% |13709 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.38% |1 | 0.93% |22535 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.93% |22480 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 0.38% |1 | 0.91% |21993 | l...@cisco.com 0.38% |1 | 0.91% |21987 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.76% |2 | 0.52% |12598 | amor...@amsl.com 0.38% |1 | 0.87% |21029 | dbharring...@comcast.net 0.76% |2 | 0.49% |11764 | war...@kumari.net 0.76% |2 | 0.46% |11036 | p...@nohats.ca 0.76% |2 | 0.44% |10711 | joe...@bogus.com 0.38% |1 | 0.76% |18497 | ietf.divers...@gmail.com 0.76% |2 | 0.37% | 8856 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.38% |1 | 0.74% |18009 | r...@ipv.sx 0.38% |1 | 0.74% |17924 | suresh.krish...@ericsson.com 0.38% |1 | 0.74% |17791 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 0.38% |1 | 0.68% |16423 | falsehood...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.66% |16053 | nkuk...@verilan.com 0.38% |1 | 0.65% |15750 | pe...@akayla.com 0.38% |1 | 0.62% |14931 | grm...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.52% |12630 | bonnie.l.gor...@boeing.com 0.38% |1 | 0.47% |11372 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.38% |1 | 0.39% | 9316 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 0.38% |1 | 0.37% | 8896 | keith.dr...@alcatel-lucent.com 0.38% |1 | 0.37% | 8878 | turchanyi.g...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.36% | 8745 | cb.li...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.36% | 8680 | d...@cridland.net 0.38% |1 | 0.35% | 8527 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 0.38% |1 | 0.35% | 8370 | andrewm...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.34% | 8272 | ch...@ietf.org 0.38% |1 | 0.34% | 8248 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.38% |1 | 0.32% | 7809 | sm...@cardiff.ac.uk 0.38% |1 | 0.31% | 7569 | eburge...@standardstrack.com 0.38% |1 | 0.31% | 7481 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.30% | 7242 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.29% | 7122 | kawamu...@mesh.ad.jp 0.38% |1 | 0.28% | 6863 | wor...@ariadne.com 0.38% |1 | 0.28% | 6841 | ptha...@broadcom.com 0.38% |1 | 0.28% | 6770 | mlepinski.i...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.28% | 6714 | j...@jlc.net 0.38% |1 | 0.27% |
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 316 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Mar 8 00:53:03 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.70% | 18 | 6.08% | 142470 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 4.43% | 14 | 5.14% | 120543 | daedu...@btconnect.com 4.43% | 14 | 4.10% |96176 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 4.43% | 14 | 4.01% |93927 | l...@netapp.com 4.43% | 14 | 3.91% |91781 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.80% | 12 | 4.31% | 101097 | eric.g...@ericsson.com 4.11% | 13 | 3.86% |90442 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 2.85% |9 | 2.79% |65305 | eck...@cisco.com 2.22% |7 | 2.57% |60200 | martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu 2.22% |7 | 2.42% |56812 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.90% |6 | 1.88% |44168 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.58% |5 | 2.19% |51370 | ebur...@standardstrack.com 1.90% |6 | 1.77% |41393 | m...@lilacglade.org 1.90% |6 | 1.68% |39503 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.90% |6 | 1.64% |38543 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.58% |5 | 1.64% |38365 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 1.58% |5 | 1.46% |34280 | l...@cisco.com 1.58% |5 | 1.39% |32509 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 1.27% |4 | 1.63% |38333 | j...@jlc.net 1.27% |4 | 1.22% |28615 | s...@resistor.net 0.95% |3 | 1.53% |35928 | jdr...@juniper.net 1.27% |4 | 1.20% |28106 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 1.27% |4 | 1.14% |26756 | david.kess...@nsn.com 1.27% |4 | 1.13% |26569 | s...@internet2.edu 1.27% |4 | 1.13% |26404 | joe...@bogus.com 1.27% |4 | 1.07% |25060 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.27% |4 | 1.05% |24709 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.95% |3 | 1.30% |30558 | grm...@gmail.com 0.95% |3 | 1.23% |28897 | mstjo...@comcast.net 1.27% |4 | 0.88% |20733 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.95% |3 | 0.97% |22782 | john-i...@jck.com 0.95% |3 | 0.89% |20845 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.95% |3 | 0.87% |20476 | allison.man...@gmail.com 0.95% |3 | 0.86% |20051 | to...@isi.edu 0.95% |3 | 0.85% |19902 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.95% |3 | 0.85% |19876 | w...@mti-systems.com 0.95% |3 | 0.84% |19754 | c...@tzi.org 0.95% |3 | 0.84% |19598 | bcla...@cisco.com 0.95% |3 | 0.77% |17952 | jo...@taugh.com 0.95% |3 | 0.76% |17817 | m...@sap.com 0.95% |3 | 0.70% |16454 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 0.63% |2 | 0.96% |22455 | sprom...@unina.it 0.32% |1 | 1.14% |26814 | elw...@folly.org.uk 0.63% |2 | 0.81% |18893 | cb.li...@gmail.com 0.63% |2 | 0.79% |18591 | jo...@iecc.com 0.63% |2 | 0.79% |18442 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.63% |2 | 0.75% |17492 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.63% |2 | 0.69% |16167 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.63% |2 | 0.68% |16000 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.63% |2 | 0.66% |15561 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 0.63% |2 | 0.65% |15209 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.63% |2 | 0.63% |14871 | h...@cs.columbia.edu 0.63% |2 | 0.62% |14534 | f...@cisco.com 0.63% |2 | 0.59% |13839 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 0.63% |2 | 0.55% |12810 | d...@xpasc.com 0.63% |2 | 0.55% |12796 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.63% |2 | 0.54% |12677 | simon.lei...@switch.ch 0.63% |2 | 0.53% |12343 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.63% |2 | 0.53% |12329 | swm...@swm.pp.se 0.63% |2 | 0.49% |11398 | bra...@isi.edu 0.63% |2 | 0.48% |11369 | hen...@levkowetz.com 0.63% |2 | 0.48% |11206 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.63% |2 | 0.47% |11043 | ra...@psg.com 0.32% |1 | 0.45% |10463 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.32% |1 | 0.44% |10273 | acee.lin...@ericsson.com 0.32% |1 | 0.42% | 9798 | sam.a.cro...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.40% | 9303 | rstruik@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.37% | 8603 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.36% | 8455 | droma...@avaya.com 0.32% |1 | 0.36% | 8418 | l...@pi.nu 0.32% |1 | 0.35% | 8304 | sarikaya2...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.35% | 8113 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 0.32% |1 | 0.34% | 8082 | go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk 0.32% |1 | 0.33% | 7778 | leaf.yeh@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.32% | 7603 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.32% | 7545 | berti...@bwijnen.net 0.32% |1 | 0.32% | 7456 | gjs...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.31% | 7298 | akat...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.30% | 7014 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.32% |1 | 0.29% | 6723 | ra...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.32% |1 | 0.29% | 6683 | jh...@pfrc.org 0.32% |1 | 0.28% | 6659 | hal...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.28% | 6626 | war...@kumari.net 0.32% |1 | 0.28% | 6500 | rog...@gmail.com
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 164 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Mar 1 00:53:03 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.88% |8 | 5.91% |73893 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 3.66% |6 | 5.37% |67104 | hsan...@isdg.net 3.66% |6 | 4.88% |60980 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.66% |6 | 3.53% |44167 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.66% |6 | 3.46% |43216 | s...@resistor.net 3.66% |6 | 3.27% |40959 | petit...@acm.org 3.66% |6 | 3.12% |38970 | aser...@lacnic.net 2.44% |4 | 3.12% |39059 | grm...@gmail.com 3.05% |5 | 2.49% |31099 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.05% |5 | 2.37% |29661 | wor...@ariadne.com 2.44% |4 | 2.52% |31523 | jmp...@cisco.com 1.83% |3 | 2.93% |36630 | d...@ewellic.org 2.44% |4 | 2.31% |28836 | joe...@bogus.com 1.83% |3 | 2.87% |35852 | acoo...@cdt.org 2.44% |4 | 2.05% |25592 | war...@kumari.net 1.22% |2 | 2.80% |34990 | i...@thomasclausen.org 1.83% |3 | 1.61% |20190 | sc...@kitterman.com 1.22% |2 | 2.14% |26777 | sprom...@unina.it 1.22% |2 | 1.76% |21986 | ra...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.22% |2 | 1.24% |15565 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.22% |2 | 1.19% |14893 | f...@cisco.com 1.22% |2 | 1.18% |14804 | tramm...@tik.ee.ethz.ch 1.22% |2 | 1.15% |14423 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 1.22% |2 | 1.11% |13924 | m...@mnot.net 1.22% |2 | 1.09% |13631 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.22% |2 | 1.05% |13167 | c...@tzi.org 1.22% |2 | 1.02% |12793 | hen...@levkowetz.com 1.22% |2 | 1.02% |12784 | stefan.win...@restena.lu 1.22% |2 | 1.00% |12503 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 1.22% |2 | 0.99% |12424 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.22% |2 | 0.98% |12273 | pau...@packetizer.com 1.22% |2 | 0.98% |12230 | to...@isi.edu 1.22% |2 | 0.97% |12177 | michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de 1.22% |2 | 0.96% |12029 | cy...@daboo.name 1.22% |2 | 0.96% |12002 | l...@cisco.com 1.22% |2 | 0.92% |11521 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 1.22% |2 | 0.92% |11464 | d...@dotat.at 1.22% |2 | 0.88% |10962 | m...@lilacglade.org 1.22% |2 | 0.87% |10872 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 1.22% |2 | 0.84% |10462 | ra...@psg.com 1.22% |2 | 0.83% |10404 | m...@sap.com 0.61% |1 | 0.93% |11579 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.61% |1 | 0.88% |11004 | ed.le...@neustar.biz 0.61% |1 | 0.79% | 9863 | r...@ipv.sx 0.61% |1 | 0.73% | 9159 | b...@google.com 0.61% |1 | 0.72% | 8993 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.67% | 8331 | barryle...@computer.org 0.61% |1 | 0.66% | 8260 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.61% |1 | 0.61% | 7667 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.61% |1 | 0.59% | 7429 | falsehood...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.58% | 7315 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.61% |1 | 0.57% | 7184 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.61% |1 | 0.56% | 6989 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 0.61% |1 | 0.55% | 6927 | victor.kuarsi...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.55% | 6835 | j...@jlc.net 0.61% |1 | 0.54% | 6803 | d...@cridland.net 0.61% |1 | 0.54% | 6796 | john-i...@jck.com 0.61% |1 | 0.53% | 6668 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.61% |1 | 0.53% | 6573 | john+i...@jck.com 0.61% |1 | 0.53% | 6568 | mo...@network-heretics.com 0.61% |1 | 0.52% | 6506 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.51% | 6396 | kl...@cisco.com 0.61% |1 | 0.51% | 6364 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.61% |1 | 0.51% | 6361 | ma...@isc.org 0.61% |1 | 0.49% | 6089 | glenz...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.48% | 6066 | dorama...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.48% | 5958 | rwfra...@acm.org 0.61% |1 | 0.47% | 5818 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.61% |1 | 0.46% | 5721 | n...@inex.ie 0.61% |1 | 0.45% | 5581 | b...@nostrum.com 0.61% |1 | 0.45% | 5579 | jo...@taugh.com 0.61% |1 | 0.42% | 5243 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.61% |1 | 0.40% | 5055 | sust...@250bpm.com 0.61% |1 | 0.38% | 4790 | ch...@ietf.org 0.61% |1 | 0.38% | 4763 | internet-dra...@ietf.org 0.61% |1 | 0.38% | 4729 | ietf-secretar...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 164 |100.00% | 1250753 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 60 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Feb 22 00:53:02 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 3.33% |2 | 16.69% |80360 | roland.bl...@kit.edu 6.67% |4 | 6.60% |31766 | rpellet...@isoc.org 6.67% |4 | 4.86% |23392 | to...@isi.edu 6.67% |4 | 4.14% |19919 | p...@frobbit.se 5.00% |3 | 4.17% |20050 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 5.00% |3 | 4.09% |19692 | john-i...@jck.com 3.33% |2 | 4.57% |22005 | hal...@gmail.com 3.33% |2 | 3.17% |15244 | mo...@network-heretics.com 3.33% |2 | 3.06% |14749 | s...@resistor.net 3.33% |2 | 2.82% |13596 | war...@kumari.net 3.33% |2 | 2.68% |12916 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.33% |2 | 2.61% |12573 | amor...@amsl.com 3.33% |2 | 2.44% |11749 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.33% |2 | 2.06% | 9928 | ra...@psg.com 1.67% |1 | 2.79% |13424 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.67% |1 | 2.55% |12273 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.67% |1 | 1.99% | 9580 | b...@google.com 1.67% |1 | 1.93% | 9300 | tterr...@xiph.org 1.67% |1 | 1.85% | 8902 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.67% |1 | 1.74% | 8375 | ma...@isc.org 1.67% |1 | 1.71% | 8226 | d...@cridland.net 1.67% |1 | 1.50% | 7229 | d3e...@gmail.com 1.67% |1 | 1.48% | 7125 | mcqui...@pobox.com 1.67% |1 | 1.45% | 6976 | joe...@bogus.com 1.67% |1 | 1.44% | 6916 | listse...@me.com 1.67% |1 | 1.42% | 6817 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 1.67% |1 | 1.37% | 6579 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 1.67% |1 | 1.35% | 6504 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.67% |1 | 1.29% | 6226 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.67% |1 | 1.22% | 5872 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.67% |1 | 1.21% | 5822 | l...@netapp.com 1.67% |1 | 1.15% | 5552 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 1.67% |1 | 1.14% | 5470 | o...@cisco.com 1.67% |1 | 1.14% | 5467 | eburge...@standardstrack.com 1.67% |1 | 1.14% | 5465 | bortzme...@nic.fr 1.67% |1 | 1.13% | 5441 | s...@cs.columbia.edu 1.67% |1 | 1.03% | 4959 | m...@sap.com 1.67% |1 | 1.02% | 4924 | internet-dra...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 60 |100.00% | 481363 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 101 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Feb 15 00:53:02 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 14.85% | 15 | 13.68% | 130635 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 8.91% |9 | 7.09% |67750 | s...@resistor.net 6.93% |7 | 7.53% |71897 | ulr...@herberg.name 1.98% |2 | 11.39% | 108741 | amanc...@google.com 4.95% |5 | 3.39% |32338 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.96% |4 | 2.93% |27951 | mo...@network-heretics.com 2.97% |3 | 2.89% |27580 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 2.97% |3 | 2.46% |23500 | barryle...@computer.org 2.97% |3 | 2.01% |19205 | joe...@bogus.com 2.97% |3 | 1.75% |16737 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.98% |2 | 2.13% |20377 | i...@jiaziyi.com 1.98% |2 | 2.04% |19449 | frederick.hir...@nokia.com 1.98% |2 | 1.77% |16892 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 1.98% |2 | 1.70% |16245 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.98% |2 | 1.68% |16058 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 2.61% |24941 | vincent.r...@inria.fr 1.98% |2 | 1.54% |14714 | f...@cisco.com 1.98% |2 | 1.50% |14323 | eburge...@standardstrack.com 0.99% |1 | 2.46% |23465 | i...@thomasclausen.org 1.98% |2 | 1.40% |13356 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.98% |2 | 1.32% |12620 | wor...@ariadne.com 0.99% |1 | 1.94% |18570 | magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com 0.99% |1 | 1.59% |15178 | nabil.n.bi...@verizon.com 0.99% |1 | 1.53% |14599 | bcla...@cisco.com 0.99% |1 | 1.41% |13508 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.99% |1 | 1.29% |12308 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 1.25% |11951 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.99% |1 | 1.25% |11918 | mdav...@forfun.net 0.99% |1 | 1.02% | 9744 | r...@rfc-editor.org 0.99% |1 | 0.98% | 9351 | aret...@cisco.com 0.99% |1 | 0.90% | 8568 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.99% |1 | 0.88% | 8425 | s...@harvard.edu 0.99% |1 | 0.86% | 8194 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.99% |1 | 0.85% | 8083 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 0.99% |1 | 0.82% | 7836 | g...@gtwassociates.com 0.99% |1 | 0.73% | 6941 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 0.73% | 6931 | d...@cridland.net 0.99% |1 | 0.71% | 6788 | mstjo...@comcast.net 0.99% |1 | 0.64% | 6114 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.99% |1 | 0.64% | 6112 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.99% |1 | 0.64% | 6099 | sc...@kitterman.com 0.99% |1 | 0.64% | 6079 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.99% |1 | 0.62% | 5941 | john-i...@jck.com 0.99% |1 | 0.60% | 5732 | rbar...@bbn.com 0.99% |1 | 0.60% | 5723 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 0.99% |1 | 0.56% | 5346 | ch...@ietf.org 0.99% |1 | 0.55% | 5248 | m...@sap.com 0.99% |1 | 0.52% | 4959 | to...@isi.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 101 |100.00% | 955020 | Total
