RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-18 Thread BARTON LEWIS
okay, thanks Brian and Michele.
Barton


On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 08:36 AM, Michele/Support wrote:

I agree.  I only use the main URL for the website such as
https://familysearch.org https://familysearch.org  or
http://www.ancestry.com http://www.ancestry.com   
 
Michele
Technical Support
mich...@legacyfamilytree.com mailto:mich...@legacyfamilytree.com
www.legacyfamilytree.com http://www.legacyfamilytree.com
 

From: Brian L. Lightfoot [mailto:br...@the-lightfoots.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:27 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database

 
Just one word (or paragraph) of caution about trying to supply specific
URLs to these records that are part of a larger database collection. I
have seen many such repositories occasionally change their internal file
location structure so that while the URL to the home page which
typically contains a “search the database” utility tends to not change,
the specific URLs to the records themselves can and usually does change.
In other words, you might be better served if you only reference the URL
to the repository itself and let future researchers that want to view a
specific record within that repository then use whatever search
mechanisms are available to them at that future date. I suppose this can
all be summed in in Murphy’s 7th Law of the Universe: two things will
change in the future, your looks and Internet URLs.
 
Brian in CA


Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-18 Thread Michele/Support
I agree.  I only use the main URL for the website such as 
https://familysearch.org or http://www.ancestry.com



Michele

Technical Support

 mailto:mich...@legacyfamilytree.com mich...@legacyfamilytree.com

 http://www.legacyfamilytree.com www.legacyfamilytree.com



From: Brian L. Lightfoot [mailto:br...@the-lightfoots.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:27 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database



Just one word (or paragraph) of caution about trying to supply specific URLs to 
these records that are part of a larger database collection. I have seen many 
such repositories occasionally change their internal file location structure so 
that while the URL to the home page which typically contains a “search the 
database” utility tends to not change, the specific URLs to the records 
themselves can and usually does change. In other words, you might be better 
served if you only reference the URL to the repository itself and let future 
researchers that want to view a specific record within that repository then use 
whatever search mechanisms are available to them at that future date. I suppose 
this can all be summed in in Murphy’s 7th Law of the Universe: two things will 
change in the future, your looks and Internet URLs.



Brian in CA





Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-18 Thread Brian L. Lightfoot
I agree that FamilySearch and Ancestry tend to have stable file structures 
within their databases and thus the record specific URLs tend not to change, 
but it is other repositories that can and do change. I believe the OP 
referenced something like “Virginia Masrriages, 1785-1940” which caused me to 
think that this site could have been one of the many state-sponsored or 
genealogical research group repositories of vital records. I know Illinois, 
Oklahoma, Ohio and several others are ones that make available such databases 
that are not only searchable online but allow the viewing and downloading of 
individual records. All that need happen to these repositories is for a new 
governor to be elected and he/she then wants to re-organize the online 
presences of the state with, of course, a larger picture of themselves on each 
page. I suspect that Illinois is probably the worst when every time their 
governor gets sent to prison, the whole repository is revamped. (My apologies 
to Illinois residents but I grew up there and I know what happens to Illinois 
governors.)

There is nothing wrong with somehow adding in the record specific URL to the 
Legacy detail source citation. My hats off to those that want to add as much 
detailed information as they can. And generally speaking, even if the URL were 
to change, future researchers would probably be savy enough to alter the 
no-longer found URL to navigate to the main repository page upon which they 
could then perform the specific record search. So adding these specific URLs to 
your Legacy file does not mean you are doing it the wrong way. Hey, its Legacy. 
Do it whatever way you want. That’s the beauty of Legacy.

Brian in CA


PS –
For what it’s worth, I recently came across a reference in FamilySeach that had 
changed the name of the database. It seems that whenever FamilySearch updates a 
database to include additional years, the name of the database gets changed. 
For example, “Iowa, County Marriages, 1838-1934, may get changed to “Iowa, 
County Marriages, 1838-1955”. Any reference to the old database name is not 
found. I’ve learned to use the FamilySearch collection number instead of the 
database name. Thus, either the old name or the new name of “Iowa, County 
Marriages” maintains a URL of 
https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1805551.

