Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Andrew Bayer]

Yeah, it's painful and needs serious revisiting. I'd be up for discussions
around that for 2.0 or soon after. I think that'd be valuable.

A.

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Kanstantsin Shautsou <
kanstantsin@gmail.com> wrote:

> I missed my favorite question :)
>
> Jenkins Cloud API is not enough for anything IMHO. It was actual 5 years
> ago when AWS appeared. Today you may want more levels of provisioning:
> DC locations/groups/machines/containers in it.
> All cloud plugins are hacks and copy-pastes.
> Imho issue is in Jenkins design that ends into NodeProvisioner, Labels and
> locked Queue.
> @Nigelm proposed PR for having NodeProvisioner request to have groups of
> slaves, but it wasn't merged.
> IMHO So the only way of implementing cloud related things is making
> plugins full of hacks (around QTD, job types, launchers, etc).
>
> Let's wait for 2.0, 3.0, 4.?
>
> On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 7:31:03 PM UTC+3, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>>
>> So, do you agree that  cloud api is not good enough for docker containers
>> ?
>>
>> On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>>>
>>> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the
>>> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>>>
>>> Details are in the readme of the project
>>> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves
>>>
>>>
>>> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>>>
>>> Surya
>>>
>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/2479ec52-fafb-4e20-8eb3-39d15810268b%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPbPdOZi%3DNvgmAucRZ2EbcSYjTpBvO0Oiwwz3RnMahN1FvaA1g%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Kanstantsin Shautsou]

I missed my favorite question :)

Jenkins Cloud API is not enough for anything IMHO. It was actual 5 years 
ago when AWS appeared. Today you may want more levels of provisioning:
DC locations/groups/machines/containers in it.
All cloud plugins are hacks and copy-pastes.
Imho issue is in Jenkins design that ends into NodeProvisioner, Labels and 
locked Queue.
@Nigelm proposed PR for having NodeProvisioner request to have groups of 
slaves, but it wasn't merged. 
IMHO So the only way of implementing cloud related things is making plugins 
full of hacks (around QTD, job types, launchers, etc). 

Let's wait for 2.0, 3.0, 4.?

On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 7:31:03 PM UTC+3, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>
> So, do you agree that  cloud api is not good enough for docker containers ?
>
> On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>>
>> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the 
>> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>>
>> Details are in the readme of the project 
>> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
>>
>>
>> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> Surya
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/2479ec52-fafb-4e20-8eb3-39d15810268b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Nigel Magnay]

I haven't fully grokked how the alternative launch scheme works (I assume
it's operating as a launcher higher up the food chain). I don't know if
this is giving you options of controlling the build environment before it
is launched based on the build it is about to execute.

I would imagine you could add a similar launcher into (say) docker-plugin.
90% of this stuff is the same (UI to capture user settings); the heavy
lifting is deferred to a library anyway (e.g docker-java); there's only
really a tiny difference in each (cloud api implementation, launcher).

The cloud API is "sufficient" (in that bar the point above) it allows the
lifecycle you need. There's plenty of people using it that way. That's not
so say that it doesn't have problems. What's a touch depressing is ISTM
that the non-cloud-API approach is eventually going to come full-circle and
re-implement all the same stuff the cloud API is supposed to :-/ E.g:
balancing between hosts based on their current active workload. I would
have though that the two things you mention (pause before starting,
attaching start logs to the relevant build) ought to be solveable in the
core -- that way *all* cloud provisioners would benefit..





On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Surya Gaddipati 
wrote:

> So, do you agree that  cloud api is not good enough for docker containers ?
>
> On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>>
>> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the
>> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>>
>> Details are in the readme of the project
>> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves
>>
>>
>> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> Surya
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/0c0844f7-8c5f-410a-9781-ca1c04588686%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPYP83R66g%2BKbFDaUx-45kMrHrOydNCRjCrvRy10nhVSgTZW5w%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Nigel Magnay]

>
>
>
> nigelm,
>
> It uses queue listener to look for a label and add a slave .
>
> Docker has many, many load balancing tools , docker swarm for example. You
> can simply point jenkins to your swarm instance for docker.
>
> I see no reasons why Jenkins would be doing load balancing with docker
> containers when there are much more advanced/sophisticated solutions out
> there.
>
>
​Oh, that's easy - because you may not be using swarm. You may have docker
hosts that are unable​ to participate in a single swarm. You may have
slaves that aren't docker that you'd also like to use.

I think this is besides the point I was trying to make. I'll invert your
question. Do you think that the cloud API *ought* to be good enough for
docker containers ?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPYP83Rad8%2BtKTFv7cwUWcwYhdkcgkLA1Bf0JA1oXC2bK6zyqw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Surya Gaddipati]

So, do you agree that  cloud api is not good enough for docker containers ?

On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>
> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the 
> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>
> Details are in the readme of the project 
> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
>
>
> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Surya
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/0c0844f7-8c5f-410a-9781-ca1c04588686%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Surya Gaddipati]

> Do you think that the cloud API *ought* to be good enough for docker 
containers ? 

Not quite sure what you mean. But yea cloud api should support single use 
throwaway slaves that are tied to a single build. 

On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>
> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the 
> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>
> Details are in the readme of the project 
> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
>
>
> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Surya
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/dc03f38b-d7c3-4fab-a1e6-cebc42de2bd5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Kanstantsin Shautsou]

> On Dec 15, 2015, at 19:17, Surya Gaddipati  wrote:
> 
> >So what is your problem around Cloud API based provisioning?
> 
> 1. Delay in provisioning -> There is no technical reason user has to deal 
> with this.  This is totally a problem we can solve .
> 2.  Container booting logs should be available to user via build logs, since 
> allocation of container is part of the build. This is not currently possible.
>From Jenkins architecture when job is in queue it just an item and there is no 
>build objects. Probably you can copy provisioning logs into build in launcher 
>onAcceptedTasks() step. Or optionally it should be possible attach slave log 
>to build object as action and provide log from separate link (imho is good 
>enough).
> 
> Surya
> 
> On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the plugin 
> and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
> 
> Details are in the readme of the project
> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
> 
> 
> 
> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> Surya
> 
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/ruikEEsF_bc/unsubscribe 
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/87834380-5694-41d4-bbb2-25ce55640b12%40googlegroups.com
>  
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/1416E24A-E20D-4362-AF2B-F8FED50335AB%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Kanstantsin Shautsou]

Hi, that’s wrong info about docker-plugin. docker-plugin support:
- provisioning jenkins slaves
- building/publish images (duplicated/duplicates docker-build-publish-plugin)
- Docker container controls
All functionality is written via docker-java library layer.

> On Dec 15, 2015, at 18:59, Surya Gaddipati  wrote:
> 
> Hi Kanstantsin ,
> 
> Use case is exactly this 
> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Docker+Plugin
> 
> 
> 
> "The aim of the docker plugin is to be able to use a docker host to 
> dynamically provision a slave, run a single build, then tear-down that slave."
> 
> 
> 
> But without going through Jenkins Cloud Api.
> 
> 
> 
> Surya
> 
> 
> On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the plugin 
> and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
> 
> Details are in the readme of the project
> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
> 
> 
> 
> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> Surya
> 
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/ruikEEsF_bc/unsubscribe 
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/d5035c31-39ec-4c34-94f8-457f2ed555bd%40googlegroups.com
>  
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/378EE395-4CD2-471F-815D-21AD872D6A5A%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

['Yoann Dubreuil' via Jenkins Developers]

Hi Surya,

Thanks for your reply, I've a few questions below.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Surya Gaddipati 
wrote:

> Hi Yoann,
> Thank you for your response.
>
> >  I was wondering what was missing to rewrite a simplified version of it.
>
> So here are couple of things that I found needed to be changed
>
> 1. changed to use spotify-docker api client instead of command line, I
> needed it to talk to docker-swarm to allocated nodes
>

AFAICT, you can use a swarm endpoint with docker CLI,  you don't need a
special API for this. The docker API is a fast moving target, so wrapping
the CLI was convenient for experimenting.


> 2. Slaves are allocated based on job label not job property, much like
> cloud plugins
>

We had that feature in mind too, but didn't implement it yet.


> 3. We didn't need to run builds in another image/side image ect, we use
> docker-compose to run builds.
>

That's interesting, I don't understand why you need a docker slave then ?
Is it just to run a SCM checkout and then call docker-compose to do the
build ? I imagine that you are bind mounting the docker socket in the slave
node so you can run docker-compose?


> 4. Had to remove couple of hacks like this
> ,
> since we don't store builds on disk.
>
5. We didn't need jenkins user mounting .
>

Not sure to understand, do you mean that you don't need to tie a docker
volume to a container?


>
> This plugin simply allocates a new slave via jnlp/docker api calls. There
> is no extra magic.
>

Ok, so you just want a simple docker slave to be able to use docker-compose.

The fundamental idea behind our plugin was to replace the process startup
API with docker. Because in the end, what you want to do to build a
software is to run some commands in a controlled environment. Currently,
Jenkins achieves this by allocating a build slave, by installing all the
tools you need in it and by calling execve. This is exactly what Docker is
for. From my POV, Docker is an a API to launch a process in a controlled
environment. The container story is not interesting here. That's why I
don't think the Jenkins Cloud model fits well, Docker is not a way to
provide a slave from a light VM system. It is convenient but it's not the
optimal way to integrate Docker and Jenkins (again, my POV).

You use case it not that far, the difference is instead of starting a
random process from Jenkins after the checkout, you start docker-compose.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I really would like to understand
your use case well so I can understand the gap with existing plugins.


>
> Surya
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>>
>> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the
>> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>>
>> Details are in the readme of the project
>> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves
>>
>>
>> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> Surya
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/57db95e2-f8df-4015-9d91-3705a852aa3d%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFWoUpSg7Gwz1sh8ZubVFAanbkRyOes58vrvcS95mjaSB9UvFw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Kanstantsin Shautsou]

> On Dec 15, 2015, at 18:43, Surya Gaddipati  wrote:
> 
> Hi Yoann,
> Thank you for your response.
> 
> >  I was wondering what was missing to rewrite a simplified version of it.
> 
> So here are couple of things that I found needed to be changed
> 
> 1. changed to use spotify-docker api client instead of command line, I needed 
> it to talk to docker-swarm to allocated nodes
Binary wrapping is solution that CloudBees choose for their plugins and seems 
this plugin follow it to have compatibility. Before they released first 
*docker* plugins i proposed to cooperate work on some library but they rejected 
it.
> 2. Slaves are allocated based on job label not job property, much like cloud 
> plugins
Thats feature and required to have ability to specify container from job 
(imagine that you can’t request admin to change images).
> 3. We didn't need to run builds in another image/side image ect, we use 
> docker-compose to run builds.
Ok, it just one of features.
> 4. Had to remove couple of hacks like this 
> ,
>  since we don't store builds on disk.
> 5. We didn't need jenkins user mounting .
> 
> This plugin simply allocates a new slave via jnlp/docker api calls. There is 
> no extra magic.
> 
> Surya
P.S. i’m working on having ability to share slave configuration between Cloud 
configuration and Job Properties. Also with future docker-java release it will 
be possible to run remoting with pipes (spotify doesn’t support it afaik, dunno 
why you so want enforce plugins to use it). But that will be in 
yet-another-docker-plugin.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the plugin 
> and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
> 
> Details are in the readme of the project
> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
> 
> 
> 
> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> Surya
> 
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/ruikEEsF_bc/unsubscribe 
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/57db95e2-f8df-4015-9d91-3705a852aa3d%40googlegroups.com
>  
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/34912DB1-1FD6-411B-94E9-630315893DB2%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Surya Gaddipati]

Hi nigelm, 

The important difference between this and all other docker slaves plugin is 
that this doesn't use jenkins' cloud api for the reasons listed here 

 

On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>
> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the 
> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>
> Details are in the readme of the project 
> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
>
>
> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Surya
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/64c4afda-60ea-4d3c-9e9a-17a9dec91ce1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Surya Gaddipati]

Hi Yoann,
Thank you for your response. 

>  I was wondering what was missing to rewrite a simplified version of it.

So here are couple of things that I found needed to be changed

1. changed to use spotify-docker api client instead of command line, I 
needed it to talk to docker-swarm to allocated nodes
2. Slaves are allocated based on job label not job property, much like 
cloud plugins
3. We didn't need to run builds in another image/side image ect, we use 
docker-compose to run builds. 
4. Had to remove couple of hacks like this 
,
 
since we don't store builds on disk.
5. We didn't need jenkins user mounting .

This plugin simply allocates a new slave via jnlp/docker api calls. There 
is no extra magic. 

Surya




On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>
> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the 
> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>
> Details are in the readme of the project 
> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
>
>
> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Surya
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/57db95e2-f8df-4015-9d91-3705a852aa3d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Kanstantsin Shautsou]

Surya, could you describe your use case because it seems that you want two 
orthogonal features in one?

> On Dec 15, 2015, at 18:47, Surya Gaddipati  wrote:
> 
> Hi nigelm,
> 
> The important difference between this and all other docker slaves plugin is 
> that this doesn't use jenkins' cloud api for the reasons listed here 
> 
> 
> On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the plugin 
> and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
> 
> Details are in the readme of the project
> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
> 
> 
> 
> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> Surya
> 
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/ruikEEsF_bc/unsubscribe 
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/64c4afda-60ea-4d3c-9e9a-17a9dec91ce1%40googlegroups.com
>  
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/5DCF1CCA-8A6C-4E9F-9E13-158000B0FBD9%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Surya Gaddipati]

Hi Kanstantsin ,

Use case is exactly 
this https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Docker+Plugin 


"The aim of the docker plugin is to be able to use a docker host to 
dynamically provision a slave, run a single build, then tear-down that 
slave." 


But without going through Jenkins Cloud Api. 


Surya

On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>
> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the 
> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>
> Details are in the readme of the project 
> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
>
>
> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Surya
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/d5035c31-39ec-4c34-94f8-457f2ed555bd%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Kanstantsin Shautsou]

Yes, i'm working on such thing in my new plugin, will notify when will have 
something working.

On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 6:41:26 PM UTC+3, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>
> Hi Oleg, 
> Thank you for your feedback. 
>
> Looks like DockerPlugin uses Jenkins clound api ( link 
> 
> )
>
> This plugin uses QueueListener to provision slaves . 
>
> Can these two approaches be integrated together ?
>
> Surya
>
> On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>>
>> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the 
>> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>>
>> Details are in the readme of the project 
>> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
>>
>>
>> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> Surya
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/fb9c00be-ad78-48c6-955b-7485e44d20c7%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

['Yoann Dubreuil' via Jenkins Developers]

Hi Surya,

As one of the author of https://github.com/ndeloof/docker-slaves-plugin , I
was wondering what was missing to rewrite a simplified version of it.

Maybe we could work together to improve this plugin instead?

Yoann.


On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Kanstantsin Shautsou <
kanstantsin@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, i'm working on such thing in my new plugin, will notify when will
> have something working.
>
> On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 6:41:26 PM UTC+3, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>>
>> Hi Oleg,
>> Thank you for your feedback.
>>
>> Looks like DockerPlugin uses Jenkins clound api ( link
>> 
>> )
>>
>> This plugin uses QueueListener to provision slaves .
>>
>> Can these two approaches be integrated together ?
>>
>> Surya
>>
>> On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>>>
>>> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the
>>> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>>>
>>> Details are in the readme of the project
>>> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves
>>>
>>>
>>> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>>>
>>> Surya
>>>
>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/fb9c00be-ad78-48c6-955b-7485e44d20c7%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFWoUpTg%3D_Eyg0YNgGT%3DqPS%2BLXY9p9Dhp1xizHtQJ5FD1GjG-A%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Nigel Magnay]

> I agree that independent Docker slave makes sense.
> IIRC such functionality is provided by one of existing Docker plugins, but
> I'm not sure. There're too many of them :(
>
> If no, I would vote for integrating the proposal into Docker-plugin if
> there is no showstoppers.
>
>
​docker-plugin already allows starting / stopping images. You may have
additional fields (e.g volumes) that it perhaps does not expose.

​I believe docker-build-step also does this.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPYP83SVBbAN6qJj5SSPAy4OSJJoxUJBMFcfBfEFFuSbbX_Urg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Surya Gaddipati]

Hi Oleg, 
Thank you for your feedback. 

Looks like DockerPlugin uses Jenkins clound api ( link 

)

This plugin uses QueueListener to provision slaves . 

Can these two approaches be integrated together ?

Surya

On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:53:44 PM UTC-6, Surya Gaddipati wrote:
>
> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the 
> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>
> Details are in the readme of the project 
> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
>
>
> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Surya
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/86194765-6a4e-4c51-8081-3670fbc1c35a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: (another) docker slaves plugin - review request

[Oleg Nenashev]

I agree that independent Docker slave makes sense.
IIRC such functionality is provided by one of existing Docker plugins, but 
I'm not sure. There're too many of them :(

If no, I would vote for integrating the proposal into Docker-plugin if 
there is no showstoppers.

Best regards,
Oleg

воскресенье, 13 декабря 2015 г., 21:53:44 UTC+3 пользователь Surya 
Gaddipati написал:
>
> This is not a hosting request. I am hoping to get some feedback on the 
> plugin and see if its worth hosting/merging into other plugins.
>
> Details are in the readme of the project 
> https://github.com/suryagaddipati/jenkins-docker-slaves 
>
>
> Pls, let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Surya
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/0bdd1240-b67c-4031-987a-9e0d6fa38bf2%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.