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC
I agree with many of the comments that others have raised on this thread. Just a couple of things to add that I don't recall seeing mentioned. An OAM protocol is run in the context of a Maintenance Domain, consisting of two or more nodes that run the OAM protocol, referred to as Maintenance Points (MP). This defintion could be better. I assume an MD is really more like a region, that is a collection of nodes within which (or across which) some OAM function is run. You might run, e.g., a ping. While that ping may be between to MPs, it also involves other nodes (MIs). But MIs seem to be excluded per the above. o Continuity Checking (CC): Used for verifying the liveness of a connection between two MPs. What is liveness and what is connection? Please define these terms or point to the defintions in other documents. (I have looked and have not found a precise definition.) Note: later in document: Continuity checks are used to verify the liveness of a connection or a path between two MPs, and are typically sent proactively, though they can be invoked on-demand as well. Here path and connection are used interchangably. o Connectivity Verification (CV): Allows an MP to check whether it is connected to a peer MP, and to verify that messages from the peer MP are received through the expected path. what is connected to a peer? Does that mean there is a working path? Or something else? o Path Discovery / Fault Localization: An MP uses this mechanism to trace the route to a peer MP, i.e., s/the route/the path/ ??? to identify the nodes along the path to the peer MP. When a connection fails, this mechanism also allows the MP to detect the location of the failure. o Performance Monitoring: Consists of 3 main functions o Loss Measurement (LM) - monitors the packet loss rate of a connection. what is connection in the context of technologies like TRILL (or IP for that matter)?, which do hop-by-hop forwarding and/or may do load balancing via ECMP? o Ping mode: In this mode LSP ping is used for end-to-end connectivity verification between two LERs. What's an LER? Thomas
Re: Remote Participation Services
It is good to document what we have been doing. But the text seems to focus on technology and tools... IMO, what is missing is operational Best Practices. We seem to be lacking them (are any written down?) And we don't follow them consistently, especially from one WG to another. Many of the problems I see with remote participation facilties have to do not with the technology per se, but with lack of proper training and advance testing. I get the general sense that getting the remote stuff to work is a volunteer effort where each person tries it themselves with no checklist of obvious things to do in advance, and no recourse if no one in the room can get something working. E.g., I was at an interim meeting last fall, where it looked like when the meeting started, that was the the first that folk actually looked at the facilities in the room (phone, microphones, etc.) to see how best to allow remote participants to speak. The quick conclusion was can't be done. This should have been worked out (and tested) in advance, not at the start of the meeting. Thomas
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 78 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Feb 8 00:53:02 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 10.26% |8 | 9.28% |58558 | s...@resistor.net 6.41% |5 | 7.15% |45081 | barryle...@computer.org 6.41% |5 | 6.86% |43280 | daedu...@btconnect.com 6.41% |5 | 5.23% |33011 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.56% |2 | 6.54% |41242 | sprom...@unina.it 3.85% |3 | 4.61% |29101 | d3e...@gmail.com 2.56% |2 | 4.44% |28009 | huawei.da...@huawei.com 2.56% |2 | 4.13% |26062 | luf...@cisco.com 3.85% |3 | 2.75% |17338 | joe...@bogus.com 3.85% |3 | 2.52% |15871 | n...@inex.ie 2.56% |2 | 2.71% |17085 | i...@shaftek.org 2.56% |2 | 2.47% |15590 | john-i...@jck.com 2.56% |2 | 2.33% |14725 | lber...@labn.net 2.56% |2 | 2.23% |14074 | nar...@us.ibm.com 2.56% |2 | 2.22% |14036 | l...@cisco.com 2.56% |2 | 2.17% |13701 | derhoe...@gmx.net 2.56% |2 | 2.16% |13597 | li...@cs.ucla.edu 2.56% |2 | 2.08% |13095 | s...@internet2.edu 2.56% |2 | 2.02% |12744 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 2.56% |2 | 1.95% |12291 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 2.56% |2 | 1.80% |11341 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.56% |2 | 1.63% |10265 | ra...@psg.com 1.28% |1 | 2.71% |17127 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.28% |1 | 2.22% |14000 | ch...@ietf.org 1.28% |1 | 1.73% |10887 | ron.even@gmail.com 1.28% |1 | 1.57% | 9928 | r...@ipv.sx 1.28% |1 | 1.31% | 8254 | frederick.hir...@nokia.com 1.28% |1 | 1.30% | 8187 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.28% |1 | 1.11% | 7016 | wei...@watson.org 1.28% |1 | 1.09% | 6848 | marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca 1.28% |1 | 1.08% | 6791 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.28% |1 | 1.03% | 6517 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 1.28% |1 | 0.98% | 6156 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.28% |1 | 0.94% | 5952 | julian.resc...@gmx.de 1.28% |1 | 0.93% | 5885 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.28% |1 | 0.92% | 5814 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.28% |1 | 0.91% | 5764 | rbar...@bbn.com 1.28% |1 | 0.89% | 5639 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 78 |100.00% | 630862 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 55 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Feb 1 00:53:02 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 14.55% |8 | 12.99% |66915 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 5.45% |3 | 10.74% |55297 | b...@google.com 1.82% |1 | 13.45% |69278 | dav...@iit.edu 7.27% |4 | 7.07% |36419 | daedu...@btconnect.com 7.27% |4 | 5.47% |28148 | john-i...@jck.com 7.27% |4 | 5.37% |27683 | s...@resistor.net 7.27% |4 | 4.99% |25680 | d...@dcrocker.net 5.45% |3 | 4.13% |21272 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 5.45% |3 | 3.89% |20035 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 5.45% |3 | 3.59% |18484 | l...@cisco.com 3.64% |2 | 3.23% |16656 | nar...@us.ibm.com 3.64% |2 | 3.21% |16516 | to...@isi.edu 3.64% |2 | 2.59% |13323 | m...@sap.com 3.64% |2 | 2.53% |13011 | barryle...@computer.org 1.82% |1 | 2.94% |15163 | jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com 1.82% |1 | 2.37% |12197 | droma...@avaya.com 1.82% |1 | 2.24% |11534 | l...@pi.nu 1.82% |1 | 1.91% | 9821 | flu...@cisco.com 1.82% |1 | 1.48% | 7624 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 1.82% |1 | 1.45% | 7473 | d3e...@gmail.com 1.82% |1 | 1.26% | 6499 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.82% |1 | 1.14% | 5859 | jo...@taugh.com 1.82% |1 | 0.99% | 5078 | br...@innovationslab.net 1.82% |1 | 0.98% | 5069 | tglas...@earthlink.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 55 |100.00% | 515034 | Total
Re: Last Call: draft-farrell-ft-03.txt (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie writes: Responses to Cullen below, but this is getting to the point where unless someone else who likes the idea wants to join the discussion, I'm going to conclude that we're collectively either unwilling or unable to consider 3933 experiments and regard this one as dead, which maybe means 3933 is dead-ish too, I dunno. (And before someone asks: no, I don't conclude that its just a problem with this particular experiment, and yes, I might be wrong there:-) I object to this (and have come close to saying it a few times before). One of the things that further undermines potential support for something (and further raises questions about intentions) is when people raise legitmate and substantive issues with a specific proposal, and the responses start moving away from responding to the substance to arguments like Gee, can't we even do experiments anymore, etc., etc. This document is not getting pushback because we collectively are unwilling or unable to consider experiments. Rather, from the list traffic, some folk have real issues with the content. Can you please accept that and stick to the substance? For me, as I've said before, this just isn't an experiment worth spending time on. Too little bang for the buck, and I see serious potential downsides. Can you please just accept that some people have that view? And please don't turn around with the how will we know if we don't try? line of argument. There is little need to try something as an experiment if the likely outcome seems clear. Thomas
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 97 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 25 00:53:03 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 1.03% |1 | 25.97% | 295206 | bcla...@cisco.com 5.15% |5 | 4.19% |47613 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.06% |2 | 6.06% |68919 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 5.15% |5 | 2.77% |31495 | to...@isi.edu 4.12% |4 | 3.39% |38512 | john-i...@jck.com 4.12% |4 | 2.34% |26567 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.12% |4 | 2.31% |26302 | wjordan...@gmail.com 4.12% |4 | 2.22% |25235 | c...@tzi.org 4.12% |4 | 2.14% |24365 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.06% |2 | 4.15% |47135 | jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com 3.09% |3 | 2.57% |29240 | nar...@us.ibm.com 3.09% |3 | 1.93% |21972 | jeanj...@comcast.net 3.09% |3 | 1.70% |19320 | joe...@bogus.com 2.06% |2 | 2.68% |30464 | allison.man...@gmail.com 3.09% |3 | 1.46% |16546 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.03% |1 | 2.75% |31261 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.06% |2 | 1.66% |18818 | pe...@akayla.com 2.06% |2 | 1.47% |16758 | i...@shaftek.org 2.06% |2 | 1.41% |16079 | daedu...@btconnect.com 2.06% |2 | 1.32% |15055 | fg...@si6networks.com 2.06% |2 | 1.28% |14544 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 2.06% |2 | 1.12% |12674 | d...@xpasc.com 2.06% |2 | 1.11% |12614 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 2.06% |2 | 1.02% |11578 | jo...@taugh.com 2.06% |2 | 0.96% |10862 | d...@dotat.at 1.03% |1 | 1.51% |17218 | mattmat...@google.com 1.03% |1 | 0.96% |10952 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 1.03% |1 | 0.95% |10828 | ron.even@gmail.com 1.03% |1 | 0.92% |10419 | j...@jlc.net 1.03% |1 | 0.88% |10016 | akat...@gmail.com 1.03% |1 | 0.87% | 9939 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.03% |1 | 0.82% | 9346 | jgu...@csc.com 1.03% |1 | 0.81% | 9210 | agma...@gmail.com 1.03% |1 | 0.78% | 8849 | droma...@avaya.com 1.03% |1 | 0.78% | 8814 | cpign...@cisco.com 1.03% |1 | 0.69% | 7891 | l...@netapp.com 1.03% |1 | 0.69% | 7799 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 1.03% |1 | 0.67% | 7621 | d...@cridland.net 1.03% |1 | 0.66% | 7494 | ch...@ietf.org 1.03% |1 | 0.66% | 7468 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 1.03% |1 | 0.65% | 7440 | petit...@acm.org 1.03% |1 | 0.58% | 6638 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.03% |1 | 0.57% | 6424 | s...@cs.columbia.edu 1.03% |1 | 0.56% | 6352 | ferna...@gont.com.ar 1.03% |1 | 0.56% | 6330 | huubatw...@gmail.com 1.03% |1 | 0.55% | 6270 | derhoe...@gmx.net 1.03% |1 | 0.54% | 6122 | cntre...@gmail.com 1.03% |1 | 0.53% | 5993 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.03% |1 | 0.50% | 5641 | war...@kumari.net 1.03% |1 | 0.49% | 5612 | j...@jck.com 1.03% |1 | 0.48% | 5505 | m...@sap.com 1.03% |1 | 0.47% | 5304 | m...@sandelman.ca 1.03% |1 | 0.46% | 5220 | i...@ietf.org 1.03% |1 | 0.41% | 4702 | b...@cafax.se +--++--+ 100.00% | 97 |100.00% | 1136551 | Total
Re: FW: Last Call: draft-farrell-ft-03.txt (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
I do not really have time or desire to enter an extended discussion on this document. It's pretty clear to me we just disagree. But I did want to be on record as not supporting this document so that silence wouldn't be taken as agreement or support. A few specific followups below. This document seems to have a bit of missing the forest for the trees. In the overall scheme of things, I don't believe the draft will materially help, and is at best a distraction from dealing with meaningful problems. Do you mean the experiment or if this became a permanent part of the process? Your comments read as if you're concerned mostly about the latter, and you make no mention of the former. Mostly the latter. But given I don't see this experiment being successful, I think the community has better ways of spending its limited resources. As it happens, I agree that this is not going to produce a huge improvement. But its not intended to, and modest improvements (as opposed to modest proposals:-) should also be ok. If not then we're in a worse process-rut than even I think. If there is an improvement, I expect it will be too small to be worth bothering with. And given the community's limited resources (a not insubstantial amount of collective cycles has already gone into this document), it seems better to use those resources where there is some hope of making a real difference. The crux of the issue is that any attempt at fast tracking is fundamentally about short-circuiting some aspect of our review processes. I'd prefer s/short-circuiting/speeding-up/ Sorry, I think short-circuiting is the right term. Saying you are just speeding things up is just spin. The reality is that it takes time to do quality standards/technical work. And, it takes iteration. The only kind of iteration that makes sense is sequential. Get some review, revise, then review the new version. When one tries to overlap sequential reviews, the result is almost always a poorer quality document. It is important that the revisions get reviewed by a fresh set of eyes. If you short-circuit such iteration, you inevitably get poorer quality documents. Also, it's really unfair to reviewers to have all of them stumble across the same issues. This document risks substituting process for judgement. I'd rather see more of the latter and less of the former. Disagree. The WG chairs exercise judgement to kick off the process. The IESG exercise judgement as usual with no changes. This document would use a different kind of judgement. One that is more formulaic. The kind of judgement I'd rather see is the WG/WG chairs/ADs getting together and making the case for a particular document being so important/urgent that it needs to be accelerated. And then have them work out a plan to actually get reviews in a more timely manner, etc. E.g., get committments from folk to review and revise quickly. Have a realistic workplan that folk commit to. If its not possible to get folk to commit to being responsive, doesn't that implicitely say something about the overall urgency of the document? But make that case on a number of factors (importance of having the RFC in place, etc.) rather than just on the fact that there was some sort of running code associated with it. I think incorporating the discuss criteria should be an interesting part of the experiment. (I've found them really helpful in reviewing documents these last couple of years.) Discuss criteria are an IESG-level construct, developed to find balance between nit picking by the IESG very late in the process vs. correcting real problems. That same criteria is not appropriate to apply to a document that hasn't gone through WG LC, which is at a much earlier stage of the process. No doubt, when a AD or reviewer suggests this needs fixing, the proponents will hold up this document and say you shouldn't do this, per the RFC -- you're violating the spirit of this document, only really really critical stuff needs to get addressed... No thanks. That is not what the IETF is about. I don't see how you get to No doubt... I do entirely doubt that'll happen for most all editors. This community is really good at citing process to justify whatever action (or inaction) they would like to see. Like it or not, this could become another such tool. Thomas
Re: FW: Last Call: draft-farrell-ft-03.txt (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
FWIW, I share Joe's concerns. And Stephen's responses don't really change my mind. This document seems to have a bit of missing the forest for the trees. In the overall scheme of things, I don't believe the draft will materially help, and is at best a distraction from dealing with meaningful problems. The crux of the issue is that any attempt at fast tracking is fundamentally about short-circuiting some aspect of our review processes. We should only do that very carefully. In almost all cases, individual judgement is needed as to when it is appropriate to do that. ADs/WG chairs already have some flexibility here. e.g., a WG can skip WG LC if they think its not needed. And nothing stops an AD from going to WGLC before doing a careful review. But I'd rather that be done because the case at hand justifies such an optimization, not because there is some running code checkmark that allows a special case to be fast tracked.. This document risks substituting process for judgement. I'd rather see more of the latter and less of the former. Some specifics from the doc: In summary this experiment collapses three stages of the publication process to run concurrently: working group last call, AD review, and IETF last call. Additionally, the experiment will only require IMO, it is almost never appropriate to collapse WG LC and IETF LC. In cases where it is appropriate to do so, there presumably isn't a need for a WG LC to start with. And an AD has always been able to start an IETF LC without doing a detailed review. The point, is judgement is needed, and all such cases are best handled on a case-by-case basis. Surely, we don't need a document to justify doing this in those cases where it makes sense... IETF last call. Additionally, the experiment will only require issues raised during these three stages to be addressed if they meet the IESG's Discuss criteria. The former is not formally a process and later: 4. Only comments that would be DISCUSS-worthy according to the IESG Discuss Criteria [DCRIT] need be handled during last call. Other comments can be handled or not, at the authors/editors discretion. The above can easily become a way to dismiss legitimate review comments. No doubt, when a AD or reviewer suggests this needs fixing, the proponents will hold up this document and say you shouldn't do this, per the RFC -- you're violating the spirit of this document, only really really critical stuff needs to get addressed... No thanks. That is not what the IETF is about. If it is really urgent to get a document done, it is far better to take steps to make sure the editors are engaged and responsive. That is more likely the real issue!!! It is understood that the savings in time for the end-to-end delivery of a proposed standard or experimental RFC may be modest, however, the modifications to normal IETF process will also serve as an indication of the importance that the IETF places in running code. Running code is valuable. Always has been, always will be. But we need to resist the temptation of making running code more equal than other criteria or putting it on a pedestal as some sort of holy grail. Running code by itself is just a sound bite. The importance of running code is what it tells us about a protocol specification. Just the mere fact that there is running code doesn't mean there is anything particularly enlightening to learn from an implementation. For example, running code of a router function in software doesn't necessarily say anything as to whether the code can be implemented efficiently using ASICs, which may be the real requirement. 5. The responsible AD for the WG concerned makes the decision as to whether changes are required as a result of review comments, and determines whether or not those have been completed. If significant change or extended discussion is required, or if changes are not complete within two weeks after the end of fast- track last call, then the draft is returned to the WG by the responsible AD and the document is withdrawn from the experiment. The two week figure is too stringent. The above is too prescriptive to be practical. For starters, how will the IESG telechat align with the ending of LC? Or what if an IESG member issues a defer (or will those be disallowed?). Section 4 has a bit too much detail and process in it. I'm sure it has both too much and too little actually. I.e., it probably misses some corner cases, and then what do you do given how prescriptive the rest of the section is? But overall, I see this document at best as a no-op. However, I fear that it can be used to short-circuit our review processes in a way that doesn't help the IETF and that won't really speed things up enough to justify the downsides. Thomas
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 101 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 18 00:53:02 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 17.82% | 18 | 18.44% | 184336 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 6.93% |7 | 4.59% |45869 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.95% |5 | 6.55% |65472 | st...@stewe.org 5.94% |6 | 4.84% |48342 | petit...@acm.org 3.96% |4 | 6.79% |67832 | nabil.n.bi...@verizon.com 1.98% |2 | 7.49% |74822 | bcla...@cisco.com 4.95% |5 | 4.16% |41564 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 4.95% |5 | 2.95% |29481 | ra...@psg.com 3.96% |4 | 3.03% |30257 | s...@resistor.net 3.96% |4 | 2.74% |27382 | john-i...@jck.com 0.99% |1 | 5.58% |55789 | aldrin.i...@gmail.com 3.96% |4 | 2.59% |25847 | d...@virtualized.org 2.97% |3 | 2.48% |24757 | l...@netapp.com 2.97% |3 | 2.00% |20008 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 2.97% |3 | 1.91% |19120 | m...@sap.com 1.98% |2 | 2.28% |22756 | j...@jlc.net 1.98% |2 | 1.90% |18978 | magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com 1.98% |2 | 1.60% |16022 | o...@ogud.com 1.98% |2 | 1.48% |14769 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 0.99% |1 | 1.69% |16871 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 1.48% |14824 | bernard_ab...@hotmail.com 0.99% |1 | 1.08% |10763 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.99% |1 | 1.07% |10707 | sha...@juniper.net 0.99% |1 | 1.02% |10205 | b...@google.com 0.99% |1 | 0.98% | 9840 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.99% |1 | 0.88% | 8797 | barryle...@computer.org 0.99% |1 | 0.84% | 8382 | ncamw...@cisco.com 0.99% |1 | 0.82% | 8183 | ebur...@standardstrack.com 0.99% |1 | 0.78% | 7804 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 0.73% | 7331 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.99% |1 | 0.73% | 7328 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 0.71% | 7106 | b...@nostrum.com 0.99% |1 | 0.70% | 7035 | d...@dcrocker.net 0.99% |1 | 0.70% | 6954 | huubatw...@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 0.66% | 6628 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.99% |1 | 0.62% | 6242 | ch...@ietf.org 0.99% |1 | 0.59% | 5863 | l...@asgard.org 0.99% |1 | 0.53% | 5290 | stpe...@stpeter.im +--++--+ 100.00% | 101 |100.00% | 999556 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 166 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 11 00:53:03 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 11.45% | 19 | 7.53% | 127480 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 7.23% | 12 | 7.18% | 121646 | say...@gmail.com 4.22% |7 | 8.90% | 150674 | jasn...@gmail.com 6.02% | 10 | 4.63% |78379 | jeanj...@comcast.net 0.60% |1 | 7.60% | 128690 | nabil.n.bi...@verizon.com 3.01% |5 | 3.17% |53598 | m...@mnot.net 3.01% |5 | 3.06% |51892 | hsan...@isdg.net 3.01% |5 | 2.22% |37592 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 2.41% |4 | 2.72% |46130 | m...@sap.com 1.81% |3 | 3.04% |51406 | j...@10gen.com 2.41% |4 | 1.71% |29026 | s...@resistor.net 2.41% |4 | 1.38% |23413 | o...@cisco.com 2.41% |4 | 1.35% |22925 | jo...@taugh.com 1.20% |2 | 2.50% |42369 | ted.i...@gmail.com 1.20% |2 | 2.49% |42242 | gregimir...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 2.67% |45175 | neil.2.harri...@bt.com 1.81% |3 | 1.44% |24414 | petit...@acm.org 1.81% |3 | 1.40% |23650 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.81% |3 | 1.37% |23260 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 1.81% |3 | 1.34% |22738 | huubatw...@gmail.com 1.20% |2 | 1.76% |29738 | m...@mpcm.com 1.81% |3 | 1.06% |17893 | glenz...@gmail.com 1.81% |3 | 1.00% |16855 | wor...@ariadne.com 0.60% |1 | 2.16% |36597 | b...@google.com 1.81% |3 | 0.93% |15686 | swm...@swm.pp.se 0.60% |1 | 1.99% |33745 | gregory.mir...@ericsson.com 1.20% |2 | 1.11% |18750 | eng.mahmoude...@yahoo.com 1.20% |2 | 1.10% |18668 | l...@cisco.com 1.20% |2 | 0.96% |16314 | pbr...@anode.ca 1.20% |2 | 0.88% |14906 | john-i...@jck.com 1.20% |2 | 0.80% |13623 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.20% |2 | 0.77% |13020 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.20% |2 | 0.76% |12869 | s...@internet2.edu 1.20% |2 | 0.70% |11872 | rwfra...@acm.org 1.20% |2 | 0.68% |11451 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.20% |2 | 0.66% |11250 | rbar...@bbn.com 1.20% |2 | 0.65% |11078 | m...@sandelman.ca 1.20% |2 | 0.64% |10769 | ra...@psg.com 0.60% |1 | 0.85% |14372 | superu...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.74% |12562 | l...@pi.nu 0.60% |1 | 0.70% |11785 | alh-i...@tndh.net 0.60% |1 | 0.66% |11201 | thegreat...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.62% |10452 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.60% |1 | 0.58% | 9838 | conal.tu...@versi.edu.au 0.60% |1 | 0.57% | 9572 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.60% |1 | 0.53% | 8965 | p...@frobbit.se 0.60% |1 | 0.51% | 8609 | c...@tzi.org 0.60% |1 | 0.48% | 8127 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.47% | 7950 | sha...@juniper.net 0.60% |1 | 0.45% | 7590 | markus.lantha...@gmx.net 0.60% |1 | 0.44% | 7525 | tglas...@earthlink.net 0.60% |1 | 0.44% | 7519 | d...@cridland.net 0.60% |1 | 0.44% | 7418 | j...@juniper.net 0.60% |1 | 0.43% | 7324 | b...@nostrum.com 0.60% |1 | 0.42% | 7099 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.42% | 7041 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.60% |1 | 0.41% | 7007 | to...@isi.edu 0.60% |1 | 0.41% | 6861 | lber...@labn.net 0.60% |1 | 0.37% | 6335 | bcla...@cisco.com 0.60% |1 | 0.37% | 6287 | uyesh...@ifa.hawaii.edu 0.60% |1 | 0.37% | 6267 | bra...@isi.edu 0.60% |1 | 0.37% | 6234 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.34% | 5829 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.34% | 5756 | ch...@ietf.org 0.60% |1 | 0.33% | 5623 | k...@bbn.com 0.60% |1 | 0.31% | 5222 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.60% |1 | 0.30% | 5117 | he...@pobox.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 166 |100.00% | 1693270 | Total
Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
Stewart Bryant stbry...@cisco.com writes: Indeed an interesting additional question. My view is that you MUST NOT use RFC2119 language, unless you MUST use it, for exactly that reason. What is important is on the wire (a term that from experience is very difficult to define) inter-operation, and implementers need to be free to achieve that though any means that suits them. The latter goes without saying. It's one of the obvious assumptions that underlies all IETF protocols. It may not be written down, but its always been an underlying principle. E.g., from RFC 1971: A host maintains a number of data structures and flags related to autoconfiguration. In the following, we present conceptual variables and show how they are used to perform autoconfiguration. The specific variables are used for demonstration purposes only, and an implementation is not required to have them, so long as its external behavior is consistent with that described in this document. Other document (that I've long forgotten) say similar things. That sort of language was put into specific documents specifically because some individuals sometimes would raise the concern that a spec was trying to restrict an implementation. IETF specs have always been about describing external behavior (i.e. what you can see on the wire), and how someone implements internally to produce the required external behavior is none of the IETF's business (and never has been). (Someone earlier on this thread seemed to maybe think the above is not a given, but it really always has been.) Thomas
Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
+1 to Brian and others saying upper case should be used sparingly, and only where it really matters. If even then. The notion (that some have) that MUST means you have to do something to be compliant and that a must (lower case) is optional is just nuts. If the ARP spec were to say, upon receipt of an ARP request, the recipient sends back an ARP response, does the lack of a MUST there mean the response is optional? Surely not. And if we make it only a SHOULD (e.g., to allow rate limiting of responses - a very reasonable thing to do), does lack of MUST now make the feature optional from a compliance/interoperability perspective? The idea that upper case language can be used to identify all the required parts of a specificition from a compliance/conformance/interoperability perspective is just wrong. This has never been the case (and would be exceeding painful to do), though (again) some people seem to think this would be useful and thus like lots of upper case language. Where you want to use MUST is where an implementation might be tempted to take a short cut -- to the detriment of the Internet -- but could do so without actually breaking interoperability. A good example is with retransmissions and exponential backoff. You can implement those incorrectly (or not at all), and still get interoperability. I.e., two machines can talk to each other. Maybe you don't get good intereoperability and maybe not great performance under some conditions, but you can still build an interoperabile implementation. IMO, too many specs seriously overuse/misuse 2119 language, to the detriment of readability, common sense, and reserving the terms to bring attention to those cases where it really is important to highlight an important point that may not be obvious to a casual reader/implementor. Thomas
