Re: [lfs-support] TLDP LFS Guide
lfs-support.neophyte_...@ordinaryamerican.net wrote: > I've started trying to use LFS 7.4. > > As usual with these things, I took a tangent and went looking for Internet > references outside of www.LinuxFromScratch.org. > > Does anyone within the LFS project maintain The Linux Documentation Project > LFS Guide, http://www.tldp.org/guides.html#lfs or is that done by someone > attached to TLDP? TLDP's information is out-of-date. It refers to version > 6.1.1. That reference *is* the book as it was written for LFS 6.1.1. I once tried to get them to list BLFS (I think around 2005), but they got too fussy about the license. I didn't see the value. A lot of their stuff is quite out of date. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] TLDP LFS Guide
I've started trying to use LFS 7.4. As usual with these things, I took a tangent and went looking for Internet references outside of www.LinuxFromScratch.org. Does anyone within the LFS project maintain The Linux Documentation Project LFS Guide, http://www.tldp.org/guides.html#lfs or is that done by someone attached to TLDP? TLDP's information is out-of-date. It refers to version 6.1.1. TIA, NeoPhyte_Rep -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.4
On 11/29/2013 07:23 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Baho Utot wrote: >>> Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink? >>> >>> I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies. >>> >>> I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout >>> that i686 has ie without the lib64 directories >> I really don't know but I can make some guesses. uname --machine gives >> x86_64. I wouldn't be suprised if some packages that assume a multilib >> system use that value to insist on /lib64 or /usr/lib64. >> >> -- Bruce > Cross-LFS has always done that for pure64. It's a _long_ while > since I last built clfs x86_64-64 and many things have changed, but > the main difference is that clfs still uses a specfile - their build > is now quite different from how LFS has evolved. > > If you do something like that, then yes, a few _blfs_ packages will > probably get confused by the absence of /lib64. OTOH, you would get > a nice clean system - but the build for x86_64 will be somewhat > different from what is currently in LFS. > > I've a feeling that someone, perhaps our late colleague Andy, used > to build 64-bit LFS without the symlink - but I've no idea of the > details about how to do it (and that was before libstdc++ and g++ > became required for building gcc, so the details would have to change > for gcc-4.8). > > This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds. > > ĸen The following packages are the only ones I have found ( in Chapter 5 ) that either puts something into or requires /lib64 binutils-pass-1 gcc-pass-1 libstdc++ binutils-pass-2 gcc-pass-2 I have not gotten to chapter 6 I have just downloaded clfs and I am building the books now. Once that completes I will have a look at that to see how the x86_64 pure 64 bit system is built. It looks like ( I could be wrong ) the /lib64 and /usr/lib64 are not used there. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.4
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: > > Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink? > > > > I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies. > > > > I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout > > that i686 has ie without the lib64 directories > > I really don't know but I can make some guesses. uname --machine gives > x86_64. I wouldn't be suprised if some packages that assume a multilib > system use that value to insist on /lib64 or /usr/lib64. > >-- Bruce Cross-LFS has always done that for pure64. It's a _long_ while since I last built clfs x86_64-64 and many things have changed, but the main difference is that clfs still uses a specfile - their build is now quite different from how LFS has evolved. If you do something like that, then yes, a few _blfs_ packages will probably get confused by the absence of /lib64. OTOH, you would get a nice clean system - but the build for x86_64 will be somewhat different from what is currently in LFS. I've a feeling that someone, perhaps our late colleague Andy, used to build 64-bit LFS without the symlink - but I've no idea of the details about how to do it (and that was before libstdc++ and g++ became required for building gcc, so the details would have to change for gcc-4.8). This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, wrote: > On 2013-11-29 18:26, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > alex@xfsmail.comwrote: > > My real point is this one. Bash-3.2 (/bin/sh should be a symbolic or hard > link to bash) I think maybe it means /bin/sh should be /bin/bash ( /bin/sh > -> /bin/bash) but mine is ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ). ( /bin/sh -> > /bin/bash ) = ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ) are they same? > > The normal place for bash is /bin because in the case of a separate /usr > partition it will not be available. A separate /usr partition is very > rare because disk drives are quite large and is not needed. > > What you have should work fine with regards to bash. > >-- Bruce > > Sorry I not really understand that Bruce, alright this is more clear. > > > The requirement is ( /bin/bash ) but I have ( /usr/bin/bash ). > Can I use ( /usr/bin/bash ) ? > or I should change it to ( /bin/bash ) ? > /usr/bin/bash should be ok as long as /bin/sh points to it > > I still get no clue on search engines, maybe there is command to change it > ? Any help please! > > # ALEX # > > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] lfs 7.4 / Section 6 - Building the LFS System as sudo?
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:56 AM, frozen tuesday wrote: > Hello all -- > > Thanks to the help I have received here or elsewhere, I have made it as > far as section III in the online instructions: "Building the LFS System". > > I am using Linux Mint 15 as my host computer which only allows me to > "sudo" before commands. I cannot log in as root (to my knowledge). > Does "sudo bash" work to get you logged in as root? That is my typical way to get around systems that don't allow a direct root login > The instructions at the end of section 5 state: > > "The commands in the remainder of this book must be performed while logged > in as user root and no longer as user lfs. Also, double check that $LFSis set > in > root's environment." > > Is it sufficient to sudo before every command in the rest of the book, or > do I need to find a way to log in as the user "root"? > > Thanks. > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] lfs 7.4 / Section 6 - Building the LFS System as sudo?
Hello, On Ubuntu and Mint, I found out that if you run: sudo passwd root And set the password, you can run "su - root" and login as root. I do this as one of the first things when setting up a Ubuntu or Mint system because I cannot stand sudo. Hope this helps! Douglas Reno -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] lfs 7.4 / Section 6 - Building the LFS System as sudo?
On 11/29/2013 01:56 PM, frozen tuesday wrote: > Hello all -- > > Thanks to the help I have received here or elsewhere, I have made it as > far as section III in the online instructions: "Building the LFS System". > > I am using Linux Mint 15 as my host computer which only allows me to > "sudo" before commands. I cannot log in as root (to my knowledge). The > instructions at the end of section 5 state: > > "The commands in the remainder of this book must be performed while > logged in as user |root| and no longer as user |lfs|. Also, double check > that |$LFS| is set in |root|'s environment." > > Is it sufficient to sudo before every command in the rest of the book, > or do I need to find a way to log in as the user "root"? > > Thanks. You stay root anyway as long as you're in the chroot. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] lfs 7.4 / Section 6 - Building the LFS System as sudo?
Hello all -- Thanks to the help I have received here or elsewhere, I have made it as far as section III in the online instructions: "Building the LFS System". I am using Linux Mint 15 as my host computer which only allows me to "sudo" before commands. I cannot log in as root (to my knowledge). The instructions at the end of section 5 state: "The commands in the remainder of this book must be performed while logged in as user root and no longer as user lfs. Also, double check that $LFS is set in root's environment." Is it sufficient to sudo before every command in the rest of the book, or do I need to find a way to log in as the user "root"? Thanks. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
On 2013-11-29 18:26, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > alex@xfsmail.comwrote: > >> My real point is this one. Bash-3.2 (/bin/sh should be a symbolic or hard link to bash) I think maybe it means /bin/sh should be /bin/bash ( /bin/sh -> /bin/bash) but mine is ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ). ( /bin/sh -> /bin/bash ) = ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ) are they same? > > The normal place for bash is /bin because in the case of a separate /usr > partition it will not be available. A separate /usr partition is very > rare because disk drives are quite large and is not needed. > > What you have should work fine with regards to bash. > > -- Bruce Sorry I not really understand that Bruce, alright this is more clear. The requirement is ( /bin/bash ) but I have ( /usr/bin/bash ). Can I use ( /usr/bin/bash ) ? or I should change it to ( /bin/bash ) ? I still get no clue on search engines, maybe there is command to change it ? Any help please! # ALEX # -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
On 2013-11-29 17:59, lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
> Your binutils
version is later than the max-recommended in the book's
>
host-sys-requirements ('7.4/prologue/hostreqs.html'):
> "Binutils-2.17
(Versions greater than 2.23.2 are not recommended as they have
> not
been tested)"
>
> However, we here have just recently built a few
(partly-)lfs74-based systems
> with a similar
'greater-than-max-recommended' versions in host-os for binutils
> and
gcc (and iirc one or two more core parts), and all was well; (although
they
> were quite heavily-customised builds, the toolchain part
(chapter-5) was
> more-or-less 100% by-the-book).
>
> hth,
> akh
>
--
I will take the risk, I'm still new with Mageia, I installed a week
ago and maybe I will go back to Debian later. Thank you for letting me
know about it.
# ALEX #
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
a...@xfsmail.com wrote: > My real point is this one. > Bash-3.2 (/bin/sh should be a symbolic or hard link > to bash) I think maybe it means /bin/sh should be /bin/bash ( /bin/sh -> > /bin/bash) but mine is ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ). > ( /bin/sh -> /bin/bash ) = ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ) are they same? The normal place for bash is /bin because in the case of a separate /usr partition it will not be available. A separate /usr partition is very rare because disk drives are quite large and is not needed. What you have should work fine with regards to bash. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
On 2013-11-29 17:52, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > alex@xfsmail.comwrote: > >> Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it. I'm with Mageia 3 and this is on the host bash, version 4.2.37(2)-release /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash Binutils: (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.23.51.0.8.20121218 bison (GNU Bison) 2.7 /usr/bin/yacc -> /usr/bin/yacc.bison bzip2, Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010. Coreutils: 8.20 diff (GNU diffutils) 3.2 find (GNU findutils) 4.5.10 GNU Awk 4.0.2 /usr/bin/awk -> /usr/bin/gawk gcc (GCC) 4.7.2 g++ (GCC) 4.7.2 (GNU libc) 2.17 grep (GNU grep) 2.14 gzip 1.5 Linux version 3.8.13-desktop586-1.mga3 (i...@jonund.mageia.org) (gcc version 4.7.2 (GCC) ) #1 SMP Tue May 14 19:06:27 UTC 2013 m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.16 version-check.sh: line 29: make: command not found GNU patch 2.7.1 Perl version='5.16.3'; sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2 tar (GNU tar) 1.26 Texinfo: makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.13 xz (XZ Utils) 5.1.2alpha g++ compilation OK Is my Mageia 3 ready for LFS 7.4 ? > > Not without make. > > -- Bruce Sorry about "make" my eyes are not careful. My real point is this one. Bash-3.2 (/bin/sh should be a symbolic or hard link to bash) I think maybe it means /bin/sh should be /bin/bash ( /bin/sh -> /bin/bash) but mine is ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ). ( /bin/sh -> /bin/bash ) = ( /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash ) are they same? # ALEX # -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
Em 29-11-2013 14:52, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > a...@xfsmail.com wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it. >> >> I'm with >> Mageia 3 and this is on the host >> >> >> >> bash, >> version 4.2.37(2)-release >> /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash >> Binutils: (Linux/GNU >> Binutils) 2.23.51.0.8.20121218 >> bison (GNU Bison) 2.7 >> /usr/bin/yacc -> >> /usr/bin/yacc.bison >> bzip2, Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010. >> Coreutils: >> 8.20 >> diff (GNU diffutils) 3.2 >> find (GNU findutils) 4.5.10 >> GNU Awk >> 4.0.2 >> /usr/bin/awk -> /usr/bin/gawk >> gcc (GCC) 4.7.2 >> g++ (GCC) 4.7.2 >> (GNU >> libc) 2.17 >> grep (GNU grep) 2.14 >> gzip 1.5 >> Linux version >> 3.8.13-desktop586-1.mga3 (i...@jonund.mageia.org) (gcc version 4.7.2 >> (GCC) ) #1 SMP Tue May 14 19:06:27 UTC 2013 >> m4 (GNU M4) >> 1.4.16 >> version-check.sh: line 29: make: command not found >> GNU patch >> 2.7.1 >> Perl version='5.16.3'; >> sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2 >> tar (GNU tar) >> 1.26 >> Texinfo: makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.13 >> xz (XZ Utils) 5.1.2alpha >> g++ >> compilation OK >> >> >> Is my Mageia 3 ready for LFS 7.4 ? > > Not without make. > >-- Bruce > I have GNU Make 3.82 in Mageia 3, but do not remember if installed it for vmware-tools. Anyway, it is in the graphics interface for installing/removing programs, just search "make" and install, if it is not already installed. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:47:23 +
> From: a...@xfsmail.com
> To:
> Subject: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
>
> Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it.
>
> I'm with
> Mageia 3 and this is on the host
>
>
>
> bash,
> version 4.2.37(2)-release
> /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash
> Binutils: (Linux/GNU
> Binutils) 2.23.51.0.8.20121218
Your binutils version is later than the max-recommended in the book's
host-sys-requirements ('7.4/prologue/hostreqs.html'):
"Binutils-2.17 (Versions greater than 2.23.2 are not recommended as they have
not been tested)"
However, we here have just recently built a few (partly-)lfs74-based systems
with a similar 'greater-than-max-recommended' versions in host-os for binutils
and gcc (and iirc one or two more core parts), and all was well; (although they
were quite heavily-customised builds, the toolchain part (chapter-5) was
more-or-less 100% by-the-book).
hth,
akh
> bison (GNU Bison) 2.7
> /usr/bin/yacc ->
> /usr/bin/yacc.bison
> bzip2, Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010.
> Coreutils:
> 8.20
> diff (GNU diffutils) 3.2
> find (GNU findutils) 4.5.10
> GNU Awk
> 4.0.2
> /usr/bin/awk -> /usr/bin/gawk
> gcc (GCC) 4.7.2
> g++ (GCC) 4.7.2
> (GNU
> libc) 2.17
> grep (GNU grep) 2.14
> gzip 1.5
> Linux version
> 3.8.13-desktop586-1.mga3 (i...@jonund.mageia.org) (gcc version 4.7.2
> (GCC) ) #1 SMP Tue May 14 19:06:27 UTC 2013
> m4 (GNU M4)
> 1.4.16
> version-check.sh: line 29: make: command not found
> GNU patch
> 2.7.1
> Perl version='5.16.3';
> sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2
> tar (GNU tar)
> 1.26
> Texinfo: makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.13
> xz (XZ Utils) 5.1.2alpha
> g++
> compilation OK
>
>
> Is my Mageia 3 ready for LFS 7.4 ?
>
>
> # ALEX #
>
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:47:23 + > From: a...@xfsmail.com > To: > Subject: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3 > > Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it. > > I'm with > Mageia 3 and this is on the host > > > > bash, > version 4.2.37(2)-release > /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash > Binutils: (Linux/GNU > Binutils) 2.23.51.0.8.20121218 > bison (GNU Bison) 2.7 > /usr/bin/yacc -> > /usr/bin/yacc.bison > bzip2, Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010. > Coreutils: > 8.20 > diff (GNU diffutils) 3.2 > find (GNU findutils) 4.5.10 > GNU Awk > 4.0.2 > /usr/bin/awk -> /usr/bin/gawk > gcc (GCC) 4.7.2 > g++ (GCC) 4.7.2 > (GNU > libc) 2.17 > grep (GNU grep) 2.14 > gzip 1.5 > Linux version > 3.8.13-desktop586-1.mga3 (i...@jonund.mageia.org) (gcc version 4.7.2 > (GCC) ) #1 SMP Tue May 14 19:06:27 UTC 2013 > m4 (GNU M4) > 1.4.16 > version-check.sh: line 29: make: command not found > GNU patch > 2.7.1 > Perl version='5.16.3'; > sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2 > tar (GNU tar) > 1.26 > Texinfo: makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.13 > xz (XZ Utils) 5.1.2alpha > g++ > compilation OK > > > Is my Mageia 3 ready for LFS 7.4 ? > > > # ALEX # > - an initial glance-over flags up the "version-check.sh: line 29: make: command not found" : have you got 'make' installed? Haven't checked your output beyond that. rgds, akh -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
a...@xfsmail.com wrote: > > > Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it. > > I'm with > Mageia 3 and this is on the host > > > > bash, > version 4.2.37(2)-release > /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash > Binutils: (Linux/GNU > Binutils) 2.23.51.0.8.20121218 > bison (GNU Bison) 2.7 > /usr/bin/yacc -> > /usr/bin/yacc.bison > bzip2, Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010. > Coreutils: > 8.20 > diff (GNU diffutils) 3.2 > find (GNU findutils) 4.5.10 > GNU Awk > 4.0.2 > /usr/bin/awk -> /usr/bin/gawk > gcc (GCC) 4.7.2 > g++ (GCC) 4.7.2 > (GNU > libc) 2.17 > grep (GNU grep) 2.14 > gzip 1.5 > Linux version > 3.8.13-desktop586-1.mga3 (i...@jonund.mageia.org) (gcc version 4.7.2 > (GCC) ) #1 SMP Tue May 14 19:06:27 UTC 2013 > m4 (GNU M4) > 1.4.16 > version-check.sh: line 29: make: command not found > GNU patch > 2.7.1 > Perl version='5.16.3'; > sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2 > tar (GNU tar) > 1.26 > Texinfo: makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.13 > xz (XZ Utils) 5.1.2alpha > g++ > compilation OK > > > Is my Mageia 3 ready for LFS 7.4 ? Not without make. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
Hello Le 29/11/2013 18:47, a...@xfsmail.com a écrit : > version-check.sh: line 29: make: command not found I think that the make command must be install. So your Mageia is not ready for LFS 7.4, and you ? are you ready to read the book and your screen ? Bye Denis -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] Host System Requirements LFS 7.4 with Mageia 3
Hi all, I'm still new for LFS, I'm going too try it. I'm with Mageia 3 and this is on the host bash, version 4.2.37(2)-release /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash Binutils: (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.23.51.0.8.20121218 bison (GNU Bison) 2.7 /usr/bin/yacc -> /usr/bin/yacc.bison bzip2, Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010. Coreutils: 8.20 diff (GNU diffutils) 3.2 find (GNU findutils) 4.5.10 GNU Awk 4.0.2 /usr/bin/awk -> /usr/bin/gawk gcc (GCC) 4.7.2 g++ (GCC) 4.7.2 (GNU libc) 2.17 grep (GNU grep) 2.14 gzip 1.5 Linux version 3.8.13-desktop586-1.mga3 (i...@jonund.mageia.org) (gcc version 4.7.2 (GCC) ) #1 SMP Tue May 14 19:06:27 UTC 2013 m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.16 version-check.sh: line 29: make: command not found GNU patch 2.7.1 Perl version='5.16.3'; sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2 tar (GNU tar) 1.26 Texinfo: makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.13 xz (XZ Utils) 5.1.2alpha g++ compilation OK Is my Mageia 3 ready for LFS 7.4 ? # ALEX # -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.4
Baho Utot wrote: > Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink? > > I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies. > > I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout > that i686 has ie without the lib64 directories I really don't know but I can make some guesses. uname --machine gives x86_64. I wouldn't be suprised if some packages that assume a multilib system use that value to insist on /lib64 or /usr/lib64. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] LFS-7.4
Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink? I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies. I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout that i686 has ie without the lib64 directories -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Ethernet Card Not Found
> From: Simon Geard > To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org > Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 21:23:05 +1300 > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Ethernet Card Not Found > > On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 10:28 +, akhiezer wrote: > > You're expending resources to try to persuade people that there's no issue > > here. > > I'm not trying to persuade anyone anything... I'm trying to understand > why this is considered such an important thing, why it comes up again > and again as a source of anger and frustration. In fifteen years of > using Linux, I've seen few developments attract such heated reaction > (the only one that comes to mind was Mono)- and I don't understand why > that's the case. > When you use terms like 'melodrama', then you _are_ trying to persuade people of a position - howevermuch-inadvertently (e.g. if you're not understanding the import of the words that you're using: and if you _are_ understanding said import, then, again, spare us the attempted disingenuity of such posts that are then followed by attempted step-back disclaimers like your post above). rgds, akhiezer > Simon. > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Ethernet Card Not Found
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 10:28 +, akhiezer wrote: > You're expending resources to try to persuade people that there's no issue > here. I'm not trying to persuade anyone anything... I'm trying to understand why this is considered such an important thing, why it comes up again and again as a source of anger and frustration. In fifteen years of using Linux, I've seen few developments attract such heated reaction (the only one that comes to mind was Mono)- and I don't understand why that's the case. Simon. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
