[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-11-21 Thread Christian Beikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16262041#comment-16262041
 ] 

Christian Beikov commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

I haven't yet looked into the JdbcConvention issue and I'm not sure I will have 
time for that before mid-december, so don't think this will make it into the 
release.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-11-19 Thread Julian Hyde (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16258809#comment-16258809
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1940:
--

[~christian.beikov], Is there any chance this change (or part of it) will be 
ready for release 1.15?

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-09-20 Thread Julian Hyde (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16173843#comment-16173843
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1940:
--

I've just pushed commit 
https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/commit/b17a2aa068d07f5a3483099e9efcc2252e348a55
 to my branch https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/tree/1940-dialect-sequence 
and I think the process of creating SqlDialect with sequence support is in good 
shape. In particular I replaced SequenceSupportResolver, which was frankly 
difficult to understand, with OptionalSequenceSupport, which is more concrete 
and only need to be implemented for one dialect (SQL Server).

I don't intend to look into the JdbcConvention issues any time soon. But 
anyway, commit b17a2aa0 would be a good point to start when you next start work.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-09-20 Thread Christian Beikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16172813#comment-16172813
 ] 

Christian Beikov commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

I looked through your changes and they look good to me so far, but as I 
mentioned a few times, the sequence PR isn't ready yet :D
I am still struggling with getting the sequence call being executed with the 
JdbcConvention because of (wrong?) planning, but maybe you have some time to 
take a look and find a solution for this. I'm a bit busy with other stuff now 
until the weekend anyway, so just tell me when you are ready so that I can pick 
up work from that point.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-09-10 Thread Christian Beikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16160314#comment-16160314
 ] 

Christian Beikov commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

[~julianhyde] I don't think it makes sense as that would require quite a 
rewrite and might not be fully what you agree with either. Apart from that, the 
sequence calls are still not pushed down to the DBMS yet so this is still a bit 
away from being done.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-09-08 Thread Julian Hyde (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16159255#comment-16159255
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1940:
--

It seems that we cannot fix this case (CALCITE-1940) without first doing 
CALCITE-1913 (make SqlDialect more extensible). [~christian.beikov], Do you 
think it makes sense to re-organize PR 514 into commits that fix 1913 followed 
by commits that fix 1940? It would make it easier to review. The PR is already 
large, and I disagree with some parts but not others.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-09-07 Thread Julian Hyde (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16157306#comment-16157306
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1940:
--

Yes, I meant 1913. Thanks for the correction.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-09-07 Thread Chris Baynes (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16157225#comment-16157225
 ] 

Chris Baynes commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

[~julianhyde] I think you mean 
[CALCITE-1913|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1913] where there's 
a discussion about including the db version in the dialect.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-09-06 Thread Christian Beikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16156072#comment-16156072
 ] 

Christian Beikov commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

The idea is to encapsulate all the dialect specifics and at the same time 
making the system pluggable. By doing the non-standard unparsing stuff through 
dialect methods, it is possible for consumers of calcite to define a custom 
dialect targeted for their needs. Right now, only sequence fetch rendering is 
handled that way, but I plan to remove all checks against the database product 
of a dialect like e.g. {{dialect.getDatabaseProduct() == 
DatabaseProduct.MYSQL}} that are currently spread around the code base. I'd 
rather have methods that return whether a dialect supports a specific feature 
or handle rendering/unparsing an expression, clause or whole query than checks 
in the main code base that only work for specific database products.
One of the most recent changes of supported features is MySQL since version 8 
will have support for e.g. CTEs. How would the current code handle that? The 
way I am proposing it, the MysqlDialect can self configure during 
instantiation, detect based on the version if a feature is supported and make 
the capability accessible to the code that handles the unparsing.

Apart from that, I'd still need to know how to actually make the planner choose 
the correct plan. Since there is no Jdbc input to the Project node, the query 
isn't rendered with the JdbcConvention. Any idea how I could achieve that?

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-09-04 Thread Christian Beikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16152922#comment-16152922
 ] 

Christian Beikov commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

No worries. I didn't bet on this getting into 1.14 especially since I wanted to 
tackle the sql dialect specific handling as part of this.
The lifecycle doesn't change, it's still bound to the schema, the handler was 
just merged into the dialect and dialect is now self configuring in the 
constructor. This is only a first step, so please don't look to deep into that 
yet.
For now, I would just like to make a {{RexSeqCall}} be executed with the 
appropriate convention. Currently, the call is implemented via RexImpTable and 
I have no idea how to force that expression be implemented by the 
JdbcConvention. Any idea how to do that?
After that, I would replace all the static {{DatabaseProduct}} usages with 
appropriate methods in the dialect to handle implementing the SQL translation. 
When I'm done with that, you can review it as a whole, but the current state is 
still incomplete.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-09-02 Thread Christian Beikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16151573#comment-16151573
 ] 

Christian Beikov commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

I introduced a custom RexCall subclass since I need to store the RelNode 
representing the sequence table, but now I'd need to enforce the usage of the 
"correct" plan. Currently the optimizer generates plans that use the linq4j 
implementation which is "wrong". Maybe you could take a look at the PR and tell 
me how to do that best?

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-09-02 Thread Christian Beikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16151561#comment-16151561
 ] 

Christian Beikov commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

Ok I understand how that works now, I was just confused because the SQL string 
was generated(apparently for no reason?) within the Prepare class. Anyway, I'm 
having a different problem now with the sequence implementation. The plan looks 
like {{LogicalProject(NEXT VALUE FOR S2) -> LogicalValues( (0) )}} and during 
rule registration, no JDBC rules are registered since there is no JDBC relation 
used in RelNode. Any hints on how I can achieve that the plan gets converted to 
{{JdbcProject(NEXT VALUE FOR S2) -> JdbcValues( (0) )}}?

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-08-31 Thread Chris Baynes (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16149174#comment-16149174
 ] 

Chris Baynes commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

I tried this out with postgres and noticed a problem - postgres (unlike other 
dbs) already returns a list of sequences in the jdbc metadata. So the table map 
building fails because of duplicates. It probably makes sense to just always 
skip {{SEQUENCE}} and {{TEMPORARY_SEQUENCE}} in the loop, and only get them 
from the dialect sequence information.

I can't really comment right now on your dialect handling improvement, since 
I'm still not sure why the dialect handling here needs something different than 
what already exists. The dialect handlers are already able to push-down calls 
to different dbs as long as the planner finds the right plan.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-08-31 Thread Christian Beikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16148807#comment-16148807
 ] 

Christian Beikov commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

I need the dialect since I have to call the unparse method on it. If we have a 
query like e.g. "select next value for s1.seq, next value for s2.seq" and s1 
and s2 are schemas that have different dialects, I have to unparse the sequence 
call once for the dialect of s1 and once for s2. I somehow need to know in the 
{{SqlWriter}} which dialect a schema uses so that I can call the appropriate 
unparse method.
Could you([~chris-baynes]) maybe comment on the mailing list thread 
"JdbcAdapter Sort Limit and Offset" which is somewhat related in the overall 
discussion about how to handle the different dialect quirks. I'd like to 
essentially merge the {{Handler}} and other methods into a DBMS specific 
{{SqlDialect}} implementation and do the dialect construction through a 
configurable factory.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-08-30 Thread Christian Beikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16148071#comment-16148071
 ] 

Christian Beikov commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

Depends on what you want changed. I was kind of waiting for a comment from 
[~chris-baynes] on how to do that best.
The part about retrieving the dialect during unparsing is still unclear to me. 
How should that be done? Currently I am, as you stated, wrongly assuming a 
single dialect.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-08-30 Thread Julian Hyde (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16147982#comment-16147982
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1940:
--

Do you think we could get this done for 1.14? OK if not.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-08-23 Thread Christian Beikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16139487#comment-16139487
 ] 

Christian Beikov commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

Seems I only use {{JdbcTable.jdbcTableName}} to get a proper toString 
representation for the sequence.
I wasn't sure how to get the dialect during unparsing and since the writer 
already had a getter, I thought it might be appropriate to just get the proper 
one in. I suppose the writer should be extended to be able to return a dialect 
for a schema name?
I'll adapt the PR to the requested changes and let you know when it's done.

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-08-23 Thread Julian Hyde (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16139445#comment-16139445
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1940:
--

Good idea. Reviewing 
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/514/commits/99e6ca890431d5f55be23924844f6d3f0058f364:
* Why do you need {{JdbcTable.jdbcTableName}}?
* The code in {{CalcitePrepareImpl}} that grabs a {{SqlDialect}} (in fact the 
idea of a unique {{SqlDialect}} for the whole query) is dubious. What the query 
is a union between a MySQL database and a PostgreSQL database?
* I like the idea of {{interface Sequence}}, and also {{JdbcSequence extends 
JdbcTable implements Sequence}} is just right
* We use camel case in class names, even those containing acronyms. Please 
rename {{DB2SequenceSupport}} to {{Db2SequenceSupport}}, 
{{MSSQLSequenceSupportResolver}} to {{MssqlSequenceSupportResolver}}
* Don't use {{FakeUtil.newInternal}}; just use {{new RuntimeException}}

Should {{SequenceSupport}} be rolled into {{Handler}}? 
{{SequenceSupport.unparseSequenceVal}} definitely fits into 
{{Handler.unparseCall}}. {{SequenceSupport.extract}} could go to either 
{{Handler}} or {{SqlDialect}}. [~chris-baynes], what do you think?

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1940) Implement dialect specific support for sequences

2017-08-20 Thread Christian Beikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16134428#comment-16134428
 ] 

Christian Beikov commented on CALCITE-1940:
---

See the following PR for a fix: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/514

> Implement dialect specific support for sequences
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1940
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Christian Beikov
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> The Calcite parser and validator already supports sequences but the push down 
> to the JDBC level is currently limited. SInce sequences are not supported on 
> all DBMS every sql dialect should have the possibility to render it's own way 
> of extracting sequence information or incrementing the value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)