But even with that, the Detail Source Citation within Legacy will still give 
the now-defunct database name. Fortunately the URL remains correct. I have no 
way of knowing which databases have changed nor am I inclined to go through the 
effort to change that name reference within my family file.




From: John Lisle [mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 9:11 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database

Brian, Michelle, Barton et al,

Again, please let me be the naysayer.

With some repositories, you can be more specific than just the top level URL.

For instance...

If you copy a FamilySearch record with their copy button, and paste it into a 
detail citation note, it will include the URL of the record and date the record 
was accessioned. (Even if those URLs go bad, which I have not seen, most web 
users will be able to use that to find the record.)

As for Ancestry, I have a bookmarks page with direct links to specific 
databases within ancestry that I use frequently that I setup 10+ years ago. 
Those links still work. When I setup a source for, say, the 1900 US census, I 
use that URL as the Call Number for the repository. I have not tried using a 
URL to a specific ancestry record.

However, you probably should reference the URL of a specific page in an 
ancestry tree or WorldConnect tree, if that was your source, as those pages 
could go away if the tree is removed, but will remain mostly static while tree 
is present.

I have not done it, but I suspect that you can also use URL of specific Record 
Collection search pages as Call Numbers also.

-- With ancestry and familysearch, the likelihood of those collection URLs 
changing is now minimal for their total search product to work.

john.


At 12:26 AM 4/18/2015, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:

Just one word (or paragraph) of caution about trying to supply specific URLs to 
these records that are part of a larger database collection. I have seen many 
such repositories occasionally change their internal file location structure so 
that while the URL to the home page which typically contains a “search the 
database” utility tends to not change, the specific URLs to the records 
themselves can and usually does change. In other words, you might be better 
served if you only reference the URL to the repository itself and let future 
researchers that want to view a specific record within that repository then use 
whatever search mechanisms are available to them at that future date. I suppose 
this can all

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-18 Thread Denise Moss-Fritch
Thank you Mike. However, as the third paragraph of my post describes, I neither 
support nor practice the 'no urls for details' belief.

Best,

Denise

-Original Message-
From: MikeFry [mailto:emjay...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 9:23 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database

On 2015/04/18 18:16 PM, Denise Moss-Fritch wrote:

  From the Edit the Source Detail dialog, click the Media tab. Click Add Media.
 In the Media Gallery for Source Detail for [name of Event/Fact], click
 Add Media. From the list, select Internet Website. It is on the
 Internet Website dialog that you can add the url, along with
 information that describes that url, even the date.

Quite. But as others have said, there are few things as certain in this world 
as Death and Taxes - and that detailed urls will change at some point.

--
Regards,
Mike Fry (Jhb)






Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-18 Thread John Lisle


Brian, Michelle, Barton et al,
Again, please let me be the naysayer.
With some repositories, you can be more specific than just the top level
URL. 
For instance...
If you copy a FamilySearch record with their copy button, and paste it
into a detail citation note, it will include the URL of the record and
date the record was accessioned. (Even if those URLs go bad, which I have
not seen, most web users will be able to use that to find the
record.)
As for Ancestry, I have a bookmarks page with direct links to specific
databases within ancestry that I use frequently that I setup 10+ years
ago. Those links still work. When I setup a source for, say, the 1900 US
census, I use that URL as the Call Number for the repository. I have not
tried using a URL to a specific ancestry record. 
However, you probably should reference the URL of a specific page in an
ancestry tree or WorldConnect tree, if that was your source, as those
pages could go away if the tree is removed, but will remain mostly static
while tree is present.
I have not done it, but I suspect that you can also use URL of specific
Record Collection search pages as Call Numbers also.
-- With ancestry and familysearch, the likelihood of those collection
URLs changing is now minimal for their total search product to
work.
john.

At 12:26 AM 4/18/2015, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
Just one word (or paragraph) of
caution about trying to supply specific URLs to these records that are
part of a larger database collection. I have seen many such repositories
occasionally change their internal file location structure so that while
the URL to the home page which typically contains a “search the
database” utility tends to not change, the specific URLs to the records
themselves can and usually does change. In other words, you might be
better served if you only reference the URL to the repository itself and
let future researchers that want to view a specific record within that
repository then use whatever search mechanisms are available to them at
that future date. I suppose this can all be summed in in Murphy’s
7th Law of the Universe: two things will change in the future,
your looks and Internet URLs.

Brian in CA


From: Barton Lewis
[
mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net] 
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 5:32 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database

I am finding that the SourceWriter template “internet  database”
is very good for most any internet database collection. However,
there is one problem: there is only a url field for the main
source, not one for the actual specific record within that
collection. For the collection “Virginia, Marriages, 1785-1940”
at familysearch, for example, I have multiple marriages I want to cite,
but I would like to be able to cite the url for each individual
record. Is it reasonable to ask that this source template be
revised so as to include a url in the detail?

Barton


Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support:

http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
Follow Legacy on Facebook
(
http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog
(
http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp 




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-18 Thread Denise Moss-Fritch
Barton,



I am a bit surprised that no one has mentioned the Media tab of a citation.



From the Edit the Source Detail dialog, click the Media tab. Click Add Media. 
In the Media Gallery for Source Detail for [name of Event/Fact], click Add 
Media. From the list, select Internet Website. It is on the Internet Website 
dialog that you can add the url, along with information that describes that 
url, even the date.



I too use urls for a specific online record, whether that record is from 
Ancestry, FamilySearch,  the Provincial Archives of New Brunswick, or some 
other location online. At the moment I am waiting for the next set of fixes to 
Legacy as the current version truncates (cuts short) the thousands of urls my 
GEDCOM is importing.



As for a url possibly changing in the future, our job is to record where we 
found something at that time. If we found a family Bible record in the 
possession of aunt Beth, that does not mean the old Bible will remain with her 
forever. Even county records change (old ledgers destroyed, building  burnt 
down, or records lost). I have also seen the reverse with old county history 
books, the copyright long out of date, being digitized and placed online by the 
local library.



Best,



Denise



From: BARTON LEWIS [mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:53 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Cc: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database



okay, thanks Brian and Michele.

Barton




On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 08:36 AM, Michele/Support wrote:

I agree.  I only use the main URL for the website such as 
https://familysearch.org or http://www.ancestry.com



Michele

Technical Support

 mailto:mich...@legacyfamilytree.com mich...@legacyfamilytree.com

 http://www.legacyfamilytree.com www.legacyfamilytree.com



From: Brian L. Lightfoot [mailto:br...@the-lightfoots.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:27 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database



Just one word (or paragraph) of caution about trying to supply specific URLs to 
these records that are part of a larger database collection. I have seen many 
such repositories occasionally change their internal file location structure so 
that while the URL to the home page which typically contains a “search the 
database” utility tends to not change, the specific URLs to the records 
themselves can and usually does change. In other words, you might be better 
served if you only reference the URL to the repository itself and let future 
researchers that want to view a specific record within that repository then use 
whatever search mechanisms are available to them at that future date. I suppose 
this can all be summed in in Murphy’s 7th Law of the Universe: two things will 
change in the future, your looks and Internet URLs.



Brian in CA



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-18 Thread MikeFry
On 2015/04/18 18:16 PM, Denise Moss-Fritch wrote:

  From the Edit the Source Detail dialog, click the Media tab. Click Add Media.
 In the Media Gallery for Source Detail for [name of Event/Fact], click Add
 Media. From the list, select Internet Website. It is on the Internet Website
 dialog that you can add the url, along with information that describes that 
 url,
 even the date.

