[ilugd] BSNL EVDO dongle on Fedora 14
Hi, I am trying to help somebody get a BSNL EVDO card running on Fedora 14. From lsusb, I get that device is (15eb:1231) . Problem is that Fedora 14 sees it just as a storage device and is not detected as a modem. I had a similar problem with my reliance card but usb_modeswitch solved that. However, configuring usb_modeswitch.conf in this case does not help. When usb_modeswitch is run, it ends up giving the error : 'response endpoint not given or found' . Any help to get this working would be much appreciated. Thanks Gurteshwar ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Large Debian installations in India
Message: 3 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:40:05 +0530 From: Raj Mathur r...@linux-delhi.org To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org Subject: [ilugd] Large Debian installations in India Message-ID: AANLkTineGc-BUVqQ=o0y0x_pjnmfsqz+vhzkv9dze...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Tirveni and I just completed a large (~2500 desktops + ~40 servers) installation of Debian -- Squeeze and Wheezy -- in 6 locations in India. Was wondering, is anyone aware of larger or comparable Debian installations in the country? Or should we be spraining our wrists trying to pat ourselves on our backs? Regards, -- Raj Hi, First, congratulations on the large scale deployment ! May I also add a few related questions. Feel free to ignore any if they fall in the NDA domain :) 1) Regarding support and access: Setting up telephony systems is not such an easy job and messing them up seems to be even easier. So my question is how much of access do you give the organisation's in-house support team on your servers. Do you for example take the risk of asterisk config files getting messed by somebody at your client's location? Or do you only expose only the dynamic parts of the system (adding users, retrieving call recordings etc). I imagine it would be mandatory to give them root access. Is that correct? If yes, then is it the case of implementing as many safeguards as you can? 2) Licensing: How do you go about explaining them the license. Do you just list major parts like asterisk and debian and tell them we used this and its licensed under so and so foss license? Is there detailed written license documentation to be provided or just providing links to licenses sufficient? Regards, Gurteshwar ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Request for suggestion for setting up Asterisk based call-center
Hi, Basically what is illegal to do in terms of VoIP is to say have a PSTN/ISDN line plugged into your voip server and then lease that out to somebody over IP. In effect selling it as a DID number over IP. Most other cases are perfectly legal. There's tons of EPABX systems being sold from vendors like Simens, NEC, etc for years. You plug in an outside line, which could be PSTN or ISDN and distribute calls to your extensions (either through IP or TDM). For IP, these systems (Siemens for eg) come with some sort of a LAN card, which lets you plugin that massive EPABX box on to your LAN switch and route all incoming traffic to your softswitch (Asterisk for eg) and then distribute calls to extensions which maybe IP phones or softphones. You can go for official permission to integrate VOIP with the normal DOT lines/exchanges. Authorities charge heavily for it, but it is possible. There is NO offical permission required. You apply to a provider, who will take some documents from you and do whatever is required in terms of dealing with authorities like TRAI for whatever obligations there maybe. There is NO special license required and certainly NO extra fees. You just pay your provider, the same way you pay for your internet connection. Disclaimer: I'm no legal expert but I just got a PRI line from Airtel, so I've been through the 'process'. From what I'm aware, the primary concept behind the law is preventing toll bypass, which I don't think is happening in Niyaz's case as he mentioned the calls are incoming calls. Even if it was outgoing, it was happening via the PRI, so there also no toll bypass is happening. I don't recall which document it was, but I interpreted it as PBX being allowed, and if the company has multiple locations in India, then PBX over VPN was also permitted. My assessment too is exactly this. I've always found VOIP in India be a gray area, and have never been able to figure out what's legal and what's not. Would be glad if you've some conclusive documents/links. The best I could find was a document on TRAI's website, which was also pretty dated and worded in an almost self-conflicting manner. There really should be more official clarity on this. Regards Gurteshwar ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Request for suggestion for setting up Asterisk based call-center
--- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:08:20 +0530 From: Raj Mathur ( ??? =?utf-8?b?IOCkruCkvuCkpeClgeCksA==?=) r...@linux-delhi.org Of course, the law itself exists purely to protect the erstwhile VSNL and similar organisations from unfair competition from the Internet. Unfair to whom, I wonder? VoIP is certainly fair to the population of India, who are currently needlessly being denied access to new paradigms of communication purely to protect some vested interests. Quite the norm, don't you think? OK, enough ranting, back to Asterisk hacking ;-) I'm a freeswitcher ;-) Message: 3 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:18:10 +0530 From: Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com Great, and very illuminating discussion thread, I must say. Maybe, it is time for an Asterix meetup :-) Count me in. Also there's this event called Convergence India happening from 24th to 26th. I was contemplating whether to attend, maybe just to pick up some first hand information if nothing more. Has anybody attended such a conference? Seems worthwhile. Regards Gurteshwar ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] CentOS intel 82574L gigE NIC problem
Hi, I have a very weird problem which I'm unable to diagnose after trying various things. So this maybe long, please bear with me. I bought a new IBM x3250 server. It has two gigE ports. lspci :- 0b:00.0 Ethernet Controller : Intel Corp 82574L Gigabit Network Connection 15:00.0 Ethernet Controller : Intel Corp 82574L Gigabit Network Connection lspci -n |grep 0b:00.0 :- 0b:00.0 0200: 8086:10d3 (same for the other one) uname -r :- 2.6.18-194.el5 I installed CentOS 5.5 and configured the interface for dhcp. It fails to connect and just keeps fluctuating. In /var/log/messages/ I see Link is up/down message repeatedly (every second). I can give it a static ip and define a static route, but it does absolutely nothing except self-ping. First I thought it was a driver issue, so I updated to the latest driver for my card (e1000e) first from elrepo.org (didn't work) then from the intel website (didn't work). elrepo btw is not up to date with intel. I called the IBM guys who showed up today with a Windows Server CD today, installed it- same problem there. They called for a new motherboard, put windows 2003 server edition, same problem! They updated the BIOS 3 times.. same problem on all 3. They went back without a solution, collecting the DSA logs (it's an ibm thing i think). They haven't closed the call and are still on it. I then got a new, exact same machine from the vendor, I ran a live cd first (linux mint) and I get a STABLE link, booted windows from the previous installation (hot-swap drives) STABLE link. IBM guys go home, I install CentOS and poof! back to square one! :( Then I tried linux mint, same issue. You can rule out faulty cables or switch ports, I've verified that. Ok, this is really weird, I just found a workaround. By just I mean after I'd typed all of the above email. Just for kicks I put in a dumb 10/100 mbps hub in the path and it works great :) This however, is temporary. Could this be a link negotiation issue? Also, what baffles me is that this problem persisted across 3 motherboards and 2 machines only after CentOS was brought into the picture. CentOS first, followed by other distros. Failed for every one of them. Other OS first (including windows) STABLE link, bring CentOS into the picture, it failed and also for every subsequent OS. I read somewhere that there was a time when the e1000e driver in the kernel was bricking NICs but somebody also told me that code didn't make it into CentOS. Anybody ever come across such a thing? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks Gurteshwar ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] CentOS intel 82574L gigE NIC problem
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:23 AM, gurteshwar singh gurteshwarsi...@gmail.com wrote: snip You can rule out faulty cables or switch ports, I've verified that. My bad, the faithful wndr3700 is now toast! Just by co-incidence it was perfectly in time with the new machine's arrival. The ports were screwing up intermittently, and not on any other machine in the LAN. Until today. I've replaced that and everything's good. Thanks Gurteshwar ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] [Commercial] Looking for a web designer.
Hi, I am looking for somebody to build me a website for a consulting company. Nothing really fancy is required. I have bought the domain names. You will also be responsible for maintaining, updating and all sort of housekeeping. We could work on an yearly subscription type deal, where I pay you X and outsource everything to do with the site to you. It would be a big plus, if you have some sort of portfolio of current clients that I could have a look at. Those interested, please contact me off the list. P.S. Just so you know, the company's a start-up. Thanks Gurteshwar ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Which L2 Switch should I buy?
Hi, I need recommendations for a L2 switch that is capable of 802.3af PoE. I had shortlisted D-Link's DES-1228P but I just read some reviews on forums.dlink.com (glad I did!). It seems like a lot of people have had to get theirs replaced. Please suggest some switches that you are using in production and have good things to say about. My budget is around 30-35k. Thanks gs ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] 24 port Pre-standard PoE switch
Hi, Basically, the Cisco 7940G VoIP phones don't work with the IEEE standard 802.3af PoE. They require Cisco prestandard PoE. Since I don't have the option of getting other phones. Please suggest what (however limited!) options do I have for the switch. thanks ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Linksys Spa3102 regional settings.
Hi, So I did manage getting hold of a spa3102. I've been trying to set it up with FreeSwitch and integrate my PSTN line. After repeated attempts I was getting nowhere when I finally looked at regional settings. I've tried various configs and am now reasonably sure that its an issue with regional settings. I reset the spa3102 to default settings, and plugged in the PSTN phone line into fxo and an analong phone into fxs. There is no network cable connected and no sort of PBX involved. When I call my PSTN number, the phone at fxs does ring but a call is not being established. If I answer the phone, there is no call established and it disconnects in 2 sec. and I get a disconn tone, while the caller continues to hear the PSTN number ring. Same thing if the call goes unanswered. The PSTN line status on the spa3102 shows Last Call Disconn. reason: CPC Signal. I think I am correct in assuming that there is no point in any further configuration attempts until I manage to get this call established first. Should this plug and play setup be working by default on every spa3102 if regional settings are correct? If that is the case then it mostly seems like an issue with regional settings. I looked at the voxilla forums and other places and tried whatever regional tone settings I could find for India. Nothing has worked so far. When I bring in the PBX into the picture, I have no problem with my phone working as an sip extension doing everything that is configured just as any other softphone would do. The problem is with PSTN and I suspect its regional settings. Where can I find the correct settings? If anybody has this device configured, please drop me a line. Thanks ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Re: [ilugd] Where can I buy a Linksys SPA3102 VoIP Adapter?
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: *cough* is this stuff legal in India now ? *cough* - KB wow! This is new to me. I read somewhere that terminating PSTN traffic at a PBX and integrating with VoIP extensions among a closed user group(CUG) is legal. I'm not sure about this either. Where can I find more details about the legal hurdles? Thanks ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] Where can I buy a Linksys SPA3102 VoIP Adapter?
Hi, I am looking for a Linksys SPA3102 adapter. I called a few places in Nehru Place, only one said he could procure it in a week. All of them seem to have the Linksys PAP2T adapter readily available. If you know some place I might find it, please send me a contact number. Also if anybody's using anything else that has min. 1 FXS + 1 FXO + 1 WAN port with Freeswitch, please email me. Thanks ___ Ilugd mailing list Ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
[ilugd] [OT] The Pirate Party wins.
The Pirate Party won a seat in the European Parliament. http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-party-wins-and-enters-the-european-parliament-090607/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] PirateBay hilarity..
First the trial judge was accused of bias, now the judge who was appointed to review whether the earlier judge was biased has also been removed for being biased. This drama just keeps getting better and better. :-) http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/judge-reviewing-pirate-bay-trial-bias-is-removed-for-bias/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] FOSS and Indian Political Party Websites
india is indeed a young nation, with approximately 54% of its population under the age of 35 years, and that's a lot of folks for a 1 billion population. what amazes me, is how come no one has yet seriously considered a 'Pirate Party of India'. the one in sweden is the fourth-largest in its country already, and similar ones exist across Europe. take a look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_Party Fourth largest and this time they may also get a seat in the EU parliament. link: http://in.reuters.com/articlePrint?articleId=INIndia-39428420090505 i am reasonably certain such a party would soon emerge in india, more sensitive (hopefully) to our cultural values towards knowledge and sharing across software, authored literature, medicine, education, agriculture, genetics, and more. While such parties do exist elsewhere, India would certainly benefit the most by something like this emerging here. who knows, we might just see some of our young folks from ilug-d moving on to form such a party eventually. i can think of several dozen candidates from the foss community! I am optimistic as well! regards, guru ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] drivers for broadcom bcm4312 802.11b/g(rev 01) on centOS
Also, you could try using the drivers from this Feisty HowTo for ndiswrapper. They've sourced them from the Compaq website(step 2b for. bcm4312 revision 01) and used cabextract. Or you could use the ZIP file here - http://uploading.com/files/VXHOYZLY/bcm4312rev01.zip.html Hi, I followed the HowTo, step 2e worked for me, since my chipset pci id was different from the one in 2b. Now that I have wlan0 up, I don't think it will work in raw monitor mode since the driver is installed via ndiswrapper. Which brings me to my next question. Does anybody know of a usb-dongle that will work in monitor mode. I do not have pcmcia card slot and the dell people tell me that no other wifi card will be supported by my notebook's motherboard. So I cant shift to the intel interfaces. The usb-dongle being my only option (i think). I am looking at Airlink101 AWLL3026. From what I read, it really works well, including injection. Please advice me of what usb option I should go for. And if you know any reseller in Delhi, do let me know Thanks. Regards, guru ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] drivers for broadcom bcm4312 802.11b/g(rev 01) on centOS
Hi, I am trying to configure wireless on my Dell inspiron 15 notebook using centOS. This may seem like a repost. I had asked this question about a month back but then i went home and had no wireless available so wasn't able to try any of the suggestions. As suggested by Raj and Karanbir I downloaded the driver for xp from the dell website and tried to install it using ndiswrapper. I unzipped the .exe and installed netathw.inf. ndiswrapper -l tells me invalid driver! I expected this since the dell website states that the xp driver applies to only the Wireless 1515 (11agn) WLAN half mini-card (Atheros). I have a Dell Wireless 1397 802.11b/g Half Mini Card. The driver for Vista seems to support this card. The problem now is that I am unable to extract the .inf (or anything else) from .exe provided for vista. I tried unzip, cabextract and even wine, but all failed. Any help would be appreciated. Regards, guru ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Pirate Bay judge hilarity
For anyone following the case, it's gone way beyond farce. It's the icing on the cake. BTW, the Pirate Party is now the 4th biggest political party in Sweden. Compared to the 2000 members they had 3 yrs back when they first got raided. Oh, we live in interesting times alright! Interesting times indeed! ;-) ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] This is weird!
Hi, I received an email from crmarket...@airtel.in, I use airtel broadband but this is the first time they sent such a mail. The mail had an image attached which looks like a snapshot of some webpage. The weird part is the text of the mail, it's some sort of Non-disclosure Agreement which I'm supposed to automatically bind to as I open the mail, that's totally absurd. I spoke to Airtel CC and at first one person verified the mail but seemed quite unsure to me. He said it was only sent to 'special' customers which makes me wonder why I am a 'special' customer. After two more calls to CC, I was told to forward the mail to care@airtel.in. They said that they would call me back in an hour. I am still waiting for that. The content of the mail is as follows: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure,dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The recipient acknowledges that Bharti Airtel Limited or its subsidiaries and associated companies(collectively Bharti Airtel Limited),are unable to exercise control or ensure or guarantee the integrity of/overthe contents of the information contained in e-mail transmissions and further acknowledges that any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and no binding nature of the message shall be implied or assumed unless the sender does so expressly with due authority of Bharti Airtel Limited. Before opening any attachments please check them for viruses and defects. ... It looks more like a phishing attack. Sane advice would be not to open the attachment but my curiosity got the better of me and I had to check what this weird mail was. Since I have not received a good enough response from Airtel for a week now, paranoia is setting in :-) Anybody else received such a mail? P.S.: Apologies if this looks like a long rant, but its really confused me and googling around didn't help as I couldn't find anybody else facing this issue. Regards, guru ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] Wireless on Dell Inspiron 15 (CentOS 5.2)
Hi, I am trying to configure wireless on a Dell Inspiron 15 notebook. I am using CentOS 5.2. The output of lspci tells me that my wireless card is 0c:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4310 USB Controller (rev 01). The only way to get this up seems using ndiswrapper. Is there any other way? Also I am pretty sure that even if I get it working, my wireless card will not support raw monitoring (rfmon) mode. Please suggest any addon wireless cards (usb/other) which will run in rfmon and will be supported(not necessarily out of the box) by CentOS 5.2 and be easily available in the market, the cheaper the better :-) Also is there any other way of getting my present wifi card to work without using ndiswrapper? Thanks guru ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Wireless on Dell Inspiron 15 (CentOS 5.2)
Yes.Enable rpmfusion-nonfree repository in your system. (visit www.rpmfusion.org) then install broadcom-wl package, yum install broadcom-wl I did that, it says No package broadcom-wl available. Regards, guru ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] FOSS Manifesto for Indian political parties
This is really cool. Maybe OT, but this makes me ask something I have been wondering about for sometime: what if I need to look up some such Indian census data online? Where can I look? (take a look at http://www.censusindia.net/, for example, the link for 2001 Census returns a 404). Or, what if I need to lookup some (central or state) law document online? The few law sites that Google returns want you to pay them to view the documents. Is there some useful resource (nic.in?) that I am missing? If not, is there any work being done in this direction? Chaitanya As far as I know, the way things work here is that you can request for information to be made public http://rti.gov.in/ But to make info readily available online without having to go through a requesting protocol has never been a goal of the govt. If it is, I maybe unaware. Somebody please point me to relevant links guru ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] FOSS Manifesto for Indian political parties
Great work! The obama campaign for change has made a lot of noise in India as well and has supposedly inspired or motivated people here. Here's what they're doing with open source. http://howto.wired.com/wiki/Open_Up_Government_Data ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] blog post about freed.in day 2 (shirish)
From: shirish shirisha...@gmail.com Subject: [ilugd] blog post about freed.in day 2 Hi all, Day 2 now online (sans photos) apologize for the same. http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/freed-day-2/ -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal Hi all, Dear Shirish, I read your posts about freed.in day-2. A few things I wish to point out regarding your take on my talk. From your post http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/freed-day-2/ The real story which he forgot was that the year after, ERNET was up and shell accounts were starting to give people which dried up the business of BBS overtime. Not something I forgot but was actually aware of. It would've made sense to include, if I was giving an elaborate account of the business history of BBS overtime. My whole point was how people got together on the boards(i cant call it the internet :-)) for speaking against something they didn't like or thought was unfair and how it actually resulted in action on ground. My not including or as you say forgetting what happened to the BBS business after that does not dispute my claim in any way. Also, I thought it to be irrelevant to the given context. His 2 second plug www.indiasopinion.com as his take on where this can be taken forward. This is completely misunderstood. Maybe I did not do well enough to get my point across clearly to you. If you asked Kishore, I think he would recall that after the first volunteer meet, I had quite a detailed discussion with him regarding my talk. I even asked him if I should completely remove any mention of my 2 second plug as the idea was to bring forward the research that showed how the information we seek online is directly proportional to the opinions we form and communicate. And how these two also happen to be the primary activities of all users. My effort was to pitch these ideas and research to an audience with way more advanced technical skills than mine, so that they could try and decide how it can be taken forward. Sadly, as of now my skills are limited to system/network administration. I am not(yet) a developer. The only little contributions I could make were via Wordpress, which I had been checking out for some time. Hence, my 2 second plug which I think is by no means conclusive. A lot can and I think needs to be done to take this forward. My take, watch out for wordpress+buddypress, that should be a killer thing to look at ;) Great. Thanks for letting me know of this. Looks very good. Perhaps if it could be integrated via a facebook app, the problem of first establishing a large user base would diminish. Regards, guru ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
