KR> KR-100 For Sale
Hello Netter's Sorry I didn't wait until Friday but I wanted to give the list first chance before I post it on Barnstormers. I have the only KR-100 project other than Kevin Kelly's available for sale. Kevin apparently assisted on this build and all KR-100 related components have been built and installed. The Project is completed through the boat stage, is on the gear with the controls installed. The tail in partially complete with balanced tail surfaces. The fiberglass seat has been constructed and installed and is different from a standard KR seat pan. Controls are all push tube design. The gear is an aluminum spring bar and has Cleveland wheels and brakes. Wing templates are included. Only the top deck is needed for the airframe so you can build it to suit your size/ specs. Some foam is included. This is a great opportunity for someone looking for a one or two of a kind aircraft that was turning speeds in the 240's at Reno. No tire kicker's please as this has to be a quick sale. Best reasonable offer in the next day or so may just have themselves an awesome start to a REALLY fast plane. May deliver for the right offer PLEASE CONTACT OFF NET ONLY!!! Steve Glover kr...@cox.net cell: 714-293-9787
KR>Vacuum
But with 280K I figure that worked out to about 4500 hours. try to get that out of an aircraft pump... Fred Johnson Reno, NV Fred I think you need to double the hour estimate. My 03 Silverado has 142600 miles and another feature of the odometer is an hour meter and it has 4120 hours. Sounds like it would be good enough for a KR. It may also need a regulator so as not to provide too much vacuum for the instruments. Jack Cooper Jack wrote: Did this pump run continously or on demand? If its on demand it may not last very long runninc continously. ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> Swift Fuel
I see Embry Riddle University is changing 40 or more of its Cessna 172s over to Swift Fuel. Read about it at AOPA aviation brief.
KR> folding wings
Well I was thinking along two separate directions. Have some made and sell them, or, have some built as part of a group build. At this point I am not interest in sharing or selling the plans. With the plans and a sample, building some more is not difficult. I would be most likely trying to do one of the above. I believe that the wing folding mechanism represents only a small part of what is necessary to safely remove manipulate and nest the wings. - Original Message - From: "The Ainsworths"To: "KRnet" Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:12 AM Subject: Re: KR> folding wings Orma Glad to see your 'at it'... I am in Canada and wish to have a look at these plans and maybe 'steal' some of it for my design using the wing diheadral start at the boat. I'll pay but not alot...especially if I am only going to see how close it is to mine and put it with my plan set. I'm getting old too, and I may just continue to be a KR 'wannabee'...so it is not a big deal but will be part of a 'batch' of KR people who may be part of a purchase. Good luck... and be careful! Gary - Canada - Original Message - From: "Orma Robbins" To: "KRnet" Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 10:42 PM Subject: Re: KR> folding wings About those folding wing plans. I Got a set. Still in the envelope with all the ceertified postage stuff. . ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR>Vacuum
It ran continuously. It has a reserve canister as a means to reduce load when you kick something on like put it in 4 wheel, but if it didn't run, trust me on this one, the heater controls locked in the defrost mode and only ran cold air. Try driving to work in the 10 degree temps with cold air on your defroster and no 4x to get out of the snow. I must say that it was only the early`99 model diesels that had the electric as they went back to belt driven pump in the `00 and later models. But with 280K I figure that worked out to about 4500 hours. try to get that out of an aircraft pump... I can verify that if you need with my brother who is a Ford mechanic. Heck, if it wasn't for him I probably still would be driving with cold air :0) Fred Johnson Reno, NV Jack wrote: Did this pump run continously or on demand? If its on demand it may not last very long runninc continously.
KR>Vacuum
Did this pump run continously or on demand? If its on demand it may not last very long runninc continously. Jack Cooper - Original Message - From: "Fred Johnson"To: "KRnet" Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:08:11 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: RE: KR>Vacuum Better yet, why not use the Ford electric vacuum pump of the `99 diesels? They weight about 12 ounces and barely larger than my fist. At 200 bucks they are a lot cheaper and lighter than an aircraft pump. And I put 280K on my truck before the pump went out last winter. It ran the 4x4, the heater controls and some of the turbo controls. I would think it could run a pair of gauges?? Fred Johnson Reno, NV Randy wrote: Has anyone tried to use a Chevy belt driven vacuum pump ? They are readily available, reliable and reasonably compact. They were used on the Chevy pickups with the 6.2 litter diesel engines. I put well over a 100K miles on one with no problems. They could be belt driven or a coupler could be easily made to drive them direct. Just a thought. ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> APRS / ELT
Hi all, long-time follower, first-time poster. While I haven't started my KR-2S project yet, I thank all of you for your dedication to this ongoing resource. I have read many great ideas and hints and will be doing frequent searches when the building starts. I work as a Sheriff Deputy in California and am assigned as a pilot to our Air Support Unit. Having been in the unit for 7 years now, it is safe to say I have worked my fair share of downed aircraft and beacon alerts. The APRS discussion has been great and many folks have made some great points. >From my viewpoint, the 121.5 system was extremely unreliable. Easily, at least half the searches we conducted for downed aircraft were without any ELT activation - at least by the time we made it on scene. Generally, an aircraft was reported overdue. Authorities were notified and a search begun. This generally started with origination and destination airports. Then expanded to known course. Sometimes, the search was delayed hours or even days. Unfortunately, pilots have a habit of not filing flight plans anymore, so more likely than not the notification comes from friends or family. Even if we were lucky enough to pick up a signal, the 121.5 system required a very complicated search of the "alert area" because of the omni-directional signal and no equipment to zero in on it. As for the 406 system - it looks promising and will be a huge help for searchers because of the GPS reporting. I have had only one experience with the system so far - that being a camper in the Sierras experiencing chest pain and made notification via the "Spot" unit he had for the trip. We received instant notification and coordinates that were right on the money. Flew to the location and hoisted him out without searching or delay. As for APRS, let me just say that I was so impressed with its capabilities that I studied for and received my Technician license so I can operate one. My plan is to make one or two portables to carry while flying at work. We generally operate in remote terrain and without a flight plan or flight following (just the nature of the business). If we had a mishap, it could literally be forever before we were located if I was unable to activate my portable PLB. The interesting thing is that the APRS is a free version of commercial flight tracking systems that are becoming very popular and quite expensive. They offer everything APRS is capable of. The benefit is the live flight tracking. Even if the unit fails in a crash, the last point of contact is a much better place to start than pointing to a random place on the map. As a rescuer, I hope that someday one of my searches involves the APRS system. It would be of great benefit to pull-up an aircrafts flight before I begin a search. I know it would greatly assist in the location and can be nothing but beneficial. While I don't condone anymore gov't regulation, I would hope that all airmen see the benefit of this equipment and move to a volunteer adoption of installing and using it. By my experience, it is likely to be your friends and family that make the overdue report anyway, why not give them the tools and ability to track you and narrow the search information for the authorities. Think of it as a redundant system - when it comes to aircraft, you can never have too much of that. Oh yeah - I guess I would recommend a "Spot" also if you are of the outdoor adventurist type. Tim Caughron KR-2S plan holder caugh...@bak.rr.com
KR>Vacuum
I think it is a great idea, and you could back it up with engine vacuum very much like Precise Flight. Tony Wright N6654
KR>Vacuum
An excellent idea. But isn't one of the ideas behind using vacuum instruments so they won't have to rely on the electrical system? I could see this as a good thing because vacuum instruments are usually cheaper and surely there is a more reliable pump than on current aircraft but using an electric pump takes away some of the advantages of a vacuum system. Now that being said we are in an era of many all electric airplanes, EFIS, Electronic Ignition and redundant systems so an electric pump if needed would be acceptable in those craft with redundant systems. Rodney -Original Message- From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf Of Fred Johnson Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:08 To: 'KRnet' Subject: RE: KR>Vacuum Better yet, why not use the Ford electric vacuum pump of the `99 diesels? They weight about 12 ounces and barely larger than my fist. At 200 bucks they are a lot cheaper and lighter than an aircraft pump. And I put 280K on my truck before the pump went out last winter. It ran the 4x4, the heater controls and some of the turbo controls. I would think it could run a pair of gauges?? Fred Johnson Reno, NV Randy wrote: Has anyone tried to use a Chevy belt driven vacuum pump ? They are readily available, reliable and reasonably compact. They were used on the Chevy pickups with the 6.2 litter diesel engines. I put well over a 100K miles on one with no problems. They could be belt driven or a coupler could be easily made to drive them direct. Just a thought. ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR>Vacuum
Better yet, why not use the Ford electric vacuum pump of the `99 diesels? They weight about 12 ounces and barely larger than my fist. At 200 bucks they are a lot cheaper and lighter than an aircraft pump. And I put 280K on my truck before the pump went out last winter. It ran the 4x4, the heater controls and some of the turbo controls. I would think it could run a pair of gauges?? Fred Johnson Reno, NV Randy wrote: Has anyone tried to use a Chevy belt driven vacuum pump ? They are readily available, reliable and reasonably compact. They were used on the Chevy pickups with the 6.2 litter diesel engines. I put well over a 100K miles on one with no problems. They could be belt driven or a coupler could be easily made to drive them direct. Just a thought.
KR> folding wings
Orma Glad to see your 'at it'... I am in Canada and wish to have a look at these plans and maybe 'steal' some of it for my design using the wing diheadral start at the boat. I'll pay but not alot...especially if I am only going to see how close it is to mine and put it with my plan set. I'm getting old too, and I may just continue to be a KR 'wannabee'...so it is not a big deal but will be part of a 'batch' of KR people who may be part of a purchase. Good luck... and be careful! Gary - Canada - Original Message - From: "Orma Robbins"To: "KRnet" Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 10:42 PM Subject: Re: KR> folding wings About those folding wing plans. I Got a set. Still in the envelope with all the ceertified postage stuff. .