Quite. But as others have said, there are few things as certain in this world as
Death and Taxes - and that detailed urls will change at some point.

--
Regards,
Mike Fry (Jhb)




Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-18 Thread Barton Lewis
Hi Denise, thanks, but here’s what’s happening:



1.I click on the marriage;

2.   The “marriage/relationship information” dialog box comes up; I click 
inside “Marr Date” and then click on “add or Edit source citations;”

3.   I click on “edit detail;”

4.   I click on “Media;”

5.   Then click on “Add media;”

6.   I click on “add Media” again and then on “internet website;”

7.   I paste the url in the Website url field; then close all boxes.



The output does not show the url.  Just the url I entered of the main website 
which I entered in the Source.



Do you know why it isn’t showing?



Thanks,



Barton



From: Denise Moss-Fritch [mailto:d.mossfri...@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:16 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database



Barton,



I am a bit surprised that no one has mentioned the Media tab of a citation.



From the Edit the Source Detail dialog, click the Media tab. Click Add Media. 
In the Media Gallery for Source Detail for [name of Event/Fact], click Add 
Media. From the list, select Internet Website. It is on the Internet Website 
dialog that you can add the url, along with information that describes that 
url, even the date.



I too use urls for a specific online record, whether that record is from 
Ancestry, FamilySearch,  the Provincial Archives of New Brunswick, or some 
other location online. At the moment I am waiting for the next set of fixes to 
Legacy as the current version truncates (cuts short) the thousands of urls my 
GEDCOM is importing.



As for a url possibly changing in the future, our job is to record where we 
found something at that time. If we found a family Bible record in the 
possession of aunt Beth, that does not mean the old Bible will remain with her 
forever. Even county records change (old ledgers destroyed, building  burnt 
down, or records lost). I have also seen the reverse with old county history 
books, the copyright long out of date, being digitized and placed online by the 
local library.



Best,



Denise



From: BARTON LEWIS [mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:53 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Cc: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database



okay, thanks Brian and Michele.

Barton




On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 08:36 AM, Michele/Support wrote:

I agree.  I only use the main URL for the website such as 
https://familysearch.org or http://www.ancestry.com



Michele

Technical Support

 mailto:mich...@legacyfamilytree.com mich...@legacyfamilytree.com

 http://www.legacyfamilytree.com www.legacyfamilytree.com



From: Brian L. Lightfoot [mailto:br...@the-lightfoots.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:27 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database



Just one word (or paragraph) of caution about trying to supply specific URLs to 
these records that are part of a larger database collection. I have seen many 
such repositories occasionally change their internal file location structure so 
that while the URL to the home page which typically contains a “search the 
database” utility tends to not change, the specific URLs to the records 
themselves can and usually does change. In other words, you might be better 
served if you only reference the URL to the repository itself and let future 
researchers that want to view a specific record within that repository then use 
whatever search mechanisms are available to them at that future date. I suppose 
this can all be summed in in Murphy’s 7th Law of the Universe: two things will 
change in the future, your looks and Internet URLs.



Brian in CA



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-18 Thread Denise Moss-Fritch
Barton,



Very interesting! You are correct. Legacy is treating the url as a graphic 
icon, not an actual Internet address. For example, if you select to print 
citation detail graphics along with the source/citation information on a family 
group record. Legacy does not print the url as an actual address in the 
source/citation, but does print the url icon. Nor, is that graphic icon an 
active link when the report is online.



Sorry, I am much more familiar with a different genealogy software that does 
allow including or not including a citation detail url as an Internet address 
in the source/citation information. Definitely not sure I like the way Legacy 
handles citation detail urls.



Denise



From: Barton Lewis [mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 1:59 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database



Hi Denise, thanks, but here’s what’s happening:



1.I click on the marriage;

2.   The “marriage/relationship information” dialog box comes up; I click 
inside “Marr Date” and then click on “add or Edit source citations;”

3.   I click on “edit detail;”

4.   I click on “Media;”

5.   Then click on “Add media;”

6.   I click on “add Media” again and then on “internet website;”

7.   I paste the url in the Website url field; then close all boxes.



The output does not show the url.  Just the url I entered of the main website 
which I entered in the Source.



Do you know why it isn’t showing?



Thanks,



Barton



From: Denise Moss-Fritch [mailto:d.mossfri...@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:16 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database



Barton,



I am a bit surprised that no one has mentioned the Media tab of a citation.



From the Edit the Source Detail dialog, click the Media tab. Click Add Media. 
In the Media Gallery for Source Detail for [name of Event/Fact], click Add 
Media. From the list, select Internet Website. It is on the Internet Website 
dialog that you can add the url, along with information that describes that 
url, even the date.



I too use urls for a specific online record, whether that record is from 
Ancestry, FamilySearch,  the Provincial Archives of New Brunswick, or some 
other location online. At the moment I am waiting for the next set of fixes to 
Legacy as the current version truncates (cuts short) the thousands of urls my 
GEDCOM is importing.



As for a url possibly changing in the future, our job is to record where we 
found something at that time. If we found a family Bible record in the 
possession of aunt Beth, that does not mean the old Bible will remain with her 
forever. Even county records change (old ledgers destroyed, building  burnt 
down, or records lost). I have also seen the reverse with old county history 
books, the copyright long out of date, being digitized and placed online by the 
local library.



Best,



Denise



From: BARTON LEWIS [mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:53 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Cc: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database



okay, thanks Brian and Michele.

Barton




On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 08:36 AM, Michele/Support wrote:

I agree.  I only use the main URL for the website such as 
https://familysearch.org or http://www.ancestry.com



Michele

Technical Support

 mailto:mich...@legacyfamilytree.com mich...@legacyfamilytree.com

 http://www.legacyfamilytree.com www.legacyfamilytree.com



From: Brian L. Lightfoot [mailto:br...@the-lightfoots.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:27 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database



Just one word (or paragraph) of caution about trying to supply specific URLs to 
these records that are part of a larger database collection. I have seen many 
such repositories occasionally change their internal file location structure so 
that while the URL to the home page which typically contains a “search the 
database” utility tends to not change, the specific URLs to the records 
themselves can and usually does change. In other words, you might be better 
served if you only reference the URL to the repository itself and let future 
researchers that want to view a specific record within that repository then use 
whatever search mechanisms are available to them at that future date. I suppose 
this can all be summed in in Murphy’s 7th Law of the Universe: two things will 
change in the future, your looks and Internet URLs.



Brian in CA



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com

Re: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-18 Thread Cathy Pinner
If you really want the specific URL to show and it doesn't seem
appropriate to put it in the credit line in the Source Detail, why not
use the Comment field and check it for printing?

There are templates that do include a URL in the source detail (eg
newspaper templates) but not the generic online database one.

Cathy

Denise Moss-Fritch wrote:

 Barton,

 Very interesting! You are correct. Legacy is treating the url as a
 graphic icon, not an actual Internet address. For example, if you
 select to print citation detail graphics along with the
 source/citation information on a family group record. Legacy does not
 print the url as an actual address in the source/citation, but does
 print the url icon. Nor, is that graphic icon an active link when the
 report is online.

 Sorry, I am much more familiar with a different genealogy software
 that does allow including or not including a citation detail url as an
 Internet address in the source/citation information. Definitely not
 sure I like the way Legacy handles citation detail urls.

 Denise

 *From:*Barton Lewis [mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net]
 *Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 1:59 PM
 *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
 *Subject:* RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database

 Hi Denise, thanks, but here’s what’s happening:

 1.I click on the marriage;

 2.The “marriage/relationship information” dialog box comes up; I click
 inside “Marr Date” and then click on “add or Edit source citations;”

 3.I click on “edit detail;”

 4.I click on “Media;”

 5.Then click on “Add media;”

 6.I click on “add Media” again and then on “internet website;”

 7.I paste the url in the Website url field; then close all boxes.

 The output does not show the url. Just the url I entered of the main
 website which I entered in the Source.

 Do you know why it isn’t showing?

 Thanks,

 Barton

 *From:*Denise Moss-Fritch [mailto:d.mossfri...@comcast.net]
 *Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:16 PM
 *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
 mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
 *Subject:* RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database

 Barton,

 I am a bit surprised that no one has mentioned the Media tab of a
 citation.

 From the Edit the Source Detail dialog, click the Media tab. Click Add
 Media. In the Media Gallery for Source Detail for [name of
 Event/Fact], click Add Media. From the list, select Internet Website.
 It is on the Internet Website dialog that you can add the url, along
 with information that describes that url, even the date.

 I too use urls for a specific online record, whether that record is
 from Ancestry, FamilySearch, the Provincial Archives of New Brunswick,
 or some other location online. At the moment I am waiting for the next
 set of fixes to Legacy as the current version truncates (cuts short)
 the thousands of urls my GEDCOM is importing.

 As for a url possibly changing in the future, our job is to record
 where we found something at that time. If we found a family Bible
 record in the possession of aunt Beth, that does not mean the old
 Bible will remain with her forever. Even county records change (old
 ledgers destroyed, building burnt down, or records lost). I have also
 seen the reverse with old county history books, the copyright long out
 of date, being digitized and placed online by the local library.

 Best,

 Denise

 *From:*BARTON LEWIS [mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net]
 *Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:53 AM
 *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
 mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
 *Cc:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
 mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
 *Subject:* RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database

 okay, thanks Brian and Michele.

 Barton




 On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 08:36 AM, Michele/Support wrote:

 I agree. I only use the main URL for the website such as
 https://familysearch.org or http://www.ancestry.com

 Michele

 Technical Support

 mich...@legacyfamilytree.com mailto:mich...@legacyfamilytree.com

 www.legacyfamilytree.com http://www.legacyfamilytree.com

 *From:* Brian L. Lightfoot [mailto:br...@the-lightfoots.com]
 *Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:27 AM
 *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
 mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
 *Subject:* RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database

 Just one word (or paragraph) of caution about trying to supply
 specific URLs to these records that are part of a larger database
 collection. I have seen many such repositories occasionally change
 their internal file location structure so that while the URL to
 the home page which typically contains a “search the database”
 utility tends to not change, the specific URLs to the records
 themselves can and usually does change. In other words, you might
 be better served if you only reference the URL to the repository
 itself and let future researchers that want to view a specific
 record within that repository then use whatever search mechanisms

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-18 Thread Barton Lewis
Thanks everyone for your feedback on this.  I agree with Denise and others who 
favor citing the record-specific url.  Doubtless there will come a time when 
the familysearch and other url’s become obsolete but until that happens, it’s 
nice to have them.  And it doesn’t hurt to have them after they become obsolete 
to show where you found the record.  Which brings me back to my original point: 
 it would be nice to have a field in the source detail where you can input the 
url.  Denise wrote about the Media field and entering a url there, but this 
just provides a link to the website; what I would like is for the url to appear 
in the source citation output.  For that, a field is needed in the detail.  I 
believe I have seen templates where there was a field in the detail for the 
url; perhaps I can use or modify a source to do this.  Can one create or 
customize source templates in Legacy?



Barton



From: John Lisle [mailto:leg...@johnlisle.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:11 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database



Brian, Michelle, Barton et al,

Again, please let me be the naysayer.

With some repositories, you can be more specific than just the top level URL.

For instance...

If you copy a FamilySearch record with their copy button, and paste it into a 
detail citation note, it will include the URL of the record and date the record 
was accessioned. (Even if those URLs go bad, which I have not seen, most web 
users will be able to use that to find the record.)

As for Ancestry, I have a bookmarks page with direct links to specific 
databases within ancestry that I use frequently that I setup 10+ years ago. 
Those links still work. When I setup a source for, say, the 1900 US census, I 
use that URL as the Call Number for the repository. I have not tried using a 
URL to a specific ancestry record.

However, you probably should reference the URL of a specific page in an 
ancestry tree or WorldConnect tree, if that was your source, as those pages 
could go away if the tree is removed, but will remain mostly static while tree 
is present.

I have not done it, but I suspect that you can also use URL of specific Record 
Collection search pages as Call Numbers also.

-- With ancestry and familysearch, the likelihood of those collection URLs 
changing is now minimal for their total search product to work.

john.


At 12:26 AM 4/18/2015, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:



Just one word (or paragraph) of caution about trying to supply specific URLs to 
these records that are part of a larger database collection. I have seen many 
such repositories occasionally change their internal file location structure so 
that while the URL to the home page which typically contains a “search the 
database” utility tends to not change, the specific URLs to the records 
themselves can and usually does change. In other words, you might be better 
served if you only reference the URL to the repository itself and let future 
researchers that want to view a specific record within that repository then use 
whatever search mechanisms are available to them at that future date. I suppose 
this can all be summed in in Murphy’s 7th Law of the Universe: two things 
will change in the future, your looks and Internet URLs.

Brian in CA


From: Barton Lewis [ mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net 
mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net ]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 5:32 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com mailto:legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database

I am finding that the SourceWriter template “internet  database” is very 
good for most any internet database collection.  However, there is one problem: 
 there is only a url field for the main source, not one for the actual specific 
record within that collection.  For the collection “Virginia, Marriages, 
1785-1940” at familysearch, for example, I have multiple marriages I want to 
cite, but I would like to be able to cite the url for each individual record.  
Is it reasonable to ask that this source template be revised so as to include a 
url in the detail?

Barton



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com 
http://support.legacyfamilytree.com/
Follow Legacy on Facebook ( http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree 
http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree ) and on our blog ( 
http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com http://news.legacyfamilytree.com/ ).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com

RE: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-17 Thread Brian L. Lightfoot
Just one word (or paragraph) of caution about trying to supply specific URLs to 
these records that are part of a larger database collection. I have seen many 
such repositories occasionally change their internal file location structure so 
that while the URL to the home page which typically contains a “search the 
database” utility tends to not change, the specific URLs to the records 
themselves can and usually does change. In other words, you might be better 
served if you only reference the URL to the repository itself and let future 
researchers that want to view a specific record within that repository then use 
whatever search mechanisms are available to them at that future date. I suppose 
this can all be summed in in Murphy’s 7th Law of the Universe: two things will 
change in the future, your looks and Internet URLs.



Brian in CA





From: Barton Lewis [mailto:bartonle...@optonline.net]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 5:32 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet  database



I am finding that the SourceWriter template “internet  database” is very good 
for most any internet database collection.  However, there is one problem:  
there is only a url field for the main source, not one for the actual specific 
record within that collection.  For the collection “Virginia, Marriages, 
1785-1940” at familysearch, for example, I have multiple marriages I want to 
cite, but I would like to be able to cite the url for each individual record.  
Is it reasonable to ask that this source template be revised so as to include a 
url in the detail?



Barton







Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


[LegacyUG] SourceWriter: internet database

2015-04-17 Thread Barton Lewis
I am finding that the SourceWriter template internet  database is very
good for most any internet database collection.  However, there is one
problem:  there is only a url field for the main source, not one for the
actual specific record within that collection.  For the collection
Virginia, Marriages, 1785-1940 at familysearch, for example, I have
multiple marriages I want to cite, but I would like to be able to cite the
url for each individual record.  Is it reasonable to ask that this source
template be revised so as to include a url in the detail?



Barton





Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp