Re: Review Request 119111: Make FindGettext compatible with the one provided by CMake

2014-07-09 Thread Alex Merry


 On July 8, 2014, 9:51 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
  I know i'm late, but if CMake provides one, can't we just kill ours?

The CMake one isn't quite compatible, so I wanted to keep this to make porting 
a little easier. Note that this is in kdelibs4support, and therefore 
deprecated. As soon as you stop your project finding kdelibs4support, it will 
no longer be available, and you will be using the CMake version.


- Alex


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/#review61935
---


On July 7, 2014, 5:27 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/
 ---
 
 (Updated July 7, 2014, 5:27 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jonathan Riddell.
 
 
 Repository: kdelibs4support
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This version will accept the old GETTEXT_PROCESS_PO_FILES() syntax (no
 PO_FILES argument), but will also accept the new syntax required by
 CMake's version of this file. It will also warn when PO_FILES is not
 given.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   cmake/modules/FindGettext.cmake 91e88f7e00ac52539066e71eeffb7df6c2148196 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 None whatsoever: Jonathan, you know where this isssue has been seen, can you 
 test?
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Alex Merry
 


___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 119111: Make FindGettext compatible with the one provided by CMake

2014-07-08 Thread Albert Astals Cid

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/#review61935
---


I know i'm late, but if CMake provides one, can't we just kill ours?

- Albert Astals Cid


On jul. 7, 2014, 5:27 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/
 ---
 
 (Updated jul. 7, 2014, 5:27 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jonathan Riddell.
 
 
 Repository: kdelibs4support
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This version will accept the old GETTEXT_PROCESS_PO_FILES() syntax (no
 PO_FILES argument), but will also accept the new syntax required by
 CMake's version of this file. It will also warn when PO_FILES is not
 given.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   cmake/modules/FindGettext.cmake 91e88f7e00ac52539066e71eeffb7df6c2148196 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 None whatsoever: Jonathan, you know where this isssue has been seen, can you 
 test?
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Alex Merry
 


___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 119111: Make FindGettext compatible with the one provided by CMake

2014-07-08 Thread Aleix Pol
On Tuesday 08 July 2014 21:51:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/#review61935
 ---
 
 
 I know i'm late, but if CMake provides one, can't we just kill ours?
 
 - Albert Astals Cid
 
 On jul. 7, 2014, 5:27 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
  ---
  This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
  https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/
  ---
  
  (Updated jul. 7, 2014, 5:27 p.m.)
  
  
  Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jonathan Riddell.
  
  
  Repository: kdelibs4support
  
  
  Description
  ---
  
  This version will accept the old GETTEXT_PROCESS_PO_FILES() syntax (no
  PO_FILES argument), but will also accept the new syntax required by
  CMake's version of this file. It will also warn when PO_FILES is not
  given.
  
  
  Diffs
  -
  
cmake/modules/FindGettext.cmake 
91e88f7e00ac52539066e71eeffb7df6c2148196
  
  Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/diff/
  
  
  Testing
  ---
  
  None whatsoever: Jonathan, you know where this isssue has been seen, can
  you test?
  
  
  Thanks,
  
  Alex Merry

Yes, we should, that's why I asked somewhere if they're compatible...?

At least we should deprecate it.

Aleix
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 119111: Make FindGettext compatible with the one provided by CMake

2014-07-07 Thread Jonathan Riddell

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/#review61812
---


Working well to solve the build issues in Plasma 5

- Jonathan Riddell


On July 4, 2014, 1:05 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/
 ---
 
 (Updated July 4, 2014, 1:05 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jonathan Riddell.
 
 
 Repository: kdelibs4support
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This version will accept the old GETTEXT_PROCESS_PO_FILES() syntax (no
 PO_FILES argument), but will also accept the new syntax required by
 CMake's version of this file. It will also warn when PO_FILES is not
 given.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   cmake/modules/FindGettext.cmake 91e88f7e00ac52539066e71eeffb7df6c2148196 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 None whatsoever: Jonathan, you know where this isssue has been seen, can you 
 test?
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Alex Merry
 


___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 119111: Make FindGettext compatible with the one provided by CMake

2014-07-07 Thread Jonathan Riddell

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/#review61811
---

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Jonathan Riddell


On July 4, 2014, 1:05 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/
 ---
 
 (Updated July 4, 2014, 1:05 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jonathan Riddell.
 
 
 Repository: kdelibs4support
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This version will accept the old GETTEXT_PROCESS_PO_FILES() syntax (no
 PO_FILES argument), but will also accept the new syntax required by
 CMake's version of this file. It will also warn when PO_FILES is not
 given.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   cmake/modules/FindGettext.cmake 91e88f7e00ac52539066e71eeffb7df6c2148196 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 None whatsoever: Jonathan, you know where this isssue has been seen, can you 
 test?
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Alex Merry
 


___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 119111: Make FindGettext compatible with the one provided by CMake

2014-07-07 Thread Alex Merry

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/
---

(Updated July 7, 2014, 5:27 p.m.)


Status
--

This change has been marked as submitted.


Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jonathan Riddell.


Repository: kdelibs4support


Description
---

This version will accept the old GETTEXT_PROCESS_PO_FILES() syntax (no
PO_FILES argument), but will also accept the new syntax required by
CMake's version of this file. It will also warn when PO_FILES is not
given.


Diffs
-

  cmake/modules/FindGettext.cmake 91e88f7e00ac52539066e71eeffb7df6c2148196 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/diff/


Testing
---

None whatsoever: Jonathan, you know where this isssue has been seen, can you 
test?


Thanks,

Alex Merry

___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 119111: Make FindGettext compatible with the one provided by CMake

2014-07-04 Thread Heiko Becker

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/#review61601
---



cmake/modules/FindGettext.cmake
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/#comment42863

This also removes the first po_file argument resulting in no installed 
translations at all if a single po file per language directory is shipped.

After removing the  1 I've successfully built and installed 
systemsettings-4.98.0


- Heiko Becker


On July 4, 2014, 10:12 a.m., Alex Merry wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/
 ---
 
 (Updated July 4, 2014, 10:12 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for Build System, KDE Frameworks and Jonathan Riddell.
 
 
 Repository: kdelibs4support
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 This version will accept the old GETTEXT_PROCESS_PO_FILES() syntax (no
 PO_FILES argument), but will also accept the new syntax required by
 CMake's version of this file. It will also warn when PO_FILES is not
 given.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   cmake/modules/FindGettext.cmake 91e88f7e00ac52539066e71eeffb7df6c2148196 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 None whatsoever: Jonathan, you know where this isssue has been seen, can you 
 test?
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Alex Merry
 


___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 119111: Make FindGettext compatible with the one provided by CMake

2014-07-04 Thread Alex Merry

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/
---

(Updated July 4, 2014, 1:05 p.m.)


Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jonathan Riddell.


Changes
---

Fixed list(REMOVE_AT) call.


Repository: kdelibs4support


Description
---

This version will accept the old GETTEXT_PROCESS_PO_FILES() syntax (no
PO_FILES argument), but will also accept the new syntax required by
CMake's version of this file. It will also warn when PO_FILES is not
given.


Diffs (updated)
-

  cmake/modules/FindGettext.cmake 91e88f7e00ac52539066e71eeffb7df6c2148196 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/diff/


Testing
---

None whatsoever: Jonathan, you know where this isssue has been seen, can you 
test?


Thanks,

Alex Merry

___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel