Re: JDK 1.1.6 v4a Problems!

[K.R. Foley]

Sven Werner wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I'm using Linux Kernel 2.0.35, libc5.4.46.
>
> When I'm using the above mentioned JDK it crashes like this:
>
> SIGSEGV   11*  segmentation violation
>
> Full thread dump:
> Monitor Cache Dump:
> Registered Monitor Dump:
> Monitor IO lock: 
> Child death monitor: 
> Event monitor: 
> I/O monitor: 
> Alarm monitor: 
> Monitor registry: 
> Thread Alarm Q:
>
> 
> I downloaded the libc5 Version. Some Ideas.
>
> Ciao!
>
> 
> -> E-Mail: Sven Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -> www   : http://www.ping.de/sites/hawaii-datteln
> 

Sven,

You might try renaming libc.so.5 and libdl.so.1 in the directory
/lib/i386/green_threads to some other name just so that it
can't be found by those names.  If I am not mistaken it is a conflict
with the versions of the libs that come with the JDK and the ones linux
uses.  If this doesn't work send the output from the command "ldconfig
-v".

Hope this helps,
K.R.

--
K.R. Foley
Alwan, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JDK 1.1.6 v4a Problems!

[Carsten Hoeger]

On Fri, Oct 30, Sven Werner wrote:

> I'm using Linux Kernel 2.0.35, libc5.4.46.
> 
> When I'm using the above mentioned JDK it crashes like this:
> 
> SIGSEGV   11*  segmentation violation
> 
> Full thread dump:
> Monitor Cache Dump:
> Registered Monitor Dump:
> Monitor IO lock: 
> Child death monitor: 
> Event monitor: 
> I/O monitor: 
> Alarm monitor: 
> Monitor registry: 
> Thread Alarm Q:
> 
> 
> I downloaded the libc5 Version. Some Ideas.
> 


You find the solution at our Support-Database:

  JavaWorkshop and S.u.S.E. Linux 5.3 from
   :
--
`Applies to'

`S.u.S.E. Linux' : Version 5.3

  
  Symptom:

Java Workshop doesn't start correctly  after an update to S.u.S.E. 
5.3 and aborts with a core dump.
  
  Cause:

Together with S.u.S.E. Linux  Version  5.3  comes   a newer  ld.so 
library than needed by Java.
  
  Solution:

There are twopossibilitiesto use JavaWorkshop despite  the 
presence of the new library :

  
  - Install the package ldso.rpm of a former version   of S.u.S.E. 
Linux.

  - Displace the file
 such that it
cannot be used anymore by Java.



-- 
mfG,
Carsten Hoeger

+---+
| Carsten Hoeger   SuSE GmbH|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Schanzaeckerstr. 10  |
| http://www.suse.de   90443 Nuernberg, Germany |
+---+

Remove me from mailinglist.

[Ravindran Nagarajah]

Remove me from mailinglist

[Guru samy.K]

Re: HP wrong, Linux right... right?

[Dan Kegel]

Charles Forsythe wrote:
> I think they have a bug involving blocking I/O (which was a problem with
> Linux JDK at one point).  Is this really a bug, or is this acceptable
> behaviour.  Someone please tell me it's a bug.  They want to charge me
> $250/hr if they investigate it and it's not a bug.

Does HP implement native threads?  If so,
you may have wildly different results running
with the Blackdown JDK, which uses green threads.

Try running it on Windows NT using either Sun or MS Java;
I think they support native threads.
If it fails there, too, it may be your code.
- Dan

Re: JMEDIAFRAMEWORK

[Dan Kegel]

Patrick Lenders wrote:
> is there any plan to port java media framework to linux?

I haven't heard of any.  

It'd probably be a fresh implementation rather than a port,
given the nature of JMF.  There have been other implementations-
check out Whipped Butter for MacOS - so it's not impossible.

Hardest part is, Linux lacks much codec support.  
You might be able to leverage xanim's codebase, though.

- Dan

Test Mail

[MANJU SATYA NANDA]

Hello
If I can get some java development info from your side, i would like to
keep in touch with you.
pl. reply
nanda

Re: StrongARM port

[Christopher Hinds]

What OS are we talking about anyway? Don't we have to port Linux to the
StrongARM platform first? The only OS's I know of to date are the Palm
Pilot
and Windows CE.

Warren Little wrote:

> Hello,
>  Was wondering if you folks had any plans to port the JDK to the
>   StrongARM processor (such as CCC's NetWinder).
>
>  Thanks,
>Warren Little[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: StrongARM port

[Michael Sinz]

On Fri, 30 Oct 1998 09:14:41 -0500, Christopher Hinds wrote:

>What OS are we talking about anyway? Don't we have to port Linux to the
>StrongARM platform first? The only OS's I know of to date are the Palm
>Pilot and Windows CE.

Actually, the Corel NetWinder and there other products are all on Linux.
In fact, they announced that it is now RedHat 5.1 (it used to be a
cross-compiled version of RedHat 4.2)


Michael Sinz -- Director of Research & Development, NextBus Inc.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.nextbus.com
My place on the web ---> http://www.users.fast.net/~michael_sinz

VS: NB!!Lykkevits!!!!!!

[Gunhild Johansen]

--
> Fra: Kristoffer Lein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Til: Ane Albertsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Kristoffer Kanestrøm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Kristel Høie Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jonas
Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Andreas Mikkelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Emne: Fwd: NB!!Lykkevits!!
> Dato: 29. oktober 1998 14:45
> 
> On 10/29/98 at 14:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > Return-Path: <>
> > Received: from default (mp-217-240-30.daxnet.no [193.217.240.30]) by 
> > online.no (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA03518 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 
> > 29 Oct 1998 14:18:01 +0100 (MET)
> > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
> > Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 14:13:39 +0100
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: Andreas Mikkelsen <>
> > Subject: Fwd: NB!!Lykkevits!!
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > X-UIDL: 3bd948680bcbb9872fb45681c7aa8bf2
> > 
> > >X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32)
> > >Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 08:43:26 +0200
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >From: Camilla Bredesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (by way of Renate
Mikkelsen
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> > >Subject: NB!!Lykkevits!!
> > >
> > >>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 11:37:56 +0200
> > >>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>From: "Alf Inge Skarvik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (by way of Line
Skarvik
> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) (by way of Renate Mikkelsen
> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> > >>Subject: NB!!Lykkevits!!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Received: from 195.204.236.55 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
> > >>>   Sun, 18 Oct 1998 15:04:08 PDT
> > >>>X-Originating-IP: [195.204.236.55]
> > >>>From: "Lemet Ivar Haetta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 
> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>Subject: English joke
> > >>>Content-Type: text/plain
> > >>>Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 15:04:08 PDT
> > >>>
> > >>-- Forwarded message --
> > >>
> > >>HOLD ON TO YOUR BALLS
> > >>
> > >>THE LITTLE OLD LADY AND THE BET
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>A little old lady went into the Bank of Canada one day, 
> > >>>carrying a
> > >> bag of money.  She insisted that she must speak with the
> > >president of
> > >>the bank to open a savings account because, "It's a lot
of 
> > >>>money!"
> > >>
> > >>After much hemming and hawing, the bank staff finally 
> > >>ushered 
> > >>>her
> > >>into the president's office  (the customer is always 
> > >>right!).  
> > >>>The
> > >>bank
> > >>president then asked her how much she would like to
deposit.  
> > >>>She
> > >>replied, "$165,000!" and dumped the cash out of her bag
onto 
> > >>>his
> > >desk.
> > >>
> > >>The president was of course curious as to how she came by

> > >>all 
> > >>>this
> > >>cash, so he asked her, "Ma'am, I'm surprised you're
carrying 
> > >>>so=
> >  much
> > >>cash  around.  Where did you get this money?"
> > >>
> > >>The old lady replied, "I make bets."
> > >>
> > >>The president then asked, "Bets?  What kind of bets?"
> > >>
> > >>The old woman said, "Well, for example, I'll bet you
$25,000 
> > >>>that
> > >> your balls are square."
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>"Ha!" laughed the president, "That's a stupid bet. You
can 
> > >>>never
> > >>win that kind of bet!"
> > >>
> > >>The old lady challenged, "So, would you like to take my 
> > >>bet?"
> > >>
> > >>"Sure," said the president, "I'll bet $25,000 that my
balls 
> > >>>are=
> >  not
> > >square!"
> > >>
> > >>The little old lady then said, "Okay, but since there is
a 
> > >>>lot of
> > >>money
> > >>involved, may I bring my lawyer with me tomorrow at 10:00
am 
> > >>>as a
> > witness?"
> > >>
> > >>"Sure!" replied the confident president.
> > 
> > >>
> > >>That night, the president got very nervous about the bet
and 
> > >>>spent=
> >  a
> > long
> > >>time in front of a mirror checking his balls, turning
from 
> > >>>side to
> > >>>side,
> > >>again and again.  He throughly checked them out until he
was 
> > >>>sure
> > >that
> > >there
> > >>was absolutely no way his balls were square and that he 
> > >>would 
> > >>>win
> > the
> > bet.
> > >>
> > >>The next morning, at precisely 10:00 am, the little old
lady
> > appeared
> > with
> > >>her lawyer at the pres

Re: Clipboard interaction between Swing/JDK and X11

[peter . pilgrim]

 I cannot confirm it or deny it.
 
 This is quite disappointing, and I suppose it has grave consequences 
 for (forthcoming) Drag and Drop API in JFC1.2/JDK1.2
 
 Pete


__ Reply Separator _
Subject: Re: Clipboard interaction between Swing/JDK and X11
Author:  jrwatson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) at lon-mime
Date:29/10/98 14:24


the conclusion i have reached (after much agony) is that java is only 
required to support copy and paste from java to java, otherwise it is 
platform specific, and not a java problem...can someone confirm this is 
correct?
 
thanks
 
jim watson

Re: Clipboard interaction between Swing/JDK and X11

[Jean-Pierre Dube]

Hi Jim,

JDK 1.1.x will only transfers text from a JVM to the peer operating
system. In JDK 1.2 you will be able to transfers just about anything.

see: http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/javatips/jw-javatip61.html

Thanks,

-- 

--
Jean-Pierre Dubé
Infocom enr.
Developpement de logiciel
Software development


jim watson wrote:
> 
> the conclusion i have reached (after much agony) is that java is only
> required to support copy and paste from java to java, otherwise it is
> platform specific, and not a java problem...can someone confirm this is
> correct?
> 
> thanks
> 
> jim watson

JFC Compiling problems?

[sgee]

Any reason why I can run ". runnit" from the SwingSet directory, but can't
get this to compile?

import com.sun.java.swing.*;

public class test extends JFrame{

 public test(){
  this.setSize(300,300);
  this.setVisible(true);
 }//end constructor

 public static void main(String args[]){
  new test();
 }//end main

}//end class


SysVariables
JAVA_HOME="/usr/local/jdk1.1.6"
CLASSPATH="/usr/local/jdk1.1.6/lib/classes.zip:/usr/local/swing-1.0.3/swing
.jar:."
PATH=$PATH":/usr/local/jdk1.1.6/bin"

Any ideas on what happens?

[off-topic] Putting codebase in classpath, or equivalent

[Robert Dodier]

Hi there,

This is a little bit off-topic -- sorry for the intrusion. 

I am running some RMI applications on a machine which doesn't have
the necessary classes installed -- the RMI class loader runs out
and grabs the ones that are needed, using the codebase property.
That works great.

I like that so much, I wonder if I can get javac to do sort of the
same thing. What I want is to name a class in a program I am developing
on the class-less machine and somehow let javac know that I mean a
class on another machine. That would be very convenient for
development. I would really rather not mirror the class files.

javac doesn't seem to notice codebase. Is there some way I can get the
effect I want -- which is essentially to put the codebase in the
classpath, so to speak. 

I wonder if I will have to obtain the javac source and hack it to
use RMIClassloader.loadClass instead of Class.newInstance or something
like that. I guess I'm assuming that Class.newInstance ignores 
the codebase -- maybe I should hack Class.newInstance instead??


Thanks for any ideas you might have.
Robert Dodier

port plans....

[Keith T. Garner]

Hey Steve (and the rest of the porters) I hate to ask this question again,
if it was already asked once, though I didn't see it

Not that you/we have the license from Sun, are you going to just start work
on 1.2, or is a port of 1.1.7 in our future?

(I *hate* asking questions like this because it sounds like I'm being
ungrateful and wanting more and not appriciating the hard work the
porters do for us.  A co-worker asked though)

Keith, who thanks all the porters for their hard work and dedication

-- 
  Keith T. Garner   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  STR Consultant   http://www.str.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "And to all the fly Linux coders out there workin on the
   Deuce-Deuce, Peace" -- Jason Beatty

Re: [off-topic] Putting codebase in classpath, or equivalent

[Nelson Minar]

>I am running some RMI applications on a machine which doesn't have
>the necessary classes installed -- the RMI class loader runs out and
>grabs the ones that are needed, using the codebase property. That
>works great.

Yay mobile code!

>I wonder if I will have to obtain the javac source and hack it to use
>RMIClassloader.loadClass instead of Class.newInstance or something
>like that.

I think you could just build a new javac that has a different
ClassLoader. Someone might have even done this already, it's sort of
obvious. javac itself is trivial, all the real work is in
java.lang.Compiler and its friends.

One thing that's complicated, though - the Java compiler loads .java
files as well as .class files. The ClassLoader doesn't, as far as I
know. So the logic might be a bit screwy.

RE: Problems on Sparc; redhat 5.1

[Johnathan S Ra]

I've seen the same thing but haven't found the solution either.

> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Pittore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 1998 4:31 PM
> To: java-linux
> Subject: Problems on Sparc; redhat 5.1
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
>   I currently have a Sparcstation 5 running the 5.1 Redhat release.
> I tried installing the 1.1.6 JDK and when I attempt to run the
> javac compiler it just dumps core.  I tried running it with gdb but
> it seems to dump core before it even gets to main.  I suspect 
> a problem with the libraries perhaps.  I tried it with kernel
> 2.0.35 and also with glibc2.0.7-19, same problem.  I even went back
> to 1.1.5, same problem.  Has anyone else seen this and found a solution?
> 
> thanks
> bill pittore
> 
> 

Re: Java Web Server1.1 on Linux

[Joel Shellman]

I am just attempting to set up the JWS on Linux. I noticed there is
already a thread about it and so I thought I'd jump in and ask the same
question because it isn't working for me either.

I'm using Redhat 5.1.

If I try to run that diff patch, it doesn't find the file
startup_wrapper. After running the patch, running the:
cd native; make -f Makefile.lnx install

results in the error:
Makefile.lnx:45: *** missing separator.  Stop.

I did go in and do the diffs by hand on the Makefile, but then I got
errors during the make because the other diffs didn't work on the other
.c files.

Also, nearly all the Hunks fail in the patch process.

Any ideas?

Thanks,

Joel Shellman
TaoTree, Inc.
http://www.tou.com/

Re: JDK port of Linux on Digital Alpha

[Uncle George]

I suppose they are, but i dont know for sure - the folks at voicenet.com dont
tell me when i have reached the 250mb/month xfer quota. Nor do they tell me when
the web site will be  (or even if they will be ) reconnected.
There was an offer for putting the my ver of Alpha port on blackdown.org, but i
guess that didnt go anywhere ( but then again maybe not i haven't read all the
1600 emails i got for the 2 week canadian vacation to nova scotia :(  ).

So what kinda info u looking for. I will be putting up the JDK117 up soon ( prob
this weekend ) presuming that I CAN EVEN access my web pages.

gat

Dan Gilfix wrote:

> Need information related to the JDK port of Linux on Digital Alpha.  I can't
> access any of the pages on the web.
> Please help.  Thanks,
>
> Daniel Gilfix
> COMPAQ Computer Corporation
> UNIX Connectivity
> Product Management
> * 264-2317 (DTN)
> * (603) 884-2317 (Outside)
> * (603) 884-0022 (Fax)
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Newbie mySQL MkLinux and JDBC

[Douglas T. Brown]

I'm a newbie, and I'm trying to install a JDBC drivable database engine on my
MkLinux (DR3) machine.  MySQL should do the trick, and I have configured the
files without any trouble, but the compile fails.  Is there anyone out there
who has experience with this installation???

Thanks!

DTB

Problems on Sparc; redhat 5.1

[Bill Pittore]

Hi all,

  I currently have a Sparcstation 5 running the 5.1 Redhat release.
I tried installing the 1.1.6 JDK and when I attempt to run the
javac compiler it just dumps core.  I tried running it with gdb but
it seems to dump core before it even gets to main.  I suspect 
a problem with the libraries perhaps.  I tried it with kernel
2.0.35 and also with glibc2.0.7-19, same problem.  I even went back
to 1.1.5, same problem.  Has anyone else seen this and found a solution?

thanks
bill pittore

Problems on Sparc; redhat 5.1

[Bill Pittore]

Hi all,

  I currently have a Sparcstation 5 running the 5.1 Redhat release.
I tried installing the 1.1.6 JDK and when I attempt to run the
javac compiler it just dumps core.  I tried running it with gdb but
it seems to dump core before it even gets to main.  I suspect 
a problem with the libraries perhaps.  I tried it with kernel
2.0.35 and also with glibc2.0.7-19, same problem.  I even went back
to 1.1.5, same problem.  Has anyone else seen this and found a solution?

thanks
bill pittore

port plans....

[Steve Byrne]

Keith T. Garner writes:
 > Hey Steve (and the rest of the porters) I hate to ask this question again,
 > if it was already asked once, though I didn't see it
 > 
 > Not that you/we have the license from Sun, are you going to just start work
 > on 1.2, or is a port of 1.1.7 in our future?

1.1.7 is imminent.  I believe it's already available on the PowerPC platform,
and the x86 release version is probably already built by the time you read
this.  We've got a surprise with 1.1.7 that I think people will like.  I'm
going to leave it to the other team members to disclose what it is since
they've been more involved with 1.1.7 than I have, and so should get the
bragging rights :-)


 > (I *hate* asking questions like this because it sounds like I'm being
 > ungrateful and wanting more and not appriciating the hard work the
 > porters do for us.  A co-worker asked though)

No, you're definitely not being ungrateful; it's a perfectly reasonable
question.

Steve