[julia-users] Re: Error installing Atom.jl package
Consider posting at http://discuss.junolab.org/
On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 12:46:15 PM UTC-4, Joachim Inkmann wrote:
>
> Good day,
>
> I am new to Julia. I have installed Julia v0.50 and the latest version of
> Atom on a Windows 7 computer. The uber-juno package is installed as well.
> When I try to run Julia within Atom, I get the following error message:
>
>
>
> and a pop-up window showing the following
>
>
>
> When I try to run Pkg.add("Atom") in a terminal, I get the following error
> message:
>
>
>
> Does anyone have an idea what I could do to solve this problem? Thanks a
> lot.
>
> Regards, Joachim
>
Re: [julia-users] [ANNOUNCE] TestSetExtensions.jl
My biggest problem with Base.Test is that you can't individually select
which testsets you want to run
i.e. Pkg.test("MyModule","Set1")
which makes testing really annoying.
This package addresses this issue (albeit a little differently)
I do believe having a more featured Base.Test with a few more batteries
included is an overall boon.
On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 12:25:47 PM UTC-4, Spencer Russell wrote:
>
> I'm not planning on merging this functionality into Base.Test. I think
> it's nice to keep Base.Test pretty minimal but extensible, and then have
> extra functionality provided via packages so they're easier for the
> community to iterate on and contribute to.
>
> -s
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016, at 02:17 AM, mmus wrote:
>
> Will these improvements make into Base.Test ?
>
> On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 12:53:37 AM UTC-4, Spencer Russell wrote:
>
> I think in general the culture in the Julia community is very pro-testing,
> which I really appreciate. I saw your post recently about PyTest, but I’m
> generally pretty happy with the built-in `@testset` / `@test` system, and
> just wanted some lightweight convenience functionality that wouldn’t
> require people to restructure their existing tests.
>
> -s
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2016, at 4:30 AM, pdo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hey Spencer,
>
> I like this!
>
> I have recently started a testing-related package as well, maybe you've
> noticed (https://github.com/pdobacz/PyTest.jl). It seems that both
> packages could work together and complement quite seamlessly, so I'll
> definitely give yours a try.
>
> BTW, do you think there is much demand for Julia testing tools?
>
>
>
Re: [julia-users] [ANNOUNCE] TestSetExtensions.jl
Will these improvements make into Base.Test ? On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 12:53:37 AM UTC-4, Spencer Russell wrote: > > I think in general the culture in the Julia community is very pro-testing, > which I really appreciate. I saw your post recently about PyTest, but I’m > generally pretty happy with the built-in `@testset` / `@test` system, and > just wanted some lightweight convenience functionality that wouldn’t > require people to restructure their existing tests. > > -s > > > On Oct 29, 2016, at 4:30 AM, pdo...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hey Spencer, > > I like this! > > I have recently started a testing-related package as well, maybe you've > noticed (https://github.com/pdobacz/PyTest.jl). It seems that both > packages could work together and complement quite seamlessly, so I'll > definitely give yours a try. > > BTW, do you think there is much demand for Julia testing tools? > > >
[julia-users] Re: ANN: Symata.jl
Very cool. Great work.
Out of curiosity is the plan to implement all the sympy functions in the
Julia in the future?
On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 4:01:15 PM UTC-4, lapeyre@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Symata.jl is a symbolic math language. (The old name was SJulia.)
>
> You can add it with Pkg.add("Symata.jl"). The site is
> https://github.com/jlapeyre/Symata.jl
>
> Notebook examples are here
> https://github.com/jlapeyre/Symata.jl/tree/master/examples
> (the math looks better in live Jupyter sessions)
>
> To try the latest features, you need to use the development version using
> Pkg.checkout("Symata") after adding it.
>
> Among the New Things:
>
> * Builds and tests on Linux, OSX, and Windows using Travis and Appveyor.
>
> * Installation is much easier, using Steven Johnson's PyCall recipes.
>
> * Works in Jupyter notebook using IJulia.jl (It typesets the math using
> LaTeX). Symata still works at the command line REPL as well.
>
> * A few tutorial notebooks are included. They cover a small fraction of
> Symata.
>
> * ... oh, and rudimentary plotting via Plots.jl. This could be expanded
> with little effort.
>
> Please file an issue on github, https://github.com/jlapeyre/Symata.jl, if
> you have any problems or suggestions.
>
>
>
>
>
>
[julia-users] building Julia, cross compile using WSL
I'm trying to build a cross compiled version for Windows using Windows Subsystem For Ubuntu $ git status On branch master Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'. commit 683945155c64b8b68bf03d768745d650d4df142a $ cat Make.user override XC_HOST = x86_64-w64-mingw32 I get the following wine errors? x86_64-w64-mingw32-ar: creating libspqr.a a - spqr_rmap.o a - SuiteSparseQR_C.o a - SuiteSparseQR_expert.o a - spqr_parallel.o a - spqr_kernel.o a - spqr_analyze.o a - spqr_assemble.o a - spqr_cpack.o a - spqr_csize.o a - spqr_fcsize.o a - spqr_debug.o a - spqr_front.o a - spqr_factorize.o a - spqr_freenum.o a - spqr_freesym.o a - spqr_freefac.o a - spqr_fsize.o a - spqr_maxcolnorm.o a - spqr_rconvert.o a - spqr_rcount.o a - spqr_rhpack.o a - spqr_rsolve.o a - spqr_stranspose1.o a - spqr_stranspose2.o a - spqr_hpinv.o a - spqr_1fixed.o a - spqr_1colamd.o a - SuiteSparseQR.o a - spqr_1factor.o a - spqr_cumsum.o a - spqr_shift.o a - spqr_happly.o a - spqr_panel.o a - spqr_happly_work.o a - SuiteSparseQR_qmult.o a - spqr_trapezoidal.o a - spqr_larftb.o a - spqr_append.o a - spqr_type.o a - spqr_tol.o PERL base/pcre_h.jl PERL base/errno_h.jl CC usr/bin/libccalltest.dll PERL base/fenv_constants.jl PERL base/file_constants.jl PERL base/uv_constants.jl PERL base/build_h.jl.phony CC src/support/hashing.o PERL base/version_git.jl.phony CC src/support/timefuncs.o CC src/support/ptrhash.o CC src/support/operators.o CC src/support/utf8.o CC src/support/ios.o CC src/support/htable.o CC src/support/bitvector.o CC src/support/int2str.o timefuncs.c: In function 'jl_gettimeofday': timefuncs.c:35:20: warning: implicit declaration of function '_ftime64_s' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] errno_t code = _ftime64_s(); ^~ CC src/support/libsupportinit.o CC src/support/arraylist.o CC src/support/strtod.o CC src/support/asprintf.o CC src/support/wsasocketpair.o CC src/support/strptime.o CC src/support/_setjmp.win64.o CC src/support/_longjmp.win64.o LINK src/support/libsupport.a CC src/flisp/flisp.o CC src/flisp/builtins.o CC src/flisp/string.o CC src/flisp/equalhash.o CC src/flisp/table.o CC src/flisp/iostream.o CC src/flisp/julia_extensions.o CC src/flisp/flmain.o LINK src/flisp/libflisp.a LINK src/flisp/flisp FLISP src/julia_flisp.boot /usr/bin/wine: 1: /usr/bin/wine: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") /usr/bin/wine: 1: /usr/bin/wine: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") /usr/bin/wine: 1: /usr/bin/wine: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") /usr/bin/wine: 1: /usr/bin/wine: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") make[1]: *** [julia_flisp.boot] Error 2
[julia-users] Re: Julia-i18n logo proposal
that is using Steven Sagaert's idea of math constants or similar On Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 1:27:20 AM UTC-4, mmus wrote: > > This would be a great idea for the JuliaMath organization (current logo is > ugly). Waldir Pimenta do you think you could take a stab at this, since > the logos you created here are lovely. > > On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 8:35:25 AM UTC-4, Steven Sagaert wrote: >> >> How about using fundamental constants? >> either from mathematics: pi, e, i >> or from physics : G, h, c >> >> On Friday, September 30, 2016 at 2:47:04 AM UTC+2, Waldir Pimenta wrote: >>> >>> Hi all. I made a proposal for the logo for the Julia-i18n organization: >>> http://imgh.us/julia-i18n_1.svg >>> >>> It uses the three most used scripts worldwide, and the characters are >>> actually the start of the word “Julia” as written in each of those scripts. >>> >>> Looking forward to know what you guys think. >>> >>> --Waldir >>> >>
[julia-users] Re: Julia-i18n logo proposal
This would be a great idea for the JuliaMath organization (current logo is ugly). Waldir Pimenta do you think you could take a stab at this, since the logos you created here are lovely. On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 8:35:25 AM UTC-4, Steven Sagaert wrote: > > How about using fundamental constants? > either from mathematics: pi, e, i > or from physics : G, h, c > > On Friday, September 30, 2016 at 2:47:04 AM UTC+2, Waldir Pimenta wrote: >> >> Hi all. I made a proposal for the logo for the Julia-i18n organization: >> http://imgh.us/julia-i18n_1.svg >> >> It uses the three most used scripts worldwide, and the characters are >> actually the start of the word “Julia” as written in each of those scripts. >> >> Looking forward to know what you guys think. >> >> --Waldir >> >
