Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 79 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Oct 4 08:42:50 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 8.86% |7 | 9.36% |66764 | hsan...@isdg.net 3.80% |3 | 9.16% |65302 | david.bl...@emc.com 6.33% |5 | 4.74% |33801 | john-i...@jck.com 5.06% |4 | 5.48% |39069 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 3.80% |3 | 4.65% |33150 | k...@bbn.com 5.06% |4 | 3.37% |24045 | barryle...@computer.org 3.80% |3 | 4.42% |31537 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 5.06% |4 | 3.15% |22491 | m...@sandelman.ca 3.80% |3 | 4.01% |28575 | superu...@gmail.com 3.80% |3 | 3.88% |27640 | gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com 3.80% |3 | 2.98% |21246 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 2.53% |2 | 4.17% |29754 | bmann...@isi.edu 3.80% |3 | 2.46% |17558 | s...@sobco.com 1.27% |1 | 4.21% |30050 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 2.53% |2 | 2.92% |20858 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.53% |2 | 2.29% |16353 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 2.53% |2 | 2.07% |14791 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 2.53% |2 | 1.92% |13699 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.53% |2 | 1.82% |13001 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.53% |2 | 1.80% |12824 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.53% |2 | 1.78% |12667 | alexandru.petre...@gmail.com 1.27% |1 | 2.77% |19748 | jdr...@juniper.net 1.27% |1 | 1.36% | 9707 | o...@nlnetlabs.nl 1.27% |1 | 1.28% | 9155 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 1.27% |1 | 1.25% | 8881 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.27% |1 | 1.22% | 8667 | b...@nostrum.com 1.27% |1 | 1.21% | 8618 | huub.van.helvo...@huawei.com 1.27% |1 | 1.15% | 8225 | d...@cridland.net 1.27% |1 | 1.12% | 8023 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.27% |1 | 1.00% | 7126 | joe...@bogus.com 1.27% |1 | 0.95% | 6809 | ietf...@comcast.net 1.27% |1 | 0.94% | 6715 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.27% |1 | 0.93% | 6657 | sc...@kitterman.com 1.27% |1 | 0.88% | 6245 | ves...@tana.it 1.27% |1 | 0.86% | 6150 | morrowc.li...@gmail.com 1.27% |1 | 0.85% | 6062 | jo...@taugh.com 1.27% |1 | 0.85% | 6059 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 1.27% |1 | 0.73% | 5188 | j...@nlnetlabs.nl +--++--+ 100.00% | 79 |100.00% | 713210 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Oct 4 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ +--++--+
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 127 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 27 01:00:00 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.30% |8 | 5.79% |56383 | s...@resistor.net 5.51% |7 | 4.93% |47948 | ra...@psg.com 5.51% |7 | 4.71% |45812 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 4.72% |6 | 5.27% |51314 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 3.94% |5 | 5.08% |49479 | hal...@gmail.com 4.72% |6 | 3.67% |35699 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 3.15% |4 | 4.72% |45919 | david.bl...@emc.com 3.15% |4 | 3.02% |29384 | scott.b...@gmail.com 3.15% |4 | 2.64% |25725 | john-i...@jck.com 3.15% |4 | 2.55% |24778 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.36% |3 | 3.27% |31813 | ya...@juniper.net 3.15% |4 | 2.07% |20167 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 2.36% |3 | 2.55% |24814 | b...@nostrum.com 2.36% |3 | 2.46% |23902 | huit...@microsoft.com 2.36% |3 | 2.41% |23452 | nar...@us.ibm.com 2.36% |3 | 2.10% |20449 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.36% |3 | 1.96% |19122 | rog...@gmail.com 2.36% |3 | 1.83% |17821 | m...@mnot.net 2.36% |3 | 1.80% |17559 | ch...@ietf.org 1.57% |2 | 2.23% |21665 | tglas...@earthlink.net 1.57% |2 | 2.11% |20574 | morrowc.li...@gmail.com 1.57% |2 | 1.87% |18215 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 1.57% |2 | 1.46% |14200 | josh.howl...@ja.net 1.57% |2 | 1.45% |14107 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.57% |2 | 1.31% |12714 | p...@cypherpunks.ca 1.57% |2 | 1.27% |12369 | har...@alvestrand.no 1.57% |2 | 1.23% |11987 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.57% |2 | 1.21% |11813 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.79% |1 | 1.87% |18157 | jouni.nos...@gmail.com 0.79% |1 | 1.78% |17300 | dafa...@yahoo.com 0.79% |1 | 1.47% |14339 | he...@pobox.com 0.79% |1 | 1.28% |12470 | bcla...@cisco.com 0.79% |1 | 1.06% |10312 | ttau...@1-4-5.net 0.79% |1 | 0.98% | 9581 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 0.79% |1 | 0.94% | 9137 | rifaat.i...@gmail.com 0.79% |1 | 0.94% | 9103 | k...@chrysler.com 0.79% |1 | 0.92% | 8946 | d...@cridland.net 0.79% |1 | 0.87% | 8433 | gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com 0.79% |1 | 0.81% | 7926 | cgriffi...@gmail.com 0.79% |1 | 0.80% | 7780 | nomcom-ch...@ietf.org 0.79% |1 | 0.79% | 7693 | tglas...@certichron.com 0.79% |1 | 0.77% | 7468 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.79% |1 | 0.73% | 7148 | b...@google.com 0.79% |1 | 0.73% | 7113 | l...@netapp.com 0.79% |1 | 0.73% | 7109 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 0.79% |1 | 0.70% | 6860 | c...@tzi.org 0.79% |1 | 0.70% | 6846 | joe...@bogus.com 0.79% |1 | 0.62% | 6070 | jo...@taugh.com 0.79% |1 | 0.62% | 6051 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 0.79% |1 | 0.61% | 5892 | st...@shinkuro.com 0.79% |1 | 0.60% | 5874 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.79% |1 | 0.59% | 5745 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.79% |1 | 0.58% | 5666 | sust...@250bpm.com 0.79% |1 | 0.53% | 5176 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 127 |100.00% | 973379 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 20 14:38:57 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ +--++--+
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 20 14:39:19 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ +--++--+
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 209 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 20 14:42:33 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 3.83% |8 | 7.47% | 133327 | o...@nlnetlabs.nl 5.74% | 12 | 4.92% |87860 | john-i...@jck.com 3.83% |8 | 4.58% |81774 | hal...@gmail.com 4.31% |9 | 3.11% |55565 | a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk 4.31% |9 | 3.10% |55274 | jo...@taugh.com 3.83% |8 | 3.11% |55477 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.83% |8 | 3.09% |55075 | scott.b...@gmail.com 3.83% |8 | 3.06% |54562 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 3.83% |8 | 2.93% |52269 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.39% |5 | 3.31% |59038 | gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com 2.87% |6 | 2.25% |40200 | g...@net-zen.net 2.87% |6 | 1.82% |32472 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 2.39% |5 | 2.23% |39739 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 2.39% |5 | 2.20% |39268 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.48% |1 | 3.87% |69051 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.91% |4 | 1.80% |32202 | d...@cridland.net 1.91% |4 | 1.58% |28124 | michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de 1.91% |4 | 1.44% |25786 | c...@tzi.org 1.91% |4 | 1.12% |19974 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.44% |3 | 1.36% |24203 | s...@resistor.net 1.44% |3 | 1.17% |20945 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.44% |3 | 1.15% |20567 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.48% |1 | 2.09% |37351 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 1.44% |3 | 0.97% |17323 | ch...@ietf.org 0.96% |2 | 1.21% |21665 | tglas...@earthlink.net 0.96% |2 | 1.17% |20916 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 0.96% |2 | 1.10% |19713 | alan.d.cl...@telchemy.com 0.96% |2 | 1.09% |19469 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.96% |2 | 1.02% |18215 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 0.96% |2 | 0.98% |17570 | tobias.gond...@gondrom.org 0.96% |2 | 0.96% |17181 | bdick...@verisign.com 0.96% |2 | 0.88% |15680 | war...@kumari.net 0.96% |2 | 0.76% |13523 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.96% |2 | 0.75% |13443 | barryle...@computer.org 0.96% |2 | 0.75% |13378 | st...@shinkuro.com 0.96% |2 | 0.74% |13136 | jul...@braga.eti.br 0.96% |2 | 0.73% |13097 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.96% |2 | 0.72% |12895 | s...@sobco.com 0.96% |2 | 0.69% |12369 | har...@alvestrand.no 0.48% |1 | 1.17% |20821 | aal...@blackberry.com 0.96% |2 | 0.67% |12047 | d...@xpasc.com 0.96% |2 | 0.64% |11467 | m...@sap.com 0.48% |1 | 1.05% |18809 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.48% |1 | 1.02% |18157 | jouni.nos...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.93% |16540 | j...@freedesktop.org 0.48% |1 | 0.77% |13689 | glen.wi...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.72% |12776 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.68% |12177 | droma...@avaya.com 0.48% |1 | 0.67% |12034 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.48% |1 | 0.67% |12022 | g...@gtwassociates.com 0.48% |1 | 0.66% |11779 | i...@thomasclausen.org 0.48% |1 | 0.66% |11719 | gda...@au.logicalis.com 0.48% |1 | 0.60% |10763 | bow...@web9.com 0.48% |1 | 0.55% | 9897 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 0.48% |1 | 0.55% | 9747 | klen...@jck.com 0.48% |1 | 0.52% | 9271 | da...@tcb.net 0.48% |1 | 0.51% | 9182 | g...@algebras.org 0.48% |1 | 0.51% | 9103 | k...@chrysler.com 0.48% |1 | 0.51% | 9102 | pau...@packetizer.com 0.48% |1 | 0.50% | 8902 | b...@nostrum.com 0.48% |1 | 0.49% | 8699 | l...@cisco.com 0.48% |1 | 0.48% | 8606 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.47% | 8360 | nwea...@icsi.berkeley.edu 0.48% |1 | 0.45% | 8102 | d...@dcrocker.net 0.48% |1 | 0.43% | 7758 | ptha...@broadcom.com 0.48% |1 | 0.43% | 7652 | gsalg...@cisco.com 0.48% |1 | 0.42% | 7448 | t...@att.com 0.48% |1 | 0.41% | 7313 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.40% | 7211 | agma...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.40% | 7117 | l...@netapp.com 0.48% |1 | 0.39% | 7031 | a...@nostrum.com 0.48% |1 | 0.38% | 6833 | josh.howl...@ja.net 0.48% |1 | 0.38% | 6757 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.48% |1 | 0.36% | 6440 | m...@sandelman.ca 0.48% |1 | 0.36% | 6397 | joe...@bogus.com 0.48% |1 | 0.34% | 6051 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 0.48% |1 | 0.33% | 5939 | ru...@riw.us 0.48% |1 | 0.32% | 5666 | sust...@250bpm.com 0.48% |1 | 0.31% | 5563 | geoff.i...@mulligan.com 0.48% |1 | 0.30% | 5354 | majid.mjd...@gmail.com 0.48% |1 | 0.29% | 5203 | ra...@psg.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 209 |100.00% | 1785180 | Total
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
On Sep 20, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com wrote: Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 20 14:38:57 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ +--++--+ No, that's just wishful thinking. --Paul Hoffman
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 353 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 13 00:53:04 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 11.33% | 40 | 9.28% | 281400 | ted.le...@nominum.com 6.80% | 24 | 8.08% | 244815 | hal...@gmail.com 2.55% |9 | 3.87% | 117217 | lore...@google.com 1.98% |7 | 3.78% | 114498 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 3.12% | 11 | 2.44% |73922 | s...@resistor.net 1.13% |4 | 4.22% | 128021 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.55% |9 | 1.90% |57637 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.27% |8 | 1.89% |57219 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.27% |8 | 1.82% |55303 | scott.b...@gmail.com 2.27% |8 | 1.82% |55077 | ty...@mit.edu 2.55% |9 | 1.51% |45914 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.98% |7 | 1.89% |57339 | jo...@taugh.com 1.70% |6 | 2.07% |62717 | superu...@gmail.com 1.98% |7 | 1.74% |52721 | john-i...@jck.com 0.85% |3 | 2.78% |84301 | o...@delong.com 1.98% |7 | 1.53% |46463 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 1.70% |6 | 1.69% |51128 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.70% |6 | 1.51% |45915 | joe...@bogus.com 0.57% |2 | 2.61% |78993 | zhangfa...@huawei.com 1.70% |6 | 1.31% |39590 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.70% |6 | 1.29% |39128 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.70% |6 | 1.27% |38449 | sc...@kitterman.com 1.70% |6 | 1.12% |34088 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 1.42% |5 | 1.35% |40829 | jab...@hopcount.ca 1.42% |5 | 1.18% |35757 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 0.85% |3 | 1.71% |51725 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 1.42% |5 | 1.09% |32975 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.42% |5 | 1.04% |31548 | d...@dotat.at 1.13% |4 | 1.19% |36054 | p...@frobbit.se 1.13% |4 | 1.14% |34686 | daedu...@btconnect.com 1.13% |4 | 1.11% |33768 | o...@ogud.com 1.13% |4 | 0.91% |27692 | p...@nohats.ca 1.13% |4 | 0.91% |27544 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.13% |4 | 0.90% |27200 | jmamo...@gmail.com 1.13% |4 | 0.89% |26945 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.13% |4 | 0.85% |25864 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.85% |3 | 0.81% |24629 | nwea...@icsi.berkeley.edu 0.85% |3 | 0.78% |23731 | tramm...@tik.ee.ethz.ch 0.85% |3 | 0.68% |20746 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.85% |3 | 0.64% |19344 | rog...@gmail.com 0.85% |3 | 0.64% |19334 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.85% |3 | 0.62% |18716 | l...@cisco.com 0.85% |3 | 0.60% |18143 | d...@xpasc.com 0.57% |2 | 0.67% |20167 | pe...@akayla.com 0.57% |2 | 0.57% |17181 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 0.57% |2 | 0.49% |14714 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 0.57% |2 | 0.48% |14543 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.57% |2 | 0.47% |14263 | interf...@gmail.com 0.57% |2 | 0.46% |13938 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.57% |2 | 0.46% |13895 | d...@virtualized.org 0.57% |2 | 0.45% |13545 | p...@cypherpunks.ca 0.57% |2 | 0.44% |13476 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 0.28% |1 | 0.72% |21968 | agma...@gmail.com 0.57% |2 | 0.44% |13310 | st...@shinkuro.com 0.57% |2 | 0.42% |12802 | m...@sandelman.ca 0.28% |1 | 0.68% |20521 | jmp...@cisco.com 0.57% |2 | 0.39% |11779 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.57% |2 | 0.38% |11424 | to...@isi.edu 0.28% |1 | 0.61% |18611 | gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com 0.28% |1 | 0.47% |14313 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.28% |1 | 0.46% |14077 | dan-i...@danyork.org 0.28% |1 | 0.41% |12337 | j...@freedesktop.org 0.28% |1 | 0.40% |12225 | d...@cridland.net 0.28% |1 | 0.40% |12175 | mar...@millnert.se 0.28% |1 | 0.39% |11854 | stefan.win...@restena.lu 0.28% |1 | 0.36% |10928 | jo...@iecc.com 0.28% |1 | 0.36% |10824 | r...@ipv.sx 0.28% |1 | 0.35% |10630 | cb.li...@gmail.com 0.28% |1 | 0.35% |10473 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 0.28% |1 | 0.34% |10363 | markzzzsm...@yahoo.com.au 0.28% |1 | 0.33% | 9898 | r.e.sonnev...@sonnection.nl 0.28% |1 | 0.31% | 9522 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.28% |1 | 0.29% | 8702 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.28% |1 | 0.29% | 8698 | anshumanpra...@gmail.com 0.28% |1 | 0.28% | 8635 | tb...@textuality.com 0.28% |1 | 0.27% | 8260 | alan.b.johns...@gmail.com 0.28% |1 | 0.27% | 8153 | vinay...@gmail.com 0.28% |1 | 0.27% | 8129 | lsav...@us.ibm.com 0.28% |1 | 0.25% | 7672 | jgu...@csc.com 0.28% |1 | 0.24% | 7229 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.28% |1 | 0.23% | 7118 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.28% |1 | 0.23% | 7061 | ferna...@gont.com.ar 0.28% |1 | 0.23% | 6866 | v6...@globis.net 0.28% |1 |
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 149 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 6 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.38% | 11 | 6.82% |81747 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 5.37% |8 | 4.69% |56229 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 4.70% |7 | 5.21% |62468 | hal...@gmail.com 4.70% |7 | 3.92% |46996 | john-i...@jck.com 4.03% |6 | 3.64% |43631 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 4.03% |6 | 3.42% |40977 | sc...@kitterman.com 2.01% |3 | 5.13% |61457 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 3.36% |5 | 3.71% |44471 | hsan...@isdg.net 4.03% |6 | 2.66% |31842 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 3.36% |5 | 2.91% |34919 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 3.36% |5 | 2.62% |31419 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.68% |4 | 3.01% |36091 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.68% |4 | 2.48% |29753 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 2.68% |4 | 2.40% |28798 | s...@sobco.com 2.68% |4 | 2.32% |27833 | barryle...@computer.org 2.68% |4 | 2.08% |24942 | scott.b...@gmail.com 2.01% |3 | 1.87% |22420 | s...@resistor.net 2.01% |3 | 1.86% |22324 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.34% |2 | 2.23% |26689 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 2.01% |3 | 1.48% |17790 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.34% |2 | 2.06% |24720 | lore...@google.com 1.34% |2 | 2.05% |24588 | t...@att.com 1.34% |2 | 1.88% |22482 | o...@nlnetlabs.nl 1.34% |2 | 1.87% |22376 | vinay...@gmail.com 1.34% |2 | 1.55% |18589 | superu...@gmail.com 1.34% |2 | 1.49% |17853 | s...@harvard.edu 1.34% |2 | 1.29% |15428 | esua...@fcaglp.fcaglp.unlp.edu.ar 1.34% |2 | 0.91% |10856 | p...@frobbit.se 1.34% |2 | 0.89% |10628 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 1.34% |2 | 0.86% |10280 | ra...@psg.com 0.67% |1 | 1.45% |17393 | agma...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 1.41% |16907 | david.bi...@orange.com 0.67% |1 | 1.13% |13509 | jmp...@cisco.com 0.67% |1 | 1.13% |13508 | michelle.cot...@icann.org 0.67% |1 | 1.04% |12503 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.67% |1 | 0.96% |11501 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.92% |10996 | mary.h.bar...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.82% | 9880 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.67% |1 | 0.69% | 8254 | schl...@theworld.com 0.67% |1 | 0.68% | 8156 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.67% |1 | 0.68% | 8139 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.67% |1 | 0.68% | 8134 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.68% | 8128 | afab...@hotmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.67% | 8055 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.67% |1 | 0.61% | 7368 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 0.67% |1 | 0.59% | 7091 | pe...@akayla.com 0.67% |1 | 0.58% | 6967 | lly...@civil-tongue.net 0.67% |1 | 0.57% | 6885 | g...@space.net 0.67% |1 | 0.55% | 6541 | william.mcc...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.54% | 6458 | martin.thom...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.50% | 5986 | jo...@taugh.com 0.67% |1 | 0.50% | 5949 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.67% |1 | 0.49% | 5851 | bra...@isi.edu 0.67% |1 | 0.48% | 5740 | tglas...@earthlink.net 0.67% |1 | 0.48% | 5737 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.67% |1 | 0.47% | 5667 | cy...@daboo.name 0.67% |1 | 0.47% | 5649 | d...@virtualized.org 0.67% |1 | 0.47% | 5646 | ch...@ietf.org 0.67% |1 | 0.41% | 4878 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 149 |100.00% | 1198072 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 140 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 30 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.43% |9 | 6.04% |76439 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 2.86% |4 | 7.42% |93857 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 4.29% |6 | 5.58% |70653 | ron.even@gmail.com 4.29% |6 | 5.11% |64709 | hal...@gmail.com 3.57% |5 | 4.80% |60784 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.29% |6 | 3.98% |50359 | hsan...@isdg.net 4.29% |6 | 3.42% |43301 | sc...@kitterman.com 4.29% |6 | 2.82% |35654 | s...@resistor.net 3.57% |5 | 2.72% |34437 | jo...@taugh.com 2.86% |4 | 3.23% |40931 | daedu...@btconnect.com 3.57% |5 | 2.46% |31093 | jelte.jan...@sidn.nl 2.86% |4 | 2.69% |34006 | john-i...@jck.com 2.86% |4 | 2.16% |27383 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.14% |3 | 2.14% |27092 | scott.b...@gmail.com 2.14% |3 | 2.02% |25568 | jgu...@csc.com 2.14% |3 | 1.71% |21592 | bmann...@isi.edu 2.14% |3 | 1.62% |20451 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.43% |2 | 2.13% |27011 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.43% |2 | 1.52% |19222 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 1.43% |2 | 1.46% |18515 | ma...@isc.org 1.43% |2 | 1.45% |18410 | l...@pi.nu 1.43% |2 | 1.45% |18341 | mach.c...@huawei.com 1.43% |2 | 1.35% |17077 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.43% |2 | 1.27% |16094 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 1.43% |2 | 1.20% |15192 | jordi.pa...@consulintel.es 1.43% |2 | 1.18% |14974 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.43% |2 | 1.13% |14252 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 1.37% |17324 | jouni.nos...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 1.31% |16603 | b...@nostrum.com 0.71% |1 | 1.26% |15924 | michelle.cot...@icann.org 0.71% |1 | 1.08% |13725 | sprom...@unina.it 0.71% |1 | 0.91% |11534 | mary.h.bar...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.90% |11408 | emcmu...@computer.org 0.71% |1 | 0.90% |11372 | bernard_ab...@hotmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.89% |11255 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.71% |1 | 0.85% |10702 | p...@frobbit.se 0.71% |1 | 0.83% |10452 | ero...@cisco.com 0.71% |1 | 0.70% | 8837 | sanjay.mis...@verizon.com 0.71% |1 | 0.69% | 8769 | hadriel.kap...@oracle.com 0.71% |1 | 0.69% | 8741 | sgund...@cisco.com 0.71% |1 | 0.66% | 8347 | aal...@blackberry.com 0.71% |1 | 0.65% | 8235 | shem_...@operamail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.64% | 8038 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 0.71% |1 | 0.62% | 7837 | ietf2d...@davearonson.com 0.71% |1 | 0.61% | 7772 | d...@cridland.net 0.71% |1 | 0.60% | 7554 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.60% | 7541 | superu...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.59% | 7523 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 0.71% |1 | 0.56% | 7027 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.71% |1 | 0.55% | 7016 | c...@it.uc3m.es 0.71% |1 | 0.55% | 6988 | g...@amsl.com 0.71% |1 | 0.55% | 6959 | bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com 0.71% |1 | 0.53% | 6701 | c...@tzi.org 0.71% |1 | 0.52% | 6598 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.71% |1 | 0.52% | 6563 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.71% |1 | 0.51% | 6516 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.51% | 6490 | damascene.joachimpil...@verizon.com 0.71% |1 | 0.51% | 6398 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.71% |1 | 0.50% | 6389 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.71% |1 | 0.48% | 6099 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.48% | 6070 | barryle...@computer.org 0.71% |1 | 0.46% | 5880 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.71% |1 | 0.46% | 5861 | swm...@swm.pp.se 0.71% |1 | 0.46% | 5798 | j...@jlc.net 0.71% |1 | 0.41% | 5152 | i...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 140 |100.00% | 1265395 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 272 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 23 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.88% | 16 | 5.06% | 118905 | d...@dcrocker.net 5.51% | 15 | 5.10% | 119919 | sc...@kitterman.com 4.78% | 13 | 4.71% | 110859 | hadriel.kap...@oracle.com 4.41% | 12 | 4.14% |97312 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 4.04% | 11 | 4.03% |94724 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 3.68% | 10 | 2.77% |65248 | p...@frobbit.se 2.94% |8 | 2.96% |69522 | john-i...@jck.com 3.31% |9 | 2.41% |56561 | jo...@taugh.com 2.94% |8 | 2.73% |64211 | ma...@isc.org 2.94% |8 | 2.65% |62387 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 2.57% |7 | 2.92% |68721 | superu...@gmail.com 2.94% |8 | 2.15% |50470 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 2.21% |6 | 2.42% |57003 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.57% |7 | 1.99% |46750 | to...@isi.edu 2.57% |7 | 1.96% |46054 | sust...@250bpm.com 2.21% |6 | 2.26% |53090 | hal...@gmail.com 1.84% |5 | 2.36% |55546 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.10% |3 | 2.99% |70357 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.21% |6 | 1.86% |43651 | s...@resistor.net 1.84% |5 | 1.67% |39285 | d...@virtualized.org 1.10% |3 | 2.37% |55685 | lionel.mor...@orange.com 1.47% |4 | 1.70% |40054 | jgu...@csc.com 1.10% |3 | 1.98% |46464 | stefan.win...@restena.lu 0.37% |1 | 2.41% |56657 | sgin...@amsl.com 1.10% |3 | 1.52% |35764 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.10% |3 | 1.26% |29653 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 1.10% |3 | 1.13% |26577 | l...@cisco.com 1.10% |3 | 1.03% |24218 | mo...@network-heretics.com 1.10% |3 | 0.93% |21961 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.10% |3 | 0.86% |20116 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.74% |2 | 1.03% |24151 | b...@nostrum.com 0.74% |2 | 0.86% |20259 | vinay...@gmail.com 0.74% |2 | 0.81% |19089 | morrowc.li...@gmail.com 0.74% |2 | 0.70% |16537 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.74% |2 | 0.68% |15909 | o...@ogud.com 0.37% |1 | 1.01% |23832 | zhangfa...@huawei.com 0.74% |2 | 0.64% |14977 | barryle...@computer.org 0.74% |2 | 0.63% |14901 | c...@tzi.org 0.74% |2 | 0.63% |14884 | jelte.jan...@sidn.nl 0.74% |2 | 0.58% |13716 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.37% |1 | 0.95% |22357 | car...@qosient.com 0.74% |2 | 0.56% |13284 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.74% |2 | 0.56% |13095 | h...@cs.columbia.edu 0.74% |2 | 0.55% |12920 | ka...@mit.edu 0.74% |2 | 0.54% |12636 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.37% |1 | 0.60% |14113 | flu...@cisco.com 0.37% |1 | 0.59% |13830 | g...@ninebynine.org 0.37% |1 | 0.53% |12564 | sant9...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.51% |11888 | lore...@google.com 0.37% |1 | 0.48% |11270 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.46% |10716 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.44% |10451 | petit...@acm.org 0.37% |1 | 0.44% |10329 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.37% |1 | 0.42% | 9832 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.37% |1 | 0.40% | 9429 | dotz...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.37% | 8698 | mbaug...@cisco.com 0.37% |1 | 0.36% | 8564 | turchanyi.g...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.36% | 8497 | t...@att.com 0.37% |1 | 0.36% | 8370 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.37% |1 | 0.35% | 8218 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.37% |1 | 0.34% | 8006 | aal...@blackberry.com 0.37% |1 | 0.33% | 7828 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 0.37% |1 | 0.33% | 7784 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 0.37% |1 | 0.32% | 7619 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.32% | 7531 | khalil.yac...@atecgrp.com 0.37% |1 | 0.30% | 7094 | hil...@cursive.net 0.37% |1 | 0.30% | 7084 | d...@dotat.at 0.37% |1 | 0.30% | 7083 | j...@jlc.net 0.37% |1 | 0.30% | 7049 | ietf...@comcast.net 0.37% |1 | 0.30% | 7013 | e...@google.com 0.37% |1 | 0.29% | 6800 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.29% | 6785 | n...@cryptonector.com 0.37% |1 | 0.29% | 6750 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.37% |1 | 0.28% | 6535 | aser...@lacnic.net 0.37% |1 | 0.28% | 6521 | berti...@bwijnen.net 0.37% |1 | 0.27% | 6460 | j...@apple.com 0.37% |1 | 0.27% | 6313 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.37% |1 | 0.27% | 6300 | o...@delong.com 0.37% |1 | 0.27% | 6295 | jh...@cmu.edu 0.37% |1 | 0.27% | 6260 | uma.chund...@ericsson.com 0.37% |1 | 0.26% | 6192 | masin...@adobe.com 0.37% |1 | 0.26% | 6050 | d...@xpasc.com 0.37% |1 | 0.25% | 5951 | bra...@isi.edu 0.37% |1 | 0.25% | 5920 | ves...@tana.it 0.37% |1 | 0.25% | 5833
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 125 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 16 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.20% |9 | 10.47% | 108804 | hal...@gmail.com 5.60% |7 | 8.58% |89136 | hadriel.kap...@oracle.com 7.20% |9 | 6.54% |67899 | ted.le...@nominum.com 6.40% |8 | 6.59% |68454 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 5.60% |7 | 5.04% |52375 | s...@resistor.net 4.00% |5 | 5.79% |60106 | har...@alvestrand.no 4.80% |6 | 3.58% |37229 | c...@tzi.org 3.20% |4 | 3.71% |38560 | g...@ninebynine.org 3.20% |4 | 2.97% |30814 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 3.20% |4 | 2.40% |24926 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.40% |3 | 2.02% |20970 | vinay...@gmail.com 1.60% |2 | 2.16% |22459 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.60% |2 | 2.07% |21464 | jgu...@csc.com 1.60% |2 | 1.77% |18417 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.60% |2 | 1.49% |15442 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.60% |2 | 1.48% |15334 | john-i...@jck.com 1.60% |2 | 1.36% |14092 | framefri...@gmail.com 1.60% |2 | 1.35% |13994 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 1.60% |2 | 1.32% |13756 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 1.60% |2 | 1.32% |13737 | a...@yumaworks.com 1.60% |2 | 1.28% |13320 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.60% |2 | 1.18% |12275 | jo...@taugh.com 1.60% |2 | 1.17% |12171 | j...@jlc.net 1.60% |2 | 1.12% |11671 | w...@mti-systems.com 1.60% |2 | 0.97% |10051 | sust...@250bpm.com 0.80% |1 | 1.36% |14152 | stephen.na...@ericsson.com 0.80% |1 | 1.15% |11950 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.80% |1 | 1.10% |11434 | tb...@textuality.com 0.80% |1 | 0.99% |10320 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.80% |1 | 0.86% | 8963 | barryle...@computer.org 0.80% |1 | 0.84% | 8692 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.80% |1 | 0.80% | 8285 | hartmans-ie...@mit.edu 0.80% |1 | 0.78% | 8141 | d...@cridland.net 0.80% |1 | 0.76% | 7889 | superu...@gmail.com 0.80% |1 | 0.73% | 7623 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.80% |1 | 0.73% | 7609 | hil...@cursive.net 0.80% |1 | 0.71% | 7373 | m...@mnot.net 0.80% |1 | 0.70% | 7301 | martin.thom...@gmail.com 0.80% |1 | 0.70% | 7228 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.80% |1 | 0.70% | 7223 | mo...@network-heretics.com 0.80% |1 | 0.68% | 7094 | l...@cisco.com 0.80% |1 | 0.68% | 7084 | tnad...@lucidvision.com 0.80% |1 | 0.66% | 6860 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.80% |1 | 0.64% | 6680 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.80% |1 | 0.63% | 6528 | sc...@kitterman.com 0.80% |1 | 0.62% | 6404 | d...@dotat.at 0.80% |1 | 0.61% | 6287 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.80% |1 | 0.60% | 6262 | j...@jck.com 0.80% |1 | 0.58% | 6073 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.80% |1 | 0.58% | 5999 | masin...@adobe.com 0.80% |1 | 0.55% | 5702 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.80% |1 | 0.53% | 5552 | i...@ietf.org 0.80% |1 | 0.53% | 5530 | pe...@akayla.com 0.80% |1 | 0.52% | 5401 | to...@isi.edu 0.80% |1 | 0.48% | 4980 | k...@bbn.com 0.80% |1 | 0.45% | 4704 | ra...@psg.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 125 |100.00% | 1038779 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 288 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 9 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.29% | 21 | 6.58% | 137704 | ted.le...@nominum.com 4.86% | 14 | 4.24% |88736 | scott.b...@gmail.com 4.51% | 13 | 3.79% |79279 | jo...@taugh.com 3.82% | 11 | 4.27% |89389 | hadriel.kap...@oracle.com 2.78% |8 | 4.66% |97597 | hal...@gmail.com 3.47% | 10 | 3.18% |66490 | mo...@network-heretics.com 3.12% |9 | 3.19% |66877 | john-i...@jck.com 2.43% |7 | 2.11% |44224 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.43% |7 | 1.97% |41295 | aaron.d...@cl.cam.ac.uk 2.08% |6 | 2.03% |42597 | jab...@hopcount.ca 1.74% |5 | 2.24% |46840 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.74% |5 | 2.17% |45393 | cgriffi...@gmail.com 1.74% |5 | 1.72% |36025 | s...@resistor.net 1.74% |5 | 1.55% |32513 | c...@tzi.org 1.74% |5 | 1.55% |32472 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.74% |5 | 1.54% |32264 | barryle...@computer.org 1.74% |5 | 1.42% |29701 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.39% |4 | 1.72% |35986 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.74% |5 | 1.34% |28087 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.04% |3 | 1.62% |33914 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 1.39% |4 | 1.26% |26452 | ulr...@herberg.name 1.39% |4 | 1.21% |25379 | h...@cs.columbia.edu 1.04% |3 | 1.41% |29477 | g...@algebras.org 1.04% |3 | 1.25% |26200 | mary.h.bar...@gmail.com 0.69% |2 | 1.49% |31154 | superu...@gmail.com 1.04% |3 | 1.13% |23755 | hil...@cursive.net 0.69% |2 | 1.37% |28593 | cntre...@gmail.com 1.04% |3 | 1.00% |20881 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.04% |3 | 0.98% |20456 | pait...@cisco.com 1.04% |3 | 0.94% |19716 | o...@cisco.com 1.04% |3 | 0.92% |19193 | m...@sandelman.ca 1.04% |3 | 0.89% |18567 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.04% |3 | 0.87% |18120 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.04% |3 | 0.86% |18025 | l...@netapp.com 1.04% |3 | 0.86% |18017 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.04% |3 | 0.85% |17892 | joe...@bogus.com 0.69% |2 | 0.84% |17550 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.69% |2 | 0.82% |17211 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.69% |2 | 0.81% |16966 | huit...@microsoft.com 0.69% |2 | 0.77% |16166 | andr...@plixer.com 0.69% |2 | 0.74% |15583 | grm...@gmail.com 0.69% |2 | 0.73% |15295 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.69% |2 | 0.71% |14909 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.69% |2 | 0.71% |14817 | o...@nlnetlabs.nl 0.69% |2 | 0.69% |14423 | petit...@acm.org 0.69% |2 | 0.69% |14359 | james.h.man...@team.telstra.com 0.69% |2 | 0.64% |13368 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.69% |2 | 0.63% |13122 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.69% |2 | 0.58% |12238 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.69% |2 | 0.58% |12064 | h...@shrubbery.net 0.69% |2 | 0.56% |11702 | glenn.d...@nbcuni.com 0.69% |2 | 0.55% |11585 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 0.69% |2 | 0.54% |11318 | o...@edvina.net 0.69% |2 | 0.49% |10285 | m...@sap.com 0.35% |1 | 0.82% |17173 | cpign...@cisco.com 0.69% |2 | 0.47% | 9886 | ra...@psg.com 0.69% |2 | 0.43% | 8965 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.35% |1 | 0.60% |12460 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.49% |10339 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.35% |1 | 0.48% | 9952 | jmp...@cisco.com 0.35% |1 | 0.45% | 9462 | uyesh...@ifa.hawaii.edu 0.35% |1 | 0.45% | 9364 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 0.35% |1 | 0.45% | 9336 | rog...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.45% | 9333 | l...@cisco.com 0.35% |1 | 0.45% | 9330 | gjs...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.44% | 9299 | d...@cridland.net 0.35% |1 | 0.42% | 8862 | cgriffi...@dyn.com 0.35% |1 | 0.41% | 8603 | ma...@isc.org 0.35% |1 | 0.41% | 8490 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.40% | 8304 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.35% |1 | 0.37% | 7831 | b...@brianrosen.net 0.35% |1 | 0.37% | 7734 | aal...@blackberry.com 0.35% |1 | 0.36% | 7615 | jgu...@csc.com 0.35% |1 | 0.36% | 7582 | tobias.gond...@gondrom.org 0.35% |1 | 0.36% | 7517 | y...@isoc.org 0.35% |1 | 0.35% | 7345 | chell...@pobox.com 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7092 | l...@pi.nu 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7090 | listse...@me.com 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7056 | jcur...@istaff.org 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7056 | iana-questi...@iana.org 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7035 | t...@att.com 0.35% |1 | 0.33% | 7011 | rg+i...@qualcomm.com 0.35% |1 | 0.32% | 6788 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 0.35% |1 | 0.31% | 6483 | sprom...@unina.it 0.35% |1 |
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
I agree with you John, I also not objecting it but wanted more meaning into the report when I receive it, as I suggested before for clarifications. I don't think majority in IETF think it is meaningless so that is why I want to clarify the meaning and discuss what most may not want to discuss. If this was already discussed could some one point me to a discussion about a weekly post that is done for long and which it may be meaningless by some and understoond the meaning by others. I will add that the report can be misleading, and that I have no intention to write a code for something that is not IETF procedure, but I have intention to clarify such message received each week in IETF that has a lack of information or meaning agreed on. AB On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 9:55 PM, John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com wrote: --On Sunday, August 04, 2013 19:53 + John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote: If there is a serious drive to discontinue the weekly posting summary - I strongly object. As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks it's fine. I do not want to be recorded as thinking it is fine. If nothing else, I think was is being reported is meaningless statistically (which doesn't mean people can't find value in it). However, I do not object to its being posted as long as it isn't used to justify personal attacks on individuals for their ranking. It seems to me that isn't quite what you said, rough consensus or not. best, john
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
If one or two people are doing most of the posting to a list, that means something is out of balance. Summary statistics can be used as an indicator that something should be done to encourage diversity, or get people back on topic, etc.
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
On Aug 5, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with you John, I also not objecting it but wanted more meaning into the report when I receive it, as I suggested before for clarifications. It's just a weekly posting summary of raw stats - it's not a ranking system, popularity contest, or twitter trending list. It's not important, and doesn't matter. Lots of people have been at the top of that list, and we didn't get a reward or rebuke. Even if the summary script was stopped, people who care can generate their own. What's more important is the content quality of the emails, and no automated script can measure that (except for ones the NSA has I guess). I don't think majority in IETF think it is meaningless so that is why I want to clarify the meaning and discuss what most may not want to discuss. Dude, the majority of the IETF probably thinks this entire mailing list is meaningless. -hadriel
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
On 3 Aug 2013 11:14, Ole Jacobsen (ole) o...@cisco.com wrote: It was never a distraction until AB started complaining about it. Been serving a useful purpose for many, many years. Procmail is your friend. +1 for that --- Roger --- Ole J. Jacobsen Editor Publisher http://cisco.com/ipj Sent from my iPhone On Aug 3, 2013, at 9:12, Heasley h...@shrubbery.net wrote: Am Aug 3, 2013 um 9:05 schrieb Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com: On 8/3/13, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote: On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com wrote: I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5 in each week). However, in my comment below I will follow the week as done in world calender, start from Sunday (mornings) and ends on Saturday (nights). The day a week starts, and what days are working days in a week, differs between cultures. Many have Sunday-Thursday as working days. Many have Monday as the first day of the week. I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday (read what i I suggest eliminating the report. As it doesn't measure content quality, one's contribution can't be measured by the email they produce. So, it is only a guage of the distraction they produce. The report itself is a distraction.
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
All, If there is a serious drive to discontinue the weekly posting summary - I strongly object. I don't think its main benefit is be to stop excessive or of topic posting. I'm not saying that list managers and list owners should look at that aspect. At least for me it serves as a safety net where I can look if I missed anything and need to go back and look. /Loa On 2013-08-04 10:31, Roger Jørgensen wrote: On 3 Aug 2013 11:14, Ole Jacobsen (ole) o...@cisco.com mailto:o...@cisco.com wrote: It was never a distraction until AB started complaining about it. Been serving a useful purpose for many, many years. Procmail is your friend. +1 for that --- Roger --- Ole J. Jacobsen Editor Publisher http://cisco.com/ipj Sent from my iPhone On Aug 3, 2013, at 9:12, Heasley h...@shrubbery.net mailto:h...@shrubbery.net wrote: Am Aug 3, 2013 um 9:05 schrieb Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com mailto:abdussalambar...@gmail.com: On 8/3/13, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se mailto:p...@frobbit.se wrote: On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com mailto:abdussalambar...@gmail.com wrote: I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5 in each week). However, in my comment below I will follow the week as done in world calender, start from Sunday (mornings) and ends on Saturday (nights). The day a week starts, and what days are working days in a week, differs between cultures. Many have Sunday-Thursday as working days. Many have Monday as the first day of the week. I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday (read what i I suggest eliminating the report. As it doesn't measure content quality, one's contribution can't be measured by the email they produce. So, it is only a guage of the distraction they produce. The report itself is a distraction. -- Loa Anderssonemail: l...@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert l...@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
If there is a serious drive to discontinue the weekly posting summary - I strongly object. As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks it's fine. Seems like rough consensus to me. R's, John
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
On 8/4/13 11:53 AM, John Levine wrote: As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks it's fine. More to the point, the objections that are being raised appear to be bogus and based in a misunderstanding of how the IETF operates. Melinda
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
On 04/08/13 20:53, John Levine wrote: If there is a serious drive to discontinue the weekly posting summary - I strongly object. As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks it's fine. Seems like rough consensus to me. +1 Aaron R's, John
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
On 4 Aug 2013, at 20:53, John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote: If there is a serious drive to discontinue the weekly posting summary - I strongly object. As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks it's fine. Seems like rough consensus to me. And the code is running… Tim
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
--On Sunday, August 04, 2013 19:53 + John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote: If there is a serious drive to discontinue the weekly posting summary - I strongly object. As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks it's fine. I do not want to be recorded as thinking it is fine. If nothing else, I think was is being reported is meaningless statistically (which doesn't mean people can't find value in it). However, I do not object to its being posted as long as it isn't used to justify personal attacks on individuals for their ranking. It seems to me that isn't quite what you said, rough consensus or not. best, john
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
First, I'd like to highlight something that is important. There is no inherent preference to posting a lot, a moderate amount, or none at all. Everything depends on context. If you are providing useful input and furthering the discussion, a lot of mails is ok. And no mails can be a problem, too, if you were supposed to participate, such as when you are an author of a document on the topic. For instance, when I look at Thomas' report, if I don't appear there I probably should have paid more attention. In other words, you should not look at how much people post on lists alone… and no matter what you post, please be considerate of other people, avoid repetition, stay on topic, etc. Secondly, don't we have better things to do than to argue about e-mail list summary reports? Several people find them useful. I'm sure there is something in the Internet that still needs fixing :-) Jari
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Hi Thomas, Please note that the week did not end yet (IMO ends on Saturday night) but your week is starting from Friday and end on Thursday night. If we follow your week then I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5 in each week). However, in my comment below I will follow the week as done in world calender, start from Sunday (mornings) and ends on Saturday (nights). In the last previous weeks IETF got 135, 140, and 109 messages, for weeks 28, 29, and 30 respectively. The week 31 as below got 222 messages because it is the IETF meeting week in Berline. I expected to get lower input from attendees and higher from remote, because attendees are available at meetings. My input increased as you reported (but percentage per total is still similar), because of the meeting and I am remote, to communicate with attended participants. However, I will try to check my input per month not per week so I can adjust my particpation volume on the list, because on week 30 I had no input. Please note that this respond is related to you reporting my and others participation activity, which I will do frequently to comment/discuss on such report. AB + 2013 WEEK 28 +++ http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg80637.html + 2013 WEEK 29 +++ http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg80774.html + 2013 WEEK 30 +++ http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg80883.html + 2013 WEEK 31 +++ On 8/2/13, Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com wrote: Total of 222 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 2 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.95% | 11 | 7.45% | 129461 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 5.41% | 12 | 6.26% | 108812 | mo...@network-heretics.com 4.95% | 11 | 4.51% |78362 | s...@resistor.net 4.50% | 10 | 4.72% |82029 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.60% |8 | 5.15% |89569 | hal...@gmail.com 4.05% |9 | 3.58% |62145 | john-i...@jck.com 4.05% |9 | 3.54% |61529 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 4.05% |9 | 3.39% |58959 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.60% |8 | 2.83% |49207 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.80% |4 | 3.79% |65923 | leaf.yeh@gmail.com 3.15% |7 | 2.10% |36449 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 2.70% |6 | 2.50% |43444 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.70% |6 | 2.05% |35661 | stpe...@stpeter.im 2.25% |5 | 2.01% |34917 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.25% |5 | 1.87% |32418 | barryle...@computer.org 1.80% |4 | 2.25% |39049 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 1.35% |3 | 2.36% |41081 | sprom...@unina.it 1.80% |4 | 1.87% |32564 | a...@yumaworks.com 1.80% |4 | 1.65% |28732 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.80% |4 | 1.50% |26028 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.80% |4 | 1.45% |25184 | aaron.d...@cl.cam.ac.uk 1.35% |3 | 1.38% |24049 | ch...@ietf.org 1.35% |3 | 1.34% |23348 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 1.35% |3 | 1.16% |20126 | roland.bl...@kit.edu 1.35% |3 | 1.15% |19939 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 1.35% |3 | 1.12% |19406 | joe...@bogus.com 1.35% |3 | 1.09% |19009 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.35% |3 | 0.96% |16709 | to...@isi.edu 0.90% |2 | 0.99% |17194 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.90% |2 | 0.93% |16233 | petit...@acm.org 0.90% |2 | 0.85% |14812 | amor...@amsl.com 0.90% |2 | 0.82% |14280 | jcur...@istaff.org 0.90% |2 | 0.80% |13957 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 0.90% |2 | 0.77% |13418 | da...@tcb.net 0.90% |2 | 0.71% |12262 | josh.howl...@ja.net 0.90% |2 | 0.66% |11396 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.90% |2 | 0.64% |11075 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 0.90% |2 | 0.59% |10336 | ra...@psg.com 0.90% |2 | 0.56% | 9647 | i...@meetecho.com 0.45% |1 | 0.93% |16123 | nkuk...@verilan.com 0.45% |1 | 0.85% |14714 | jsalo...@cisco.com 0.45% |1 | 0.81% |14144 | andrewm...@google.com 0.45% |1 | 0.66% |11498 | amanda.ba...@icann.org 0.45% |1 | 0.62% |10744 | mary.h.bar...@gmail.com 0.45% |1 | 0.59% |10318 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.45% |1 | 0.55% | 9616 | d...@cridland.net 0.45% |1 | 0.54% | 9392 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.45% |1 | 0.50% | 8729 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.45% |1 | 0.50% | 8686 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.45% |1 | 0.47% | 8238 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.45% |1 | 0.46% | 7965 | br...@innovationslab.net 0.45% |1 | 0.46% | 7918 | kvi...@broadcom.com 0.45% |1 | 0.45% | 7905 | simon.lei...@switch.ch 0.45% |1 |
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com wrote: However, in my comment below I will follow the week as done in world calender, start from Sunday (mornings) and ends on Saturday (nights). The day a week starts, and what days are working days in a week, differs between cultures. Many have Sunday-Thursday as working days. Many have Monday as the first day of the week. There is not *one* definition of when a week start and end. Patrik
The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
On 8/3/13, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote: On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com wrote: I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5 in each week). However, in my comment below I will follow the week as done in world calender, start from Sunday (mornings) and ends on Saturday (nights). The day a week starts, and what days are working days in a week, differs between cultures. Many have Sunday-Thursday as working days. Many have Monday as the first day of the week. I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday (read what i prefered done above) to include both Sun-Thur and Mon-Fri working days, so all can see the result of working days in IETF. There is not *one* definition of when a week start and end. I have worked both (Sun-Thur) and (Mon-Fri), my definition never matters, it is the definition of the organisation we work for that matters. So is there a definition in IETF or does Thomas have a definition or it was selected randomly morning of Friday. AB Patrik
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
Am Aug 3, 2013 um 9:05 schrieb Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com: On 8/3/13, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote: On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com wrote: I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5 in each week). However, in my comment below I will follow the week as done in world calender, start from Sunday (mornings) and ends on Saturday (nights). The day a week starts, and what days are working days in a week, differs between cultures. Many have Sunday-Thursday as working days. Many have Monday as the first day of the week. I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday (read what i I suggest eliminating the report. As it doesn't measure content quality, one's contribution can't be measured by the email they produce. So, it is only a guage of the distraction they produce. The report itself is a distraction.
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
Hi, I don't care if this report is published or not, but I will point out that the 1 week sample period is not that useful if the intent is to spot excessive posting. Somebody could be following up on 1 thread, and not post again for a year. Somebody could be participating in an IETF Last Call discussion, which should not even count as extra since that is a critical part of our review process. Andy On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Heasley h...@shrubbery.net wrote: Am Aug 3, 2013 um 9:05 schrieb Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com: On 8/3/13, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote: On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com wrote: I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5 in each week). However, in my comment below I will follow the week as done in world calender, start from Sunday (mornings) and ends on Saturday (nights). The day a week starts, and what days are working days in a week, differs between cultures. Many have Sunday-Thursday as working days. Many have Monday as the first day of the week. I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday (read what i I suggest eliminating the report. As it doesn't measure content quality, one's contribution can't be measured by the email they produce. So, it is only a guage of the distraction they produce. The report itself is a distraction.
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
It was never a distraction until AB started complaining about it. Been serving a useful purpose for many, many years. Procmail is your friend. Ole J. Jacobsen Editor Publisher http://cisco.com/ipj Sent from my iPhone On Aug 3, 2013, at 9:12, Heasley h...@shrubbery.net wrote: Am Aug 3, 2013 um 9:05 schrieb Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com: On 8/3/13, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote: On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com wrote: I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5 in each week). However, in my comment below I will follow the week as done in world calender, start from Sunday (mornings) and ends on Saturday (nights). The day a week starts, and what days are working days in a week, differs between cultures. Many have Sunday-Thursday as working days. Many have Monday as the first day of the week. I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday (read what i I suggest eliminating the report. As it doesn't measure content quality, one's contribution can't be measured by the email they produce. So, it is only a guage of the distraction they produce. The report itself is a distraction.
RE: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5 in each week). There are seven days in most weeks, in my experience. I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday I suggest that anyone who wants something different simply writes code for something different. I suggest eliminating the report. As it doesn't measure content quality, one's contribution can't be measured by the email they produce. So, it is only a guage of the distraction they produce. The report itself is a distraction. = Have you considered not reading it? Adrian
Re: [IETF] RE: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
On Aug 3, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Adrian Farrel adr...@olddog.co.uk wrote: I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5 in each week). There are seven days in most weeks, in my experience. I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday I suggest that anyone who wants something different simply writes code for something different. I suggest eliminating the report. As it doesn't measure content quality, one's contribution can't be measured by the email they produce. So, it is only a guage of the distraction they produce. The report itself is a distraction. = Have you considered not reading it? Or, better yet, not appearing prominently on it? W Adrian -- Don't be impressed with unintelligible stuff said condescendingly. -- Radia Perlman.
Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
On 08/03/13 05:48, Adrian Farrel allegedly wrote: Have you considered not reading it? +1. Especially during IETF week, people on various lists are losing track of their delete key, or the ability to set mail filter rules.
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 222 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 2 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.95% | 11 | 7.45% | 129461 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 5.41% | 12 | 6.26% | 108812 | mo...@network-heretics.com 4.95% | 11 | 4.51% |78362 | s...@resistor.net 4.50% | 10 | 4.72% |82029 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.60% |8 | 5.15% |89569 | hal...@gmail.com 4.05% |9 | 3.58% |62145 | john-i...@jck.com 4.05% |9 | 3.54% |61529 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 4.05% |9 | 3.39% |58959 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.60% |8 | 2.83% |49207 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.80% |4 | 3.79% |65923 | leaf.yeh@gmail.com 3.15% |7 | 2.10% |36449 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 2.70% |6 | 2.50% |43444 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.70% |6 | 2.05% |35661 | stpe...@stpeter.im 2.25% |5 | 2.01% |34917 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.25% |5 | 1.87% |32418 | barryle...@computer.org 1.80% |4 | 2.25% |39049 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 1.35% |3 | 2.36% |41081 | sprom...@unina.it 1.80% |4 | 1.87% |32564 | a...@yumaworks.com 1.80% |4 | 1.65% |28732 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.80% |4 | 1.50% |26028 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.80% |4 | 1.45% |25184 | aaron.d...@cl.cam.ac.uk 1.35% |3 | 1.38% |24049 | ch...@ietf.org 1.35% |3 | 1.34% |23348 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 1.35% |3 | 1.16% |20126 | roland.bl...@kit.edu 1.35% |3 | 1.15% |19939 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 1.35% |3 | 1.12% |19406 | joe...@bogus.com 1.35% |3 | 1.09% |19009 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.35% |3 | 0.96% |16709 | to...@isi.edu 0.90% |2 | 0.99% |17194 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.90% |2 | 0.93% |16233 | petit...@acm.org 0.90% |2 | 0.85% |14812 | amor...@amsl.com 0.90% |2 | 0.82% |14280 | jcur...@istaff.org 0.90% |2 | 0.80% |13957 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 0.90% |2 | 0.77% |13418 | da...@tcb.net 0.90% |2 | 0.71% |12262 | josh.howl...@ja.net 0.90% |2 | 0.66% |11396 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.90% |2 | 0.64% |11075 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 0.90% |2 | 0.59% |10336 | ra...@psg.com 0.90% |2 | 0.56% | 9647 | i...@meetecho.com 0.45% |1 | 0.93% |16123 | nkuk...@verilan.com 0.45% |1 | 0.85% |14714 | jsalo...@cisco.com 0.45% |1 | 0.81% |14144 | andrewm...@google.com 0.45% |1 | 0.66% |11498 | amanda.ba...@icann.org 0.45% |1 | 0.62% |10744 | mary.h.bar...@gmail.com 0.45% |1 | 0.59% |10318 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.45% |1 | 0.55% | 9616 | d...@cridland.net 0.45% |1 | 0.54% | 9392 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.45% |1 | 0.50% | 8729 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.45% |1 | 0.50% | 8686 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.45% |1 | 0.47% | 8238 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.45% |1 | 0.46% | 7965 | br...@innovationslab.net 0.45% |1 | 0.46% | 7918 | kvi...@broadcom.com 0.45% |1 | 0.45% | 7905 | simon.lei...@switch.ch 0.45% |1 | 0.45% | 7825 | flu...@cisco.com 0.45% |1 | 0.45% | 7808 | m...@ripe.net 0.45% |1 | 0.43% | 7535 | bcla...@cisco.com 0.45% |1 | 0.43% | 7507 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.45% |1 | 0.43% | 7493 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.45% |1 | 0.42% | 7376 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 0.45% |1 | 0.42% | 7233 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.45% |1 | 0.40% | 7035 | gsalg...@cisco.com 0.45% |1 | 0.40% | 7005 | z...@sensinode.com 0.45% |1 | 0.39% | 6692 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.45% |1 | 0.37% | 6450 | ma...@isc.org 0.45% |1 | 0.37% | 6370 | jo...@taugh.com 0.45% |1 | 0.36% | 6308 | pe...@akayla.com 0.45% |1 | 0.34% | 5940 | lore...@meetecho.com 0.45% |1 | 0.34% | 5865 | ietf2d...@davearonson.com 0.45% |1 | 0.34% | 5864 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.45% |1 | 0.33% | 5797 | st...@shinkuro.com 0.45% |1 | 0.33% | 5733 | tterr...@xiph.org 0.45% |1 | 0.32% | 5593 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.45% |1 | 0.30% | 5262 | bra...@isi.edu 0.45% |1 | 0.30% | 5180 | jh...@cmu.edu 0.45% |1 | 0.29% | 5035 | adr...@olddog.co.uk +--++--+ 100.00% | 222 |100.00% | 1737615 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 109 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 26 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 13.76% | 15 | 21.67% | 210921 | aal...@blackberry.com 9.17% | 10 | 12.47% | 121366 | tb...@textuality.com 8.26% |9 | 5.89% |57325 | john-i...@jck.com 5.50% |6 | 4.62% |44943 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 5.50% |6 | 3.65% |35534 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 4.59% |5 | 3.33% |32388 | scott.b...@gmail.com 3.67% |4 | 2.80% |27207 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.67% |4 | 2.55% |24814 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.75% |3 | 2.30% |22369 | s...@resistor.net 2.75% |3 | 1.93% |18799 | martin.thom...@gmail.com 1.83% |2 | 2.54% |24758 | christer.holmb...@ericsson.com 0.92% |1 | 3.11% |30309 | kewi...@gmail.com 1.83% |2 | 1.92% |18643 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.83% |2 | 1.89% |18402 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 1.83% |2 | 1.53% |14864 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.83% |2 | 1.48% |14368 | barryle...@computer.org 1.83% |2 | 1.34% |13036 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.83% |2 | 1.09% |10638 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.83% |2 | 1.08% |10477 | ra...@psg.com 0.92% |1 | 1.35% |13094 | stefan.win...@restena.lu 0.92% |1 | 1.24% |12041 | f...@cisco.com 0.92% |1 | 1.20% |11680 | b...@nostrum.com 0.92% |1 | 1.11% |10772 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.92% |1 | 1.01% | 9859 | jgu...@csc.com 0.92% |1 | 1.01% | 9791 | flu...@cisco.com 0.92% |1 | 1.01% | 9790 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.92% |1 | 0.99% | 9631 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.92% |1 | 0.97% | 9427 | ch...@ietf.org 0.92% |1 | 0.94% | 9194 | jsalo...@cisco.com 0.92% |1 | 0.92% | 8995 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.92% |1 | 0.86% | 8343 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.92% |1 | 0.82% | 7966 | eric.g...@ericsson.com 0.92% |1 | 0.82% | 7933 | josh.howl...@ja.net 0.92% |1 | 0.80% | 7752 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.92% |1 | 0.79% | 7722 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 0.92% |1 | 0.78% | 7598 | br...@innovationslab.net 0.92% |1 | 0.72% | 7008 | ted.le...@nominum.com 0.92% |1 | 0.68% | 6631 | zehn@gmail.com 0.92% |1 | 0.68% | 6610 | joe...@bogus.com 0.92% |1 | 0.64% | 6216 | d...@1-4-5.net 0.92% |1 | 0.62% | 6060 | garbak...@gmail.com 0.92% |1 | 0.59% | 5790 | simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca 0.92% |1 | 0.59% | 5731 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.92% |1 | 0.58% | 5663 | tterr...@xiph.org 0.92% |1 | 0.58% | 5617 | f...@isoc.org 0.92% |1 | 0.52% | 5085 | j...@jck.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 109 |100.00% | 973160 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 140 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 19 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.71% |8 | 8.08% |97324 | hal...@gmail.com 6.43% |9 | 6.96% |83850 | denghu...@gmail.com 4.29% |6 | 4.53% |54622 | stefan.win...@restena.lu 3.57% |5 | 4.57% |55051 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.57% |5 | 4.25% |51253 | bernard_ab...@hotmail.com 2.86% |4 | 4.62% |55730 | mary.h.bar...@gmail.com 3.57% |5 | 3.02% |36363 | john-i...@jck.com 3.57% |5 | 2.92% |35224 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.14% |3 | 4.28% |51567 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.86% |4 | 2.49% |29961 | p...@nohats.ca 2.86% |4 | 2.42% |29197 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.86% |4 | 2.41% |29071 | jo...@taugh.com 2.86% |4 | 2.39% |28792 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 2.86% |4 | 2.30% |27727 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 2.86% |4 | 1.98% |23903 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.14% |3 | 1.90% |22957 | do...@dougbarton.us 2.14% |3 | 1.54% |18617 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.43% |2 | 1.93% |23242 | ya...@cnnic.cn 2.14% |3 | 1.20% |14449 | ra...@psg.com 1.43% |2 | 1.76% |21270 | sanjay.mis...@verizon.com 1.43% |2 | 1.63% |19615 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.43% |2 | 1.54% |18571 | mo...@network-heretics.com 1.43% |2 | 1.32% |15922 | jason_living...@cable.comcast.com 1.43% |2 | 1.29% |15570 | b...@nostrum.com 1.43% |2 | 1.29% |15566 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 1.43% |2 | 1.12% |13496 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.43% |2 | 1.04% |12564 | c...@a.org 1.43% |2 | 0.90% |10822 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.43% |2 | 0.84% |10168 | ietf-secretar...@ietf.org 0.71% |1 | 1.17% |14159 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 1.09% |13117 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.71% |1 | 1.08% |13018 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 1.00% |12082 | s...@resistor.net 0.71% |1 | 0.99% |11935 | afab...@hotmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.86% |10393 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.71% |1 | 0.84% |10151 | joseph@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.77% | 9267 | bdick...@verisign.com 0.71% |1 | 0.76% | 9199 | ma...@isc.org 0.71% |1 | 0.74% | 8911 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.71% |1 | 0.72% | 8624 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.71% |1 | 0.67% | 8033 | p...@frobbit.se 0.71% |1 | 0.66% | 7910 | margaret...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.65% | 7858 | me...@globetel.com.ph 0.71% |1 | 0.65% | 7792 | pait...@cisco.com 0.71% |1 | 0.63% | 7594 | ebur...@standardstrack.com 0.71% |1 | 0.62% | 7504 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.62% | 7428 | ptha...@broadcom.com 0.71% |1 | 0.61% | 7345 | t...@dropfuse.com 0.71% |1 | 0.59% | 7124 | s...@harvard.edu 0.71% |1 | 0.59% | 7109 | war...@kumari.net 0.71% |1 | 0.58% | 6934 | zehn@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.57% | 6874 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 0.71% |1 | 0.55% | 6656 | ferna...@gont.com.ar 0.71% |1 | 0.55% | 6603 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.71% |1 | 0.54% | 6560 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.54% | 6450 | o...@gih.com 0.71% |1 | 0.52% | 6322 | due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp 0.71% |1 | 0.50% | 6028 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.71% |1 | 0.49% | 5936 | fa...@isi.edu 0.71% |1 | 0.48% | 5815 | ch...@ietf.org 0.71% |1 | 0.46% | 5598 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.71% |1 | 0.46% | 5568 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 0.71% |1 | 0.46% | 5491 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 0.71% |1 | 0.44% | 5301 | a...@hxr.us +--++--+ 100.00% | 140 |100.00% | 1205153 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 135 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 12 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.19% |7 | 5.14% |54819 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 5.19% |7 | 4.23% |45126 | john-i...@jck.com 4.44% |6 | 3.52% |37475 | mo...@network-heretics.com 2.96% |4 | 3.70% |39453 | denghu...@gmail.com 3.70% |5 | 2.87% |30590 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.96% |4 | 2.96% |31531 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 4.84% |51543 | communicat...@edox.com 2.96% |4 | 2.61% |27819 | d3e...@gmail.com 2.96% |4 | 2.48% |26411 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 2.96% |4 | 2.46% |26176 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.96% |4 | 2.33% |24811 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 2.22% |3 | 2.50% |26695 | pe...@akayla.com 1.48% |2 | 2.96% |31597 | sprom...@unina.it 2.22% |3 | 2.09% |22285 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 2.22% |3 | 1.83% |19504 | zehn@gmail.com 2.22% |3 | 1.82% |19399 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.48% |2 | 2.53% |26980 | step...@sprunk.org 1.48% |2 | 2.27% |24163 | liushuch...@huawei.com 2.22% |3 | 1.45% |15415 | simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca 2.22% |3 | 1.36% |14508 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.48% |2 | 1.33% |14213 | b...@nostrum.com 0.74% |1 | 1.96% |20916 | allison.man...@gmail.com 1.48% |2 | 1.19% |12664 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.48% |2 | 1.16% |12389 | s...@harvard.edu 1.48% |2 | 1.16% |12317 | cy...@daboo.name 1.48% |2 | 1.13% |12080 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 1.87% |19971 | ch...@ietf.org 1.48% |2 | 1.10% |11729 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.74% |1 | 1.66% |17648 | victor.zhong...@huawei.com 0.74% |1 | 1.07% |11398 | joseph@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.96% |10235 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.74% |1 | 0.95% |10138 | superu...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.94% |10061 | ida_le...@yahoo.com 0.74% |1 | 0.94% | 9998 | skar...@science.alquds.edu 0.74% |1 | 0.89% | 9524 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.74% |1 | 0.88% | 9327 | mkaus...@us.ibm.com 0.74% |1 | 0.86% | 9132 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.83% | 8839 | hal...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.82% | 8735 | s...@resistor.net 0.74% |1 | 0.81% | 8615 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 0.74% |1 | 0.78% | 8319 | aal...@blackberry.com 0.74% |1 | 0.74% | 7885 | mthor...@adobe.com 0.74% |1 | 0.74% | 7836 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.72% | 7684 | dmb...@us.ibm.com 0.74% |1 | 0.71% | 7603 | loja...@cisco.com 0.74% |1 | 0.71% | 7520 | akat...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.70% | 7501 | ptha...@broadcom.com 0.74% |1 | 0.70% | 7416 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.74% |1 | 0.69% | 7384 | t...@dropfuse.com 0.74% |1 | 0.69% | 7331 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.74% |1 | 0.69% | 7319 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 0.74% |1 | 0.68% | 7280 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 0.74% |1 | 0.66% | 7053 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.74% |1 | 0.66% | 7052 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.74% |1 | 0.64% | 6803 | swm...@swm.pp.se 0.74% |1 | 0.64% | 6775 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.63% | 6767 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.74% |1 | 0.63% | 6716 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.74% |1 | 0.61% | 6507 | amor...@amsl.com 0.74% |1 | 0.59% | 6332 | o...@cisco.com 0.74% |1 | 0.58% | 6225 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.74% |1 | 0.58% | 6171 | josh.howl...@ja.net 0.74% |1 | 0.58% | 6161 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.56% | 5970 | joe...@bogus.com 0.74% |1 | 0.55% | 5855 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.74% |1 | 0.55% | 5810 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.74% |1 | 0.54% | 5764 | j...@jck.com 0.74% |1 | 0.54% | 5751 | ra...@psg.com 0.74% |1 | 0.53% | 5640 | pait...@cisco.com 0.74% |1 | 0.53% | 5605 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.74% |1 | 0.52% | 5513 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.74% |1 | 0.50% | 5332 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.74% |1 | 0.48% | 5096 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.74% |1 | 0.45% | 4798 | p...@frobbit.se 0.74% |1 | 0.45% | 4752 | age...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 135 |100.00% | 1065755 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 92 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jul 5 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.35% |4 | 4.01% |25872 | john-i...@jck.com 4.35% |4 | 3.77% |24329 | m...@sap.com 4.35% |4 | 3.72% |24024 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.26% |3 | 4.36% |28144 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 3.26% |3 | 3.76% |24231 | d3e...@gmail.com 3.26% |3 | 3.44% |22163 | war...@kumari.net 3.26% |3 | 3.00% |19334 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 3.26% |3 | 2.80% |18070 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.26% |3 | 2.65% |17087 | jo...@taugh.com 2.17% |2 | 3.20% |20669 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 3.26% |3 | 2.03% |13113 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 2.17% |2 | 2.41% |15515 | michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de 2.17% |2 | 2.29% |14782 | nomcom-chair-2...@ietf.org 2.17% |2 | 2.19% |14143 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 2.17% |2 | 2.06% |13293 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.17% |2 | 2.02% |13006 | mstjo...@comcast.net 2.17% |2 | 1.95% |12611 | scott.b...@gmail.com 2.17% |2 | 1.83% |11808 | descom...@lpsc.in2p3.fr 2.17% |2 | 1.78% |11464 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 2.17% |2 | 1.71% |11056 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.09% |1 | 2.35% |15138 | hal...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 2.31% |14906 | rex_corpuz2...@yahoo.com 1.09% |1 | 2.04% |13179 | ron.even@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.72% |11083 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.62% |10449 | rbon...@juniper.net 1.09% |1 | 1.55% |10013 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.09% |1 | 1.37% | 8834 | michael_oreir...@cable.comcast.com 1.09% |1 | 1.35% | 8735 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.26% | 8150 | t...@att.com 1.09% |1 | 1.23% | 7921 | framefri...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.21% | 7781 | s...@resistor.net 1.09% |1 | 1.20% | 7761 | eck...@cisco.com 1.09% |1 | 1.20% | 7713 | r...@ipv.sx 1.09% |1 | 1.18% | 7620 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.09% |1 | 1.17% | 7562 | jab...@hopcount.ca 1.09% |1 | 1.17% | 7518 | j...@wide.ad.jp 1.09% |1 | 1.15% | 7407 | mike5...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.12% | 7225 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.09% |1 | 1.12% | 7196 | iab-ch...@iab.org 1.09% |1 | 1.08% | 6983 | tramm...@tik.ee.ethz.ch 1.09% |1 | 1.03% | 6626 | d...@cridland.net 1.09% |1 | 0.98% | 6352 | johannes.mer...@secunet.com 1.09% |1 | 0.96% | 6174 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 0.95% | 6108 | l...@cisco.com 1.09% |1 | 0.93% | 6027 | william.mcc...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 0.93% | 6010 | due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp 1.09% |1 | 0.91% | 5900 | sandra.mur...@sparta.com 1.09% |1 | 0.90% | 5811 | ch...@ietf.org 1.09% |1 | 0.90% | 5809 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.09% |1 | 0.90% | 5799 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.09% |1 | 0.88% | 5679 | l...@netapp.com 1.09% |1 | 0.88% | 5660 | d...@dotat.at 1.09% |1 | 0.87% | 5627 | barryle...@computer.org 1.09% |1 | 0.86% | 5548 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.09% |1 | 0.78% | 5034 | d...@xpasc.com 1.09% |1 | 0.78% | 5014 | bra...@isi.edu 1.09% |1 | 0.75% | 4814 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 1.09% |1 | 0.73% | 4727 | ra...@psg.com 1.09% |1 | 0.70% | 4502 | i...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 92 |100.00% | 645109 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 177 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 28 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.65% | 10 | 8.11% | 110934 | hal...@gmail.com 5.65% | 10 | 5.57% |76202 | john-i...@jck.com 4.52% |8 | 5.47% |74837 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 4.52% |8 | 4.48% |61298 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.82% |5 | 4.83% |66157 | mthor...@adobe.com 3.95% |7 | 3.37% |46083 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 3.95% |7 | 3.06% |41900 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.39% |6 | 2.96% |40545 | scott.b...@gmail.com 3.39% |6 | 2.94% |40172 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 2.82% |5 | 3.22% |44133 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.26% |4 | 3.15% |43058 | d...@cridland.net 2.82% |5 | 2.50% |34215 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.82% |5 | 2.07% |28370 | l...@netapp.com 2.26% |4 | 2.16% |29572 | jcur...@istaff.org 2.26% |4 | 1.91% |26171 | s...@resistor.net 1.69% |3 | 2.15% |29469 | akat...@gmail.com 1.69% |3 | 1.85% |25314 | jab...@hopcount.ca 1.13% |2 | 2.38% |32597 | b...@nostrum.com 1.69% |3 | 1.76% |24108 | l...@cisco.com 1.69% |3 | 1.67% |22799 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.69% |3 | 1.47% |20134 | mstjo...@comcast.net 1.69% |3 | 1.47% |20119 | d...@1-4-5.net 1.69% |3 | 1.26% |17180 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.69% |3 | 1.07% |14713 | ra...@psg.com 1.13% |2 | 1.36% |18554 | daedu...@btconnect.com 1.13% |2 | 1.22% |16695 | barryle...@computer.org 1.13% |2 | 1.19% |16317 | dhark...@lounge.org 1.13% |2 | 1.00% |13656 | f...@cisco.com 1.13% |2 | 0.99% |13588 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 1.13% |2 | 0.98% |13415 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.13% |2 | 0.95% |13022 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.13% |2 | 0.95% |12989 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.13% |2 | 0.94% |12845 | iab-ch...@iab.org 1.13% |2 | 0.90% |12257 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.13% |2 | 0.81% |11043 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.13% |2 | 0.78% |10724 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.13% |2 | 0.64% | 8778 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.56% |1 | 0.96% |13129 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.56% |1 | 0.77% |10514 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.56% |1 | 0.73% | 9993 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.56% |1 | 0.71% | 9769 | jdr...@juniper.net 0.56% |1 | 0.63% | 8650 | rich...@shockey.us 0.56% |1 | 0.61% | 8295 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.56% |1 | 0.60% | 8144 | s...@harvard.edu 0.56% |1 | 0.59% | 8111 | far...@umn.edu 0.56% |1 | 0.58% | 7976 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 0.56% |1 | 0.58% | 7902 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 0.56% |1 | 0.57% | 7844 | faizz...@yahoo.com 0.56% |1 | 0.54% | 7453 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.56% |1 | 0.53% | 7290 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.56% |1 | 0.52% | 7155 | t...@att.com 0.56% |1 | 0.52% | 7120 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.56% |1 | 0.50% | 6843 | va...@comnet.tkk.fi 0.56% |1 | 0.49% | 6770 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.56% |1 | 0.48% | 6621 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.56% |1 | 0.48% | 6621 | d...@xpasc.com 0.56% |1 | 0.47% | 6391 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.56% |1 | 0.47% | 6368 | m...@sandelman.ca 0.56% |1 | 0.45% | 6142 | o...@ogud.com 0.56% |1 | 0.44% | 6072 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.56% |1 | 0.44% | 6067 | i...@ietf.org 0.56% |1 | 0.43% | 5848 | jmamo...@gmail.com 0.56% |1 | 0.42% | 5781 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.56% |1 | 0.41% | 5638 | l...@pi.nu 0.56% |1 | 0.40% | 5449 | d...@ewellic.org 0.56% |1 | 0.39% | 5293 | flu...@iii.ca 0.56% |1 | 0.37% | 5025 | m...@sap.com 0.56% |1 | 0.33% | 4458 | age...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 177 |100.00% | 1368695 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 164 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 21 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.93% | 13 | 6.46% |83622 | stpe...@stpeter.im 6.10% | 10 | 5.81% |75305 | do...@dougbarton.us 4.88% |8 | 3.91% |50591 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 4.27% |7 | 4.48% |58056 | john-i...@jck.com 3.05% |5 | 4.91% |63546 | david.bl...@emc.com 3.05% |5 | 3.70% |47900 | hal...@gmail.com 3.05% |5 | 3.37% |43652 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 3.66% |6 | 2.68% |34743 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.44% |4 | 3.47% |44982 | jsalo...@cisco.com 2.44% |4 | 2.11% |27359 | s...@resistor.net 2.44% |4 | 2.03% |26268 | ted.le...@nominum.com 2.44% |4 | 2.01% |26016 | joe...@bogus.com 2.44% |4 | 1.95% |25313 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.83% |3 | 2.27% |29410 | morrowc.li...@gmail.com 1.83% |3 | 2.01% |25980 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.83% |3 | 1.83% |23694 | p...@frobbit.se 1.83% |3 | 1.79% |23217 | b...@nostrum.com 1.83% |3 | 1.56% |20167 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.83% |3 | 1.49% |19314 | war...@kumari.net 1.22% |2 | 2.05% |26509 | ed.le...@neustar.biz 1.83% |3 | 1.42% |18361 | hartm...@painless-security.com 1.83% |3 | 1.24% |16039 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 1.83% |3 | 1.23% |15972 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 0.61% |1 | 2.41% |31232 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 1.83% |3 | 1.14% |14763 | ra...@psg.com 1.22% |2 | 1.68% |21721 | suresh.krish...@ericsson.com 0.61% |1 | 2.27% |29379 | magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com 1.22% |2 | 1.42% |18391 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 1.22% |2 | 1.40% |18104 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.22% |2 | 1.36% |17556 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.22% |2 | 1.35% |17460 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 1.22% |2 | 1.27% |16497 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 1.22% |2 | 1.19% |15475 | f...@cisco.com 1.22% |2 | 1.02% |13166 | br...@innovationslab.net 1.22% |2 | 0.86% |11137 | aser...@lacnic.net 1.22% |2 | 0.70% | 9102 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.61% |1 | 1.10% |14193 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.61% |1 | 0.85% |10959 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.61% |1 | 0.83% |10754 | d...@cridland.net 0.61% |1 | 0.81% |10541 | shollenb...@verisign.com 0.61% |1 | 0.78% |10037 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 0.61% |1 | 0.74% | 9635 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.61% |1 | 0.73% | 9392 | mirja.kuehlew...@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de 0.61% |1 | 0.68% | 8857 | f...@isoc.org 0.61% |1 | 0.66% | 8528 | me...@globetel.com.ph 0.61% |1 | 0.61% | 7937 | barryle...@computer.org 0.61% |1 | 0.59% | 7633 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.61% |1 | 0.59% | 7614 | scott.b...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.57% | 7422 | droma...@avaya.com 0.61% |1 | 0.57% | 7367 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.55% | 7182 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.61% |1 | 0.54% | 7035 | nomcom-chair-2...@ietf.org 0.61% |1 | 0.53% | 6804 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.61% |1 | 0.52% | 6786 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.61% |1 | 0.51% | 6609 | ma...@isc.org 0.61% |1 | 0.51% | 6549 | jo...@taugh.com 0.61% |1 | 0.50% | 6442 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.61% |1 | 0.48% | 6250 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 0.61% |1 | 0.47% | 6147 | m...@mnot.net 0.61% |1 | 0.46% | 5925 | turn...@ieca.com 0.61% |1 | 0.45% | 5781 | jo...@iecc.com 0.61% |1 | 0.44% | 5733 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.61% |1 | 0.44% | 5640 | o...@ogud.com 0.61% |1 | 0.43% | 5549 | c...@tzi.org 0.61% |1 | 0.41% | 5339 | d...@xpasc.com 0.61% |1 | 0.40% | 5241 | d...@virtualized.org 0.61% |1 | 0.40% | 5212 | i...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 164 |100.00% | 1295092 | Total
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
* For Week 25 in 2013 About 17 subjects discussed, about 6 IETF LCs, about 3 Gen-Art Review. On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com wrote: Messages | Bytes | Who +--++--+ 1.83% | 3 | 2.01% | 25980 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3 messages in same subject IETF Diversity - *For Week 24 in 2013 AB total number of discussed subjects/threads on the IETF list are about 20. AB total number of discussed IETF LCs in this week are about 7. On 6/14/13, Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com wrote: Total of 158 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 14 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 3.16% |5 | 4.16% |52840 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com AB abdussalambar...@gmail.com contributed to 4 subjects on the IETF list, 2 IETF LC I-Ds and 2 general subjects. -- Please note that I consider mentioning my input number with email address in the list without number of subject as a comment on my input to IETF list, therefore, I will have to reply, only if you exclude my address from your report, or if you add the number of subjects at least. Please note that I have not given any one a permission/allowance to comment/count on my number of inputs, and that I requested that the subject number to be added. Overall, if you have a permission from the community for this report please provide me with a reference. Best Regards AB
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
AB Thomas started posting these weekly reports many years ago as a service to the community to remind us all that posting to ietf@ietf.org contributes to the information and work overload of the IETF community as a whole. The numbers are a reminder to think carefully about what you send to the list and to only send what you consider to be sufficiently important that the community as a whole needs to be aware of it. Most members of the IETF community try their best to minimize their so called Narten Number. Many regard these postings as a useful service, and I for one, thank him for doing it. - Stewart
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
+1 (and that will be my only posting on this subject, I suggest that if you don't get Stewart's drift you stop sending mails to the list until you do) /Loa On 2013-06-21 15:00, Stewart Bryant wrote: AB Thomas started posting these weekly reports many years ago as a service to the community to remind us all that posting to ietf@ietf.org contributes to the information and work overload of the IETF community as a whole. The numbers are a reminder to think carefully about what you send to the list and to only send what you consider to be sufficiently important that the community as a whole needs to be aware of it. Most members of the IETF community try their best to minimize their so called Narten Number. Many regard these postings as a useful service, and I for one, thank him for doing it. - Stewart -- Loa Anderssonemail: l...@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert l...@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Hi Stewart, I don't have any problem with the report/reminder only that it has missing important information. The subjects of discussions are not counted, so I counted them. Also the report does not distinguish between general-posting and replying to IETF LCs. AB On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Stewart Bryant stbry...@cisco.com wrote: AB Thomas started posting these weekly reports many years ago as a service to the community to remind us all that posting to ietf@ietf.org contributes to the information and work overload of the IETF community as a whole. The numbers are a reminder to think carefully about what you send to the list and to only send what you consider to be sufficiently important that the community as a whole needs to be aware of it. Most members of the IETF community try their best to minimize their so called Narten Number. Many regard these postings as a useful service, and I for one, thank him for doing it. - Stewart
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
These are valid points. For a long time, I used a public forum support reporter for our support process which categorized daily and hourly messaging patterns, hottest threads and topics and reply efficiency concepts. Basically to see how many messages were replied to in general and how many were replied by the technical support staff (measured against a list of certain responders) and how many were missed (ignored) which you strived to minimized. In the past, I considered using this reporter here just to see, but it already had a posting summary and it would be viewed more as an redundant annoyance. Plus, I certainly do no want to step on anyone shoes. In my view, it offers little other than as other stated to mind your number of post, but clearly that doesn't apply to all folks. If you have something to say, this is not going to deter you. Others may feel otherwise, but these folks don't care what you think and rightly so. Based on what I see, most messages are during weekdays and during the day, normal working hours I suppose. It does cut down by the weekend. While there is a high ignorance factor at the particular individual level, most messages have a high reply factor. IOW, most messages are not ignored. Of course, that may just mean when a message is not interesting, it gets ignored. There is also a Shutdown factor too - when a certain individual post, people tend to stop posting. But I think overall, the SUPPORT factor per se is pretty good here and in the most IETF forums I've participating in. However, it does depend on who is doing the postings and this fact shouldn't be a surprise. -- HLS On 6/21/2013 10:48 AM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote: Hi Stewart, I don't have any problem with the report/reminder only that it has missing important information. The subjects of discussions are not counted, so I counted them. Also the report does not distinguish between general-posting and replying to IETF LCs. AB On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Stewart Bryant stbry...@cisco.com wrote: AB Thomas started posting these weekly reports many years ago as a service to the community to remind us all that posting to ietf@ietf.org contributes to the information and work overload of the IETF community as a whole. The numbers are a reminder to think carefully about what you send to the list and to only send what you consider to be sufficiently important that the community as a whole needs to be aware of it. Most members of the IETF community try their best to minimize their so called Narten Number. Many regard these postings as a useful service, and I for one, thank him for doing it. - Stewart
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
It seems to me that you have missed the fact that the IETF is a volunteer organization. The vast majority of us appreciate that Thomas creates this summary. If you feel different information would be useful, then create your own report and share the results, to at least to see if your version is desired. Thomas provided a link in the earlier discussion to his code so I imagine you could use that as a starting point. You might also find it helpful to review the terms of the IETF Note Well which you agreed to when you joined this list. You lose control of anything you contribute so making demands about how that information is used is pointless. On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Abdussalam Baryun wrote: Hi Stewart, I don't have any problem with the report/reminder only that it has missing important information. The subjects of discussions are not counted, so I counted them. Also the report does not distinguish between general-posting and replying to IETF LCs. AB On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Stewart Bryant stbry...@cisco.com wrote: AB Thomas started posting these weekly reports many years ago as a service to the community to remind us all that posting to ietf@ietf.org contributes to the information and work overload of the IETF community as a whole. The numbers are a reminder to think carefully about what you send to the list and to only send what you consider to be sufficiently important that the community as a whole needs to be aware of it. Most members of the IETF community try their best to minimize their so called Narten Number. Many regard these postings as a useful service, and I for one, thank him for doing it. - Stewart
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 158 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 14 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 10.13% | 16 | 9.82% | 124800 | ted.le...@nominum.com 5.06% |8 | 6.98% |88757 | d...@cridland.net 4.43% |7 | 4.80% |61022 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 3.80% |6 | 3.80% |48351 | s...@resistor.net 3.80% |6 | 3.54% |45049 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 3.16% |5 | 4.16% |52840 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.80% |6 | 3.04% |38633 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.16% |5 | 2.73% |34740 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.16% |5 | 2.56% |32572 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.16% |5 | 2.00% |25369 | ra...@psg.com 2.53% |4 | 2.37% |30074 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.90% |3 | 2.47% |31426 | magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com 2.53% |4 | 1.77% |22553 | d...@xpasc.com 1.90% |3 | 2.14% |27243 | a...@yumaworks.com 1.90% |3 | 1.70% |21617 | joe...@bogus.com 1.90% |3 | 1.61% |20461 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.27% |2 | 1.68% |21373 | elw...@folly.org.uk 1.27% |2 | 1.62% |20640 | droma...@avaya.com 1.27% |2 | 1.62% |20584 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.27% |2 | 1.50% |19051 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 1.27% |2 | 1.43% |18119 | d3e...@gmail.com 1.27% |2 | 1.34% |16981 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.27% |2 | 1.26% |15973 | s...@harvard.edu 1.27% |2 | 1.20% |15292 | turn...@ieca.com 0.63% |1 | 1.80% |22839 | jdr...@juniper.net 1.27% |2 | 1.15% |14594 | ulr...@herberg.name 1.27% |2 | 1.11% |14169 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.27% |2 | 1.11% |14096 | rpellet...@isoc.org 1.27% |2 | 1.10% |14014 | john-i...@jck.com 1.27% |2 | 1.09% |13798 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.27% |2 | 1.06% |13454 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.27% |2 | 1.00% |12670 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 0.63% |1 | 1.62% |20647 | yi.ji...@gmail.com 1.27% |2 | 0.99% |12579 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.27% |2 | 0.96% |12163 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.63% |1 | 1.27% |16099 | l...@netapp.com 0.63% |1 | 0.98% |12438 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.86% |10985 | barryle...@computer.org 0.63% |1 | 0.81% |10259 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.80% |10208 | co...@isoc.org 0.63% |1 | 0.79% |10055 | war...@kumari.net 0.63% |1 | 0.76% | 9637 | mthor...@adobe.com 0.63% |1 | 0.73% | 9336 | og...@earthlink.net 0.63% |1 | 0.67% | 8536 | r...@ipv.sx 0.63% |1 | 0.67% | 8463 | m...@mnot.net 0.63% |1 | 0.59% | 7508 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.63% |1 | 0.59% | 7458 | martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu 0.63% |1 | 0.58% | 7344 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.56% | 7178 | glenz...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.56% | 7122 | m...@blackops.org 0.63% |1 | 0.55% | 6963 | ma...@isc.org 0.63% |1 | 0.53% | 6792 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.63% |1 | 0.52% | 6659 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 0.63% |1 | 0.52% | 6606 | l...@cisco.com 0.63% |1 | 0.52% | 6584 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.63% |1 | 0.51% | 6541 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.51% | 6495 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.63% |1 | 0.50% | 6378 | jul...@braga.eti.br 0.63% |1 | 0.48% | 6084 | pe...@akayla.com 0.63% |1 | 0.48% | 6076 | jo...@taugh.com 0.63% |1 | 0.48% | 6055 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.63% |1 | 0.47% | 5965 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.63% |1 | 0.47% | 5916 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.63% |1 | 0.46% | 5880 | amor...@amsl.com 0.63% |1 | 0.46% | 5847 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 0.63% |1 | 0.43% | 5509 | c...@tzi.org 0.63% |1 | 0.42% | 5331 | swm...@swm.pp.se 0.63% |1 | 0.36% | 4587 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 158 |100.00% | 1271437 | Total
Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org]
As long the subject clearly identifies a last call request thread, I don't see why the LC's cannot stay here. There are already too many mailing lists in the world. My humble opinion. ~Carlos On 6/7/13 5:00 PM, Melinda Shore wrote: On 6/7/13 11:52 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Rule 1 for complex and divergent mail threads is to change the Subject header when the subject changes. If you don't do that, your mail is rather likely to get junked. I think that IETF last call threads should stay on the main IETF discussion list. That is exactly the right place for them. I tend to think so, as well. You never know when someone's going to stumble over something and make a comment that matters. The cost is that you get jackasses being loud and petty, but frankly you'd get that on a last call mailing list, anyway, since IETF last calls have in a few cases been known to function as jackass magnets. It seems to me that the real problem isn't last calls, it's people not understanding that behaving badly has a cost associated with it, and that cost is that they're alienating people they'd (apparently) like to work with and demolishing their chances of getting an editorship or moving into leadership roles. Melinda
Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org]
On 06/08/2013 02:52 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Rule 1 for complex and divergent mail threads is to change the Subject header when the subject changes. If you don't do that, your mail is rather likely to get junked. I think that IETF last call threads should stay on the main IETF discussion list. That is exactly the right place for them. Since I've requested (read begged ;-) for such threads to be moved to their own list on several occasions, I disagree again. It's rather trivial to filter them into a dedicated folder; I have one called 'lastcallsin', that also picks up most WG Last Call threads, although those have less standardised subject headers. This would appear to work consistently only as long as 'Rule 1' above is not followed. Brian On 08/06/2013 06:17, Juliao Braga wrote: +1 Em 07/06/2013 15:09, Ulrich Herberg escreveu: I like the idea of a separate list for last calls. It would not solve the issue of noise for all of us (and not reduce the overall amount of emails), but it would separate general discussions from IETF LCs. I have IETF emails filtered by mailing list into different IMAP folders, and thus a separation could be useful for me. Ulrich
RE: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org]
I believe that last calls must stay on this ietf list. Any last-call-only list must be *in addition* to the ietf list, with all announcements crossposted, and anyone sensitive to general discussion can subscribe to that instead. Last calls need wide exposure. (I'm acked in at least one RFC as a result of discussion on this list as a result of last call.) I'd go further and say that if you're contributing to an ietf workgroup, subscribing to ietf and ietf-announce should be mandatory for posting rights in that group. Sure, you can filter the mails to /dev/null, but getting a broad idea of what's going on is a good thing, no? I'm willing to bet that at least half of our design problems have resulted from people doing narrowly-focused work in only one group or area... Lloyd Wood http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/ From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Glen Zorn [glenz...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 June 2013 07:31 To: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org] On 06/08/2013 02:52 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Rule 1 for complex and divergent mail threads is to change the Subject header when the subject changes. If you don't do that, your mail is rather likely to get junked. I think that IETF last call threads should stay on the main IETF discussion list. That is exactly the right place for them. Since I've requested (read begged ;-) for such threads to be moved to their own list on several occasions, I disagree again. It's rather trivial to filter them into a dedicated folder; I have one called 'lastcallsin', that also picks up most WG Last Call threads, although those have less standardised subject headers. This would appear to work consistently only as long as 'Rule 1' above is not followed. Brian On 08/06/2013 06:17, Juliao Braga wrote: +1 Em 07/06/2013 15:09, Ulrich Herberg escreveu: I like the idea of a separate list for last calls. It would not solve the issue of noise for all of us (and not reduce the overall amount of emails), but it would separate general discussions from IETF LCs. I have IETF emails filtered by mailing list into different IMAP folders, and thus a separation could be useful for me. Ulrich
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
On Jun 7, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Thomas Narten wrote: What the weekly stats really ought to tally up is the readers/postings ratio, so that folk would get more direct feedback as to whether what they are posting is actually being read... My strong suspicion would be that there is strong negative correlation between frequency of posts and actual readers of those posts... Also, I suspect that many people do not realize that a significant chunk of IETF contributers are no longer subscribed to the ietf list due to signal to noise ratio concerns... This list has 2155 subscribers. Rough, quick count numbers: 56 sent messages week ending 31 May 58 week ending 24 May 87 week ending 3 May 56 week ending 5 April 82 Week ending 8 March 28 week ending 8 Feb 68 week ending 11 Jan Average: 62 or 3% on the list Quick glance looks like same people most of the time sending messages Would be interesting to just report on Last Call mail. You might find justification there by itself to create a Last-Call list. Ray Thomas
Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org]
On Jun 8, 2013, at 6:09 AM, l.w...@surrey.ac.uk l.w...@surrey.ac.uk wrote: I believe that last calls must stay on this ietf list. Any last-call-only list must be *in addition* to the ietf list, with all announcements crossposted, and anyone sensitive to general discussion can subscribe to that instead. Last calls need wide exposure. (I'm acked in at least one RFC as a result of discussion on this list as a result of last call.) I'd go further and say that if you're contributing to an ietf workgroup, subscribing to ietf and ietf-announce should be mandatory for posting rights in that group. The ietf list has 2,155 subscribers, Announce, 3,203 with 915 duplicates, for total unique addresses of 4,442. Ray Sure, you can filter the mails to /dev/null, but getting a broad idea of what's going on is a good thing, no? I'm willing to bet that at least half of our design problems have resulted from people doing narrowly-focused work in only one group or area... Lloyd Wood http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/ From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Glen Zorn [glenz...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 June 2013 07:31 To: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org] On 06/08/2013 02:52 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Rule 1 for complex and divergent mail threads is to change the Subject header when the subject changes. If you don't do that, your mail is rather likely to get junked. I think that IETF last call threads should stay on the main IETF discussion list. That is exactly the right place for them. Since I've requested (read begged ;-) for such threads to be moved to their own list on several occasions, I disagree again. It's rather trivial to filter them into a dedicated folder; I have one called 'lastcallsin', that also picks up most WG Last Call threads, although those have less standardised subject headers. This would appear to work consistently only as long as 'Rule 1' above is not followed. Brian On 08/06/2013 06:17, Juliao Braga wrote: +1 Em 07/06/2013 15:09, Ulrich Herberg escreveu: I like the idea of a separate list for last calls. It would not solve the issue of noise for all of us (and not reduce the overall amount of emails), but it would separate general discussions from IETF LCs. I have IETF emails filtered by mailing list into different IMAP folders, and thus a separation could be useful for me. Ulrich
ietf@ietf.org is a failure (was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org)
At 15:58 07-06-2013, John C Klensin wrote: And it is getting to that conclusion from the above that often troubles me about the posting summary list rankings. Assuming a significant issues shows up on the list, whether in conjunction with a Last Call or something else. Posting a comment and then following up the comments of others with a couple of more postings constitutes three messages in a week, which is pretty reasonable. On the other hand, if there are four such issues in a single week (it happens) then that same individual gets credited with a dozen messages, which would make the top of the list in many weeks. I'll reuse some text from IETF 55: - Decisions are taken by backroom deals, intimidation and mob psychology - People unsubscribe in disgust in droves Many years ago the following criticism was made against another body: The process is stacked in favour of multinationals with expense accounts who can afford to talk on the phone for two hours a week and jet to world capitals for meetings. The IESG once said that it prefers that comments on Last Calls be sent to the ietf@ietf.org list. The IESG also said that authors, working group Chairs and the responsible Area Director are presumed to see all such messages. Is posting the summary list ranking a form of intimidation? I don't know. If ietf@ietf.org is a failure as significant issues are not showing up on the list (see quoted text above) or if the IESG prefers that comments on Last Calls be sent to some other list it can say that. If people unsubscribing in droves is a problem, the IESG could recommend having two hour phone calls a week and meetings in world capitals for Last Calls. If the IESG believes that it is more practical to take decisions through backroom deals it can use a non-public list for handling Last Calls. If a significant number of people cannot act or conduct themselves in a proper way, especially toward others, it is a social problem. If people cannot filter the ietf@ietf.org mailing list, it is a technical problem. The IETF has published a specification which describes a language for filtering email messages at time of final delivery. After reading the latest messages to the list I might conclude that: (i) people do not know about the mail filtering language (ii) people are having technical difficulties using email (iii) it might rain tomorrow As an off-topic comment, there are are alternative ways in making a decision; the best judgement of the most experienced or IETF Consensus. Regards, -sm
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Hi thomas, AB Comment on the summary report I recommend to add a column for subjects (number of subjects), because the number of subject participated in is very important is such summary. I think the pupose of this summary should be added as well in each post, I don't know why, only I expect the purpose is that it informs of work volume or overhead in such list. AB On 6/7/13, Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com wrote: Total of 146 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 7 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 10.27% | 15 | 9.96% | 125797 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.11% |6 | 6.44% |81389 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 5.48% |8 | 3.76% |47556 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 4.11% |6 | 4.30% |54259 | war...@kumari.net 3.42% |5 | 3.58% |45181 | john-i...@jck.com 3.42% |5 | 3.28% |41450 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 3.42% |5 | 3.16% |39894 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.42% |5 | 2.36% |29749 | ra...@psg.com 2.74% |4 | 2.53% |31911 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 2.74% |4 | 2.18% |27483 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 3.38% |42690 | ron.even@gmail.com 2.74% |4 | 1.86% |23539 | m...@mnot.net 1.37% |2 | 3.15% |39833 | simo.veikkolai...@nokia.com 2.05% |3 | 1.88% |23809 | scott.b...@gmail.com 2.05% |3 | 1.68% |21225 | s...@resistor.net 2.05% |3 | 1.62% |20488 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.37% |2 | 2.29% |28971 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 2.05% |3 | 1.54% |19411 | jmamo...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 2.80% |35397 | elw...@folly.org.uk 2.05% |3 | 1.37% |17285 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.68% |1 | 2.66% |33542 | cb.li...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 1.73% |21883 | barryle...@computer.org 1.37% |2 | 1.64% |20761 | jcur...@istaff.org 1.37% |2 | 1.50% |18953 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 1.44% |18207 | ulr...@herberg.name 1.37% |2 | 1.37% |17302 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.37% |2 | 1.35% |17078 | aeop...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 1.27% |16048 | m...@blackops.org 1.37% |2 | 1.10% |13834 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 1.09% |13711 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 1.37% |2 | 1.06% |13376 | joe...@bogus.com 1.37% |2 | 0.94% |11882 | c...@tzi.org 1.37% |2 | 0.92% |11641 | to...@isi.edu 0.68% |1 | 1.60% |20151 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 1.37% |2 | 0.88% |11081 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.37% |2 | 0.87% |10956 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.68% |1 | 0.95% |12013 | ke-oog...@kddi.com 0.68% |1 | 0.88% |11066 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.68% |1 | 0.73% | 9244 | og...@earthlink.net 0.68% |1 | 0.67% | 8504 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.66% | 8340 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.63% | 7996 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.68% |1 | 0.63% | 7948 | yb...@panix.com 0.68% |1 | 0.62% | 7882 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.68% |1 | 0.61% | 7654 | i...@cdl.asgaard.org 0.68% |1 | 0.61% | 7651 | yi.ji...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.60% | 7579 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.68% |1 | 0.59% | 7486 | ma...@isc.org 0.68% |1 | 0.55% | 6960 | d...@cridland.net 0.68% |1 | 0.55% | 6886 | aman...@verisign.com 0.68% |1 | 0.53% | 6748 | rwfra...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.52% | 6615 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.68% |1 | 0.52% | 6609 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.68% |1 | 0.51% | 6418 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.68% |1 | 0.50% | 6367 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.68% |1 | 0.50% | 6353 | p...@cypherpunks.ca 0.68% |1 | 0.50% | 6328 | f...@cisco.com 0.68% |1 | 0.49% | 6164 | p...@frobbit.se 0.68% |1 | 0.45% | 5654 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.68% |1 | 0.44% | 5502 | nscl...@gmx.de 0.68% |1 | 0.41% | 5235 | c...@a.org 0.68% |1 | 0.41% | 5212 | pe...@akayla.com 0.68% |1 | 0.40% | 5074 | wjh...@hardakers.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 146 |100.00% | 1263211 | Total
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:33 AM, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com wrote: I recommend to add a column for subjects (number of subjects), because the number of subject participated in is very important is such summary. It has always been my assumption that the point of this summary was to give us all a reality check when we say too much on the IETF mailing list. Saying things on the IETF mailing list is very expensive because it addresses the entire IETF; we should choose our words carefully, and say no more than is absolutely necessary. So I think that total volume is really the most important metric—I was very upset a month or so ago when I noticed that I'd been the most voluminous poster, and I've tried to avoid being the top poster again since then.
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
What the weekly stats really ought to tally up is the readers/postings ratio, so that folk would get more direct feedback as to whether what they are posting is actually being read... My strong suspicion would be that there is strong negative correlation between frequency of posts and actual readers of those posts... Also, I suspect that many people do not realize that a significant chunk of IETF contributers are no longer subscribed to the ietf list due to signal to noise ratio concerns... Thomas
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com wrote: What the weekly stats really ought to tally up is the readers/postings ratio, so that folk would get more direct feedback as to whether what they are posting is actually being read... My strong suspicion would be that there is strong negative correlation between frequency of posts and actual readers of those posts... Also, I suspect that many people do not realize that a significant chunk of IETF contributers are no longer subscribed to the ietf list due to signal to noise ratio concerns... So why not move the signal? Put IETF Last Call mail on last-c...@ietf.org and leave this list for everything else. I don't really want people counting their bytes when they are concerned about a technical issue in an I-D. It may take several exchanges for a disagreement to be resolved. Social pressure to stay out of the top-N report could have a negative impact on last call debates. Thomas Andy
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.commailto:a...@yumaworks.com wrote: So why not move the signal? Put IETF Last Call mail on last-c...@ietf.orgmailto:last-c...@ietf.org and leave this list for everything else. The discussion still has to happen somewhere. I certainly am not restricting my meaningful participation in last calls, but even in that case it is important to be restrained and not get into long fruitless discussions, which, I am afraid, I am wont to do.
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
On 7 Jun 2013, at 16:52, Ted Lemon ted.le...@nominum.com wrote: On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote: So why not move the signal? Put IETF Last Call mail on last-c...@ietf.org and leave this list for everything else. The discussion still has to happen somewhere. I certainly am not restricting my meaningful participation in last calls, but even in that case it is important to be restrained and not get into long fruitless discussions, which, I am afraid, I am wont to do. It's a significant problem for those who *have* to read the threads, in particular document authors, WG chairs, and ADs. Hats off to them for keeping up with it where they need to. As another example, the v6ops list has recently also had four threads run well over the 100 message count, specifically end to end response time, ULA usage, being careful about ULAs and the semantic prefix thread. Of course, a healthy debate is a good thing, as is having an open process for discussion. If we had very few comments that would certainly not be good either. But I fear that some valuable contributions are either being drowned out, or that some people with valuable input are being put off contributing. Tim
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
As long as the summary has been brought up ... I've wondered for some time whether the reported bytes is the whole message I send included context quotes, or if there is an attempt by the summary logic to factor out quoted content. Dave Morris
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
From: David Morris d...@xpasc.com I've wondered for some time whether the reported bytes is the whole message I send included context quotes, or if there is an attempt by the summary logic to factor out quoted content. I think it's a _feature_ to count the included content, so that people who (often recursively) top-post on long prior messages, instead of editing down to just the bit(s) they are replying to, have some negative feedback for that (irritating) habit. Noel
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
On Jun 7, 2013, at 12:04 PM, David Morris d...@xpasc.com wrote: I've wondered for some time whether the reported bytes is the whole message I send included context quotes, or if there is an attempt by the summary logic to factor out quoted content. A penalty for top-posting sounds okay to me!
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Ted Lemon ted.le...@nominum.com wrote: On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote: So why not move the signal? Put IETF Last Call mail on last-c...@ietf.org and leave this list for everything else. The discussion still has to happen somewhere. I certainly am not restricting my meaningful participation in last calls, but even in that case it is important to be restrained and not get into long fruitless discussions, which, I am afraid, I am wont to do. Some people consider the last call discussions to be signal and the rest (vast majority) of discussions to be noise. They would subscribe to a last-call mailing list, but not this one. Andy
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
On 6/7/13 6:03 PM, Tim Chown wrote: On 7 Jun 2013, at 16:52, Ted Lemon ted.le...@nominum.com mailto:ted.le...@nominum.com wrote: On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com mailto:a...@yumaworks.com wrote: So why not move the signal? Put IETF Last Call mail onlast-c...@ietf.org mailto:last-c...@ietf.organd leave this list for everything else. The discussion still has to happen somewhere. I certainly am not restricting my meaningful participation in last calls, but even in that case it is important to be restrained and not get into long fruitless discussions, which, I am afraid, I am wont to do. It's a significant problem for those who *have* to read the threads, in particular document authors, WG chairs, and ADs. Hats off to them for keeping up with it where they need to. As another example, the v6ops list has recently also had four threads run well over the 100 message count, specifically end to end response time, ULA usage, being careful about ULAs and the semantic prefix thread. v6ops had a single draft which attracted ~1100 messages over the course of a year so this isn't new or unusual over there. A small number of posters tend to be the majority of the volume on several topics, so if you're reading to understand the positions of the working group or to measure consensus on the list some judicious sorting is required. Of course, a healthy debate is a good thing, as is having an open process for discussion. If we had very few comments that would certainly not be good either. But I fear that some valuable contributions are either being drowned out, or that some people with valuable input are being put off contributing. Tim
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013, Noel Chiappa wrote: From: David Morris d...@xpasc.com I've wondered for some time whether the reported bytes is the whole message I send included context quotes, or if there is an attempt by the summary logic to factor out quoted content. I think it's a _feature_ to count the included content, so that people who (often recursively) top-post on long prior messages, instead of editing down to just the bit(s) they are replying to, have some negative feedback for that (irritating) habit. For now, I'm just trying to confirm my impression of the data. Folks who don't make a case/case choice as to inline/top and removing chaff and unneeded context probably aren't going to care where they stand on the total byte count issue.
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
On 7 Jun 2013, at 17:12, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote: On 6/7/13 6:03 PM, Tim Chown wrote: As another example, the v6ops list has recently also had four threads run well over the 100 message count, specifically end to end response time, ULA usage, being careful about ULAs and the semantic prefix thread. v6ops had a single draft which attracted ~1100 messages over the course of a year so this isn't new or unusual over there. A small number of posters tend to be the majority of the volume on several topics, so if you're reading to understand the positions of the working group or to measure consensus on the list some judicious sorting is required. Indeed. Sorting and sifting through 500+ emails about one homenet topic over on 6man was similarly challenging (for the homenet arch text). And many of those long v6ops threads were/are relevant to that. It would be nice to determine some way to keep discussions open, without creating unnecessary volume, and repeating already raised arguments. Maybe the answer isn't email for judging consensus. As an outsider, I've seen the IESG/AD system, which seems to essentially allow positions on drafts to be expressed, and easily viewed at a glance. Maybe that's part of the answer, somehow. Some position view on a draft, that people can update/edit as the list discussion goes on, that becomes more useful at a glance for WG chairs and document editors? We could continue as is with emails, but I've heard of a number of (very wise and valued) past contributors who no longer express their views, because of the problem of volume. Or maybe it's not a valid concern. Tim
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
I've wondered for some time whether the reported bytes is the whole message I send included context quotes, or if there is an attempt by the summary logic to factor out quoted content. Original script is here: http://www.hactrn.net/hacks/mh-list-traffic/mh-list-traffic I don't think I've modified it other than to keep it running under my local setup. From my perspective, the intention/usefulness of the weekly posting is to give folk a high-level view of who is posting and how often. It is not uncommon to see certain individuals stand out. In some cases, that makes perfect sense -- and the signal level is high. In other cases, it shows (IMO) people who are too quick to post and who (too often) say predictable things if you've read previous threads on the same general topic. YMMV. Beyond that (e.g., tweaking the priorities of how rankings are done), I don't see much point. Different people will have different opinions on what to give priority to, and this is ultimately a judgement call. Thomas
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Andy == Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com writes: Andy So why not move the signal? Andy Put IETF Last Call mail on last-c...@ietf.org and leave this list for Andy everything else. Okay, that would work for me. Where would the reply-to: on those posts be set to? I also don't think we ever solved the problem of moderation of @ietf.org lists. Specifically, I'd like it so that once I'm subscribed to one @ietf.org list, that I could post to all of them. (Well, I wouldn't post, I'd be replying in most cases) -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works| network architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/| ruby on rails[ pgpT7FRkD7HwL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Thomas, From my perspective, the intention/usefulness of the weekly posting is to give folk a high-level view of who is posting and how often. It is not uncommon to see certain individuals stand out. In some cases, that makes perfect sense -- and the signal level is high. In other cases, it shows (IMO) people who are too quick to post and who (too often) say predictable things if you've read previous threads on the same general topic. YMMV. I agree with your conclusion. I also wish that the signal level was higher. The IETF list is important because we need to have a place where IETF wide issues can be discussed. That doesn't work if many people unsubscribe due to the the low signal to noise level. I hope that that people who consistently show up at the top of the posting summary will moderate their behavior. Bob
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
I like the idea of a separate list for last calls. It would not solve the issue of noise for all of us (and not reduce the overall amount of emails), but it would separate general discussions from IETF LCs. I have IETF emails filtered by mailing list into different IMAP folders, and thus a separation could be useful for me. Ulrich On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Ted Lemon ted.le...@nominum.com wrote: On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote: So why not move the signal? Put IETF Last Call mail on last-c...@ietf.org and leave this list for everything else. The discussion still has to happen somewhere. I certainly am not restricting my meaningful participation in last calls, but even in that case it is important to be restrained and not get into long fruitless discussions, which, I am afraid, I am wont to do. Some people consider the last call discussions to be signal and the rest (vast majority) of discussions to be noise. They would subscribe to a last-call mailing list, but not this one. Andy
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
+1 Em 07/06/2013 15:09, Ulrich Herberg escreveu: I like the idea of a separate list for last calls. It would not solve the issue of noise for all of us (and not reduce the overall amount of emails), but it would separate general discussions from IETF LCs. I have IETF emails filtered by mailing list into different IMAP folders, and thus a separation could be useful for me. Ulrich
Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org]
Rule 1 for complex and divergent mail threads is to change the Subject header when the subject changes. If you don't do that, your mail is rather likely to get junked. I think that IETF last call threads should stay on the main IETF discussion list. That is exactly the right place for them. It's rather trivial to filter them into a dedicated folder; I have one called 'lastcallsin', that also picks up most WG Last Call threads, although those have less standardised subject headers. Brian On 08/06/2013 06:17, Juliao Braga wrote: +1 Em 07/06/2013 15:09, Ulrich Herberg escreveu: I like the idea of a separate list for last calls. It would not solve the issue of noise for all of us (and not reduce the overall amount of emails), but it would separate general discussions from IETF LCs. I have IETF emails filtered by mailing list into different IMAP folders, and thus a separation could be useful for me. Ulrich
Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org]
On 6/7/13 11:52 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Rule 1 for complex and divergent mail threads is to change the Subject header when the subject changes. If you don't do that, your mail is rather likely to get junked. I think that IETF last call threads should stay on the main IETF discussion list. That is exactly the right place for them. I tend to think so, as well. You never know when someone's going to stumble over something and make a comment that matters. The cost is that you get jackasses being loud and petty, but frankly you'd get that on a last call mailing list, anyway, since IETF last calls have in a few cases been known to function as jackass magnets. It seems to me that the real problem isn't last calls, it's people not understanding that behaving badly has a cost associated with it, and that cost is that they're alienating people they'd (apparently) like to work with and demolishing their chances of getting an editorship or moving into leadership roles. Melinda
Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
--On Friday, 07 June, 2013 10:57 -0700 Bob Hinden bob.hin...@gmail.com wrote: Thomas, From my perspective, the intention/usefulness of the weekly posting is to give folk a high-level view of who is posting and how often. It is not uncommon to see certain individuals stand out. In some cases, that makes perfect sense -- and the ... I agree with your conclusion. I also wish that the signal level was higher. The IETF list is important because we need to have a place where IETF wide issues can be discussed. That doesn't work if many people unsubscribe due to the the low signal to noise level. Agreed so far. I hope that that people who consistently show up at the top of the posting summary will moderate their behavior. And it is getting to that conclusion from the above that often troubles me about the posting summary list rankings. Assuming a significant issues shows up on the list, whether in conjunction with a Last Call or something else. Posting a comment and then following up the comments of others with a couple of more postings constitutes three messages in a week, which is pretty reasonable. On the other hand, if there are four such issues in a single week (it happens) then that same individual gets credited with a dozen messages, which would make the top of the list in many weeks. Because things do often seem to happen in clusters, the summary list might be improved significantly by adding a four-week average and rankings based on it. That would help distinguish the regular heavy posters from those whose numbers went up because of a particular issue or set of issues in a given week or two. What that still wouldn't help with is distinguishing from a theoretical very active and diligent IETF participant who reviews and comments on every document that goes into Last Call push every other issue discussed on the list and a troll who comments on every Last Call and on other issues that he, she, or it might even generate. To measure that difference, one would need a measure of the useful and relevant information content of a message, not just a character/byte count. best, john
Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org]
I have mixed opinions, filters in general work well (some false positives like these ones that are moved to my Last Call filter) but in general it is ok. But I would not oppose to a new list for LC only. Regards, as On 6/7/13 4:52 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: I think that IETF last call threads should stay on the main IETF discussion list. That is exactly the right place for them. It's rather trivial to filter them into a dedicated folder; I have one called 'lastcallsin', that also picks up most WG Last Call threads, although those have less standardised subject headers.
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 146 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jun 7 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 10.27% | 15 | 9.96% | 125797 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.11% |6 | 6.44% |81389 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 5.48% |8 | 3.76% |47556 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 4.11% |6 | 4.30% |54259 | war...@kumari.net 3.42% |5 | 3.58% |45181 | john-i...@jck.com 3.42% |5 | 3.28% |41450 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 3.42% |5 | 3.16% |39894 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.42% |5 | 2.36% |29749 | ra...@psg.com 2.74% |4 | 2.53% |31911 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 2.74% |4 | 2.18% |27483 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 3.38% |42690 | ron.even@gmail.com 2.74% |4 | 1.86% |23539 | m...@mnot.net 1.37% |2 | 3.15% |39833 | simo.veikkolai...@nokia.com 2.05% |3 | 1.88% |23809 | scott.b...@gmail.com 2.05% |3 | 1.68% |21225 | s...@resistor.net 2.05% |3 | 1.62% |20488 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.37% |2 | 2.29% |28971 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 2.05% |3 | 1.54% |19411 | jmamo...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 2.80% |35397 | elw...@folly.org.uk 2.05% |3 | 1.37% |17285 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.68% |1 | 2.66% |33542 | cb.li...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 1.73% |21883 | barryle...@computer.org 1.37% |2 | 1.64% |20761 | jcur...@istaff.org 1.37% |2 | 1.50% |18953 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 1.44% |18207 | ulr...@herberg.name 1.37% |2 | 1.37% |17302 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.37% |2 | 1.35% |17078 | aeop...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 1.27% |16048 | m...@blackops.org 1.37% |2 | 1.10% |13834 | spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com 1.37% |2 | 1.09% |13711 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 1.37% |2 | 1.06% |13376 | joe...@bogus.com 1.37% |2 | 0.94% |11882 | c...@tzi.org 1.37% |2 | 0.92% |11641 | to...@isi.edu 0.68% |1 | 1.60% |20151 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 1.37% |2 | 0.88% |11081 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.37% |2 | 0.87% |10956 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.68% |1 | 0.95% |12013 | ke-oog...@kddi.com 0.68% |1 | 0.88% |11066 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.68% |1 | 0.73% | 9244 | og...@earthlink.net 0.68% |1 | 0.67% | 8504 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.66% | 8340 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.63% | 7996 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.68% |1 | 0.63% | 7948 | yb...@panix.com 0.68% |1 | 0.62% | 7882 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.68% |1 | 0.61% | 7654 | i...@cdl.asgaard.org 0.68% |1 | 0.61% | 7651 | yi.ji...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.60% | 7579 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.68% |1 | 0.59% | 7486 | ma...@isc.org 0.68% |1 | 0.55% | 6960 | d...@cridland.net 0.68% |1 | 0.55% | 6886 | aman...@verisign.com 0.68% |1 | 0.53% | 6748 | rwfra...@gmail.com 0.68% |1 | 0.52% | 6615 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.68% |1 | 0.52% | 6609 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.68% |1 | 0.51% | 6418 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.68% |1 | 0.50% | 6367 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.68% |1 | 0.50% | 6353 | p...@cypherpunks.ca 0.68% |1 | 0.50% | 6328 | f...@cisco.com 0.68% |1 | 0.49% | 6164 | p...@frobbit.se 0.68% |1 | 0.45% | 5654 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.68% |1 | 0.44% | 5502 | nscl...@gmx.de 0.68% |1 | 0.41% | 5235 | c...@a.org 0.68% |1 | 0.41% | 5212 | pe...@akayla.com 0.68% |1 | 0.40% | 5074 | wjh...@hardakers.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 146 |100.00% | 1263211 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 283 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri May 31 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.71% | 19 | 6.76% | 149502 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 5.30% | 15 | 4.74% | 104777 | jul...@braga.eti.br 4.59% | 13 | 4.81% | 106323 | john-i...@jck.com 4.95% | 14 | 4.05% |89568 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 4.24% | 12 | 4.09% |90539 | s...@resistor.net 3.53% | 10 | 3.01% |66505 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.53% | 10 | 2.90% |64207 | joe...@bogus.com 3.18% |9 | 2.48% |54808 | aser...@lacnic.net 2.83% |8 | 2.49% |54963 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.77% |5 | 3.36% |74410 | r...@ipv.sx 2.47% |7 | 2.53% |56045 | jmamo...@gmail.com 2.47% |7 | 2.32% |51295 | jo...@taugh.com 2.47% |7 | 2.09% |46177 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 2.47% |7 | 2.00% |44270 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.47% |7 | 1.73% |38288 | ra...@psg.com 1.77% |5 | 1.71% |37897 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.77% |5 | 1.47% |32493 | scott.b...@gmail.com 1.41% |4 | 1.47% |32458 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.41% |4 | 1.40% |30991 | christian.oflahe...@gmail.com 1.41% |4 | 1.37% |30267 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 1.41% |4 | 1.21% |26655 | l...@netapp.com 1.41% |4 | 1.09% |24055 | ferna...@gont.com.ar 0.71% |2 | 1.77% |39031 | cb.li...@gmail.com 1.41% |4 | 1.04% |22973 | to...@isi.edu 1.06% |3 | 1.18% |26094 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.71% |2 | 1.45% |32059 | h...@cs.columbia.edu 0.71% |2 | 1.31% |28905 | rumbi...@gmail.com 1.06% |3 | 0.93% |20651 | m...@mnot.net 0.71% |2 | 1.18% |26191 | ted.i...@gmail.com 1.06% |3 | 0.76% |16908 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.06% |3 | 0.75% |16616 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.71% |2 | 1.03% |22840 | aeop...@gmail.com 0.71% |2 | 0.94% |20854 | jmp...@cisco.com 0.71% |2 | 0.91% |20202 | g...@algebras.org 0.71% |2 | 0.87% |19276 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.71% |2 | 0.81% |17837 | sistopef...@gmail.com 0.71% |2 | 0.79% |17395 | aman...@verisign.com 0.71% |2 | 0.78% |17242 | mariainesrob...@googlemail.com 0.71% |2 | 0.78% |17142 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.71% |2 | 0.72% |15959 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.71% |2 | 0.69% |15241 | f...@cisco.com 0.71% |2 | 0.68% |15102 | l...@pi.nu 0.71% |2 | 0.65% |14361 | lber...@labn.net 0.71% |2 | 0.64% |14208 | np...@lca.org.ls 0.71% |2 | 0.64% |14122 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 0.71% |2 | 0.64% |14066 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.71% |2 | 0.62% |13706 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 0.71% |2 | 0.60% |13351 | p...@frobbit.se 0.71% |2 | 0.60% |13325 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.71% |2 | 0.58% |12859 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.71% |2 | 0.56% |12400 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.35% |1 | 0.90% |19792 | rogag...@cisco.com 0.71% |2 | 0.53% |11788 | swm...@swm.pp.se 0.71% |2 | 0.53% |11742 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.35% |1 | 0.85% |18711 | war...@kumari.net 0.35% |1 | 0.84% |18507 | ya...@cnnic.cn 0.35% |1 | 0.69% |15151 | me...@globetel.com.ph 0.35% |1 | 0.59% |13137 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.59% |13110 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.35% |1 | 0.59% |12940 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.35% |1 | 0.53% |11618 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.35% |1 | 0.50% |11052 | yi.ji...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.48% |10556 | jgu...@csc.com 0.35% |1 | 0.45% |10043 | vinay...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.43% | 9556 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.35% |1 | 0.43% | 9519 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.35% |1 | 0.40% | 8855 | jiangsh...@huawei.com 0.35% |1 | 0.40% | 8845 | morei...@nic.br 0.35% |1 | 0.38% | 8490 | ebur...@standardstrack.com 0.35% |1 | 0.38% | 8360 | rsouza@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.37% | 8092 | bmann...@isi.edu 0.35% |1 | 0.36% | 7895 | droma...@avaya.com 0.35% |1 | 0.35% | 7799 | ma...@isc.org 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7595 | tnad...@lucidvision.com 0.35% |1 | 0.34% | 7555 | ptha...@broadcom.com 0.35% |1 | 0.33% | 7406 | o...@cisco.com 0.35% |1 | 0.33% | 7386 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.33% | 7316 | d...@cridland.net 0.35% |1 | 0.29% | 6466 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 0.35% |1 | 0.29% | 6439 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.35% |1 | 0.29% | 6435 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.35% |1 | 0.29% | 6383 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.35% |1 | 0.28% | 6274 | b...@nostrum.com 0.35% |1 | 0.28% | 6247 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.35% |1 |
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 149 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri May 24 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 0.67% |1 | 28.96% | 458641 | wmwang2...@hotmail.com 12.75% | 19 | 9.43% | 149309 | john-i...@jck.com 12.08% | 18 | 8.28% | 131074 | mo...@network-heretics.com 5.37% |8 | 4.16% |65831 | ma...@isc.org 4.70% |7 | 3.42% |54157 | jab...@hopcount.ca 4.03% |6 | 3.06% |48437 | s...@resistor.net 4.03% |6 | 2.00% |31668 | ra...@psg.com 3.36% |5 | 2.46% |38892 | d3e...@gmail.com 3.36% |5 | 2.37% |37601 | joe...@bogus.com 3.36% |5 | 2.32% |36759 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.36% |5 | 2.21% |34948 | y...@checkpoint.com 3.36% |5 | 1.85% |29302 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 2.01% |3 | 2.50% |39573 | a...@yumaworks.com 2.01% |3 | 1.24% |19594 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.01% |3 | 1.18% |18718 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.34% |2 | 1.05% |16594 | bmann...@isi.edu 1.34% |2 | 0.99% |15622 | o...@gih.com 1.34% |2 | 0.94% |14898 | jul...@braga.eti.br 1.34% |2 | 0.88% |13975 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.34% |2 | 0.86% |13649 | s...@hactrn.net 1.34% |2 | 0.86% |13635 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.34% |2 | 0.80% |12725 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.34% |2 | 0.74% |11717 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.34% |2 | 0.73% |11526 | jo...@taugh.com 0.67% |1 | 1.10% |17501 | sprom...@unina.it 0.67% |1 | 0.97% |15328 | st...@shinkuro.com 0.67% |1 | 0.80% |12736 | ogawa.kent...@lab.ntt.co.jp 0.67% |1 | 0.75% |11936 | agma...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.65% |10346 | jmamo...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.64% |10099 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 0.67% |1 | 0.60% | 9569 | o...@ogud.com 0.67% |1 | 0.60% | 9457 | f...@cisco.com 0.67% |1 | 0.59% | 9378 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.67% |1 | 0.57% | 9040 | kotecha_ka...@yahoo.com 0.67% |1 | 0.56% | 8946 | vinay...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.54% | 8557 | d...@1-4-5.net 0.67% |1 | 0.52% | 8301 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.67% |1 | 0.51% | 8057 | sarikaya2...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.49% | 7828 | b...@nostrum.com 0.67% |1 | 0.48% | 7548 | jcur...@istaff.org 0.67% |1 | 0.45% | 7121 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.67% |1 | 0.45% | 7080 | akat...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.44% | 7018 | br...@innovationslab.net 0.67% |1 | 0.44% | 7005 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 0.67% |1 | 0.42% | 6688 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.42% | 6602 | superu...@gmail.com 0.67% |1 | 0.41% | 6415 | ray.bel...@nominet.org.uk 0.67% |1 | 0.40% | 6405 | barryle...@computer.org 0.67% |1 | 0.40% | 6355 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.67% |1 | 0.38% | 6072 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.67% |1 | 0.37% | 5937 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.67% |1 | 0.36% | 5631 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.67% |1 | 0.35% | 5584 | bortzme...@nic.fr 0.67% |1 | 0.35% | 5558 | m...@mnot.net 0.67% |1 | 0.35% | 5489 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.67% |1 | 0.34% | 5388 | d...@virtualized.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 149 |100.00% | 1583820 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 151 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri May 17 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 9.27% | 14 | 9.58% | 113593 | mo...@network-heretics.com 9.27% | 14 | 7.82% |92650 | to...@isi.edu 7.28% | 11 | 6.76% |80173 | ted.le...@nominum.com 3.97% |6 | 6.47% |76736 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.31% |5 | 3.67% |43481 | s...@resistor.net 3.31% |5 | 3.63% |43035 | nar...@us.ibm.com 3.31% |5 | 3.34% |39531 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 3.31% |5 | 3.00% |35548 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.31% |5 | 2.98% |35297 | j...@joelhalpern.com 3.31% |5 | 2.72% |32293 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 2.65% |4 | 3.17% |37539 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.65% |4 | 2.09% |24748 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.65% |4 | 1.96% |23226 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.99% |3 | 2.20% |26128 | john-i...@jck.com 1.99% |3 | 1.73% |20523 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 1.32% |2 | 2.05% |24243 | wmwang2...@hotmail.com 1.99% |3 | 1.36% |16166 | swm...@swm.pp.se 1.32% |2 | 1.92% |22726 | a...@yumaworks.com 1.32% |2 | 1.68% |19888 | flu...@cisco.com 1.32% |2 | 1.48% |17563 | far...@umn.edu 1.32% |2 | 1.41% |16770 | tv...@eyeconomics.com 1.32% |2 | 1.41% |16659 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.32% |2 | 1.36% |16115 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.32% |2 | 1.22% |14478 | scott.b...@gmail.com 1.32% |2 | 1.21% |14343 | joe...@bogus.com 1.32% |2 | 1.21% |14321 | f...@cisco.com 1.32% |2 | 1.15% |13634 | d...@virtualized.org 1.32% |2 | 1.10% |13000 | bcla...@cisco.com 1.32% |2 | 1.01% |11932 | l...@cisco.com 1.32% |2 | 0.89% |10500 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.66% |1 | 1.15% |13606 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.66% |1 | 1.07% |12720 | leo.liub...@huawei.com 0.66% |1 | 1.00% |11897 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.66% |1 | 0.97% |11460 | cb.li...@gmail.com 0.66% |1 | 0.95% |11263 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 0.66% |1 | 0.95% |11228 | hous...@vigilsec.com 0.66% |1 | 0.90% |10616 | tobias.gond...@gondrom.org 0.66% |1 | 0.86% |10205 | agma...@gmail.com 0.66% |1 | 0.74% | 8787 | superu...@gmail.com 0.66% |1 | 0.74% | 8716 | j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de 0.66% |1 | 0.68% | 8105 | b...@nostrum.com 0.66% |1 | 0.64% | 7568 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.66% |1 | 0.62% | 7387 | aeop...@gmail.com 0.66% |1 | 0.62% | 7308 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.66% |1 | 0.60% | 7137 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.66% |1 | 0.60% | 7108 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.66% |1 | 0.55% | 6518 | barryle...@computer.org 0.66% |1 | 0.52% | 6160 | s...@cisco.com 0.66% |1 | 0.52% | 6119 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 0.66% |1 | 0.51% | 6090 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.66% |1 | 0.51% | 6020 | thierry.mor...@connotech.com 0.66% |1 | 0.48% | 5682 | m...@sap.com 0.66% |1 | 0.48% | 5650 | pe...@akayla.com 0.66% |1 | 0.47% | 5562 | l...@pi.nu 0.66% |1 | 0.46% | 5476 | d...@ewellic.org 0.66% |1 | 0.43% | 5041 | ra...@psg.com 0.66% |1 | 0.41% | 4902 | malcolm.be...@zte.com.cn +--++--+ 100.00% | 151 |100.00% | 1185170 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 138 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri May 10 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.25% | 10 | 8.90% |93387 | ma...@isc.org 6.52% |9 | 7.85% |82311 | nar...@us.ibm.com 7.25% | 10 | 6.58% |69033 | john-i...@jck.com 4.35% |6 | 4.92% |51589 | sc...@kitterman.com 4.35% |6 | 3.90% |40851 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 4.35% |6 | 3.70% |38841 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 3.62% |5 | 3.33% |34916 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.90% |4 | 3.30% |34585 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 2.90% |4 | 3.27% |34333 | alh-i...@tndh.net 2.90% |4 | 3.06% |32061 | bcla...@cisco.com 2.90% |4 | 3.05% |31953 | daedu...@btconnect.com 2.90% |4 | 2.61% |27392 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 2.17% |3 | 2.15% |22521 | do...@dougbarton.us 2.17% |3 | 1.80% |18858 | joe...@bogus.com 2.17% |3 | 1.63% |17072 | wor...@ariadne.com 2.17% |3 | 1.43% |14970 | ra...@psg.com 1.45% |2 | 1.97% |20627 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 1.45% |2 | 1.48% |15501 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.45% |2 | 1.46% |15269 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.45% |2 | 1.43% |15015 | s...@resistor.net 1.45% |2 | 1.30% |13638 | s...@internet2.edu 1.45% |2 | 1.28% |13407 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.45% |2 | 1.25% |13073 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 1.45% |2 | 1.19% |12444 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.45% |2 | 1.16% |12116 | derhoe...@gmx.net 1.45% |2 | 1.15% |12093 | j...@jlc.net 1.45% |2 | 1.06% |11096 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.45% |2 | 1.05% |11035 | m...@sap.com 1.45% |2 | 1.04% |10900 | pe...@akayla.com 0.72% |1 | 1.61% |16854 | o...@nlnetlabs.nl 0.72% |1 | 1.58% |16521 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 0.72% |1 | 1.41% |14746 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 0.72% |1 | 1.02% |10730 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.72% |1 | 0.94% | 9817 | war...@kumari.net 0.72% |1 | 0.92% | 9697 | c...@daydream.com 0.72% |1 | 0.87% | 9082 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.72% |1 | 0.82% | 8628 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.72% |1 | 0.79% | 8334 | gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com 0.72% |1 | 0.78% | 8214 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.72% |1 | 0.73% | 7621 | jouni.nos...@gmail.com 0.72% |1 | 0.69% | 7232 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.72% |1 | 0.68% | 7184 | r...@rfc-editor.org 0.72% |1 | 0.68% | 7109 | superu...@gmail.com 0.72% |1 | 0.67% | 6977 | mcqui...@pobox.com 0.72% |1 | 0.63% | 6643 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 0.72% |1 | 0.62% | 6543 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.72% |1 | 0.62% | 6505 | barryle...@computer.org 0.72% |1 | 0.62% | 6475 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.72% |1 | 0.60% | 6336 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.72% |1 | 0.58% | 6130 | d...@dcrocker.net 0.72% |1 | 0.58% | 6070 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 0.72% |1 | 0.57% | 5934 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.72% |1 | 0.55% | 5817 | c...@tzi.org 0.72% |1 | 0.55% | 5765 | jo...@taugh.com 0.72% |1 | 0.55% | 5731 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 0.72% |1 | 0.53% | 5607 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.72% |1 | 0.53% | 5583 | env...@rolamasao.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 138 |100.00% | 1048772 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 226 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri May 3 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 7.08% | 16 | 6.62% | 118279 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.54% |8 | 3.01% |53739 | ves...@tana.it 3.54% |8 | 3.01% |53683 | ted.le...@nominum.com 3.10% |7 | 3.27% |58437 | mstjo...@comcast.net 2.65% |6 | 3.25% |58037 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.10% |7 | 2.78% |49615 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 2.65% |6 | 2.98% |53257 | ma...@isc.org 2.65% |6 | 2.63% |47042 | john-i...@jck.com 2.65% |6 | 2.25% |40249 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.65% |6 | 2.16% |38663 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 2.21% |5 | 2.52% |45015 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 1.33% |3 | 2.78% |49662 | bcla...@cisco.com 2.21% |5 | 1.82% |32465 | s...@resistor.net 1.77% |4 | 1.88% |33577 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.33% |3 | 2.29% |40956 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 1.77% |4 | 1.74% |31013 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 1.33% |3 | 2.17% |38828 | ron.even@gmail.com 1.77% |4 | 1.73% |30888 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.77% |4 | 1.70% |30432 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 1.33% |3 | 1.89% |33774 | m...@tail-f.com 1.77% |4 | 1.42% |25424 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.77% |4 | 1.39% |24880 | d...@virtualized.org 1.77% |4 | 1.32% |23552 | c...@tzi.org 1.77% |4 | 1.27% |22638 | ra...@psg.com 1.33% |3 | 1.51% |27063 | daedu...@btconnect.com 1.33% |3 | 1.47% |26319 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.33% |3 | 1.31% |23482 | huit...@microsoft.com 1.33% |3 | 1.19% |21193 | f...@cisco.com 0.88% |2 | 1.57% |27991 | superu...@gmail.com 1.33% |3 | 1.12% |20073 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.33% |3 | 1.08% |19212 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.88% |2 | 1.43% |25595 | v...@cisco.com 1.33% |3 | 0.99% |17645 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.88% |2 | 1.34% |23906 | david.bl...@emc.com 0.88% |2 | 1.10% |19607 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 0.88% |2 | 0.87% |15599 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.88% |2 | 0.86% |15394 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.88% |2 | 0.81% |14531 | petit...@acm.org 0.88% |2 | 0.81% |14489 | m...@lilacglade.org 0.88% |2 | 0.78% |13979 | s...@internet2.edu 0.88% |2 | 0.77% |13822 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.88% |2 | 0.73% |13020 | dhark...@lounge.org 0.88% |2 | 0.73% |12958 | joe...@bogus.com 0.88% |2 | 0.71% |12677 | sc...@kitterman.com 0.88% |2 | 0.71% |12675 | martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu 0.88% |2 | 0.70% |12569 | o...@cisco.com 0.44% |1 | 1.15% |20467 | cpign...@cisco.com 0.88% |2 | 0.70% |12419 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.88% |2 | 0.69% |12365 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.88% |2 | 0.67% |12024 | l...@netapp.com 0.88% |2 | 0.58% |10320 | francis.dup...@fdupont.fr 0.44% |1 | 0.91% |16207 | acoo...@cdt.org 0.44% |1 | 0.88% |15662 | l...@cisco.com 0.44% |1 | 0.76% |13588 | a...@yumaworks.com 0.44% |1 | 0.63% |11197 | leo.liub...@huawei.com 0.44% |1 | 0.58% |10389 | ed.le...@neustar.biz 0.44% |1 | 0.55% | 9818 | barryle...@computer.org 0.44% |1 | 0.49% | 8714 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.44% |1 | 0.49% | 8683 | jdr...@juniper.net 0.44% |1 | 0.48% | 8605 | johnsonhammo...@hushmail.com 0.44% |1 | 0.46% | 8216 | d...@1-4-5.net 0.44% |1 | 0.46% | 8174 | glenz...@gmail.com 0.44% |1 | 0.45% | 8012 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.44% |1 | 0.43% | 7678 | tb...@textuality.com 0.44% |1 | 0.41% | 7363 | j...@jlc.net 0.44% |1 | 0.41% | 7302 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.44% |1 | 0.40% | 7156 | allison.man...@gmail.com 0.44% |1 | 0.40% | 7127 | lho...@nic.cz 0.44% |1 | 0.38% | 6843 | aman...@verisign.com 0.44% |1 | 0.38% | 6814 | war...@kumari.net 0.44% |1 | 0.38% | 6754 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 0.44% |1 | 0.37% | 6694 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 0.44% |1 | 0.37% | 6533 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.44% |1 | 0.36% | 6419 | ch...@ietf.org 0.44% |1 | 0.36% | 6398 | lber...@labn.net 0.44% |1 | 0.36% | 6366 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 0.44% |1 | 0.34% | 6090 | otr...@employees.org 0.44% |1 | 0.34% | 6034 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.44% |1 | 0.34% | 6020 | josh.howl...@ja.net 0.44% |1 | 0.33% | 5967 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.44% |1 | 0.33% | 5946 | jo...@taugh.com 0.44% |1 | 0.33% | 5930 | derhoe...@gmx.net 0.44% |1 | 0.33% | 5909 | wor...@ariadne.com 0.44% |1 | 0.33% | 5895 | m...@mnot.net 0.44%
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 96 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 26 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 9.38% |9 | 8.36% |68598 | fg...@si6networks.com 4.17% |4 | 7.84% |64307 | ted.i...@gmail.com 6.25% |6 | 5.10% |41853 | s...@resistor.net 6.25% |6 | 4.86% |39849 | b...@nostrum.com 5.21% |5 | 4.74% |38860 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 4.17% |4 | 5.14% |42159 | daedu...@btconnect.com 5.21% |5 | 3.95% |32420 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.08% |2 | 4.95% |40562 | m...@lilacglade.org 1.04% |1 | 5.25% |43055 | salvatore.danto...@uniparthenope.it 3.12% |3 | 3.12% |25623 | y...@checkpoint.com 3.12% |3 | 3.09% |25359 | l...@cisco.com 3.12% |3 | 2.80% |22947 | huit...@microsoft.com 3.12% |3 | 2.65% |21705 | framefri...@gmail.com 3.12% |3 | 2.58% |21128 | nar...@us.ibm.com 2.08% |2 | 2.93% |23992 | andrewm...@gmail.com 2.08% |2 | 1.68% |13795 | l...@netapp.com 2.08% |2 | 1.44% |11814 | w...@1wt.eu 2.08% |2 | 1.43% |11695 | m...@sap.com 2.08% |2 | 1.42% |11617 | m...@mnot.net 2.08% |2 | 1.40% |11496 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 2.08% |2 | 1.32% |10857 | pe...@akayla.com 1.04% |1 | 1.64% |13459 | ietf...@comcast.net 1.04% |1 | 1.60% |13103 | kathleen.moria...@emc.com 1.04% |1 | 1.59% |13002 | sprom...@unina.it 1.04% |1 | 1.31% |10705 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.04% |1 | 1.09% | 8902 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.04% |1 | 1.06% | 8674 | clint.chap...@gmail.com 1.04% |1 | 1.05% | 8609 | markzzzsm...@yahoo.com.au 1.04% |1 | 1.05% | 8584 | tramm...@tik.ee.ethz.ch 1.04% |1 | 1.03% | 8408 | f...@cisco.com 1.04% |1 | 0.99% | 8080 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.04% |1 | 0.98% | 8075 | acoo...@cdt.org 1.04% |1 | 0.93% | 7630 | mstjo...@comcast.net 1.04% |1 | 0.90% | 7372 | d...@cridland.net 1.04% |1 | 0.86% | 7081 | p...@philkern.de 1.04% |1 | 0.83% | 6808 | rja.li...@gmail.com 1.04% |1 | 0.80% | 6531 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 1.04% |1 | 0.79% | 6441 | s...@internet2.edu 1.04% |1 | 0.77% | 6325 | d...@xpasc.com 1.04% |1 | 0.71% | 5859 | j...@joelhalpern.com 1.04% |1 | 0.71% | 5818 | to...@isi.edu 1.04% |1 | 0.70% | 5734 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.04% |1 | 0.69% | 5638 | ves...@tana.it 1.04% |1 | 0.67% | 5481 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.04% |1 | 0.64% | 5272 | i...@ietf.org 1.04% |1 | 0.60% | 4948 | jari.ar...@piuha.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 96 |100.00% | 820230 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 166 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 19 07:03:54 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 8.43% | 14 | 7.88% | 102717 | ted.le...@nominum.com 5.42% |9 | 6.32% |82361 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.82% |8 | 4.51% |58848 | dhark...@lounge.org 4.82% |8 | 4.28% |55809 | s...@resistor.net 4.22% |7 | 4.07% |53095 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 4.22% |7 | 3.69% |48105 | m...@sap.com 3.61% |6 | 3.55% |46274 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 3.01% |5 | 3.38% |44125 | daedu...@btconnect.com 3.01% |5 | 3.13% |40787 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 3.01% |5 | 3.04% |39685 | lber...@labn.net 3.01% |5 | 2.92% |38047 | l...@cisco.com 3.01% |5 | 2.68% |34928 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 3.01% |5 | 2.66% |34648 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 3.01% |5 | 2.65% |34524 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.41% |4 | 2.44% |31868 | ste...@aaa-sec.com 1.20% |2 | 3.22% |42039 | bcla...@cisco.com 2.41% |4 | 2.01% |26265 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 1.81% |3 | 2.27% |29558 | piy...@ditenity.com 1.81% |3 | 1.99% |25906 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.81% |3 | 1.89% |24681 | jmp...@cisco.com 1.81% |3 | 1.82% |23728 | h...@jpl.nasa.gov 1.81% |3 | 1.73% |22502 | eck...@cisco.com 1.81% |3 | 1.47% |19149 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 1.20% |2 | 1.58% |20620 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.20% |2 | 1.55% |20220 | jdr...@juniper.net 1.20% |2 | 1.34% |17510 | bmann...@isi.edu 1.20% |2 | 1.27% |16543 | mstjo...@comcast.net 1.20% |2 | 1.20% |15679 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 1.20% |2 | 1.16% |15161 | a...@yumaworks.com 1.20% |2 | 1.14% |14834 | f...@cisco.com 1.20% |2 | 1.10% |14370 | ptha...@broadcom.com 1.20% |2 | 1.07% |13969 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.20% |2 | 0.99% |12953 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 1.20% |2 | 0.96% |12572 | john-i...@jck.com 1.20% |2 | 0.93% |12070 | to...@isi.edu 1.20% |2 | 0.91% |11908 | wor...@ariadne.com 0.60% |1 | 1.15% |15015 | dcroc...@bbiw.net 0.60% |1 | 0.80% |10368 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.60% |1 | 0.78% |10163 | barryle...@computer.org 0.60% |1 | 0.77% |10025 | far...@umn.edu 0.60% |1 | 0.70% | 9176 | superu...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.70% | 9133 | sc...@kitterman.com 0.60% |1 | 0.66% | 8599 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.60% |1 | 0.62% | 8134 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.60% |1 | 0.61% | 7946 | huit...@microsoft.com 0.60% |1 | 0.60% | 7832 | d...@dcrocker.net 0.60% |1 | 0.54% | 7019 | d...@xpasc.com 0.60% |1 | 0.52% | 6823 | c...@tzi.org 0.60% |1 | 0.52% | 6816 | rpellet...@isoc.org 0.60% |1 | 0.47% | 6089 | kl...@wierenga.net 0.60% |1 | 0.45% | 5838 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.60% |1 | 0.44% | 5798 | klen...@jck.com 0.60% |1 | 0.44% | 5796 | johannes.mer...@secunet.com 0.60% |1 | 0.42% | 5437 | j...@jlc.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 166 |100.00% | 1304065 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 19 07:07:07 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ +--++--+
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 19 00:53:03 EDT 2013
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 173 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 12 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.20% |9 | 4.70% |62873 | ted.le...@nominum.com 4.05% |7 | 3.16% |42214 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.47% |6 | 3.18% |42603 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.47% |6 | 2.64% |35325 | mo...@network-heretics.com 2.89% |5 | 3.02% |40419 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.89% |5 | 2.68% |35849 | eck...@cisco.com 2.89% |5 | 2.41% |32184 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 2.31% |4 | 2.96% |39570 | d...@cridland.net 2.89% |5 | 2.38% |31793 | mansa...@besserwisser.org 2.89% |5 | 2.36% |31626 | y...@checkpoint.com 2.31% |4 | 2.81% |37617 | stbry...@cisco.com 2.31% |4 | 2.72% |36426 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 2.89% |5 | 2.14% |28671 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.31% |4 | 2.70% |36191 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 1.16% |2 | 3.32% |44357 | turn...@ieca.com 2.31% |4 | 2.10% |28067 | pe...@akayla.com 2.31% |4 | 2.09% |28013 | hous...@vigilsec.com 2.31% |4 | 2.02% |27017 | jo...@taugh.com 2.31% |4 | 1.89% |25239 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.31% |4 | 1.86% |24847 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.31% |4 | 1.79% |24011 | bra...@isi.edu 0.58% |1 | 3.52% |47129 | acoo...@cdt.org 0.58% |1 | 3.28% |43830 | c...@tzi.org 1.73% |3 | 1.55% |20695 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 1.73% |3 | 1.35% |18113 | s...@resistor.net 1.73% |3 | 1.34% |17886 | to...@isi.edu 1.73% |3 | 1.30% |17378 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 1.16% |2 | 1.85% |24715 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.58% |1 | 2.06% |27500 | salvatore.danto...@uniparthenope.it 1.16% |2 | 1.39% |18635 | d...@1-4-5.net 1.16% |2 | 1.07% |14250 | barryle...@computer.org 0.58% |1 | 1.52% |20327 | r...@ipv.sx 1.16% |2 | 0.93% |12499 | s...@internet2.edu 1.16% |2 | 0.89% |11864 | wbee...@cisco.com 1.16% |2 | 0.88% |11751 | n...@cryptonector.com 1.16% |2 | 0.87% |11653 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.16% |2 | 0.82% |10914 | l...@pi.nu 1.16% |2 | 0.81% |10839 | rpellet...@isoc.org 1.16% |2 | 0.79% |10635 | st...@shinkuro.com 0.58% |1 | 0.90% |12015 | ka...@mit.edu 0.58% |1 | 0.86% |11529 | j...@wide.ad.jp 0.58% |1 | 0.76% |10179 | ptha...@broadcom.com 0.58% |1 | 0.74% | 9943 | ulr...@herberg.name 0.58% |1 | 0.66% | 8804 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.58% |1 | 0.66% | 8788 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.58% |1 | 0.63% | 8368 | joe...@bogus.com 0.58% |1 | 0.58% | 7773 | piy...@ditenity.com 0.58% |1 | 0.58% | 7727 | mstjo...@comcast.net 0.58% |1 | 0.58% | 7705 | far...@umn.edu 0.58% |1 | 0.56% | 7530 | ste...@aaa-sec.com 0.58% |1 | 0.56% | 7521 | john-i...@jck.com 0.58% |1 | 0.54% | 7207 | f...@cisco.com 0.58% |1 | 0.50% | 6688 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.58% |1 | 0.50% | 6629 | jcur...@istaff.org 0.58% |1 | 0.50% | 6624 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.58% |1 | 0.49% | 6590 | j...@jlc.net 0.58% |1 | 0.49% | 6560 | superu...@gmail.com 0.58% |1 | 0.48% | 6389 | m...@lilacglade.org 0.58% |1 | 0.47% | 6275 | h...@shrubbery.net 0.58% |1 | 0.47% | 6254 | jmp...@cisco.com 0.58% |1 | 0.47% | 6244 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 0.58% |1 | 0.45% | 6060 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.58% |1 | 0.45% | 5999 | h...@jpl.nasa.gov 0.58% |1 | 0.45% | 5975 | ch...@ietf.org 0.58% |1 | 0.44% | 5833 | war...@kumari.net 0.58% |1 | 0.43% | 5734 | tnad...@lucidvision.com 0.58% |1 | 0.41% | 5543 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.58% |1 | 0.41% | 5491 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.58% |1 | 0.41% | 5461 | d...@xpasc.com 0.58% |1 | 0.40% | 5416 | yaronf.i...@gmail.com 0.58% |1 | 0.40% | 5309 | m...@mnot.net 0.58% |1 | 0.35% | 4695 | j...@jck.com 0.58% |1 | 0.35% | 4657 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.58% |1 | 0.34% | 4591 | lly...@civil-tongue.net 0.58% |1 | 0.34% | 4529 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.58% |1 | 0.29% | 3832 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 173 |100.00% | 1337992 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 99 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 5 00:53:06 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.06% |6 | 5.52% |45474 | s...@resistor.net 5.05% |5 | 4.08% |33620 | fg...@si6networks.com 4.04% |4 | 3.92% |32357 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 3.03% |3 | 4.87% |40120 | stbry...@cisco.com 4.04% |4 | 3.55% |29304 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.03% |3 | 4.16% |34318 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 3.03% |3 | 4.14% |34139 | david.bl...@emc.com 4.04% |4 | 2.95% |24285 | ted.le...@nominum.com 4.04% |4 | 2.93% |24153 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.02% |2 | 3.60% |29693 | luf...@cisco.com 3.03% |3 | 2.23% |18352 | do...@dougbarton.us 3.03% |3 | 2.05% |16875 | hous...@vigilsec.com 2.02% |2 | 2.97% |24450 | leo.liub...@huawei.com 1.01% |1 | 3.82% |31525 | michael.sch...@alcatel-lucent.com 1.01% |1 | 3.17% |26096 | piy...@ditenity.com 2.02% |2 | 2.08% |17186 | ebur...@cs.georgetown.edu 2.02% |2 | 2.02% |16651 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.02% |2 | 1.84% |15189 | mstjo...@comcast.net 2.02% |2 | 1.82% |15024 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.02% |2 | 1.63% |13472 | huit...@microsoft.com 2.02% |2 | 1.63% |13447 | susiel...@gmail.com 2.02% |2 | 1.62% |13386 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 2.02% |2 | 1.47% |12151 | jo...@taugh.com 2.02% |2 | 1.43% |11783 | swm...@swm.pp.se 2.02% |2 | 1.37% |11282 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 1.01% |1 | 1.90% |15665 | r...@ipv.sx 1.01% |1 | 1.40% |11523 | paul.doo...@nsn.com 1.01% |1 | 1.26% |10393 | scott.mansfi...@ericsson.com 1.01% |1 | 1.20% | 9904 | mike5...@gmail.com 1.01% |1 | 1.16% | 9571 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.01% |1 | 1.14% | 9362 | drafts1...@yahoo.co.uk 1.01% |1 | 1.12% | 9220 | d.r...@rocketmail.com 1.01% |1 | 1.11% | 9186 | tom.hay...@netapp.com 1.01% |1 | 1.11% | 9167 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 1.01% |1 | 1.06% | 8737 | t...@att.com 1.01% |1 | 1.02% | 8429 | thierry.mor...@connotech.com 1.01% |1 | 0.96% | 7908 | john-i...@jck.com 1.01% |1 | 0.95% | 7853 | j...@joelhalpern.com 1.01% |1 | 0.89% | 7378 | n...@cryptonector.com 1.01% |1 | 0.87% | 7176 | ka...@mit.edu 1.01% |1 | 0.85% | 7014 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 1.01% |1 | 0.84% | 6896 | david.kess...@nsn.com 1.01% |1 | 0.83% | 6879 | jason_living...@cable.comcast.com 1.01% |1 | 0.83% | 6873 | hsan...@santronics.com 1.01% |1 | 0.81% | 6678 | c...@tzi.org 1.01% |1 | 0.79% | 6540 | ste...@aaa-sec.com 1.01% |1 | 0.78% | 6462 | s...@venaas.com 1.01% |1 | 0.75% | 6214 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.01% |1 | 0.74% | 6122 | jcur...@istaff.org 1.01% |1 | 0.74% | 6066 | s...@internet2.edu 1.01% |1 | 0.73% | 5981 | joe...@bogus.com 1.01% |1 | 0.70% | 5764 | yangkun2...@gmail.com 1.01% |1 | 0.68% | 5607 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 1.01% |1 | 0.66% | 5461 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.01% |1 | 0.65% | 5367 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.01% |1 | 0.57% | 4666 | wjh...@hardakers.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 99 |100.00% | 824394 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 159 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Mar 29 00:53:02 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 8.18% | 13 | 18.77% | 304221 | ste...@aaa-sec.com 6.29% | 10 | 9.61% | 155782 | david.bl...@emc.com 8.81% | 14 | 6.03% |97768 | m...@sap.com 6.92% | 11 | 5.95% |96509 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 8.46% | 137043 | denis.i...@free.fr 5.03% |8 | 3.14% |50848 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.77% |6 | 2.62% |42508 | john-i...@jck.com 3.14% |5 | 2.23% |36120 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 3.14% |5 | 2.02% |32765 | c...@tzi.org 3.14% |5 | 1.88% |30418 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.52% |4 | 1.95% |31617 | hsan...@isdg.net 2.52% |4 | 1.83% |29649 | j...@joelhalpern.com 2.52% |4 | 1.72% |27886 | s...@resistor.net 2.52% |4 | 1.53% |24814 | jcur...@istaff.org 1.89% |3 | 1.52% |24716 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.89% |3 | 1.43% |23210 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.26% |2 | 1.76% |28454 | doug.mtv...@gmail.com 1.89% |3 | 1.12% |18137 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.26% |2 | 1.67% |27029 | i...@jiaziyi.com 1.26% |2 | 1.39% |22609 | joel.halp...@ericsson.com 1.26% |2 | 1.04% |16820 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.26% |2 | 0.94% |15243 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.26% |2 | 0.92% |14871 | david.kess...@nsn.com 1.26% |2 | 0.91% |14825 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.26% |2 | 0.86% |14005 | d...@xpasc.com 1.26% |2 | 0.84% |13558 | mo...@network-heretics.com 1.26% |2 | 0.77% |12433 | m...@lilacglade.org 1.26% |2 | 0.75% |12226 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.26% |2 | 0.72% |11600 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.63% |1 | 0.90% |14640 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.72% |11655 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.63% |1 | 0.71% |11508 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.69% |11151 | d...@cridland.net 0.63% |1 | 0.66% |10635 | mstjo...@comcast.net 0.63% |1 | 0.58% | 9352 | jmh.dir...@joelhalpern.com 0.63% |1 | 0.55% | 8848 | jdr...@juniper.net 0.63% |1 | 0.54% | 8822 | dean.ch...@huawei.com 0.63% |1 | 0.52% | 8470 | ulr...@herberg.name 0.63% |1 | 0.51% | 8199 | glenz...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.48% | 7796 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.63% |1 | 0.48% | 7751 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.63% |1 | 0.48% | 7708 | li...@cs.ucla.edu 0.63% |1 | 0.47% | 7651 | l...@pi.nu 0.63% |1 | 0.47% | 7621 | ebur...@cs.georgetown.edu 0.63% |1 | 0.47% | 7593 | huit...@microsoft.com 0.63% |1 | 0.46% | 7376 | b...@nostrum.com 0.63% |1 | 0.44% | 7175 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.44% | 7153 | turn...@ieca.com 0.63% |1 | 0.43% | 7014 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.63% |1 | 0.42% | 6791 | joe...@bogus.com 0.63% |1 | 0.41% | 6694 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.63% |1 | 0.41% | 6689 | sc...@kitterman.com 0.63% |1 | 0.40% | 6468 | iab-ch...@iab.org 0.63% |1 | 0.39% | 6373 | s...@internet2.edu 0.63% |1 | 0.39% | 6300 | sak...@tanu.org 0.63% |1 | 0.38% | 6203 | yd...@cs.helsinki.fi 0.63% |1 | 0.38% | 6132 | war...@kumari.net 0.63% |1 | 0.38% | 6097 | m...@mrp.net 0.63% |1 | 0.37% | 5958 | fg...@si6networks.com 0.63% |1 | 0.36% | 5879 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 0.63% |1 | 0.34% | 5436 | to...@isi.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 159 |100.00% | 1620822 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 246 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Mar 22 00:53:03 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.88% | 12 | 6.03% | 128365 | d...@dcrocker.net 0.41% |1 | 9.07% | 192830 | f...@clock.org 3.25% |8 | 2.77% |58870 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 5.55% | 117980 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 3.25% |8 | 2.62% |55680 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.85% |7 | 2.69% |57279 | s...@resistor.net 3.25% |8 | 2.28% |48556 | jh...@pfrc.org 2.85% |7 | 2.55% |54171 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 2.85% |7 | 2.45% |52196 | john-i...@jck.com 2.85% |7 | 2.22% |47243 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 2.85% |7 | 2.11% |44918 | morrowc.li...@gmail.com 2.44% |6 | 1.78% |37880 | m...@sap.com 2.03% |5 | 1.66% |35308 | mo...@network-heretics.com 1.63% |4 | 1.95% |41580 | far...@umn.edu 2.03% |5 | 1.52% |32308 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.63% |4 | 1.90% |40312 | pau...@packetizer.com 2.03% |5 | 1.46% |31091 | jo...@taugh.com 1.63% |4 | 1.62% |34562 | tglas...@earthlink.net 1.63% |4 | 1.58% |33691 | jcur...@istaff.org 1.22% |3 | 1.75% |37246 | sprom...@unina.it 1.63% |4 | 1.24% |26325 | s...@internet2.edu 1.63% |4 | 1.19% |25366 | b...@nostrum.com 1.63% |4 | 1.16% |24673 | fgalie...@gmail.com 1.63% |4 | 1.15% |24470 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.63% |4 | 1.14% |24175 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.63% |4 | 1.10% |23358 | swm...@swm.pp.se 1.63% |4 | 0.96% |20494 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.22% |3 | 1.19% |25212 | f...@cisco.com 1.22% |3 | 1.15% |24469 | galvin+i...@elistx.com 1.22% |3 | 1.14% |24179 | ebur...@standardstrack.com 1.22% |3 | 1.01% |21428 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 1.22% |3 | 0.99% |20952 | dhark...@lounge.org 1.22% |3 | 0.90% |19124 | l...@cisco.com 1.22% |3 | 0.84% |17887 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.22% |3 | 0.83% |17733 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.22% |3 | 0.82% |17466 | o...@cisco.com 0.81% |2 | 1.05% |22230 | r...@ipv.sx 0.81% |2 | 0.83% |17648 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.81% |2 | 0.82% |17408 | dhruv.i...@gmail.com 0.81% |2 | 0.77% |16361 | acoo...@cdt.org 0.81% |2 | 0.73% |15463 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 0.81% |2 | 0.72% |15290 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.81% |2 | 0.71% |15003 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.41% |1 | 1.10% |23483 | salvatore.danto...@uniparthenope.it 0.81% |2 | 0.66% |14057 | d...@cridland.net 0.81% |2 | 0.63% |13318 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.81% |2 | 0.61% |13020 | barryle...@computer.org 0.81% |2 | 0.59% |12536 | ra...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.81% |2 | 0.57% |12176 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.81% |2 | 0.57% |12117 | m...@lilacglade.org 0.81% |2 | 0.54% |11487 | m...@sandelman.ca 0.81% |2 | 0.54% |11442 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.81% |2 | 0.52% |11068 | c...@tzi.org 0.41% |1 | 0.78% |16615 | bcla...@cisco.com 0.41% |1 | 0.57% |12083 | i.g...@comcast.net 0.41% |1 | 0.55% |11771 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.41% |1 | 0.55% |11723 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.41% |1 | 0.52% |10995 | henning.schulzri...@fcc.gov 0.41% |1 | 0.47% |10052 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.45% | 9514 | jonne.soini...@renesasmobile.com 0.41% |1 | 0.44% | 9349 | j...@mit.edu 0.41% |1 | 0.44% | 9257 | cntre...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.43% | 9098 | mmor...@cisco.com 0.41% |1 | 0.42% | 8917 | ray.bel...@nominet.org.uk 0.41% |1 | 0.40% | 8613 | mstjo...@comcast.net 0.41% |1 | 0.39% | 8236 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.41% |1 | 0.39% | 8207 | j...@jlc.net 0.41% |1 | 0.35% | 7437 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.35% | 7355 | r...@netapp.com 0.41% |1 | 0.34% | 7127 | d...@virtualized.org 0.41% |1 | 0.33% | 7086 | t...@att.com 0.41% |1 | 0.33% | 6984 | eck...@cisco.com 0.41% |1 | 0.33% | 6937 | health...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.31% | 6683 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.31% | 6584 | lber...@labn.net 0.41% |1 | 0.30% | 6472 | alexey.melni...@isode.com 0.41% |1 | 0.30% | 6443 | rog...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.30% | 6356 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.41% |1 | 0.30% | 6290 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.41% |1 | 0.29% | 6173 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 0.41% |1 | 0.29% | 6170 | sak...@tanu.org 0.41% |1 | 0.29% | 6094 | ebur...@cs.georgetown.edu 0.41% |1 | 0.28% | 6017 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.41% |1 | 0.28% |
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 264 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Mar 15 00:53:08 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.30% | 14 | 4.47% | 108106 | ra...@qti.qualcomm.com 4.92% | 13 | 3.81% |92151 | john-i...@jck.com 3.41% |9 | 5.07% | 122709 | mstjo...@comcast.net 4.17% | 11 | 3.83% |92531 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 4.55% | 12 | 3.11% |75252 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 3.79% | 10 | 2.94% |71149 | s...@internet2.edu 0.38% |1 | 6.30% | 152389 | seragamsouve...@gmail.com 3.03% |8 | 3.63% |87718 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.52% |4 | 3.89% |94005 | eric.g...@ericsson.com 2.65% |7 | 2.65% |64000 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 3.03% |8 | 2.21% |53520 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.89% |5 | 2.10% |50726 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.89% |5 | 1.66% |40237 | marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca 1.89% |5 | 1.65% |39871 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.89% |5 | 1.36% |32894 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.89% |5 | 1.35% |32769 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.89% |5 | 1.35% |32640 | ted.le...@nominum.com 1.89% |5 | 1.32% |31899 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 1.14% |3 | 1.83% |44144 | sam.a.cro...@gmail.com 1.52% |4 | 1.35% |32609 | dhark...@lounge.org 1.52% |4 | 1.23% |29663 | m...@lilacglade.org 1.14% |3 | 1.51% |36542 | eck...@cisco.com 1.52% |4 | 1.03% |24843 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 1.52% |4 | 1.01% |24366 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 1.14% |3 | 1.28% |30866 | flu...@iii.ca 1.52% |4 | 0.81% |19559 | i...@meetecho.com 1.14% |3 | 1.09% |26307 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 1.14% |3 | 1.05% |25404 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 1.14% |3 | 1.03% |24963 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 1.14% |3 | 0.98% |23649 | f...@cisco.com 1.14% |3 | 0.94% |22844 | droma...@avaya.com 1.14% |3 | 0.85% |20468 | jo...@taugh.com 1.14% |3 | 0.84% |20435 | l...@netapp.com 1.14% |3 | 0.79% |18989 | stpe...@stpeter.im 1.14% |3 | 0.75% |18181 | aser...@lacnic.net 1.14% |3 | 0.73% |17646 | mo...@network-heretics.com 0.76% |2 | 1.00% |24170 | superu...@gmail.com 0.76% |2 | 0.72% |17423 | har...@alvestrand.no 0.76% |2 | 0.68% |16552 | nomcom-ch...@ietf.org 0.76% |2 | 0.66% |16028 | martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu 0.76% |2 | 0.63% |15341 | tramm...@tik.ee.ethz.ch 0.76% |2 | 0.58% |14023 | jab...@hopcount.ca 0.76% |2 | 0.58% |14022 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.76% |2 | 0.57% |13709 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.38% |1 | 0.93% |22535 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.93% |22480 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 0.38% |1 | 0.91% |21993 | l...@cisco.com 0.38% |1 | 0.91% |21987 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 0.76% |2 | 0.52% |12598 | amor...@amsl.com 0.38% |1 | 0.87% |21029 | dbharring...@comcast.net 0.76% |2 | 0.49% |11764 | war...@kumari.net 0.76% |2 | 0.46% |11036 | p...@nohats.ca 0.76% |2 | 0.44% |10711 | joe...@bogus.com 0.38% |1 | 0.76% |18497 | ietf.divers...@gmail.com 0.76% |2 | 0.37% | 8856 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 0.38% |1 | 0.74% |18009 | r...@ipv.sx 0.38% |1 | 0.74% |17924 | suresh.krish...@ericsson.com 0.38% |1 | 0.74% |17791 | mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 0.38% |1 | 0.68% |16423 | falsehood...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.66% |16053 | nkuk...@verilan.com 0.38% |1 | 0.65% |15750 | pe...@akayla.com 0.38% |1 | 0.62% |14931 | grm...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.52% |12630 | bonnie.l.gor...@boeing.com 0.38% |1 | 0.47% |11372 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.38% |1 | 0.39% | 9316 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 0.38% |1 | 0.37% | 8896 | keith.dr...@alcatel-lucent.com 0.38% |1 | 0.37% | 8878 | turchanyi.g...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.36% | 8745 | cb.li...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.36% | 8680 | d...@cridland.net 0.38% |1 | 0.35% | 8527 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 0.38% |1 | 0.35% | 8370 | andrewm...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.34% | 8272 | ch...@ietf.org 0.38% |1 | 0.34% | 8248 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.38% |1 | 0.32% | 7809 | sm...@cardiff.ac.uk 0.38% |1 | 0.31% | 7569 | eburge...@standardstrack.com 0.38% |1 | 0.31% | 7481 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.30% | 7242 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.29% | 7122 | kawamu...@mesh.ad.jp 0.38% |1 | 0.28% | 6863 | wor...@ariadne.com 0.38% |1 | 0.28% | 6841 | ptha...@broadcom.com 0.38% |1 | 0.28% | 6770 | mlepinski.i...@gmail.com 0.38% |1 | 0.28% | 6714 | j...@jlc.net 0.38% |1 | 0.27% |
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 316 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Mar 8 00:53:03 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 5.70% | 18 | 6.08% | 142470 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 4.43% | 14 | 5.14% | 120543 | daedu...@btconnect.com 4.43% | 14 | 4.10% |96176 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 4.43% | 14 | 4.01% |93927 | l...@netapp.com 4.43% | 14 | 3.91% |91781 | d...@dcrocker.net 3.80% | 12 | 4.31% | 101097 | eric.g...@ericsson.com 4.11% | 13 | 3.86% |90442 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 2.85% |9 | 2.79% |65305 | eck...@cisco.com 2.22% |7 | 2.57% |60200 | martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu 2.22% |7 | 2.42% |56812 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.90% |6 | 1.88% |44168 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.58% |5 | 2.19% |51370 | ebur...@standardstrack.com 1.90% |6 | 1.77% |41393 | m...@lilacglade.org 1.90% |6 | 1.68% |39503 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.90% |6 | 1.64% |38543 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.58% |5 | 1.64% |38365 | l.w...@surrey.ac.uk 1.58% |5 | 1.46% |34280 | l...@cisco.com 1.58% |5 | 1.39% |32509 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 1.27% |4 | 1.63% |38333 | j...@jlc.net 1.27% |4 | 1.22% |28615 | s...@resistor.net 0.95% |3 | 1.53% |35928 | jdr...@juniper.net 1.27% |4 | 1.20% |28106 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 1.27% |4 | 1.14% |26756 | david.kess...@nsn.com 1.27% |4 | 1.13% |26569 | s...@internet2.edu 1.27% |4 | 1.13% |26404 | joe...@bogus.com 1.27% |4 | 1.07% |25060 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.27% |4 | 1.05% |24709 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.95% |3 | 1.30% |30558 | grm...@gmail.com 0.95% |3 | 1.23% |28897 | mstjo...@comcast.net 1.27% |4 | 0.88% |20733 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.95% |3 | 0.97% |22782 | john-i...@jck.com 0.95% |3 | 0.89% |20845 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 0.95% |3 | 0.87% |20476 | allison.man...@gmail.com 0.95% |3 | 0.86% |20051 | to...@isi.edu 0.95% |3 | 0.85% |19902 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.95% |3 | 0.85% |19876 | w...@mti-systems.com 0.95% |3 | 0.84% |19754 | c...@tzi.org 0.95% |3 | 0.84% |19598 | bcla...@cisco.com 0.95% |3 | 0.77% |17952 | jo...@taugh.com 0.95% |3 | 0.76% |17817 | m...@sap.com 0.95% |3 | 0.70% |16454 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 0.63% |2 | 0.96% |22455 | sprom...@unina.it 0.32% |1 | 1.14% |26814 | elw...@folly.org.uk 0.63% |2 | 0.81% |18893 | cb.li...@gmail.com 0.63% |2 | 0.79% |18591 | jo...@iecc.com 0.63% |2 | 0.79% |18442 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 0.63% |2 | 0.75% |17492 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.63% |2 | 0.69% |16167 | stbry...@cisco.com 0.63% |2 | 0.68% |16000 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.63% |2 | 0.66% |15561 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 0.63% |2 | 0.65% |15209 | ted.i...@gmail.com 0.63% |2 | 0.63% |14871 | h...@cs.columbia.edu 0.63% |2 | 0.62% |14534 | f...@cisco.com 0.63% |2 | 0.59% |13839 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 0.63% |2 | 0.55% |12810 | d...@xpasc.com 0.63% |2 | 0.55% |12796 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 0.63% |2 | 0.54% |12677 | simon.lei...@switch.ch 0.63% |2 | 0.53% |12343 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.63% |2 | 0.53% |12329 | swm...@swm.pp.se 0.63% |2 | 0.49% |11398 | bra...@isi.edu 0.63% |2 | 0.48% |11369 | hen...@levkowetz.com 0.63% |2 | 0.48% |11206 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.63% |2 | 0.47% |11043 | ra...@psg.com 0.32% |1 | 0.45% |10463 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.32% |1 | 0.44% |10273 | acee.lin...@ericsson.com 0.32% |1 | 0.42% | 9798 | sam.a.cro...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.40% | 9303 | rstruik@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.37% | 8603 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.36% | 8455 | droma...@avaya.com 0.32% |1 | 0.36% | 8418 | l...@pi.nu 0.32% |1 | 0.35% | 8304 | sarikaya2...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.35% | 8113 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 0.32% |1 | 0.34% | 8082 | go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk 0.32% |1 | 0.33% | 7778 | leaf.yeh@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.32% | 7603 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.32% | 7545 | berti...@bwijnen.net 0.32% |1 | 0.32% | 7456 | gjs...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.31% | 7298 | akat...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.30% | 7014 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.32% |1 | 0.29% | 6723 | ra...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.32% |1 | 0.29% | 6683 | jh...@pfrc.org 0.32% |1 | 0.28% | 6659 | hal...@gmail.com 0.32% |1 | 0.28% | 6626 | war...@kumari.net 0.32% |1 | 0.28% | 6500 | rog...@gmail.com
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 164 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Mar 1 00:53:03 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.88% |8 | 5.91% |73893 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 3.66% |6 | 5.37% |67104 | hsan...@isdg.net 3.66% |6 | 4.88% |60980 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 3.66% |6 | 3.53% |44167 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.66% |6 | 3.46% |43216 | s...@resistor.net 3.66% |6 | 3.27% |40959 | petit...@acm.org 3.66% |6 | 3.12% |38970 | aser...@lacnic.net 2.44% |4 | 3.12% |39059 | grm...@gmail.com 3.05% |5 | 2.49% |31099 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.05% |5 | 2.37% |29661 | wor...@ariadne.com 2.44% |4 | 2.52% |31523 | jmp...@cisco.com 1.83% |3 | 2.93% |36630 | d...@ewellic.org 2.44% |4 | 2.31% |28836 | joe...@bogus.com 1.83% |3 | 2.87% |35852 | acoo...@cdt.org 2.44% |4 | 2.05% |25592 | war...@kumari.net 1.22% |2 | 2.80% |34990 | i...@thomasclausen.org 1.83% |3 | 1.61% |20190 | sc...@kitterman.com 1.22% |2 | 2.14% |26777 | sprom...@unina.it 1.22% |2 | 1.76% |21986 | ra...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.22% |2 | 1.24% |15565 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.22% |2 | 1.19% |14893 | f...@cisco.com 1.22% |2 | 1.18% |14804 | tramm...@tik.ee.ethz.ch 1.22% |2 | 1.15% |14423 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 1.22% |2 | 1.11% |13924 | m...@mnot.net 1.22% |2 | 1.09% |13631 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 1.22% |2 | 1.05% |13167 | c...@tzi.org 1.22% |2 | 1.02% |12793 | hen...@levkowetz.com 1.22% |2 | 1.02% |12784 | stefan.win...@restena.lu 1.22% |2 | 1.00% |12503 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 1.22% |2 | 0.99% |12424 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.22% |2 | 0.98% |12273 | pau...@packetizer.com 1.22% |2 | 0.98% |12230 | to...@isi.edu 1.22% |2 | 0.97% |12177 | michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de 1.22% |2 | 0.96% |12029 | cy...@daboo.name 1.22% |2 | 0.96% |12002 | l...@cisco.com 1.22% |2 | 0.92% |11521 | alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com 1.22% |2 | 0.92% |11464 | d...@dotat.at 1.22% |2 | 0.88% |10962 | m...@lilacglade.org 1.22% |2 | 0.87% |10872 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 1.22% |2 | 0.84% |10462 | ra...@psg.com 1.22% |2 | 0.83% |10404 | m...@sap.com 0.61% |1 | 0.93% |11579 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 0.61% |1 | 0.88% |11004 | ed.le...@neustar.biz 0.61% |1 | 0.79% | 9863 | r...@ipv.sx 0.61% |1 | 0.73% | 9159 | b...@google.com 0.61% |1 | 0.72% | 8993 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.67% | 8331 | barryle...@computer.org 0.61% |1 | 0.66% | 8260 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.61% |1 | 0.61% | 7667 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.61% |1 | 0.59% | 7429 | falsehood...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.58% | 7315 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.61% |1 | 0.57% | 7184 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.61% |1 | 0.56% | 6989 | mehmet.er...@nsn.com 0.61% |1 | 0.55% | 6927 | victor.kuarsi...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.55% | 6835 | j...@jlc.net 0.61% |1 | 0.54% | 6803 | d...@cridland.net 0.61% |1 | 0.54% | 6796 | john-i...@jck.com 0.61% |1 | 0.53% | 6668 | t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk 0.61% |1 | 0.53% | 6573 | john+i...@jck.com 0.61% |1 | 0.53% | 6568 | mo...@network-heretics.com 0.61% |1 | 0.52% | 6506 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.51% | 6396 | kl...@cisco.com 0.61% |1 | 0.51% | 6364 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.61% |1 | 0.51% | 6361 | ma...@isc.org 0.61% |1 | 0.49% | 6089 | glenz...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.48% | 6066 | dorama...@gmail.com 0.61% |1 | 0.48% | 5958 | rwfra...@acm.org 0.61% |1 | 0.47% | 5818 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.61% |1 | 0.46% | 5721 | n...@inex.ie 0.61% |1 | 0.45% | 5581 | b...@nostrum.com 0.61% |1 | 0.45% | 5579 | jo...@taugh.com 0.61% |1 | 0.42% | 5243 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com 0.61% |1 | 0.40% | 5055 | sust...@250bpm.com 0.61% |1 | 0.38% | 4790 | ch...@ietf.org 0.61% |1 | 0.38% | 4763 | internet-dra...@ietf.org 0.61% |1 | 0.38% | 4729 | ietf-secretar...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 164 |100.00% | 1250753 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 60 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Feb 22 00:53:02 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 3.33% |2 | 16.69% |80360 | roland.bl...@kit.edu 6.67% |4 | 6.60% |31766 | rpellet...@isoc.org 6.67% |4 | 4.86% |23392 | to...@isi.edu 6.67% |4 | 4.14% |19919 | p...@frobbit.se 5.00% |3 | 4.17% |20050 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 5.00% |3 | 4.09% |19692 | john-i...@jck.com 3.33% |2 | 4.57% |22005 | hal...@gmail.com 3.33% |2 | 3.17% |15244 | mo...@network-heretics.com 3.33% |2 | 3.06% |14749 | s...@resistor.net 3.33% |2 | 2.82% |13596 | war...@kumari.net 3.33% |2 | 2.68% |12916 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 3.33% |2 | 2.61% |12573 | amor...@amsl.com 3.33% |2 | 2.44% |11749 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.33% |2 | 2.06% | 9928 | ra...@psg.com 1.67% |1 | 2.79% |13424 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.67% |1 | 2.55% |12273 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.67% |1 | 1.99% | 9580 | b...@google.com 1.67% |1 | 1.93% | 9300 | tterr...@xiph.org 1.67% |1 | 1.85% | 8902 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.67% |1 | 1.74% | 8375 | ma...@isc.org 1.67% |1 | 1.71% | 8226 | d...@cridland.net 1.67% |1 | 1.50% | 7229 | d3e...@gmail.com 1.67% |1 | 1.48% | 7125 | mcqui...@pobox.com 1.67% |1 | 1.45% | 6976 | joe...@bogus.com 1.67% |1 | 1.44% | 6916 | listse...@me.com 1.67% |1 | 1.42% | 6817 | wesley.geo...@twcable.com 1.67% |1 | 1.37% | 6579 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 1.67% |1 | 1.35% | 6504 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.67% |1 | 1.29% | 6226 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.67% |1 | 1.22% | 5872 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 1.67% |1 | 1.21% | 5822 | l...@netapp.com 1.67% |1 | 1.15% | 5552 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 1.67% |1 | 1.14% | 5470 | o...@cisco.com 1.67% |1 | 1.14% | 5467 | eburge...@standardstrack.com 1.67% |1 | 1.14% | 5465 | bortzme...@nic.fr 1.67% |1 | 1.13% | 5441 | s...@cs.columbia.edu 1.67% |1 | 1.03% | 4959 | m...@sap.com 1.67% |1 | 1.02% | 4924 | internet-dra...@ietf.org +--++--+ 100.00% | 60 |100.00% | 481363 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 101 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Feb 15 00:53:02 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 14.85% | 15 | 13.68% | 130635 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 8.91% |9 | 7.09% |67750 | s...@resistor.net 6.93% |7 | 7.53% |71897 | ulr...@herberg.name 1.98% |2 | 11.39% | 108741 | amanc...@google.com 4.95% |5 | 3.39% |32338 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 3.96% |4 | 2.93% |27951 | mo...@network-heretics.com 2.97% |3 | 2.89% |27580 | jari.ar...@piuha.net 2.97% |3 | 2.46% |23500 | barryle...@computer.org 2.97% |3 | 2.01% |19205 | joe...@bogus.com 2.97% |3 | 1.75% |16737 | d...@dcrocker.net 1.98% |2 | 2.13% |20377 | i...@jiaziyi.com 1.98% |2 | 2.04% |19449 | frederick.hir...@nokia.com 1.98% |2 | 1.77% |16892 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 1.98% |2 | 1.70% |16245 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.98% |2 | 1.68% |16058 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 2.61% |24941 | vincent.r...@inria.fr 1.98% |2 | 1.54% |14714 | f...@cisco.com 1.98% |2 | 1.50% |14323 | eburge...@standardstrack.com 0.99% |1 | 2.46% |23465 | i...@thomasclausen.org 1.98% |2 | 1.40% |13356 | bob.hin...@gmail.com 1.98% |2 | 1.32% |12620 | wor...@ariadne.com 0.99% |1 | 1.94% |18570 | magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com 0.99% |1 | 1.59% |15178 | nabil.n.bi...@verizon.com 0.99% |1 | 1.53% |14599 | bcla...@cisco.com 0.99% |1 | 1.41% |13508 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.99% |1 | 1.29% |12308 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 1.25% |11951 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.99% |1 | 1.25% |11918 | mdav...@forfun.net 0.99% |1 | 1.02% | 9744 | r...@rfc-editor.org 0.99% |1 | 0.98% | 9351 | aret...@cisco.com 0.99% |1 | 0.90% | 8568 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.99% |1 | 0.88% | 8425 | s...@harvard.edu 0.99% |1 | 0.86% | 8194 | j...@joelhalpern.com 0.99% |1 | 0.85% | 8083 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 0.99% |1 | 0.82% | 7836 | g...@gtwassociates.com 0.99% |1 | 0.73% | 6941 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 0.73% | 6931 | d...@cridland.net 0.99% |1 | 0.71% | 6788 | mstjo...@comcast.net 0.99% |1 | 0.64% | 6114 | y...@checkpoint.com 0.99% |1 | 0.64% | 6112 | do...@dougbarton.us 0.99% |1 | 0.64% | 6099 | sc...@kitterman.com 0.99% |1 | 0.64% | 6079 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 0.99% |1 | 0.62% | 5941 | john-i...@jck.com 0.99% |1 | 0.60% | 5732 | rbar...@bbn.com 0.99% |1 | 0.60% | 5723 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 0.99% |1 | 0.56% | 5346 | ch...@ietf.org 0.99% |1 | 0.55% | 5248 | m...@sap.com 0.99% |1 | 0.52% | 4959 | to...@isi.edu +--++--+ 100.00% | 101 |100.00% | 955020 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 78 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Feb 8 00:53:02 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 10.26% |8 | 9.28% |58558 | s...@resistor.net 6.41% |5 | 7.15% |45081 | barryle...@computer.org 6.41% |5 | 6.86% |43280 | daedu...@btconnect.com 6.41% |5 | 5.23% |33011 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 2.56% |2 | 6.54% |41242 | sprom...@unina.it 3.85% |3 | 4.61% |29101 | d3e...@gmail.com 2.56% |2 | 4.44% |28009 | huawei.da...@huawei.com 2.56% |2 | 4.13% |26062 | luf...@cisco.com 3.85% |3 | 2.75% |17338 | joe...@bogus.com 3.85% |3 | 2.52% |15871 | n...@inex.ie 2.56% |2 | 2.71% |17085 | i...@shaftek.org 2.56% |2 | 2.47% |15590 | john-i...@jck.com 2.56% |2 | 2.33% |14725 | lber...@labn.net 2.56% |2 | 2.23% |14074 | nar...@us.ibm.com 2.56% |2 | 2.22% |14036 | l...@cisco.com 2.56% |2 | 2.17% |13701 | derhoe...@gmx.net 2.56% |2 | 2.16% |13597 | li...@cs.ucla.edu 2.56% |2 | 2.08% |13095 | s...@internet2.edu 2.56% |2 | 2.02% |12744 | hartmans-i...@mit.edu 2.56% |2 | 1.95% |12291 | mcr+i...@sandelman.ca 2.56% |2 | 1.80% |11341 | d...@dcrocker.net 2.56% |2 | 1.63% |10265 | ra...@psg.com 1.28% |1 | 2.71% |17127 | david.bl...@emc.com 1.28% |1 | 2.22% |14000 | ch...@ietf.org 1.28% |1 | 1.73% |10887 | ron.even@gmail.com 1.28% |1 | 1.57% | 9928 | r...@ipv.sx 1.28% |1 | 1.31% | 8254 | frederick.hir...@nokia.com 1.28% |1 | 1.30% | 8187 | hous...@vigilsec.com 1.28% |1 | 1.11% | 7016 | wei...@watson.org 1.28% |1 | 1.09% | 6848 | marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca 1.28% |1 | 1.08% | 6791 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.28% |1 | 1.03% | 6517 | mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com 1.28% |1 | 0.98% | 6156 | paul.hoff...@vpnc.org 1.28% |1 | 0.94% | 5952 | julian.resc...@gmx.de 1.28% |1 | 0.93% | 5885 | do...@dougbarton.us 1.28% |1 | 0.92% | 5814 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 1.28% |1 | 0.91% | 5764 | rbar...@bbn.com 1.28% |1 | 0.89% | 5639 | a...@anvilwalrusden.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 78 |100.00% | 630862 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 55 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Feb 1 00:53:02 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 14.55% |8 | 12.99% |66915 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 5.45% |3 | 10.74% |55297 | b...@google.com 1.82% |1 | 13.45% |69278 | dav...@iit.edu 7.27% |4 | 7.07% |36419 | daedu...@btconnect.com 7.27% |4 | 5.47% |28148 | john-i...@jck.com 7.27% |4 | 5.37% |27683 | s...@resistor.net 7.27% |4 | 4.99% |25680 | d...@dcrocker.net 5.45% |3 | 4.13% |21272 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 5.45% |3 | 3.89% |20035 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 5.45% |3 | 3.59% |18484 | l...@cisco.com 3.64% |2 | 3.23% |16656 | nar...@us.ibm.com 3.64% |2 | 3.21% |16516 | to...@isi.edu 3.64% |2 | 2.59% |13323 | m...@sap.com 3.64% |2 | 2.53% |13011 | barryle...@computer.org 1.82% |1 | 2.94% |15163 | jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com 1.82% |1 | 2.37% |12197 | droma...@avaya.com 1.82% |1 | 2.24% |11534 | l...@pi.nu 1.82% |1 | 1.91% | 9821 | flu...@cisco.com 1.82% |1 | 1.48% | 7624 | spen...@wonderhamster.org 1.82% |1 | 1.45% | 7473 | d3e...@gmail.com 1.82% |1 | 1.26% | 6499 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.82% |1 | 1.14% | 5859 | jo...@taugh.com 1.82% |1 | 0.99% | 5078 | br...@innovationslab.net 1.82% |1 | 0.98% | 5069 | tglas...@earthlink.net +--++--+ 100.00% | 55 |100.00% | 515034 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 97 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 25 00:53:03 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 1.03% |1 | 25.97% | 295206 | bcla...@cisco.com 5.15% |5 | 4.19% |47613 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 2.06% |2 | 6.06% |68919 | rjspa...@nostrum.com 5.15% |5 | 2.77% |31495 | to...@isi.edu 4.12% |4 | 3.39% |38512 | john-i...@jck.com 4.12% |4 | 2.34% |26567 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.12% |4 | 2.31% |26302 | wjordan...@gmail.com 4.12% |4 | 2.22% |25235 | c...@tzi.org 4.12% |4 | 2.14% |24365 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 2.06% |2 | 4.15% |47135 | jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com 3.09% |3 | 2.57% |29240 | nar...@us.ibm.com 3.09% |3 | 1.93% |21972 | jeanj...@comcast.net 3.09% |3 | 1.70% |19320 | joe...@bogus.com 2.06% |2 | 2.68% |30464 | allison.man...@gmail.com 3.09% |3 | 1.46% |16546 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.03% |1 | 2.75% |31261 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 2.06% |2 | 1.66% |18818 | pe...@akayla.com 2.06% |2 | 1.47% |16758 | i...@shaftek.org 2.06% |2 | 1.41% |16079 | daedu...@btconnect.com 2.06% |2 | 1.32% |15055 | fg...@si6networks.com 2.06% |2 | 1.28% |14544 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 2.06% |2 | 1.12% |12674 | d...@xpasc.com 2.06% |2 | 1.11% |12614 | hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net 2.06% |2 | 1.02% |11578 | jo...@taugh.com 2.06% |2 | 0.96% |10862 | d...@dotat.at 1.03% |1 | 1.51% |17218 | mattmat...@google.com 1.03% |1 | 0.96% |10952 | elw...@dial.pipex.com 1.03% |1 | 0.95% |10828 | ron.even@gmail.com 1.03% |1 | 0.92% |10419 | j...@jlc.net 1.03% |1 | 0.88% |10016 | akat...@gmail.com 1.03% |1 | 0.87% | 9939 | hsan...@isdg.net 1.03% |1 | 0.82% | 9346 | jgu...@csc.com 1.03% |1 | 0.81% | 9210 | agma...@gmail.com 1.03% |1 | 0.78% | 8849 | droma...@avaya.com 1.03% |1 | 0.78% | 8814 | cpign...@cisco.com 1.03% |1 | 0.69% | 7891 | l...@netapp.com 1.03% |1 | 0.69% | 7799 | randy_pres...@mindspring.com 1.03% |1 | 0.67% | 7621 | d...@cridland.net 1.03% |1 | 0.66% | 7494 | ch...@ietf.org 1.03% |1 | 0.66% | 7468 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 1.03% |1 | 0.65% | 7440 | petit...@acm.org 1.03% |1 | 0.58% | 6638 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 1.03% |1 | 0.57% | 6424 | s...@cs.columbia.edu 1.03% |1 | 0.56% | 6352 | ferna...@gont.com.ar 1.03% |1 | 0.56% | 6330 | huubatw...@gmail.com 1.03% |1 | 0.55% | 6270 | derhoe...@gmx.net 1.03% |1 | 0.54% | 6122 | cntre...@gmail.com 1.03% |1 | 0.53% | 5993 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.03% |1 | 0.50% | 5641 | war...@kumari.net 1.03% |1 | 0.49% | 5612 | j...@jck.com 1.03% |1 | 0.48% | 5505 | m...@sap.com 1.03% |1 | 0.47% | 5304 | m...@sandelman.ca 1.03% |1 | 0.46% | 5220 | i...@ietf.org 1.03% |1 | 0.41% | 4702 | b...@cafax.se +--++--+ 100.00% | 97 |100.00% | 1136551 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 101 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 18 00:53:02 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 17.82% | 18 | 18.44% | 184336 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie 6.93% |7 | 4.59% |45869 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 4.95% |5 | 6.55% |65472 | st...@stewe.org 5.94% |6 | 4.84% |48342 | petit...@acm.org 3.96% |4 | 6.79% |67832 | nabil.n.bi...@verizon.com 1.98% |2 | 7.49% |74822 | bcla...@cisco.com 4.95% |5 | 4.16% |41564 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 4.95% |5 | 2.95% |29481 | ra...@psg.com 3.96% |4 | 3.03% |30257 | s...@resistor.net 3.96% |4 | 2.74% |27382 | john-i...@jck.com 0.99% |1 | 5.58% |55789 | aldrin.i...@gmail.com 3.96% |4 | 2.59% |25847 | d...@virtualized.org 2.97% |3 | 2.48% |24757 | l...@netapp.com 2.97% |3 | 2.00% |20008 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 2.97% |3 | 1.91% |19120 | m...@sap.com 1.98% |2 | 2.28% |22756 | j...@jlc.net 1.98% |2 | 1.90% |18978 | magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com 1.98% |2 | 1.60% |16022 | o...@ogud.com 1.98% |2 | 1.48% |14769 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 0.99% |1 | 1.69% |16871 | ron.even@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 1.48% |14824 | bernard_ab...@hotmail.com 0.99% |1 | 1.08% |10763 | hsan...@isdg.net 0.99% |1 | 1.07% |10707 | sha...@juniper.net 0.99% |1 | 1.02% |10205 | b...@google.com 0.99% |1 | 0.98% | 9840 | nar...@us.ibm.com 0.99% |1 | 0.88% | 8797 | barryle...@computer.org 0.99% |1 | 0.84% | 8382 | ncamw...@cisco.com 0.99% |1 | 0.82% | 8183 | ebur...@standardstrack.com 0.99% |1 | 0.78% | 7804 | arturo.ser...@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 0.73% | 7331 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.99% |1 | 0.73% | 7328 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 0.71% | 7106 | b...@nostrum.com 0.99% |1 | 0.70% | 7035 | d...@dcrocker.net 0.99% |1 | 0.70% | 6954 | huubatw...@gmail.com 0.99% |1 | 0.66% | 6628 | sm+i...@elandsys.com 0.99% |1 | 0.62% | 6242 | ch...@ietf.org 0.99% |1 | 0.59% | 5863 | l...@asgard.org 0.99% |1 | 0.53% | 5290 | stpe...@stpeter.im +--++--+ 100.00% | 101 |100.00% | 999556 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 166 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 11 00:53:03 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 11.45% | 19 | 7.53% | 127480 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 7.23% | 12 | 7.18% | 121646 | say...@gmail.com 4.22% |7 | 8.90% | 150674 | jasn...@gmail.com 6.02% | 10 | 4.63% |78379 | jeanj...@comcast.net 0.60% |1 | 7.60% | 128690 | nabil.n.bi...@verizon.com 3.01% |5 | 3.17% |53598 | m...@mnot.net 3.01% |5 | 3.06% |51892 | hsan...@isdg.net 3.01% |5 | 2.22% |37592 | dean.wil...@softarmor.com 2.41% |4 | 2.72% |46130 | m...@sap.com 1.81% |3 | 3.04% |51406 | j...@10gen.com 2.41% |4 | 1.71% |29026 | s...@resistor.net 2.41% |4 | 1.38% |23413 | o...@cisco.com 2.41% |4 | 1.35% |22925 | jo...@taugh.com 1.20% |2 | 2.50% |42369 | ted.i...@gmail.com 1.20% |2 | 2.49% |42242 | gregimir...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 2.67% |45175 | neil.2.harri...@bt.com 1.81% |3 | 1.44% |24414 | petit...@acm.org 1.81% |3 | 1.40% |23650 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.81% |3 | 1.37% |23260 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 1.81% |3 | 1.34% |22738 | huubatw...@gmail.com 1.20% |2 | 1.76% |29738 | m...@mpcm.com 1.81% |3 | 1.06% |17893 | glenz...@gmail.com 1.81% |3 | 1.00% |16855 | wor...@ariadne.com 0.60% |1 | 2.16% |36597 | b...@google.com 1.81% |3 | 0.93% |15686 | swm...@swm.pp.se 0.60% |1 | 1.99% |33745 | gregory.mir...@ericsson.com 1.20% |2 | 1.11% |18750 | eng.mahmoude...@yahoo.com 1.20% |2 | 1.10% |18668 | l...@cisco.com 1.20% |2 | 0.96% |16314 | pbr...@anode.ca 1.20% |2 | 0.88% |14906 | john-i...@jck.com 1.20% |2 | 0.80% |13623 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 1.20% |2 | 0.77% |13020 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.20% |2 | 0.76% |12869 | s...@internet2.edu 1.20% |2 | 0.70% |11872 | rwfra...@acm.org 1.20% |2 | 0.68% |11451 | y...@checkpoint.com 1.20% |2 | 0.66% |11250 | rbar...@bbn.com 1.20% |2 | 0.65% |11078 | m...@sandelman.ca 1.20% |2 | 0.64% |10769 | ra...@psg.com 0.60% |1 | 0.85% |14372 | superu...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.74% |12562 | l...@pi.nu 0.60% |1 | 0.70% |11785 | alh-i...@tndh.net 0.60% |1 | 0.66% |11201 | thegreat...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.62% |10452 | presn...@qti.qualcomm.com 0.60% |1 | 0.58% | 9838 | conal.tu...@versi.edu.au 0.60% |1 | 0.57% | 9572 | daedu...@btconnect.com 0.60% |1 | 0.53% | 8965 | p...@frobbit.se 0.60% |1 | 0.51% | 8609 | c...@tzi.org 0.60% |1 | 0.48% | 8127 | d3e...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.47% | 7950 | sha...@juniper.net 0.60% |1 | 0.45% | 7590 | markus.lantha...@gmx.net 0.60% |1 | 0.44% | 7525 | tglas...@earthlink.net 0.60% |1 | 0.44% | 7519 | d...@cridland.net 0.60% |1 | 0.44% | 7418 | j...@juniper.net 0.60% |1 | 0.43% | 7324 | b...@nostrum.com 0.60% |1 | 0.42% | 7099 | melinda.sh...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.42% | 7041 | adr...@olddog.co.uk 0.60% |1 | 0.41% | 7007 | to...@isi.edu 0.60% |1 | 0.41% | 6861 | lber...@labn.net 0.60% |1 | 0.37% | 6335 | bcla...@cisco.com 0.60% |1 | 0.37% | 6287 | uyesh...@ifa.hawaii.edu 0.60% |1 | 0.37% | 6267 | bra...@isi.edu 0.60% |1 | 0.37% | 6234 | rdroms.i...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.34% | 5829 | framefri...@gmail.com 0.60% |1 | 0.34% | 5756 | ch...@ietf.org 0.60% |1 | 0.33% | 5623 | k...@bbn.com 0.60% |1 | 0.31% | 5222 | stpe...@stpeter.im 0.60% |1 | 0.30% | 5117 | he...@pobox.com +--++--+ 100.00% | 166 |100.00% | 1693270 | Total
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Total of 92 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 4 00:53:06 EST 2013 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 8.70% |8 | 14.15% | 126350 | hal...@gmail.com 8.70% |8 | 13.78% | 123045 | jeanj...@comcast.net 7.61% |7 | 4.67% |41668 | d...@dcrocker.net 7.61% |7 | 4.20% |37492 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 5.43% |5 | 4.45% |39710 | chris.dearl...@baesystems.com 1.09% |1 | 6.54% |58445 | nabil.n.bi...@verizon.com 4.35% |4 | 2.99% |26738 | john-i...@jck.com 2.17% |2 | 3.84% |34288 | ndonn...@isoc-cameroon.org 3.26% |3 | 2.52% |22490 | daedu...@btconnect.com 3.26% |3 | 2.51% |22394 | carlosm3...@gmail.com 3.26% |3 | 2.30% |20536 | s...@resistor.net 2.17% |2 | 2.93% |26167 | jgu...@csc.com 1.09% |1 | 3.36% |29966 | jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com 2.17% |2 | 1.94% |17347 | brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com 2.17% |2 | 1.84% |16456 | p...@frobbit.se 2.17% |2 | 1.76% |15760 | f...@cisco.com 2.17% |2 | 1.50% |13398 | ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com 2.17% |2 | 1.48% |13218 | st...@shinkuro.com 2.17% |2 | 1.13% |10083 | ra...@psg.com 2.17% |2 | 1.09% | 9759 | j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu 1.09% |1 | 2.15% |19202 | jmamo...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.89% |16888 | dvb...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 1.34% |11969 | alh-i...@tndh.net 1.09% |1 | 1.08% | 9668 | rbon...@juniper.net 1.09% |1 | 1.06% | 9454 | j...@nlnetlabs.nl 1.09% |1 | 0.96% | 8605 | p...@redbarn.org 1.09% |1 | 0.90% | 8008 | kwier...@cisco.com 1.09% |1 | 0.85% | 7587 | war...@kumari.net 1.09% |1 | 0.79% | 7029 | stbry...@cisco.com 1.09% |1 | 0.78% | 6983 | nar...@us.ibm.com 1.09% |1 | 0.77% | 6839 | ves...@tana.it 1.09% |1 | 0.74% | 6601 | ch...@ietf.org 1.09% |1 | 0.68% | 6031 | d3e...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 0.67% | 6019 | wor...@alum.mit.edu 1.09% |1 | 0.67% | 6009 | b...@nostrum.com 1.09% |1 | 0.66% | 5916 | wor...@ariadne.com 1.09% |1 | 0.65% | 5790 | abdussalambar...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 0.65% | 5786 | jo...@taugh.com 1.09% |1 | 0.65% | 5772 | li...@cs.ucla.edu 1.09% |1 | 0.64% | 5718 | jason_living...@cable.comcast.com 1.09% |1 | 0.63% | 5652 | gjs...@gmail.com 1.09% |1 | 0.62% | 5565 | d...@xpasc.com 1.09% |1 | 0.61% | 5469 | s...@cs.columbia.edu 1.09% |1 | 0.59% | 5240 | m...@sandelman.ca +--++--+ 100.00% | 92 |100.00% | 893110 | Total
