Re: [LegacyUG] Naming Images and documents

2020-05-09 Thread Barry Godbeer
The use of RIN numbers in identifying images and documents may have a downside 
if you are in the habit of merging individuals together with their immediate 
families were two RINs become one. If you also have set your RIN numbering to 
use “Reuse abandoned RINs” (Option 4.4) this could lead to further 
complications in your image and document identification.

Just a thought.

Barry Godbeer

From: Linda Greethurst
Sent: May 9, 2020 9:08 AM
To: Legacy User Group
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Naming Images and documents

What ever method you develop for your filing system: Keep It Simple, Sensible  
(KISS)

Legacy already assigns everyone a RIN.  I have 37 Ole Olsens in my lines.  I 
know, I have the Norse naming system to deal with too; so I know them by their 
farm name but more importantly, I identify my files and pictures by the RIN 
too, For example:  Ole Olsen Aukrust RIN348 Baptism.  Legacy's Index tab is my 
quick reference to a person and a number. 

 My thought process is since I have already transcribed and translated the 
document into Legacy, I really don't need to duplicate the info into the filing 
label.  So my system just tells me where to go to see the detail of the 
document.  Or am I overlooking something and making my filing too simplified?

On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 11:42 PM Jane Linkswiler  wrote:
Far north Queensland. Wonderful. I've been in the areahmmm, 3 times so
far. Love going to Australia. 

I hear what you are saying. Actually, if you are going with the 8 folder
system, you will have your grandmother as a child in her father's name's
folder but with her marriage, you will find her from that point in her
husband's name's folder. Going further back with her parents will be
increasing their folder size as far back as you choose to go. All branches
will still be in that folder. If you see a list, it will be alpha. This is
an example of one of my picture's file name: 
Walden, Irving Holbrook b cert 1871 Mar 31 MA, Worc Co, Milbury, cert copy 
It is in the Walden folder (my maternal gfather) but so are Hixons (my
maternal ggmother) so you see.  Actually, Irving was one of my gfather's
nephews. 
Don't know if you've seen any transcriptions on Family Search. I like them
for their clarity and, as I wish to have .jpgs, our old friend Microsoft
Paint is terrific for putting text down and saving as .jpg.

My, I do get wordy,

Jane in Phoenix

-Original Message-
From: LegacyUserGroup  On Behalf Of
June
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 8:18 PM
To: 'Legacy User Group' 
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Naming Images and documents

Thanks Jane - I do like your idea of keeping the folders in the direct lines
- so 8 grandparent's as you are doing. That makes it neat and easily
searchable if the labelling has been done correctly and consistently. It
will make it easy to know which folder to go to straight away rather than
search through goodness knows how many birth certificates etc as I currently
do.

Another query though please. If we have Thomas Smith (grandfather) and he
marries Susan Marston (grandmother) that is two folders for 2 grandparents.
I could then open 2 more folders one for Susan Marston's father (my great
grandfather) and one for Susan's mother (my great grandmother). 

I could then do a sub folder for Thomas Smith's father - keeping each
generation of direct line Smith in a sub folder of my grandfather, I could
also then create sub folders for her generation. I do see that this would
lead me to have more folders/sub folder. and would appear, if I have read it
correctly, to be different to what you are doing by keeping the 8 direct
lines only. That's if I've understood you, apologies if not.

I think I could label the images something like
SmithThomas4xgfb1885BapCRotherham. But I need to work on the labelling. Some
of the folders might only have 1 or 2 images in depending how far back they
are. 

Let me know what you think and I will give it a trial with a few images and
see how it looks and works.

Many thanks for your suggestions and help.

June in far North Queensland

-Original Message-
From: LegacyUserGroup  On Behalf Of
Jane Linkswiler
Sent: Saturday, 9 May 2020 11:57 AM
To: 'Legacy User Group' 
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Naming Images and documents

I, for one, still just have folders in the 8 grandparent's names. It is
conceivable that that might change and if it does..can't do subfolder to
the father, that would tell me to make subfolders for all children which
will just get messy. For me. So far, I just like the name followed by a b
date.

Let me know what you decide and why, please.

Jane in Phoenix



-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/


-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http

Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer for UK Baptisms

2017-04-26 Thread Barry Godbeer
tric (long 
winded) for my records.

Carolyn

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Cathy Pinner <genea...@gmail.com
<mailto:genea...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Ian,
    It's not possible to make your own SourceWriter templates. This
    has bee n asked for, but for some reason rejected.

    Another tip for UK records. Anything at the The National Archives
    can be sourced using a Census template that has the relevant
    fields for the Department code and series number in the Master
    Source and a field for the piece number in the Source Detail.
    I add folio and page to the piece box as well to follow TNA
    citation style. In this detail Elizabeth Shown Mills seems to
    break her principles of keeping a reference together. I haven't
    seen the latest editions of her work to see if she's amended her
    English Census models.

    Cathy

    Ian Thomas <mailto:il.tho...@outlook.com
    <mailto:il.tho...@outlook.com >>
    Monday, 24 April 2017 7:07 AM

    Wouldn't it be great if Millenia provided add on packages that
    covered the different methods of recording in various
    countries at different times, but that would be a daunting
    task I'm sure.

    Or – does anyone know whether Legacy’s SourceWriter Templates
    created by others for their specific purpose are
    “transferrable”? That is, are they a separate named file on
    the creator’s disk, which could be uploaded to a site where
    others might download and then install into their Legacy
    system on their computer?

    If that is a possibility, in effect, a Legacy community
    resource could be created.

    I’m not sure whether the format of SourceWriter has changed,
    from v8 (or before?) to v9 of Legacy.

    Ian Thomas

    Albert Park, Victoria 3206 Australia

    Barry Godbeer <mailto:b_goodbee...@rogers.com
    <mailto:b_goodbee...@rogers.com>>
    Monday, 24 April 2017 2:12 AM
    Cathy,

  p;  Thank you for your quick and helpful reply.

    You seem to have found a way to record non US sources in
    Legacy that would work for me. One of my concerns was possibly
    having a different Master Source for every church. If I
    understand your two examples correctly you have some Master
    Sources for individual churches and some for a central
    depository depending on where you sourced the information.

    Rather than have a mix I think I will start off my baptism
    Master Sources using a central depository (SWHT/Parochial
    Church Council/Findmypast), understan ding that nothing works
    for ever. I have overlooked marriage banns in the past because
    I didn't know what to do with them. Now you have given me
    direction.

    Wouldn't it be great if Millenia provided add on packages that
    covered the different methods of recording in various
    countries at different times, but that would be a daunting
    task I'm sure.

    Thanks again,

    Barry Godbeer




    On Saturday, April 22, 2017 9:56 PM, Cathy Pinner
    <geneakit@ gmail.com <mailto:genea...@gmail.com>> wrote:


    Barry,

    Church Records include Baptisms, Burials and Marriages. The
    records are recorded in Church Registers or "record books" in
    Legacy speak.
    So you're looking for Church records > Church record books >
    created at local level (parish, congregation, meeting, etc) >
    and then the format you've used. I've chosen to use the
    Microfilm/fiche rather than online images as I've seem some at
    the Archives on microfilm in a rare visit to England and some
  & nbsp; online.
    I use the Film ID in the Master Source to acknowledge both
    sources: eg: Images courtesy of South West Heritage Trust &
    Parochial Church Council & FindMyPast
    I actually make a Master Source for each church but I could
    have instead chosen to make a Master Source for each Archive.
    In my case: Dorset History Centre, the London Metropolitan
    Archives, etc.
    I learn where the registers actually are arc hived.

    So one Master Source reads: St Margaret (Topsham, Devon,
    England); Images courtesy of So uth West Heritage Trust and
    Parochial Church Council & FindMyPast, Devon Heritage Centre,
    Exeter.
    and a source citation:
    St Margaret (Topsham, Devon, England), "Marriages
    1417A/PR/1/15 1837-1881," Page 1, No 1 1837 marriage of
    William Harris & Rebecca Mawditt; Images courtesy of South
    West Heritage Trust and Parochial Church Council & FindMyPast,
    Devon Heritage Centre, Exeter.

    This "1417A/PR/1/15" is the Archive reference for that
    particular register. If it's not obvi

Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer for UK Baptisms

2017-04-23 Thread Barry Godbeer
Cathy,
Thank you for your quick and helpful reply.
You seem to have found a way to record non US sources in Legacy that would work 
for me. One of my concerns was possibly having a different Master Source for 
every church. If I understand your two examples correctly you have some Master 
Sources for individual churches and some for a central depository depending on 
where you sourced the information.
Rather than have a mix I think I will start off my baptism Master Sources using 
a central depository (SWHT/Parochial Church Council/Findmypast), understanding 
that nothing works for ever. I have overlooked marriage banns in the past 
because I didn't know what to do with them. Now you have given me direction.
Wouldn't it be great if Millenia provided add on packages that covered the 
different methods of recording in various countries at different times, but 
that would be a daunting task I'm sure.
Thanks again,
Barry Godbeer   

 

On Saturday, April 22, 2017 9:56 PM, Cathy Pinner <genea...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
 

 Barry,

Church Records include Baptisms, Burials and Marriages. The records are 
recorded in Church Registers or "record books" in Legacy speak.
So you're looking for Church records > Church record books > created at local 
level (parish, congregation, meeting, etc) > and then the format you've used. 
I've chosen to use the Microfilm/fiche rather than online images as I've seem 
some at the Archives on microfilm in a rare visit to England and some online.
I use the Film ID in the Master Source to acknowledge both sources: eg: Images 
courtesy of South West Heritage Trust & Parochial Church Council & FindMyPast
I actually make a Master Source for each church but I could have instead chosen 
to make a Master Source for each Archive.
In my case: Dorset History Centre, the London Metropolitan Archives, etc.
I learn where the registers actually are archived. 

So one Master Source reads: St Margaret (Topsham, Devon, England); Images 
courtesy of South West Heritage Trust and Parochial Church Council & 
FindMyPast, Devon Heritage Centre, Exeter. 
and a source citation: 
St Margaret (Topsham, Devon, England), "Marriages 1417A/PR/1/15 1837-1881," 
Page 1, No 1 1837 marriage of William Harris & Rebecca Mawditt; Images courtesy 
of South West Heritage Trust and Parochial Church Council & FindMyPast, Devon 
Heritage Centre, Exeter. 

This "1417A/PR/1/15" is the Archive reference for that particular register. If 
it's not obvious on the online site, I look at the Archive catalogue and find 
it and also record their microfilm number, if any is given. At the archives you 
can usually only see parish registers on microfilm - and probably now the 
online images.

The Source Detail has a "Title" field for the name of the actual register ( or 
church and register if you chose to have one Master Source for Devon Heritage 
Centre)
Then one for Item of interest where I record the page and record number from 
the register etc 

Here's one for Dorset: Saint Lawrence (Folke, Dorset, England), "Christenings  
PE/FOL/RE 2/1  1813-1906," p 1, no 3 baptism of George Uppill (1813); Images 
courtesy DHC and Ancestry.com; DHC microfilm MIC/R/511, Dorset History Centre, 
Dorchester. 

Does that help?
Cathy

Barry Godbeer wrote:


I am having a hard time finding the a appropriate Source Writer for 
Baptisms in various counties in England and Wales.

The Source Writer for Church Records mentions nothing about Baptisms, 
unless I have developed tunnel vision, and it is there right under my 
nose.

My OS is Microsoft Vista and my LFT is 8.0.0.598. Must update computer 
soon!

As attachments are not allowed I will try to explain my problem.

I have an image of a Baptism, viewed in Findmypast, in the Parish of 
Lower Brixham (Devon, England) that has a page number and an entry 
number with a reference to South West Heritage Trust and Parochial 
Church Council in the left margin.

The transcript, copyright of Findmypast, has, besides the name of the 
individual, date of Baptism, father and mother,etc it list the
location of the Baptism as Brixham, All Saints (not mentioned on the 
image), the Archive as South West Heritage Trust (no mention of the 
Parochial Church Council), an archive reference (1955A/PR/1/1) that 
makes no mention of the page number or line number and whose archive 
reference is it?

For sourcing purposes who holds the original Baptism document, the 
Parochial Church Council, South West Heritage Trust or Findmypast? 
Only the South West Heritage Trust and Findmypast have URLs. In years 
to come which of the three will still be around?

Do I select Source Writer>Church Records>Church Record Books>created 
at local level (parish, congregation, meetings, etc and do I do the 
best I can with that? The Source Detail related to this Master Source 
is not very informative.

To date I have not attached any images or transcripts

[LegacyUG] Source Writer for UK Baptisms

2017-04-22 Thread Barry Godbeer
I am having a hard time finding the a appropriate Source Writer for Baptisms in 
various counties in England and Wales.
The Source Writer for Church Records mentions nothing about Baptisms, unless I 
have developed tunnel vision, and it is there right under my nose.
My OS is Microsoft Vista and my LFT is 8.0.0.598. Must update computer soon!
As attachments are not allowed I will try to explain my problem.
I have an image of a Baptism, viewed in Findmypast, in the Parish of Lower 
Brixham (Devon, England) that has a page number and an entry number with a 
reference to South West Heritage Trust and Parochial Church Council in the left 
margin. 
The transcript, copyright of Findmypast, has, besides the name of the 
individual, date of Baptism, father and mother,etc it list the location of the 
Baptism as Brixham, All Saints (not mentioned on the image), the Archive as 
South West Heritage Trust (no mention of the Parochial Church Council), an 
archive reference (1955A/PR/1/1) that makes no mention of the page number or 
line number and whose archive reference is it?
For sourcing purposes who holds the original Baptism document, the Parochial 
Church Council, South West Heritage Trust or Findmypast? Only the South West 
Heritage Trust and Findmypast have URLs. In years to come which of the three 
will still be around?
Do I select Source Writer>Church Records>Church Record Books>created at local 
level (parish, congregation, meetings, etc and do I do the best I can with 
that? The Source Detail related to this Master Source is not very informative. 
To date I have not attached any images or transcripts to any sources or 
citations which might help complete the picture of the source, but that's 
another To Do Task. 
So does anyone have any suggestions? Has anyone with ancestors in England come 
up with a solution that makes sense?
Barry Godbeer
Canada-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/


Re: [LegacyUG] Version 8.0.0.499

2015-06-01 Thread Barry Godbeer
Hi John,
Like Mike Fry said I think my problem with the .499 installation was Windows 
related and had nothing to do with how Legacy runs. I have since re-downloaded 
Legacy and using the program without any trouble not withstanding any bugs (not 
found by me) there may be in the program itself.
Barry Godbeer


 On Monday, June 1, 2015 9:49 AM, Hannigan Family Research 
resea...@hannigangenealogy.us wrote:


   I got an email this morning about this being available for download.  Is it 
fixed?  Are there still bugs that need to be resolved before it is ready for 
'Prime Time' installation.

 Thanks.

 John Hannigan
 Houston, Texas

 On Friday 5 29 2015 4:41 PM, Barry Godbeer wrote:

  I have just downloaded the latest version (twice), once from within the 
Legacy program and once from the Legacy website. Each time the install has hung 
with the message Updating System Configuration, Please wait...
  Anyone else with the same problem?
  If I open the program I get a message that the install is not complete and 
will shut down!
  Barry Godbeer Brampton, Canada

 Legacy User Group guidelines:
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
 Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Re: [LegacyUG] Version 8.0.0.499

2015-05-30 Thread Barry Godbeer
Fingers crossed I have just downloaded the update again and so far no 
problems.Upon reflection the problem may have occurred as a result of my 
impatiens. On the first download yesterday there seemed to be a period of 
inactivity so I pressed Download again.! The subsequent result was the freeze 
up.Panic over.Barry GodbeerBrampton, Canada  


 On Friday, May 29, 2015 6:10 PM, Barry Godbeer b_goodbee...@rogers.com 
wrote:


 I have just downloaded the latest version (twice), once from within the Legacy 
program and once from the Legacy website. Each time the install has hung with 
the message Updating System Configuration, Please wait...
Anyone else with the same problem?
If I open the program I get a message that the install is not complete and will 
shut down!
Barry GodbeerBrampton, Canada

Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


[LegacyUG] Version 8.0.0.499

2015-05-29 Thread Barry Godbeer
I have just downloaded the latest version (twice), once from within the Legacy 
program and once from the Legacy website. Each time the install has hung with 
the message Updating System Configuration, Please wait...
Anyone else with the same problem?
If I open the program I get a message that the install is not complete and will 
shut down!
Barry GodbeerBrampton, Canada



Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Re: [LegacyUG] Sharing Sources

2014-09-20 Thread Barry Godbeer
 Thank you Jenny, Brian and Cathy for your replies.

First I must admit to a severe case of brain cramp.

My first attempt at entering sources was in Family Treemaker many years ago 
(program was DOS and on a 3 1/2 disc!). When I transferred the file over to 
Legacy Family Tree several years ago the sources that I had entered all ended 
up as Basic Sources in LFT as you know. I started using Source Writer a couple 
of years ago for census events, at first copying, using Clipboard, sources from 
one individual to other family members and editing as necessary, that worked 
fine.

I took a break from genealogy and when I came back I created a new Source 
Writer for a Census choosing Online Database instead of Online Images as my 
source. Dah! This choice presents a different Citation/Detail window. Why the 
difference is not clear to me as they are both ask for similar information but 
in a different order.

I also started to use Sharing instead of copying from from one individual to 
another.

I will have to re-enter Census years 1891 to 1841 (I worked backwards).

