[JBoss-dev] SeverImpl java.io.tmpdir

2003-07-04 Thread Jason Dillon
I really do not agree with this being the default behavior.  I  
generally would expect all tmp files used by JBoss to be placed into  
the server's tmp directory instead of littering the global system tmp  
directory.  If I wanted to change where tmp files are written then I  
would set the jboss.server.tmp.dir property.

It seems that the only reason why one would want to not set the  
overrideJavaTmpDir property would be if they wanted to have two tmp  
file directories... which seems to be a bit of an administrative mess,  
not to mention that it complicates the configuration.

Before you stated that an embedded JBoss might want to use a different  
tmp directory or use the system default.  This change seems to cater to  
that case, which I expect is not going to be the typical usage.  It  
would make more sense IMO to let the embedded case set  
jboss.server.tmp.dir to the appropriate location... or have a boolean  
property to force the entire system to use the system default.

So with this change, the default behavior will be for the server to  
have two tmp directories... is that what we really want?

--jason

On Friday, July 4, 2003, at 06:19  PM, Scott M Stark wrote:

  User: starksm
  Date: 03/07/04 04:19:22
  Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system/server Tag: Branch_3_2
ServerImpl.java
  Log:
  Only override the jboss.io.tmpdir if a  
jboss.server.temp.dir.overrideJavaTmpDir
  system property is specified as true, an if true, set  
jboss.io.tmpdir to the
  directory spepcified by the jboss.server.temp.dir system property  
value.

  Revision  ChangesPath
  No   revision
  No   revision

  1.25.2.14 +9 -4   
jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/system/server/ServerImpl.java

  Index: ServerImpl.java
  ===
  RCS file:  
/cvsroot/jboss/jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/system/server/ 
ServerImpl.java,v
  retrieving revision 1.25.2.13
  retrieving revision 1.25.2.14
  diff -u -r1.25.2.13 -r1.25.2.14
  --- ServerImpl.java	3 Jul 2003 14:37:45 -	1.25.2.13
  +++ ServerImpl.java	4 Jul 2003 11:19:22 -	1.25.2.14
  @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
* @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Marc Fleury/a
* @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Jason Dillon/a
* @author [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  - * @version $Revision: 1.25.2.13 $
  + * @version $Revision: 1.25.2.14 $
*/
   public class ServerImpl extends NotificationBroadcasterSupport
  implements Server, ServerImplMBean
  @@ -129,10 +129,15 @@
  {
 // Create a new config object from the give properties
 this.config = new ServerConfigImpl(props);
  -
  +
 // Set the VM temp directory to the server tmp dir
  -  System.setProperty(java.io.tmpdir,  
config.getServerTempDir().getCanonicalPath());
  -
  +  boolean overrideTmpDir =  
Boolean.getBoolean(jboss.server.temp.dir.overrideJavaTmpDir);
  +  if( overrideTmpDir )
  +  {
  + File serverTmpDir = config.getServerTempDir();
  + System.setProperty(java.io.tmpdir,  
serverTmpDir.getCanonicalPath());
  +  }
  +
 // masqurade as Server.class (cause Impl is not really  
important)
 log = Logger.getLogger(Server.class);





---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0016ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/ 
01
___
jboss-cvs-commits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-cvs-commits



---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0016ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] test suite compile error

2003-05-31 Thread Jason Dillon
Change it to org.jboss.util.NestedRuntimeException(t);

--jason

On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 01:00  PM, Rod Burgett wrote:

The testsuite code no longer seems to compile with Sun's 1.3 jdk:

 [exec]
/home/rburgett/testAtlas/planb/jboss/test/jboss-3.2/connector/src/ 
main/org/j
boss/resource/JBossResourceException.java:172: cannot resolve symbol
 [exec] symbol  : constructor RuntimeException   
(java.lang.Throwable)
 [exec] location: class java.lang.RuntimeException
 [exec]   return new RuntimeException(t);
 [exec]  ^

java.lang.RuntimeException has a ctor like this in 1.4, but not 1.3.

I thought the shift to compiling with 1.4 was restricted to jboss v4.



Rod Burgett
Senior Software Engineer
webMethods, Inc.
3930 Pender Drive
Fairfax, VA  22030  USA
Ph: 703.460.5819  (tty only)
It's all just 0s  1s -
 the trick is getting them lined up in the proper order


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming

2003-03-30 Thread Jason Dillon
Looks like Java Meets PHP with some .NET flavoring.  I like it.

--jason

On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 04:56  PM, julien viet wrote:

sorry I gave a wrong link :

 http://talks.php.net/show/php5intro

jv have a look at the new php 5 :  http://talks.php.net

jv they added : exceptions, modifiers, interfaces, abstract, 
namespaces  and more.
jv it's mono powered.

jv it seems that now they want to reach enterprise level and have
jv to get more credibility for that.
jv julien



jv ---
jv This SF.net email is sponsored by:
jv The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
jv NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
jv http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
jv ___
jv Jboss-development mailing list
jv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jv https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


--
Best regards,
 julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming

2003-03-30 Thread Jason Dillon
It is certainly possible, though it does not look like the new features 
will inhibit PHP folks from coding they way they do now.  It just looks 
like it will allow them to write better software.  I spent the past 2 
weeks writing a PHP application and over and over I wished for features 
like namespaces, exceptions and proper handling of object references.  
So the changes are welcome in my mind.  But really anything to make PHP 
less like perl and more like Java/.NET is welcome.

Though now that I think about it I would prefer that Java was more like 
PHP in the sense of a light weight web application development language 
with its rich extensions and apis.

--jason

On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 04:02  PM, julien viet wrote:

not sure they will keep php community whith them. for me
php success is settled on the fact php scripters don't have to worry
about theses kinds of things.
JD Looks like Java Meets PHP with some .NET flavoring.  I like it.

JD --jason

JD On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 04:56  PM, julien viet wrote:

sorry I gave a wrong link :

 http://talks.php.net/show/php5intro

jv have a look at the new php 5 :  http://talks.php.net

jv they added : exceptions, modifiers, interfaces, abstract,
namespaces  and more.
jv it's mono powered.
jv it seems that now they want to reach enterprise level and have
jv to get more credibility for that.
jv julien



jv ---
jv This SF.net email is sponsored by:
jv The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
jv NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
jv http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
jv ___
jv Jboss-development mailing list
jv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jv https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


--
Best regards,
 julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


JD ---
JD This SF.net email is sponsored by:
JD The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
JD NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
JD http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
JD ___
JD Jboss-development mailing list
JD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JD https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


--
Best regards,
 julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] CVS SnapShot

2003-03-13 Thread Jason Dillon
not sure how updated these babies are...

--jason

On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 02:38  PM, Kristian Köhler wrote:

Hi

there is a snapshot page at

http://jboss.sourceforge.net/snapshots/

You will find some notes at

http://www.jboss.org/developers/sourcecode.jsp

Kristian

--
Orientation in Objects GmbH
http://www.oio.de
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von
Karthik
Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. Juli 2003 08:47
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [JBoss-dev] CVS SnapShot
Hello all,
   Where can I get the JBoss CVS snapshot.
Karthik

---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] Going ahead with EJB module refactor

2003-03-12 Thread Jason Dillon
Tonight I will be working on the EJB module re-factoring.  Will 
probably have something ready to check in tomorrow.  If you have EJB 
related bits to commit in system please do so now.

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Going ahead with EJB module refactor

2003-03-12 Thread Jason Dillon
Actually now that I think about it I have to wait until i can actually 
build the source tree again...

Any word from the XDoclet folks on what the problem is?

--jason

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 03:30  PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

Tonight I will be working on the EJB module re-factoring.  Will 
probably have something ready to check in tomorrow.  If you have EJB 
related bits to commit in system please do so now.

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get 
cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance 
of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Going ahead with EJB module refactor

2003-03-12 Thread Jason Dillon
;-)

--jason

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 09:46  PM, Scott M Stark wrote:

Make sure you can actually build and test this before doing it please.


Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC

- Original Message -
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:30 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Going ahead with EJB module refactor

Tonight I will be working on the EJB module re-factoring.  Will
probably have something ready to check in tomorrow.  If you have EJB
related bits to commit in system please do so now.
--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Going ahead with EJB module refactor

2003-03-12 Thread Jason Dillon
Heh, I sorta wish I could uninstall it... perhaps I can, but I am not  
really sure how.  I will have a look unless someone beats me to it.

--jason

On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 12:15  AM, David Jencks wrote:

There's a patch on their bugtracker that is supposed to fix this:

http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/ 
ViewIssue.jspa?key=XDT-376

They want feedback.

I need to keep working so I haven't up(?)graded my 1.4.1 copy yet.

david jencks

On 2003.03.12 04:53 Jason Dillon wrote:
Actually now that I think about it I have to wait until i can actually
build the source tree again...
Any word from the XDoclet folks on what the problem is?

--jason

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 03:30  PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

Tonight I will be working on the EJB module re-factoring.  Will
probably have something ready to check in tomorrow.  If you have EJB
related bits to commit in system please do so now.
--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get
cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance
of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Going ahead with EJB module refactor

2003-03-12 Thread Jason Dillon
I was gonna try but thought I was tired and went to sleep... I was  
wrong.

--jason

On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 02:46  AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

Did it work?  I'm dead in the water as my linux box won't build either.

-dain

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 11:30 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:

Heh, I sorta wish I could uninstall it... perhaps I can, but I am not  
really sure how.  I will have a look unless someone beats me to it.

--jason

On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 12:15  AM, David Jencks wrote:

There's a patch on their bugtracker that is supposed to fix this:

http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/ 
ViewIssue.jspa?key=XDT-376

They want feedback.

I need to keep working so I haven't up(?)graded my 1.4.1 copy yet.

david jencks

On 2003.03.12 04:53 Jason Dillon wrote:
Actually now that I think about it I have to wait until i can  
actually
build the source tree again...

Any word from the XDoclet folks on what the problem is?

--jason

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 03:30  PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

Tonight I will be working on the EJB module re-factoring.  Will
probably have something ready to check in tomorrow.  If you have  
EJB
related bits to commit in system please do so now.

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get
cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the  
chance
of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!Get  
cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun andthe chance  
of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!Get  
cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun andthe chance of  
winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4.1 on OS X out and breaks build

2003-03-11 Thread Jason Dillon
FYI,

  export  
JAVA_HOME=/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/ 
Home

or if you like csh pain:

  setenv JAVA_HOME  
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/Home

And you can build again.

--jason

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 01:13  PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

I just upgraded to 1.4.1 on OS X and now the build won't work. I tried  
a fresh checkout, but that didn't help.  Jason is this working on your  
mac.

-dain

bash-2.05a$ java -version
java version 1.4.1_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1_01-39)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1_01-14, mixed mode)
bash-2.05a$ ./build.sh
build.sh: Executing: /Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/tools/bin/ant  
-logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger
Buildfile: build.xml

_buildmagic:init:
Trying to override old definition of task property
_buildmagic:init:local-properties:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to /Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/build
configure-project:
 [echo] groups:  default
 [echo] modules:  
common,naming,remoting,jmx,system,aop,cache,j2ee,management,transaction 
,persistence,server,blocks,console,security,messaging,connector,varia,c 
luster,jetty,jboss.net,iiop

_buildmagic:modules:most:

 ==
 ==
 ==  Executing 'most' in module 'common'...
 ==
 ==
compile-mbean-sources:
[mkdir] Created dir:  
/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/common/output/gen/classes
[execmodules] Running mbeaninterface/
[execmodules] Generating output for  
'org.jboss.util.property.jmx.SystemPropertyClassValue' using template  
file  
'jar:file:/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/thirdparty/xdoclet- 
xdoclet/lib/xdoclet-jmx-module-jb4.jar!/xdoclet/modules/jmx/resources/ 
mbean.xdt'.
[execmodules] (XDocletMain.start   51  ) Running  
XDoclet failed.
[execmodules] (XDocletMain.start   52  ) Running  
XDoclet failed.
[execmodules] xdoclet.template.TemplateException: Error in template  
file: corresponding /XDtClass:classOf not found, line=8 of template  
file:  
jar:file:/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/thirdparty/xdoclet- 
xdoclet/lib/xdoclet-jmx-module-jb4.jar!/xdoclet/modules/jmx/resources/ 
mbean.xdt
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.handleBlockTag(TemplateEngine.java:824)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.handleTag(TemplateEngine.java:425)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.generate(TemplateEngine.java:324)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.start(TemplateEngine.java:373)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.TemplateSubTask.startEngine(TemplateSubTask.java:559)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.TemplateSubTask.generateForClass(TemplateSubTask.java:765)
And so on...



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4.1 on OS X out and breaks build

2003-03-11 Thread Jason Dillon
Looks like 1.4.1 breaks more than XDoclet :-(  Eclipse does not like it  
so much either.  Looks like jEdit is a tad happier than it was with the  
preview release, but it still functions better with 1.3.1 (no  
corruption on screen elements, like the dockling prefs and such).  On  
the other hand IDEA seems to work lots better with the final... display  
was a complete mess with the pr.

I am gonna give Eclipse another 10 minutes to start and then I am gonna  
kill it and force it to use 1.3.1... at least it will work slow as it  
may be.  :-(

--jason

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 01:13  PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

I just upgraded to 1.4.1 on OS X and now the build won't work. I tried  
a fresh checkout, but that didn't help.  Jason is this working on your  
mac.

-dain

bash-2.05a$ java -version
java version 1.4.1_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1_01-39)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1_01-14, mixed mode)
bash-2.05a$ ./build.sh
build.sh: Executing: /Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/tools/bin/ant  
-logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger
Buildfile: build.xml

_buildmagic:init:
Trying to override old definition of task property
_buildmagic:init:local-properties:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to /Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/build
configure-project:
 [echo] groups:  default
 [echo] modules:  
common,naming,remoting,jmx,system,aop,cache,j2ee,management,transaction 
,persistence,server,blocks,console,security,messaging,connector,varia,c 
luster,jetty,jboss.net,iiop

_buildmagic:modules:most:

 ==
 ==
 ==  Executing 'most' in module 'common'...
 ==
 ==
compile-mbean-sources:
[mkdir] Created dir:  
/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/common/output/gen/classes
[execmodules] Running mbeaninterface/
[execmodules] Generating output for  
'org.jboss.util.property.jmx.SystemPropertyClassValue' using template  
file  
'jar:file:/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/thirdparty/xdoclet- 
xdoclet/lib/xdoclet-jmx-module-jb4.jar!/xdoclet/modules/jmx/resources/ 
mbean.xdt'.
[execmodules] (XDocletMain.start   51  ) Running  
XDoclet failed.
[execmodules] (XDocletMain.start   52  ) Running  
XDoclet failed.
[execmodules] xdoclet.template.TemplateException: Error in template  
file: corresponding /XDtClass:classOf not found, line=8 of template  
file:  
jar:file:/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/thirdparty/xdoclet- 
xdoclet/lib/xdoclet-jmx-module-jb4.jar!/xdoclet/modules/jmx/resources/ 
mbean.xdt
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.handleBlockTag(TemplateEngine.java:824)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.handleTag(TemplateEngine.java:425)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.generate(TemplateEngine.java:324)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.start(TemplateEngine.java:373)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.TemplateSubTask.startEngine(TemplateSubTask.java:559)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.TemplateSubTask.generateForClass(TemplateSubTask.java:765)
And so on...



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4.1 on OS X out and breaks build

2003-03-11 Thread Jason Dillon
Eclipse decided to start behaving just after I wrote that mail... go  
figure.

--jason

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 01:13  PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

I just upgraded to 1.4.1 on OS X and now the build won't work. I tried  
a fresh checkout, but that didn't help.  Jason is this working on your  
mac.

-dain

bash-2.05a$ java -version
java version 1.4.1_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1_01-39)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1_01-14, mixed mode)
bash-2.05a$ ./build.sh
build.sh: Executing: /Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/tools/bin/ant  
-logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger
Buildfile: build.xml

_buildmagic:init:
Trying to override old definition of task property
_buildmagic:init:local-properties:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to /Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/build
configure-project:
 [echo] groups:  default
 [echo] modules:  
common,naming,remoting,jmx,system,aop,cache,j2ee,management,transaction 
,persistence,server,blocks,console,security,messaging,connector,varia,c 
luster,jetty,jboss.net,iiop

_buildmagic:modules:most:

 ==
 ==
 ==  Executing 'most' in module 'common'...
 ==
 ==
compile-mbean-sources:
[mkdir] Created dir:  
/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/common/output/gen/classes
[execmodules] Running mbeaninterface/
[execmodules] Generating output for  
'org.jboss.util.property.jmx.SystemPropertyClassValue' using template  
file  
'jar:file:/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/thirdparty/xdoclet- 
xdoclet/lib/xdoclet-jmx-module-jb4.jar!/xdoclet/modules/jmx/resources/ 
mbean.xdt'.
[execmodules] (XDocletMain.start   51  ) Running  
XDoclet failed.
[execmodules] (XDocletMain.start   52  ) Running  
XDoclet failed.
[execmodules] xdoclet.template.TemplateException: Error in template  
file: corresponding /XDtClass:classOf not found, line=8 of template  
file:  
jar:file:/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/thirdparty/xdoclet- 
xdoclet/lib/xdoclet-jmx-module-jb4.jar!/xdoclet/modules/jmx/resources/ 
mbean.xdt
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.handleBlockTag(TemplateEngine.java:824)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.handleTag(TemplateEngine.java:425)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.generate(TemplateEngine.java:324)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.start(TemplateEngine.java:373)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.TemplateSubTask.startEngine(TemplateSubTask.java:559)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.TemplateSubTask.generateForClass(TemplateSubTask.java:765)
And so on...



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4.1 on OS X out and breaks build

2003-03-11 Thread Jason Dillon
Um but it looks like HEAD will only build with 1.4+ so I will shut up  
now.

--jason

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 06:19  PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

FYI,

  export  
JAVA_HOME=/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/ 
Home

or if you like csh pain:

  setenv JAVA_HOME  
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/Home

And you can build again.

--jason

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 01:13  PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

I just upgraded to 1.4.1 on OS X and now the build won't work. I  
tried a fresh checkout, but that didn't help.  Jason is this working  
on your mac.

-dain

bash-2.05a$ java -version
java version 1.4.1_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1_01-39)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1_01-14, mixed mode)
bash-2.05a$ ./build.sh
build.sh: Executing:  
/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/tools/bin/ant -logger  
org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger
Buildfile: build.xml

_buildmagic:init:
Trying to override old definition of task property
_buildmagic:init:local-properties:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to  
/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/build

configure-project:
 [echo] groups:  default
 [echo] modules:  
common,naming,remoting,jmx,system,aop,cache,j2ee,management,transactio 
n,persistence,server,blocks,console,security,messaging,connector,varia 
,cluster,jetty,jboss.net,iiop

_buildmagic:modules:most:

 ==
 ==
 ==  Executing 'most' in module 'common'...
 ==
 ==
compile-mbean-sources:
[mkdir] Created dir:  
/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/common/output/gen/classes
[execmodules] Running mbeaninterface/
[execmodules] Generating output for  
'org.jboss.util.property.jmx.SystemPropertyClassValue' using template  
file  
'jar:file:/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/thirdparty/xdoclet- 
xdoclet/lib/xdoclet-jmx-module-jb4.jar!/xdoclet/modules/jmx/ 
resources/mbean.xdt'.
[execmodules] (XDocletMain.start   51  ) Running  
XDoclet failed.
[execmodules] (XDocletMain.start   52  ) Running  
XDoclet failed.
[execmodules] xdoclet.template.TemplateException: Error in template  
file: corresponding /XDtClass:classOf not found, line=8 of template  
file:  
jar:file:/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/thirdparty/xdoclet- 
xdoclet/lib/xdoclet-jmx-module-jb4.jar!/xdoclet/modules/jmx/ 
resources/mbean.xdt
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.handleBlockTag(TemplateEngine.java:824 
)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.handleTag(TemplateEngine.java:425)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.generate(TemplateEngine.java:324)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.start(TemplateEngine.java:373)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.TemplateSubTask.startEngine(TemplateSubTask.java:559)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.TemplateSubTask.generateForClass(TemplateSubTask.java:765)
And so on...



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] Anyone looked at dependency-manager task?

2003-03-10 Thread Jason Dillon
Just curious if anyone has had time to look at the dependency-manager 
task usage in the buildmagic-2.0 tree?

If not could I get a few peeps to have a look and give me some feedback 
on how well it works to download depends to build this project?

 cvs get -r buildmagic-2_0 buildmagic
 cd buildmagic
 ./build/build.sh
Sanka,

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4.1 on OS X out and breaks build

2003-03-10 Thread Jason Dillon
I am currently using 1.4.1 p10.  I will download the latest ASAP.

--jason

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 01:13 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

I just upgraded to 1.4.1 on OS X and now the build won't work. I tried  
a fresh checkout, but that didn't help.  Jason is this working on your  
mac.

-dain

bash-2.05a$ java -version
java version 1.4.1_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1_01-39)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1_01-14, mixed mode)
bash-2.05a$ ./build.sh
build.sh: Executing: /Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/tools/bin/ant  
-logger org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger
Buildfile: build.xml

_buildmagic:init:
Trying to override old definition of task property
_buildmagic:init:local-properties:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to /Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/build
configure-project:
 [echo] groups:  default
 [echo] modules:  
common,naming,remoting,jmx,system,aop,cache,j2ee,management,transaction 
,persistence,server,blocks,console,security,messaging,connector,varia,c 
luster,jetty,jboss.net,iiop

_buildmagic:modules:most:

 ==
 ==
 ==  Executing 'most' in module 'common'...
 ==
 ==
compile-mbean-sources:
[mkdir] Created dir:  
/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/common/output/gen/classes
[execmodules] Running mbeaninterface/
[execmodules] Generating output for  
'org.jboss.util.property.jmx.SystemPropertyClassValue' using template  
file  
'jar:file:/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/thirdparty/xdoclet- 
xdoclet/lib/xdoclet-jmx-module-jb4.jar!/xdoclet/modules/jmx/resources/ 
mbean.xdt'.
[execmodules] (XDocletMain.start   51  ) Running  
XDoclet failed.
[execmodules] (XDocletMain.start   52  ) Running  
XDoclet failed.
[execmodules] xdoclet.template.TemplateException: Error in template  
file: corresponding /XDtClass:classOf not found, line=8 of template  
file:  
jar:file:/Users/dain/work/jboss/x/jboss-head/thirdparty/xdoclet- 
xdoclet/lib/xdoclet-jmx-module-jb4.jar!/xdoclet/modules/jmx/resources/ 
mbean.xdt
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.handleBlockTag(TemplateEngine.java:824)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.handleTag(TemplateEngine.java:425)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.generate(TemplateEngine.java:324)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.template.TemplateEngine.start(TemplateEngine.java:373)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.TemplateSubTask.startEngine(TemplateSubTask.java:559)
[execmodules]   at  
xdoclet.TemplateSubTask.generateForClass(TemplateSubTask.java:765)
And so on...



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Move MarshalledValue* to common module?

2003-03-10 Thread Jason Dillon
Why not add it to system?

--jason

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 09:32 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

I have another issue now...  should have checked before sending this 
email.

I have a written new basic service ObjectCopier, which is an MBean 
that knows how to *efficiently* deep copy objects.  This means that I 
track metadata so we can avoid serialize/ deserialize.  Anyway, I 
wanted add this to the common module, because it is a generic service 
that will be used by several modules (CMP and Cache for now).  The 
problem is common does not build after system, so I can't use 
ServiceMBeanSupport.  Should we add a new module for common services 
or move the ServiceMBeanSupport stuff to common or something else or 
should I put my code server?

-dain

On Monday, March 10, 2003, at 08:15 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

I would like to move the org.jboss.invocation.MarshalledValue* to the 
commons package, so it can be used by non-ejb dependent code.  Does 
any have an issue with this?  Does this create a problem for client 
jars?

-dain



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Move MarshalledValue* to common module?

2003-03-10 Thread Jason Dillon
What is up with the unified interception framework?  I assume this will 
be part of it yes?

--jason

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 02:14 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

I don't need to move it anymore, because I'm going to put my new code 
in server.  I think this will need to be moved when we get more of the 
persistence engine moved, because we use MarshalledValue for BLOBs.

-dain

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 12:57 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:

Why not add it to system?

--jason

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 09:32 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

I have another issue now...  should have checked before sending this 
email.

I have a written new basic service ObjectCopier, which is an MBean 
that knows how to *efficiently* deep copy objects.  This means that 
I track metadata so we can avoid serialize/ deserialize.  Anyway, I 
wanted add this to the common module, because it is a generic 
service that will be used by several modules (CMP and Cache for 
now).  The problem is common does not build after system, so I can't 
use ServiceMBeanSupport.  Should we add a new module for common 
services or move the ServiceMBeanSupport stuff to common or 
something else or should I put my code server?

-dain

On Monday, March 10, 2003, at 08:15 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

I would like to move the org.jboss.invocation.MarshalledValue* to 
the commons package, so it can be used by non-ejb dependent code.  
Does any have an issue with this?  Does this create a problem for 
client jars?

-dain



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Naming a core module?

2003-03-09 Thread Jason Dillon
What is remoting for?  What bits of it does jxm depend on?

--jason

On Sunday, March 9, 2003, at 02:02 PM, Tom Elrod wrote:

I agree that it doesn't make sense to have naming in core.  Actually 
noted
this in the e-mail I sent out when I made the commit.

However, don't have a solution off-hand for how we can include modules 
and
jars in remoting (and yet exclude the from core, without removing 
remoting,
which jmx now depends on).  This will probably become more of problem 
as the
list of these such things continues to grow, since more and more 
protocols
(JMS, IIOP, etc.) and detectors (JINI, SLP, etc.) will be added over 
time.
Already includes SOAP and JNDI, which really don't belong in core.

Best suggestion I can give is to remove remoting from core, create yet
another sub module for jmx remoting which will depend on remoting and 
jmx
(thus leaving jmx in core without needing remoting).  As you can see, 
this
makes things much more complex in regards to development, building, and
deploying (which is pretty complex to begin with).  Just have to weigh 
the
trade-offs.

Whatever the preference, I will be on vacation next week so won't be 
able to
do anything with it till I get back.

-Tom


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jason
Dillon
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Naming a core module?
This is fine until the naming service is rewritten and starts to make
use of functionality from system or other core modules.  Best
to avoid
these sorts of complications.
--jason

On Sunday, March 9, 2003, at 04:19 AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Tom did this the other day when he integrated the JNDI detector into
remoting, but just for source build dependencies only.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Naming a core module?
When did naming become a core module?  Appears that a remoting test
depends upon it.  Is this what we really want?  The core is now
dependent on naming to build... naming is a service, not part of the
core system.  Any way we can fix this so the dependencies are not
whack?
--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way.
Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way.
Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available
on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse with HEAD and 3.2 opened at same time?

2003-03-09 Thread Jason Dillon
Starting two instances is a pain in the ass on OS X :-(

--jason

On Sunday, March 9, 2003, at 08:51 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:

What do you want to do? Won't two Eclipse instances do?

-Original Message-
From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 5:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse with HEAD and 3.2 opened at same time?
Does anyone one if it is possible to get eclipse two have JBoss HEAD
and JBoss 3.2 opened at the same time?
--jason


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] Forum watches re-enabled

2003-03-09 Thread Jason Dillon
I fixed the problem which was preventing email from being sent out, so 
your watches should work again.

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars

2003-03-08 Thread Jason Dillon
It should be moved to the proper location in the build/output tree then.

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 05:52 AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Obviously not, since it boots w/o it. ;)  It threw me off since it was
in lib/ I just expected that to be the case.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 5:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars
Is jboss-cache required to boot the server?

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 05:21 AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Because bela's jboss-cache is in lib/ on the build, but not configured

in Main.  So, I had to chase that down a bit before looking at the
source.
Thus, I was wondering why not just take everything in lib/*

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars
I have no exp. with WebDav so I can not say... but do we want to force

the usage of Webdav?  I personally do not like to force anything.  Why

the concern?

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 05:02 AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Ok, this makes sense ..

can't we list even if remote using WebDav?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars
The jars which are hardcoded in Main are references to jars which are

required to load up the server.  We can not assume that those jars
are

on the local file system and thus can not query a directory to
discover which jars need to be loaded.
If you would rather not have them hardcoded then perhaps an external
property file would work.  We certainly do not want to be bound to
the

file system again.

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 03:40  AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Is there any reason we need to hardcode the jars that are included
in

the lib directory? (in org.jboss.Main)

Can't we just put all the *.jars under root/lib into the class
loader on boot?
Jeff



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way.
Available on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way.
Available on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com

[JBoss-dev] Dependency manager buildmagic project

2003-03-08 Thread Jason Dillon
I just finished my initial attempt at adding Maven/Greebo-like  
dependency management to the Buildmagic project (branch  
buildmagic-2_0).  Currently it is only used to grab deps for use inside  
of library.classpath, but can easily be  used to grab tool dependencies  
too (except for the core).  This is a short-term solution to some of  
our build system problems until Maven or something is ready for us to  
use.

I would like to know if some of you can check her out and give it a  
whirl... especially someone on win32.

It works very similar to Greebo... well it was greebo until I got my  
hands on it.  There is a task inside of the configure target which does  
all of the work.  Note that there are some issues with it and the  
clean/clobber targets which I have fixed yet.  Anyways, the task looks  
like:

!-- Configure thirdparty libraries --
dependency-manager
cacheDir=${project.thirdparty.cache}
metadataFile=${module.output}/dependencies.metadata
dependencyFile=${module.root}/dependencies.xml
offline=${dependency-manager.offline}
pathID=library.classpath
repository url=http://jboss.sf.net/buildmagic/thirdparty;  
type=jboss/
/dependency-manager

By default project.thirdparty.cache is set to  
${project.root}/thirdparty-cache.  Some of the mods to Greebo include  
the ability to work offline, automatic generation of the classpath and  
some semi-intelligent attempts to speed up the process once files have  
already been downloaded.

I setup only the required libraries under  
http://jboss.sf.net/buildmagic/thirdparty.  The structure of the files  
contained here are a mix of the thirdparty directory style from JBoss  
HEAD and Maven.  The structure is identical in the cache directory.   
The major differences between JBoss HEAD and this is the addition of  
version information to the file names.

Anyways, the first time you run a build you will see something like  
this:

snip
...
[dependency-manager] Created dir:  
/Users/jason/ws/jboss/buildmagic-2.0/thirdparty-cache
[dependency-manager] Verifying 7 dependencies...
[dependency-manager]  1) Downloaded log4j-1.2.4.jar from:  
http://jboss.sf.net/buildmagic/thirdparty/
[dependency-manager]  2) Downloaded webdavlib-1.0.16.jar from:  
http://jboss.sf.net/buildmagic/thirdparty/
[dependency-manager]  3) Downloaded commons-httpclient-1.0.16.jar from:  
http://jboss.sf.net/buildmagic/thirdparty/
[dependency-manager]  4) Downloaded junit-3.7.jar from:  
http://jboss.sf.net/buildmagic/thirdparty/
[dependency-manager]  5) Downloaded regexp-1.0.8.jar from:  
http://jboss.sf.net/buildmagic/thirdparty/
[dependency-manager]  6) Downloaded jmx-1.0ri.jar from:  
http://jboss.sf.net/buildmagic/thirdparty/
[dependency-manager]  7) Downloaded dom4j-1.3.jar from:  
http://jboss.sf.net/buildmagic/thirdparty/
...
/snip

After the files have been downloaded you will either see:

snip
...
configure:
[dependency-manager] Verifying 7 dependencies...
[dependency-manager]  1) log4j-1.2.4.jar is up-to-date
[dependency-manager]  2) webdavlib-1.0.16.jar is up-to-date
[dependency-manager]  3) commons-httpclient-1.0.16.jar is up-to-date
[dependency-manager]  4) junit-3.7.jar is up-to-date
[dependency-manager]  5) regexp-1.0.8.jar is up-to-date
[dependency-manager]  6) jmx-1.0ri.jar is up-to-date
[dependency-manager]  7) dom4j-1.3.jar is up-to-date
[dependency-manager] Creating  
/Users/jason/ws/jboss/buildmagic-2.0/common/output/dependencies.metadata
...
/snip

or:

snip
...
[dependency-manager] Dependencies are up-to-date (metadata check).
...
/snip
The latter is some of the semi-intelligence I added to avoid hitting  
the repository webserver when we are fairly sure that we have the right  
files.  This is done via an internal uptodate task which checks to see  
if the build or dependency files are newer than the metadata file  
(output/dependencies.metadata by default).  If they are, then deps  
might have changed so we do a check.  If they have not then we check to  
see if the files we depend on exist.  If they don't we have to check.   
Else we just skip all of that.  Note that this will cause problems when  
jars are updated on the remote server but the version number was not  
changed.  To make it do a check, just nuke the metadata file.

As I mentioned before, this task will generate an Ant path with the id  
given by pathID.  This makes it integrate very nicely into the current  
systems framework (or chaos depending on how you look at it).

Lastly I added a flag to allow the build system to function even if  
there is no network connection.  This will only work if your  
thirdparty-cache directory contains the correct bits though... not much  
I can do about that.  If you set -Ddependency-manager.offline=true,  
then when doing dependency verification, only files will be retrieved  
from local repositories (protocol is 'file').  If the protocol is  
anything else then only a simple check is done to see if the 

[JBoss-dev] Naming a core module?

2003-03-08 Thread Jason Dillon
When did naming become a core module?  Appears that a remoting test 
depends upon it.  Is this what we really want?  The core is now 
dependent on naming to build... naming is a service, not part of the 
core system.  Any way we can fix this so the dependencies are not whack?

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Naming a core module?

2003-03-08 Thread Jason Dillon
This is fine until the naming service is rewritten and starts to make 
use of functionality from system or other core modules.  Best to avoid 
these sorts of complications.

--jason

On Sunday, March 9, 2003, at 04:19 AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Tom did this the other day when he integrated the JNDI detector into
remoting, but just for source build dependencies only.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Naming a core module?
When did naming become a core module?  Appears that a remoting test
depends upon it.  Is this what we really want?  The core is now
dependent on naming to build... naming is a service, not part of the
core system.  Any way we can fix this so the dependencies are not 
whack?

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] Eclipse with HEAD and 3.2 opened at same time?

2003-03-08 Thread Jason Dillon
Does anyone one if it is possible to get eclipse two have JBoss HEAD 
and JBoss 3.2 opened at the same time?

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Dillon
Enjoy.

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Dillon
Why?  Like I said before server is the kitchen-sink and I personally 
would like to see that module go away, once all of the fluff it 
contains finds a proper home.  Just my opinion of course...

--jason

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 11:15  PM, Bill Burke wrote:

CMP specific stuff should remain in server/ Shouldn't it?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jeremy Boynes
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
Thanks - I will start moving stuff over

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
Enjoy.

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available
on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView,
The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on
major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Dillon
EJB bits to ejb module ;)

--jason

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 11:28  PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

The EJB part yes, the generic persistence stuff no.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
CMP specific stuff should remain in server/ Shouldn't it?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jeremy Boynes
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
Thanks - I will start moving stuff over

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
Enjoy.

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available
on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way.
Available on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available
on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Dillon
Huh?  When what?  SOrry for being dense I am just confused as to the 
exact bits you are talking about.

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 12:02  AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

OK. When ? Are we stable yet?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
EJB bits to ejb module ;)

--jason

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 11:28  PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

The EJB part yes, the generic persistence stuff no.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Bill Burke
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
CMP specific stuff should remain in server/ Shouldn't it?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of
Jeremy Boynes
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
Thanks - I will start moving stuff over

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
Enjoy.

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can
leave you
feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you
find your way.
Available on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find
your way.
Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free.
www.etnus.com ___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available
on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way.
Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available
on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Dillon
Great ;-)  I will handle the EJB move once the interception changes 
have been made.

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 12:35  AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

I am going to move the generic peristence stuff from server to
persistence.
I am going to leave the EJB persistence stuff in server for now as I am
not sure where Bill is with the interceptor changes. It can move to ejb
along with the rest (whenever whoever does that, just not me right now
:-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 9:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
Huh?  When what?  SOrry for being dense I am just confused as to the
exact bits you are talking about.
--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 12:02  AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

OK. When ? Are we stable yet?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
EJB bits to ejb module ;)

--jason

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 11:28  PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

The EJB part yes, the generic persistence stuff no.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Bill Burke
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
CMP specific stuff should remain in server/ Shouldn't it?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of
Jeremy Boynes
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
Thanks - I will start moving stuff over

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
Enjoy.

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can
leave you
feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you
find your way.
Available on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can
leave you
feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find
your way.
Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free.
www.etnus.com ___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can
leave you
feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you
find your way.
Available on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way.
Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available
on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way.
Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Re: [JBoss-dev] DTD hell

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Dillon
Use XML Schema.

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 12:50  AM, Scott M Stark wrote:

I am working on adding the ability to specify a loader repository to  
all
of the deployment types, and this adds a loader-repository element that
needs a mixed content type with a loader-repository-config element with
an ANY content type. This is needed because the  
loader-repository-config
depends on the particular loader-repository class implementation.

The problem is that if I add the following to the existing deployment  
dtds
they become non-validatible because any elements that show up in an
ANY content model element still must be declared, and this is the part
that makes no sense to me. Is there a way to avoid this?

!-- The loader-repository specifies the name of the  
UnifiedLoaderRepository
   MBean to use for the ear to provide ear level scoping of classes  
deployed
   in the ear. It is a unique JMX ObjectName string.

Examples:

loader-repositoryjboss.test:loader=cts-cmp2v1-sar.ear/loader- 
repository

   loader-repository
  jboss.test:loader=cts-cmp2v1-sar.ear
  loader-repository-config
 HeirarchicalLoaderRepository3 java2ParentDelegaton='true' /
  /loader-repository-config
   /loader-repository
--
!ELEMENT loader-repository (#PCDATA | loader-repository-config)*
!-- The loaderRepositoryClass attribute gives the classname  
loader-repository
implementation.
--
!ATTLIST loader-repository loaderRepositoryClass CDATA #IMPLIED

!-- The loader-repository-config element specifies any arbitrary  
configuration
fragment for use in configuring the loader-repository instance. The  
actual
content of this element is specific to the loaderRepositoryClass and  
the
code parsing the element.
--
!ELEMENT loader-repository-config (ANY)


Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC

---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The  
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost  
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major  
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] How to check if JBoss startup is finished

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Dillon
ServerImpl should probably send notifications when it does any 
life-cycle changes.  Should not be too difficult to implement, though I 
have never really played with JMX notifications much.  Do you have any 
suggestions on how to go about adding that?  I mean specifically about 
Notification classes and type naming and such.

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 12:56  AM, Scott M Stark wrote:

There is no way currently. The server impl which registers as the 
jboss.system:type=Server
mbean needs to send a notification on the completion of its startup to 
signal this. This
is the point at which the JBoss (MX MicroKernel) ... Started in ... 
line is printed.


Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC

- Original Message -
From: Hans Dockter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:17 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] How to check if JBoss startup is finished

At the moment JBoss-IDE detects only whether JBoss has been
started or not. I'd like to distinguish between 'is starting' and
'startup finished'. What's the best way to do this ?
Hans



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Dillon
Can we just make it official right now that HEAD is 1.4 only?

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 01:36  AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

So when can I start to check in code into HEAD that will only build 
1.4?

What parts of the server must run on 1.3?

After spending an entire day writing a lame IdentityHashMap (and I 
haven't even begun to test it) I am leaning to requiring 1.4 for the 
new persistence framework.  I think David's DTM logging and recovery 
stuff will require NIO in 1.4.

-dain

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 01:12 AM, Scott M Stark wrote:

Agreed. I don't want that management headache propagated to 4.0.


Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC

- Original Message -
From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

I got no problem making 99% of CMP working on 1.3 (basicially 
anything
that does not require JDBC3). It is just the #ifdef stuff I hate.

-dain


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you 
feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. 
Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free.  www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Dillon
The jars which are hardcoded in Main are references to jars which are 
required to load up the server.  We can not assume that those jars are 
on the local file system and thus can not query a directory to discover 
which jars need to be loaded.

If you would rather not have them hardcoded then perhaps an external 
property file would work.  We certainly do not want to be bound to the 
file system again.

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 03:40  AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Is there any reason we need to hardcode the jars that are included in
the lib directory? (in org.jboss.Main)
Can't we just put all the *.jars under root/lib into the class loader
on boot?
Jeff



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Dillon
I have no exp. with WebDav so I can not say... but do we want to force 
the usage of Webdav?  I personally do not like to force anything.  Why 
the concern?

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 05:02 AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Ok, this makes sense ..

can't we list even if remote using WebDav?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars
The jars which are hardcoded in Main are references to jars which are
required to load up the server.  We can not assume that those jars are
on the local file system and thus can not query a directory to discover
which jars need to be loaded.
If you would rather not have them hardcoded then perhaps an external
property file would work.  We certainly do not want to be bound to the
file system again.
--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 03:40  AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Is there any reason we need to hardcode the jars that are included in
the lib directory? (in org.jboss.Main)
Can't we just put all the *.jars under root/lib into the class
loader on boot?
Jeff



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Dillon
Okay I should clarify, least the flames arise, that when it comes to 
flexibility of the system I do not want to make any assumptions about 
how it will be used.

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 05:02 AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Ok, this makes sense ..

can't we list even if remote using WebDav?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars
The jars which are hardcoded in Main are references to jars which are
required to load up the server.  We can not assume that those jars are
on the local file system and thus can not query a directory to discover
which jars need to be loaded.
If you would rather not have them hardcoded then perhaps an external
property file would work.  We certainly do not want to be bound to the
file system again.
--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 03:40  AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Is there any reason we need to hardcode the jars that are included in
the lib directory? (in org.jboss.Main)
Can't we just put all the *.jars under root/lib into the class
loader on boot?
Jeff



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars

2003-03-07 Thread Jason Dillon
Is jboss-cache required to boot the server?

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 05:21 AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Because bela's jboss-cache is in lib/ on the build, but not configured
in Main.  So, I had to chase that down a bit before looking at the
source.
Thus, I was wondering why not just take everything in lib/*

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars
I have no exp. with WebDav so I can not say... but do we want to force
the usage of Webdav?  I personally do not like to force anything.  Why
the concern?
--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 05:02 AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Ok, this makes sense ..

can't we list even if remote using WebDav?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars
The jars which are hardcoded in Main are references to jars which are
required to load up the server.  We can not assume that those jars are

on the local file system and thus can not query a directory to
discover which jars need to be loaded.
If you would rather not have them hardcoded then perhaps an external
property file would work.  We certainly do not want to be bound to the

file system again.

--jason

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 03:40  AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

Is there any reason we need to hardcode the jars that are included in

the lib directory? (in org.jboss.Main)

Can't we just put all the *.jars under root/lib into the class
loader on boot?
Jeff



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you
feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Is JDK 1.4 required to build

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Dillon
+1 to required JDK 1.4 for HEAD

--jason

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 12:59  AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

Is JDK 1.4 now required to build?  If not when are we going to add 
this requirement?

I need an IdentityHashMap for the ObjectCopier and would like to 
encapsulate and delegate to IdentityHashMap for JDK 1.4 (because of 
speed) and for JDK 1.3 I will just is an IdentityKey wrapper.  This 
code will be way easier to write if I can assume that we are compiling 
in 1.4.

For now I will just write the 1.3 version.

-dain

---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you 
feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. 
Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free.  www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] Unified interceptors?

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Dillon
Any idea when this will become reality for HEAD?  The spaghetti 
interceptor model is making the separation of EJB bits from the server 
module very hairy if not impossible.

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Unified interceptors?

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Dillon
I am chill... are you?

--jason

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 02:26  AM, Bill Burke wrote:

then don't do it and chillThis split is not very important.  I am
working on it Monday.  I'm doing benchmarks the next 2 days.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of 
Jason
Dillon
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Unified interceptors?

Any idea when this will become reality for HEAD?  The spaghetti
interceptor model is making the separation of EJB bits from the server
module very hairy if not impossible.
--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView,
The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on
major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Unified interceptors?

2003-03-06 Thread Jason Dillon
Well it is still possible to separate the two w/o unified interceptors. 
 Not including the bits from org.jboss.cmp (this stuff is very 
independent) there are about 150+ classes which are not directly 
dependent on the bits from org.jboss.ejb (and related).

Some bits are forced to remain in jboss/ejb when they logically do not 
belong there because of the dependence on 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractInterceptor.  Also I am not really sure 
that the webapp stuff really belongs in the ejb module, but there is 
too much interaction with the org.jboss.metadata classes to pull them 
apart with out changes to the core meta data framework.

What is left over is:

  org.jboss.cmp (I am guessing this is some of the new cmp framework)
  org.jboss.proxy (the core proxy compiler bits, could move to common)
  org.jboss.aspect (not sure what this is doing here)
  org.jboss.cache (not sure what this is doing here)
  org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCUtil (required by org.jboss.cmp, 
does not depend on org.jboss.ejb)
  org.jboss.invocation (the invocation framework)
  org.jboss.jms (jms provider abstraction layer  asf fluff)
  org.jboss.jmx (legacy adapters, connectors and whatever... should go 
away or move to jmx?)
  org.jboss.logging (default log4j logging service)
  org.jboss.metadata.XmlLoadable (the only class which was not EJB/J2EE 
specific)
  org.jboss.naming (naming proto handlers, default service  helpers)
  org.jboss.security (jboss security interfaces, minus interceptors 
which depend on org.jboss.ejb)
  org.jboss.Shutdown (depends on the jmx fluff and should move to 
system once jmx/remote stuff is cleaned up)

Does anyone know if any of the above is obsolete and can be removed?

I still believe that making the EJB-specific components of JBoss 
separate from the core system  services is a very, very good idea.  It 
will help keep JBoss a generic framework by forcing developers to keep 
service and system classes and components separate.  It will also help 
promote the fact that JBoss is not just an EJB container, or rather 
isn't an EJB container at all... just a generic framework which happens 
to also provide EJB/J2EE services.

I feel that for the most part, the rest of the server is quite well 
organized into logical chunks of functionality.  It is just this module 
which is the kitchen sink which has been bothering me for quite some 
time.  I do not believe it is just a style issue either.  Separation of 
functionality makes for better software engineering by isolation of 
similar components, which promotes simpler builds as well as unit and 
integration testing.

So, I think we should make the change, but I think it will be best to 
wait until the unified interceptor work has been completed.  Hopefully 
that will be done by middle of next week, after which I can redo this 
separation, now that I have discovered all of the interaction points.  
Once that has been completed and proves functional via the testsuite I 
think we should move the cmp2 bits to its own home.

Comments?

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] please notify before large scale changes to EJB land.

2003-03-05 Thread Jason Dillon
Any preferences on when the changes should be made as to not interfere 
with your work?  I guess it will take about a day to make the change.  
How long will it take you to complete the interception changes?

--jason

On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 07:00  AM, Bill Burke wrote:

I'm begging people not to do any large scale changes to EJB land.  I'm 
about
to undertake converting all the EJB interceptors and invokers to use 
the AOP
Invocation object and Interceptor interface.  This my first step on
integrating the AOP DP framework.

I'm asking you to please notify me before attempting any large scale 
changes
like moving server/ to ejb/ module because I may lose hours/days of 
work if
you don't.

Thanks,

Bill



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] please notify before large scale changes to EJB land.

2003-03-05 Thread Jason Dillon
Nightly build?  I have never been maintaining that, short of build 
system support.  As for the rest of the build system fluff I am looking 
into several possible solutions to resolve many of the problems which 
currently exist.

The EJB stuff has been on my list of stuff todo since I separated the 
system module from server.  I never got around to it due to the size 
and impact of the changes.  I still think that it should be done, as 
the separation helps keep JBoss a generic architecture by forcing 
people to keep dependencies in order.  It also makes the build system 
easier to maintain wrt module outputs and such.

+1 for ejb move... eventually when it does not fuck anything up.

--jason

On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 08:47  PM, Bill Burke wrote:

I really don't understand why you need to move stuff out of server/ 
anyways.
This is mostly EJB anyways.  Why not just rename the server/ module to 
EJB?
I really don't see any gain in this cosmetic shit except wasting 
everybody's
time trying to figure out where everything is again and screwing with 
people
that are currently working on that code.  Shouldn't you rather be 
putting
your efforts in fixing the nightly build?  Or improving buildmagic?  
Instead
of this cosmetic bullshit?(BTW, I see that building is much faster now.
Thank you!)

BUT, if you really insist, either Thursday and Friday, or end of next 
week
for the ejb/ module changes.

Bill


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of 
Jason
Dillon
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 5:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] please notify before large scale changes to 
EJB
land.

Any preferences on when the changes should be made as to not interfere
with your work?  I guess it will take about a day to make the change.
How long will it take you to complete the interception changes?
--jason

On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 07:00  AM, Bill Burke wrote:

I'm begging people not to do any large scale changes to EJB land.  
I'm
about
to undertake converting all the EJB interceptors and invokers to use
the AOP
Invocation object and Interceptor interface.  This my first step on
integrating the AOP DP framework.

I'm asking you to please notify me before attempting any large scale
changes
like moving server/ to ejb/ module because I may lose hours/days of
work if
you don't.
Thanks,

Bill



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] please notify before large scale changes to EJB land.

2003-03-05 Thread Jason Dillon
I just quickly scanned the packages in server and it looks like quite a 
bit is non-ejb specific.

There is just too much mingling between core system components and EJB 
fluff.  JBoss will be better off with these nice and cleanly separated. 
 JBoss... more than just and EJB container.

Not EJB specific:

./org/jboss/aspect
./org/jboss/aspect/interceptors
./org/jboss/aspect/internal
./org/jboss/aspect/jmx
./org/jboss/aspect/spi
./org/jboss/cache
./org/jboss/cache/invalidation
./org/jboss/cache/invalidation/bridges
./org/jboss/cache/invalidation/triggers
./org/jboss/cmp
./org/jboss/cmp/aop
./org/jboss/cmp/query
./org/jboss/cmp/schema
./org/jboss/cmp/sql
./org/jboss/cmp/sql/jdbc
./org/jboss/invocation
./org/jboss/invocation/http
./org/jboss/invocation/http/interfaces
./org/jboss/invocation/http/server
./org/jboss/invocation/jrmp
./org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/interfaces
./org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/server
./org/jboss/invocation/local
./org/jboss/invocation/nrmi
./org/jboss/invocation/nrmi/algorithm
./org/jboss/invocation/pooled
./org/jboss/invocation/pooled/interfaces
./org/jboss/invocation/pooled/server
./org/jboss/invocation/trunk
./org/jboss/invocation/trunk/client
./org/jboss/invocation/trunk/client/bio
./org/jboss/invocation/trunk/client/nbio
./org/jboss/invocation/trunk/server
./org/jboss/invocation/trunk/server/bio
./org/jboss/invocation/trunk/server/nbio
./org/jboss/jms
./org/jboss/jms/asf
./org/jboss/jms/jndi
./org/jboss/jmx
./org/jboss/jmx/adaptor
./org/jboss/jmx/adaptor/rmi
./org/jboss/jmx/adaptor/xml
./org/jboss/jmx/connector
./org/jboss/jmx/connector/notification
./org/jboss/jmx/connector/rmi
./org/jboss/jmx/service
./org/jboss/logging
./org/jboss/naming
./org/jboss/naming/java
./org/jboss/proxy
./org/jboss/proxy/compiler
./org/jboss/verifier
./org/jboss/verifier/event
./org/jboss/verifier/factory
./org/jboss/web
EJB specific:

./org/jboss/security ?
./org/jboss/security/plugins ?
./org/jboss/monitor ?
./org/jboss/monitor/client ?
./org/jboss/verifier/strategy ?
./org/jboss/jmx/adaptor/ejb
./org/jboss/jmx/connector/ejb
./org/jboss/metadata
./org/jboss/proxy/ejb
./org/jboss/proxy/ejb/handle
./org/jboss/cmp/ejb
./org/jboss/cmp/ejb/ejbql
./org/jboss/deployment
./org/jboss/ejb
./org/jboss/ejb/entity
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/bridge
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/ejbql
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/bridge
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/hsqldb
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/informix
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/jdbc3
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/metadata
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/mysql
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/sybase
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/bmp
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/jdbc
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/metadata
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jms
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/keygenerator
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/keygenerator/uuid
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/local
./org/jboss/ejb/plugins/lock
./org/jboss/ejb/timer
--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] please notify before large scale changes to EJB land.

2003-03-05 Thread Jason Dillon
Repackaging of the EJB bits which are not under org.jboss.ejb is minor 
IMO, but making the module separation is important for build 
simplification and general logical separation of server components.

I think stink it is worth the effort.

--jason

On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 09:33  AM, Scott M Stark wrote:

This is this list of packages under server that really are ejb specific
and not already under org/jboss/ejb:
./org/jboss/monitor ?
./org/jboss/monitor/client ?
./org/jboss/verifier/strategy ?
./org/jboss/jmx/adaptor/ejb
./org/jboss/jmx/connector/ejb
./org/jboss/proxy/ejb
./org/jboss/proxy/ejb/handle
./org/jboss/cmp/ejb
./org/jboss/cmp/ejb/ejbql
Its really not much so I don't really see its worth the effort to 
rename. Especially
given that a lot of this is obsolete or soon will be.


Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC

- Original Message -
From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] please notify before large scale changes to 
EJB land.


On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 11:56 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:

EJB specific:

./org/jboss/security ?
./org/jboss/security/plugins ?
./org/jboss/monitor ?
./org/jboss/monitor/client ?
./org/jboss/verifier/strategy ?
./org/jboss/jmx/adaptor/ejb
./org/jboss/jmx/connector/ejb
./org/jboss/metadata
./org/jboss/proxy/ejb
./org/jboss/proxy/ejb/handle
./org/jboss/cmp/ejb
./org/jboss/cmp/ejb/ejbql
./org/jboss/deployment
If the above stuff is truly EJB specific I think we should put them
under the org.jboss.ejb package.  If it is not then, we should move
them to their respective modules (we will move the cmp stuff).  I 
think
we need a clear delineation between EJB specific stuff and general
behaviors that can be reused by other distributed object frameworks
like AOP.

How does everyone feel about that?

-dain


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-03-04 Thread Jason Dillon
Why not do a full checkout each day always?

--jason

On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 02:56  PM, Chris Kimpton wrote:

Hi,

--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think so, the error is not shown.

I built fresh from a clean checkout last night with no problems.
The
problem may be that Chris is not doing a clean checkout every day.
There is a link on the page to request a full checkout - which I have
done - so we can see if that resolves it.
The compile runs on linux - although I do some stuff to ensure a
specific jdk is used and maybe bypassing any jvm memory changes that
have been made - when was this done?
Regards,
Chris
=

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The 
debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost 
and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major 
UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] .cvsroot replaced by CVSROOT/cvsignore

2003-03-04 Thread Jason Dillon
I just added CVSROOT/cvsignore to the repository for global ignores.  
If something needs to be ignored globally added it here, else use a 
local .cvsroot.

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] XDoclet libraries.ent change

2003-03-04 Thread Jason Dillon
I changed the XDoclet config in libraries.ent to default to 
thirdparty/xdoclet-xdoclet/lib, which allows other projects to continue 
to function.  If you want to use the bits from jboss/xdoclet define 
xdoclet.xdoclet.lib in your build/local.properties.

I still have not figured out how this ever worked... nothing ever 
seemed to get built in my jboss/xdoclet module and it is not hooked up 
to the project build anywhere.

I have tested that jboss-head will build with this default 
configuration and now so does the buildmagic project.

We really need a better mechanism to handle these dependencies, for 
both tools and compile requirements.

I am starting to think that buildmagic should be renamed to 
buildheadache... :-(

Also, I removed the nonsense about single-module fluff... the exact 
same thing can be done by simply using -Dmodules=some-module (not 
-Dmodule mind ya, that won't do what you expect at all).

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?

2003-03-03 Thread Jason Dillon
When I was cleaning up stuff, creation of system module and related 
work, I was planning on moving all of the EJB specific bits to 
jboss/ejb, which is why I created the module.  It will probably take a 
day or so to make the move and test it.  I can take a stab at it and 
let ya know.  The persistence stuff can either be done before or after. 
 Is all of that rooted in one place?  If so I can take a stab at moving 
that over at the same time.

--jason

On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:32  PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

I was just thinking about this the other day...

I like just persistence and I would love to have the EJB related stuff 
moved to an EJB module.  I'd also like to get rid of the 
org.jboss.ejb.plugins as it is just a junk drawer.

-dain

On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 12:07 AM, Alex Loubyansky wrote:

Sunday, March 02, 2003, 9:15:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
JD I think it might be better to use a different name non-ejb 
related...
JD but whatever... what about just persistence?

I like just persistence too.

alex

JD --jason

JD On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:45  AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

I think so.

Is 'cmp' OK for the new module name, or is that too strongly 
associated
with EJBs? Maybe 'persistence'?

Jeremy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?
Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its
own module since it is  not particularly dependent on ejbs?
Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty
ejb module?
david jencks




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] NetBoot PetStore?

2003-03-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Whatever happened to the NetBoot PetStore work?

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Maven rumour

2003-03-03 Thread Jason Dillon
I am looking into using Maven for JBoss... nothing more, nothing less.

Comments on your experience would be helpful though... :-)

--jason

On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 02:01  AM, Luke Taylor wrote:

Someone pointed out a post today on the Maven-dev list which said that 
JBoss wants to move to Maven. Is there any truth in this and if so, 
any idea of how the move is going to be made? I've been looking at 
Maven a bit recently and my guess is that the move might not be 
entirely painless.



--
 Luke Taylor.  Monkey Machine Ltd.
 PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523Chttp://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] WTF happened to XDoclet tool config?!

2003-03-02 Thread Jason Dillon
I would like to eliminate the buildmagic tasks too.  Right now I am 
looking into using Maven to replace it all.  If I get something running 
with Maven I will try to add an XDoclet module as a depend to allow 
other projects to use the built tasks... not sure how well that will 
work just yet though.

Unfortunately the changes made broke other projects (like buildmagic, 
though I believe that project is hosed in other ways too).

Lastly I am not sure that we really want to pull xdoclet from its cvs 
each build.  Can you provide me with more details as to what we want to 
achieve please.

Thanks,

--jason

On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 08:09  PM, David Jencks wrote:

Well, I hope you can fix this Jason because I couldn't, and I'm about 
98%
sure the problems lie in the buildmagic extensions being incompatible 
with
current versions of ant.

We have a long term  goal of moving the jboss related xdoclet support 
to
jboss cvs.

I attempted to start this and to make constructing an appropriate 
xdoclet
version for use in the jboss build an automated process by building 
xdoclet
in the jboss build process.  Thus, the xdoclet module attempts to check
xdoclet out of xdoclet cvs and build it.

So far so good, but it is impossible to build the rest of jboss using 
the
just built xdoclet.  For a while I was able to build by trying twice, 
the
second attempt succeeded, but this did not seem to work reliably. The
really odd thing was that the parts that could not be found had just 
been
used for one or two module builds! After struggling for a week or so I 
gave
up and made a simple mechanism to check the results of the xdoclet 
build
into cvs thirdparty.

BTW having xdoclet in tools/lib will obviously not work if xdoclet is 
built
as part of the jboss build.  In general I believe ant recommends not
putting jars in tools/lib but defining your tasks using an explicit
classpath.

The build failures seemed to occur mostly because some part that had 
been
compiled earlier in the build process were not available later in the 
build
process.

I just found another possibly similar example of this behavior that is
possibly more serious.  On a clean checkout, executing the main build
module tests target will not build very many modules before stopping, 
being
unable to find a module it just built.  Running ./build.sh, then 
./build.sh
tests seems to work.  (The build tests target builds each module, runs
module-level unit tests, and finally starts jboss and runs the 
testsuite.
The output from module level unit tests is included in the test 
reports.)

My feeling after struggling with these problems is that the buildmagic
build organization is the best part of the jboss build system, but 
that we
should try to eliminate the buildmagic tasks if at all possible in 
favor of
standard ant.  I don't think anyone here wants to spend their time 
working
on ant tasks.  Ant demonstrated a long time ago that they do not 
preserve
backward compatibility with external tasks, and we demonstrated that we
don't keep up. (originally build/build.sh clean main worked, but it 
stopped
working a really long time ago: the order of the modules is confused 
in the
main target).

Thanks
david jencks
On 2003.03.02 03:43 Jason Dillon wrote:
What happened to the XDoclet tool configuration?  I don't get it... we
went from simply including the required jars in tools/lib (IMO the way
it should be) to including it from thirdparty (which has just been a
pain) and now there is some jboss-xdoclet pseudo module which does who
knows what.
So what is the deal?  This has complicated the already over 
complicated
build system.

Can someone please explain the reasoning behind this.  I am sure there
was a good reason, but I am even more sure that there is a less
intrusive and simpler way to go about getting the same effect.
--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] ClassWorlds?

2003-03-02 Thread Jason Dillon
Just curious if the class-loading experts have looked at ClassWorlds:

  http://classworlds.werken.com/

I wonder if we could make use of this as part of the UCL loading 
system... ?

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] WTF happened to XDoclet tool config?!

2003-03-02 Thread Jason Dillon
The primary overall goal is to move the xdoclet jboss module into jboss
cvs.  A secondary goal is to be able to  build a jboss specific 
version of
xdoclet core, since changes to the jboss-specific stuff have often 
required
bugfixes or implementation of missing functionality to  xdoclet core.  
I
started with  the secondary goal.  The build system is set up so that
xdoclet will only be built once unless you manually delete some tag 
files
(last.xdoclet.update and last.xdoclet.build)
I see.  I would rather not end up with another jboss/jetty module where 
we track XDoclet sources.  Instead I would like to see us import a 
released source archive (or non-released I don't really care) then 
applying patches to that base and use it to compile.  I think this will 
be easier to maintain and will also promote getting the changes back to 
the XDoclet folks in a manageable fashion for them.  I do not know how 
well that would work, but it sounds reasonable at the moment.


I know Maven has some kind of repository idea.  Is there some way we 
can
combine this with our need to use unreleased builds of e.g. xdoclet?
Hrm... not too sure what you are thinking.  We could setup a 
JBoss-specific remote repo and place JBoss specific XDoclet builds 
there, but that is really no different than importing such a jar into 
the current CVS-based thirdparty mechanism.  From what I grasp so far, 
the Maven repo is to allow projects to use external libs with out 
having to setup a repository of there own (like we do).  That is one 
issue I have with Maven actually, but it can be gotten around by either 
continuing to use a CVS repository which conforms to their repository 
structure or by providing a JBoss remote Maven repo on our SF website.

The repository mechanism in general is a good one, but I think the 
Maven impl is a little lacking.  One good thing that it does is force a 
structure, as well as provide simple access and organization for 
multiple library versions.

Either way I am starting to understand more for what you need.  I 
expect we will eventually end up with more of these cases as JBoss 
expands to use more external software.  As I mentioned before the Jetty 
stuff is already similar to this, but IMO unmanageable.

I am going to have to twist my brain into thinking about build systems 
in a completely new fashion to keep from going mad...

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?

2003-03-02 Thread Jason Dillon
I hope so to both...

--jason

On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:09  AM, David Jencks wrote:

Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its own module
since it is  not particularly dependent on ejbs?
Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty ejb 
module?

david jencks

---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?

2003-03-02 Thread Jason Dillon
I think it might be better to use a different name non-ejb related... 
but whatever... what about just persistence?

--jason

On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:45  AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

I think so.

Is 'cmp' OK for the new module name, or is that too strongly associated
with EJBs? Maybe 'persistence'?
Jeremy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] New module for cmp? What about the ejb module?
Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its
own module since it is  not particularly dependent on ejbs?
Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty
ejb module?
david jencks

---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] Build system speed improvements

2003-03-01 Thread Jason Dillon
I just committed a tiny change to the build system which allows a 
module to bypass the compile/output phase when the module has already 
been built and is up to date.

It works using the uptodate task and checking the ${module.source} 
tree, module build files and project build files against a build marker 
(output/build-marker) which is created/touched at the end of the output 
generation target.

I am seeing a 5x speed increase when rebuilding an already built 
project (30s vs 2m 30s) .  Normally this will never happen, but it will 
still speed up project builds when only one or two modules change.

If you want to turn this functionality off you can set 
build-bypass.disabled=true on the command line or in local.properties.

Lastly I only updated the build.xml files for modules which are part of 
the default build.  Feel free to update the other modules as needed.  
Something similar might make the testsuite much easier to run over and 
over... who knows.

As always I tested this on my machine, but shit happens... to me... a 
lot.  If this totally breaks your build please let me know.  I do not 
think it will, it is small and uses standard Ant.

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development

2003-02-28 Thread Jason Dillon
We already have nested throwables (org.jboss.util.Nested*) that function in JDK 1.3  1.4, just use them.

--jason


On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 09:18  PM, Bill Burke wrote:

We're not going to have .jpp or other ant switches just so that people can use nested exceptions

-Original Message-
From: Matt Munz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matt Munz
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development

Bill,
 
  I thought JBoss was going to support 1.4.  Is this not the case?
 
  - Matt

-Original Message-
From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 2/28/2003 8:42 AM
To: Jboss-Dev
Cc:
Subject: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development

There have been a lot of build breakages lately because people are using JDK
1.4 features and they break in JDK 1.3 builds.  WE STILL SUPPORT JDK 1.3.
My suggestion?  Stop developing JBOss with jdk 1.4 and develop with 1.3.

Please stop the sloppiness.

Bill



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

winmail.dat>

Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development

2003-02-28 Thread Jason Dillon
Any automated build and reporting system would be valuable... just 
depends on the implementation as to whether it is useful or not.

--jason

On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 10:36  PM, David Jencks wrote:

On 2003.02.28 10:23 Jeff Haynie wrote:
The problem really is with me - I fess up. Bill's mad because I broke
the build twice this week by inadvertantly checking in code (throwing 
an
exception that is the new overloaded version in 1.4) that only 
compiles
on 1.4.   Unfortunately, my whole work and home environment *DO* 
require
1.4 and only works under 1.4 - so I sometimes forget to re-set my path
to JDK1.3 when I compile.  So, it compiles fine under 1.4.  I'm 
changing
my jboss build environment to force my path and JDK to 1.3 before it
runs.  Maybe be can update the build.bat/.sh to automatically do this
(or at least check the version before you compile) and that would fix
this problem for everyone?
I don't think this is viable, since some features are simply going to 
be
supported only on jdk 1.4.  The primary example is working/reasonable
transaction logging: I think non-blocking sockets versions of transport
will be another example.

I really think a reliable warning service is the way to go.  I found 
Chris
Kimpton's compilation reports so unreliable I stopped paying attention 
to
them a long time ago.  Are they useful to anyone?

david


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Jencks
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] stop using JDK 1.4 for development
I'd prefer to have a reliable way to report these problems, since I
don't consider it realistic for me to develop on 1.3.1.  How do you
detect them?
For the particular problem of nested exceptions, I think we should
always use the jboss NestedThrowable stuff Jason wrote since it 
provides
a much more reasonable stack trace.  Dain and I made as much as we 
could
find of the jca and jta frameworks use this with good results. How 
could
we make this better known and popularize it?

thanks
david jencks
On 2003.02.28 08:42 Bill Burke wrote:
There have been a lot of build breakages lately because people are
using JDK 1.4 features and they break in JDK 1.3 builds.  WE STILL
SUPPORT JDK 1.3. My suggestion?  Stop developing JBOss with jdk 1.4
and develop with 1.3.
Please stop the sloppiness.

Bill



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf 
___
Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 and JDK 1.4.1 discussion

2003-02-28 Thread Jason Dillon
Assertions could also help debug server problems and generally improve 
the quality of the code too.  1.4 is good, just too bad not everyone 
has it yet.  Still waiting for a final for Mac OS X :(

--jason

On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 01:08  PM, Ricardo Argüello wrote:

I was planning to use the new non-blocking I/O API for JBoss Media.
I'm already using the new Java Image I/O available only in 1.4 and 
above.

So it's not only a nested exceptions problem...

Ricardo Argüello

- Original Message -
From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 7:28 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 and JDK 1.4.1 discussion

I hope we're not going to have pre-compile directives everywhere just 
so
that people can use nested Runtime, Remote, and regular Exceptions.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of 
Scott
M Stark
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 6:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 and JDK 1.4.1 discussion

I have had a few developers ask that 1.4.1 be required for
compiling 4.0 to simplify the
use of 1.4.1 features while still supporting JDK 1.3.1 for
runtime for features backward
compatible with 3.2. That seems like a reasonable comprimise
given that 4.0 is a
major release. The challenge is how to segment the testsuite into
the unit tests that
are required to run under a 1.3.1 VM.

Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC

---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
force it to use ant to do all compiles?  Seems like
that would be best
to solve most problems.
I've been able to get it to run our ant build files
directly.  You might have to go into the eclipse
properties and add all the tools/lib/*.jar files to
the ANT runtime classpath.
Do you know if there is an _easy_ way to make all projects use a set of 
external tools builder configs?

I found with a small mod to tools/etc/build*/tools.ent that adding a 
external builder to execute the build.xml before the eclipse compiler 
will allow the entire server to be built from inside of eclipse.  Only 
one extra step is needed to call build/build.xml to make the 
distribution directory so that the server will run... which could be 
worked around as well with an additional builder to trigger the build 
module to pull.

BTW I did not have to add anything the ANT runtime classpath.

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing sincesliced bread

2003-02-26 Thread Jason Dillon
IMO interceptors are much simpilar than hard coded invokers.

--jason


On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Bill Burke wrote:

 What I'm saying is, why add this complication?  Do we really need it?  KISS.
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hiram
 Chirino
   Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:23 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing since
 sliced bread
 
 
   How about implementing some kind of seperate interceptor framwork around
 the client side and server side invocation layers??
 
   David, if yoiu had a configurable way to plug in your tx interceptors at
 the invocation layer you would be ok right?  I think david just needs to
 avoid duplicating the code that is in the trunk invoker all over the place.
 
   Bill, how doable is that?
 
   Regards,
   Hiram
 
Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 IMHO, CORE client interceptors such as security and tx should be written
 such that if the client doesn't support interceptors (C++) you don't
 break
 the server side or put additional configuration requirements on the
 server
 side.
 
 
 Bill
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --
   Do you Yahoo!?
   Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more
 



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Jason Dillon
Any reason not to set it up as multiple projects?  I have had nothing 
but success when connecting Eclipse projects to a checked out 
jboss-head.

--jason

On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:42  AM, Nathan Phelps wrote:

While we're on the subject of Eclipse...

Can anyone give me some tips for working with the JBoss source in
Eclipse via the built-in extssh client?  I can get it all checked out,
but then it gets very confused about the package names.  It tries to do
j2ee.src.main.org.jboss.j2ee, messaging.src.main.org.jboss.mq, etc.  I
guess it wants individual projects for each directory?
I was hoping to set it up as a SINGLE project so I can just check out
the source and start working.  I read the The Developing JBoss using
Eclipse HOWTO, but it only explores setting it up as multiple 
projects.
This question is echoed on the forums as well at
http://www.jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=162thread=28822.

Up to now I've been using NetBeans, but I'd really like to get this up
and running on Eclipse with the JBoss IDE plug-in and all if possible.
Thanks,

Nathan



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Jason Dillon
Ahh, but have you tried Eclipse?

--jason

On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:02  AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

vim

-dain

On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 12:43 PM, Jeff Haynie wrote:

If you like Eclipse, IntelliJ blows it away.  It's not free, but cheap
and much more mature than Eclipse.  I used Eclipse, but enjoy IntelliJ
much more. (Not trying to start a holy war, just giving you another
option to look at it you enjoy Eclipse...)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hiram Chirino
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...


+1 I use it all them time.  The Refactoring support
and the Quick Assist features rock.
Regards,
Hiram
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can not believe how fast, intelligent and
functional this little IDE.
  I have tears in my eyes I am so pleased.  Okay
perhaps I need to get
out more... but still.  I think I am going to have
to say goodbye to
XEmacs.  Perhaps I am just getting old and lazy...
--jason




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for
Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students
receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun,
Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
___
Jboss-development mailing list 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't
afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get
hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
___
Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Jason Dillon
I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory, 
cause the exact location under build/output will change from version to 
version.

Is there any way to make Eclipse create jars?  Or any way to make it 
conditionally compile stuff for 1.3 and others for 1.4? Or a way to 
force it to use ant to do all compiles?  Seems like that would be best 
to solve most problems.

So far I am pretty happy, but it is by no means perfect.

--jason

On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 03:42  AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:

I've tried it various ways.. lately I've been doing
the following:
- compile source code manualy.
- adjust eclipse build path by: adding the source
folders of sub projects that I will be working with as
source folders.  (the default is no good)
- adjust eclipse build path by: adding all the jars in
the build/output/jboss*/lib and
build/output/jboss*/client and
build/output/jboss*/server/all/lib directories to the
project classpath.
Regards,
Hiram
--- Nathan Phelps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we're on the subject of Eclipse...

Can anyone give me some tips for working with the
JBoss source in
Eclipse via the built-in extssh client?  I can get
it all checked out,
but then it gets very confused about the package
names.  It tries to do
j2ee.src.main.org.jboss.j2ee,
messaging.src.main.org.jboss.mq, etc.  I
guess it wants individual projects for each
directory?
I was hoping to set it up as a SINGLE project so I
can just check out
the source and start working.  I read the The
Developing JBoss using
Eclipse HOWTO, but it only explores setting it up
as multiple projects.
This question is echoed on the forums as well at
http://www.jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=162thread=28822.
Up to now I've been using NetBeans, but I'd really
like to get this up
and running on Eclipse with the JBoss IDE plug-in
and all if possible.
Thanks,

Nathan




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for
Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students
receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun,
Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...

2003-02-26 Thread Jason Dillon
I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory,
cause the exact location under build/output will change from version 
to
version.
What build/output will change from version to version?
The directory name under build/output changes when the version 
number/tag changes.


Is there any way to make Eclipse create jars?
Go under the file menu to export.  Choose jar file and follow the 
wizard.
Automatically is what I meant.


Or any way to make it conditionally compile stuff for 1.3 and others 
for
1.4?

Right click on a project and go to properties.  Select Java Compiler 
on the
left.  If you click on the Use project settings radio button then 
you can
set any custom compiler options you want including setting the compiler
compliance level (1.3 or 1.4).
On a per package or per class level, there are several bits of select 
packages which will only compile under 1.4, but I do not want to force 
the entire project to use one or the other.  I was hoping for a bit 
more intelligence for supporting multiple jdk versions concurrently.


Or a way to force it to use ant to do all compiles?
Right click on your project and go to properties again.  Click on 
External
Tools Builders.  Click on the New... button and select Ant Build.  On 
the
build options tab you can specify if you want to have this run for Full
builds, Incremental builds, and/or Auto builds.
I will play with this, as it may just solve the above problems.

Thanks,

--jason



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies!
Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships.
Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more.
www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the best thing sincesliced bread

2003-02-25 Thread Jason Dillon
Interceptors seem reasonable, as long as there are no hidden costs behind 
them.  Why not keep them seperated and more flexible?  Also allows 
invokers to become a little bit simpler.  The only down (aside from any 
performance  client-side class loading issues) are the read code as a 
story fluff which some of us have been pimping from day one.  So that 
really isn't a down after all since I never bought into that garbage in 
the first place ;)

So are there any performance or other negative side effects which would be 
undesirable by making this seperation?  If not, then the more flexible and 
pluggable the better I say.  But then again what do I know, I haven't 
touched a bit of code in months :(  Only evil servers to deal with...

--jason



On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, David 
Jencks wrote:

 On 2003.02.25 02:58 Sacha Labourey wrote:
  Hello,
  
  This discussion is somehow strange because, and I agree with David: you
  don't seem to be speaking about the same thing at the same time...
  Asynchronous argumentation is hard to follow...
  
   - I think we should have interceptors
   - Yes, but the sky is blue
   - No! Invokers can't handle DTM in this case
   - You mean AOP?
  
  I understand David's point of view. David loves orthogonal designs and
  the
  idea to have somehow symetric interceptors (between the client and the
  server), possibly with a null invoker in the middle of the chain makes
  his
  design pleaseant. Nevertheless, where I think I agree with Bill is that
  we
  first have to check if we don't go too far just for the beauty of it.
  Let's
  take IIOP as an example. In the general case, IIOP can only transport the
  same kind of data:
   - invocations information (method name, arguments, etc.)
   - arbitrary context information
  
  In the arbitrary payload, you may find security information, transaction
  information, etc. The question is: at the end of the day, do we really
  need
  a stack of interceptors just to extract this set of information and
  populate
  a JBoss invocation object? Couldn’t we more simply just extract all this
  stuff and put it in the Invocation Object (and the server side Invoker
  could do that).
  
  I agree, it would look much smarter to have this separation of concern
  and
  have each interceptor from a virtual-client-stack (i.e. client side
  interceptors living on the server and mimic-ing client-side behaviour)
  put
  only what is needed inside the JBoss invocation object. NEVERTHELESS, as
  this information will always be similar, why not simply do that in a
  generic
  way inside the invoker: in-mass population of the invocation with
  well-known
  key names for well-known invocation content.
  
  If you think about it, the invoker already does that: it extracts the
  target
  MBean ObjectName from the invocation and push the invocation to it: if
  you
  push your reasoning far enough, that's already a concern that shouldn't
  be
  put in a pure transport-focused invoker. But I agree, and as French
  say:
  Je pousse mémé dans les ortilles. Translation left as an exercise.
 
 well, aside from my and babelfish's inability to translate that...
 
 1. I was planning to move the invocation reassembly and targeting into a
 bunch of interceptors on the server side.
 
 2. I think your argument applies with exactly equal force to the client
 side interceptors and if we put the functionality for IIOP into the invoker
 on the server side we should for exactly the same reason eliminate client
 side interceptors everywhere and put them in the client side of more
 capable (than IIOP) invokers.  Just because we haven't used the client
 interceptors for any customization doesn't mean they aren't a good idea. 
 If we ever found a use for including additional context information, we
 would be able to include it in all transports simply be writing one client
 and one server interceptor and adding it to the chains for the objects we
 wanted it for.  For IIOP, I think this would result in the fewest changes:
 I think basically we'd just have to add the C++ (or whatever) code to send
 the additional context info.
 
 thanks
 david
 
 
  
  Cheers,
  
  
  Sacha
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
   Behalf Of David Jencks
   Sent: lundi, 24. février 2003 21:02
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the 
   best thing since sliced bread
   
   
   On 2003.02.24 14:35 Bill Burke wrote:



 Bill, what I find really boring and unpleasant about this 
   discussion is
 that I can't find any evidence that you read most of my 
   posts, or that
you

Ditto.

I thought I did read your stuff and replied appropriately.  Maybe I
missed
something.  What I saw you propose for non-Java and I'll quote you:

outside world  something corba and proxy-like  ci1  
   ci2  some kind
of
invoker-like thing  si1  si2 

RE: [JBoss-dev] MDB tests in HEAD

2003-02-23 Thread Jason Dillon
Did this mail just make it to the list ?  Ouch...

--jason


On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, marc fleury wrote:

 he is bck
 
 marcf
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
  Behalf Of Jason Dillon
  Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:05 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [JBoss-dev] MDB tests in HEAD
  
  
  I am porting the changes I made to 3.0 back to HEAD 
  (DLQHandler uses JMSProviderAdapter to attach to resources).  
  After merging those changes I noticed that the MDB tests were 
  very, very noisy. but reported no errors or failures.  I 
  doubled checked a clean copy of HEAD and it performs the same 
  when running:
  
  ./testsuite/build.sh one-test -Dnojars=t 
  -Dtest=org.jboss.test.mdb.test.MDBUnitTestCase
  
  I am seeing lots of ERROR and WARNs related to XA sessions:
  
  2002-07-10 17:52:38,740 ERROR [org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession]
  failed to commit/rollback
  javax.transaction.xa.XAException
  at org.jboss.mq.SpyXAResource.commit(SpyXAResource.java:105)
  at
  org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession.onMessage(StdServerSession.
  java:289)
  at 
  org.jboss.mq.SpyMessageConsumer.sessionConsumerProcessMessage(
  SpyMessage
  Consumer.java:561)
  at
  org.jboss.mq.SpyMessageConsumer.addMessage(SpyMessageConsumer.
  java:377)
  at org.jboss.mq.SpySession.run(SpySession.java:252)
  at
  org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession.run(StdServerSession.java:177)
  at 
  EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(Poo
  ledExecuto
  r.java:642)
  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
  
  .
  
  2002-07-10 17:52:42,606 WARN  [org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule] 
  XAException: tx=XidImpl [FormatId=257, 
  GlobalId=sanity.planet57.com//1536,
  BranchQual=] errorCode=XAER_RMERR javax.transaction.xa.XAException
  at org.jboss.mq.SpyXAResource.commit(SpyXAResource.java:105)
  at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.commitResources(TxCapsule.java:1651)
  at org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule.commit(TxCapsule.java:361)
  at 
  org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl.commit(TransactionImpl.java:73)
  at
  org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession.onMessage(StdServerSession.
  java:319)
  at 
  org.jboss.mq.SpyMessageConsumer.sessionConsumerProcessMessage(
  SpyMessage
  Consumer.java:561)
  at
  org.jboss.mq.SpyMessageConsumer.addMessage(SpyMessageConsumer.
  java:377)
  at org.jboss.mq.SpySession.run(SpySession.java:252)
  at
  org.jboss.jms.asf.StdServerSession.run(StdServerSession.java:177)
  at 
  EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(Poo
  ledExecuto
  r.java:642)
  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
  
  * * *
  
  Are these errors normal?  Or is the MDB sub-system unhappy?
  
  --jason
  
  
  
  ---
  This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
  Two, two, TWO treats in one.
  http://thinkgeek.com/sf 
  ___
  Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
  
 
 
 
 ---
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
 The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
 Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
 www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
 ___
 Jboss-development mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
 



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] New thirdparty module

2002-12-13 Thread Jason Dillon
This seems to need a fresh checkout to get the new module - does 
anyone know
another way?

cd jboss-head/thirdparty
cvs get _thirdparty_apache_slide

---jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for changes to URL deployment to clean up netboot

2002-12-07 Thread Jason Dillon
Wanted to get feedback before starting to implement...


;)



The current support for loading deployment units has several special 
cases
to deal with loading from the network e.g. in
SARDeployer.parseXMLClasspath(), NetBootHelper.getDefaultListUrl() or 
even
HttpURLDeploymentScanner itself.

Specifically what are the special cases?  It has been a while since I 
looked, refresh my memory.  Some work still needs to be done to remove 
all of the http: specific bits are replace them with plain 
URLConnnection bits.


I would like to make changes to simplify this and at the same time 
offer
additional flexibility.

The main change would be to factor out the URL listing functionality 
into
helpers with a factory to create them based on the scheme. Examples 
would
be:
* file: using java.io.File as now
* http(s): using DAV
* http: using the current listing mechanisms (if still applicable)
others could be added as needed (e.g ftp:)

Explain some of the details here.



The DAV client would allow JBoss to be netbooted from any web server
supporting DAV, either directly (e.g. Tomcat 4.1, Apache+mod_dav or 
even
IIS) or via a helper servlet (which could read either the content of 
its war
or config of its host).

I am all about more network proto support.  Can this be abstracted into 
a URL Handler  used with a URLConnection?


This change would isolate the SARDeployer and the 
URLDeploymentScanner's
from the different URL schemes and remove the special cases.

Again, explain some details please.

=]

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] Hong Kong training

2002-11-27 Thread Jason Dillon
You should really have a Thailand training too... =]

--jason


On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 09:05  AM, marc fleury wrote:


Guys,

the training in January 14-17th in Hong Kong.  We lowered the price to
$2000 for early registration and it is the only training I am 
personally
doing in Q12003.  Can't get better than that.

The early bird price is until Dec 15th so start early.

see you in HK

marcf

xx
Marc Fleury, Ph.D.
President, Founder
JBoss Group, LLC
xx



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
handheld. Power  Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T 
handheld. Power  Color in a compact size! 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] where to post correction to jboss 3.0.4 adm. and devel. Second Edition?

2002-11-26 Thread Jason Dillon
Post a patch on sf.net

--jason


On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 01:21  PM, Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI 
Serviços wrote:

where should I post correction to jboss 3.0.4 adm. and devel.  Second 
Edition?

by this list?
by bug at source forge?


--

| Emerson Cargnin  |
| Analista de Sistemas Sr. |
| Tel : (051) 3358-4959|
| SICREDI Serviços |
| Porto Alegre - Brasil|
|xx|



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
handheld. Power  Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
handheld. Power  Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] What is the status of hsqldb 1.7 in JBoss 3.2?

2002-11-26 Thread Jason Dillon
I am not sure, but I believe the changes to back port might be small... 
you could post a patch... getting you closer to a RW... if you want it 
that is.

--jason


On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 01:55  PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

I'm trying to get PetStore 1.3.1 running with 3.2 but its DAO code uses
ResultSet.absolute() which is not supported by hsqldb 1.6 but is by 
1.7.1

Will the changes to support 1.7.1 be backported to 3.2 before its 
release?

thanks
jeremy



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
handheld. Power  Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T 
handheld. Power  Color in a compact size! 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty NIO SL in JBoss 3.0.4 no worky

2002-11-26 Thread Jason Dillon
Curious, but does the ajp (or whatever the apache connector is called)  
use many threads?  If it does, then would it make sense to use nio  
there too?

--jason


On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 08:33  AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:


It's important to remember that the jetty nio implementation
is not so much aimed at increasing socket performance - rather it's
aim is to reduce the number of threads required by avoiding
allocating threads to idle connections.

This is more to avoid problems on operating systems that become
undstable or non linear with large numbers of threads allocated.

To date, the few organizations that have tried nio have eventually
gone back to using the normal listener.  It has helped while they
had other threading issues with their systems. Once the OS/JVM
have been patched properly, most big irons don't have too much
trouble with large numbers of threads.

Do selects over large number of sockets can prove to be more
difficult for many OS's  - even those with /dev/poll.

Note that the nature of the servlet/filter API means that the
true promise of NIO will never be realized until the spec
is radically changed.  Some servers may be able to use NIO to
assist with serving static content, but if static content is
to be made a special case, then you may as well serve it from
a kernal server rather than java.

While the servlet spec is in it's current revision, you will
never get data streaming directly from a direct memory mapped
buffer, out the http socket without touching user space.

cheers

Jules Gosnell wrote: Anything is possible. Anyway, the standard  
Listener works fine in 1.4
and Greg has chosen to keep it on as the default and make a special  
case of the NIO Listener which, whilst giving better throughput at  
high volumes may actually be slower at low ones. I would rather stick  
with standard Jetty's approach, since I have enough branches to  
maintain already :-(
If anyone wants to go this way badly, they can donate a  
PortableListener which wrap-n-delegates to a dynamically chosen Jetty  
Listener and I will alter the config to use this instead.
Jules
James Higginbotham wrote:
Jules,

Um... I hate to say this, but I think Weblogic works around this - it
defaults to nio and backs off to its older non-nio.. They used to  
call
it their performance pack before 1.4, and have since just swapped
theirs for nio I think..
You said it was a static config, but I don't see why you can't  
abstract
out the strategy, and back off to the default strategy if nio isn't
available. Just a thought, and may sound simpler than the impl, not
sure.. I haven't looked a the Jetty codebase in a while..
James

-Original Message-
From: Jules Gosnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,  
November 21, 2002 6:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty NIO SL in JBoss 3.0.4 no worky


Peter Fagerlund wrote:

torsdagen den 21 november 2002 kl 11.46 skrev Jason Dillon:


Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?



Use a runtime switch ...


1. Jetty's config is static - I could work around it
2. You would need to build to the LCD (1.3) and then do another  
build for optional 1.4 components...


Or - we just live with it until we can force a move to 1.4, of  
course then we will have the same problem with 1.5...

Software huh !

Jules




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf  
___
Jboss-development mailing list

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development






__
__
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs  
SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service  
working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
__
__


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


__ 
__
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service  
working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com

Re: [JBoss-dev] TODO: NetBoot PetStore

2002-11-22 Thread Jason Dillon
Yes, I am hoping this will be the case... seems like a no brainer to me 
though.

--jason


On Friday, November 22, 2002, at 08:57  AM, Peter Fagerlund wrote:


fredagen den 22 november 2002 kl 01.35 skrev James Cook:


Prob the most interesting part will be setting it up to work on hsql 
out
of the box.

Please consider using a lookup of DefaultDS instead of calling hsqldb 
direct in any generic code.

/peter_f



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



[JBoss-dev] Jetty NIO SL in JBoss 3.0.4 no worky

2002-11-21 Thread Jason Dillon
Looks like the Jetty NIO listener for JBoss 3.0.4 does not work out of 
the box (ie. simply uncommenting the nio listener def).

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] TODO: NetBoot PetStore

2002-11-21 Thread Jason Dillon
Anyone want to make a NetBoot configuration which runs the latest 
PetStore from SUN?  I have been meaning to do this for awhile, but 
never seem to find the time.  This is a simple task for someone who has 
setup the PetStore in JBoss 3.x before, or an intermediate task for 
someone who is looking to help us out.

Let me know. I want to get this function soon, as it is a powerful 
example of how NetBoot works and allows users to see how JBoss works in 
a semi-real world situation.

So, anyone want to take a shot?  I can advise as needed... but please 
not smart asses.  If you would like to help great I do not need more 
stress yo!

Let me know, a RW could be in it for ya ;)

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty NIO SL in JBoss 3.0.4 no worky

2002-11-21 Thread Jason Dillon
Bah... this sucks.  Can't we get one build to function for both?  Or do  
we have to build a 1.3 and 1.4 version?  Blah :(

A side note, any reason why we do not start the nio and ajp (or  
whatever it is called) by default, then let users remove or uncomment  
to disabled.  This might help catch such problems... note sure.

--jason


On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 01:41  AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:

Jason Dillon wrote:


Looks like the Jetty NIO listener for JBoss 3.0.4 does not work out  
of the box (ie. simply uncommenting the nio listener def).

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

It is only available in a 1.4 build, and I assume (mother of all f*ck  
ups) that JBoss is built on a 1.3 JVM.

Pull down a copy of Jetty-4.2.2 from SF and substitute the jars in  
your jbossweb.sar with the ones in this distro - It is built on 1.4

I'll put a comment in the jboss-service.xml about this - Thanks.


Jules

P.S.

Building your own JBoss on 1.4 will not currently help, as I have not  
checked in the 1.4 code.



___ 
_
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
___ 
_


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty NIO SL in JBoss 3.0.4 no worky

2002-11-21 Thread Jason Dillon
Wait, do you mean that if built with 1.4 that it will function, and  
that 1.3 will behave.

I think we need to get the system in such a state that we can build  
with the latest supported VM and produce a binary compatible with older  
releases... not sure what the details are involved though.

Bah, fucking Java... write once, package a billion times

--jason


On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 01:41  AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:

Jason Dillon wrote:


Looks like the Jetty NIO listener for JBoss 3.0.4 does not work out  
of the box (ie. simply uncommenting the nio listener def).

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

It is only available in a 1.4 build, and I assume (mother of all f*ck  
ups) that JBoss is built on a 1.3 JVM.

Pull down a copy of Jetty-4.2.2 from SF and substitute the jars in  
your jbossweb.sar with the ones in this distro - It is built on 1.4

I'll put a comment in the jboss-service.xml about this - Thanks.


Jules

P.S.

Building your own JBoss on 1.4 will not currently help, as I have not  
checked in the 1.4 code.



___ 
_
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
___ 
_


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



[JBoss-dev] Big Brother ala Java...

2002-11-21 Thread Jason Dillon
Someone should write a Big Brother clone using JBoss technologies.  BB 
is simple technology, but is way to complex to configure and maintain.  
Using JBoss NetBoot it would be trivial to bring up new systems.  Using 
J2EE technologies it would be trivial to setup the configuration data 
model and provide HMTL/WAP/Whatever displays.

Shit, I need to clone myself.  So much todo and so little time.  Anyone 
interested in working to build a better future... let me know I have a 
handful of really good projects for you to work on.

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty NIO SL in JBoss 3.0.4 no worky

2002-11-21 Thread Jason Dillon
Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?

--jason



On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 02:29  AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 21 Nov, Jason Dillon wrote:

Bah... this sucks.  Can't we get one build to function for both?  Or  
do
we have to build a 1.3 and 1.4 version?  Blah :(

Its the same for jaas. A version build för 1.4 will NOT work on 1.3,
because the JAAS classes will be missing!

//Peter


A side note, any reason why we do not start the nio and ajp (or
whatever it is called) by default, then let users remove or uncomment
to disabled.  This might help catch such problems... note sure.

--jason


On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 01:41  AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:


Jason Dillon wrote:


Looks like the Jetty NIO listener for JBoss 3.0.4 does not work out
of the box (ie. simply uncommenting the nio listener def).

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


It is only available in a 1.4 build, and I assume (mother of all f*ck
ups) that JBoss is built on a 1.3 JVM.

Pull down a copy of Jetty-4.2.2 from SF and substitute the jars in
your jbossweb.sar with the ones in this distro - It is built on 1.4

I'll put a comment in the jboss-service.xml about this - Thanks.


Jules

P.S.

Building your own JBoss on 1.4 will not currently help, as I have not
checked in the 1.4 code.



_ 
__
_
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs  
SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service  
working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
_ 
__
_


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


--

Peter Antman Technology in Media, Box 34105 100 26  
Stockholm
Systems ArchitectWWW: http://www.tim.se
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]WWW: http://www.backsource.org
Phone: +46-(0)8-506 381 11 Mobile: 070-675 3942




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty NIO SL in JBoss 3.0.4 no worky

2002-11-21 Thread Jason Dillon
Um ya, but how... if the JVM can not handle it then an app level system 
must be in place to load the version specific instance based on thr 
current JV.

Surely someone else has run into this problem and found a usable 
solution to it... anyone know?

Or perhaps we are doomed to build for 1.3 and 1.4?  That really seems 
anit-java i principal.

--jason


On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 03:50  AM, Peter Fagerlund wrote:


torsdagen den 21 november 2002 kl 11.46 skrev Jason Dillon:


Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?


Use a runtime switch ...



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty NIO SL in JBoss 3.0.4 no worky

2002-11-21 Thread Jason Dillon
Um... so the phrase crack smoker comes to mind... anyone else?

--jason


On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 04:24  AM, Peter Fagerlund wrote:


Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?


Use a runtime switch ...


in a  preprocessor ala xDoclet ?



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty NIO SL in JBoss 3.0.4 no worky

2002-11-21 Thread Jason Dillon
Right, we will always have this problem... is there a solution?   I  
think we have to tools, basically interfaces and dynamic class loading  
ala factories... blah.


--jason



On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 04:34  AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:

Peter Fagerlund wrote:



torsdagen den 21 november 2002 kl 11.46 skrev Jason Dillon:


Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?



Use a runtime switch ...


1. Jetty's config is static - I could work around it
2. You would need to build to the LCD (1.3) and then do another build  
for optional 1.4 components...


Or - we just live with it until we can force a move to 1.4, of course  
then we will have the same problem with 1.5...

Software huh !

Jules





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development






___ 
_
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
___ 
_


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] TODO: NetBoot PetStore

2002-11-21 Thread Jason Dillon
Go for it!  Let me know how long you think it will take and if you need 
any help.

--jason


On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 11:52  AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

I'll give it a shot if you can't find someone who has done the PetStore
before - I'd be taking the intermediate route. I'm assuming most of the
effort here is deploying it to JBoss and configuring the necessary
resources.

Jeremy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
Jason
Dillon
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] TODO: NetBoot PetStore


Anyone want to make a NetBoot configuration which runs the latest
PetStore from SUN?  I have been meaning to do this for awhile, but
never seem to find the time.  This is a simple task for someone who 
has
setup the PetStore in JBoss 3.x before, or an intermediate task for
someone who is looking to help us out.

Let me know. I want to get this function soon, as it is a powerful
example of how NetBoot works and allows users to see how JBoss works 
in
a semi-real world situation.

So, anyone want to take a shot?  I can advise as needed... but please
not smart asses.  If you would like to help great I do not need more
stress yo!

Let me know, a RW could be in it for ya ;)

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] Big Brother ala Java...

2002-11-21 Thread Jason Dillon
It is a system monitoring tool: http://bb4.com

--jason


On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 06:08  AM, Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI 
Serviços wrote:

what woul'd be the BigBrother, is it that reality show : ))?

Jason Dillon wrote:

Someone should write a Big Brother clone using JBoss technologies.  
BB is simple technology, but is way to complex to configure and 
maintain.  Using JBoss NetBoot it would be trivial to bring up new 
systems.  Using J2EE technologies it would be trivial to setup the 
configuration data model and provide HMTL/WAP/Whatever displays.
Shit, I need to clone myself.  So much todo and so little time.  
Anyone interested in working to build a better future... let me know 
I have a handful of really good projects for you to work on.
--jason
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


--

| Emerson Cargnin  |
| Analista de Sistemas Sr. |
| Tel : (051) 3358-4959|
| SICREDI Serviços |
| Porto Alegre - Brasil|
|xx|



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] Metadata Service

2002-11-13 Thread Jason Dillon
I would be careful about going with a huge file, these tend to become 
unnamable fast.

--jason


On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 09:07  AM, Bill Burke wrote:

Dain and I were IMing.  He said Scott was thinking about a MetaData
service...

My idea for a MetaData/Configuration service would be the ability to
register for callbacks based on XPATHS.  So, all config of jboss would 
be
stored in one big XML Document.  Components insert their config there, 
and
register for callbacks on this config via XPATHS.  So, this config can 
be
managed centrally, yet, components can easily be notified with changes 
via a
simple mechanism.

Bill



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Are you worried about
your web server security? Click here for a FREE Thawte
Apache SSL Guide and answer your Apache SSL security
needs: http://www.gothawte.com/rd523.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Are you worried about 
your web server security? Click here for a FREE Thawte 
Apache SSL Guide and answer your Apache SSL security 
needs: http://www.gothawte.com/rd523.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] Metadata Service

2002-11-13 Thread Jason Dillon
If we can add an import mechanism then we can have both.  I think a 
small set of files is better than one big file is better than a million 
little files.

--jason


On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 02:49  PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

One huge file is better than a million little files scattered across 
my hard drive, but that's not saying a lot.

-dain

Jason Dillon wrote:
I would be careful about going with a huge file, these tend to become 
unnamable fast.
--jason
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 09:07  AM, Bill Burke wrote:
Dain and I were IMing.  He said Scott was thinking about a MetaData
service...

My idea for a MetaData/Configuration service would be the ability to
register for callbacks based on XPATHS.  So, all config of jboss 
would be
stored in one big XML Document.  Components insert their config 
there, and
register for callbacks on this config via XPATHS.  So, this config 
can be
managed centrally, yet, components can easily be notified with 
changes via a
simple mechanism.

Bill



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Are you worried about
your web server security? Click here for a FREE Thawte
Apache SSL Guide and answer your Apache SSL security
needs: http://www.gothawte.com/rd523.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Are you worried about your web 
server security? Click here for a FREE Thawte Apache SSL Guide and 
answer your Apache SSL security needs: 
http://www.gothawte.com/rd523.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


--

Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect JBossCMP
JBoss Group, LLC




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Are you worried about your web 
server security? Click here for a FREE Thawte Apache SSL Guide and 
answer your Apache SSL security needs: 
http://www.gothawte.com/rd523.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Are you worried about 
your web server security? Click here for a FREE Thawte 
Apache SSL Guide and answer your Apache SSL security 
needs: http://www.gothawte.com/rd523.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] New thirdparty structure sucks

2002-11-12 Thread Jason Dillon
CVS sucks...

--jason


On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 11:02  AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:


rant
Because of the new structure when I do an update in the thirdpaty 
package it doesn't pickup the added directories.  For example the 
apache-commons package was just added, but when I do an update from 
the jboss-head root or jboss-head/thirdparty the package doesn't come 
down.
/rant

Is there a cvs command to checkout only 
jboss-head/thirdparty/apache-commons by hand?

-dain



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd522.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: 
To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, 
click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: 
http://www.gothawte.com/rd522.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] New thirdparty structure sucks

2002-11-12 Thread Jason Dillon
Yes.

--jason


On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 11:23  AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:


Thanks...

Is get an alias for checkout?

How do I know _jboss_thirdparty  is the right name to use?  Is this 
name from the modules file?

-dain

Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi Dain,
cd jboss-head
cvs get _jboss_thirdparty
cvs update and aliases don't work properly :-(
Regards,
Adrian

From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: JBoss-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] New thirdparty structure sucks
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:02:27 -0600

rant
Because of the new structure when I do an update in the thirdpaty 
package it doesn't pickup the added directories.  For example the 
apache-commons package was just added, but when I do an update from 
the jboss-head root or jboss-head/thirdparty the package doesn't 
come down.
/rant

Is there a cvs command to checkout only 
jboss-head/thirdparty/apache-commons by hand?

-dain



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd522.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd522.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


--

Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect JBossCMP
JBoss Group, LLC




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd522.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: 
To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, 
click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: 
http://www.gothawte.com/rd522.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] New thirdparty structure sucks

2002-11-12 Thread Jason Dillon
This is not true for jboss-head or other psuedo module created via 
CVSROOT/modules.  Update will not check CVSROOT/modules for changes, it 
will only work off of the local data in CVS/Entires.

--jason


On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 11:20  AM, Taylor,Timothy L. wrote:

cvs up -d

will create directories that exist in the repository, but don't exist 
in your sandbox.
Another useful option is -P will will prune directories from your 
sandbox that are empty.
You can add the following to your .cvsrc file to make these be 
defaults

update -d -P

- Tim

Dain Sundstrom wrote:

rant
Because of the new structure when I do an update in the thirdpaty 
package it doesn't pickup the added directories.  For example the 
apache-commons package was just added, but when I do an update from 
the jboss-head root or jboss-head/thirdparty the package doesn't come 
down.
/rant

Is there a cvs command to checkout only 
jboss-head/thirdparty/apache-commons by hand?

-dain



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd522.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd522.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: 
To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, 
click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: 
http://www.gothawte.com/rd522.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


Re: [JBoss-dev] building jboss

2002-11-11 Thread Jason Dillon
To build HEAD you need to checkout jboss-head not jboss-all.

--jason


On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 02:02  PM, Publius Ismanescu wrote:


Hi,

I downloaded the source using WinCVS.
and this is the output that I get when I build.
Please let me know what I am doing wrong.


Output:

D:\JBoss\jboss-all\buildbuild
Calling ..\tools\bin\ant.bat -logger 
org.apache.tools.ant.NoBannerLogger
Buildfile: build.xml

_buildmagic:init:
Trying to override old definition of task property

BUILD FAILED
file:D:/JBoss/jboss-all/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/tools.ent:29:
taskdef
class xdoclet.modules.jmx.JMXDocletTask cannot be found

Total time: 2 seconds
Press any key to continue . . .

D:\JBoss\jboss-all\build






Thank you in advance for all your help
Publius


OS: Windows 2000
JDK : 1.4.0_02



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] J2EE Timer Service

2002-11-10 Thread Jason Dillon
What about Quartz?  Lets integrate instead of invent where we can.

--jason


snip
what do you guys think of a new scheduler?

marc f

 -Original Message-
 From: Ben Sabrin [mailto:ben;jboss.org]
 Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:58 AM
 To: Marc Fleury
 Subject: FW: Quartz J2EE Scheduler
   for your consumption.
  Ben Sabrin
 Director of Sales and Business Development
 JBoss Group, LLC
   -Original Message-
 From: Nathan Phelps [mailto:nphelps;solarc.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 9:20 PM
 To: 'Ben Sabrin'
 Subject: Quartz J2EE Scheduler
   Here is the link to the Scheduler I was talking about today:
 http://quartz.sourceforge.net
  Again, thanks for your visit.
 I've already gotten feedback about how much everyone enjoyed it.
  Thanks,
  Nathan

/snip

On Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 11:15  AM, Scott M Stark wrote:


I have not seen anyone mention this so go ahead.


Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC


- Original Message -
From: Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] J2EE Timer Service



Hi Geeks

Did anyone started to develop the EJB 2.1 Timer Service ?

Otherwise I will have a look into it because I think we could
use the Scheduler.

Have fun - Andy




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] taming the beast and build MAGIC

2002-11-04 Thread Jason Dillon
 that one though.

Also, please do not just tell me to go read the documentation - I
have looked
at JMX and read the 3.0 book already. I have also perused this
site fairly
thoroughly I think. I'd be surprised to discover that I have
overlooked some
obvious source unless it has been added in the past week.

At the same time, I must confess (as if it is not obvious enough
already) that
I am fairly new to open source - my professional experience lies
primarily
with offline mainframes and PCs in a development environment 
managed by
somebody else.

Feel free to contact me personally at the e-mail accompanying
this posting.

TIA,

Ben Tompkins

On Friday 01 November 2002 09:36 pm, Ben Tompkins wrote:
Ok - great - but the physics bit (the first, shorter faq that


goes on about


cantorian fractal spacetime is mostly plagiarized from a


real paper I


found on the net. Do you want we me to cut it, seek permission,


or what. I


realize that I have created a silly issue - but you never know...

On Friday 01 November 2002 05:05 pm, Jason Dillon wrote:

This is funny, funny shit.  Submit a real patch (ala sf.net


w/attached


file) and I will commit this.

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power  Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power  Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power  Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power  Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power  Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Training @ Geneva

2002-11-04 Thread Jason Dillon
This is resolved.

--jason


On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 11:26  AM, Alex Loubyansky wrote:


Hello Sacha,

clicking on Read More on the site I get
HTTP ERROR: 404 /services/training Not Found

alex

Monday, November 04, 2002, 7:12:31 PM, you wrote:

SL Hello,

SL It seems that no e-mail address was available on JBoss.org web 
site to
SL subscribe to the Geneva training.

SL If you want to register for the JBoss Advanced Training taking 
place in
SL Geneva at the end of the month (25-28 November 2002), please use 
this e-mail
SL address:

SL mailto:sales;jboss.org?subject=Geneva


SL It's gonna be a great training! (well, like all JBoss trainings ;) 
)

SL Cheers,



SL Sacha


--
Best regards,
 Alex Loubyansky




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



[JBoss-dev] test2...

2002-11-01 Thread Jason Dillon
This is funny, funny shit.  Submit a real patch (ala sf.net w/attached 
file) and I will commit this.

--jason



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm 
Tungsten T handheld. Power  Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


RE: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work

2002-10-31 Thread Jason Dillon
This is a recent change to the build system.  Feel free to submit a
patch of the docs.

--jason


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Tompkins
 Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:03 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work
 
 Is there some reason why the precise commands required
 to checkout a correct build cannot simply be posted
 somewhere?
 
 I am using:
 
 CVSROOT=pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss
 
 cvs login (if necessary)
 cvs co jboss-head
 
 or
 
 cvs co -r release-tag release-module
 
 I see that some recent commits have specified  Branch_3_0.
 
 So my next attempt will be:
 
 cvs co -r Branch_3_0 jboss-3.0
 
 Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
 
 
 As far as I can make out, the only system dependency is the
 Java VM and the PATH. The build scripts unset/ignore ANT_HOME,
 because ant, as well as the various XML parsers are included in the
build,
 right? I'd also like to know whether anyone has succeeded in
 building/debugging with Eclipse. There was a mailing regarding this
 to the effect that the thirdparty subdirectory needs to be configured
 especially for Eclipse and that builds prior to jboss-head are not so
 configured- but I haven't even been able to build anything
 that recent outside of Eclipse and is generally harder to build inside
 an IDE than outside one - so I haven't even bothered to try it.
 
 
 On Thursday 31 October 2002 10:35 am, danch wrote:
  So, Ben...are you hinting that your less than satisfied with the
build
  system? That's odd, _nobody_ _ever_ complains about the build
system!
 ;^})
 
  yours in sympathy,
  danch
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
 of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
 Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
 http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
 ___
 Jboss-development mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



RE: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work

2002-10-31 Thread Jason Dillon
 Ok. I can patch the doc with the content of my last mailing How to
get
 it to build. But I will need a cvs account to do that.
 
 Ben

Submit a patch.  We do not give up RW for nothing.

--jason




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



RE: [JBoss-dev] Documentation Patch Question

2002-10-31 Thread Jason Dillon
The best thing to patch right now would be the buildsystem guide and
faq.  Look in website/content/src/web/default/developers/*

--jason


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Tompkins
 Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:57 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [JBoss-dev] Documentation Patch Question
 
 Exactly what documentation are we talking about?
 
 Is this it?
 
 jboss/manual/src/xdocs/jbossdocs.xml
 
 If not, please tell me which file(s) you would like me to patch.
 
 
 On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 16:59, Jason Dillon wrote:
   Ok. I can patch the doc with the content of my last mailing How
to
  get
   it to build. But I will need a cvs account to do that.
  
   Ben
 
  Submit a patch.  We do not give up RW for nothing.
 
  --jason
 
 
 
 
  ---
  This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
  of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
  Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
  http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
  ___
  Jboss-development mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
 of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
 Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
 http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
 ___
 Jboss-development mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >