[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-26 Thread Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)

Hi.

Another way to think of it is:

 1. Develop a site that works without JS
 2. Work out ways to enhance each page using JS
 3. step 2 may result in JS users not seeing whole classes of pages, but
you have a fall back at any point.

This discipline may result in a better application design and may result
in a faster site and may give better options for performance
enhancement.  Or not.  It's almost certain to be more accessible and to
provide a better no-js experience.

Nathan



 -Original Message-
 From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
 Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 8:18 PM
 To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
 Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has 
 Javascript enabled?
 
 
 As much as I dislike the idea of having to develop two 
 different sites or, sometimes, just different pages, it seems 
 like that is the only way to accommodate both JS and non-JS users.
 
 I know jQuery can be used unobtrusively, but in some cases 
 that just doesn't seem to be a workable approach.
 
 For instance, one use I plan for jQuery is with calendars I develop.
 These are calendars which have one row with columns for date, 
 time, event, and location.  Usually, I put a details link 
 on the row for the page to refresh and reveal the details 
 beneath the main row.  That works well, but would be much 
 better with a slide and show jQuery effect.
 
 However, if JS isn't working, the details for every row in 
 the calendar will be showing and that's a no go.  Perhaps 
 there is a way to cause the calendar to default back to its 
 original functionality with a page refresh.
 Or the alternative is to develop two pages and send the user 
 with JS to the JS page and the non-JS user to the non-JS page.
 
 Thoughts?
 
 Rick
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Young 
 -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco)
 Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 3:48 PM
 To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
 Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has 
 Javascript enabled?
 
 
 Hi.
 
 There is another surefire solution to getting a site that 
 works with JS and non-js usage, and that is to bifurcate the 
 experience quite early on and send the two sets of users down 
 very different paths.  In that case, JS users see one set of 
 pages and non-js users see another.  
 
 ---Nathan
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] idea pages shouoglegroups.com] On Behalf
 Of Rey Bango
  Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 7:35 AM
  To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
  Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has 
 Javascript 
  enabled?
  
  
  Hi Rick,
  
  Let me summarize what everyone is saying before this turns 
 into a long 
  thread.
  
  Basically, there's no easy and surefire way of determining if JS is 
  enabled on the browser. You need to code your forms and 
 pages in the 
  traditional way that you would any non-JS application. Once 
 you have 
  those pages working correctly with proper server-side 
 validation and 
  handling, then you can look at progressive enhancement to 
 extend the 
  functionality of your pages by leveraging JS, DOM-manipulation and 
  Ajax.
  
  I realize that you're trying to find a way of doing this from a 
  server-side perspective but you're going to end up building a 
  hodge-podge solution that will not be effective. You have 
 some really 
  sharp people giving you the right advice and since I want you to be 
  successful, I highly recommend that you follow their suggestions.
  
  This is the *only* surefire way of ensuring that browsers 
 that have JS 
  disabled will work properly on your site.
  Otherwise, its a shot in the dark.
  
  Rey...
  
  Rick Faircloth wrote:
   That's what's motivating the question.
   
   I'm trying to take Progressive Enhancement, as I see it, one step 
   further by integrating the enhancement into the server-side
  process,
   where possible and applicable.
   
   This part concerns return validation result messages back
  to the form
   page, or rather back to the page itself, since I'm
  currently posting
   the form back to the page its own.
   
   If JS is disabled, then I would simply have to refresh the page.
   If JS is enabled, then I could use taconite to place
  messages on the
   page without refresh...if I'm understanding everything correctly.
   
   Rick
   
  
 


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-25 Thread Priest, James \(NIH/NIEHS\) [C]

 -Original Message-
 From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


 However, if JS isn't working, the details for every row in 
 the calendar
 will be showing and that's a no go.  Perhaps there is a way 
 to cause the
 calendar to default back to its original functionality with a 
 page refresh.
 Or the alternative is to develop two pages and send the user with JS
 to the JS page and the non-JS user to the non-JS page.


Rick - what would your non-JS page look like?? Where would your details
appear?  Anytime you get into developing two pages - you should probably
re-think your approach.

Jim


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-25 Thread Rick Faircloth

Hi, Jim...

What I've typically done with non-JS calendars is put a details link
at the end of the summary row with ?Details=YesEventID=3 at the end
of the link refreshes the page, but this time the details area for the
specified
event is showing.  Then the user just clicks Hide Details with ?Details=No
on the
end of the URL back to the same page and the details are gone.

I use ColdFusion CFIF statements to determine whether or not to display the
details.

Usually the calendars are not that full of info such that it would pose a
burden on the
server to send all summary and detail info at once, but if there were
sufficient data,
I'd set up some kind of paging to limit the amount of data to return.

It just seems like it might be easier to work with two different pages,
non-JS and JS,
rather than intermingle so much if and cfif code, although I could be wrong
because
I haven't done this before.  I'm just starting to work with JS and jQuery...

Rick


-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 9:25 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


 -Original Message-
 From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


 However, if JS isn't working, the details for every row in 
 the calendar
 will be showing and that's a no go.  Perhaps there is a way 
 to cause the
 calendar to default back to its original functionality with a 
 page refresh.
 Or the alternative is to develop two pages and send the user with JS
 to the JS page and the non-JS user to the non-JS page.


Rick - what would your non-JS page look like?? Where would your details
appear?  Anytime you get into developing two pages - you should probably
re-think your approach.

Jim




[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-25 Thread Priest, James \(NIH/NIEHS\) [C]

 -Original Message-
 From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 Wait, I see what you're saying... the same link would serve both
 JS and non-JS users.  How would a link that would work for both
 situations be coded?

Seems like you could have two different links:

div id=js-onhttp://mylink/ajax.cfm/div
div id=js-offhttp://mylink/query.cfm/div

Then you'd set js-on to 'display: none;' by default and then turn it on
with jQuery (and turn off 'js-off').

Jim


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-25 Thread Scott Sauyet


Rick Faircloth wrote:

I think I may try the AJAX solution, partly because I just want to get
more experience with AJAX and mostly because it seems to be the
best solution.


It's not that much harder client-side than the others.  But there really 
is more work to do on the server...



Wait, I see what you're saying... the same link would serve both
JS and non-JS users.  How would a link that would work for both
situations be coded?


How to code the server side is way outside the domain of this list.  On 
the client side, perhaps it could be done as simply as this (untested):


a class=details href=eventDetails/?id=27details/a

$(document).ready(function() {
$(a.details).click(function() {
$(this).parents(tr).eq(0)
   .after(tr/tr)
   .next(tr).load(this.href + ajax=true);
return false;
});
});

This is bare-bones, of course.  You would probably want an animation on 
the display.  Once the ajax has been loaded, you would probably want to 
change the click to a show-hide effect on the newly loaded details row. 
 And you would probably want to guard against re-ajaxing the same 
details on subsequent clicks.  But I think that's the basic idea.


On the server side, your eventDetails code would need to check if the 
ajax parameter was set to true.  If so, just return the contents of that 
row; if not, return a whole page.


Does that help?

  -- Scott



[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-25 Thread Rick Faircloth

I'll give that a try... thanks, James.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 2:14 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


 -Original Message-
 From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 Wait, I see what you're saying... the same link would serve both
 JS and non-JS users.  How would a link that would work for both
 situations be coded?

Seems like you could have two different links:

div id=js-onhttp://mylink/ajax.cfm/div
div id=js-offhttp://mylink/query.cfm/div

Then you'd set js-on to 'display: none;' by default and then turn it on
with jQuery (and turn off 'js-off').

Jim




[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-24 Thread Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)

Hi.

There is another surefire solution to getting a site that works with JS
and non-js usage, and that is to bifurcate the experience quite early on
and send the two sets of users down very different paths.  In that case,
JS users see one set of pages and non-js users see another.  

---Nathan


 -Original Message-
 From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] idea pages shouoglegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rey Bango
 Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 7:35 AM
 To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
 Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has 
 Javascript enabled?
 
 
 Hi Rick,
 
 Let me summarize what everyone is saying before this turns 
 into a long thread.
 
 Basically, there's no easy and surefire way of determining if 
 JS is enabled on the browser. You need to code your forms and 
 pages in the traditional way that you would any non-JS 
 application. Once you have those pages working correctly with 
 proper server-side validation and handling, then you can look 
 at progressive enhancement to extend the functionality of 
 your pages by leveraging JS, DOM-manipulation and Ajax.
 
 I realize that you're trying to find a way of doing this from 
 a server-side perspective but you're going to end up building 
 a hodge-podge solution that will not be effective. You have 
 some really sharp people giving you the right advice and 
 since I want you to be successful, I highly recommend that 
 you follow their suggestions.
 
 This is the *only* surefire way of ensuring that browsers 
 that have JS disabled will work properly on your site. 
 Otherwise, its a shot in the dark.
 
 Rey...
 
 Rick Faircloth wrote:
  That's what's motivating the question.
  
  I'm trying to take Progressive Enhancement, as I see it, one step 
  further by integrating the enhancement into the server-side 
 process, 
  where possible and applicable.
  
  This part concerns return validation result messages back 
 to the form 
  page, or rather back to the page itself, since I'm 
 currently posting 
  the form back to the page its own.
  
  If JS is disabled, then I would simply have to refresh the page.
  If JS is enabled, then I could use taconite to place 
 messages on the 
  page without refresh...if I'm understanding everything correctly.
  
  Rick
  
 


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-24 Thread Rick Faircloth

As much as I dislike the idea of having to develop two different sites
or, sometimes, just different pages, it seems like that is the only way
to accommodate both JS and non-JS users.

I know jQuery can be used unobtrusively, but in some cases that just
doesn't seem to be a workable approach.

For instance, one use I plan for jQuery is with calendars I develop.
These are calendars which have one row with columns for date, time,
event, and location.  Usually, I put a details link on the row for the
page
to refresh and reveal the details beneath the main row.  That works well,
but would be much better with a slide and show jQuery effect.

However, if JS isn't working, the details for every row in the calendar
will be showing and that's a no go.  Perhaps there is a way to cause the
calendar to default back to its original functionality with a page refresh.
Or the alternative is to develop two pages and send the user with JS
to the JS page and the non-JS user to the non-JS page.

Thoughts?

Rick



-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco)
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 3:48 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


Hi.

There is another surefire solution to getting a site that works with JS
and non-js usage, and that is to bifurcate the experience quite early on
and send the two sets of users down very different paths.  In that case,
JS users see one set of pages and non-js users see another.  

---Nathan


 -Original Message-
 From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] idea pages shouoglegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rey Bango
 Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 7:35 AM
 To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
 Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has 
 Javascript enabled?
 
 
 Hi Rick,
 
 Let me summarize what everyone is saying before this turns 
 into a long thread.
 
 Basically, there's no easy and surefire way of determining if 
 JS is enabled on the browser. You need to code your forms and 
 pages in the traditional way that you would any non-JS 
 application. Once you have those pages working correctly with 
 proper server-side validation and handling, then you can look 
 at progressive enhancement to extend the functionality of 
 your pages by leveraging JS, DOM-manipulation and Ajax.
 
 I realize that you're trying to find a way of doing this from 
 a server-side perspective but you're going to end up building 
 a hodge-podge solution that will not be effective. You have 
 some really sharp people giving you the right advice and 
 since I want you to be successful, I highly recommend that 
 you follow their suggestions.
 
 This is the *only* surefire way of ensuring that browsers 
 that have JS disabled will work properly on your site. 
 Otherwise, its a shot in the dark.
 
 Rey...
 
 Rick Faircloth wrote:
  That's what's motivating the question.
  
  I'm trying to take Progressive Enhancement, as I see it, one step 
  further by integrating the enhancement into the server-side 
 process, 
  where possible and applicable.
  
  This part concerns return validation result messages back 
 to the form 
  page, or rather back to the page itself, since I'm 
 currently posting 
  the form back to the page its own.
  
  If JS is disabled, then I would simply have to refresh the page.
  If JS is enabled, then I could use taconite to place 
 messages on the 
  page without refresh...if I'm understanding everything correctly.
  
  Rick
  
 




[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-22 Thread Ariel Jakobovits

how about this:

WHEN THE USER FIRST LOGS IN:

cfset Session.isJSEnabled = 'no' // assume false for now


JAVASCRIPT ON PAGE:
---

var myUrl = 'http://myhost.com/someCFMfile.cfm'; // some URL pointing to the 
page as defined below

var ajaxSettings = {
type: 'GET',
url: myUrl ,
dataType: html,
   data: {isJSenabled: 'yes'}
};

jQuery(function () {
jQuery.ajax(ajaxSettings);
});



FILE ON SERVER (Cold Fusion example):

---
cfset Session.isJSEnabled = URL.isJSEnabled // now it is YES and you can use 
that later in generating pages


Basically, you fire off a message to the server saying that yes JS is enabled. 
Update the session, and use that from then on in your code.








[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-22 Thread Rick Faircloth

Thanks for the tip, Ariel.. I'll give that try!

Rick


-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ariel Jakobovits
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 8:18 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


how about this:

WHEN THE USER FIRST LOGS IN:

cfset Session.isJSEnabled = 'no' // assume false for now


JAVASCRIPT ON PAGE:
---

var myUrl = 'http://myhost.com/someCFMfile.cfm'; // some URL pointing to the
page as defined below

var ajaxSettings = {
type: 'GET',
url: myUrl ,
dataType: html,
   data: {isJSenabled: 'yes'}
};

jQuery(function () {
jQuery.ajax(ajaxSettings);
});



FILE ON SERVER (Cold Fusion example):

---
cfset Session.isJSEnabled = URL.isJSEnabled // now it is YES and you can
use that later in generating pages


Basically, you fire off a message to the server saying that yes JS is
enabled. Update the session, and use that from then on in your code.










[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-22 Thread Josh Nathanson



Basically, you fire off a message to the server saying that yes JS is
enabled. Update the session, and use that from then on in your code.


I am thinking of forking my application in one area where I want to handle 
things very differently depending on if someone has javascript enabled, and 
this is the method I think would work best.


The only possible downside would be if someone disables javascript in the 
middle of their session;  however I think the likelihood of that is pretty 
miniscule.  In this unlikely case, you could use a noscript tag to at least 
notify the user that their Javascript had been unexpectedly disabled, and 
how to rectify it.


-- Josh



[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-22 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II

Josh,

I am thinking of forking my application in one area where I want to handle
things very differently depending on if someone has javascript enabled, and
this is the method I think would work best.

The only possible downside would be if someone disables javascript in the
middle of their session;  however I think the likelihood of that is pretty
miniscule.  In this unlikely case, you could use a noscript tag to at least
notify the user that their Javascript had been unexpectedly disabled, and
how to rectify it.

Don't forget that any bugs that crop up in your JS can cause your JS not to
run--so while JS is enabled, JS errors could prevent code execution the way
you expect. The likely hood of this happening is increased when your JS is
created dynamically.

This is why, I like unobtrusive JS--because if the code doesn't run for any
reason, it's ok--you're still going to correct the behavior on the server.

-Dan

PS - Obviously there are times when you're trying to implement RIA and the
reliance on JS is nearly absolute to accomplish the task you want to do. I'm
just pointing out that even doing JS detection can be misleading on whether
or not the JS executed. 



[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-22 Thread Klaus Hartl


Dan G. Switzer, II schrieb:

meta http-equiv=refresh content=2;url=page.htm?js=false

script type=text/javascript
self.location = page.htm?js=true;
/script

In this example if JS is enabled, the JS code would be executed redirecting
the user to page w/a URL parameter indicating that JS was enabled. If the JS
code doesn't execute, then the meta refresh would take over.

However, I can't emphasis this enough, testing for JS is really unnecessary
for all the work you've been talking about. You keep saying you want to make
your code easier to manage and develop and detecting for JS in this case is
just adding more complexity. 


It's much easier to just write the JS and if it doesn't execute then let the
server-side code re-enforce the behavior.

The last time I wrote any kind of detection script, was for a project that
required Flash. It's been 9 years since I've written a script to detect for
JS--and that was because I didn't know better.



I second Dan. And the example above is one of the most annoying things 
you can do to a user: breaking the back button.



-- Klaus



[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-22 Thread Klaus Hartl


Klaus Hartl schrieb:


Dan G. Switzer, II schrieb:

meta http-equiv=refresh content=2;url=page.htm?js=false

script type=text/javascript
self.location = page.htm?js=true;
/script

In this example if JS is enabled, the JS code would be executed 
redirecting
the user to page w/a URL parameter indicating that JS was enabled. If 
the JS

code doesn't execute, then the meta refresh would take over.

However, I can't emphasis this enough, testing for JS is really 
unnecessary
for all the work you've been talking about. You keep saying you want 
to make
your code easier to manage and develop and detecting for JS in this 
case is

just adding more complexity.
It's much easier to just write the JS and if it doesn't execute then 
let the

server-side code re-enforce the behavior.

The last time I wrote any kind of detection script, was for a project 
that
required Flash. It's been 9 years since I've written a script to 
detect for

JS--and that was because I didn't know better.



I second Dan. And the example above is one of the most annoying things 
you can do to a user: breaking the back button.



PS: And even that method isn't fool-proof. You can always simply 
deactivate JS with two clicks when you're already on the page in question...




[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-22 Thread Klaus Hartl


Andy Matthews schrieb:

Simple way to do it might be to use javascript itself to do a forward or
something like that. I've seen people set up a meta refresh of 5 seconds in
the header, then use javascript to do a location.href as soon as the page
loads. If they have js, they get redirected immediately to page A, if they
don't, then after 5 seconds, they get redirected to page B.


You can still easily deactivate JS once you landed on page A...


-- Klaus


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-21 Thread Felix Geisendörfer


Detecting if JavaScript is enabled is actually fairly straightforward.
No need to make it so complicated.
Well I think this thread is about how to detect if JS is enabled on the 
Server-side ; ). Your method of course is the way to go if all one needs 
is to display a msg to the user.


-- Felix
--
http://www.thinkingphp.org
http://www.fg-webdesign.de


Giant Jam Sandwich wrote:

Detecting if JavaScript is enabled is actually fairly straightforward.
No need to make it so complicated.

$(function(){
   $(#is_disabled).css(display,none);
});

...

div id=is_disabledYou have JavaScript disabled./div

 
  


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-21 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II

   Detecting if JavaScript is enabled is actually fairly
straightforward.
   No need to make it so complicated.

Well I think this thread is about how to detect if JS is enabled on the
Server-side ; ). Your method of course is the way to go if all one needs is
to display a msg to the user.

It's also important to remember that there typically is no real reason you
even need to detect JavaScript. jQuery does an excellent job helping you
write unobtrusive JS, which allows you to add JS functionality, without
requiring that the user has JS for the site to still function.

-Dan



[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-21 Thread Rick Faircloth

Hi, Dan...

The only reason I'm interested in being able to determine
whether or not JS is enabled is that I'm trying to use JS
to place error messages back on a page via JS (Ajax)
after server-side validation.

What I'm trying to determine now that I've been working on
this approach (unsuccessfully so far) is if the messages can
be returned to a form page via Ajax if the form wasn't submitted
that way in the first place.

I just want server-side validation results displayed without
a page refresh...

Possible?

Rick

-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dan G. Switzer, II
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 8:53 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


   Detecting if JavaScript is enabled is actually fairly
straightforward.
   No need to make it so complicated.

Well I think this thread is about how to detect if JS is enabled on the
Server-side ; ). Your method of course is the way to go if all one needs is
to display a msg to the user.

It's also important to remember that there typically is no real reason you
even need to detect JavaScript. jQuery does an excellent job helping you
write unobtrusive JS, which allows you to add JS functionality, without
requiring that the user has JS for the site to still function.

-Dan





[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-21 Thread Rick Faircloth

Actually, I'm not trying to do just client-side validation... I've already
got that working by itself.  And I've got server-side working...been doing
that
for years.  Now, I'm trying to combine the two and run the client-side
validation,
then run the server-side validation and if there are any server-side errors
thrown,
pass the messages back to the form page via JS (Ajax)...

Rick

-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dan G. Switzer, II
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 9:30 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


Brian,

I would agree to some extent that it is not necessary to detect if
JavaScript is disabled. However, there are an abundance of (I do hate
saying this word) Web 2.0 sites in which it is impossible to use all
the features unless JavaScript is fully functioning. Sometimes it is
nice just to give the user a little message that lets them know they
might be missing something good ;)

I know for a fact what Rick's trying to do, it's totally unnecessary to
detect for JS. He's trying to do some very basic client-side validation.

-Dan





[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-21 Thread Rick Faircloth
Hi, all... the saga continues...

I'm so close, yet so far.

I think the problem is doc-type declarations.
No matter what I do, it creates one problem or another.

Now, as it is, the server-side works fine, but the client-side
is disabled.

Would someone please look at the attached code and
tell me what the problem is?

Slowly losing my mind...

Rick



-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Giant Jam Sandwich
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 9:01 AM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


Hi Felix,

Rick's original question didn't specify server side... I only skimmed
the messages thereafter, so that might have come out later in the
thread... me being lazy on a Saturday :)

@Dan

I would agree to some extent that it is not necessary to detect if
JavaScript is disabled. However, there are an abundance of (I do hate
saying this word) Web 2.0 sites in which it is impossible to use all
the features unless JavaScript is fully functioning. Sometimes it is
nice just to give the user a little message that lets them know they
might be missing something good ;)

Brian


On Apr 21, 8:43 am, Felix Geisendörfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Detecting if JavaScript is enabled is actually fairly straightforward.
  No need to make it so complicated.

 Well I think this thread is about how to detect if JS is enabled on the
 Server-side ; ). Your method of course is the way to go if all one needs
 is to display a msg to the user.

 -- Felix

--http://www.thinkingphp.orghttp://www.fg-webdesign.
de



 Giant Jam Sandwich wrote:
  Detecting if JavaScript is enabled is actually fairly straightforward.
  No need to make it so complicated.

  $(function(){
 $(#is_disabled).css(display,none);
  });

  ...

  div id=is_disabledYou have JavaScript disabled./div- Hide quoted
text -

 - Show quoted text -



Dual_Validation_Success.cfm
Description: Binary data


Dual_Validation_Form.cfm
Description: Binary data


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-21 Thread Rick Faircloth

Hi, all... the saga continues...

I'm so close, yet so far.

I think the problem is doc-type declarations.
No matter what I do, it creates one problem or another.

Now, as it is, the server-side works fine, but the client-side
is disabled.

Would someone please look at the attached code and
tell me what the problem is?

Slowly losing my mind...

Rick

PS - I tried attaching the docs to this email, but I guess
that's not allowed.

Here are links to the docs...

http://bodaford.whitestonemedia.com/html/dual_validation_form.cfm
http://bodaford.whitestonemedia.com/html/dual_validation_success.cfm

And you can see the running pages at:

http://bodaford.whitestonemedia.com/html/dual_validation_form.cfm



-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Giant Jam Sandwich
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 9:01 AM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


Hi Felix,

Rick's original question didn't specify server side... I only skimmed
the messages thereafter, so that might have come out later in the
thread... me being lazy on a Saturday :)






[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Scott Sauyet


Rick Faircloth wrote:

Is there a fool-proof way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled in their browser?


From the server side?  No.  From the client?  Just try it.

Often, the trick is to make the site function reasonably even if JS is 
off.  One ugly technique that I've used on occasion is to have an 
initial page with some JS that changes all links and forms to tell the 
server that from now on, it can assume that JS is on.  But if the user 
turns off JS in the middle of using my site, this fails miserably.  And 
if there are multiple entry points (bookmarks anyone?) it would have to 
be done on multiple pages.  It's not fun.  I suppose that AJAX-y methods 
would make this a bit easier now, but I would not ever recommend this 
technique.  Instead, I would simply make sure that the site works, even 
if more awkwardly, without JS and then have the JS dynamically make 
whatever changes are needed to make the pages sexier.


  -- Scott



[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rob Desbois

From where?

If javascript runs, they have it enabled - if it doesn't, they don't!

Are you wanting to pass this information to your server? Something like the
following should work for that:

a id='js_detect' href='/foo.php'Load/a
script type='text/javascript'!--
  $(document).ready(function() {
 var href = $(#js_detect).attr(href);
 href += ?javascript=true;
 $(#js_detect).attr(href, href);
  });
// --
/script

If the user doesn't have javascript or it's not enabled, the href won't be
changed.

HTH,
rob

On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Good morning, all...

Is there a fool-proof way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled in their browser?

Rick






--
Rob Desbois
Eml: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 01452 760631
Mob: 07946 705987
There's a whale there's a whale there's a whale fish he cried, and the
whale was in full view.
...Then ooh welcome. Ahhh. Ooh mug welcome.


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Andy Matthews

Simple way to do it might be to use javascript itself to do a forward or
something like that. I've seen people set up a meta refresh of 5 seconds in
the header, then use javascript to do a location.href as soon as the page
loads. If they have js, they get redirected immediately to page A, if they
don't, then after 5 seconds, they get redirected to page B.


Thoughts? 

-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 7:57 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?


Good morning, all...

Is there a fool-proof way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled in
their browser?

Rick





[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Mike Alsup


Well said, Dan.


On 4/20/07, Dan G. Switzer, II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

As discussed on another mailing list, there's no real need to detect if JS
is enabled. If you write unobtrusive JavaScript (which is what jQuery helps
you to do) if the user has JS disabled, things will continue to work.

There's no reason to have separate JS/non-JS pages in most cases--especially
for the kind of things you're working on.

That said, the most full proof way I'm aware of to test if JS is
enabled/disabled is driving traffic through a splash page which does a
redirect.

meta http-equiv=refresh content=2;url=page.htm?js=false

script type=text/javascript
self.location = page.htm?js=true;
/script

In this example if JS is enabled, the JS code would be executed redirecting
the user to page w/a URL parameter indicating that JS was enabled. If the JS
code doesn't execute, then the meta refresh would take over.

However, I can't emphasis this enough, testing for JS is really unnecessary
for all the work you've been talking about. You keep saying you want to make
your code easier to manage and develop and detecting for JS in this case is
just adding more complexity.

It's much easier to just write the JS and if it doesn't execute then let the
server-side code re-enforce the behavior.

The last time I wrote any kind of detection script, was for a project that
required Flash. It's been 9 years since I've written a script to detect for
JS--and that was because I didn't know better.

-Dan


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Andy Matthews

One thing to point out about mine and Dan's suggestion is that your Seach
engine ranking will take a hit if you use this method. Google penalizes
sites who use redirects to other pages.

Depending on why you need to check for JS, you might consider using this
method only for portions of the site which will not receive search engine
hits. Such as admin areas, online forms, etc. 

-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dan G. Switzer, II
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 8:16 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


Rick,

Good morning, all...

Is there a fool-proof way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled 
in their browser?

As discussed on another mailing list, there's no real need to detect if JS
is enabled. If you write unobtrusive JavaScript (which is what jQuery helps
you to do) if the user has JS disabled, things will continue to work.

There's no reason to have separate JS/non-JS pages in most cases--especially
for the kind of things you're working on.

That said, the most full proof way I'm aware of to test if JS is
enabled/disabled is driving traffic through a splash page which does a
redirect.

meta http-equiv=refresh content=2;url=page.htm?js=false

script type=text/javascript
self.location = page.htm?js=true;
/script

In this example if JS is enabled, the JS code would be executed redirecting
the user to page w/a URL parameter indicating that JS was enabled. If the JS
code doesn't execute, then the meta refresh would take over.

However, I can't emphasis this enough, testing for JS is really unnecessary
for all the work you've been talking about. You keep saying you want to make
your code easier to manage and develop and detecting for JS in this case is
just adding more complexity. 

It's much easier to just write the JS and if it doesn't execute then let the
server-side code re-enforce the behavior.

The last time I wrote any kind of detection script, was for a project that
required Flash. It's been 9 years since I've written a script to detect for
JS--and that was because I didn't know better.

-Dan




[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth

Hi, Dan... and thanks for the feedback...

What I would like to do is allow ColdFusion server-side
validation messages to be delivered back to the form page
via Ajax if JS is available and, if not, just refresh the page.

Isn't that what you do with this code is your
ex2.3_mailing_list_validation.cfm example for the
ex2_process.cfm page?

Rick

Your code:

!---// if this is an AJAX call, we must return JSON data //---
cfif structKeyExists(url, ajax) and url.ajax
!---// clear all generated data //---
cfcontent type=text/xml reset=true /
cfoutput{
success: #stAction.success#,
message: #jsStringFormat(stAction.message)# [AJAX]
}/cfoutput
cfexit method=exitTemplate /
cfelse
!---// reload mailing list page, which will show any errors //---
cfinclude template=#form.formUrl# /
cfexit method=exitTemplate /
/cfif





-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dan G. Switzer, II
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 9:16 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


Rick,

Good morning, all...

Is there a fool-proof way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled in their browser?

As discussed on another mailing list, there's no real need to detect if JS
is enabled. If you write unobtrusive JavaScript (which is what jQuery helps
you to do) if the user has JS disabled, things will continue to work.

There's no reason to have separate JS/non-JS pages in most cases--especially
for the kind of things you're working on.

That said, the most full proof way I'm aware of to test if JS is
enabled/disabled is driving traffic through a splash page which does a
redirect.

meta http-equiv=refresh content=2;url=page.htm?js=false

script type=text/javascript
self.location = page.htm?js=true;
/script

In this example if JS is enabled, the JS code would be executed redirecting
the user to page w/a URL parameter indicating that JS was enabled. If the JS
code doesn't execute, then the meta refresh would take over.

However, I can't emphasis this enough, testing for JS is really unnecessary
for all the work you've been talking about. You keep saying you want to make
your code easier to manage and develop and detecting for JS in this case is
just adding more complexity. 

It's much easier to just write the JS and if it doesn't execute then let the
server-side code re-enforce the behavior.

The last time I wrote any kind of detection script, was for a project that
required Flash. It's been 9 years since I've written a script to detect for
JS--and that was because I didn't know better.

-Dan





[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth
Thanks for the info, Rob.
 
The purpose here is to determine how my server-side form
validation results will be sent back to the form page.
 
If JS is enabled, then I can use Ajax to send them back,
if not, then the page will have to be refreshed.
 
This is very important for forms that are embedded in the
middle of a page where refreshing the page would cause
the user to have to scroll back down to the form to see the
results if a refresh is used.
 
Rick
 
 
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Desbois
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 9:14 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
 
From where?
If javascript runs, they have it enabled - if it doesn't, they don't!

Are you wanting to pass this information to your server? Something like the
following should work for that:

a id='js_detect' href='/foo.php'Load/a 
script type='text/javascript'!--
   $(document).ready(function() {
  var href = $(#js_detect).attr(href);
  href += ?javascript=true;
  $(#js_detect).attr(href, href); 
   });
// --
/script

If the user doesn't have javascript or it's not enabled, the href won't be
changed.

HTH,
rob
On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Good morning, all...

Is there a fool-proof way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled in their browser?

Rick





-- 
Rob Desbois
Eml: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 01452 760631
Mob: 07946 705987
There's a whale there's a whale there's a whale fish he cried, and the
whale was in full view.
...Then ooh welcome. Ahhh. Ooh mug welcome. 


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Klaus Hartl


Rick Faircloth schrieb:

If JS is enabled, then I can use Ajax to send them back,

if not, then the page will have to be refreshed.



If you use JavaScript in the sense of Progressive Enhancement, this 
should be no problem at all. First build your form working in the 
traditional way, afterwards you plug JavaScript on top and improve the 
user experience. In case JS is disabled, everything still works fine.



-- Klaus


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Scott Sauyet


Rick Faircloth wrote:

I'm trying to take Progressive Enhancement, as I see it,
one step further by integrating the enhancement into
the server-side process, where possible and applicable.


I think this is going to be difficult, if you are trying to drive it 
from the server-side.



This part concerns return validation result messages back to
the form page, or rather back to the page itself, since I'm currently
posting the form back to the page its own.

If JS is disabled, then I would simply have to refresh the page.
If JS is enabled, then I could use taconite to place messages
on the page without refresh...if I'm understanding everything correctly.


But the server is not choosing whether it can refresh part of a page. 
It's simply responding to a request.  If the request asks for the data 
needed to refresh part of the page, then it should send just that data. 
 If the request is a form submission, the browser won't be ready to 
handle just the validation data; it's expecting a whole page.  So the 
server must supply a whole page at that point.


It's relatively straightforward to progressively enhance the page to 
convert a submit form request into an initial AJAX validation request, 
followed by either error reporting or actual form submission.  The 
harder part is to determine how to deal with this server side. 
Basically, you want a component model server side that can do several 
different things dependent upon how the request is made:  serve the form 
as part of the initial page, serve the form back in the page with 
validation messages, or return the validation messages in response to an 
AJAX request.  My biggest question with my server-side code is how to 
make sure these three related tasks are handled efficiently without code 
duplication.


Cheers,

  -- Scott Sauyet



[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II

Rick,

That would work if the form were visible when the page is first opened,
(And I may have to go that route if what I'm trying doesn't work...),
but when the page is first opened, the form is invisible and a link has
to be clicked to even view the form.

So a named anchor wouldn't provide *exactly* what I'm looking for, but
may be a compromise.

Well, if you're doing that then you're requiring JS to even fill out the
form to begin with. 

If that's the case, then you can just use JS to show the form and move to
the anchor.

-Dan



[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II

Rick,

!---// if this is an AJAX call, we must return JSON data //---
cfif structKeyExists(url, ajax) and url.ajax
   !---// clear all generated data //---
   cfcontent type=text/xml reset=true /
   cfoutput{
   success: #stAction.success#,
   message: #jsStringFormat(stAction.message)# [AJAX]
   }/cfoutput
   cfexit method=exitTemplate /

Don't pay too much attention to the ex2_process.cfm in the example. It's
used for all of the ex2.1*.cfm templates.

For the ex2.3_mailing_list_validation.cfm example, the code above would
*never* be executed.

I just sent another message that hopefully will clear things up for you. 

-Dan



[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth

Thanks for the feedback, Rey.

I'm feel certain that the feedback I'm getting will be correct.

I just wanted to ask the questions to be sure.  Dan's demo code
caused me a lot of confusion, because it seemed to be doing exactly
what I'm looking for.

I'll try one more approach and that is (as I've done already) to display
server-side validation messages via taconite, but if that should fail (and
I'll
have to figure out some way to flag that failure) have CF goes ahead
and display the messages as I've done for years.

I'm sure you can all excuse a newbie to JS in general and jQuery in
particular
for exploring the boundaries of what is possible!  :o)

Thanks for your patience.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rey Bango
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 10:35 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


Hi Rick,

Let me summarize what everyone is saying before this turns into a long 
thread.

Basically, there's no easy and surefire way of determining if JS is 
enabled on the browser. You need to code your forms and pages in the 
traditional way that you would any non-JS application. Once you have 
those pages working correctly with proper server-side validation and 
handling, then you can look at progressive enhancement to extend the 
functionality of your pages by leveraging JS, DOM-manipulation and Ajax.

I realize that you're trying to find a way of doing this from a 
server-side perspective but you're going to end up building a 
hodge-podge solution that will not be effective. You have some really 
sharp people giving you the right advice and since I want you to be 
successful, I highly recommend that you follow their suggestions.

This is the *only* surefire way of ensuring that browsers that have JS 
disabled will work properly on your site. Otherwise, its a shot in the dark.

Rey...

Rick Faircloth wrote:
 That's what's motivating the question.
 
 I'm trying to take Progressive Enhancement, as I see it,
 one step further by integrating the enhancement into
 the server-side process, where possible and applicable.
 
 This part concerns return validation result messages back to
 the form page, or rather back to the page itself, since I'm currently
 posting the form back to the page its own.
 
 If JS is disabled, then I would simply have to refresh the page.
 If JS is enabled, then I could use taconite to place messages
 on the page without refresh...if I'm understanding everything correctly.
 
 Rick
 




[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II

Rick,

Isn't that what you do with this code is your
ex2.3_mailing_list_validation.cfm example for the
ex2_process.cfm page?

Since it's obvious that you've downloaded my presentation, I need to point
out that some of the things in the demo are bad concepts, but I did them to
show the progression of how you get from point A to point D.

For example, the ex2.4_mailing_list_ajax.cfm is a horrible idea for
validation. For my presentation though, I wanted to isolate the portion that
should how one could validate against server-side lookups.

The final goal was to get to ex2.5_mailing_list_validation_ajax.cfm. This
template shows using pure client-side validation to validate absolutely
everything you could on the client-side, while using AJAX only when you
couldn't validate w/out looking something up on the server.

It also shows how all the JS code in unobtrusive and the form still works
without JS.

So, whatever you do, you should not use ex2.4_mailing_list_ajax.cfm as a
model for validation--it would be taken out of context and be a very bad
implementation.

For those of you interested in the presentation files, you can download it
here:

http://blog.pengoworks.com/blogger/index.cfm?action=blog:585

-Dan



[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth

 That page has no AJAX based validation. I also do no JS detection. The
code
 is set up so that if JS is unavailable, the form just works.

I got that, but the code seems to test for Ajax availability, and if there's
been an
Ajax call, it responds with messages via Ajax.

If the call was not via Ajax, then the validation responses are returned via
template inclusion, rather than refresh, which worked for the purposes of
your demo,
but I'm not sure how that technique would work on a real website.

But if I'm wrong about my explanation above, please explain to me what your
code does:

!---// if this is an AJAX call, we must return JSON data //---
cfif structKeyExists(url, ajax) and url.ajax
!---// clear all generated data //---
cfcontent type=text/xml reset=true /
cfoutput{
success: #stAction.success#,
message: #jsStringFormat(stAction.message)# [AJAX]
}/cfoutput
cfexit method=exitTemplate /





-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dan G. Switzer, II
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 10:07 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


Rick,

Isn't that what you do with this code is your
ex2.3_mailing_list_validation.cfm example for the
ex2_process.cfm page?

That page has no AJAX based validation. I also do no JS detection. The code
is set up so that if JS is unavailable, the form just works.

-Dan





[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II

Rick,

Isn't that what you do with this code is your
ex2.3_mailing_list_validation.cfm example for the
ex2_process.cfm page?

That page has no AJAX based validation. I also do no JS detection. The code
is set up so that if JS is unavailable, the form just works.

-Dan



[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Andy Matthews

Beat me to it. 

-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andy Matthews
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 8:19 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


Simple way to do it might be to use javascript itself to do a forward or
something like that. I've seen people set up a meta refresh of 5 seconds in
the header, then use javascript to do a location.href as soon as the page
loads. If they have js, they get redirected immediately to page A, if they
don't, then after 5 seconds, they get redirected to page B.


Thoughts? 

-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 7:57 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?


Good morning, all...

Is there a fool-proof way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled in
their browser?

Rick






[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth

Thanks for pointing that out, Andy.

That's important for me to know, because I not
only design and develop sites for clients, more and more
are asking me to perform SEO/SEM for them and I don't
want to hurt their rankings, for sure!

Rick


-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andy Matthews
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 9:37 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


One thing to point out about mine and Dan's suggestion is that your Seach
engine ranking will take a hit if you use this method. Google penalizes
sites who use redirects to other pages.

Depending on why you need to check for JS, you might consider using this
method only for portions of the site which will not receive search engine
hits. Such as admin areas, online forms, etc. 

-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dan G. Switzer, II
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 8:16 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


Rick,

Good morning, all...

Is there a fool-proof way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled 
in their browser?

As discussed on another mailing list, there's no real need to detect if JS
is enabled. If you write unobtrusive JavaScript (which is what jQuery helps
you to do) if the user has JS disabled, things will continue to work.

There's no reason to have separate JS/non-JS pages in most cases--especially
for the kind of things you're working on.

That said, the most full proof way I'm aware of to test if JS is
enabled/disabled is driving traffic through a splash page which does a
redirect.

meta http-equiv=refresh content=2;url=page.htm?js=false

script type=text/javascript
self.location = page.htm?js=true;
/script

In this example if JS is enabled, the JS code would be executed redirecting
the user to page w/a URL parameter indicating that JS was enabled. If the JS
code doesn't execute, then the meta refresh would take over.

However, I can't emphasis this enough, testing for JS is really unnecessary
for all the work you've been talking about. You keep saying you want to make
your code easier to manage and develop and detecting for JS in this case is
just adding more complexity. 

It's much easier to just write the JS and if it doesn't execute then let the
server-side code re-enforce the behavior.

The last time I wrote any kind of detection script, was for a project that
required Flash. It's been 9 years since I've written a script to detect for
JS--and that was because I didn't know better.

-Dan






[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Scott Sauyet


Rick Faircloth wrote:
The simplest 
thing is just to add a post parameter that says ajaxOn=true or some 
such, then check for that server-side.  It wasn't included in the HTML, 
or it was set to false, so if it's true, the server knows to respond 
with an AJAX request.  It's pretty straightforward.


Well, then, wouldn't that amount to a fool-proof test that Ajax is available
for the server to use as a response mechanism?


Yes, that's what a number of people have been trying to tell you.  There 
is no useful way for the server side to determine if JS is on, but the 
client side can easily *tell* that to the server side.



And I assume by add a post parameter, you mean a hidden field in the
form or somewhere in the JS code on the calling page with a variable?


Yes, although it could also be done through a parameter added to the 
query string or the URL, depending upon how you want to handle it server 
side.  But the other option, suggested on this thread, to use the HTTP 
header HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH  means no extra work in the JS, and is 
probably a better idea, as long as you are sure you will be using JQuery 
for a while.


Good luck,

  -- Scott




[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth

The only question now is whether or not
HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH is compatible
with ColdFusion 4.5...

 the client side can easily *tell* that to the server side

It doesn't really matter how the server-side knows, as long as it knows :o)

And a question about adding it to a URL... how does the client-side page
determine whether JS is available or not before any code is executed?
What's
the means of determine wither to add .cfm?Ajax=False or .cfm?Ajax=True ?



-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott Sauyet
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 11:50 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


Rick Faircloth wrote:
 The simplest 
 thing is just to add a post parameter that says ajaxOn=true or some 
 such, then check for that server-side.  It wasn't included in the HTML, 
 or it was set to false, so if it's true, the server knows to respond 
 with an AJAX request.  It's pretty straightforward.
 
 Well, then, wouldn't that amount to a fool-proof test that Ajax is
available
 for the server to use as a response mechanism?

Yes, that's what a number of people have been trying to tell you.  There 
is no useful way for the server side to determine if JS is on, but the 
client side can easily *tell* that to the server side.

 And I assume by add a post parameter, you mean a hidden field in the
 form or somewhere in the JS code on the calling page with a variable?

Yes, although it could also be done through a parameter added to the 
query string or the URL, depending upon how you want to handle it server 
side.  But the other option, suggested on this thread, to use the HTTP 
header HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH  means no extra work in the JS, and is 
probably a better idea, as long as you are sure you will be using JQuery 
for a while.

Good luck,

   -- Scott






[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Priest, James \(NIH/NIEHS\) [C]

 -Original Message-
 From: Scott Sauyet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 header HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH  means no extra work in the JS, and is 
 probably a better idea, as long as you are sure you will be 
 using JQuery 

This sounds like the best way - I think you were using CF right?  Maybe
try:  GetHttpRequestData

Description
Makes HTTP request headers and body available to CFML pages. Useful for
capturing SOAP request data, which can be delivered in an HTTP header.

As far as populating the hidden form field - I got this code from Dan's
autocomplete example:


function findValue(li) {
if( li == null ) return alert(No matching records found!);
// if coming from an AJAX call, let's use the CityId as the
value
if( !!li.extra ) var sValue = li.extra[0];
// otherwise, let's just display the value in the text box
else var sValue = li.selectValue;
  // write the id to a hidden field
$(#public_id).val(sValue);
}

It's basically looking for a value in a list and assigning that to my
field (public_id)

Jim


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth

Gotcha...

(Hopefully it's compatible with CF 4.5!)

Your approach looks like what Dan did in his presentation code:

cfif structKeyExists(url, ajax) and url.ajax

Checking for the ajax variable in the url struct... at least that's how
I'm understand it...



-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 11:56 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


 -Original Message-
 From: Scott Sauyet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 header HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH  means no extra work in the JS, and is 
 probably a better idea, as long as you are sure you will be 
 using JQuery 

This sounds like the best way - I think you were using CF right?  Maybe
try:  GetHttpRequestData

Description
Makes HTTP request headers and body available to CFML pages. Useful for
capturing SOAP request data, which can be delivered in an HTTP header.

As far as populating the hidden form field - I got this code from Dan's
autocomplete example:


function findValue(li) {
if( li == null ) return alert(No matching records found!);
// if coming from an AJAX call, let's use the CityId as the
value
if( !!li.extra ) var sValue = li.extra[0];
// otherwise, let's just display the value in the text box
else var sValue = li.selectValue;
  // write the id to a hidden field
$(#public_id).val(sValue);
}

It's basically looking for a value in a list and assigning that to my
field (public_id)

Jim




[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Priest, James \(NIH/NIEHS\) [C]

 -Original Message-
 From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:00 PM


 (Hopefully it's compatible with CF 4.5!)

Unfortunately it looks like it was introduced in v5:

http://www.actcfug.com/files/cfmlhistory/functions/gethttprequestdata.ht
m

You need to put down the Ajax and upgrade your CF :)

Jim


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth

Waiting for CF 8...


-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:52 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


 -Original Message-
 From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:00 PM


 (Hopefully it's compatible with CF 4.5!)

Unfortunately it looks like it was introduced in v5:

http://www.actcfug.com/files/cfmlhistory/functions/gethttprequestdata.ht
m

You need to put down the Ajax and upgrade your CF :)

Jim




[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Aaron Heimlich

In the meantime, I suppose you could use JavaScript to append a variable to
the URL, and then have your CF decide what to send based on the presence of
that variable. Example:

html

script type=text/javascript
   $(function() {
   var $exampleForm = $(#exampleForm);
   var oldAction = $exampleForm.attr(action);
   $exampleForm.attr(action, oldAction + ?isAjax=true);
   });
/script

form id=exampleForm action=example.cfm
   !-- Form fields go here --
/form

/html

For the form is initially hidden thing, you could use JavaScript to hide
the form in a $(document).ready() function. That way people without JS see
the form, and people with JS see what you originally wanted them to.

On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Waiting for CF 8...


-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:52 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?


 -Original Message-
 From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:00 PM


 (Hopefully it's compatible with CF 4.5!)

Unfortunately it looks like it was introduced in v5:

http://www.actcfug.com/files/cfmlhistory/functions/gethttprequestdata.ht
m

You need to put down the Ajax and upgrade your CF :)

Jim






--
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth
Looks good.. let's make sure I understand.
 
So if JS is enabled, the script will run, appending
?isAjax=true to whatever page is specified if my
form's action page. correct?
 
Rick
 
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aaron Heimlich
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 1:22 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
 
In the meantime, I suppose you could use JavaScript to append a variable to
the URL, and then have your CF decide what to send based on the presence of
that variable. Example:

html

script type=text/javascript 
$(function() {
var $exampleForm = $(#exampleForm);
var oldAction = $exampleForm.attr(action);
$exampleForm.attr(action, oldAction + ?isAjax=true); 
});
/script

form id=exampleForm action=example.cfm
!-- Form fields go here --
/form

/html

For the form is initially hidden thing, you could use JavaScript to hide
the form in a $(document).ready() function. That way people without JS see
the form, and people with JS see what you originally wanted them to. 
On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Waiting for CF 8...


-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery-en@googlegroups.com
mailto:jquery-en@googlegroups.com ] On
Behalf Of Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:52 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript 
enabled?


 -Original Message-
 From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:00 PM


 (Hopefully it's compatible with CF 4.5!)

Unfortunately it looks like it was introduced in v5:

http://www.actcfug.com/files/cfmlhistory/functions/gethttprequestdata.ht 
m

You need to put down the Ajax and upgrade your CF :)

Jim





-- 
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com 


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Felix Geisendörfer
Didn't read the entire thread but appending parameters like this to an 
url just doesn't seem right to me.


Maybe your problem can be solved by looking if the client sent a 
X-Requested-With == 'XMLHttpRequest' header. That's how we in CakePHP 
find out if a page was requested via Ajax or not ; ).


Note: This is nothing the XMLHttpRequest adds itself, but I know jQuery 
and also Prototype do it for all their ajax requests for you.


-- Felix
--
http://www.thinkingphp.org
http://www.fg-webdesign.de


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Aaron Heimlich

On 4/20/07, Felix Geisendörfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Didn't read the entire thread but appending parameters like this to an
url just doesn't seem right to me.



I would normally agree, but Rick is using ColdFusion 4.5, which apparently
isn't capable of inspecting HTTP Headers.

--
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Aaron Heimlich

On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


$(document).ready()(function { \n



Should be:

$(document).ready(function() {
   // stuff goes here...
});

--
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth
That was the problem. now I'm getting the Query String.
 
Now I've got see if I can make all of this work.
 
Thanks!
 
Rick
 
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aaron Heimlich
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 3:37 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
 
On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$(document).ready()(function { \n

Should be:

$(document).ready(function() {
// stuff goes here...
});

-- 
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com 


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth
Question:
 
What typically causes the Firebug message
The XML file does not appear to have any style information
associated with it.  The document tree is shown below.
to display?
 
I have hunted for this problem forever and can't see what's wrong.
 
I'll provide code, but I just thought there might be something that's
usually wrong when this pops up.
 
Rick
 
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 4:09 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
 
That was the problem. now I'm getting the Query String.
 
Now I've got see if I can make all of this work.
 
Thanks!
 
Rick
 
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aaron Heimlich
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 3:37 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
 
On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$(document).ready()(function { \n

Should be:

$(document).ready(function() {
// stuff goes here...
});

-- 
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com 


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Aaron Heimlich

On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


The XML file does not appear to have any style information

associated with it.  The document tree is shown below.



This is what FireFOX (not Firebug) does when you browse to an XML file that
isn't using any XSLT stylesheets (and I would guess CSS as well, but I
dunno). Seeing this doesn't necessarily mean that something went wrong,
though (unless you're actually trying to use XSLT or something).

Is the page in question supposed to return XML? If not, you should be sure
that you're sending the appropriate Content-Type for whatever that page
should be sending.

--
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth
Thanks for the feedback, Aaron.  I'm trying to integrate
the whole validation scheme into one page.  I'm following
an example given to me that does work, but using my own
code, of course.
 
I've got something wrong somewhere.  I'll tinker some more
and then if I can't figure it out, I'll post some code.
 
Thanks for the tip. at least now I have some idea of what
to look for!
 
Rick
 
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aaron Heimlich
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:23 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
 
On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The XML file does not appear to have any style information
associated with it.  The document tree is shown below.

This is what FireFOX (not Firebug) does when you browse to an XML file that
isn't using any XSLT stylesheets (and I would guess CSS as well, but I
dunno). Seeing this doesn't necessarily mean that something went wrong,
though (unless you're actually trying to use XSLT or something). 

Is the page in question supposed to return XML? If not, you should be sure
that you're sending the appropriate Content-Type for whatever that page
should be sending.

-- 
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com 


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth
Is it possible to submit a page back to itself using a regular
submit button, then process the data from the form using
taconite commands?
 
I've run into a dead end. I can't seem to figure out how to
submit a form with a regular submit button and then have
taconite handle the data that comes back to the page.
 
I'm using the script I was given to attach ?isAjax=true to my
URL, and I was thinking that all I had to do was use taconite's
replaceContent command to place the error messages back
on the page with the form without refreshing the page.
 
I've been thinking about this so long, I think I'm having a brain cramp.
 
The problem seems to be that with a regular submission, I can't get
the data being returned to the page in the xml format so taconite
can parse it.
 
I was given an example where all validation (no server-side validation) was
done
on a single page.  The page was wrapped by:
 
CFIF IsDefined(Form.Fieldnames)
 
 CFINCLUDE for cf processing of data
 
 CFCONTENT type=text/html reset=yes
 CFHEADER name=Content-Type value=text/xml
 
 CFOUTPUT
 
oTaconite replaceContent for selects
 
 /CFOUTPUT
 
CFELSE
 
 HTML xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
 HEAD
 META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
/
 BODY
 
 Now the actual page content. scripts, including one that posts back to
the
 same page ( I guess this is the Ajax post. $.post(CalcTest.cfm,
Params); ),
 then the body, including the form (no submit button, everything is
posted on blur)
 
 /BODY
 /HTML
 
/CFIF
 
The CFIF wrap of the page seems to prevent the return of non-xml data to the
taconite plug-in, preventing what I'm getting now. XML Parsing Error: not
well-formed.
 
Am I just missing something or is it impossible to do this sort of
thing at all if server-side processing is involved?
 
I guess the question I have to have answered now is whether or not data can
be
sent back to the page that posted it in a form that the taconite plug-in can
process it,
if the data wasn't sent via Ajax from the page to begin with.
 
Forgive me if this doesn't make any sense. it's not making much right now to
me, either.
 
I'm about ready to call it quits on client-side validation.  I'm not sure
it's worth all this
trouble since server-side validation has to be performed anyway.
 
Rick
 
 
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:55 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
 
Thanks for the feedback, Aaron.  I'm trying to integrate
the whole validation scheme into one page.  I'm following
an example given to me that does work, but using my own
code, of course.
 
I've got something wrong somewhere.  I'll tinker some more
and then if I can't figure it out, I'll post some code.
 
Thanks for the tip. at least now I have some idea of what
to look for!
 
Rick
 
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aaron Heimlich
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:23 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
 
On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The XML file does not appear to have any style information
associated with it.  The document tree is shown below.

This is what FireFOX (not Firebug) does when you browse to an XML file that
isn't using any XSLT stylesheets (and I would guess CSS as well, but I
dunno). Seeing this doesn't necessarily mean that something went wrong,
though (unless you're actually trying to use XSLT or something). 

Is the page in question supposed to return XML? If not, you should be sure
that you're sending the appropriate Content-Type for whatever that page
should be sending.

-- 
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com 


[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Aaron Heimlich

Show me exactly what XML you are attempting to return, I'm semi-familiar
with Taconite so I should be able to make some sense of it. Also, I'm no CF
whiz, but this doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me

   CFCONTENT type=text/html reset=yes

CFHEADER name=Content-Type value=text/xml


From what I understand from the ColdFusion 4.5 CFML Reference[1],

CFCONTENT sets the Content-Type of the page, and the CFHEADER tag you're
using is doing the same thing.

Try this, though (be warned, I have *very* limited knowledge of CF)

CFIF IsDefined(URL.isAjax)

CFINCLUDE for cf processing of data

CFHEADER name=Content-Type value=text/xml

CFOUTPUT
taconite
!-- your taconite stuff here --
/taconite
/CFOUTPUT

CFELSE

HTML xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml

HEAD

META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
/

BODY

Now the actual page content… scripts, including one that posts back to
the

same page ( I guess this is the Ajax post… $.post(CalcTest.cfm,
Params); ),

then the body, including the form (no submit button, everything is
posted on blur)

/BODY

/HTML

/CFIF

[1]
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/documentation/en/coldfusion/452/45langref.pdf

On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Is it possible to submit a page back to itself using a regular

submit button, then process the data from the form using

taconite commands?



I've run into a dead end… I can't seem to figure out how to

submit a form with a regular submit button and then have

taconite handle the data that comes back to the page.



I'm using the script I was given to attach ?isAjax=true to my

URL, and I was thinking that all I had to do was use taconite's

replaceContent command to place the error messages back

on the page with the form without refreshing the page.



I've been thinking about this so long, I think I'm having a brain cramp.



The problem seems to be that with a regular submission, I can't get

the data being returned to the page in the xml format so taconite

can parse it.



I was given an example where all validation (no server-side validation)
was done

on a single page.  The page was wrapped by:



CFIF IsDefined(Form.Fieldnames)



 CFINCLUDE for cf processing of data



 CFCONTENT type=text/html reset=yes

 CFHEADER name=Content-Type value=text/xml



 CFOUTPUT



oTaconite replaceContent for selects



 /CFOUTPUT



CFELSE



 HTML xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml

 HEAD

 META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
/

 BODY



 Now the actual page content… scripts, including one that posts back
to the

 same page ( I guess this is the Ajax post… $.post(CalcTest.cfm,
Params); ),

 then the body, including the form (no submit button, everything is
posted on blur)



 /BODY

 /HTML



/CFIF



The CFIF wrap of the page seems to prevent the return of non-xml data to
the

taconite plug-in, preventing what I'm getting now… XML Parsing Error: not
well-formed…



Am I just missing something or is it impossible to do this sort of

thing at all if server-side processing is involved?



I guess the question I have to have answered now is whether or not data
can be

sent back to the page that posted it in a form that the taconite plug-in
can process it,

if the data wasn't sent via Ajax from the page to begin with.



Forgive me if this doesn't make any sense… it's not making much right now
to me, either.



I'm about ready to call it quits on client-side validation.  I'm not sure
it's worth all this

trouble since server-side validation has to be performed anyway…



Rick





*From:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Rick Faircloth
*Sent:* Friday, April 20, 2007 6:55 PM
*To:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?



Thanks for the feedback, Aaron…  I'm trying to integrate

the whole validation scheme into one page.  I'm following

an example given to me that does work, but using my own

code, of course.



I've got something wrong somewhere.  I'll tinker some more

and then if I can't figure it out, I'll post some code.



Thanks for the tip… at least now I have some idea of what

to look for!



Rick



*From:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Aaron Heimlich
*Sent:* Friday, April 20, 2007 6:23 PM
*To:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?



On 4/20/07, *Rick Faircloth* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The XML file does not appear to have any style information

associated with it.  The document tree is shown below.


This is what FireFOX (not Firebug) does when you browse to an XML file
that isn't using any XSLT stylesheets (and I would guess CSS as well, but I
dunno). Seeing this doesn't necessarily mean that something

[jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript enabled?

2007-04-20 Thread Rick Faircloth
Let me rewrite and rearrange the code and I'll
show it to you tomorrow and see what you think.
 
Thanks for your input and help, Aaron.
 
Time for some sleep!
 
Rick
 
 
 
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aaron Heimlich
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 10:47 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
 
Show me exactly what XML you are attempting to return, I'm semi-familiar
with Taconite so I should be able to make some sense of it. Also, I'm no CF
whiz, but this doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me

CFCONTENT type=text/html reset=yes  

 CFHEADER name=Content-Type value=text/xml

From what I understand from the ColdFusion 4.5 CFML Reference[1],
CFCONTENT sets the Content-Type of the page, and the CFHEADER tag you're
using is doing the same thing. 

Try this, though (be warned, I have *very* limited knowledge of CF)

CFIF IsDefined(URL.isAjax)

 CFINCLUDE for cf processing of data  

 CFHEADER name=Content-Type value=text/xml 

 CFOUTPUT
 taconite
 !-- your taconite stuff here --
 /taconite 
 /CFOUTPUT 

CFELSE

 HTML xmlns= http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml  

 HEAD  

 META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
/  

 BODY 

 Now the actual page content. scripts, including one that posts back to
the  

 same page ( I guess this is the Ajax post. $.post(CalcTest.cfm,
Params); ),  

 then the body, including the form (no submit button, everything is
posted on blur) 

 /BODY  

 /HTML

/CFIF

[1]
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/documentation/en/coldfusion/452/45langref
.pdf 
On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
Is it possible to submit a page back to itself using a regular
submit button, then process the data from the form using
taconite commands?
 
I've run into a dead end. I can't seem to figure out how to
submit a form with a regular submit button and then have
taconite handle the data that comes back to the page.
 
I'm using the script I was given to attach ?isAjax=true to my
URL, and I was thinking that all I had to do was use taconite's
replaceContent command to place the error messages back
on the page with the form without refreshing the page.
 
I've been thinking about this so long, I think I'm having a brain cramp.
 
The problem seems to be that with a regular submission, I can't get
the data being returned to the page in the xml format so taconite
can parse it.
 
I was given an example where all validation (no server-side validation) was
done
on a single page.  The page was wrapped by:
 
CFIF IsDefined(Form.Fieldnames)
 
 CFINCLUDE for cf processing of data
 
 CFCONTENT type=text/html reset=yes
 CFHEADER name=Content-Type value=text/xml
 
 CFOUTPUT
 
oTaconite  replaceContent for selects
 
 /CFOUTPUT
 
CFELSE
 
 HTML xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
 HEAD
 META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
/
 BODY
 
 Now the actual page content. scripts, including one that posts back to
the
 same page ( I guess this is the Ajax post. $.post(CalcTest.cfm,
Params); ),
 then the body, including the form (no submit button, everything is
posted on blur)
 
 /BODY
 /HTML
 
/CFIF
 
The CFIF wrap of the page seems to prevent the return of non-xml data to the
taconite plug-in, preventing what I'm getting now. XML Parsing Error: not
well-formed.
 
Am I just missing something or is it impossible to do this sort of
thing at all if server-side processing is involved?
 
I guess the question I have to have answered now is whether or not data can
be
sent back to the page that posted it in a form that the taconite plug-in can
process it,
if the data wasn't sent via Ajax from the page to begin with.
 
Forgive me if this doesn't make any sense. it's not making much right now to
me, either.
 
I'm about ready to call it quits on client-side validation.  I'm not sure
it's worth all this
trouble since server-side validation has to be performed anyway.
 
Rick
 
 
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:55 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
 
Thanks for the feedback, Aaron.  I'm trying to integrate
the whole validation scheme into one page.  I'm following
an example given to me that does work, but using my own
code, of course.
 
I've got something wrong somewhere.  I'll tinker some more
and then if I can't figure it out, I'll post some code.
 
Thanks for the tip. at least now I have some idea of what
to look for!
 
Rick
 
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aaron Heimlich
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:23 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript