RE: RE: [JBoss-dev] init - create simple API change
stop wasting my time jason marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason |Dillon |Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 12:19 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] init - create simple API change | | | Jason what part of the following sentences: | | 1- the word create is more explicit than the word | init | 2- create/destroy makes more sense to me than | init/destroy | | can you not parse, that is what is wrong with init | any questions, talk to my horse, I am signing off | |Perhaps it is just my interpretation of the words init create. |I think that init would perforce post construction initialization. | |Create is more of a factory method, which might return an instance |of something.Whatever, if you like create over init, then create |it is... it just seems a little strange to me. | |Mai pen rai. | |--jason | |__ |View: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=5202 | |___ |Jboss-development mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] init - create simple API change
What is wrong with init? I mean why does the working seem unclear? --jason On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, marc fleury wrote: short and sweet, [b]init/destroy[/b] will become [b]create/destroy[/b] is much clearer: you use this to create your service, set it up, expensive operation done, destroy is explicit start/stop was clear: you use this to start and stop SO IF YOU HAVE MBEANS OUT THERE make sure to port the [b]init to create[/b]. This only applies to your custom MBeans I will of course update the ones in cvs It is going to create a bit or portability problems but I think making this clear once and for all is a good thing (and this one is simple) __ View: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=5202 ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] init - create simple API change
|SO IF YOU HAVE MBEANS OUT THERE make sure to port the [b]init to |create[/b]. | |This only applies to your custom MBeans I will of course update |the ones in cvs Well it is done, move done in (my local cvs) for all the init-create, man I better finish the proxy debugging tomorrow otherwise by the end of the weekend I won't be able to commit all the classes this changed since you guys will probably commit in parralel in the meantime, but since this is one-liners in all classes it shouldnt throw diff off (bad surprises this morning after 3 weeks in cvs isolation) Jason what part of the following sentences: 1- the word create is more explicit than the word init 2- create/destroy makes more sense to me than init/destroy can you not parse, that is what is wrong with init any questions, talk to my horse, I am signing off, marcf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] init - create simple API change
Jason what part of the following sentences: 1- the word create is more explicit than the word init 2- create/destroy makes more sense to me than init/destroy can you not parse, that is what is wrong with init any questions, talk to my horse, I am signing off Perhaps it is just my interpretation of the words init create. I think that init would perforce post construction initialization. Create is more of a factory method, which might return an instance of something.Whatever, if you like create over init, then create it is... it just seems a little strange to me. Mai pen rai. --jason __ View: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=5202 ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