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 92 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 4 00:53:06 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 8.70% |8 | 14.15% | 126350 | hal...@gmail.com 8.70% |8 | 13.78% | 123045 | jeanj...@comcast.net 7.61% |7 | 4.67% |41668 | d...@dcrocker.net 7.61% |7 | 4.20% |37492 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 5.43% |5 | 4.45% |39710 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 1.09% |1 | 6.54% |58445 | nabil.n.bi...@verizon.com 4.35% |4 | 2.99% |26738 | john-i...@jck.com 2.17% |2 | 3.84% |34288 | ndonn...@isoc-cameroon.org 3.26% |3 | 2.52% |22490 | daedu...@btconnect.com 3.26% |3 | 2.51% |22394 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 3.26% |3 | 2.30% |20536 | s...@resistor.net 2.17% |2 | 2.93% |26167 | jgu...@csc.com 1.09% |1 | 3.36% |29966 | jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com 2.17% |2 | 1.94% |17347 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.17% |2 | 1.84% |16456 | p...@frobbit.se 2.17% |2 | 1.76% |15760 | f...@cisco.com 2.17% |2 | 1.50% |13398 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 2.17% |2 | 1.48% |13218 | st...@shinkuro.com 2.17% |2 | 1.13% |10083 | ra...@psg.com 2.17% |2 | 1.09% | 9759 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.09% |1 | 2.15% |19202 | jmamo...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.89% |16888 | dvb...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.34% |11969 | alh-i...@tndh.net 1.09% |1 | 1.08% | 9668 | rbon...@juniper.net 1.09% |1 | 1.06% | 9454 | j...@nlnetlabs.nl 1.09% |1 | 0.96% | 8605 | p...@redbarn.org 1.09% |1 | 0.90% | 8008 | kwier...@cisco.com 1.09% |1 | 0.85% | 7587 | war...@kumari.net 1.09% |1 | 0.79% | 7029 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.09% |1 | 0.78% | 6983 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.09% |1 | 0.77% | 6839 | ves...@tana.it 1.09% |1 | 0.74% | 6601 | ch...@ietf.org 1.09% |1 | 0.68% | 6031 | d3e...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 0.67% | 6019 | wor...@alum.mit.edu 1.09% |1 | 0.67% | 6009 | b...@nostrum.com 1.09% |1 | 0.66% | 5916 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.09% |1 | 0.65% | 5790 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 0.65% | 5786 | jo...@taugh.com 1.09% |1 | 0.65% | 5772 | li...@cs.ucla.edu 1.09% |1 | 0.64% | 5718 | jason_living...@cable.comcast.com 1.09% |1 | 0.63% | 5652 | gjs...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 0.62% | 5565 | d...@xpasc.com 1.09% |1 | 0.61% | 5469 | s...@cs.columbia.edu 1.09% |1 | 0.59% | 5240 | m...@sandelman.ca +--++--+ 100.00% | 92 |100.00% | 893110 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 22 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Dec 28 00:53:02 EST 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.55% |1 | 21.75% |44263 | magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com 13.64% |3 | 11.67% |23748 | b...@nostrum.com 9.09% |2 | 9.32% |18965 | rbon...@juniper.net 9.09% |2 | 6.87% |13988 | ted.le...@nominum.com 9.09% |2 | 6.43% |13095 | s...@resistor.net 9.09% |2 | 6.11% |12429 | pe...@akayla.com 4.55% |1 | 5.14% |10470 | ramakrishna...@infosys.com 4.55% |1 | 4.94% |10047 | bharat_jo...@infosys.com 4.55% |1 | 4.31% | 8766 | hkap...@acmepacket.com 4.55% |1 | 4.28% | 8707 | nar...@us.ibm.com 4.55% |1 | 4.05% | 8249 | v...@bell-labs.com 4.55% |1 | 3.82% | 7773 | gsalg...@cisco.com 4.55% |1 | 3.14% | 6391 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 4.55% |1 | 2.98% | 6057 | john-i...@jck.com 4.55% |1 | 2.90% | 5909 | ra...@psg.com 4.55% |1 | 2.31% | 4695 | i...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 22 |100.00% | 203552 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 103 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Dec 21 00:53:03 EST 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.77% |8 | 13.01% | 141088 | jasn...@gmail.com 11.65% | 12 | 7.43% |80612 | m...@mnot.net 3.88% |4 | 8.67% |94070 | zhou.suj...@zte.com.cn 6.80% |7 | 4.36% |47268 | david.bies...@sas.com 2.91% |3 | 6.78% |73482 | cmortim...@salesforce.com 4.85% |5 | 4.70% |50929 | say...@gmail.com 4.85% |5 | 3.59% |38923 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 3.88% |4 | 3.16% |34275 | n...@inex.ie 3.88% |4 | 2.61% |28356 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 3.88% |4 | 2.35% |25496 | john-i...@jck.com 2.91% |3 | 2.76% |29932 | markus.lantha...@gmx.net 1.94% |2 | 3.60% |39070 | m...@mpcm.com 2.91% |3 | 1.74% |18897 | b...@nostrum.com 1.94% |2 | 2.47% |26797 | ron.even@gmail.com 1.94% |2 | 2.22% |24098 | j...@joelhalpern.com 1.94% |2 | 2.02% |21882 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.97% |1 | 2.59% |28048 | ana...@nttmcl.com 0.97% |1 | 2.40% |25980 | sakim...@gmail.com 1.94% |2 | 1.29% |13980 | mo...@network-heretics.com 1.94% |2 | 1.23% |13352 | barryle...@computer.org 1.94% |2 | 1.21% |13117 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.97% |1 | 2.02% |21900 | denis.pin...@bull.net 1.94% |2 | 0.94% |10208 | ra...@psg.com 0.97% |1 | 1.56% |16928 | wor...@ariadne.com 0.97% |1 | 1.15% |12483 | william.atw...@concordia.ca 0.97% |1 | 0.99% |10729 | rbon...@juniper.net 0.97% |1 | 0.91% | 9894 | droma...@avaya.com 0.97% |1 | 0.87% | 9429 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.97% |1 | 0.85% | 9190 | g...@apnic.net 0.97% |1 | 0.84% | 9055 | magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com 0.97% |1 | 0.80% | 8711 | pbr...@anode.ca 0.97% |1 | 0.77% | 8393 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.97% |1 | 0.73% | 7887 | mcqui...@pobox.com 0.97% |1 | 0.73% | 7869 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.97% |1 | 0.71% | 7736 | mjethanand...@gmail.com 0.97% |1 | 0.71% | 7690 | eosterw...@verisign.com 0.97% |1 | 0.69% | 7516 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.97% |1 | 0.69% | 7459 | james.h.man...@team.telstra.com 0.97% |1 | 0.60% | 6503 | ves...@tana.it 0.97% |1 | 0.58% | 6236 | martin.thom...@gmail.com 0.97% |1 | 0.55% | 5929 | j...@jck.com 0.97% |1 | 0.54% | 5874 | co...@isoc.org 0.97% |1 | 0.54% | 5827 | wind...@skyhighway.com 0.97% |1 | 0.53% | 5775 | ch...@ietf.org 0.97% |1 | 0.51% | 5528 | amor...@amsl.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 103 |100.00% | 1084401 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 58 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Dec 14 00:53:02 EST 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 12.07% |7 | 16.06% |71764 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 8.62% |5 | 9.19% |41081 | marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca 8.62% |5 | 5.56% |24846 | ra...@psg.com 6.90% |4 | 6.54% |29227 | ra...@qti.qualcomm.com 6.90% |4 | 6.39% |28536 | barryle...@computer.org 6.90% |4 | 5.66% |25288 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 6.90% |4 | 5.34% |23854 | m...@mnot.net 5.17% |3 | 5.76% |25720 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 5.17% |3 | 4.38% |19578 | john-i...@jck.com 3.45% |2 | 4.92% |21968 | l...@pi.nu 3.45% |2 | 2.85% |12716 | pier-...@sarkass.com 1.72% |1 | 3.15% |14080 | pbr...@anode.ca 1.72% |1 | 2.91% |12981 | zhou.suj...@zte.com.cn 1.72% |1 | 2.79% |12461 | jasn...@gmail.com 1.72% |1 | 2.22% | 9929 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.72% |1 | 2.15% | 9615 | pars.mu...@gmail.com 1.72% |1 | 1.64% | 7335 | to...@isi.edu 1.72% |1 | 1.63% | 7290 | ted.i...@gmail.com 1.72% |1 | 1.58% | 7074 | pe...@akayla.com 1.72% |1 | 1.58% | 7064 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 1.72% |1 | 1.51% | 6762 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.72% |1 | 1.44% | 6451 | rwfra...@gmail.com 1.72% |1 | 1.23% | 5511 | ves...@tana.it 1.72% |1 | 1.23% | 5486 | n...@inex.ie 1.72% |1 | 1.15% | 5137 | wind...@skyhighway.com 1.72% |1 | 1.13% | 5054 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 58 |100.00% | 446808 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 215 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Dec 7 00:53:03 EST 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 10.23% | 22 | 10.49% | 165129 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 8.37% | 18 | 9.22% | 145124 | mo...@network-heretics.com 6.98% | 15 | 6.18% |97223 | d...@dcrocker.net 6.05% | 13 | 5.34% |84038 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 4.19% |9 | 4.07% |63986 | s...@resistor.net 4.19% |9 | 4.05% |63701 | barryle...@computer.org 3.72% |8 | 3.39% |53326 | john-i...@jck.com 3.26% |7 | 3.23% |50885 | joe...@bogus.com 3.26% |7 | 3.21% |50444 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.79% |6 | 3.31% |52081 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.26% |7 | 2.39% |37589 | ra...@psg.com 2.79% |6 | 2.40% |37817 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 2.33% |5 | 2.52% |39591 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 0.93% |2 | 2.67% |42008 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.86% |4 | 1.65% |25890 | hannes.tschofe...@nsn.com 1.40% |3 | 1.50% |23572 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.40% |3 | 1.38% |21751 | ra...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.93% |2 | 1.84% |28912 | ted.i...@gmail.com 1.40% |3 | 1.24% |19571 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.93% |2 | 1.61% |25360 | agma...@gmail.com 0.93% |2 | 1.44% |22644 | magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com 1.40% |3 | 0.97% |15258 | wjh...@hardakers.net 0.93% |2 | 1.10% |17355 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.93% |2 | 1.06% |16637 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.93% |2 | 0.99% |15583 | f...@cisco.com 0.93% |2 | 0.96% |15115 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.93% |2 | 0.90% |14204 | s...@cs.columbia.edu 0.93% |2 | 0.86% |13558 | petit...@acm.org 0.93% |2 | 0.81% |12759 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.93% |2 | 0.80% |12623 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.93% |2 | 0.79% |12409 | due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp 0.93% |2 | 0.74% |11719 | pars.mu...@gmail.com 0.93% |2 | 0.74% |11585 | l...@pi.nu 0.93% |2 | 0.72% |11321 | jo...@taugh.com 0.93% |2 | 0.70% |11081 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.93% |2 | 0.70% |11057 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.47% |1 | 1.02% |16100 | mjethanand...@gmail.com 0.47% |1 | 0.90% |14229 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.47% |1 | 0.66% |10344 | t...@att.com 0.47% |1 | 0.60% | 9448 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.47% |1 | 0.56% | 8754 | b...@nostrum.com 0.47% |1 | 0.55% | 8717 | rbon...@juniper.net 0.47% |1 | 0.46% | 7287 | g...@apnic.net 0.47% |1 | 0.46% | 7168 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.47% |1 | 0.43% | 6819 | dave.cridl...@isode.com 0.47% |1 | 0.43% | 6761 | da...@tcb.net 0.47% |1 | 0.43% | 6754 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.47% |1 | 0.41% | 6510 | chuck.le...@oracle.com 0.47% |1 | 0.41% | 6475 | l...@asgard.org 0.47% |1 | 0.40% | 6355 | dcroc...@bbiw.net 0.47% |1 | 0.40% | 6307 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.47% |1 | 0.40% | 6293 | suresh.krish...@ericsson.com 0.47% |1 | 0.39% | 6191 | marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca 0.47% |1 | 0.39% | 6102 | berti...@bwijnen.net 0.47% |1 | 0.39% | 6071 | aser...@lacnic.net 0.47% |1 | 0.38% | 6056 | nomcom-ch...@ietf.org 0.47% |1 | 0.38% | 6054 | c...@tzi.org 0.47% |1 | 0.38% | 5984 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.47% |1 | 0.38% | 5917 | ferna...@gont.com.ar 0.47% |1 | 0.38% | 5902 | martin.thom...@gmail.com 0.47% |1 | 0.37% | 5849 | julian.resc...@gmx.de 0.47% |1 | 0.36% | 5588 | s...@internet2.edu 0.47% |1 | 0.35% | 5535 | rbar...@bbn.com 0.47% |1 | 0.34% | 5356 | d...@xpasc.com 0.47% |1 | 0.34% | 5335 | ves...@tana.it 0.47% |1 | 0.34% | 5317 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.47% |1 | 0.34% | 5274 | pe...@akayla.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 215 |100.00% | 1573758 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 108 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Nov 30 00:53:02 EST 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.41% |8 | 7.25% |2 | s...@resistor.net 6.48% |7 | 6.37% |48769 | g...@apnic.net 7.41% |8 | 5.35% |40943 | ra...@psg.com 4.63% |5 | 4.54% |34786 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 4.63% |5 | 3.97% |30427 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.70% |4 | 3.88% |29727 | barryle...@computer.org 3.70% |4 | 3.26% |25003 | john-i...@jck.com 2.78% |3 | 3.55% |27176 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.78% |3 | 3.53% |27059 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 2.78% |3 | 3.06% |23408 | f...@isoc.org 2.78% |3 | 2.51% |19203 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.85% |2 | 2.30% |17641 | daedu...@btconnect.com 1.85% |2 | 1.98% |15197 | l...@cisco.com 1.85% |2 | 1.84% |14107 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.85% |2 | 1.83% |14033 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.85% |2 | 1.66% |12749 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.85% |2 | 1.64% |12543 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.85% |2 | 1.45% |11130 | listse...@me.com 1.85% |2 | 1.43% |10960 | p...@nohats.ca 0.93% |1 | 1.76% |13490 | mjethanand...@gmail.com 0.93% |1 | 1.73% |13226 | d...@1-4-5.net 0.93% |1 | 1.60% |12243 | bens...@queuefull.net 0.93% |1 | 1.47% |11292 | ed.le...@neustar.biz 0.93% |1 | 1.30% | 9924 | superu...@gmail.com 0.93% |1 | 1.29% | 9864 | agma...@gmail.com 0.93% |1 | 1.23% | 9425 | tramm...@tik.ee.ethz.ch 0.93% |1 | 1.17% | 8948 | o...@ogud.com 0.93% |1 | 1.11% | 8497 | wor...@ariadne.com 0.93% |1 | 1.08% | 8238 | j...@jlc.net 0.93% |1 | 1.05% | 8076 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.93% |1 | 1.04% | 7935 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.93% |1 | 1.02% | 7782 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.93% |1 | 1.02% | 7775 | g...@gigix.net 0.93% |1 | 0.99% | 7607 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 0.93% |1 | 0.99% | 7593 | joe...@bogus.com 0.93% |1 | 0.96% | 7332 | mo...@network-heretics.com 0.93% |1 | 0.94% | 7183 | marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca 0.93% |1 | 0.92% | 7039 | ves...@tana.it 0.93% |1 | 0.92% | 7008 | l...@asgard.org 0.93% |1 | 0.91% | 6932 | tglas...@earthlink.net 0.93% |1 | 0.90% | 6863 | andrew.hut...@siemens-enterprise.com 0.93% |1 | 0.89% | 6813 | s...@internet2.edu 0.93% |1 | 0.87% | 6674 | d...@xpasc.com 0.93% |1 | 0.86% | 6605 | to...@isi.edu 0.93% |1 | 0.85% | 6548 | droma...@avaya.com 0.93% |1 | 0.85% | 6509 | cb.li...@gmail.com 0.93% |1 | 0.84% | 6442 | br...@innovationslab.net 0.93% |1 | 0.84% | 6442 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.93% |1 | 0.80% | 6135 | jo...@taugh.com 0.93% |1 | 0.78% | 5992 | morrowc.li...@gmail.com 0.93% |1 | 0.77% | 5880 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 0.93% |1 | 0.76% | 5843 | d...@virtualized.org 0.93% |1 | 0.71% | 5455 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.93% |1 | 0.71% | 5439 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 0.93% |1 | 0.70% | 5346 | ferna...@gont.com.ar 0.93% |1 | 0.66% | 5055 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.93% |1 | 0.66% | 5041 | r...@gsp.org 0.93% |1 | 0.65% | 4982 | wjh...@hardakers.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 108 |100.00% | 765886 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 74 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Nov 23 00:53:07 EST 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 16.22% | 12 | 15.79% |97125 | farina...@gmail.com 8.11% |6 | 5.06% |31138 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 5.41% |4 | 4.73% |29113 | san...@steffann.nl 4.05% |3 | 5.26% |32339 | g...@apnic.net 4.05% |3 | 4.52% |27785 | eric.g...@ericsson.com 4.05% |3 | 4.26% |26220 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 4.05% |3 | 3.28% |20191 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 4.05% |3 | 3.21% |19744 | s...@resistor.net 2.70% |2 | 3.65% |22475 | roberta.magli...@telecomitalia.it 2.70% |2 | 3.54% |21765 | ggm+i...@apnic.net 2.70% |2 | 3.25% |20015 | cb.li...@gmail.com 2.70% |2 | 3.19% |19599 | leaf.yeh@gmail.com 2.70% |2 | 3.14% |19322 | k...@munnari.oz.au 2.70% |2 | 2.98% |18321 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.70% |2 | 2.55% |15671 | j...@joelhalpern.com 2.70% |2 | 2.45% |15068 | mlepinski.i...@gmail.com 2.70% |2 | 2.23% |13732 | rog...@gmail.com 1.35% |1 | 3.52% |21664 | heinerhum...@aol.com 2.70% |2 | 1.97% |12129 | pvi...@vinciconsulting.com 2.70% |2 | 1.97% |12103 | aser...@lacnic.net 1.35% |1 | 3.14% |19348 | mjethanand...@gmail.com 1.35% |1 | 2.31% |14186 | jiangsh...@huawei.com 1.35% |1 | 1.51% | 9282 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.35% |1 | 1.48% | 9075 | jmh.dir...@joelhalpern.com 1.35% |1 | 1.46% | 8971 | b...@nostrum.com 1.35% |1 | 1.40% | 8596 | hal...@gmail.com 1.35% |1 | 1.30% | 8005 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 1.35% |1 | 1.17% | 7169 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 1.35% |1 | 1.11% | 6813 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 1.35% |1 | 1.06% | 6519 | i...@ietf.org 1.35% |1 | 0.91% | 5590 | suresh.krish...@ericsson.com 1.35% |1 | 0.89% | 5482 | ch...@ietf.org 1.35% |1 | 0.88% | 5407 | jo...@iecc.com 1.35% |1 | 0.85% | 5240 | nomcom-ch...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 74 |100.00% | 615202 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 148 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Nov 16 00:53:02 EST 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.76% | 10 | 5.99% |68144 | san...@steffann.nl 6.08% |9 | 5.97% |67932 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 5.41% |8 | 4.72% |53729 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 4.73% |7 | 4.75% |54068 | s...@resistor.net 4.73% |7 | 4.44% |50498 | aser...@lacnic.net 4.73% |7 | 4.32% |49148 | d...@dcrocker.net 4.73% |7 | 4.21% |47897 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 7.67% |87301 | f...@cisco.com 3.38% |5 | 3.88% |44170 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 4.05% |6 | 3.05% |34682 | jo...@taugh.com 3.38% |5 | 3.13% |35659 | g...@gigix.net 2.70% |4 | 3.45% |39268 | daedu...@btconnect.com 2.70% |4 | 2.93% |33343 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.03% |3 | 2.19% |24972 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.03% |3 | 2.02% |22964 | b...@nostrum.com 2.03% |3 | 1.92% |21896 | joe...@bogus.com 2.03% |3 | 1.85% |21067 | c...@tzi.org 2.03% |3 | 1.83% |20850 | tglas...@earthlink.net 2.03% |3 | 1.68% |19071 | berti...@bwijnen.net 1.35% |2 | 1.68% |19087 | framefri...@gmail.com 1.35% |2 | 1.68% |19083 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 1.35% |2 | 1.22% |13919 | ggm+i...@apnic.net 1.35% |2 | 1.21% |13808 | vinay...@gmail.com 1.35% |2 | 1.14% |13021 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.35% |2 | 1.13% |12811 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.35% |2 | 1.04% |11795 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 1.35% |2 | 1.02% |11623 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.35% |2 | 1.01% |11479 | swm...@swm.pp.se 1.35% |2 | 0.97% |11069 | n...@inex.ie 1.35% |2 | 0.96% |10973 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.35% |2 | 0.88% |10021 | ra...@psg.com 0.68% |1 | 1.00% |11430 | s...@internet2.edu 0.68% |1 | 0.90% |10225 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.68% |1 | 0.83% | 9502 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.68% |1 | 0.75% | 8559 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.68% |1 | 0.74% | 8480 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.72% | 8251 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.70% | 7989 | i...@ietf.org 0.68% |1 | 0.70% | 7931 | t...@att.com 0.68% |1 | 0.66% | 7466 | gmail.sant9...@winserver.com 0.68% |1 | 0.65% | 7440 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 0.68% |1 | 0.65% | 7413 | petit...@acm.org 0.68% |1 | 0.60% | 6874 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.59% | 6754 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.68% |1 | 0.58% | 6598 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.68% |1 | 0.55% | 6307 | rog...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.54% | 6183 | azurem...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.53% | 6013 | d...@xpasc.com 0.68% |1 | 0.52% | 5943 | p...@frobbit.se 0.68% |1 | 0.51% | 5856 | l...@cisco.com 0.68% |1 | 0.51% | 5830 | g...@apnic.net 0.68% |1 | 0.50% | 5725 | r...@gsp.org 0.68% |1 | 0.50% | 5673 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.68% |1 | 0.50% | 5646 | pvi...@vinciconsulting.com 0.68% |1 | 0.47% | 5317 | dcroc...@bbiw.net 0.68% |1 | 0.44% | 4960 | bortzme...@nic.fr 0.68% |1 | 0.41% | 4661 | i...@meetecho.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 148 |100.00% | 1138374 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 144 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Nov 9 00:53:03 EST 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.86% |7 | 7.43% |77532 | tglas...@earthlink.net 5.56% |8 | 4.95% |51703 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 4.17% |6 | 5.03% |52526 | st...@stewe.org 4.86% |7 | 4.32% |45115 | d...@dcrocker.net 4.17% |6 | 4.07% |42507 | s...@resistor.net 4.17% |6 | 3.77% |39303 | hous...@vigilsec.com 3.47% |5 | 3.39% |35351 | ted.i...@gmail.com 2.78% |4 | 2.33% |24271 | pait...@cisco.com 2.08% |3 | 2.99% |31167 | daedu...@btconnect.com 2.78% |4 | 2.24% |23397 | jo...@taugh.com 2.08% |3 | 2.29% |23869 | turchanyi.g...@gmail.com 2.08% |3 | 1.84% |19204 | john-i...@jck.com 2.08% |3 | 1.76% |18336 | s...@sobco.com 1.39% |2 | 2.32% |24228 | l...@netapp.com 2.08% |3 | 1.54% |16056 | ch...@ietf.org 2.08% |3 | 1.38% |14434 | ra...@psg.com 1.39% |2 | 1.85% |19287 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.39% |2 | 1.77% |18495 | g...@gtwassociates.com 1.39% |2 | 1.67% |17470 | agma...@gmail.com 1.39% |2 | 1.56% |16259 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.39% |2 | 1.51% |15803 | f...@cisco.com 1.39% |2 | 1.47% |15323 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.39% |2 | 1.43% |14919 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.39% |2 | 1.37% |14272 | o...@ogud.com 1.39% |2 | 1.35% |14123 | jason_living...@cable.comcast.com 1.39% |2 | 1.33% |13900 | j...@jlc.net 1.39% |2 | 1.33% |13874 | joe...@bogus.com 1.39% |2 | 1.23% |12886 | listse...@me.com 1.39% |2 | 1.18% |12285 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 1.39% |2 | 1.08% |11249 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 1.39% |2 | 0.97% |10167 | p...@cypherpunks.ca 0.69% |1 | 1.10% |11497 | afar...@juniper.net 0.69% |1 | 1.10% |11440 | l...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.69% |1 | 1.01% |10488 | vincent.r...@inria.fr 0.69% |1 | 0.94% | 9802 | cpign...@cisco.com 0.69% |1 | 0.93% | 9693 | mach.c...@huawei.com 0.69% |1 | 0.88% | 9215 | ebur...@standardstrack.com 0.69% |1 | 0.83% | 8634 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.69% |1 | 0.80% | 8343 | mstjo...@comcast.net 0.69% |1 | 0.76% | 7927 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 0.69% |1 | 0.76% | 7923 | st.am...@isoc.org 0.69% |1 | 0.75% | 7848 | lro...@rosenlaw.com 0.69% |1 | 0.71% | 7386 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.69% |1 | 0.70% | 7266 | sha...@juniper.net 0.69% |1 | 0.69% | 7234 | jordi.pa...@consulintel.es 0.69% |1 | 0.68% | 7094 | berti...@bwijnen.net 0.69% |1 | 0.68% | 7065 | tobias.gond...@gondrom.org 0.69% |1 | 0.65% | 6829 | to...@isi.edu 0.69% |1 | 0.64% | 6706 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.69% |1 | 0.63% | 6623 | david.ru...@microsoft.com 0.69% |1 | 0.63% | 6557 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 0.69% |1 | 0.63% | 6529 | j...@jck.com 0.69% |1 | 0.62% | 6502 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.69% |1 | 0.62% | 6489 | barryle...@computer.org 0.69% |1 | 0.60% | 6305 | henk.uijterw...@gmail.com 0.69% |1 | 0.58% | 6068 | war...@kumari.net 0.69% |1 | 0.58% | 6057 | d...@xpasc.com 0.69% |1 | 0.57% | 5997 | verywarmc...@gmail.com 0.69% |1 | 0.57% | 5923 | yiu_...@cable.comcast.com 0.69% |1 | 0.55% | 5789 | ves...@tana.it 0.69% |1 | 0.55% | 5710 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.69% |1 | 0.55% | 5701 | l...@cisco.com 0.69% |1 | 0.53% | 5568 | s...@cs.columbia.edu 0.69% |1 | 0.53% | 5483 | joe...@gmail.com 0.69% |1 | 0.51% | 5366 | john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com 0.69% |1 | 0.51% | 5326 | bresci...@verizon.net 0.69% |1 | 0.50% | 5166 | finlay...@live555.com 0.69% |1 | 0.49% | 5141 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.69% |1 | 0.48% | 4972 | aal...@trstech.net 0.69% |1 | 0.47% | 4933 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 0.69% |1 | 0.47% | 4889 | simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca 0.69% |1 | 0.45% | 4702 | wjh...@hardakers.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 144 |100.00% | 1043497 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 77 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Nov 2 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.49% |5 | 6.78% |37980 | l...@cisco.com 6.49% |5 | 6.33% |35466 | mstjo...@comcast.net 5.19% |4 | 5.17% |28952 | john-i...@jck.com 5.19% |4 | 5.15% |28826 | tglas...@earthlink.net 2.60% |2 | 6.58% |36864 | o...@nlnetlabs.nl 3.90% |3 | 3.79% |21208 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 3.90% |3 | 3.57% |20013 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.90% |3 | 2.98% |16665 | war...@kumari.net 2.60% |2 | 3.53% |19752 | rbon...@juniper.net 2.60% |2 | 2.98% |16692 | eburge...@standardstrack.com 2.60% |2 | 2.82% |15763 | rja.li...@gmail.com 2.60% |2 | 2.64% |14784 | margaret...@gmail.com 2.60% |2 | 2.58% |14460 | turchanyi.g...@gmail.com 2.60% |2 | 2.35% |13176 | hous...@vigilsec.com 2.60% |2 | 2.33% |13021 | do...@dougbarton.us 2.60% |2 | 2.27% |12730 | o...@ogud.com 2.60% |2 | 2.05% |11504 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 2.60% |2 | 2.00% |11208 | joe...@bogus.com 1.30% |1 | 2.08% |11654 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.30% |1 | 2.04% |11416 | daedu...@btconnect.com 1.30% |1 | 1.72% | 9614 | d...@cridland.net 1.30% |1 | 1.71% | 9591 | jo...@taugh.com 1.30% |1 | 1.64% | 9210 | edj@gmail.com 1.30% |1 | 1.50% | 8425 | d3e...@gmail.com 1.30% |1 | 1.44% | 8074 | rwfra...@gmail.com 1.30% |1 | 1.42% | 7977 | s...@resistor.net 1.30% |1 | 1.40% | 7830 | f...@cisco.com 1.30% |1 | 1.33% | 7427 | ted.i...@gmail.com 1.30% |1 | 1.28% | 7164 | b...@secret-wg.org 1.30% |1 | 1.10% | 6173 | s...@sobco.com 1.30% |1 | 1.04% | 5815 | jmp...@cisco.com 1.30% |1 | 1.04% | 5799 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 1.30% |1 | 1.02% | 5732 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.30% |1 | 1.01% | 5682 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.30% |1 | 1.01% | 5634 | d...@xpasc.com 1.30% |1 | 1.01% | 5633 | julian.resc...@gmx.de 1.30% |1 | 1.01% | 5628 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.30% |1 | 1.00% | 5617 | f...@isoc.org 1.30% |1 | 1.00% | 5615 | berti...@bwijnen.net 1.30% |1 | 0.96% | 5393 | nomcom-ch...@ietf.org 1.30% |1 | 0.95% | 5322 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.30% |1 | 0.94% | 5277 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 1.30% |1 | 0.93% | 5220 | bortzme...@nic.fr 1.30% |1 | 0.89% | 4997 | j...@nlnetlabs.nl 1.30% |1 | 0.84% | 4716 | acoo...@cdt.org 1.30% |1 | 0.76% | 4245 | ra...@psg.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 77 |100.00% | 559944 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 253 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Oct 26 00:53:04 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.51% | 19 | 8.44% | 159158 | i...@hixie.ch 5.93% | 15 | 4.78% |90220 | do...@dougbarton.us 4.74% | 12 | 3.50% |66074 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 2.77% |7 | 3.00% |56606 | barryle...@computer.org 2.77% |7 | 2.73% |51552 | mstjo...@comcast.net 2.37% |6 | 2.25% |42372 | m...@mnot.net 1.58% |4 | 2.82% |53162 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.37% |6 | 2.02% |38032 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.37% |6 | 1.92% |36298 | d...@xpasc.com 1.98% |5 | 1.75% |33089 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.58% |4 | 1.86% |35090 | listse...@me.com 1.19% |3 | 2.00% |37803 | tb...@textuality.com 1.58% |4 | 1.55% |29152 | john-i...@jck.com 0.40% |1 | 2.70% |50895 | denis.pin...@bull.net 1.58% |4 | 1.45% |27421 | jan.algermis...@nordsc.com 1.58% |4 | 1.42% |26717 | julian.resc...@gmx.de 1.58% |4 | 1.40% |26492 | s...@resistor.net 1.58% |4 | 1.38% |26027 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.19% |3 | 1.72% |32457 | pe...@akayla.com 1.58% |4 | 1.30% |24477 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.58% |4 | 1.24% |23444 | c...@tzi.org 1.58% |4 | 1.24% |23306 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 1.19% |3 | 1.51% |28520 | kosmo...@gmail.com 1.19% |3 | 1.21% |22840 | ted.i...@gmail.com 1.19% |3 | 1.10% |20700 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.19% |3 | 1.09% |20492 | rpellet...@isoc.org 1.19% |3 | 1.02% |19250 | alh-i...@tndh.net 1.19% |3 | 1.00% |18875 | ty...@mit.edu 1.19% |3 | 1.00% |18783 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.79% |2 | 1.37% |25773 | jasn...@gmail.com 1.19% |3 | 0.95% |17844 | jo...@taugh.com 1.19% |3 | 0.94% |17821 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.19% |3 | 0.94% |17732 | s...@internet2.edu 1.19% |3 | 0.90% |16979 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 0.79% |2 | 1.29% |24258 | pe-ji...@kddi.com 1.19% |3 | 0.85% |16052 | bortzme...@nic.fr 1.19% |3 | 0.76% |14351 | ra...@psg.com 0.79% |2 | 1.10% |20805 | lber...@labn.net 0.79% |2 | 1.07% |20201 | chuck.le...@oracle.com 0.79% |2 | 0.96% |18035 | l...@cisco.com 0.79% |2 | 0.94% |17824 | field...@gbiv.com 0.79% |2 | 0.93% |17555 | rumbi...@gmail.com 0.79% |2 | 0.82% |15513 | turchanyi.g...@gmail.com 0.79% |2 | 0.81% |15311 | ann...@annevk.nl 0.79% |2 | 0.81% |15234 | james.h.man...@team.telstra.com 0.79% |2 | 0.76% |14297 | b...@nostrum.com 0.79% |2 | 0.73% |13857 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.79% |2 | 0.70% |13253 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.79% |2 | 0.70% |13251 | joe...@bogus.com 0.79% |2 | 0.69% |13050 | iesg-secret...@ietf.org 0.79% |2 | 0.67% |12595 | j...@jlc.net 0.79% |2 | 0.65% |12352 | m...@sap.com 0.79% |2 | 0.62% |11743 | co...@mercury.ccil.org 0.79% |2 | 0.62% |11711 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.79% |2 | 0.62% |11675 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.79% |2 | 0.59% |11179 | i...@ietf.org 0.40% |1 | 0.99% |18607 | mam...@yahoo.com 0.40% |1 | 0.67% |12620 | tglas...@earthlink.net 0.40% |1 | 0.62% |11734 | l...@netapp.com 0.40% |1 | 0.59% |11043 | grm...@gmail.com 0.40% |1 | 0.56% |10613 | tina.tsou.zout...@huawei.com 0.40% |1 | 0.56% |10605 | clau...@weborganic.com 0.40% |1 | 0.56% |10501 | ra...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.40% |1 | 0.49% | 9188 | d...@1-4-5.net 0.40% |1 | 0.48% | 9084 | bens...@queuefull.net 0.40% |1 | 0.45% | 8524 | rbon...@juniper.net 0.40% |1 | 0.44% | 8330 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.40% |1 | 0.43% | 8051 | edj@gmail.com 0.40% |1 | 0.41% | 7665 | kwier...@cisco.com 0.40% |1 | 0.40% | 7561 | hal...@gmail.com 0.40% |1 | 0.39% | 7409 | n...@arcanedomain.com 0.40% |1 | 0.39% | 7381 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.40% |1 | 0.38% | 7257 | ma...@isc.org 0.40% |1 | 0.38% | 7222 | margaret...@gmail.com 0.40% |1 | 0.38% | 7085 | huit...@microsoft.com 0.40% |1 | 0.35% | 6584 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.40% |1 | 0.35% | 6581 | henk.uijterw...@gmail.com 0.40% |1 | 0.35% | 6546 | tobias.gond...@gondrom.org 0.40% |1 | 0.34% | 6481 | h...@cs.columbia.edu 0.40% |1 | 0.34% | 6346 | g...@algebras.org 0.40% |1 | 0.34% | 6345 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.40% |1 | 0.34% | 6344 | s...@harvard.edu 0.40% |1 | 0.33% | 6245 | rwfra...@gmail.com 0.40% |1 | 0.32% | 6097 | mc...@petoni.org 0.40% |1 | 0.32% | 6067 |
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 72 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Oct 19 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 9.72% |7 | 7.32% |40543 | d...@dcrocker.net 8.33% |6 | 7.39% |40922 | john-i...@jck.com 6.94% |5 | 5.52% |30553 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 2.78% |2 | 7.82% |43276 | yiu_...@cable.comcast.com 4.17% |3 | 6.16% |34126 | david.bl...@emc.com 2.78% |2 | 6.69% |37019 | ron.even@gmail.com 4.17% |3 | 3.87% |21402 | ch...@ietf.org 4.17% |3 | 2.95% |16322 | ra...@psg.com 2.78% |2 | 3.42% |18916 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 2.78% |2 | 3.15% |17451 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 2.78% |2 | 2.43% |13434 | barryle...@computer.org 2.78% |2 | 2.36% |13046 | i...@hixie.ch 2.78% |2 | 2.28% |12597 | dcroc...@bbiw.net 2.78% |2 | 2.21% |12228 | s...@resistor.net 2.78% |2 | 2.11% |11706 | war...@kumari.net 2.78% |2 | 2.11% |11693 | joe...@bogus.com 2.78% |2 | 2.10% |11622 | jo...@taugh.com 2.78% |2 | 2.08% |11501 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.78% |2 | 2.02% |11180 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.39% |1 | 3.33% |18428 | roberta.magli...@telecomitalia.it 1.39% |1 | 1.99% |11017 | tglas...@earthlink.net 1.39% |1 | 1.46% | 8088 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.39% |1 | 1.45% | 8017 | l...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.39% |1 | 1.41% | 7793 | contrerasle...@att.net 1.39% |1 | 1.38% | 7645 | g...@gtwassociates.com 1.39% |1 | 1.36% | 7531 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.39% |1 | 1.30% | 7222 | mcqui...@pobox.com 1.39% |1 | 1.24% | 6870 | f...@cisco.com 1.39% |1 | 1.23% | 6799 | crae...@isoc.org 1.39% |1 | 1.20% | 6662 | i...@meetecho.com 1.39% |1 | 1.20% | 6643 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.39% |1 | 1.18% | 6535 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.39% |1 | 1.14% | 6306 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.39% |1 | 1.08% | 5954 | n...@arcanedomain.com 1.39% |1 | 1.06% | 5873 | ra...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.39% |1 | 1.06% | 5865 | mahmutbul...@gmail.com 1.39% |1 | 1.04% | 5771 | o...@ogud.com 1.39% |1 | 0.91% | 5034 | har...@alvestrand.no +--++--+ 100.00% | 72 |100.00% | 553590 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 52 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Oct 12 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 9.62% |5 | 8.32% |35545 | tglas...@earthlink.net 5.77% |3 | 8.83% |37719 | jasn...@gmail.com 5.77% |3 | 5.16% |22062 | martin.thom...@gmail.com 5.77% |3 | 4.76% |20356 | j...@bondis.org 5.77% |3 | 4.48% |19133 | s...@resistor.net 3.85% |2 | 6.06% |25880 | david.bl...@emc.com 3.85% |2 | 3.73% |15931 | canto...@osu.edu 1.92% |1 | 5.57% |23774 | ron.even@gmail.com 3.85% |2 | 3.06% |13083 | si...@josefsson.org 3.85% |2 | 2.74% |11704 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.85% |2 | 2.65% |11320 | jo...@taugh.com 1.92% |1 | 4.57% |19512 | andrew.g.ma...@verizon.com 3.85% |2 | 2.41% |10307 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.92% |1 | 3.28% |14032 | julian.resc...@gmx.de 1.92% |1 | 3.05% |13038 | glenz...@gmail.com 1.92% |1 | 2.80% |11970 | l...@netapp.com 1.92% |1 | 2.51% |10742 | j...@juniper.net 1.92% |1 | 2.17% | 9288 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.92% |1 | 2.15% | 9175 | chesh...@apple.com 1.92% |1 | 1.89% | 8078 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.92% |1 | 1.76% | 7529 | ted.i...@gmail.com 1.92% |1 | 1.75% | 7489 | barryle...@computer.org 1.92% |1 | 1.70% | 7283 | john-i...@jck.com 1.92% |1 | 1.63% | 6953 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.92% |1 | 1.45% | 6185 | ferna...@gont.com.ar 1.92% |1 | 1.39% | 5920 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.92% |1 | 1.33% | 5662 | d...@xpasc.com 1.92% |1 | 1.31% | 5577 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.92% |1 | 1.31% | 5575 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 1.92% |1 | 1.27% | 5423 | hartm...@painless-security.com 1.92% |1 | 1.24% | 5288 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 1.92% |1 | 1.24% | 5282 | dcroc...@bbiw.net 1.92% |1 | 1.22% | 5218 | ch...@ietf.org 1.92% |1 | 1.21% | 5169 | rbar...@bbn.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 52 |100.00% | 427202 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 27 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Oct 5 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 18.52% |5 | 18.08% |35445 | john-i...@jck.com 14.81% |4 | 14.64% |28710 | ma...@isc.org 11.11% |3 | 10.93% |21421 | s...@resistor.net 7.41% |2 | 9.30% |18237 | o...@ogud.com 7.41% |2 | 7.34% |14395 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 7.41% |2 | 5.35% |10488 | bortzme...@nic.fr 3.70% |1 | 4.79% | 9399 | tglas...@earthlink.net 3.70% |1 | 4.33% | 8495 | j...@jlc.net 3.70% |1 | 4.22% | 8277 | nar...@us.ibm.com 3.70% |1 | 4.22% | 8271 | joe...@bogus.com 3.70% |1 | 4.04% | 7926 | ves...@tana.it 3.70% |1 | 3.76% | 7369 | pe...@akayla.com 3.70% |1 | 3.32% | 6501 | mc...@petoni.org 3.70% |1 | 3.27% | 6411 | rbar...@bbn.com 3.70% |1 | 2.40% | 4701 | malcolm.be...@zte.com.cn +--++--+ 100.00% | 27 |100.00% | 196046 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 96 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 28 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 9.38% |9 | 10.56% |72567 | hous...@vigilsec.com 8.33% |8 | 9.91% |68084 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 8.33% |8 | 9.01% |61930 | tglas...@earthlink.net 6.25% |6 | 6.35% |43627 | john-i...@jck.com 6.25% |6 | 6.29% |43206 | s...@resistor.net 5.21% |5 | 5.01% |34408 | glenz...@gmail.com 5.21% |5 | 4.94% |33934 | d...@dcrocker.net 4.17% |4 | 3.94% |27041 | presn...@qualcomm.com 3.12% |3 | 3.14% |21602 | to...@isi.edu 3.12% |3 | 2.96% |20326 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 3.12% |3 | 2.63% |18078 | barryle...@computer.org 3.12% |3 | 2.63% |18055 | b...@estacado.net 2.08% |2 | 2.09% |14351 | stpe...@stpeter.im 2.08% |2 | 1.84% |12671 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.08% |2 | 1.72% |11832 | henning.schulzri...@fcc.gov 2.08% |2 | 1.69% |11614 | c...@tzi.org 2.08% |2 | 1.62% |11144 | dcroc...@bbiw.net 2.08% |2 | 1.52% |10474 | d...@xpasc.com 2.08% |2 | 1.42% | 9726 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 2.08% |2 | 1.32% | 9088 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.04% |1 | 2.18% |14990 | martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu 1.04% |1 | 2.14% |14728 | haibin.s...@huawei.com 1.04% |1 | 1.88% |12887 | ron.even@gmail.com 1.04% |1 | 1.34% | 9172 | droma...@avaya.com 1.04% |1 | 1.25% | 8590 | despres.r...@laposte.net 1.04% |1 | 1.09% | 7480 | ch...@ietf.org 1.04% |1 | 1.04% | 7174 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.04% |1 | 1.03% | 7110 | st...@stewe.org 1.04% |1 | 0.97% | 6665 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.04% |1 | 0.95% | 6560 | ted.i...@gmail.com 1.04% |1 | 0.91% | 6284 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 1.04% |1 | 0.84% | 5787 | war...@kumari.net 1.04% |1 | 0.83% | 5695 | framefri...@gmail.com 1.04% |1 | 0.81% | 5552 | b...@nostrum.com 1.04% |1 | 0.78% | 5391 | simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca 1.04% |1 | 0.71% | 4880 | julian.resc...@gmx.de 1.04% |1 | 0.63% | 4336 | jari.ar...@piuha.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 96 |100.00% | 687039 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 56 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 21 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 14.29% |8 | 15.33% |66407 | tglas...@earthlink.net 14.29% |8 | 13.55% |58688 | b...@nostrum.com 8.93% |5 | 6.72% |29105 | to...@isi.edu 7.14% |4 | 7.43% |32180 | john-i...@jck.com 5.36% |3 | 7.32% |31698 | b...@estacado.net 5.36% |3 | 6.61% |28631 | hous...@vigilsec.com 5.36% |3 | 6.57% |28437 | si...@josefsson.org 3.57% |2 | 3.09% |13395 | barryle...@computer.org 3.57% |2 | 3.01% |13020 | m...@sap.com 3.57% |2 | 2.97% |12859 | c...@tzi.org 3.57% |2 | 2.94% |12718 | s...@resistor.net 3.57% |2 | 2.81% |12178 | jo...@taugh.com 1.79% |1 | 3.07% |13284 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.79% |1 | 2.25% | 9740 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 1.79% |1 | 2.14% | 9266 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.79% |1 | 2.03% | 8788 | a...@gulbrandsen.priv.no 1.79% |1 | 1.99% | 8635 | lcon...@insensate.co.uk 1.79% |1 | 1.73% | 7497 | s...@harvard.edu 1.79% |1 | 1.52% | 6603 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.79% |1 | 1.51% | 6525 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.79% |1 | 1.44% | 6251 | ch...@ietf.org 1.79% |1 | 1.34% | 5816 | n...@cryptonector.com 1.79% |1 | 1.33% | 5748 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 1.79% |1 | 1.30% | 5611 | joe...@bogus.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 56 |100.00% | 433080 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 150 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 14 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 12.67% | 19 | 11.73% | 116162 | to...@isi.edu 6.67% | 10 | 6.47% |64122 | jo...@taugh.com 5.33% |8 | 6.01% |59500 | john-i...@jck.com 4.67% |7 | 4.65% |46042 | barryle...@computer.org 4.67% |7 | 4.40% |43565 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 4.67% |7 | 3.98% |39383 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.33% |5 | 4.62% |45769 | eric.g...@ericsson.com 3.33% |5 | 3.28% |32519 | l...@cisco.com 3.33% |5 | 3.06% |30300 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 3.33% |5 | 2.49% |24665 | ra...@psg.com 2.67% |4 | 2.10% |20831 | simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca 2.00% |3 | 2.77% |27395 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 2.00% |3 | 2.04% |20188 | s...@resistor.net 2.00% |3 | 2.01% |19880 | m...@sap.com 2.00% |3 | 1.91% |18944 | c...@tzi.org 2.00% |3 | 1.86% |18424 | dcroc...@bbiw.net 1.33% |2 | 1.83% |18142 | flu...@cisco.com 1.33% |2 | 1.68% |16630 | si...@josefsson.org 1.33% |2 | 1.64% |16223 | daedu...@btconnect.com 1.33% |2 | 1.52% |15096 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.33% |2 | 1.35% |13386 | glenz...@gmail.com 1.33% |2 | 1.20% |11892 | david.kess...@nsn.com 1.33% |2 | 1.18% |11664 | ch...@ietf.org 1.33% |2 | 1.11% |11000 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.67% |1 | 1.65% |16355 | l...@netapp.com 0.67% |1 | 1.01% | 9976 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.67% |1 | 0.92% | 9118 | david.bor...@quantum.com 0.67% |1 | 0.86% | 8518 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 0.67% |1 | 0.84% | 8350 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.67% |1 | 0.82% | 8072 | kuor-hsin.ch...@us.elster.com 0.67% |1 | 0.81% | 8034 | lizhong@zte.com.cn 0.67% |1 | 0.77% | 7660 | s...@internet2.edu 0.67% |1 | 0.77% | 7620 | fmar...@linkedin.com 0.67% |1 | 0.74% | 7323 | eburge...@standardstrack.com 0.67% |1 | 0.73% | 7185 | m...@sandelman.ca 0.67% |1 | 0.70% | 6907 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.69% | 6794 | l...@pi.nu 0.67% |1 | 0.67% | 6643 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.67% |1 | 0.65% | 6452 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.67% |1 | 0.65% | 6424 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.64% | 6363 | roni.e...@mail01.huawei.com 0.67% |1 | 0.64% | 6313 | petit...@acm.org 0.67% |1 | 0.63% | 6247 | rob...@raszuk.net 0.67% |1 | 0.63% | 6223 | d...@dotat.at 0.67% |1 | 0.62% | 6100 | klen...@jck.com 0.67% |1 | 0.61% | 6017 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.67% |1 | 0.60% | 5894 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.67% |1 | 0.59% | 5859 | hal...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.59% | 5811 | de...@ihtfp.com 0.67% |1 | 0.58% | 5720 | c...@a.org 0.67% |1 | 0.57% | 5606 | d...@fsround.org 0.67% |1 | 0.56% | 5520 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.55% | 5463 | p...@frobbit.se 0.67% |1 | 0.54% | 5386 | s...@cs.columbia.edu 0.67% |1 | 0.53% | 5283 | rgolod...@infratection.com 0.67% |1 | 0.53% | 5249 | n...@inex.ie 0.67% |1 | 0.52% | 5146 | pe...@akayla.com 0.67% |1 | 0.52% | 5139 | wjh...@hardakers.net 0.67% |1 | 0.50% | 4904 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.67% |1 | 0.49% | 4847 | rbar...@bbn.com 0.67% |1 | 0.42% | 4168 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 150 |100.00% | 990411 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 66 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 7 00:53:03 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.58% |5 | 12.30% |58531 | chris.h...@highwayman.com 6.06% |4 | 5.79% |27548 | john-i...@jck.com 6.06% |4 | 5.37% |25561 | s...@resistor.net 4.55% |3 | 5.12% |24348 | ted.i...@gmail.com 4.55% |3 | 4.11% |19554 | ves...@tana.it 4.55% |3 | 4.01% |19097 | jo...@taugh.com 4.55% |3 | 3.80% |18102 | ch...@ietf.org 4.55% |3 | 3.32% |15818 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.03% |2 | 3.43% |16315 | eric.g...@ericsson.com 3.03% |2 | 3.21% |15264 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 3.03% |2 | 3.16% |15019 | i...@thomasclausen.org 3.03% |2 | 2.83% |13476 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.03% |2 | 2.68% |12739 | vinay...@gmail.com 3.03% |2 | 2.36% |11217 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 3.03% |2 | 2.00% | 9524 | i...@ietf.org 1.52% |1 | 3.06% |14546 | l...@netapp.com 1.52% |1 | 2.02% | 9617 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.52% |1 | 1.93% | 9188 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 1.52% |1 | 1.74% | 8258 | nomcom-ch...@ietf.org 1.52% |1 | 1.67% | 7960 | st...@stewe.org 1.52% |1 | 1.59% | 7582 | tglas...@earthlink.net 1.52% |1 | 1.57% | 7487 | presn...@qualcomm.com 1.52% |1 | 1.57% | 7457 | turn...@ieca.com 1.52% |1 | 1.54% | 7332 | jakob.he...@ericsson.com 1.52% |1 | 1.47% | 7002 | rschr...@schrageconsult.net 1.52% |1 | 1.47% | 7000 | l...@cisco.com 1.52% |1 | 1.46% | 6938 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.52% |1 | 1.45% | 6923 | sc...@kitterman.com 1.52% |1 | 1.44% | 6871 | ma...@isc.org 1.52% |1 | 1.37% | 6533 | s...@sobco.com 1.52% |1 | 1.35% | 6411 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.52% |1 | 1.33% | 6317 | jmp...@cisco.com 1.52% |1 | 1.33% | 6311 | pe...@akayla.com 1.52% |1 | 1.32% | 6285 | co...@isoc.org 1.52% |1 | 1.32% | 6276 | joe...@bogus.com 1.52% |1 | 1.26% | 5977 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.52% |1 | 1.20% | 5696 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.52% |1 | 1.09% | 5166 | d...@xpasc.com 1.52% |1 | 0.97% | 4593 | ra...@psg.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 66 |100.00% | 475839 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 24 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 31 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 16.67% |4 | 21.25% |38527 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 12.50% |3 | 14.71% |26664 | ch...@ietf.org 12.50% |3 | 13.45% |24383 | lber...@labn.net 8.33% |2 | 8.07% |14630 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 8.33% |2 | 6.30% |11430 | bortzme...@nic.fr 4.17% |1 | 5.36% | 9722 | l...@pi.nu 4.17% |1 | 5.09% | 9227 | agma...@gmail.com 4.17% |1 | 4.57% | 8288 | nar...@us.ibm.com 4.17% |1 | 3.69% | 6694 | john-i...@jck.com 4.17% |1 | 3.68% | 6667 | s...@resistor.net 4.17% |1 | 3.07% | 5557 | ves...@tana.it 4.17% |1 | 3.00% | 5446 | b...@nostrum.com 4.17% |1 | 2.78% | 5033 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 4.17% |1 | 2.49% | 4519 | iesg-secret...@ietf.org 4.17% |1 | 2.48% | 4501 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 24 |100.00% | 181288 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 75 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 24 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.33% |4 | 13.12% | 101230 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.67% |2 | 12.89% |99449 | ss...@ciena.com 9.33% |7 | 5.80% |44722 | barryle...@computer.org 8.00% |6 | 6.62% |51081 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 6.67% |5 | 4.05% |31209 | john-i...@jck.com 5.33% |4 | 3.86% |29778 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 5.33% |4 | 3.80% |29300 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 5.33% |4 | 3.60% |27781 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.33% |1 | 6.66% |51385 | acee.lin...@ericsson.com 4.00% |3 | 3.80% |29277 | mstjo...@comcast.net 1.33% |1 | 4.45% |34342 | ly...@ciena.com 2.67% |2 | 1.89% |14548 | o...@cisco.com 2.67% |2 | 1.60% |12372 | joe...@bogus.com 2.67% |2 | 1.56% |12006 | rob...@raszuk.net 2.67% |2 | 1.55% |11993 | dwor...@avaya.com 2.67% |2 | 1.49% |11502 | j...@jck.com 2.67% |2 | 1.32% |10193 | ra...@psg.com 1.33% |1 | 2.47% |19087 | lber...@labn.net 1.33% |1 | 1.71% |13196 | ron.even@gmail.com 1.33% |1 | 1.63% |12575 | denis.pin...@bull.net 1.33% |1 | 1.59% |12247 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.33% |1 | 1.35% |10386 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.33% |1 | 0.93% | 7156 | d3e...@gmail.com 1.33% |1 | 0.89% | 6859 | jonne.soini...@renesasmobile.com 1.33% |1 | 0.87% | 6716 | margaret...@gmail.com 1.33% |1 | 0.83% | 6403 | glenz...@gmail.com 1.33% |1 | 0.83% | 6374 | l...@cisco.com 1.33% |1 | 0.82% | 6305 | d...@xpasc.com 1.33% |1 | 0.81% | 6249 | jo...@taugh.com 1.33% |1 | 0.81% | 6242 | dcroc...@gmail.com 1.33% |1 | 0.78% | 6021 | rpellet...@isoc.org 1.33% |1 | 0.77% | 5952 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.33% |1 | 0.75% | 5808 | s...@resistor.net 1.33% |1 | 0.75% | 5803 | to...@isi.edu 1.33% |1 | 0.72% | 5528 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.33% |1 | 0.68% | 5226 | mic...@krsek.cz 1.33% |1 | 0.67% | 5184 | m...@sandelman.ca 1.33% |1 | 0.66% | 5127 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.33% |1 | 0.63% | 4840 | wjh...@hardakers.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 75 |100.00% | 771452 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 163 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 17 00:53:03 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.91% |8 | 7.08% |93340 | jdr...@juniper.net 6.13% | 10 | 4.96% |65386 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 4.91% |8 | 4.77% |62883 | s...@resistor.net 3.68% |6 | 4.00% |52792 | hal...@gmail.com 3.07% |5 | 2.81% |37061 | john-i...@jck.com 3.07% |5 | 2.31% |30431 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.45% |4 | 2.71% |35766 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.84% |3 | 3.11% |40997 | rich...@shockey.us 2.45% |4 | 2.40% |31667 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.45% |4 | 2.21% |29133 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 1.23% |2 | 3.39% |44784 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.45% |4 | 1.91% |25205 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.45% |4 | 1.79% |23652 | c...@tzi.org 1.84% |3 | 2.28% |30052 | l...@cisco.com 1.84% |3 | 2.26% |29764 | mfbe...@gmail.com 1.84% |3 | 2.04% |26922 | glenz...@gmail.com 1.23% |2 | 2.54% |33489 | g...@gtwassociates.com 1.84% |3 | 1.73% |22871 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 1.84% |3 | 1.68% |2 | joe...@bogus.com 1.84% |3 | 1.60% |21133 | barryle...@computer.org 1.84% |3 | 1.52% |20096 | b...@estacado.net 1.84% |3 | 1.01% |13269 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.23% |2 | 1.49% |19633 | jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com 1.23% |2 | 1.43% |18863 | ves...@tana.it 1.23% |2 | 1.37% |18076 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 1.23% |2 | 1.25% |16504 | to...@isi.edu 1.23% |2 | 1.25% |16488 | aal...@trstech.net 1.23% |2 | 1.21% |15921 | tobias.gond...@gondrom.org 1.23% |2 | 1.05% |13824 | jma...@gmail.com 1.23% |2 | 0.99% |13058 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.23% |2 | 0.95% |12506 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.23% |2 | 0.94% |12449 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.23% |2 | 0.94% |12401 | dcroc...@bbiw.net 1.23% |2 | 0.93% |12321 | aser...@lacnic.net 1.23% |2 | 0.92% |12117 | jo...@taugh.com 1.23% |2 | 0.84% |11129 | s...@sobco.com 1.23% |2 | 0.84% |11071 | m...@sandelman.ca 1.23% |2 | 0.81% |10704 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.23% |2 | 0.75% | 9927 | ra...@psg.com 0.61% |1 | 1.33% |17499 | ebur...@standardstrack.com 0.61% |1 | 1.18% |15504 | mstjo...@comcast.net 0.61% |1 | 1.12% |14839 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 1.02% |13398 | bernard_ab...@hotmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.91% |12050 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.61% |1 | 0.89% |11704 | l...@netapp.com 0.61% |1 | 0.85% |11149 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.61% |1 | 0.80% |10523 | eburge...@standardstrack.com 0.61% |1 | 0.67% | 8899 | philip.eard...@bt.com 0.61% |1 | 0.62% | 8165 | tb...@textuality.com 0.61% |1 | 0.60% | 7901 | nurit.sprec...@nsn.com 0.61% |1 | 0.59% | 7771 | ma...@isc.org 0.61% |1 | 0.54% | 7189 | allison.man...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.54% | 7187 | ge...@proto6.com 0.61% |1 | 0.53% | 7005 | agma...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.53% | 6991 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.61% |1 | 0.53% | 6947 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.52% | 6912 | t...@att.com 0.61% |1 | 0.52% | 6859 | sarikaya2...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.51% | 6675 | f...@cisco.com 0.61% |1 | 0.51% | 6672 | o...@cisco.com 0.61% |1 | 0.50% | 6637 | b...@nostrum.com 0.61% |1 | 0.50% | 6583 | alastair.john...@alcatel-lucent.com 0.61% |1 | 0.49% | 6481 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 0.61% |1 | 0.49% | 6428 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.47% | 6170 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.61% |1 | 0.46% | 6118 | ruediger.g...@telekom.de 0.61% |1 | 0.46% | 6097 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.45% | 5962 | berti...@bwijnen.net 0.61% |1 | 0.44% | 5858 | li...@cs.ucla.edu 0.61% |1 | 0.43% | 5648 | ch...@ietf.org 0.61% |1 | 0.40% | 5234 | d...@virtualized.org 0.61% |1 | 0.40% | 5216 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.61% |1 | 0.39% | 5172 | michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de 0.61% |1 | 0.39% | 5092 | i...@ietf.org 0.61% |1 | 0.37% | 4825 | jari.ar...@piuha.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 163 |100.00% | 1319267 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 245 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 10 00:53:03 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.31% | 13 | 8.41% | 168471 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 4.90% | 12 | 4.16% |83408 | o...@cisco.com 2.45% |6 | 5.60% | 112211 | nurit.sprec...@nsn.com 2.04% |5 | 6.00% | 120224 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 3.27% |8 | 2.69% |53888 | y...@checkpoint.com 3.27% |8 | 2.34% |46944 | jo...@taugh.com 2.45% |6 | 3.12% |62539 | ge...@proto6.com 2.04% |5 | 3.31% |66313 | glenz...@gmail.com 2.86% |7 | 2.31% |46253 | m...@mnot.net 2.86% |7 | 2.14% |42785 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.45% |6 | 1.97% |39500 | dcroc...@bbiw.net 2.04% |5 | 2.35% |47137 | daedu...@btconnect.com 2.45% |6 | 1.87% |37523 | dwor...@avaya.com 2.04% |5 | 1.98% |39752 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.45% |6 | 1.53% |30556 | ra...@psg.com 1.63% |4 | 2.11% |42341 | aser...@lacnic.net 2.04% |5 | 1.66% |33296 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 2.04% |5 | 1.59% |31783 | john-i...@jck.com 2.04% |5 | 1.37% |27425 | m...@sap.com 1.63% |4 | 1.73% |34585 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 1.63% |4 | 1.57% |31541 | sprom...@unina.it 1.63% |4 | 1.43% |28593 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 1.63% |4 | 1.41% |28299 | s...@resistor.net 1.63% |4 | 1.04% |20868 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.22% |3 | 1.42% |28443 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.82% |2 | 1.82% |36521 | rich...@shockey.us 1.22% |3 | 1.04% |20831 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 1.22% |3 | 0.99% |19863 | daniel.karrenb...@ripe.net 1.22% |3 | 0.93% |18630 | c...@tzi.org 1.22% |3 | 0.92% |18414 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.22% |3 | 0.90% |18089 | ves...@tana.it 1.22% |3 | 0.87% |17367 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.22% |3 | 0.69% |13910 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.82% |2 | 1.01% |20137 | to...@isi.edu 0.82% |2 | 0.88% |17558 | barryle...@computer.org 0.82% |2 | 0.79% |15886 | hal...@gmail.com 0.82% |2 | 0.79% |15790 | joe...@bogus.com 0.82% |2 | 0.77% |15482 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 0.82% |2 | 0.74% |14859 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.82% |2 | 0.70% |14070 | d...@cridland.net 0.82% |2 | 0.70% |14009 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.82% |2 | 0.70% |14004 | m...@sandelman.ca 0.82% |2 | 0.64% |12865 | j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de 0.82% |2 | 0.64% |12769 | rob...@raszuk.net 0.82% |2 | 0.63% |12645 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.82% |2 | 0.63% |12579 | agma...@gmail.com 0.82% |2 | 0.61% |12221 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.82% |2 | 0.58% |11652 | rbon...@juniper.net 0.82% |2 | 0.58% |11583 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.82% |2 | 0.58% |11533 | db...@burkov.aha.ru 0.82% |2 | 0.57% |11515 | jason_living...@cable.comcast.com 0.82% |2 | 0.57% |11505 | ma...@isc.org 0.82% |2 | 0.54% |10739 | d...@virtualized.org 0.82% |2 | 0.53% |10528 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 0.41% |1 | 0.85% |17054 | tom.hay...@netapp.com 0.41% |1 | 0.64% |12873 | l...@netapp.com 0.41% |1 | 0.55% |11015 | amor...@amsl.com 0.41% |1 | 0.49% | 9854 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.41% |1 | 0.48% | 9656 | anshumanpra...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.47% | 9422 | daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com 0.41% |1 | 0.46% | 9234 | dhruv.i...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.44% | 8860 | m...@lilacglade.org 0.41% |1 | 0.43% | 8576 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.41% |1 | 0.42% | 8464 | jmp...@cisco.com 0.41% |1 | 0.42% | 8373 | kuor-hsin.ch...@us.elster.com 0.41% |1 | 0.37% | 7446 | a...@hxr.us 0.41% |1 | 0.37% | 7351 | ietf...@comcast.net 0.41% |1 | 0.36% | 7205 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.41% |1 | 0.35% | 7076 | jhild...@cisco.com 0.41% |1 | 0.35% | 6972 | rja.li...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.34% | 6841 | vinay...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.34% | 6779 | tb...@textuality.com 0.41% |1 | 0.34% | 6762 | hen...@levkowetz.com 0.41% |1 | 0.33% | 6566 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.41% |1 | 0.33% | 6554 | st...@stewe.org 0.41% |1 | 0.32% | 6316 | martin.thom...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.31% | 6303 | timo.per...@nsn.com 0.41% |1 | 0.31% | 6137 | mic...@krsek.cz 0.41% |1 | 0.28% | 5655 | p...@frobbit.se 0.41% |1 | 0.28% | 5537 | afar...@juniper.net 0.41% |1 | 0.28% | 5532 | simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca 0.41% |1 | 0.28% | 5531 | tnad...@lucidvision.com 0.41% |1 | 0.27% | 5497 | s...@cs.columbia.edu 0.41% |
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 160 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 3 00:53:03 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.00% |8 | 4.27% |52331 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 5.00% |8 | 4.05% |49608 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 4.38% |7 | 4.28% |52421 | barryle...@computer.org 4.38% |7 | 3.85% |47178 | s...@resistor.net 5.00% |8 | 3.18% |38920 | ra...@psg.com 1.88% |3 | 5.93% |72615 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 3.12% |5 | 3.93% |48062 | glenz...@gmail.com 2.50% |4 | 4.18% |51112 | l...@netapp.com 3.12% |5 | 3.53% |43171 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.12% |5 | 3.12% |38254 | s...@cs.columbia.edu 2.50% |4 | 3.36% |41093 | hal...@gmail.com 3.12% |5 | 2.58% |31625 | dwor...@avaya.com 2.50% |4 | 2.42% |29662 | rob...@raszuk.net 2.50% |4 | 2.40% |29438 | superu...@gmail.com 2.50% |4 | 1.83% |22358 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.88% |3 | 2.34% |28631 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.88% |3 | 1.94% |23770 | droma...@avaya.com 1.88% |3 | 1.93% |23630 | hen...@levkowetz.com 1.88% |3 | 1.80% |22013 | daedu...@btconnect.com 1.25% |2 | 2.41% |29444 | b...@nostrum.com 1.88% |3 | 1.71% |20940 | o...@cisco.com 1.88% |3 | 1.52% |18587 | joe...@bogus.com 1.88% |3 | 1.46% |17823 | ch...@ietf.org 1.88% |3 | 1.27% |15599 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.25% |2 | 1.19% |14600 | d3e...@gmail.com 1.25% |2 | 1.14% |13952 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.25% |2 | 1.13% |13866 | s...@sobco.com 1.25% |2 | 1.08% |13175 | yoshihiro.o...@toshiba.co.jp 1.25% |2 | 1.06% |12995 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.25% |2 | 1.00% |12187 | john-i...@jck.com 1.25% |2 | 0.99% |12069 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.25% |2 | 0.98% |11995 | wei...@watson.org 1.25% |2 | 0.96% |11709 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 1.25% |2 | 0.93% |11351 | p...@frobbit.se 1.25% |2 | 0.85% |10388 | i...@ietf.org 0.62% |1 | 1.12% |13771 | jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com 0.62% |1 | 0.91% |11131 | hannes.tschofe...@nsn.com 0.62% |1 | 0.83% |10147 | rbar...@bbn.com 0.62% |1 | 0.83% |10120 | peer2p...@gmail.com 0.62% |1 | 0.83% |10105 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.62% |1 | 0.76% | 9325 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.62% |1 | 0.70% | 8566 | aser...@lacnic.net 0.62% |1 | 0.68% | 8361 | eburge...@standardstrack.com 0.62% |1 | 0.68% | 8330 | l...@pi.nu 0.62% |1 | 0.67% | 8192 | timo.per...@nsn.com 0.62% |1 | 0.64% | 7828 | o...@nlnetlabs.nl 0.62% |1 | 0.63% | 7722 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 0.62% |1 | 0.63% | 7701 | due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp 0.62% |1 | 0.62% | 7623 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.62% |1 | 0.62% | 7590 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 0.62% |1 | 0.62% | 7550 | dav...@verisign.com 0.62% |1 | 0.61% | 7436 | tb...@textuality.com 0.62% |1 | 0.60% | 7331 | jmp...@cisco.com 0.62% |1 | 0.58% | 7093 | m...@sap.com 0.62% |1 | 0.56% | 6912 | d...@virtualized.org 0.62% |1 | 0.55% | 6674 | tnad...@lucidvision.com 0.62% |1 | 0.52% | 6364 | marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca 0.62% |1 | 0.51% | 6216 | mstjo...@comcast.net 0.62% |1 | 0.51% | 6193 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.62% |1 | 0.49% | 6038 | alexandru.petre...@gmail.com 0.62% |1 | 0.49% | 5995 | crae...@isoc.org 0.62% |1 | 0.48% | 5922 | agma...@gmail.com 0.62% |1 | 0.45% | 5559 | m...@mnot.net 0.62% |1 | 0.43% | 5299 | c...@tzi.org 0.62% |1 | 0.43% | 5292 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 0.62% |1 | 0.43% | 5269 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 160 |100.00% | 1224227 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 116 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 27 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.90% |8 | 6.19% |47718 | jo...@taugh.com 3.45% |4 | 4.06% |31272 | glenz...@gmail.com 2.59% |3 | 4.20% |32317 | ietf...@comcast.net 3.45% |4 | 3.12% |24019 | rbar...@bbn.com 3.45% |4 | 3.11% |23984 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.59% |3 | 3.12% |24019 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.59% |3 | 3.09% |23786 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.59% |3 | 2.91% |22444 | marshall.euba...@gmail.com 2.59% |3 | 2.83% |21837 | jmp...@cisco.com 2.59% |3 | 2.80% |21607 | f...@cisco.com 2.59% |3 | 2.33% |17939 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.59% |3 | 2.08% |16036 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.59% |3 | 2.01% |15474 | i...@ietf.org 1.72% |2 | 2.67% |20578 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.72% |2 | 1.85% |14287 | keith.dr...@alcatel-lucent.com 1.72% |2 | 1.67% |12858 | rich...@shockey.us 1.72% |2 | 1.66% |12800 | war...@kumari.net 1.72% |2 | 1.63% |12553 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.72% |2 | 1.63% |12547 | s...@sobco.com 1.72% |2 | 1.56% |12019 | scott.b...@gmail.com 1.72% |2 | 1.50% |11551 | wei...@watson.org 1.72% |2 | 1.49% |11495 | c...@tzi.org 1.72% |2 | 1.49% |11480 | dwor...@avaya.com 1.72% |2 | 1.41% |10866 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.72% |2 | 1.39% |10694 | joe...@bogus.com 0.86% |1 | 1.60% |12334 | repe...@cisco.com 0.86% |1 | 1.42% |10941 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 0.86% |1 | 1.29% | 9966 | badi...@gmail.com 0.86% |1 | 1.10% | 8442 | b...@nostrum.com 0.86% |1 | 1.08% | 8307 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 0.86% |1 | 1.01% | 7795 | le...@nordu.net 0.86% |1 | 1.01% | 7746 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.86% |1 | 0.99% | 7626 | d.ma...@cablelabs.com 0.86% |1 | 0.96% | 7433 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.86% |1 | 0.90% | 6944 | john.bor...@hughes.com 0.86% |1 | 0.90% | 6918 | ama...@gmail.com 0.86% |1 | 0.89% | 6842 | due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp 0.86% |1 | 0.88% | 6814 | victor.kuarsi...@gmail.com 0.86% |1 | 0.88% | 6771 | julian.resc...@gmx.de 0.86% |1 | 0.88% | 6752 | pthub...@cisco.com 0.86% |1 | 0.87% | 6696 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.86% |1 | 0.86% | 6648 | henk.uijterw...@gmail.com 0.86% |1 | 0.86% | 6588 | hal...@gmail.com 0.86% |1 | 0.84% | 6501 | ya...@cnnic.cn 0.86% |1 | 0.84% | 6436 | g...@gigix.net 0.86% |1 | 0.83% | 6383 | agma...@gmail.com 0.86% |1 | 0.82% | 6289 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.86% |1 | 0.81% | 6212 | o...@cisco.com 0.86% |1 | 0.80% | 6166 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 0.86% |1 | 0.78% | 6046 | s...@harvard.edu 0.86% |1 | 0.78% | 6031 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.86% |1 | 0.78% | 6008 | alexandru.petre...@gmail.com 0.86% |1 | 0.77% | 5912 | d...@xpasc.com 0.86% |1 | 0.77% | 5902 | sarikaya2...@gmail.com 0.86% |1 | 0.76% | 5838 | li...@cs.ucla.edu 0.86% |1 | 0.75% | 5776 | l...@cisco.com 0.86% |1 | 0.75% | 5748 | ra...@qualcomm.com 0.86% |1 | 0.74% | 5736 | yaako...@rad.com 0.86% |1 | 0.74% | 5714 | m...@sap.com 0.86% |1 | 0.73% | 5603 | f...@isoc.org 0.86% |1 | 0.72% | 5550 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.86% |1 | 0.71% | 5474 | martin.thom...@gmail.com 0.86% |1 | 0.69% | 5348 | bortzme...@nic.fr 0.86% |1 | 0.66% | 5116 | john-i...@jck.com 0.86% |1 | 0.66% | 5070 | simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca 0.86% |1 | 0.65% | 5017 | c...@a.org 0.86% |1 | 0.64% | 4908 | geoff.i...@mulligan.com 0.86% |1 | 0.63% | 4883 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.86% |1 | 0.60% | 4628 | ra...@psg.com 0.86% |1 | 0.56% | 4295 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 116 |100.00% | 770333 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 36 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 20 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.56% |2 | 11.13% |29264 | ron.even@gmail.com 8.33% |3 | 8.28% |21783 | s...@resistor.net 8.33% |3 | 7.65% |20102 | hous...@vigilsec.com 8.33% |3 | 6.52% |17141 | jab...@hopcount.ca 5.56% |2 | 5.66% |14878 | presn...@qualcomm.com 2.78% |1 | 4.58% |12034 | anne-marie.eklund-lowin...@iis.se 2.78% |1 | 4.12% |10825 | david.bl...@emc.com 2.78% |1 | 3.69% | 9715 | scottr.n...@gmail.com 2.78% |1 | 3.03% | 7975 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 2.78% |1 | 2.93% | 7703 | j...@wide.ad.jp 2.78% |1 | 2.89% | 7592 | gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com 2.78% |1 | 2.86% | 7533 | nar...@us.ibm.com 2.78% |1 | 2.82% | 7403 | huit...@microsoft.com 2.78% |1 | 2.72% | 7143 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.78% |1 | 2.53% | 6662 | to...@isi.edu 2.78% |1 | 2.46% | 6458 | le...@nordu.net 2.78% |1 | 2.44% | 6423 | simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca 2.78% |1 | 2.44% | 6405 | fred...@kirei.se 2.78% |1 | 2.35% | 6168 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 2.78% |1 | 2.24% | 5887 | pe...@akayla.com 2.78% |1 | 2.19% | 5753 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 2.78% |1 | 2.19% | 5750 | jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com 2.78% |1 | 2.18% | 5725 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 2.78% |1 | 2.16% | 5670 | john-i...@jck.com 2.78% |1 | 2.12% | 5567 | k...@bbn.com 2.78% |1 | 2.05% | 5395 | i...@ietf.org 2.78% |1 | 2.01% | 5288 | wei...@watson.org 2.78% |1 | 1.79% | 4694 | ra...@psg.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 36 |100.00% | 262936 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 48 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 13 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 14.58% |7 | 14.77% |53370 | andr...@sbin.se 14.58% |7 | 14.50% |52367 | simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca 8.33% |4 | 7.11% |25667 | s...@resistor.net 6.25% |3 | 6.14% |22184 | acoo...@cdt.org 6.25% |3 | 6.04% |21832 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 4.17% |2 | 4.95% |17897 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 4.17% |2 | 4.53% |16378 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.17% |2 | 4.36% |15761 | t...@att.com 4.17% |2 | 3.41% |12330 | john-i...@jck.com 4.17% |2 | 3.28% |11832 | miyak...@nttv6.jp 2.08% |1 | 3.75% |13544 | tina.tsou.zout...@huawei.com 2.08% |1 | 2.71% | 9801 | rbar...@bbn.com 2.08% |1 | 2.59% | 9358 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.08% |1 | 2.56% | 9253 | droma...@avaya.com 2.08% |1 | 2.45% | 8860 | rich...@shockey.us 2.08% |1 | 2.44% | 8822 | hous...@vigilsec.com 2.08% |1 | 2.42% | 8743 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 2.08% |1 | 2.13% | 7683 | nar...@us.ibm.com 2.08% |1 | 1.89% | 6835 | sha...@juniper.net 2.08% |1 | 1.88% | 6773 | bill...@huawei.com 2.08% |1 | 1.72% | 6207 | ch...@ietf.org 2.08% |1 | 1.57% | 5687 | w...@1wt.eu 2.08% |1 | 1.40% | 5066 | rob...@raszuk.net 2.08% |1 | 1.38% | 4976 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 48 |100.00% | 361226 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 41 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 6 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.32% |3 | 12.21% |44570 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 7.32% |3 | 11.14% |40646 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 7.32% |3 | 9.25% |33769 | david.bl...@emc.com 7.32% |3 | 5.15% |18811 | hous...@vigilsec.com 7.32% |3 | 5.01% |18270 | john-i...@jck.com 4.88% |2 | 6.16% |22500 | alan.b.johns...@gmail.com 4.88% |2 | 4.17% |15211 | t...@att.com 4.88% |2 | 3.54% |12928 | joe...@bogus.com 4.88% |2 | 3.11% |11368 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 4.88% |2 | 2.98% |10872 | julian.resc...@gmx.de 2.44% |1 | 4.78% |17462 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 2.44% |1 | 3.23% |11790 | l...@netapp.com 2.44% |1 | 2.87% |10461 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.44% |1 | 2.82% |10275 | dirk.kutsc...@neclab.eu 2.44% |1 | 2.64% | 9638 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.44% |1 | 2.61% | 9514 | s...@resistor.net 2.44% |1 | 2.25% | 8209 | masah...@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp 2.44% |1 | 2.23% | 8133 | due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp 2.44% |1 | 2.18% | 7961 | nar...@us.ibm.com 2.44% |1 | 1.89% | 6881 | dwor...@avaya.com 2.44% |1 | 1.84% | 6717 | to...@isi.edu 2.44% |1 | 1.84% | 6707 | pe...@akayla.com 2.44% |1 | 1.67% | 6085 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 2.44% |1 | 1.61% | 5862 | jo...@taugh.com 2.44% |1 | 1.51% | 5503 | b...@nostrum.com 2.44% |1 | 1.33% | 4857 | ra...@psg.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 41 |100.00% | 365000 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 63 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 29 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 11.11% |7 | 8.79% |41754 | stpe...@stpeter.im 7.94% |5 | 8.63% |41009 | barryle...@computer.org 7.94% |5 | 8.35% |39674 | st...@stewe.org 6.35% |4 | 5.36% |25484 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.76% |3 | 5.96% |28300 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 3.17% |2 | 4.25% |20199 | due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp 3.17% |2 | 3.49% |16603 | cntre...@gmail.com 3.17% |2 | 3.49% |16578 | acoo...@cdt.org 3.17% |2 | 3.01% |14300 | mel...@fugue.com 3.17% |2 | 2.97% |14087 | uyesh...@ifa.hawaii.edu 3.17% |2 | 2.84% |13516 | john-i...@jck.com 3.17% |2 | 2.75% |13077 | tglas...@earthlink.net 3.17% |2 | 2.57% |12205 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 3.17% |2 | 2.03% | 9641 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.59% |1 | 3.10% |14728 | ron.even@gmail.com 1.59% |1 | 2.90% |13770 | l...@netapp.com 1.59% |1 | 2.65% |12579 | dan-i...@danyork.org 1.59% |1 | 2.63% |12472 | alan.b.johns...@gmail.com 1.59% |1 | 2.18% |10352 | tom.hay...@netapp.com 1.59% |1 | 2.11% |10007 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.59% |1 | 1.79% | 8524 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.59% |1 | 1.69% | 8052 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.59% |1 | 1.55% | 7368 | salvatore.lor...@ericsson.com 1.59% |1 | 1.43% | 6803 | marshall.euba...@gmail.com 1.59% |1 | 1.36% | 6439 | s...@resistor.net 1.59% |1 | 1.34% | 6385 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.59% |1 | 1.34% | 6346 | joe...@bogus.com 1.59% |1 | 1.30% | 6195 | d3e...@gmail.com 1.59% |1 | 1.30% | 6192 | ma...@isc.org 1.59% |1 | 1.23% | 5855 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.59% |1 | 1.16% | 5493 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 1.59% |1 | 1.14% | 5402 | d...@dotat.at 1.59% |1 | 1.13% | 5363 | tnad...@lucidvision.com 1.59% |1 | 1.09% | 5197 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 1.59% |1 | 1.09% | 5158 | ra...@psg.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 63 |100.00% | 475107 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 90 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 22 00:53:01 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 13.33% | 12 | 12.25% | 100292 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 10.00% |9 | 7.70% |63054 | to...@isi.edu 10.00% |9 | 7.40% |60622 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 3.33% |3 | 8.63% |70669 | g...@ninebynine.org 2.22% |2 | 5.04% |41277 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 3.33% |3 | 3.65% |29879 | barryle...@computer.org 1.11% |1 | 5.17% |42315 | paul_sangs...@symantec.com 1.11% |1 | 4.88% |40005 | ron.even@gmail.com 3.33% |3 | 2.54% |20818 | s...@resistor.net 3.33% |3 | 2.23% |18225 | john-i...@jck.com 3.33% |3 | 2.09% |17131 | stpe...@stpeter.im 2.22% |2 | 2.75% |22524 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 2.22% |2 | 2.53% |20699 | due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp 2.22% |2 | 2.36% |19294 | st...@stewe.org 2.22% |2 | 2.02% |16530 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.22% |2 | 1.87% |15274 | ch...@ietf.org 2.22% |2 | 1.82% |14909 | ves...@tana.it 2.22% |2 | 1.51% |12370 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.22% |2 | 1.51% |12346 | jo...@iecc.com 2.22% |2 | 1.51% |12329 | har...@alvestrand.no 2.22% |2 | 1.43% |11721 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.11% |1 | 2.24% |18382 | dan-i...@danyork.org 2.22% |2 | 1.13% | 9264 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.11% |1 | 1.11% | 9064 | edj@gmail.com 1.11% |1 | 1.09% | 8930 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.11% |1 | 1.09% | 8923 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.11% |1 | 1.07% | 8744 | cntre...@gmail.com 1.11% |1 | 1.06% | 8644 | joe...@bogus.com 1.11% |1 | 1.00% | 8190 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 1.11% |1 | 0.99% | 8119 | scott.b...@gmail.com 1.11% |1 | 0.97% | 7926 | eburge...@standardstrack.com 1.11% |1 | 0.86% | 7065 | jason_living...@cable.comcast.com 1.11% |1 | 0.84% | 6872 | dcroc...@bbiw.net 1.11% |1 | 0.83% | 6830 | rbar...@bbn.com 1.11% |1 | 0.74% | 6047 | jmp...@cisco.com 1.11% |1 | 0.74% | 6045 | d...@xpasc.com 1.11% |1 | 0.73% | 6014 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.11% |1 | 0.72% | 5924 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.11% |1 | 0.68% | 5599 | s...@cs.columbia.edu 1.11% |1 | 0.66% | 5397 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.11% |1 | 0.57% | 4698 | ra...@psg.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 90 |100.00% | 818960 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 119 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 15 00:53:03 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 12.61% | 15 | 18.08% | 190700 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 5.88% |7 | 9.35% |98669 | due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp 5.04% |6 | 3.88% |40902 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.52% |3 | 5.34% |56277 | paul_sangs...@symantec.com 4.20% |5 | 3.31% |34932 | john-i...@jck.com 4.20% |5 | 2.94% |30959 | stpe...@stpeter.im 4.20% |5 | 2.61% |27534 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 3.36% |4 | 3.20% |33801 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 3.36% |4 | 2.85% |30072 | s...@resistor.net 3.36% |4 | 2.40% |25278 | hous...@vigilsec.com 3.36% |4 | 1.90% |20072 | ra...@psg.com 2.52% |3 | 2.49% |26228 | daedu...@btconnect.com 2.52% |3 | 2.31% |24379 | dwor...@avaya.com 2.52% |3 | 2.30% |24235 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.52% |3 | 2.03% |21453 | glenz...@gmail.com 2.52% |3 | 1.73% |18277 | derhoe...@gmx.net 2.52% |3 | 1.72% |18167 | m...@sap.com 0.84% |1 | 2.96% |31181 | anandmad...@gmail.com 1.68% |2 | 2.00% |21114 | r...@mumble.net 0.84% |1 | 2.37% |25010 | dan.p...@opennetworking.org 1.68% |2 | 1.46% |15418 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.68% |2 | 1.39% |14631 | s...@harvard.edu 1.68% |2 | 1.27% |13432 | ch...@ietf.org 1.68% |2 | 1.23% |12973 | o...@cisco.com 1.68% |2 | 1.15% |12089 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.68% |2 | 1.10% |11599 | war...@kumari.net 0.84% |1 | 1.07% |11279 | hartm...@mit.edu 0.84% |1 | 1.07% |11265 | st...@stewe.org 0.84% |1 | 0.89% | 9396 | enkec...@cisco.com 0.84% |1 | 0.86% | 9101 | j...@jlc.net 0.84% |1 | 0.85% | 8940 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.84% |1 | 0.80% | 8486 | t...@att.com 0.84% |1 | 0.80% | 8484 | barryle...@computer.org 0.84% |1 | 0.80% | 8412 | l...@cisco.com 0.84% |1 | 0.76% | 7992 | droma...@avaya.com 0.84% |1 | 0.74% | 7780 | b...@nostrum.com 0.84% |1 | 0.73% | 7708 | tglas...@earthlink.net 0.84% |1 | 0.72% | 7545 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.84% |1 | 0.68% | 7143 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 0.84% |1 | 0.68% | 7131 | j...@wide.ad.jp 0.84% |1 | 0.63% | 6654 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.84% |1 | 0.62% | 6569 | i...@ietf.org 0.84% |1 | 0.61% | 6415 | martin.thom...@gmail.com 0.84% |1 | 0.60% | 6369 | d...@dcrocker.net 0.84% |1 | 0.57% | 6020 | jo...@iecc.com 0.84% |1 | 0.57% | 5968 | j...@jck.com 0.84% |1 | 0.54% | 5669 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 0.84% |1 | 0.53% | 5571 | suresh.krish...@ericsson.com 0.84% |1 | 0.52% | 5489 | julian.resc...@gmx.de +--++--+ 100.00% | 119 |100.00% | 1054768 | Total
Re: registries and designated experts
Maybe an IESG statement on this respect can help here. Is the existing text in RFC 5226 not sufficient? It contains extensive text about the purpose and role of designated experts, and was revised substantially the last time around to try and find a good middle ground between being overly prescriptive and giving experts a blank check to do what they want. Nothing in the discussion I've seen so far in this thread seems at odds with or beyond what is already in RFC 5226 (but I may be biased). Thomas
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 73 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 8 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 9.59% |7 | 7.32% |47136 | to...@isi.edu 4.11% |3 | 9.22% |59420 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 6.85% |5 | 5.61% |36144 | s...@resistor.net 5.48% |4 | 6.06% |39055 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.11% |3 | 3.99% |25726 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 4.11% |3 | 3.53% |22734 | john-i...@jck.com 2.74% |2 | 4.25% |27390 | d3e...@gmail.com 4.11% |3 | 2.84% |18305 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 4.11% |3 | 2.72% |17519 | he...@pobox.com 1.37% |1 | 4.89% |31480 | due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp 1.37% |1 | 3.92% |25256 | vincent.r...@inria.fr 1.37% |1 | 3.61% |23258 | ron.even@gmail.com 2.74% |2 | 2.20% |14159 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 2.74% |2 | 1.81% |11632 | hous...@vigilsec.com 2.74% |2 | 1.74% |11206 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.74% |2 | 1.71% |11041 | joe...@bogus.com 1.37% |1 | 3.02% |19471 | d.stu...@att.net 1.37% |1 | 2.22% |14291 | l...@netapp.com 1.37% |1 | 2.14% |13814 | b...@nostrum.com 1.37% |1 | 1.53% | 9865 | l...@cisco.com 1.37% |1 | 1.38% | 8884 | r...@mumble.net 1.37% |1 | 1.38% | 8880 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.37% |1 | 1.30% | 8345 | eburge...@standardstrack.com 1.37% |1 | 1.22% | 7876 | derhoe...@gmx.net 1.37% |1 | 1.20% | 7702 | mel...@fugue.com 1.37% |1 | 1.18% | 7604 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 1.37% |1 | 1.17% | 7532 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 1.37% |1 | 1.14% | 7356 | s...@harvard.edu 1.37% |1 | 1.11% | 7173 | lly...@civil-tongue.net 1.37% |1 | 1.10% | 7082 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.37% |1 | 1.09% | 7049 | daedu...@btconnect.com 1.37% |1 | 1.04% | 6712 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.37% |1 | 1.00% | 6465 | f...@cisco.com 1.37% |1 | 0.95% | 6135 | n...@inex.ie 1.37% |1 | 0.94% | 6036 | glenz...@gmail.com 1.37% |1 | 0.93% | 5965 | tnad...@lucidvision.com 1.37% |1 | 0.91% | 5893 | rbar...@bbn.com 1.37% |1 | 0.91% | 5864 | war...@kumari.net 1.37% |1 | 0.91% | 5849 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.37% |1 | 0.89% | 5738 | d...@virtualized.org 1.37% |1 | 0.88% | 5652 | li...@cs.ucla.edu 1.37% |1 | 0.78% | 5010 | m...@sap.com 1.37% |1 | 0.77% | 4984 | ra...@psg.com 1.37% |1 | 0.75% | 4803 | p...@cypherpunks.ca 1.37% |1 | 0.73% | 4712 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 73 |100.00% | 644203 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 76 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 1 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 11.84% |9 | 10.55% |60521 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 6.58% |5 | 4.99% |28656 | bortzme...@nic.fr 5.26% |4 | 5.11% |29344 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 5.26% |4 | 4.92% |28206 | john-i...@jck.com 3.95% |3 | 2.93% |16803 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.32% |1 | 5.43% |31182 | bcla...@cisco.com 1.32% |1 | 5.13% |29420 | ron.even@gmail.com 2.63% |2 | 3.35% |19220 | s...@resistor.net 2.63% |2 | 2.54% |14594 | o...@cisco.com 2.63% |2 | 2.39% |13720 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.63% |2 | 2.29% |13169 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 2.63% |2 | 2.01% |11525 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.63% |2 | 1.94% |11147 | simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca 2.63% |2 | 1.81% |10366 | jo...@iecc.com 2.63% |2 | 1.66% | 9540 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.32% |1 | 2.40% |13754 | turn...@ieca.com 1.32% |1 | 2.21% |12707 | l...@cisco.com 1.32% |1 | 2.09% |12016 | g...@gtwassociates.com 1.32% |1 | 2.08% |11949 | ietf...@comcast.net 1.32% |1 | 1.91% |10932 | flu...@iii.ca 1.32% |1 | 1.59% | 9123 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 1.32% |1 | 1.46% | 8382 | kl...@cisco.com 1.32% |1 | 1.46% | 8360 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.32% |1 | 1.40% | 8049 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.32% |1 | 1.36% | 7801 | fadi20052...@gmail.com 1.32% |1 | 1.36% | 7797 | basavaraj.pa...@nokia.com 1.32% |1 | 1.35% | 7738 | b...@nostrum.com 1.32% |1 | 1.31% | 7531 | m...@cloudmark.com 1.32% |1 | 1.31% | 7489 | droma...@avaya.com 1.32% |1 | 1.21% | 6922 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.32% |1 | 1.17% | 6697 | me...@globetel.com.ph 1.32% |1 | 1.15% | 6583 | scott.b...@gmail.com 1.32% |1 | 1.10% | 6334 | dcroc...@bbiw.net 1.32% |1 | 1.10% | 6288 | f...@cisco.com 1.32% |1 | 1.09% | 6240 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.32% |1 | 1.07% | 6112 | i...@ietf.org 1.32% |1 | 1.06% | 6094 | rbar...@bbn.com 1.32% |1 | 1.06% | 6066 | n...@inex.ie 1.32% |1 | 1.06% | 6064 | tb...@textuality.com 1.32% |1 | 1.04% | 5976 | fa...@isi.edu 1.32% |1 | 1.02% | 5826 | he...@pobox.com 1.32% |1 | 1.00% | 5767 | joe...@bogus.com 1.32% |1 | 0.97% | 5567 | pe...@akayla.com 1.32% |1 | 0.96% | 5490 | m...@sap.com 1.32% |1 | 0.95% | 5468 | b...@niven-jenkins.co.uk 1.32% |1 | 0.93% | 5338 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.32% |1 | 0.89% | 5080 | thierry.mor...@connotech.com 1.32% |1 | 0.85% | 4883 | malcolm.be...@zte.com.cn +--++--+ 100.00% | 76 |100.00% | 573836 | Total