On reflection the advantage of copying and pasting (using Clipboard) Sources 
from one individual to another is that you can edit subsequent individuals by 
entering their names and correcting the Folio and Page changes rather than only 
having the first individuals name (without RIN) and two Folio #s and Page #s. I 
had also taken advantage when editing of adding the maiden name of married 
women to their census ID. Maybe RIN should be added also?

A Sharing aspect would come from the common Place in the Event that shows up 
in the Master Location listing where you can see a list of the individuals at 
the same Place/Location.

I now see were the difference comes from the Place (Location) in the Event 
and Location Details as the second prompts for Parish, City etc. Why so is 
not obvious to me but I guess Elizabeth Shown Mills knows best.

As pointed out some sources can be accessed from several organizations. For the 
England and Wales Census I have used the National Archives as the source and if 
you visit their site they make reference to Findmypast and Ancestry. There 
could also be a reference to Family Search. As an aside the FreeBMD website URL 
recently changed, nothing lasts forever. I think I will list secondary websites 
in Repository Notes.

On the task of re-entering the Census Data from 1841 to 1891 I will proceed 
using the Clipboard instead of Sharing so that I can edit as necessary. I will 
also change my selection to Online Images.

Thanks again for your responses.

Barry Godbeer
Brampton
Ontario
Canada


On Friday, September 19, 2014 1:04 AM, Cathy Pinner genea...@gmail.com wrote:



Hi Barry,

Re census over two pages - convention some places seems to be to only
use the reference for the head of household, but like Paula I add both.

Re the Source Detail order for the English censuses. In her examples
Elizabeth Shown Mills doesn't follow her principles to keep reference
together or The National Archives of the UK citation advice though she
does take into account the US National Archives citation methods.
I put the folio and page numbers in the piece number field to overcome
what I see as an error
So I'll enter 326 folio 23, page 2 and folio 24, page 3 all in the Piece
field.

I'm not sure what template you are using. I use the Basic Format as I've
seen the Census pages in so many different places/ways from images on CD
and microfilm and fiche to online images at various sites.
For some other National Archives of UK sources, I use a Census source as
it has space for the name of the series and the series number and use
the microfilm template. Instead of film series/no I put images courtesy
of the National Archives and findmypast.co.uk and ancestry.com ... as so
many now are found on more than one website - but they're not as
prolific as the census images online and for these lesser used sources I
and others need to know which websites hold the images.

I don't want a different master source for everywhere I look at the same
set of images.
I wouldn't have a different master source if I was accessing a book at a
number of different libraries. When seeing the actual image of the
original I think Shown Mills gives more prominence to the secondary
repository than the actual source.

Re Shared Events - I don't use them. I still use the Event Clipboard to
copy an event to other relevant people.

Cathy
 Barry Godbeer mailto:b_goodbee...@rogers.com
 Thursday, 18 September 2014 10:11 AM
 Version 8.0.0.439 Deluxe Edition OS Vista Home Edition
 I have been creating Events using Source Writer based on England and
 Wales Census records from 1841 to 1911 and have the following issues
 with the sharing of Sources.
 Many families are spread over two pages and therefore have two
 different references eg RG9 PN 326 Folio 23 Page 2 and RG9 PN 326
 Folio 24 Page 3 to enter into the Credit box of the Source Detail.Is
 this the right thing to do

[LegacyUG] Sharing Sources

2014-09-17 Thread Barry Godbeer
Version 8.0.0.439 Deluxe Edition OS Vista Home Edition

I have been creating Events using Source Writer based on England and Wales 
Census records from 1841 to 1911 and have the following issues with the sharing 
of Sources.

Many families are spread over two pages and therefore have two different 
references eg RG9 PN 326 Folio 23 Page 2 and RG9 PN 326 Folio 24 Page 3 to 
enter into the Credit box of the Source Detail.Is this the right thing to do 
or not share the Source Detail and treat each member of the household 
separately with their own specific reference.?

I note also that having entered information into the Place on the Event 
template and sharing that Event with several individuals those individuals 
are not listed at the same Place (Location) in the Master Location listing. 
Is this an oversight or intended?

When entering an existing Place on the Event template auto fill will 
present one or more options as the Place is typed in. However this is not the 
case when entering the Location Details in the Source Detail. Are these two 
boxes to receive the same information or is something else expected?

I note also that the Source Detail for Census 1841 through 1901 has a different 
layout to that of the 1911 Census. It's asking for similar information so why 
the difference?

It might be helpful also if the RIN was attached to the individual's name that 
is being shared with others.

Some of the above might be considered Suggested Changes but I will wait and see 
what response I get to this email.

Thanks,

Barry Godbeer
Brampton
Ontario
Canada


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp