Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-05-24 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Joe Orr  wrote:

> Just posted an updated version.
>
> New features:
>
> * D3 Trees
> * Nested menus
> * Subtrees (node can point to another Leo file)
> * Works with trunkless trees now
>
> https://github.com/kaleguy/leoviewer
>
​
Many thanks for this work.​

I was going to use the LeoDocs file as a demo, but it has a lot of rst
> panes, and Leoviewer doesn't support rst.
>

​Not sure what you mean by "rst pane". There are many @rst trees, which you
can optionally render in the viewrendered pane.
​

> Is it simple to convert those to md or html?
>
​
There are several possible answers:

1. You can use the rst3 command to convert one or more @rst3 trees to
.rst.txt files in leo/doc/html.  Then, from that directory, you can use
"make html". This assumes you have sphinx installed.

2. Leo doesn't have a command like the rst3 command to make markdown files.
Instead, you can use @auto-md to create .md files. There are several
examples in leo/doc/leoDocs.leo.

*Important*: At present, you have to generate tables of contents "by hand",
using the "make-md-toc" button. That is, you select the root of a tree you
for which you want the toc and press the button.  The button writes the toc
to the console. You copy it from the console to the desired location in the
outline.  Saving the outline causes @auto-md to write the toc.

It wouldn't be too hard have "@button make-md-toc" do more automatically.
Suppose we define a "placeholder" directive, say @md-toc.  The script could
replace @md-toc with the generated toc...

Still not sure whether I have answered your question :-) I'd be happy to
discuss this further.  Leo really should have better support for markdown.
The markdown analog of the rst3 command would be *much* simpler than the
rst3 code.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-05-24 Thread Joe Orr
Just posted an updated version.

New features:

* D3 Trees
* Nested menus
* Subtrees (node can point to another Leo file)
* Works with trunkless trees now

https://github.com/kaleguy/leoviewer

Edward, this one is fairly stable so you can link to it if you want.

I was going to use the LeoDocs file as a demo, but it has a lot of rst 
panes, and Leoviewer doesn't support rst. Is it simple to convert those to 
md or html?

Still need to make the SEO/static feature + search, but going to pause to 
generate some content. Working on converting the Shakespeare files now.

Joe

On Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 11:42:54 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 8:54:31 AM UTC-5, Kent Tenney wrote:
>>
>> I've done some work with Brython, really cool code, heavily developed, 
>> good community.
>>
>
> Good to know.  I'll check into it.
>
> I've just made a note that the html importer should preserve indentation 
> with 

Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-27 Thread Edward K. Ream


On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 8:54:31 AM UTC-5, Kent Tenney wrote:
>
> I've done some work with Brython, really cool code, heavily developed, 
> good community.
>

Good to know.  I'll check into it.

I've just made a note that the html importer should preserve indentation 
with 

Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-25 Thread Kent Tenney
I've done some work with Brython, really cool code, heavily developed,
good community.

As I understand, Brython is further distanced from JS than Transcript,
more thoroughly Pythonic. Better for me, maybe not as good for
someone knowing JS.

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Edward K. Ream  wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Eric S. Johansson  > wrote:
>
> you do know about brython (python 3 in browser)?  it keeps me from having
>> to touch too much JS but still lets me interoperate with it when I need to.
>>  if you want a browser based leo, it may be a place to start.
>>
>
> ​Thanks for this link.  And this stack overflow page
>  discusses the pros and cons
> between brython and transcript .​
>
> ​I hadn't heard of either brython or transcript before today :-)
>
> Edward
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "leo-editor" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-25 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Eric S. Johansson 
wrote:

you do know about brython (python 3 in browser)?  it keeps me from having
> to touch too much JS but still lets me interoperate with it when I need to.
>  if you want a browser based leo, it may be a place to start.
>

​Thanks for this link.  And this stack overflow page
 discusses the pros and cons
between brython and transcript .​

​I hadn't heard of either brython or transcript before today :-)

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-24 Thread Eric S. Johansson


On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 7:50:45 PM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> Hehe. As much as possible of Leo's existing python code must remain.  I'll 
> reject any proposal to rewrite, say, leoAtFile.py or leoNodes.py in js. Leo 
> is, after all, about Python first.
>

you do know about brython (python 3 in browser)?  it keeps me from having 
to touch too much JS but still lets me interoperate with it when I need to. 
 if you want a browser based leo, it may be a place to start.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-22 Thread Joe Orr
OK, got a few more features added.

- Drag and Drop
- Inline View (switch by menu icon upper right)
- Animation
- Navigation (buttons on sibling pages, history buttons on menubar)
- Pass in filename as parameter

I watched the Engelbart video and thought it would be good to add inline 
view. I'm not sure the design is perfect, feedback welcome. I figured 
inline mode needs animated open/close or it is too confusing, so I added 
that. 

I need to add the following before it is ready to promote:
- search
- SEO version (create static files)
- D3 tree
- Include sub leo file (load in leo file from node)
- Accordion mode toggle (opening a node causes all other nodes to close 
except ancestor nodes)
- Some more docs

Those are pretty straightforward so probably ready in a couple of weeks. 
Plus it needs more testing. Bug reports very welcome. 

Also anyone got any nice example trees? You can DnD the file onto Leo 
viewer, if it breaks, make a branch on Github and put the file in 
src/static/examples and I'll fix.

Edward, any suggestions on Leo files to put into Leo Viewer for demo 
purposes? 

Joe

On Saturday, April 8, 2017 at 9:41:58 AM UTC-4, Joe Orr wrote:
>
> Let's wait a week or two while I test and add a couple of features. The 
> install instructions for Leo need to be updated too, will post separately 
> about that. Also, running into problems now with @clean nodes, will do 
> separate post.
>
> Joe
>
> On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 8:17:06 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Joe Orr  wrote:
>>
>>> It doesn't have any file upload capability. In fact it the filename 
>>> (docs.leo) is hardcoded and expected to be in a particular place.
>>>
>>
>> ​Fair enough.  I'd like to link from Leo's home page to your intro to Leo 
>> ​asap. Is the url stable enough to use now?
>>
>> Come to think of it, might be worth considering moving the leo site to 
>>> Github pages if you haven't already thought about that. That way the site 
>>> can be an open source project as well. 
>>>
>>
>> ​I'll consider it.
>>
>> Edward
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-08 Thread Joe Orr
Let's wait a week or two while I test and add a couple of features. The 
install instructions for Leo need to be updated too, will post separately 
about that. Also, running into problems now with @clean nodes, will do 
separate post.

Joe

On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 8:17:06 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Joe Orr  
> wrote:
>
>> It doesn't have any file upload capability. In fact it the filename 
>> (docs.leo) is hardcoded and expected to be in a particular place.
>>
>
> ​Fair enough.  I'd like to link from Leo's home page to your intro to Leo 
> ​asap. Is the url stable enough to use now?
>
> Come to think of it, might be worth considering moving the leo site to 
>> Github pages if you haven't already thought about that. That way the site 
>> can be an open source project as well. 
>>
>
> ​I'll consider it.
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-05 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Joe Orr  wrote:

> It doesn't have any file upload capability. In fact it the filename
> (docs.leo) is hardcoded and expected to be in a particular place.
>

​Fair enough.  I'd like to link from Leo's home page to your intro to Leo
​asap. Is the url stable enough to use now?

Come to think of it, might be worth considering moving the leo site to
> Github pages if you haven't already thought about that. That way the site
> can be an open source project as well.
>

​I'll consider it.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-03 Thread Joe Orr
BTW, just thought I'd mention that the code for Leo Viewer will all 
eventually be in the same Leo file with copious explanations. Not doing 
that yet because too much missing and code needs to be moved around a lot. 
I'm going to document another small but complete project of mine as a test 
case.

On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 9:07:58 PM UTC-4, Joe Orr wrote:
>
> It doesn't have any file upload capability. In fact it the filename 
> (docs.leo) is hardcoded and expected to be in a particular place.
>
> I'll be adding upload capability etc soon but in meantime, you have to run 
> it from a server. Easiest way to do that is to fork it and run from github 
> pages. I added a couple sentences to the installation section. Let me know 
> if I should add more to make it clearer.
>
> What it is useful for already is to document a Github project. Just copy 
> the files in the dist folder to the docs folder, turn on github pages, and 
> that's your project home page. 
>
> Come to think of it, might be worth considering moving the leo site to 
> Github pages if you haven't already thought about that. That way the site 
> can be an open source project as well. 
>
> Joe 
>
> On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 5:57:08 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Joe Orr  wrote:
>>
>>> OK I have something at least minimally useful posted to Github for the 
>>> Leo Viewer (HTML 5 Viewer) project.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/kaleguy/leoviewer
>>>
>>
>> ​Wow.  This is a *superb *introduction to Leo. There should be a 
>> prominent link to it on Leo's home page.​
>>
>>
>> The live version is here:
>>> https://kaleguy.github.io/leoviewer/#/
>>>
>>
>> ​When I drag, say, CheatSheet.leo to the live page I get a message:
>>
>> This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated 
>> with it. The document tree is shown below.  Is this what you expect?
>>  
>>
>>> Edward, would it be possible to get leoeditor.com working with https? I 
>>> was going to put some pages from the site into the outline, but Github 
>>> pages hosts on https, so I can call insecure content.
>>>
>>
>> ​My brother Speed hosts Leo's site.  I'll ask him.
>>
>> Edward
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-03 Thread Joe Orr
It doesn't have any file upload capability. In fact it the filename 
(docs.leo) is hardcoded and expected to be in a particular place.

I'll be adding upload capability etc soon but in meantime, you have to run 
it from a server. Easiest way to do that is to fork it and run from github 
pages. I added a couple sentences to the installation section. Let me know 
if I should add more to make it clearer.

What it is useful for already is to document a Github project. Just copy 
the files in the dist folder to the docs folder, turn on github pages, and 
that's your project home page. 

Come to think of it, might be worth considering moving the leo site to 
Github pages if you haven't already thought about that. That way the site 
can be an open source project as well. 

Joe 

On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 5:57:08 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Joe Orr  
> wrote:
>
>> OK I have something at least minimally useful posted to Github for the 
>> Leo Viewer (HTML 5 Viewer) project.
>>
>> https://github.com/kaleguy/leoviewer
>>
>
> ​Wow.  This is a *superb *introduction to Leo. There should be a 
> prominent link to it on Leo's home page.​
>
>
> The live version is here:
>> https://kaleguy.github.io/leoviewer/#/
>>
>
> ​When I drag, say, CheatSheet.leo to the live page I get a message:
>
> This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated 
> with it. The document tree is shown below.  Is this what you expect?
>  
>
>> Edward, would it be possible to get leoeditor.com working with https? I 
>> was going to put some pages from the site into the outline, but Github 
>> pages hosts on https, so I can call insecure content.
>>
>
> ​My brother Speed hosts Leo's site.  I'll ask him.
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-03 Thread Joe Orr
An actual gravestone in Park Slope.

I own this company: www.thekalefactory.com, that's why the moniker. Doesn't 
pay the bills though so still have a software day job. 

Joe

On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 6:08:12 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> On Sunday, April 2, 2017 at 8:31:36 PM UTC-5, Joe Orr wrote:
>>
>> OK I have something at least minimally useful posted to Github for the 
>> Leo Viewer (HTML 5 Viewer) project.
>>
>> https://github.com/kaleguy/leoviewer
>>
>
> So, kale guy, this 
> is
>  
> one of my favorite New Yorker cartoons. Hehe.
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-03 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sunday, April 2, 2017 at 8:31:36 PM UTC-5, Joe Orr wrote:
>
> OK I have something at least minimally useful posted to Github for the Leo 
> Viewer (HTML 5 Viewer) project.
>
> https://github.com/kaleguy/leoviewer
>

So, kale guy, this 
is
 
one of my favorite New Yorker cartoons. Hehe.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-03 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Joe Orr  wrote:

> OK I have something at least minimally useful posted to Github for the Leo
> Viewer (HTML 5 Viewer) project.
>
> https://github.com/kaleguy/leoviewer
>

​Wow.  This is a *superb *introduction to Leo. There should be a prominent
link to it on Leo's home page.​


The live version is here:
> https://kaleguy.github.io/leoviewer/#/
>

​When I drag, say, CheatSheet.leo to the live page I get a message:

This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with
it. The document tree is shown below.  Is this what you expect?


> Edward, would it be possible to get leoeditor.com working with https? I
> was going to put some pages from the site into the outline, but Github
> pages hosts on https, so I can call insecure content.
>

​My brother Speed hosts Leo's site.  I'll ask him.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-04-02 Thread Joe Orr
OK I have something at least minimally useful posted to Github for the Leo 
Viewer (HTML 5 Viewer) project.

https://github.com/kaleguy/leoviewer

The live version is here:
https://kaleguy.github.io/leoviewer/#/

I have only tested it in Chrome with simple outlines, so there are probably 
files out there that will not display properly. I'll see if I can add an 
upload version soon but in the meantime in order to try it you have to 
download it. Anyone out there that tries it and has problems let me know, 
looking for good test cases.

Edward, would it be possible to get leoeditor.com working with https? I was 
going to put some pages from the site into the outline, but Github pages 
hosts on https, so I can call insecure content.

Joe

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-03-07 Thread john lunzer
Last time I used Atom this was one of my big complaints, though these days 
I feel like most editors have performance issues in one way or another.

On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 11:46:09 AM UTC-5, Arjan wrote:
>
> Regarding Atom, it might be interesting to take a look at Visual Studio 
> Code as well https://code.visualstudio.com. Very similar, also an 
> Electron app, but much faster opening of large files, and more snappy in 
> general (unless Atom improved a lot recently).
>
> Arjan
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-03-07 Thread Arjan
Regarding Atom, it might be interesting to take a look at Visual Studio 
Code as well https://code.visualstudio.com. Very similar, also an Electron 
app, but much faster opening of large files, and more snappy in general 
(unless Atom improved a lot recently).

Arjan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-03-06 Thread Joe Orr
I took a look at the Flexx website, says it's in alpha... I'll leave that 
to you Python experts, I'm all in on JS ;-)

I'll get something posted to Github this week or next. I think a standalone 
Leo Viewer project will have some advantages regardless separate from the 
Leo program itself. But I'm guessing it will be fairly easy to make a 
restful server with node + Leo (Python) at some point in which case some of 
the client code could end up being an alternate front end for Leo. Or the 
server would be a way to bring Leo's core functionality into Atom. I'll 
take a stab at after I get the Leo Viewer to a useful point. Atom / 
Electron are basically just a package of browser + node.

BTW, while we're on the topic of awesome open source web components, don't 
forget https://ace.c9.io/#nav=about

Yes, was looking at Vuex and will probably use it, although the viewer 
might not have a lot of state to track.

Joe



On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 8:52:43 AM UTC-5, john lunzer wrote:
>
> The differentiating factor in using Flexx rather than building the UI 
> elements directly in Javascript is the "talking to" part. The Flexx UI 
> Framework has built up a robust two way communication system between Python 
> and JS which I think would be difficult to replicate. 
>
> I'm not trying to derail your enthusiasm, but I wouldn't want you to spend 
> your personal time on something where a reasonable solution may already 
> exist. Although if you're more comfortable in JS than Python Flexx may be a 
> non-starter.
>
> Anyway, I'm excited to see what comes out of your work.
>
> On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 8:30:16 AM UTC-5, john lunzer wrote:
>>
>> There is certainly a lot to think about here. As Edward stated, keeping 
>> up with the Javascript world is a daunting task if you've already deeply 
>> immersed in a whole other world. 
>>
>> To address your OP, there is currently a long term goal of investigating 
>> using Flexx to build a web-based GUI for Leo 
>> . It's definitely 
>> long term, there are plenty of other priorities in Leo's core. I encourage 
>> you to take a look at Flexx as well as the JS GUI Widget framework it is 
>> built on, Phosphor . While 
>> Phosphor is not yet super popular I predict its popularity will rise when 
>> JupyterLab  (which is also 
>> built on Phosphor) comes out of alpha. 
>>
>> As you can see there is a strong desire in the Python universe to harness 
>> web-based GUIs.
>>
>> If you plan on using Vue and your project grows to any reasonable size 
>> then I encourage you take a look at Vuex 
>>  which offers some tools and 
>> constructs to help organize Vue projects.
>>
>> On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 5:36:19 AM UTC-5, Joe Orr wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the welcome back!
>>>
>>> A few more thoughts on this topic:
>>>
>>> Cool trees is D3 v4:
>>> https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/e9ba78a2c1070980d1b530800ce7fa2b
>>> https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/4063550
>>>
>>> I'll get the Leo Viewer project up and running within a week or so on 
>>> Github. 
>>>
>>> I'm currently working in full stack node development with Angular / Vue 
>>> on front end + D3 at moment so I should be able to leverage some of that. 
>>> Vue seems better for this project than Angular.
>>>
>>> I'm thinking the Leo Viewer could be used to generate some nice display 
>>> examples from Leo generated content. Could be a good way to introduce more 
>>> people to Leo. Besides D3 there are other HTML5 components that could be 
>>> added fairly easily. For example I'm also thinking it would be cool to have 
>>> reveal.js make a slide show out of a subtree.
>>>
>>> Once the viewer is useful, it is simple to make an Electron version, 
>>> which makes it a complete cross platform desktop app:
>>> https://electron.atom.io/
>>>
>>> And once that is working, the viewer could become an alternate front end 
>>> to the existing Leo program by wrapping Leo in a node server. Node can talk 
>>> to Python.
>>>
>>> Another thing to think about down the road is making a version of Leo 
>>> from Atom, basically a similar technique (wrap Python in node).
>>> https://github.com/atom/atom. Already thought of a good name for it: 
>>> @Leo :-)
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 5:06:25 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:



 On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Edward K. Ream  
 wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Joe Orr  wrote:
>
>> D3 demo:
>> https://bl.ocks.org/kaleguy/57266b6fff9f864403e007e9efd06401
>>
>> ​Excellent!​
>

 ​I've just purchased the ebook you referenced: d3.js tips and tricks.  
 One reason I did so was to test out the leanp
 https://leanpub.com/bookstoreub distribution.  Impressive.

 I guess I have to resign myself to always being 

Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-03-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 7:52:43 AM UTC-6, john lunzer wrote:

The differentiating factor in using Flexx rather than building the UI 
> elements directly in Javascript is the "talking to" part. The Flexx UI 
> Framework has built up a robust two way communication system between Python 
> and JS which I think would be difficult to replicate. 
>

That sounds extremely useful. This is going to be the year of client/server 
Leo. How that plays out is mysterious at present.

wouldn't [you want] to spend your personal time on something where a 
> reasonable solution may already exist.
>

Oh yes, definitely.

Although if you're more comfortable in JS than Python Flexx may be a 
> non-starter.
>

Hehe. As much as possible of Leo's existing python code must remain.  I'll 
reject any proposal to rewrite, say, leoAtFile.py or leoNodes.py in js. Leo 
is, after all, about Python first.

A browser-based gui does have advantages.  For example, atom supports many 
languages. (Do Ctrl-Shift-L to see them.) Atom proves that syntax coloring 
in js can be very fast.  Furthermore, Atom's syntax coloring supports true 
solarized colors.  That is, selected text is shown correctly.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-03-06 Thread john lunzer
The differentiating factor in using Flexx rather than building the UI 
elements directly in Javascript is the "talking to" part. The Flexx UI 
Framework has built up a robust two way communication system between Python 
and JS which I think would be difficult to replicate. 

I'm not trying to derail your enthusiasm, but I wouldn't want you to spend 
your personal time on something where a reasonable solution may already 
exist. Although if you're more comfortable in JS than Python Flexx may be a 
non-starter.

Anyway, I'm excited to see what comes out of your work.

On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 8:30:16 AM UTC-5, john lunzer wrote:
>
> There is certainly a lot to think about here. As Edward stated, keeping up 
> with the Javascript world is a daunting task if you've already deeply 
> immersed in a whole other world. 
>
> To address your OP, there is currently a long term goal of investigating 
> using Flexx to build a web-based GUI for Leo 
> . It's definitely 
> long term, there are plenty of other priorities in Leo's core. I encourage 
> you to take a look at Flexx as well as the JS GUI Widget framework it is 
> built on, Phosphor . While 
> Phosphor is not yet super popular I predict its popularity will rise when 
> JupyterLab  (which is also 
> built on Phosphor) comes out of alpha. 
>
> As you can see there is a strong desire in the Python universe to harness 
> web-based GUIs.
>
> If you plan on using Vue and your project grows to any reasonable size 
> then I encourage you take a look at Vuex 
>  which offers some tools and 
> constructs to help organize Vue projects.
>
> On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 5:36:19 AM UTC-5, Joe Orr wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the welcome back!
>>
>> A few more thoughts on this topic:
>>
>> Cool trees is D3 v4:
>> https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/e9ba78a2c1070980d1b530800ce7fa2b
>> https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/4063550
>>
>> I'll get the Leo Viewer project up and running within a week or so on 
>> Github. 
>>
>> I'm currently working in full stack node development with Angular / Vue 
>> on front end + D3 at moment so I should be able to leverage some of that. 
>> Vue seems better for this project than Angular.
>>
>> I'm thinking the Leo Viewer could be used to generate some nice display 
>> examples from Leo generated content. Could be a good way to introduce more 
>> people to Leo. Besides D3 there are other HTML5 components that could be 
>> added fairly easily. For example I'm also thinking it would be cool to have 
>> reveal.js make a slide show out of a subtree.
>>
>> Once the viewer is useful, it is simple to make an Electron version, 
>> which makes it a complete cross platform desktop app:
>> https://electron.atom.io/
>>
>> And once that is working, the viewer could become an alternate front end 
>> to the existing Leo program by wrapping Leo in a node server. Node can talk 
>> to Python.
>>
>> Another thing to think about down the road is making a version of Leo 
>> from Atom, basically a similar technique (wrap Python in node).
>> https://github.com/atom/atom. Already thought of a good name for it: 
>> @Leo :-)
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 5:06:25 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Edward K. Ream  
>>> wrote:
>>>
 On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Joe Orr  wrote:

> D3 demo:
> https://bl.ocks.org/kaleguy/57266b6fff9f864403e007e9efd06401
>
> ​Excellent!​

>>>
>>> ​I've just purchased the ebook you referenced: d3.js tips and tricks.  
>>> One reason I did so was to test out the leanp
>>> https://leanpub.com/bookstoreub distribution.  Impressive.
>>>
>>> I guess I have to resign myself to always being a bit behind 
>>> .
>>>
>>> Edward
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-03-06 Thread john lunzer
There is certainly a lot to think about here. As Edward stated, keeping up 
with the Javascript world is a daunting task if you've already deeply 
immersed in a whole other world. 

To address your OP, there is currently a long term goal of investigating 
using Flexx to build a web-based GUI for Leo 
. It's definitely long 
term, there are plenty of other priorities in Leo's core. I encourage you 
to take a look at Flexx as well as the JS GUI Widget framework it is built 
on, Phosphor . While Phosphor is 
not yet super popular I predict its popularity will rise when JupyterLab 
 (which is also built on 
Phosphor) comes out of alpha. 

As you can see there is a strong desire in the Python universe to harness 
web-based GUIs.

If you plan on using Vue and your project grows to any reasonable size then 
I encourage you take a look at Vuex  
which 
offers some tools and constructs to help organize Vue projects.

On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 5:36:19 AM UTC-5, Joe Orr wrote:
>
> Thanks for the welcome back!
>
> A few more thoughts on this topic:
>
> Cool trees is D3 v4:
> https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/e9ba78a2c1070980d1b530800ce7fa2b
> https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/4063550
>
> I'll get the Leo Viewer project up and running within a week or so on 
> Github. 
>
> I'm currently working in full stack node development with Angular / Vue on 
> front end + D3 at moment so I should be able to leverage some of that. Vue 
> seems better for this project than Angular.
>
> I'm thinking the Leo Viewer could be used to generate some nice display 
> examples from Leo generated content. Could be a good way to introduce more 
> people to Leo. Besides D3 there are other HTML5 components that could be 
> added fairly easily. For example I'm also thinking it would be cool to have 
> reveal.js make a slide show out of a subtree.
>
> Once the viewer is useful, it is simple to make an Electron version, which 
> makes it a complete cross platform desktop app:
> https://electron.atom.io/
>
> And once that is working, the viewer could become an alternate front end 
> to the existing Leo program by wrapping Leo in a node server. Node can talk 
> to Python.
>
> Another thing to think about down the road is making a version of Leo from 
> Atom, basically a similar technique (wrap Python in node).
> https://github.com/atom/atom. Already thought of a good name for it: @Leo 
> :-)
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 5:06:25 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Edward K. Ream  wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Joe Orr  wrote:
>>>
 D3 demo:
 https://bl.ocks.org/kaleguy/57266b6fff9f864403e007e9efd06401

 ​Excellent!​
>>>
>>
>> ​I've just purchased the ebook you referenced: d3.js tips and tricks.  
>> One reason I did so was to test out the leanp
>> https://leanpub.com/bookstoreub distribution.  Impressive.
>>
>> I guess I have to resign myself to always being a bit behind 
>> .
>>
>> Edward
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-03-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Joe Orr  wrote:

> Thanks for the welcome back!
>

​You're welcome. It's truly great to have you back.​


>
> A few more thoughts on this topic:
>
> Cool trees is D3 v4:
> https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/e9ba78a2c1070980d1b530800ce7fa2b
> https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/4063550
>

​Impressive.  These kinds of radial trees are common in genetics.​


> I'll get the Leo Viewer project up and running within a week or so on
> Github.
>
> I'm currently working in full stack node development with Angular / Vue on
> front end + D3 at moment so I should be able to leverage some of that. Vue
> seems better for this project than Angular.
>

​I hadn't heard about either d3 or vue until yesterday. ​

​Keeping up with the js world seems like another full-time job.
​

> I'm thinking the Leo Viewer could be used to generate some nice display
> examples from Leo generated content. Could be a good way to introduce more
> people to Leo.
>

​The lack of pizazz in Leo's intro is a kinda like the weather.  Easy to
complain about it.  Glad to see you have plans to do something about it ;-)
​

Besides D3 there are other HTML5 components that could be added fairly
> easily. For example I'm also thinking it would be cool to have reveal.js
> make a slide show out of a subtree.
>

​Yet another thing to google.  Great stuff.​


>
> Once the viewer is useful, it is simple to make an Electron version, which
> makes it a complete cross platform desktop app:
> https://electron.atom.io/
>

​Wow.  This video
 from the
atom page explains the idea.​


And once that is working, the viewer could become an alternate front end to
> the existing Leo program by wrapping Leo in a node server. Node can talk to
> Python.
>

​On the agenda for this year is incorporating pyzo's 
client-server architecture (yoton
) into Leo.​

​ Not sure how this relates to a node server.​  Maybe electron/atom will
replace that goal.

Another thing to think about down the road is making a version of Leo from
> Atom, basically a similar technique (wrap Python in node).
> https://github.com/atom/atom. Already thought of a good name for it: @Leo
> :-)
>

​Alright then. We have our work cut out for us!  Many thanks, Joe, for all
these great ideas.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-03-06 Thread Joe Orr
Thanks for the welcome back!

A few more thoughts on this topic:

Cool trees is D3 v4:
https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/e9ba78a2c1070980d1b530800ce7fa2b
https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/4063550

I'll get the Leo Viewer project up and running within a week or so on 
Github. 

I'm currently working in full stack node development with Angular / Vue on 
front end + D3 at moment so I should be able to leverage some of that. Vue 
seems better for this project than Angular.

I'm thinking the Leo Viewer could be used to generate some nice display 
examples from Leo generated content. Could be a good way to introduce more 
people to Leo. Besides D3 there are other HTML5 components that could be 
added fairly easily. For example I'm also thinking it would be cool to have 
reveal.js make a slide show out of a subtree.

Once the viewer is useful, it is simple to make an Electron version, which 
makes it a complete cross platform desktop app:
https://electron.atom.io/

And once that is working, the viewer could become an alternate front end to 
the existing Leo program by wrapping Leo in a node server. Node can talk to 
Python.

Another thing to think about down the road is making a version of Leo from 
Atom, basically a similar technique (wrap Python in node).
https://github.com/atom/atom. Already thought of a good name for it: @Leo 
:-)

Joe



On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 5:06:25 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Edward K. Ream  > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Joe Orr  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> D3 demo:
>>> https://bl.ocks.org/kaleguy/57266b6fff9f864403e007e9efd06401
>>>
>>> ​Excellent!​
>>
>
> ​I've just purchased the ebook you referenced: d3.js tips and tricks.  One 
> reason I did so was to test out the leanphttps://leanpub.com/bookstoreub 
> distribution.  Impressive.
>
> I guess I have to resign myself to always being a bit behind 
> .
>
> Edward
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-03-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Edward K. Ream  wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Joe Orr  wrote:
>
>> D3 demo:
>> https://bl.ocks.org/kaleguy/57266b6fff9f864403e007e9efd06401
>>
>> ​Excellent!​
>

​I've just purchased the ebook you referenced: d3.js tips and tricks.  One
reason I did so was to test out the leanphttps://leanpub.com/bookstoreub
distribution.  Impressive.

I guess I have to resign myself to always being a bit behind
.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-03-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Joe Orr  wrote:

> D3 demo:
> https://bl.ocks.org/kaleguy/57266b6fff9f864403e007e9efd06401
>
> ​Excellent!​

​So good to have you back contributing to Leo.  I'll be studying what you
have done closely.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-03-06 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Joe Orr  wrote:

I stopped using Leo for development a few years back because of problems
> with sentinel lines. However, I recently got back into contracting and
> needed a tool to find my around a convoluted codebase, so tried out Leo. I
> realized that with @clean nodes the sentinel line problem has been fixed,
> which is a very big deal indeed.
>

​Well Joe Orr, so good to have you back with us. I've missed you and your
many ideas.

Anyway, have been thinking about using Leo to make some outlining documents
> I can share with others, just for viewing. For example a web page with an
> outline menu.
>
> Here is a start:
> https://bl.ocks.org/kaleguy/cef095e16e147bc04dd6c5812d732fb2
>
> To see the gist, click on the link at top of page.
>
> I'd like to make this into a Vue.js project on Github unless someone has
> already got something similar in development.
>

​The only thing similar is this page ,
based on leo_to_html.xsl, which I think is pretty feeble. Your expertise
and experience in this area are far greater than mine.

The idea is a standalone browser-based reader of Leo and MD files which
> uses some of those cool HTML5 components, like highlight, D3 trees, rich
> grids, presentation components etc. Also an Electron version.
>
> This could potentially become an alternate front end for Leo, by wrapping
> the existing Leo in a node server.
>
> I think I might have written the original HTML export stylesheet way back
> when and this uses a similar approach but converts to JSON in order to use
> some existing components and Vue. Next up is a version with a D3 tree.
>
​
I'll be googling to learn what all this means ;-) Again, it's great to have
you back.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: HTML 5 Leo Viewer

2017-03-06 Thread Joe Orr
D3 demo:
https://bl.ocks.org/kaleguy/57266b6fff9f864403e007e9efd06401

Joe


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.