KR> Marty Martin

[dustin Reves]

Larry, the person I was trying to contact was the title of the post. I dont 
know how to make it more obvious than that brother.

Marty. Nah man I am from texas. I HAVE been in contact with a dude from new 
zealand who bought the GK1. I think you might have me confused with him or 
someone else you have been talking to. I have shot you an e-mail a few times 
with no reply, I figured you blocked me when my account got hacked and started 
spamming the board(sorry about that guys).take your time, I was just making 
sure you dont forget about me  

KR> Marty Martin

[dustin Reves]

I think you might have blocked my e-mail due to my account being hacked a few 
months back. you were gonna try to get ahold of some pictures for me, I just 
wanted to make sure you were getting my e-mails, thx.   
   

KR> My account has been hacked

[Dustin Reves]

I'm sorry guys my e-mail account has been hacked. I apologised if  
anyone gets junk mail from me or if any BS is posted from my account.  
I will be able to fix it when I get home. Please do not remove. me  
from the list

Blessed is the lord my strength which teaches my hands to war and my  
fingers to fight.

On Mar 16, 2011, at 11:00 PM, krnet-requ...@mylist.net wrote:

> Send KRnet mailing list submissions to
>kr...@mylist.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://mylist.net/listinfo/krnet
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>krnet-requ...@mylist.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>krnet-ow...@mylist.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of KRnet digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. RE:  Progress so far (Dan Heath)
>   2.  Hand held COM anyone? (Jose Fuentes)
>   3.  (no subject) (Patrick and Robin Russo)
>   4.  FW: What is in this KIT (Dan Heath)
>   5. RE:  FW: What is in this KIT (Mark)
>   6. Re:  FW: What is in this KIT (Virgil N. Salisbury)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 05:51:29 -0400
> From: "Dan Heath" 
> Subject: RE: KR> Progress so far
> To: "'KRnet'" 
> Message-ID: <001101cbe3bf$b939c220$2bad4660$@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Thanks
>
> See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics
> See you at the 2011 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN
> There is a time for building and it never seems to end.
> Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC
>
> -Original Message-
> From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On  
> Behalf
> Of Mark
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 10:28 PM
> To: 'KRnet'; virg...@bellsouth.net
> Subject: RE: KR> Progress so far
>
> Go to the Wicks site and enter KR firewall in the search box and you  
> should
> see their 'kit'... it's $45
>
> -Original Message-
> From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On  
> Behalf
> Of Dan Heath
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 4:11 PM
> To: virg...@bellsouth.net; 'KRnet'
> Subject: RE: KR> Progress so far
>
> Virg,
>
> I just searched their web site for such a kit and could not find  
> it.  If you
> know the part number or have a link to it on their web site, please  
> post it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics See you  
> at the
> 2011 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Il - MVN There is a time for  
> building and
> it never seems to end.
> Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC
>
>
> -Original Message-
>Get the Fibrefax and Stainless kit from Wicks, Virg
>
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:32:14 -0400
> From: Jose Fuentes 
> Subject: KR> Hand held COM anyone?
> To: KRnet 
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> HI everyone,
>
> Was looking to see if anyone had a Hand Held COM they would like to  
> sell?
>
> Let me know, little R me.
>
> Joe
>
> -- 
> Jose Fuentes
> Founding Father (one of and former Vice Prez) of Capital City.NET  
> User's
> Group
> Former Microsoft MVP
> http://blogs.aspadvice.com/jfuentes
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:03:55 -0400
> From: "Patrick and Robin Russo" 
> Subject: KR> (no subject)
> To: "KRnet" 
> Message-ID: <1A6CEE0611304E529B60BDDFF31C8E06@pate45a8411f88>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I am about to glass my tail feathers. In and on past projects I have  
> NOT used Peel Ply but intend to do so now. My question; do I  
> squeegee off my excess resin before applying the ply?? Or do I  
> squeegee off the excess thru the ply?? I am using Styrofoam  
> (blueboard) and my usual approach is apply a coat of resin, follow  
> with a coat of slurry, lay on the cloth, stipple well and squeegee  
> off the excess.
> Pat Russo
>
> --
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:51:23 -0400
> From: "Dan Heath" 
> Subject: KR> FW: What is in this KIT
> To: "'KRnet'" 
> Message-ID: <001501cbe435$19f11260$4dd33720$@net>
> Content-Type: 

KR> Just recieved my first check

[dustin Reves]

This is the easiest partime job ive ever found you should try it out and earn 
an extra $500 to $1000 a week http://bit.ly/fM3Fsx  Sign up i'll help you earn 
just as much as i do. your gonna laugh at how easy this is.

KR> Just recieved my first check

[dustin Reves]

This is the easiest partime job ive ever found you should try it out and earn 
an extra $500 to $1000 a week http://bit.ly/hEYAgk  Sign up i'll help you earn 
just as much as i do. your gonna laugh at how easy this is.

KR> Spar

[Dustin Reves]

Larry

Instead of doing a 3 piece setup like is in the plans, my spar will be  
bent up at the fuselage like Darren Cromptons kr. The only difference  
will be, I am gonna do away with the WAFS so everything will be 1  
piece. This should create a little more room for fuel in the wings and  
allow me to have flaps much much larger than the average kr. Also,  
come hell or high water I am going to have retractable landing gear on  
my plane. I know the argument for fixed gear over retracts is a strong  
one, but I just can't get around it. If I'm gonna build it it's gotta  
be exactly what I want or I can't justify spending the time.

Blessed is the lord my strength which teaches my hands to war and my  
fingers to fight.

KR> Don betchans retracts and fuselage sides

[Dustin Reves]

I'm not worried about losing stub wing as I am going to be going with  
a solid spar on my kr1. Should create anough space within the wings to  
move stuff around a bit.

Blessed is the lord my strength which teaches my hands to war and my  
fingers to fight.

KR> RE>ID my airfoil

[dustin Reves]

There are no ready made wing skins produced for the AS5046 airfoils. If you 
have ready made "skins" they are wither Deihl or Rand  RAF airfoil skins. 
The only way I can think to Identify your airfoil if the wing is already built 
is to print out and AS5046 stub wing template and compare it to your stub wing. 

KR> Don betchans retracts and fuse side questions.

[dustin Reves]

Does anyone have any pictures(aside from the ones on marks website) of
how they retracted? Did don have to modify the spar
 to them to retract
properly? Is the entire system mounted spar foreward? I cant make it
out from the photos on langford's site.


Also


>From what I have been reading most KR fuse sides are wider at the
shoulders than they are at the bottom, is this correct?  Would it 
incur
any significant increase in work to make them the same width top and
bottom? I bought Mike Arnold's AR-5 DVD's and from 
what I understand
that played a big part in lowering interference drag between the fuse
and wing. Also, putting the widest part of the fuselage 
at the trailing
edge of the wing. am I silly to think this is the way to go with a KR
as well?

KR> Don betchans retracts and fuselage sides.

[dustin Reves]

Does anyone have any pictures(aside from the ones on marks website) of
how they retracted? Did don have to modify the spar
 to them to retract
properly? Is the entire system mounted spar foreward? I cant make it
out from the photos on langford's site.


Also


>From what I have been reading most KR fuse sides are wider at the
shoulders than they are at the bottom, is this correct?  Would it 
incur
any significant increase in work to make them the same width top and
bottom? I bought Mike Arnold's AR-5 DVD's and from 
what I understand
that played a big part in lowering interference drag between the fuse
and wing. Also, putting the widest part of the fuselage 
at the trailing
edge of the wing. am I silly to think this is the way to go with a KR
as well?

KR> Vibrations

[dustin Reves]

If his prop tips were going supersonic wouldnt he be getting that high pitched 
"Prop Rip" noise as well? excuse me but I dont really know what the term for 
that phenomena is.
_
Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don?t worry about storage limits.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Storage1_052009

KR> KR1 Plans specified width?

[dustin Reves]

What is the standard width of the KR-1?

_
Windows Live?: Keep your life in sync.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009

KR> Tandem kr Part II

[dustin Reves]

For anyone who hasnt seen it. Here is the link to the tandem KR I was referring 
to. It was given to me by dan heath(hosted on his website). The plane was sold 
on EBAY about a year ago.

_
Windows Live?: Keep your life in sync.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009

KR> Tandem KR PT II

[dustin Reves]

I agree with what you are saying  mark and I respect your views on the subject. 
I am willing to put. In the hours to do the modification to the airframe, but, 
if the undertaking isn't worthwhile and it is unlikely I will reach my 
performance goals I might consider goi g with the sonerai.i am really trying to 
kill 2 birds with one stone with this build. A nice cross country cruiser that 
I can use as my own personal dogfighter when flying solo. What I really want 
for me is a ride that will really haul a$$ solo. I was originally going to 
build a modified kr1, but my fiancée has expressed the interest in flying 
together. I guess I need to take her up in a light plane and see if she really 
wants to go flying. Maybe I can get out of building a 2 place aircraft. 

Sorry for the horrible typing. I'm sending this on an iphone

_
Hotmail® goes with you. 
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Mobile?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Mobile1_052009

KR> RE: KRnet Digest, Vol 351, Issue 147

[dustin Reves]

well. I am in the process of gathering up wood for a ragwing special biplane to 
indulge my more selfish side. This project will have to go fast AND be able to 
carry my fiance occasionally.OR, the KR1.  You did not mention the requirement 
to carry a passenger.

See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics 
See you at the 2009 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon, Ill
There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for Flying
has begun.
Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC

-Original Message-
From: krnet-bounces at mylist.net [mailto:krnet-bounces at mylist.net] On Behalf
Of dustin Reves
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:24 AM
To: KRNET LIST POST
Subject: KR> Tandem seating PT II

Perhaps I should be looking at other designs?

_
Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009

KR> Tandem seating PT II

[dustin Reves]

Did this so it would be easier to read

OK after thinking about the tandem seating Idea for a few days I feel
like it  will be a little bit harder than I thought it would... But
based on my limited knowledge of aerodynamics, and a few basic
assumptions, this might still be worthwhile. Obviously I would like to
get the maximum performance out of my project that I can. There are 2
reasons that I am fixated on the tandem seating arrangement. 

1.
I feel like the decreased width of the airplane will benefit in making
it as slippery as possible. obviously something 44" wide is gonna be
harder to push through the air than something 30 inches wide.

2.
The tandem seating just feels sporty to me. Much more like sitting in a
fighter plane than a cross country cruiser. Well, doesnt everybody
wanna feel like they are flying a fighter?

The drawbacks are the
rather large adjustments that will have to be made to the airframe. Im
thinking the wing will have to be moved  back. The front passenger will
have to sit somewhere right on top of the foreward spar. while the
pilot (rear) will basically be sitting  directly on the trailing edge
of the wing. I havent done the math(nor do I know how to ) but this is
definately going to necessitate moving the firewall foreward. If I
follow the suggestions of previous builders(Mark L) and use the full
length of longeron material provided in the boat kit I think I will
have enough material to massage the dimensions around enough to get the
aircraft to be able to balance properly. There are only 2 pictures
available of the only flying kr I know of with tandem seating. There is
very little daetail on the modifications done to make it fly properly,
so I am kind of just winging it and theorizing right now.   Am I just
dreaming and making this more difficult than it should be? If I had the
finances I would be looking at something like the thunder mustang, but
of course I dont(as so few of us do). Perhaps I should be looking at
other designs?

_
Windows Live?: Keep your life in sync.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009

KR> Tandem seating PT II

[dustin Reves]

OK after thinking about the tandem seating Idea for a few days I feel like it  
will be a little bit harder than I thought it would... But based on my limited 
knowledge of aerodynamics, and a few basic assumptions, this might still be 
worthwhile. Obviously I would like to get the maximum performance out of my 
project that I can. There are 2 reasons that I am fixated on the tandem seating 
arrangement. 

1. I feel like the decreased width of the airplane will benefit in making it as 
slippery as possible. obviously something 44" wide is gonna be harder to push 
through the air than something 30 inches wide.

2. The tandem seating just feels sporty to me. Much more like sitting in a 
fighter plane than a cross country cruiser. Well, doesnt everybody wanna feel 
like they are flying a fighter?

The drawbacks are the rather large adjustments that will have to be made to the 
airframe. Im thinking the wing will have to be moved  back. The front passenger 
will have to sit somewhere right on top of the foreward spar. while the pilot 
(rear) will basically be sitting  directly on the trailing edge of the wing. I 
havent done the math(nor do I know how to ) but this is definately going to 
necessitate moving the firewall foreward. If I follow the suggestions of 
previous builders(Mark L) and use the full length of longeron material provided 
in the boat kit I think I will have enough material to massage the dimensions 
around enough to get the aircraft to be able to balance properly. There are 
only 2 pictures available of the only flying kr I know of with tandem seating. 
There is very little daetail on the modifications done to make it fly properly, 
so I am kind of just winging it and theorizing right now.   Am I just dreaming 
and making this more difficult than it should be? If I had the finances I would 
be looking at something like the thunder mustang, but of course I dont(as so 
few of us do). Perhaps I should be looking at other designs?



_
Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don?t worry about storage limits.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Storage1_052009

KR> Tandem seating

[dustin Reves]

I seem to recall there was a fellow who built a kr2 with a tandem seating 
arrangement. Does anyone have the link to his website? Also, what do you guys 
think about this? I personally prefer the tandem seating. I am considering 
modifyi g my own project in this manner and using a Vari ez canopy or so eying 
similar. I plan to make the firewall just wide enoug to accompdate a 3100cc 
corvair and continuing that same witdth untill the trailing egds of the 
fuselage in the same manner as mike arnolds ar-5.

_
Hotmail® goes with you. 
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Mobile?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Mobile1_052009

KR> Garth Kopkes GK1

[dustin Reves]

For anyone who has been looking for info on garth's GK1 I made a contact who 
helped him build it and actually owned it. he sent me tons of pics and some 
hand drawn diagrams of some of the parts and fuselage. If anyone(like me) is 
still chasing information down I would be glad to help
_
It?s the same Hotmail®. If by ?same? you mean up to 70% faster. 
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_AE_Same_022009

KR> To nitride or not?

[dustin Reves]

I think for 100 dollars its a little extra piece of insurance I wouldnt mind 
having.

_
Want to read Hotmail messages in Outlook? The Wordsmiths show you how.
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/wedowindowslive.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!20EE04FBC541789!167.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_092008

KR> Guess who

[dustin Reves]

The second plane loked like Mark Langford. I think he has the only plane that 
"color"
_
Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live.
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008

KR> Whats wrong with the list

[dustin Reves]

Mark

I have been using this link http://mylist.net/private/krnet/ To view the 
archives. Normally it lists all the e-mails for this year and the past years. 
But lately it only lists about 10 at a time from 08
_
See how Windows Mobile brings your life together?at home, work, or on the go.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093182mrt/direct/01/