Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 10-6

2010-10-07 Thread Nick Hall-Patch
Were you getting echoes on 756 at all Gary?Seemed that was what I 
was getting here this morning, strange sounding but rather weak.


best wishes,

Nick


At 02:53 07/10/2010, you wrote:

Hello All,

 Asiatic propagation was improved from most areas  this morning,
especially from China and Korea. There were interesting TP  mixes on 
both 639 and

756 kHz as the CNR1 stations had persistent  co-channels



___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] WGBW-1590 Two Rivers, WI DX Test announced

2010-10-07 Thread Brandon Jordan
Per communication from OJ Saghdal in Norway, WGBW-1590 in Two Rivers, WI 
will be running a DX Test on Oct. 16, 2010 at 0500-0600 UT. Full details 
posted at:


http://www.dxtests.info

Please be sure to notify us at dxtests.info [at] gmail.com regarding 
information on any DX Tests or other special broadcast events.


73,
Brandon
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] Demise of KHBC

2010-10-07 Thread Patrick Martin
vvIn the event that  you haven*t heard yet, KHBC 92.7FM (Hilo), KHBC
1060AM (Hilo) and Kona 92.1FM are dark.  This occurred yesterday
morning.  All 3 stations have been shut down due to lack of funds and
a large amount of money owed to various entities (i.e. Aloha Radio
Group, Marquee Broadcasting, Korbel Capital LLC, Spring Ranch,  IRS
and HI State Dept of Taxation.  Scott Parker said he hoped it would be
a temporary closure.  A rumor going around (according to the HI
Tribune Herald) is an imminent sale to New West Broadcasting which
includes KWXX-FM, KNWB-FM and KPUA-AM.  Chris Leonard Pres/GM said he
had talked with Parker but due to economy that the local marketing
agreement was not with us. 
  
Parker said all employees were paid and he hoped to reopen with a new
plan and perhaps a new formet in the next few months.   Parrott
Broadcasting (Parker) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization in
January.

73,

Patrick Martin
Seaside OR 
KGED QSL Manager


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] 936 Iran!

2010-10-07 Thread neilkaz
In case anyone has any doubts why I advised you to use that row of trees for a 
flag-type antenna, they can look at your recent TA logs, esp. this one and see 
that things for you are even better than I expected. 73 KAZ needing to work 936 
himself now that Montreal is gone.


-Original Message-
From: Jim Renfrew jrenf...@rochester.rr.com
Sent: Oct 6, 2010 7:53 PM
To: a...@nrcdxas.org, a...@wtfda.info, Mailing list for the International 
Radio Club of America irca@hard-core-dx.com
Subject: [IRCA] 936 Iran!

Jim Renfrew, Holley NY

Thanks to Keith McGinnis' tip, I have been sitting on 936 for the last few 
minutes, and at 0048z (2048 edt) the odd choral music I am hearing (almost 
like a Gregorian chant) is distinctly parallel to the IRIB Delicast audio 
stream!  Awesome, country #72 (or #71 if I don't count East Germany, heard 
since it stopped existing!) 

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread bill kral
I wonder if anyone east of Vancouver hearing Mt.Angel has noticed that the Mex 
music suddenly disappears a few minutes before LSS ever y afternoon with 
regular daily repetition.The high pressure system causing the strange skio 
phenomenon will be replaced by a low pressure system which will also cause this 
strange Spanish sounding signal, on Friday and into the weekend So how will it 
affect reception of CKWX east of Van when it's raining? We'll see what happens 
then Bill in BC


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Patrick Martin
Bill,

With 50KW ERP to the North, the Mount Angel QRM is not going away.
Infact, as it gets towards Winter, the QRM will last longer in the
morning and start earlier in the afternoon. The only way the QRM will go
away if Mt. Angel drops power, changes their directional pattern, or
goes off the air. If they get the 50 KW days, they are asking for,
the QRM wil even be worse.  Why in the World did the FCC ever allow this
station to come on, is beyond me, as CKWX should be protected as they
have been on 1130 for decades. CKWX needs to really raise the roof on
this to the FCC.

73,

Patrick 

Patrick Martin
Seaside OR 
KGED QSL Manager

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] WGBW AM -1590, Two Rivers, WI PLANNED TEST OCT. 16th at MIDNIGHT CENTRAL

2010-10-07 Thread John Rieger
All,
   Here's a part of the letter from Mr.Heller...

It's a Saturday morning.
12am to 1am 
I know there's ocnfusion because it's not a Sunday morning... but we
didn't want to ruin our entire weekend!



we're moving to Denmark, WI next year with 10kw days. there are no
1590's between us and the North Pole, so that will be an interesting
experiment when the array goes up!


  Mark is a radio guy. He gets it and you can bet the test will run!
  73!
  John

  Thanx to all who spread the word on this.


John J. Rieger, South Milwaukee,WI 

http://DX-midAMerica.com 

24/7 NSP! We never close!


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] WGBW AM -1590, Two Rivers, WI PLANNED TEST OCT. 16th at MIDNIGHT CENTRAL

2010-10-07 Thread Paul B. Walker, Jr.
Mark Heller is definately a radio guy... he is the owner of WGBW and he's
also an engineer.. a very intelligent engineer.

Paul Walker



On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:34 AM, John Rieger dx-midamer...@webtv.netwrote:

 All,
   Here's a part of the letter from Mr.Heller...

 It's a Saturday morning.
 12am to 1am
 I know there's ocnfusion because it's not a Sunday morning... but we
 didn't want to ruin our entire weekend!



 we're moving to Denmark, WI next year with 10kw days. there are no
 1590's between us and the North Pole, so that will be an interesting
 experiment when the array goes up!


  Mark is a radio guy. He gets it and you can bet the test will run!
  73!
  John

  Thanx to all who spread the word on this.


 John J. Rieger, South Milwaukee,WI

 http://DX-midAMerica.com http://dx-midamerica.com/

 24/7 NSP! We never close!


 ___
 IRCA mailing list
 IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
 original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
 IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

 To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] WGBW AM -1590, Two Rivers, WI PLANNED TEST OCT. 16th at MIDNIGHT CENTRAL

2010-10-07 Thread HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS
Thanks John and Paul;

Too bad that there are not more radio guys, in radio.  Sad but true -
there isn't a lot of folks like Mr. Heller.  Please John, pass along my
thanks.  Hopefully the 10 Kw will run a test, too.

Dave in Indy

-Original Message-
From: Paul B. Walker, Jr. [mailto:walkerbroadcast...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 7:24 AM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Cc: HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS; a...@lists.wtfda.info
Subject: Re: [IRCA] WGBW AM -1590, Two Rivers, WI PLANNED TEST OCT. 16th
at MIDNIGHT CENTRAL

Mark Heller is definately a radio guy... he is the owner of WGBW and
he's also an engineer.. a very intelligent engineer.
 
Paul Walker


 
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:34 AM, John Rieger dx-midamer...@webtv.net
wrote:


All,
  Here's a part of the letter from Mr.Heller...

It's a Saturday morning.
12am to 1am
I know there's ocnfusion because it's not a Sunday morning...
but we
didn't want to ruin our entire weekend!



we're moving to Denmark, WI next year with 10kw days. there
are no
1590's between us and the North Pole, so that will be an
interesting
experiment when the array goes up!


 Mark is a radio guy. He gets it and you can bet the test will
run!
 73!
 John

 Thanx to all who spread the word on this.


John J. Rieger, South Milwaukee,WI

http://DX-midAMerica.com http://dx-midamerica.com/ 

24/7 NSP! We never close!



___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of
the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
http://www.ircaonline.org/ 

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com





___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] more about 1130 interference

2010-10-07 Thread HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS
To be perfectly honest, it could be a chance for a DX'er (who has the
time (who has the time? Not me, LOL)) to explain DX'ing and propagation
to CKWX.  It could be an olive branch to the station from DX'ers, to set
them straight and get a plug for MW DX'ing.  Maybe a DX Test? :)

Any volunteers?  Still the weather related angle is too funny.  I bet
they go right back to it, later on this month with the SR times.

73,
Dave in Indy

--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:26:53 -0700
From: Bruce Portzer bport...@comcast.net
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
irca@hard-core-dx.com
Subject: Re: [IRCA] more about 1130 interference
Message-ID: 4cad3dfd.5050...@comcast.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

  This is what's known as a snow job.  Vancouver could have used some of

that stuff during the Winter Olympics :)

Let's see what they say after the high pressure ridge is gone.

Bruce


On 10/6/2010 10:21 AM, Eric Floden wrote:
 from CKWX site



http://www.news1130.com/news/local/article/111376--say-goodbye-to-notici
as1130
   Say goodbye to Noticias1130. Spanish radio should stop bleeding
through
 airwaves soon
 Mike Lloyd Oct 06, 2010 07:36:25 AM

   VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) - Many of our listeners from the Fraser Valley
to the
 Tri-Cities have been hearing a Spanish language station broadcasting
on
 News1130. The signal that has been bleeding through our airwaves is
coming
 from Mt Angel, Oregon.

 After a meeting between our engineers and those from the American
station,
 here's the real deal: It's not just simple signal skipping or a strong
 signal drowning out News1130. We're told it's a rare atmospheric
anomaly,
 stronger than it's been in years. A few things have converged to
create
 conditions not seen in decades, some of which are weather-related.

 News1130 Meteorologist Russ Lacate has been talking about an enormous
 high-pressure ridge for some time now. It's been influencing the
coastal
 weather from Prince Rupert to L.A. and what's really happening is the
 uppermost layer of the atmosphere is becoming very stable, very
stratified.
 [That's] creating a channel between the layers of the atmosphere
through
 which radio waves can travel unobstructed.

 Lacate says in rare conditions like these, radio waves can travel
across
 abnormally long distances. It is called a skywave and it seems to
peak
 between 7am-9am and 6pm-8pm.

 The good news is it's expected to return to normal soon. So, adios la
 Mexicana, hola News1130! And muchas gracias to all our listeners for
being
 patient.

**

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Saul DX
I sent them an e-mail yesterday, explaining all this, and have yet to hear 
back...


Saul


- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Martin mwd...@webtv.net
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club ofAmerica 
irca@hard-core-dx.com

Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference



Bill,

With 50KW ERP to the North, the Mount Angel QRM is not going away.
Infact, as it gets towards Winter, the QRM will last longer in the
morning and start earlier in the afternoon. The only way the QRM will go
away if Mt. Angel drops power, changes their directional pattern, or
goes off the air. If they get the 50 KW days, they are asking for,
the QRM wil even be worse.  Why in the World did the FCC ever allow this
station to come on, is beyond me, as CKWX should be protected as they
have been on 1130 for decades. CKWX needs to really raise the roof on
this to the FCC.

73,

Patrick

Patrick Martin
Seaside OR
KGED QSL Manager

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers


For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com




___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] TP's for 10/07/10

2010-10-07 Thread vroomski



Listened from 1343-1426 utc.  Started latter than usually, again lower channels 
much
better than higher channels.  All Japan  Korea's this morning.

279  RUSSIA, Radio Rossii 1346 good with man in Russian.
567  JAPAN, JOIK NHK1 1347-1348 weak to fair and // 594.
576  RUSSIA,? 1352-1400 fair twice during this period.  not // to NHK1 on 
594.
 Gone at 1400. 
594  JAPAN, JOAK NHK1 1350 good with woman/man in Japanese.
603  REPUBLIC OF KOREA, HLSA 1401 weak with talk and music.
639  CHINA, CRN1? 1402-1405 guessing on this one, started with brief music, 
faded, then
back with talk. Tried to match NHK1 //, but no luck. Gone at 
1406
657  DPR OF KOREA, 1408 weak distorted signal, matched // 3250.
693  JAPAN, JOAB 1419 fair with mild splatter, woman is Japanese and // 774.
666  JAPAN, JOBK NHK1 1409-1410 fair with man in Japanese and // 594.
774  JAPAN, JOUB NHK2 1343-1345 good at times with Business English program.
828  JAPAN, JOBB NHK2 1417 fair at best, nothing like big brother on 774.
873  JAPAN, JOGB NHK2 1418 very weak.
891  UNKNOWN, 1415-1416 very faint audio.
1566 REPUBLIC OF KOREA, HLAZ 1412 weak.

Dennis,
Salmon Creek, WA
JRC 545  Drake R8B
NW ewe
Solar Indices SF=74 A=6 K=2
Local Sunset   1417 utc
  Sunrise  0140 utc
Moon rise  1421 utc 
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Scott Fybush

Patrick Martin wrote:


Why in the World did the FCC ever allow this
station to come on, is beyond me, as CKWX should be protected as they
have been on 1130 for decades. CKWX needs to really raise the roof on
this to the FCC.


Here's how this all plays out, as I understand it:

As a Canadian station, CKWX has no standing to complain directly to the 
FCC. They complain to Industry Canada, which takes the issue to Canada's 
equivalent of our State Department (the Foreign Ministry, I believe?), 
which takes it to the U.S. State Department, which takes it to the FCC.


The problem is, there's a treaty that regulates AM radio along the 
border. I'm working from memory here, so I may have some of the 
specifics wrong, but when the Mount Angel station was applied for, it 
had to make a showing that on paper, its signal would not exceed the 
interference levels specified in the treaty.


The current treaty was written in 1984, and it provides for only 
*groundwave* protection during daylight hours. In effect, the US and 
Canada agreed to pretend that critical hours skywave propagation 
doesn't exist.


It's rather a long, complex read, but here's the engineering exhibit 
from KPWX's application for a power increase:


http://bit.ly/9A6DWx

I'd direct your attention to page 2, where the respected engineering 
firm that did the application tells us that: Good engineering practice 
was followed for all measurements. Care was taken to avoid skywave 
during early morning and late afternoon hours.


CKWX can certainly complain...but its complaint will be hampered by the 
political reality that its own government signed a treaty 26 years ago 
that pretty much authorized the interference it's now receiving. Even if 
the treaty were to be amended (not an easy or quick process), stations 
authorized before the adoption of the revised treaty would still be 
grandfathered in.


It's not pretty...but that's international diplomacy for you.

s

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] Oklahoma TP's 10/7/10

2010-10-07 Thread Richard Allen
It was a great morning for hearing TP signals. However, several of the NHK 
powerhouses were heard and that made it a good morning here in north central 
Oklahoma. Receiver: Modified Tecsun PL-310  7.5-inch loopstick. Local sunrise 
at 1230 UTC.

558  unID het, 1159-1232.
567  JOIK, Sapporo J, 1219, //594, poor.
594  JOAK, Tokyo J, 1217, man  woman talking JJ, poor to fair. Barely audible 
1229-1233.
648  Probable VOR,Razdolnoye, het, 1158, faint, CKOM 650 QRM.
693  Probable JOAB, Tokyo J, het, 1227.
702  unID het, 1141, poor.
747  JOIB, Sapporo J, 1212, //774, poor, KRMG 740 QRM.
774  JOUB, Akita J, 1112, man speaking JJ, poor. At 1204, NHK2 Basic English 
lesson. At 1235-1239, strong het past sunrise, KSPI 780 QRM.  
828  JOBB, Osaka J, 1234, barely audible talk, fading to het at 1234.
873  Probable JOGB, Kumamoto J, het, 1224.

Missing this morning was any sign of HLCA 972.  

Good DX. 

Richard Allen
36°22'51N / 97°26'35W
(near Perry OK USA)
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] 518 Hawaii

2010-10-07 Thread Jim Renfrew

Jim Renfrew, Holley NY

0439 EDT   518NAVTEX OHonolulu, Hawaii
0530 EDT518NAVTEX WAstoria, oregon

First time I've had Hawaii in a while, logged on the south wire while asleep
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] [Amdx] 518 Hawaii

2010-10-07 Thread longwave
Nice catch Jim. I've been trying for any of the South American Navtex stations 
over the past couple of nights with one of the Wellbrooks in a north/south 
orientation but no joy. Hopefully between the Wellbrooks and soon to be erected 
Superloops I'll be able to pull some in. I've had Calif, all of North America 
and about half a dozen Euro stations to date. 

Keith McGinnis 
Hingham MA 
- Original Message - 
From: Jim Renfrew jrenf...@rochester.rr.com 
To: a...@nrcdxas.org, a...@wtfda.info, Mailing list for the International 
Radio Club of America irca@hard-core-dx.com 
Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 11:00:37 AM 
Subject: [Amdx] 518 Hawaii 

Jim Renfrew, Holley NY 

0439 EDT 518 NAVTEX O Honolulu, Hawaii 
0530 EDT 518 NAVTEX W Astoria, oregon 

First time I've had Hawaii in a while, logged on the south wire while asleep 
___ 
This is Amdx - The WTFDA AM DX List. 
Amdx mailing list 
Post to: a...@lists.wtfda.info 
Your Info Page: http://lists.wtfda.info/listinfo.cgi/amdx-wtfda.info 
Visit the WTFDA Forum at http://www.wtfda.info to view or upload your audio 
files! Register first. 
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Oklahoma TP's 10/7/10

2010-10-07 Thread Richard Allen
Correction.  The first sentence should be It wasn't instead of It was.  
Sorry.  Richard.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Richard Allen 
  To: IRCA@hard-core-dx.com 
  Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:37 AM
  Subject: [IRCA] Oklahoma TP's 10/7/10


  It was a great morning for hearing TP signals. However, several of the NHK 
powerhouses were heard and that made it a good morning here in north central 
Oklahoma. Receiver: Modified Tecsun PL-310  7.5-inch loopstick. Local sunrise 
at 1230 UTC.

  558  unID het, 1159-1232.
  567  JOIK, Sapporo J, 1219, //594, poor.
  594  JOAK, Tokyo J, 1217, man  woman talking JJ, poor to fair. Barely 
audible 1229-1233.
  648  Probable VOR,Razdolnoye, het, 1158, faint, CKOM 650 QRM.
  693  Probable JOAB, Tokyo J, het, 1227.
  702  unID het, 1141, poor.
  747  JOIB, Sapporo J, 1212, //774, poor, KRMG 740 QRM.
  774  JOUB, Akita J, 1112, man speaking JJ, poor. At 1204, NHK2 Basic English 
lesson. At 1235-1239, strong het past sunrise, KSPI 780 QRM.  
  828  JOBB, Osaka J, 1234, barely audible talk, fading to het at 1234.
  873  Probable JOGB, Kumamoto J, het, 1224.

  Missing this morning was any sign of HLCA 972.  
  
  Good DX. 

  Richard Allen
  36°22'51N / 97°26'35W
  (near Perry OK USA)
  ___
  IRCA mailing list
  IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
  http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

  Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

  For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

  To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] Arizona TP's for 10-7-10

2010-10-07 Thread Bill Block

Listened from 1305-1335 utc and all audio and carriers were on the bottom part 
of the band.  I  can't say if the conditions today were better than yesterday 
as I did not turn the radio on yesterday due to the big t-storms than we had.  
Today I had no t-storm noise but still I had lots of noise.
 
594  JOAK Japan 1320 utc man-woman talking.
693  JOAB Japan 1322 utc man-woman talking
774  JOUB Japan 1325 utc with Better English with a man-woman.
 
Bill Block
Prescott Valley, AZ
Drake R8   
 
  
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Patrick Martin
Thanks Scott. I agree, it is not pretty, but I am sure CKWX has the
power and money needed to handle everything legal. In the meantime, if
anything is done, the listeners in the Frasier Valley will suffer. 
I guess they can wire the money needed to buy the Mount Angel station
and shut it down. hi. That is an option. But maybe they do have an
option to run traffic and news on a translator in the valley on FM?
Stay tuned, I am sure this is not a done deal.

73,

Patrick 

Patrick Martin
Seaside OR 
KGED QSL Manager

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Paul B. Walker, Jr.
Getting a low pwoer relay or changing format of an FM is much tougher in
Canada then in the US.. you have to get approval to change formats even in
Canada

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Patrick Martin mwd...@webtv.net wrote:

 Thanks Scott. I agree, it is not pretty, but I am sure CKWX has the
 power and money needed to handle everything legal. In the meantime, if
 anything is done, the listeners in the Frasier Valley will suffer.
 I guess they can wire the money needed to buy the Mount Angel station
 and shut it down. hi. That is an option. But maybe they do have an
 option to run traffic and news on a translator in the valley on FM?
 Stay tuned, I am sure this is not a done deal.

 73,

 Patrick

 Patrick Martin
 Seaside OR
 KGED QSL Manager

 ___
  IRCA mailing list
 IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
 original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
 IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

 To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Scott Fybush

Patrick Martin wrote:

There is gotta be something CKWX can do, as their listeners in the
Frasier Valley are putting with the interference. 


I'm sure CKWX wishes it were so - but there really may not be much they 
can do, at least in the short term. The FM dial in the Puget Sound 
region is so overcrowded that I can't imagine a frequency being 
available for them to add an FM signal serving the Fraser Valley.


As a Canadian company, Rogers can't even legally buy KPWX to shut it down.

Perhaps the best precedent I can think of also came from Rogers, a long 
time ago. CFTR 680 was a 25 kW signal from a 13-tower array in 
Mississauga, west of Toronto, and its signal in parts of the Toronto 
area was hurt by the nulls it had to provide to WNYR 680, a non-DA 
250-watt daytimer in Rochester, about 90 miles across the lake to the 
southeast. Rochester had been there first - it signed on in 1947, while 
Toronto only arrived on 680 in the 1960s, when Rogers moved what was 
then CHFI from 1540 to 680 and CHLO in St. Thomas, Ontario from 680 to 1570.


It took several years of high-level international negotiations (the 
State Department and its Canadian counterpart were involved), but Rogers 
brokered a deal that allowed WNYR in Rochester to move to 990, which was 
a Canadian clear channel. Canada agreed to waive its treaty protections 
to let Rochester use the channel, and Rogers paid for a new and very 
expensive six-tower directional array for 990 in Rochester. Getting WNYR 
off 680 allowed CFTR to move to a much better site due south of Toronto 
in Grimsby, Ontario, where it increased power to 50 kW, all blasted due 
north into Toronto.


I *think* (though I haven't done the math on it) that part of the 
problem CKWX is experiencing from KPWX is the result of KPWX using VERY 
short towers, which result in a skywave takeoff angle that creates 
close-in skywave right over Vancouver. Since the treaties don't address 
daytime skywave, there's no penalty to KPWX for doing this, and KPWX 
benefits by saving money on tower construction. (Their towers are 
really, REALLY short - 53 electrical degrees in height, compared to 90 
degrees for a more typical class B station and 190 degrees for a typical 
class A.)


If KPWX could get zoning permission to build taller towers (and that's 
far from guaranteed these days!), I suspect much of the critical-hours 
skywave issue could be ameliorated...and paying for taller towers would 
probably end up being a lot cheaper for CKWX than the legal hassles 
they'd get into if they try to fight what's probably an otherwise 
unwinnable fight.


(I am not a lawyer or an engineering consultant, etc...)

s
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Oklahoma TPs 10-7

2010-10-07 Thread Glenn Hauser
** JAPAN [and non]. Another trans-Pacific MW bandscan on 9 kHz steps, Oct 7 
from 1154, detected carriers in LSB position: 567, 594, 747. At 1201 in USB 
position, signals must have been peaking: 556, 567, 585, 594, 648, 693, 747, 
774, 828, 855-, 882, 891, 972, 1053, 1098, 1116, 1197, 1287. But most of them 
were just barely detectable weak carriers, given away by the pitch of their 
hets against the off-tuned BFO.

Meanwhile I concentrated on 747 as best bet for audio, from 300 kW NHK-2, JOIB 
Sapporo: at 1159 a bit of audio; 1200 resounding prolonged timesignal tone, but 
could not hear pips leading up to it. 1208 now definitely audio, alternating 
Japanese and elementary American English phrases in language lesson; gone by 
1212 as were the other carriers. Had more problem from KRMG 740 Tulsa splatter 
than anything on 750.

As before, using DX-398 indoors with AC, internal ferrite antenna only, while 
abed (Glenn Hauser, Enid OK, DX LISTENING DIGEST) 



  
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] WWV Solar Report

2010-10-07 Thread Ng1u
:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt
:Issued: 2010 Oct 07 1805 UTC
# Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center
#
#  Geophysical Alert Message
#
Solar-terrestrial indices for 06 October follow.
Solar flux 74 and mid-latitude A-index 6.
The mid-latitude K-index at 1800 UTC on 07 October was 1 (5 nT).
No space weather storms were observed for the past 24 hours.
No space weather storms are expected for the next 24 hours.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Trends -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Date 06   06   06   06   06   06   06   07   07   07   07   07   07   07   
UTC  0300 0600 0900 1200 1500 1800 2100  0300 0600 0900 1200 1500 1800 
SFlx 75   75   75   75   75   75   74   74   74   74   74   74   74   74   
A-in 66666666666666
K-in 10323111122221
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Russ Edmunds
My read isn't that this is a daytime skywave issue but rather a sunrise/sunset 
issue, although the same solution might still help.

Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
wb2...@yahoo.com
FM: Yamaha T-80  Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Modified Sony ICF 2010 barefoot


--- On Thu, 10/7/10, Scott Fybush sc...@fybush.com wrote:

 From: Scott Fybush sc...@fybush.com
 Subject: Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference
 To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America 
 irca@hard-core-dx.com
 Date: Thursday, October 7, 2010, 2:30 PM
 Patrick Martin wrote:
  There is gotta be something CKWX can do, as their
 listeners in the
  Frasier Valley are putting with the interference. 
 
 I'm sure CKWX wishes it were so - but there really may not
 be much they can do, at least in the short term. The FM dial
 in the Puget Sound region is so overcrowded that I can't
 imagine a frequency being available for them to add an FM
 signal serving the Fraser Valley.
 
 As a Canadian company, Rogers can't even legally buy KPWX
 to shut it down.
 
 Perhaps the best precedent I can think of also came from
 Rogers, a long time ago. CFTR 680 was a 25 kW signal from a
 13-tower array in Mississauga, west of Toronto, and its
 signal in parts of the Toronto area was hurt by the nulls it
 had to provide to WNYR 680, a non-DA 250-watt daytimer in
 Rochester, about 90 miles across the lake to the southeast.
 Rochester had been there first - it signed on in 1947, while
 Toronto only arrived on 680 in the 1960s, when Rogers moved
 what was then CHFI from 1540 to 680 and CHLO in St. Thomas,
 Ontario from 680 to 1570.
 
 It took several years of high-level international
 negotiations (the State Department and its Canadian
 counterpart were involved), but Rogers brokered a deal that
 allowed WNYR in Rochester to move to 990, which was a
 Canadian clear channel. Canada agreed to waive its treaty
 protections to let Rochester use the channel, and Rogers
 paid for a new and very expensive six-tower directional
 array for 990 in Rochester. Getting WNYR off 680 allowed
 CFTR to move to a much better site due south of Toronto in
 Grimsby, Ontario, where it increased power to 50 kW, all
 blasted due north into Toronto.
 
 I *think* (though I haven't done the math on it) that part
 of the problem CKWX is experiencing from KPWX is the result
 of KPWX using VERY short towers, which result in a skywave
 takeoff angle that creates close-in skywave right over
 Vancouver. Since the treaties don't address daytime skywave,
 there's no penalty to KPWX for doing this, and KPWX benefits
 by saving money on tower construction. (Their towers are
 really, REALLY short - 53 electrical degrees in height,
 compared to 90 degrees for a more typical class B station
 and 190 degrees for a typical class A.)
 
 If KPWX could get zoning permission to build taller towers
 (and that's far from guaranteed these days!), I suspect much
 of the critical-hours skywave issue could be
 ameliorated...and paying for taller towers would probably
 end up being a lot cheaper for CKWX than the legal hassles
 they'd get into if they try to fight what's probably an
 otherwise unwinnable fight.
 
 (I am not a lawyer or an engineering consultant, etc...)
 
 s
 ___
 IRCA mailing list
 IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
 
 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are
 those of the original contributors and do not necessarily
 reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing
 staff, or officers
 
 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
 
 To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
 
 


  
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread scott
 My read isn't that this is a daytime skywave issue but rather a
 sunrise/sunset issue, although the same solution might still help.

It's the same thing, is it not? The reason CKWX gets hammered just after
sunrise and just before sunset is because the skywave hasn't died down
yet, so those 25 gallons of KPWX come blaring in, whereas during the rest
of the day it's all groundwave and the signal behaves the way it's
supposed to on paper.
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Russ Edmunds
It is, but my thought was that sunrise/sunset enhancement will still be there 
even if they used larger towers.


Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
wb2...@yahoo.com
FM: Yamaha T-80  Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Modified Sony ICF 2010 barefoot


--- On Thu, 10/7/10, sc...@fybush.com sc...@fybush.com wrote:

 From: sc...@fybush.com sc...@fybush.com
 Subject: Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference
 To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America 
 irca@hard-core-dx.com
 Date: Thursday, October 7, 2010, 4:47 PM
  My read isn't that this is a
 daytime skywave issue but rather a
  sunrise/sunset issue, although the same solution might
 still help.
 
 It's the same thing, is it not? The reason CKWX gets
 hammered just after
 sunrise and just before sunset is because the skywave
 hasn't died down
 yet, so those 25 gallons of KPWX come blaring in, whereas
 during the rest
 of the day it's all groundwave and the signal behaves the
 way it's
 supposed to on paper.
 ___
 IRCA mailing list
 IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
 
 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are
 those of the original contributors and do not necessarily
 reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing
 staff, or officers
 
 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
 
 To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
 
 


  
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 10-6

2010-10-07 Thread D1028Gary
Hi Nick,
 
The 756 kHz mix here yesterday morning had two different voices fading in  
and out, generally managing to make each other mutually  unintelligible. One 
was certainly CNR1 Chinese, but the other wasn't clear (it  sounded like 
Korean).
 
I've had the 756-CNR1 echoes here myself last year, but for some reason the 
 756 Chinese stations have seemed fairly well synchronized during  the 
brief periods of strong reception here this season. Maybe I'm getting  only one 
of them, instead of several like you are?
 
73, Gary
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/6/2010 11:04:39 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
n...@ieee.org writes:

Were you  getting echoes on 756 at all Gary?Seemed that was what I 
was  getting here this morning, strange sounding but rather weak.

best  wishes,

Nick


At 02:53 07/10/2010, you wrote:
Hello  All,

  Asiatic propagation was improved from  most areas  this morning,
especially from China and Korea. There  were interesting TP  mixes on 
both 639 and
756 kHz as the  CNR1 stations had persistent   co-channels


___
IRCA  mailing  list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original  contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, 
its  editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information:  http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message:  irca@hard-core-dx.com


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread scott
 It is, but my thought was that sunrise/sunset enhancement will still be
 there even if they used larger towers.

The height of the towers controls the takeoff angle for the skywave. If I
understand it correctly, the shorter towers give off more high-angle
radiation, which means a shorter distance to the first skip back to
ground. There will still be skywave if they raise the height of the
towers, but it will come off the towers at a lower angle and skip back to
ground at a greater distance...ideally somewhere in central or northern BC
instead of metro Vancouver.

s
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread rfoxwor1

 part of the 
 problem CKWX is experiencing from KPWX is the result 

Is it just a coincidence that the 2 sets of call letters are
so similar sounding?

(Their towers are 
 really, REALLY short - 53 electrical degrees in height, compared to 90 
 degrees for a more typical class B station and 190 degrees for a typical 
 class A.)

I figure 53 degrees at this freq is a tower height of 128 feet.
Is this about where they are at? Do they even have to light them?

- Bob


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Paul B. Walker, Jr.
At 128 feet, no they don't have to be lit unless they are in the flight path
of an airport.



On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:29 PM, rfoxw...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:


  part of the
  problem CKWX is experiencing from KPWX is the result

 Is it just a coincidence that the 2 sets of call letters are
 so similar sounding?

 (Their towers are
  really, REALLY short - 53 electrical degrees in height, compared to 90
  degrees for a more typical class B station and 190 degrees for a typical
  class A.)

 I figure 53 degrees at this freq is a tower height of 128 feet.
 Is this about where they are at? Do they even have to light them?

 - Bob


 ___
 IRCA mailing list
 IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
 original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
 IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

 To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] QSL Received for 1710 Khz NRC BEACON.......Thanks FRED!!!!

2010-10-07 Thread Robert S.Ross VA3SW

 Hi Guys:

  Today in the Mail I received a QSL Card for the Sept/09-10 Test of 
the NRC Beacon on 1710 Khz!! Thanks to Fred Vobbe for arranging the 
test..and for sending the QSL!!


Full Data National Radio Club Card with Date/Time/Freq Listed.

Also states that it was 1 WATT into a Vertical Antenna 157 Feet high. 
Transmission originated from ALLEN COUNTY, OHIO.


QSL Numbered #20100910-1.which I assume is QSL # 1 for this 
Broadcast


This was for my Reception on a SONY SRF-T615 Ultralight Radio...BAREFOOT!!!

Thanks to Fred and all involved in making this happen!!

73.ROB VA3SW

Robert S. Ross
London, Ontario CANADA
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] KPWX 1130 Mount Angel Tower Pictures

2010-10-07 Thread vroomski



Greetings,

I have 5 pictures of KPWX towers taken just after they started testing.  The 
towers are in a farming/ranching area
of Mount Angel.  The pictures were taken around November of 2009, if I remember 
right.  Pictures are not that good,
it is narrow road with few places to park.  The center picture shows all three 
towers.  As Scott said, the towers are
short.

Click the link below and the pictures will be on the bottom row

http://home.comcast.net/~vroomski/site/?/photos/PHPSESSID=065b14599170db5aa850d2d45ef6ff5f

Dennis,
Salmon Creek, WA
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Scott Fybush

rfoxw...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
part of the 
problem CKWX is experiencing from KPWX is the result 


Is it just a coincidence that the 2 sets of call letters are
so similar sounding?


I believe so, yes. Those aren't the original calls - they were picked 
after the station was sold to Amador Bustos, who likes his calls to end 
with X.


(Their towers are 
really, REALLY short - 53 electrical degrees in height, compared to 90 
degrees for a more typical class B station and 190 degrees for a typical 
class A.)


I figure 53 degrees at this freq is a tower height of 128 feet.
Is this about where they are at? Do they even have to light them?


That appears to be correct - there's no top-loading indicated in any of 
KPWX's applications.


It may be that 128 feet was simply as much tower as they could get past 
local zoning...but I think one of the issues here is that the Mount 
Angel station was built on spec - the applicant evidently had no 
intention of operating the station, just to build it out and sell it. 
There's no incentive to build it right under those circumstances...and 
part of the problem here is that Mount Angel simply was built on the 
cheap. There was a time when the FCC would not have licensed 53-degree 
towers for a 50 kW stations.


s
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 10-7

2010-10-07 Thread D1028Gary
Hello All,
 
 Asian propagation seemed slightly down this  morning compared to 
yesterday, although the TP big guns from  Japan, Korea, China and Russia had 
no 
problem showing up with decent audio. The  weaker Chinese stations were in 
and out of the noise, while the 639 and 756  CNR1 stations had no weak 
co-channels like yesterday. 936  kHz continued its October big gun 
performance, 
and the Korean Jammer was  near full strength. 
 Thanks to Bruce's information on 936-Anhui's  English programming, I 
was able to investigate the station's format a  little more this morning. 
During the 1400-1415 time period (late Thursday night  in China) the station 
apparently has a Chinese version of NHK2's Radio  English Conversation 
program, in which a female Chinese speaker gives commentary  on an English 
speech. 
This morning's lesson (during fair to good  936-Anhui signals) was on the 
English speech delivered yesterday  morning around this same time. During this 
month of October, 936-Anhui would be  a good bet for those DXers needing 
their first China reception, along with  639-CNR1, 756-CNR1, 981-CNR1, 
1044-CRI (in Japanese from  1330-1430) and 1377-CNR1.
 
 The following were heard on a C.Crane SWP Slider  model (7.5 
loopstick) inductively coupled to a 9' sided PVC tuned passive loop  (in the 
back 
yard). A modified ICF-2010 (30 loopstick) was used as an SSB  spotting 
receiver:
 
558  HLQH  Daegu, S. Korea  Weak music around 1342,  // weak 603
585  JOPG  Kushiro, Japan  Poor threshold audio around 1335  // 594
594  JOAK  Tokyo, Japan  Good Japanese talk program at  1334
603  HLSA  Namyang, S. Korea  Weak-fair Korean music at  1342
639  CNR1  China Synchros  Fair-good with male- female  Chinese talk  
 (and no QRM) around 1405  
_http://www.mediafire.com/?b53t6u1bprusfrk_ 
(http://www.mediafire.com/?b53t6u1bprusfrk) 
648  VOR   Razdolnoye, Russia  Good Chinese  external program 1353
657  Pyongyang BS, N. Korea  Strong KK tirades and old music,  1351
666  JOBK  Osaka, Japan  Fair-good Japanese conversation at  1346
675  VOV  Hanoi, Vietnam  Barely reached threshold audio at  1345
738  TP-Mix  Fair mix of BEL2-Taiwan and HKLG at  1335; unlike
  previous  days Taiwan's audio (Chinese music) sounded OK 
747  JOIB  Sapporo, Japan  Strong Japanese ID in KXL  splatter 1400 
756  CNR1  China Synchros  Fair-good with Chinese  talk at 1350
774  JOUB  Akita, Japan  Weak audio in huge KTTH splatter  1355
828  JOBB  Osaka, Japan Fair-good English study program at  1340
918  China (presumed Shandong) Threshold audio at best, 1409
927  China (presumed)  Threshold audio, apparently Chinese, at  1410
936  Anhui, China  English study program at 1403; female  Chinese
  announcer gives  commentary on yesterday's English language
  speech (fair-good  strength) 
_http://www.mediafire.com/?agrpjdzjcr3f7f6_ 
(http://www.mediafire.com/?agrpjdzjcr3f7f6) 
972HLCA  Dangjin, S. Korea  Fair Korean  conversation 1411
1035  CNR1  China Synchros  Fair Chinese speech and music  1409
1044  CRI  Jiangsu, China  Good Japanese external program at  1356
1053  Korean Jammer  Very strong over weak CC co-channel  1343
1134  TP-Mix  Weak mix of KBS (Korean) and apparent  CNR1 1337
1377  CNR1 (presumed)  Threshold Chinese audio at best today 
1566  HLAZ  Jeju, S. Korea  Weak Japanese religious  program 1331
1575  VOA  Ban Rassom, Thailand  Strong carrier at best  today
 
73 and Good DX,
Gary DeBock  
 
 
   
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] WWV Solar Report

2010-10-07 Thread Ng1u
:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt
:Issued: 2010 Oct 08 0005 UTC
# Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center
#
#  Geophysical Alert Message
#
Solar-terrestrial indices for 07 October follow.
Solar flux 75 and mid-latitude A-index 4.
The mid-latitude K-index at  UTC on 08 October was 1 (6 nT).
No space weather storms were observed for the past 24 hours.
No space weather storms are expected for the next 24 hours.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Trends -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Date 06   06   06   06   06   07   07   07   07   07   07   07   07   08   
UTC  0900 1200 1500 1800 2100  0300 0600 0900 1200 1500 1800 2100  
SFlx 75   75   75   75   74   74   74   74   74   74   74   74   75   75   
A-in 66666666666644
K-in 32311112222101
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] QSL Received for 1710 Khz NRC BEACON.......Thanks FRED!!!!

2010-10-07 Thread Saul DX
I also want to thank Fred. Just received a card in the mail, as well. I 
don't think I've received a QSL card in well over 25 years...


This will find a nice home in the DX shack...where it will inspire me to 
further catches.


Saul

- Original Message - 
From: Robert S.Ross VA3SW va...@rogers.com

To: IRCA AM List irca@hard-core-dx.com
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 7:04 PM
Subject: [IRCA] QSL Received for 1710 Khz NRC BEACON...Thanks FRED



 Hi Guys:

  Today in the Mail I received a QSL Card for the Sept/09-10 Test of the 
NRC Beacon on 1710 Khz!! Thanks to Fred Vobbe for arranging the test..and 
for sending the QSL!!


Full Data National Radio Club Card with Date/Time/Freq Listed.

Also states that it was 1 WATT into a Vertical Antenna 157 Feet high. 
Transmission originated from ALLEN COUNTY, OHIO.


QSL Numbered #20100910-1.which I assume is QSL # 1 for this 
Broadcast


This was for my Reception on a SONY SRF-T615 Ultralight 
Radio...BAREFOOT!!!


Thanks to Fred and all involved in making this happen!!

73.ROB VA3SW

Robert S. Ross
London, Ontario CANADA
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers


For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com




___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] QSL Received for 1710 Khz NRCBEACON.......Thanks FRED!!!!

2010-10-07 Thread Mark Durenberger
Nice going guys...but eat your heart out... 'cause I received the very first 
QSL in October 2004...on a similar 1710 test...copied in the Utah 
desert---same signal, same tower :-))


Regards,

Mark Durenberger

--
From: Saul DX sau...@sympatico.ca
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:20 PM
To: IRCA AM List irca@hard-core-dx.com; a...@nrcdxas.org
Subject: Re: [NRC-AM] [IRCA] QSL Received for 1710 Khz 
NRCBEACON...Thanks FRED



I also want to thank Fred. Just received a card in the mail, as well. I
don't think I've received a QSL card in well over 25 years...

This will find a nice home in the DX shack...where it will inspire me to
further catches.

Saul

- Original Message - 
From: Robert S.Ross VA3SW va...@rogers.com

To: IRCA AM List irca@hard-core-dx.com
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 7:04 PM
Subject: [IRCA] QSL Received for 1710 Khz NRC BEACON...Thanks FRED



 Hi Guys:

  Today in the Mail I received a QSL Card for the Sept/09-10 Test of the
NRC Beacon on 1710 Khz!! Thanks to Fred Vobbe for arranging the test..and
for sending the QSL!!

Full Data National Radio Club Card with Date/Time/Freq Listed.

Also states that it was 1 WATT into a Vertical Antenna 157 Feet high.
Transmission originated from ALLEN COUNTY, OHIO.

QSL Numbered #20100910-1.which I assume is QSL # 1 for this
Broadcast

This was for my Reception on a SONY SRF-T615 Ultralight
Radio...BAREFOOT!!!

Thanks to Fred and all involved in making this happen!!

73.ROB VA3SW

Robert S. Ross
London, Ontario CANADA
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com




___
The NRC AM mailing list
Questions? ow...@nrcdxas.org
Now Accepting Orders for the 31st Edition of the AM Radio Log and
The 21st Edition of the FM Atlas!
http://www.nrcdxas.org for the details 



___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] TP DX in Seattle 10-7-10

2010-10-07 Thread Bruce Portzer
 Conditions seemed to be down a bit from yesterday.  Koreans were down 
a bunch, Chinese were down a little, and the high powered NHK stations 
were about the same.


It was mainly the usual suspects today:

585JOPG fair //594 1355
594JOAK fair-good 1355
603KBS, fair w/KK talk 1355, the // on 558 wasn't heard
648VoR, good w/inst music 1354
693JOAB, good-fair, weaker than 747/774 1354
738Presumed Taiwan w/CC talk fair 1358
747JOIB good //774 1353
756CNR1 CC talk fair-good 1358, pips  ID 1400
774JOUB Good w/EE lessons 1353
918Woman talking in unid language, weak, probably China 1352
972Korea, fair 1351
981CNR1, decent signal, fair audio in CKNW splat 1351
1017Audio traces, presumed CRI 1350
1035CNR1, CC talk fair 1350, weak pips 1400
1053S Korea, jammer fair 1402
1206Yanbian PBS, fair w/Korean talk 1348

Bruce
R8A  SDR-IQ receivers, K9AY antenna
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Scott Fybush

neilkaz wrote:

Scott There was a time when the FCC would not have licensed
53-degree towers for a 50 kW stations.

KAZ replies that there was a time when our FCC had integrity and
wasn't a pawn of big corporarations and wasn't 100% clueless in
regards to both AM and FM engineering and propagation.


It's not the big corporations who want signals like KPWX on the air. The 
big corporations already have their good 50 kW signals with 
properly-designed antenna arrays, and they don't want the extra 
interference that stations like KPWX add to the dial.


It's the little guys who've been pushing the FCC for many decades now to 
find ways to cram more signals into an overcrowded dial. And all the way 
back to the Communications Act of 1934, there's been that mandate (you 
can look it up under section 307b) to provide a fair and equitable 
distribution of broadcast service, a mandate the FCC has consistently 
equated with more and more signals serving smaller and smaller areas.


This is not a new debate, and it goes back many decades to the days when 
the FCC really did have engineers running it. If Mark Durenberger's 
around, I'm sure he can offer links to the excellent writing he did a 
while back about the lengthy process by which the original clear 
channels were broken down.


And having said that, there's never really been a time when the FCC has 
been entirely independent of what the large corporate broadcasters want. 
There's a long history of corporate broadcasting executives becoming FCC 
commissioners or vice versa; look back 60 years to the days when Charles 
Denny moved straight from a chair on the FCC to a cushy executive job 
with RCA, just after he'd conveniently quashed the CBS color TV system 
in favor of RCA's, or to the more respectable service of Jim Quello as 
FCC chairman after a distinguished career running WJR in Detroit.


s
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



[IRCA] Victoria, BC TP's for 10/7/2010

2010-10-07 Thread Walter Salmaniw
Finally had a chance to listen this morning from 13:45 to 14:23 UTC.
Yesterday afternoon was a beautiful day, with summer like weather here in
Victoria.  I used a couple of hours to finally erect a couple of antennae:
A 26' x 33' or so 285 degree corner fed loop (nothing like my old place that
had 50' trees, but still, it's not too bad).  This azimuth cuts more or less
just off shore of the east coast of Asia/Indonesia.  On top of that, I also
erected a fairly small diameter (perhaps 30' circumference) ALA 100 loop
aimed about 20/200 towards Europe (and NZ to a lesser extent).  There's
still space to erect a larger corner fed loop 18 degrees which would be very
nice towards Europe (and AK to a lesser extent), but this would take a bit
more work.  The dimensions could be around 26' x 40' or so.  Alternatively,
I could also simply use this larger loop to feed the ALA for better gain.
Overall, I'm fairly pleased with my new set-up, 1/2 block to the ocean
(Straits of Juan de Fuca) which faces north west.
 I have nothing to compare with, but for a first start, I wasn't too
unhappy.  I suspect conditions were about average for this time of the
year.  Noted that the SF was 74, A6, and K2.  Here are my brief notes.  I'll
continue to use my (originally derived by John Bryant) 10 point scale, with
a 6 = just audible (like Nick's burbles in the splatter), 7= just able to
id language, 8= fairly OK reception, 9= excellent reception, and 10=
armchair local quality copy.

279:  8.5
558:  HLQH presumed at 7
567:  JJ, // to 594 at 7
576:  7 level, possibly RR
594:  JOAK at 9 level
603:  7 level
639:  7 level, pretty sure it was NHK1
666:  6 level
670:  KDLG Dillingham at 9 level
675:  6 level
747:  JOUB at 8.5 level
756:  6 level
774:  9 level JOIB, with cochannel Australian (latter heard on the ALA)
828:  8.5 level JJ
846, 864, 918, 954:  all 6 level
963:  CRI RR at 7 level
972:  HLCA KK at 7 level
1008, 1017, 1026:  all 6 level
1098:  strong OC
1116:  4BC at 7 level at 14:07
1143:  7 level
1278:  6 level
1287:  8 level JJ
1314, 1377, 1386, 1548, 1566:  all 6 level only
X-band:  pretty dead save for weak carriers on 1701.

That's it from Victoria, BC.  Good DX to all!  ...Walt
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] TP DX in Seattle 10-7-10

2010-10-07 Thread Walter Salmaniw
Bruce, I'm happy that it wasn't just me that noted very little on the upper
band.  Where's 1566 and 1575 today?  Walt
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Victoria, BC TP's for 10/7/2010

2010-10-07 Thread Colin Newell


On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:59:05 + Walter Salmaniw can...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally had a chance to listen this morning from 13:45 to 14:23 UTC.
Yesterday afternoon was a beautiful day, with summer like weather here in
Victoria.  I used a couple of hours to finally erect a couple of antennae:

Welcome back OM!



Colin Newell is the editor and creator of Coffeecrew.com and BobHarris.com
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Victoria, BC TP's for 10/7/2010

2010-10-07 Thread Walter Salmaniw
Nice to be back again, Colin.  Back in the saddle, as they say.  Conditions
on HF don't seem to be all that great, with DRM on 11675 not propagating
that well from RNZI at the moment (about 25% copy).  Better go down to the
MW band again.  Crummy MUF.  Wanna give me a hand erecting my last corner
fed loop sometime?  ..Walt

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Colin Newell c...@islandnet.com wrote:



 On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:59:05 + Walter Salmaniw can...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Finally had a chance to listen this morning from 13:45 to 14:23 UTC.
 Yesterday afternoon was a beautiful day, with summer like weather here in
 Victoria.  I used a couple of hours to finally erect a couple of antennae:

 Welcome back OM!



 Colin Newell is the editor and creator of Coffeecrew.com and BobHarris.com
 ___
 IRCA mailing list
 IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
 original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
 IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

 To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com


___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Victoria, BC TP's for 10/7/2010

2010-10-07 Thread Walter Salmaniw
Oops, that was meant for Colin personally.  Sorry...Walt
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Patrick Martin
The height of the towers controls the takeoff angle for the skywave.
If I understand it correctly, the shorter towers give off more
high-angle radiation, which means a shorter distance to the first skip
back to ground. There will still be skywave if they raise the height of
the towers, but it will come off the towers at a lower angle and skip
back to ground at a greater distance...ideally somewhere in central or
northern BC instead of metro Vancouver.

I wonder if there will be some fix in the future to try and help the
situation as you described? I would think something would be done. 

Patrick

Patrick Martin
Seaside OR 
KGED QSL Manager

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference

2010-10-07 Thread Patrick Martin
Scott,

 Don't we have something in International laws to protect CKWX?  I
don't know if CKWX sells in the Frasier Valley, but a loss of revenue
might create a lawsuit? Like you, I have no clue, but I don't see how
some station can just get the okey from the FCC to build and cause QRM
Internationally? However, that is the case with IBOC and nothing has
been done to stop that from QRMing Canadian stations. If it was Cuba,
they would just boost CKWX's signal to 500 KW. hi.

73,

Patrick 

Patrick Martin
Seaside OR 
KGED QSL Manager

___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com